A Comprehensive Study of Nondysplastic and Dysplastic Serrated Polyps of the Vermiform Appendix

Connecting the dots: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and serrated polyps in the appendix

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the relationship between low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) and serrated polyps (SPs) of the appendix, both characterized by KRAS mutations and overlapping morphologic features.

METHODS

We analyzed 27 cases of LAMN and 24 cases of SP from archival records, reviewed pathology, and performed molecular analysis on select cases. Four cases initially diagnosed as LAMN were excluded for not meeting diagnostic criteria, and 1 SP case was reclassified as LAMN.

RESULTS

Microscopic evaluation revealed serrated architecture in 8 (29.6%) of 27 LAMNs: 4 hyperplastic polyp-like, 2 sessile serrated lesion-like (SSL), and 1 traditional serrated adenoma-like (TSA). One case exhibited both SSL- and TSA-like areas. Among SPs, 3 (12.5%) of 24 cases showed morphologic overlap with LAMN due to cytoplasmic mucin, flattened mucosa, and conventional adenoma-like features; all were grossly visible. KRAS was the most common mutation in LAMNs with serrated architecture (4/4, 100%), 1 classic LAMN, and 1 SP with dysplasia and associated signet-ring cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Serrated polyps and LAMNs likely represent a biological continuum, sharing key features such as KRAS mutations and morphologic overlap. Our findings underscore the need for careful molecular and histopathologic evaluation in diagnosing these neoplasms.

A practical guide to serrated appendiceal lesions

Several neoplastic and non-neoplastic proliferations of the appendix can show varying degrees of serrated epithelial architecture. Of these, diffuse mucosal hyperplasia is most common, followed in frequency by low-grade mucinous and serrated neoplasms. It is important to distinguish serrated appendiceal neoplasms from their potential mimics because these entities may be managed differently. Diffuse mucosal hyperplasia is a non-neoplastic change that usually develops in the setting of resolving appendicitis and requires no further therapy or surveillance, and serrated neoplasms confined to the mucosa are adequately treated by appendectomy alone. On the other hand, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms may require surveillance, and those with extra-appendiceal spread differ from adenocarcinomas arising from serrated neoplasms with respect to both treatment and prognosis. Low-grade mucinous neoplasms in the peritoneum are frequently amenable to peritoneum-directed therapies alone, while adenocarcinomas derived from serrated neoplasms often spread to both regional lymph nodes and the peritoneum, potentially requiring right colectomy and systemic chemotherapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature regarding the clinical and pathologic features of appendiceal lesions that show epithelial serration and provide the reader with helpful tips to distinguish serrated neoplasms from their mimics.

The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review

The serrated pathway to colorectal cancers (CRCs) is a significant pathway encompassing five distinct types of lesions, namely hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia (SSL-Ds), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and serrated adenoma unclassified. In contrast to the conventional adenoma-carcinoma pathway, the serrated pathway primarily involves two mechanisms: BRAF/KRAS mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). HPs are the most prevalent non-malignant lesions, while SSLs play a crucial role as precursors to CRCs, On the other hand, traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) are the least frequently encountered subtype, also serving as precursors to CRCs. It is crucial to differentiate these lesions based on their unique morphological characteristics observed in histology and colonoscopy, as the identification and management of these serrated lesions significantly impact colorectal cancer screening programs. The management of these lesions necessitates the crucial steps of removing premalignant lesions and implementing regular surveillance. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the epidemiology, histologic features, molecular features, and detection methods for various serrated polyps, along with recommendations for their management and surveillance.

