Impact of Anatomic Site, Specimen Collection Timing, and Patient Symptom Status on Neisseria gonorrhoeae Culture Recovery

Pharyngeal gonococcal infection and the sensitivity of oral gargle samples in comparison to self-collected throat swabs for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in persons in Tyrol, Austria

PURPOSE

Asymptomatic pharyngeal gonorrhoea could play an important role in transmission and should be screened for in persons at risk. We investigated the sensitivity of oral gargle samples to detect N. gonorrhoea and describe the frequency of infection by anatomical site.

METHODS

From June 2021 to July 2022 persons diagnosed with gonorrhoea in the STI/HIV department were asked to provide self-collected specimens for single-site testing by NAAT from throat (by gargling and swabbing), anorectum, and first-void urine.

RESULTS

104 episodes of gonorrhoea were analysed in 88 individuals. The median age was 33 years, 85 persons (96.5%) were male. The pharynx was the most common site of infection (71 cases, 68.2%); in 26 persons (25.0%) it was the only site of infection. Anorectal infection was detected in 65 cases (62.5%) and urogenital infection in 25 cases (24.0%). In 46 cases (44.2%) infection was detected in more than one anatomical site. Gargling was less sensitive than throat swabbing to detect pharyngeal infection (85.9% versus 97.2%, p = .038), but was preferred by patients. Only 4 of 71 pharyngeal infections (5.6%) were symptomatic; anorectal and urogenital infections were symptomatic in 12.3% and 76.0% of cases, respectively. Culture recovery of N.gonorrhoeae was only possible in 15.8% of throat swabs, but was successful in 61.9% of anorectal and 84.2% of urogenital samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic pharyngeal gonorrhoea is common. Gargle samples should be used only as alternative specimens with inferior sensitivity compared to throat swab samples.

Doxycycline to prevent bacterial sexually transmitted infections in the USA: final results from the DoxyPEP multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial and open-label extension

BACKGROUND

Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) is a promising intervention to reduce bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We evaluated the effect of doxy-PEP on STI incidence and antimicrobial resistance in men who have sex with men and transgender women for up to 12 months of follow-up, inlcuding an open-label extension.

METHODS

DoxyPEP, an open-label trial in Seattle (WA, USA) and San Francisco (CA, USA) among men who have sex with men and transgender women with at least one bacterial STI in the past year, randomly assigned participants by clinic (with computer-generated variable block sizes) 2:1 to doxy-PEP (200 mg doxycycline delayed-release tablets 24-72 h after condomless sex) or standard care. The independent endpoint adjudication committee was masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was presence of one or more bacterial STIs (Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or early syphilis) each quarter. This outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat cohort, which included participants with at least one follow-up quarter (ie, ∼3 months) in their as-randomised assignment. After early termination of the randomised phase for efficacy, all participants still enrolled were offered doxy-PEP in an open-label extension (OLE). We report quarterly incidence of bacterial STIs for the as-randomised and OLE periods. Safety was assessed in all participants with any follow-up data. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03980223) and is completed.

FINDINGS

From Aug 19, 2020, to May 13, 2022, we enrolled 637 participants; 592 participants completed at least one follow-up quarter in the randomised phase (411 in the doxy-PEP group and 181 in the standard-care group) and 282 in the OLE phase (207 in the doxy-PEP group and 82 in the standard-care group). STIs were present in 129 (12·0%) of 1077 quarters in the doxy-PEP group versus 139 (30·5%) of 455 quarters in the standard-care group during the as-randomised period, showing an absolute difference of 19 percentage points and a relative risk of 0·39 (95% CI 0·31-0·49, p<0·0001). During the OLE, STIs were diagnosed in 51 (13%) of 388 quarters among those continuing doxy-PEP and 25 (17%) of 145 quarters among standard-care participants who initiated doxy-PEP. Throughout all quarters for participants on doxy-PEP, there was one grade 2 laboratory abnormality and five grade 3 adverse events that were possibly or probably related to doxy-PEP. No serious adverse events were attributed by site investigators to doxycycline. Of participants with positive gonorrhoea cultures during the study, eight (27%) of 29 taking doxy-PEP versus five (24%) of 21 not taking doxy-PEP had tetracycline resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥2 μg/mL).

