PD-L1 Expression Harmonization in Gastric Cancer Using 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assays

[Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract. German version]

As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological therapy concepts, the complexity of therapy decisions and control in the area of carcinomas of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD‑1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.

What Therapeutic Biomarkers in Gastro-Esophageal Junction and Gastric Cancer Should a Pathologist Know About?

Malignancies of upper gastrointestinal tract are aggressive, and most locally advanced unresectable and metastatic cancers are managed by a combination of surgery and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Current therapeutic recommendations include targeted therapies based on biomarker expression of an individual tumor. All G/gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancers should be tested for HER2 status as a reflex test at the time of diagnosis. Currently, testing for PDL 1 and mismatch repair protein status is optional. HER2 testing is restricted to adenocarcinomas only and endoscopic biopsies, resections, or cellblocks. Facilities should be available for performing validated immunohistochemical stains and in-situ hybridization techniques, and importantly, pathologists should be experienced with preanalytical and analytical issues and scoring criteria. Genomic profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS) is another strategy that assess numerous mutations and other molecular events simultaneously, including HER2 amplification, MSS status, tumor mutation burden, and neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinases gene fusions.

Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: A rapidly evolving landscape

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma represent frequent and severe diseases whose management has radically changed over the last 10 years. With the advent of second- and third-line standard therapies for metastatic GC patients in the 2010s, the molecular dismemberment of the disease and positive trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents will mark the 2020s. New treatment options have emerged in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting. In addition to improved multimodal treatment in operable patients, new subgroups have emerged depending on molecular alterations (HER2, Microsatellite instability) or expression of specific proteins in the tumour (PDL1, Claudin 18.2) making immunohistochemistry central in profiling the tumour for an optimal individualised management. The aim of this review is to describe the current standards of management of early and late stage GC and the molecular markers needed today to optimally manage our patients together with future perspectives on this disease.

Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract

As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological concepts, the complexity of treatment decisions and control in the area of cancers of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD-1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.

Indirect Clinical Validation of a Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Laboratory-Developed Test for Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma with 22C3 Antibody Concentrate

BACKGROUND

The PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx used on the Dako Autostainer Link 48 (ASL48) staining platform is an established method for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor tissue and determining patient eligibility for pembrolizumab treatment; however, the availability of this platform is limited in Europe and Asia.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to develop and optimize protocols for the PD-L1 22C3 antibody concentrate with multiple immunohistochemistry staining platforms and to validate these protocols using PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) with a cut-off of ≥ 1 in gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

DESIGN

The 22C3 antibody concentrate was tested and optimized protocols were developed for use with three staining platforms: Dako ASL48, Ventana BenchMark ULTRA, and Leica BOND-MAX. Tumor specimens (N = 120) from patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were used for the validation study; these specimens were evaluated independently by three pathologists for PD-L1 CPS as a continuous variable and using a cut-off of ≥ 1. PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx used on the Dako ASL48 platform served as the reference or gold standard.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient of CPS as a continuous variable between the gold standard and each staining platform assessed was 0.910-0.989. When CPS was dichotomized based on a cut-off of ≥ 1, depending on the pathologist and the platform used, positive percentage agreement was 81-99% and negative percentage agreement was 90-100%. Interobserver agreement using the gold standard showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.779).

CONCLUSION

The PD-L1 22C3 antibody concentrate can potentially be used with the laboratory-developed test on three commercially available immunohistochemistry staining platforms to determine PD-L1 expression in tumor samples from patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Advances in molecular biomarkers research and clinical application progress for gastric cancer immunotherapy

Gastric cancer is characterized by high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early-stage gastric cancer is mainly treated with surgery, while for advanced gastric cancer, the current treatment options remain insufficient. In the 2022 NCCN Guidelines for Gastric Cancer, immunotherapy is listed as a first-line option for certain conditions. Immunotherapy for gastric cancer mainly targets the PD-1 molecule and achieves therapeutic effects by activating T cells. In addition, therapeutic strategies targeting other molecules, such as CTLA4, LAG3, Tim3, TIGIT, and OX40, have also been developed to improve the treatment efficacy of gastric cancer immunotherapy. This review summarizes the molecular biomarkers of gastric cancer immunotherapy and their clinical trials.