The Vermiform Appendix and Its Pathologies

The vermiform appendix is a muscular cylindrical structure originating near the junction of the cecum and ileum, averaging 9 cm (5-35 cm) in size. As the most mobile viscera, it can adopt several positions, the most common being the retrocecal position. Perceived as an atavistic organ lacking physiological relevance, the vermiform appendix appears to be involved in immune function, serving in the maturation of B lymphocytes and the production of immunoglobulin A, in endocrine function, excreting amines and hormones in the 2-3 mL of mucus secreted daily, and in digestive function, by storing beneficial bacteria from where they can recolonize the colon. With a lumen of about 6 mm, the vermiform appendix has a reduced storage capacity, so any blockage of the appendix with fecoliths (fecaliths), seeds derailed from the colon, or enlarged lymph nodes prevents drainage and intraluminal accumulation of secreted mucus. Unable to relax, the appendix wall severely limits its intraluminal volume, so mucus accumulation leads to inflammation of the appendix, known generically as appendicitis. In addition, the vermiform appendix may be the site of the development of neoplastic processes, which may or may not involve mucus production, some of which can significantly affect the standard of living and ultimately lead to death. In general, mucinous tumors may have a better prognosis than non-mucinous tumors. This review takes a comprehensive path, starting by describing the anatomy and embryology of the vermiform appendix and further detailing its inflammatory pathologies, pathologies related to congenital anomalies, and appendix tumors, thus creating an up-to-date framework for better understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of these health problems.

Inherited Cancer Susceptibility Gene Sequence Variations Among Patients With Appendix Cancer

Importance

Germline sequence variations in APC, BMPR1A, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, PMS2, PTEN, SMAD4, STK11, and TP53 genes are associated with susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancers. As a rare cancer, the evaluation of appendiceal cancer (AC) predisposition has been limited.

Objective

To assess the prevalence and spectrum of inherited cancer susceptibility gene sequence variations in patients with AC and the utility of germline genetic testing for this population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients with AC who underwent germline genetic testing of 14 cancer susceptibility genes performed by a clinical testing laboratory between March 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from March to August 2022. Clinical, individual, and family histories were obtained from clinician-completed test requisition forms. Multigene panel testing was performed by targeted custom capture and sequencing and chromosome rearrangement analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were germline sequence variation prevalence and spectrum in patients with AC.

Results

Among the 131 patients with AC in the cohort (90 female [68.7%]), a total of 16 deleterious sequence variations were identified in 15 patients (11.5%). Similarly, when limited to the 74 patients with AC as the first and only primary tumor, a total of 8 patients (10.8%) had at least 1 deleterious sequence variation in a cancer susceptibility gene. Overall, 6 patients (4.6%) had a deleterious sequence variation observed in MUTYH (5 with monoallelic MUTYH and 1 with biallelic MUTYH). All 4 patients with Lynch syndrome (3.1%) had a sequence variation in the MLH1 gene, of whom 3 were aged 50 years or older at AC diagnosis. Five patients (3.8%) had deleterious sequence variations in other cancer predisposition genes (1 with APC [c.3920T>A, p.I1307K], 2 with CHEK2 [c.470T>C, p.I157T], 1 with SMAD4 [c.263 287dup, p.L98IFS*14], and 1 with TP53 [c.524G>A, p.R175H]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, 1 in every 10 patients with AC who underwent testing for hereditary cancer predisposition carried an inherited gene sequence variation associated with cancer susceptibility. Given the high frequency and broad spectrum of germline gene sequence variations, these data suggest that genetic evaluation might be warranted for all patients diagnosed with this rare malignant tumor. A systemic sequencing effort for all patients with AC may also identify cancer vulnerabilities to exploit for therapeutic development in a cancer type for which clinical trials are limited.

Appendiceal sessile serrated lesions are distinct from their right-sided colonic counterparts and may be precursors for appendiceal mucinous neoplasms

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) can occur concurrently with appendiceal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). To interrogate relatedness, we performed multigene and immunohistochemical characterizations of paired and unpaired SSLs and LAMNs. We evaluated 62 serrated lesions from 50 appendectomy specimens for hotspot mutations in BRAF, KRAS and GNAS genes. Cases were subdivided into 3 groups: 20 unpaired SSLs, 18 unpaired LAMNs, and 12 with an SSL and concurrent LAMN. β-catenin and Annexin A10 immunostaining were performed on the SSL and LAMN components in the 12 paired cases, and fourteen colonic SSLs served as controls. There was no significant difference in KRAS hotspot mutation rates in appendiceal SSLs (17/26; 65.4%) and LAMNs (16/30; 53.3%) (p=0.42). BRAF V600E was identified in a single case (1/50; 2.0%) of SSL and concurrent LAMN (p=1.0). Mutations in GNAS were more common in LAMNs (6/30; 20.0%) compared to SSLs (1/31; 3.2%) (p=0.05). The molecular genotypes between paired SSLs and LAMNs were concordant in most cases (10/12; 83.3%). Annexin A10 immunostaining was significantly greater in colonic SSLs (14/14; 100%) compared to appendiceal SSLs (1/12; 8.3%) (p<0.0001). β-catenin immunostaining was significantly increased in LAMNs (10/12; 83.3%) compared to their paired appendiceal SSLs (2/12; 16.7%)(p=0.003). Overall, appendiceal sessile serrated lesions are predominantly driven by KRAS mutations and are not characterized by Annexin A10 immunostaining. Our data suggests that at least a subset of LAMNs may arise from a precursor SSL in which GNAS mutations and/or upregulation of the WNT-signaling pathway are likely key events modulating this progression.