INTERPRETATION

Doxy-PEP was effective in reducing bacterial STIs in this population of men who have sex with men and transgender women, including during an open-label extension when doxy-PEP efficacy was known. Doxy-PEP was well tolerated, highly acceptable, and with no new safety signals.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure to the recommended antibiotic regimen-Québec, Canada, 2015-19

OBJECTIVE

To describe Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure to the recommended antimicrobial regimens (azithromycin, cefixime and ceftriaxone).

METHODS

Our study was a longitudinal analysis of treatment failures from an observational open cohort of gonococcal infection cases collected in Québec, Canada (n = 2547) between September 2015 and December 2019. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire, direct case interviews and chart reviews. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the agar dilution method. To be retained as a treatment failure, cases must have had (i) a laboratory-confirmed gonococcal infection; (ii) a documented treatment; (iii) a positive test of cure (TOC) performed within a defined period and (iv) no sexual contact (vaginal, oral or anal), even protected with a condom, between the beginning of treatment and the positive TOC. A broader definition, including suspected cases, was also examined.

RESULTS

Among 1593 cases where a TOC was performed, 83 had a positive TOC: 11 were retained as treatment failure, and 6 were considered suspected cases (overall = 17/1593; 1.1%). Possible explanations for retained or suspected treatment failure included resistance to the antibiotics used for treatment (n = 1), pharyngeal infection (n = 9, of which 5 had been treated with ceftriaxone and 4 with other regimens); and azithromycin monotherapy (n = 1). Some cases had more than one potential explanation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment failure occurred in 1.1% of cases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection for which a TOC was performed, including some cases of pharyngeal infection treated with ceftriaxone.

Impact of time of culture specimen collection on the recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae after a positive nucleic acid amplification test

OBJECTIVES

Culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains essential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. We evaluated the effect of time of specimen collection on culture yield following a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed N. gonorrhoeae culture yield among asymptomatic individuals (largely men who have sex with men) who attended for sexual health screening and had a positive NAAT. Participants underwent either same-day testing and notification (Drassanes Exprés) or standard screening with deferred testing.

RESULTS

Among 10 423 screened individuals, 809 (7.7%) tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae. A total of 995 different anatomical sites of infection culture was performed in 583 of 995 (58.6%) of anatomical sites (Drassanes Exprés 278 of 347, 80.1%; standard screening 305 of 648, 47.1%; p<0.001). Recovery was highest when culture specimens were collected within 3-7 days of screening with only a slight drop in recovery when the interval extended to 7 days . Recovery from pharynx was 38 of 149 (25.5%) within 3 days, 19 of 81 (23.4%) after 4-7 days (p=0.7245), 11 of 102 (10.7%) after 8-14 days (p<0.0036) and 1 of 22 (4.5%) with longer delays (p=0.00287). Recovery from rectum was 49 of 75 (65.3%) within 3 days, 28 of 45 (62.2%) after 4-7 days (p=0.7318), 41 of 69 (59.4%) after 8-14 days (p=0.4651) and 6 of 18 (33.3%) with longer delays (p=0.0131). Median culture specimen collection time was 1 day within Drassanes Exprés vs 8 days within standard screening. Consequently, the overall culture yield was slightly higher within Drassanes Exprés (102/278, 36.6% vs 99/305, 32.5%; p=0.2934).

CONCLUSION

Reducing the interval between screening and collection of culture specimens increased N. gonorrhoeae recovery in extragenital samples. Implementing a same-day testing and notification programme increased collection of culture samples and culture yield in our setting, which may help AMR surveillance.

Postexposure Doxycycline to Prevent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections

BACKGROUND

Interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) are needed.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, randomized study involving MSM and transgender women who were taking preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (PrEP cohort) or living with HIV infection (persons living with HIV infection [PLWH] cohort) and who had had Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhea), Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia), or syphilis in the past year. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to take 200 mg of doxycycline within 72 hours after condomless sex (doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis) or receive standard care without doxycycline. STI testing was performed quarterly. The primary end point was the incidence of at least one STI per follow-up quarter.