Significance of the Entire Appendiceal Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Serrated Lesions, Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm, and Appendiceal Diverticulosis Disease

Objective

This study was conducted in order to investigate the significance of the entire appendiceal evaluation in the pathological diagnosis of appendiceal serrated lesions, low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN), and appendiceal diverticulosis disease (ADD).

Methods

A total of 702 appendectomy specimens diagnosed from 2017 to 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The specimens were divided into two groups according to the different sampling procedures. In group 1, the vast majority of 337 specimens were partially submitted by routine sampling within 18 months from October 2017 to March 2019. In group 2, 365 of specimens were entirely submitted and examined within 18 months from April 2019 to October 2020. The incidence and pathological features of serrated lesions, LAMN, and ADD in the two groups were compared and analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics between different entities were also studied.

Results

Forty appendiceal serrated lesions, 8 LAMNs, and 21 diverticula were accidentally detected in 702 appendectomy specimens. As compared with group 1, the incidence of appendiceal serrated lesions in group 2 was significantly increased (9.3% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.01), especially for the serrated lesions without dysplasia (7.4% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.01). The entire sampling revealed that loss of lamina propria and replacement with dysplastic mucinous epithelium were statistically significantly associated with LAMN rather than serrated lesions and ADD (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Mural mucin deposition and fibrosis were useful features to distinguish LAMN from simple serrated lesions (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), but mucin deposition was useless for the distinction between LAMN and ADD (P > 0.05) or serrated lesions combined with ADD.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the importance and necessity of careful gross assessment and histologic examination of the entire appendectomy specimen, since the association with unexpected appendiceal lesions is significant and cannot be ignored. The entirely submitted appendix is more sensitive for the detection of appendiceal serrated lesions. In addition, thorough examination and evaluation are essential to distinguish the key pathological features between appendiceal serrated lesions, LAMN, and ADD.

Controversies in appendiceal pathology: Mucinous and goblet cell neoplasms

Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinomas and mucinous neoplasms are uncommon compared with other epithelial tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Both tumour types have been subjected to terminology that belies their biological risk and leads to confusion. Goblet cell adenocarcinomas display patchy staining for endocrine markers and, thus, were previously classified as goblet cell carcinoids. Unlike well-differentiated endocrine neoplasms, however, they often contain high-grade glandular elements and pursue an aggressive course akin to that of conventional adenocarcinoma. Although several authors have recently proposed grading schemes to predict behaviour among goblet cell neoplasms, most that contain high-grade components have already spread beyond the appendix at the time of diagnosis, whereas those confined to the appendix almost always have low-grade features; the added value of grading these tumours is limited. Contradictions also surround the nomenclature of mucinous neoplasms. The World Health Organization and others promote non-malignant terminology to describe metastatic mucinous neoplasms of the peritoneum and eliminate a benign category entirely, even though virtually all neoplasms confined to the appendix pose no recurrence risk following appendectomy. 'Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm' now encompasses a spectrum of benign tumours and malignant neoplasms in the appendix and peritoneum. Although using an umbrella term in this fashion simplifies the roles of pathologists, it provides essentially no actionable information beyond that which is already clinically apparent. Broad strokes nomenclature also ensures that many patients with no risk of recurrence will receive unnecessary surveillance while others will undergo inappropriate surgical procedures due to lapses in communication. Moreover, a surprising number of non-neoplastic mucinous lesions are misclassified as low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, which can result in unwarranted patient concern or even mismanagement. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the literature and describe an approach to appendiceal neoplasms that more clearly denotes their biologic risk.

Sessile Serrated Lesion of the Appendix in a Teenage Girl

According to the literature, serrated lesions and polyps of the appendix are extremely rare in children or teenagers. Herein, we present the pathologic and molecular features of a sessile serrated lesion (SSL) that was incidentally found in the appendix of a teenage girl. Our findings not only illustrate that appendiceal SSL may occur in young patients such as teenagers but also confirm further that BRAF V600E mutation may be found in a subset of these neoplastic lesions.

Differential diagnosis of appendiceal serrated lesions and polyps and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: analysis of 88 cases

PURPOSE

To identify clinicopathological features for the differential diagnosis of appendiceal serrated lesions and polyps (SPs) and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) for the purpose of avoiding over-diagnosis.

METHODS

Clinical data and pathological features of 66 patients with SPs diagnosed at the Aerospace Center Hospital between January 2013 and January 2021 were collected and compared to 22 cases of LAMN.

RESULTS

SPs, compared with LAMN, are likely to be associated with acute inflammation (SPs 53.0% vs. LAMN 18.2%), and may be located in the appendix partly, although with smaller diameter (average 9.6 vs. 27.2 mm); epithelial structures of serrated (100% vs. 22.7%) and filiform villous (47.0% vs. 18.2%) were often found in SPs. SPs occasionally show attenuated or flattened morphology (16.7% vs. 100%) and undulating or scalloped (7.6% vs. 40.9%) structures, and can also be accompanied by diverticulum (18.2% vs. 18.2%) and acellular mucin in the appendiceal wall (16.7% vs. 54.5%), which causes confusion with LAMN. The key point of the differential diagnosis is to observe whether the muscularis mucosa exists (loss, 0% vs. 100%) and fibrosis of the appendiceal wall (0% vs. 100%). SMA immunohistochemistry can assist in the diagnosis. Calcification is also indicative of LAMN.

CONCLUSIONS

The epithelial structure of SPs can appear flattened and focally scalloped, and can be accompanied by mucin in the appendiceal wall, which may appear as complex lesions, easily over-diagnosed as LAMN. Key differential diagnostic features are identifying the structure of lamina propria, determining whether the muscularis mucosa exists, and whether the appendiceal wall is fibrotic.

Molecular profiling of appendiceal serrated lesions, polyps and mucinous neoplasms: a single-centre experience

PURPOSE

Non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix are a phenotypically heterogeneous group of lesions; a comprehensive molecular characterization of these tumors is still lacking.

METHODS

A total of 52 samples taken from 49 patients was evaluated: 18 sessile serrated lesions (SSL; 3 with dysplasia), 2 high-grade tubular adenomas, 1 tubulo-villous adenoma,1 hyperplastic polyp, 18 low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN), 3 high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (HAMN) and 9 mucinous adenocarcinomas. Hotspot mutational profiling of the RNF43, SMAD4, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes was performed. Expression of p53, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

KRAS was the most frequently mutated gene (53.9% of cases), followed by RNF43 (15.4%), and BRAF (13.5%). In particular: KRAS was mutated in 44.4% of adenocarcinomas, 66.7% of HAMNs, 61.1% of LAMNs, 53.3% of SSL without dysplasia and in 66.7% of SSL with dysplasia; RNF43 was mutated in 33.3% of adenocarcinomas, 66.7% of HAMNs, 11.1% of LAMNs and in 6.7% of SSL without dysplasia; BRAF was mutated in 11.1% of adenocarcinomas, 26.7% of SSL without dysplasia and in 5.6% of LAMNs. Only a case of high-grade tubular adenoma showed mismatch repair deficiency, while immunohistochemical expression of p53 was altered in 21.1% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological phenotypic similarities between appendicular mucinous lesions and serrated colon lesions do not reflect a similar genetic landscape. Mismatch repair deficiency is a rare event during appendiceal mucinous carcinogenesis.