RESULTS

Of 501 participants (327 in the PrEP cohort and 174 in the PLWH cohort), 67% were White, 7% Black, 11% Asian or Pacific Islander, and 30% Hispanic or Latino. In the PrEP cohort, an STI was diagnosed in 61 of 570 quarterly visits (10.7%) in the doxycycline group and 82 of 257 quarterly visits (31.9%) in the standard-care group, for an absolute difference of -21.2 percentage points and a relative risk of 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.46; P<0.001). In the PLWH cohort, an STI was diagnosed in 36 of 305 quarterly visits (11.8%) in the doxycycline group and 39 of 128 quarterly visits (30.5%) in the standard-care group, for an absolute difference of -18.7 percentage points and a relative risk of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.60; P<0.001). The incidences of the three evaluated STIs were lower with doxycycline than with standard care; in the PrEP cohort, the relative risks were 0.45 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.65) for gonorrhea, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.25) for chlamydia, and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.59) for syphilis, and in the PLWH cohort, the relative risks were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.71), 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.57), and 0.23 (95% CI, 0.04 to 1.29), respectively. Five grade 3 adverse events and no serious adverse events were attributed to doxycycline. Of the participants with gonorrhea culture available, tetracycline-resistant gonorrhea occurred in 5 of 13 in the doxycycline groups and 2 of 16 in the standard-care groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined incidence of gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis was lower by two thirds with doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis than with standard care, a finding that supports its use among MSM with recent bacterial STIs. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; DoxyPEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03980223.).

Pharyngeal Gonorrhea in Heterosexual Male and Female Sex Partners of Persons With Gonorrhea

BACKGROUND

Current guidance from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends empiric treatment for persons exposed to sexually transmitted infections, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae ( NG ). As an antimicrobial stewardship measure, some clinics now recommend a test and treat strategy, but reliance on urogenital testing only may miss cases.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive analysis of pharyngeal NG infection in men who have sex with women (MSW) and women seeking care at a sexual health clinic in Seattle, WA, from February 2017 to July 2021 because of sexual contact to a partner diagnosed with gonorrhea. We also explored behavioral factors associated with pharyngeal NG positivity (by culture or nucleic acid amplification test by χ2 analysis.

RESULTS

Among 352 NG contacts tested for urogenital or pharyngeal infection, 34% were positive for NG at ≥1 anatomic site (27% for MSW and 40% for women). Among 161 NG contacts tested at the pharynx, 30% (n = 48) were positive: 20% of 54 MSW (n = 11) and 35% (n = 37) of 107 women. If only urogenital testing were performed, 36% of MSW NG infections (n = 5) and 19% of female NG infections (n = 9) would have remained unidentified.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal NG is relatively common among MSW and women who have been exposed to NG, and likely represents an underdiagnosed reservoir of NG infection. If empiric treatment is abandoned in favor of testing and treating, testing the throats of heterosexuals will be necessary.

Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture growth rates from asymptomatic individuals with a positive nucleic acid amplification test

Gonorrhoea infections are frequently diagnosed at extragenital locations in asymptomatic individuals and are historically related to poor recovery in culture, which hinders antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate recovery rates of N. gonorrhoeae by culture among asymptomatic individuals who tested positive by nucleic acid amplification tests between 2018 and 2019 in Barcelona (Spain). In total, 10,396 individuals were tested for N. gonorrhoeae on first-void urine, rectal, pharyngeal, and/or vaginal swabs depending on sexual behaviour. Overall infection prevalence was 5.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0 to 5.9%). Seven hundred and ten samples were positive corresponding to 567 individuals. The most common site of infection was the pharynx (71.3%), followed by rectum (23.1%) and genitals (4.7%) (p<0.0001). The N. gonorrhoeae recovery rate in culture, time from positive screening to culture specimen, and inoculation delay were calculated. Recovery rate was 21.7% in pharynx, 66.9% in rectum, and 37.0% in genitals (25.0% vagina, 71.4% urethra) (p<0.0001). Median culture collection time was 1 [0; 3] days, and median inoculation delay was 5.01 [4.99-7.99] hours, with no impact on N. gonorrhoeae recovery, p=0.8367 and p=0.7670, respectively. Despite efforts towards optimizing pre-analytical conditions, the N. gonorrhoeae recovery rate in asymptomatic individuals is unacceptably low (especially for pharynx), representing a problem for monitoring antimicrobial-resistant infections.

Time to Clearance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae RNA at the Pharynx following Treatment

The number of days until pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results become negative after treatment remains unknown. Between March 2019 and April 2021, we enrolled men who have sex with men (MSM) who had a clinical positive pharyngeal N. gonorrhoeae Aptima Combo 2 test result but had not yet been treated in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. MSM were enrolled on their day of treatment and self-collected daily pharyngeal specimens for 21 days at home. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates to determine the median time to clearance and the >95% time to clearance and the log rank test for equality to evaluate factors associated with time to clearance. Sixty-four men were enrolled in the study. Analyses excluded 8 men (12.5%) who were N. gonorrhoeae negative by NAAT at enrollment and 11 (17%) who failed to return any home-collected specimens. Among the 45 men included in the analysis, the median time to N. gonorrhoeae NAAT clearance was 3 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 5 days). Time to clearance for >95% of the cohort was 12 days (95% CI, 10 days to an undefined time). Men with a history of N. gonorrhoeae infection cleared faster than men without such history (8 days versus 17 days for >95% time to clearance; P = 0.03). In the absence of reexposure, positive N. gonorrhoeae Aptima Combo 2 assay results obtained prior to 12 days after treatment are likely false-positive results.

Cyr SB, Town K, Nash EE, Kirkcaldy RD. Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea: An Overview of a Multisite Program to Enhance Local Response Capacity for Antibiotic-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae

BACKGROUND

In 2016, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG) in multiple jurisdictions to enhance antibiotic resistant gonorrhea rapid detection and response infrastructure and evaluate the impact of key strategies.

METHODS

Eight jurisdictions were funded to establish or enhance local gonococcal culture specimen collection in sexually transmitted disease and community clinics, conduct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in local laboratories, modify systems for enhanced data collection and rapid communication of results, and initiate enhanced partner services among patients with gonorrhea demonstrating elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ceftriaxone, cefixime or azithromycin.

RESULTS

Grantees incorporated genital, pharyngeal, and rectal gonococcal culture collection from all genders at participating clinics. During 2018 to 2019, grantees collected 58,441 culture specimens from 46,822 patients and performed AST on 10,814 isolates (representing 6.8% [3412] and 8.9% [4883] of local reported cases in 2018 and 2019, respectively). Of isolates that underwent AST, 11% demonstrated elevated azithromycin MICs; fewer than 0.5% demonstrated elevated ceftriaxone or cefixime MICs. Among patients whose infections demonstrated elevated MICs, 81.7% were interviewed for partner elicitation; however, limited new cases were identified among partners and contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

As a public health model to build capacity to slow the spread of emerging resistance, SURRG successfully expanded culture collection, implemented rapid AST, and implemented an enhanced partner services investigation approach in participating jurisdictions. Findings from SURRG may enhance preparedness efforts and inform a longer-term, comprehensive, and evidence-based public health response to emerging gonococcal resistance. Continued development of innovative approaches to address emerging resistance is needed.

Enhancing Gonococcal Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Cisgender Women, Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea, 2018 to 2019

BACKGROUND

Cisgender women have been underrepresented in antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea (ARGC) surveillance systems. Three of 8 project sites (City of Milwaukee [MIL], Guilford County [GRB], Denver County [DEN]), funded under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea (SURRG), focused efforts to better include cisgender women in ARGC surveillance.

METHODS

MIL, GRB, and DEN partnered with diverse health care settings and developed gonorrhea culture criteria to facilitate urogenital specimen collection in cisgender women and men. Regional laboratories within the Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory Network performed agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of gonococcal isolates. Data from 2018 and 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

In SURRG, 90.5% (11,464 of 12,667) of the cisgender women from whom urogenital culture specimens were collected were from MIL, GRB, and DEN. Of women in SURRG whose gonococcal isolates underwent AST, 70% were from these 3 sites. In these 3 sites, a substantial proportion of cisgender women with positive urogenital cultures and AST were from health care settings other than sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics (non-STD clinics; MIL, 56.0%; GRB, 80.4%; and DEN, 23.5%). Isolates with AST were obtained from 5.1%, 10.2%, and 2.4% of all diagnosed gonorrhea cases among cisgender women in MIL, GRB, and DEN, respectively, and were more often susceptible to all antibiotics than those from cisgender men from each of these sites.

CONCLUSIONS

With focused efforts and partnerships with non-STD clinics, 3 SURRG sites were able to include robust ARGC surveillance from cisgender women. These findings may guide further efforts to improve gender equity in ARGC surveillance.