The 2019 World Health Organization Classification of appendiceal, colorectal and anal canal tumours: an update and critical assessment

The recently published 5th edition 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System brings significant changes from the 2010 4th edition. An emphasis on uniformity in nomenclature and grading for tumours across all organ systems is a particular feature of the 5th edition blue book series that is reflected in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) classification. For example, simplified two tiered grading is reinforced for preinvasive lesions throughout the GIT, with dysplasia at all sites now being considered either low or high grade. Similarly, a uniform approach to classification and grading of GIT neuroendocrine neoplasms has been consolidated, with an emphasis on distinguishing grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours from neuroendocrine carcinomas. In this review, we discuss and critically assess the important and sometimes controversial changes made to the classification of tumours of the lower GIT, comprising the colorectum, vermiform appendix and anal canal. The particularly controversial decision to endorse the term 'sessile serrated lesion' for lesions previously termed 'sessile serrated polyp/adenoma' is explored. The morphological, molecular, and clinical insights behind the substitution of the term 'goblet cell adenocarcinoma' for 'goblet cell carcinoid' are assessed. The evolution of the classification of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms is considered. Inflammatory bowel disease related dysplasia and its evolving subtypes, with major implications for pathologists in routine practice, is explained.

The Frontiers of Appendiceal Controversies: Mucinous Neoplasms and Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms show a range of morphologic features and biological risk. At one end of the spectrum, high-grade adenocarcinomas are cytologically malignant with infiltrative invasion, lymph node metastases, and behavior similar to that of extra-appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas. At the other end, mucinous neoplasms confined to the mucosa are uniformly benign. Some cases lying between these extremes have potential risk to metastasize within the abdomen despite a lack of malignant histologic features. They show "diverticulum-like," pushing invasion of mostly low-grade epithelium through the appendix with, or without, concomitant organizing intra-abdominal mucin. The latter condition, widely termed "pseudomyxoma peritonei," tends to pursue a relentless course punctuated by multiple recurrences despite cytoreductive therapy, culminating in death for many patients. The combination of bland histologic features and protracted behavior of peritoneal disease has led some authors to question whether these metastatic tumors even represent malignancies. The World Health Organization and its cadre of experts widely promote usage of "low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm" as an umbrella term to encompass benign and malignant conditions, as well as those that have uncertain biological potential. Although this practice greatly simplifies tumor classification, it causes confusion and consternation among pathologists, clinical colleagues, and patients. It also increases the likelihood that at least some patients will undergo unnecessary surveillance for, and treatment of, benign neoplasms and non-neoplastic conditions. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the relevant literature and discuss a practical approach to classifying appendiceal mucinous neoplasms that more closely approximates their biological risk.

Correlation of molecular and morphological features of appendiceal epithelial neoplasms

AIMS

The aims of this study were to identify the genetic features of appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and correlate the genetic features with morphology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the genetic features of a series of 47 appendiceal epithelial neoplasms of various morphologies by using targeted next-generation sequencing of 11 genes commonly mutated in gastrointestinal neoplasms. Seven of nine serrated polyps harboured BRAF mutations, which are rare in other types of appendiceal tumours. Most cases of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) exhibited GNAS and KRAS mutations. LAMNs with a coexisting serrated polyp were all KRAS mutated. Four LAMNs with mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, either through inactivating mutations in APC or RNF43 or activating mutations in CTNNB1, had focal proliferation of mucin-poor low-grade tumour cells, reminiscent of colorectal adenomas. Mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway were also identified in high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, suggesting that Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is the driving force for the progression of LAMN to a higher-grade lesion. Adenomatous polyps of the appendix frequently had APC, KRAS and TP53 mutations and were morphologically and molecularly similar to adenomatous polyps of the colorectum.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate a close association between morphology and genetic events in appendiceal neoplasms and suggest a phylogenetic relationship between different entities.

Knowledge gaps in the appendix: a multi-institutional study from seven academic centers

Appendix pathology represents uncommonly encountered specimens with unique diagnostic challenges. To delineate common knowledge gaps, extramural consults submitted to seven institutions between 2016-2017 were reviewed. All appendix consults were resections (100%, n = 43), and the majority were directed for consultation by the originating pathologist (95%, n = 41) with no additional studies performed by the consultant (65%, n = 28). This study was dominated by inquiries related to low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (44%, n = 19) and goblet cell carcinoid related neoplasms (19%, n = 8). Of the 43 appendiceal consults, 19 were submitted by the contributing pathologist as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, but only half of these were diagnosed by the consultant as such (n = 9). Low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm-related consultation themes included diverticular disease, criteria for invasion, high grade atypia, extra-appendiceal mucin, and staging. Examples of major disagreements that were downgraded included consults submitted as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and diagnosed by the consultant as serrated polyp (n = 3), appendicitis (n = 1), and benign appendix (n = 1). Examples of major disagreements-upgraded included cases submitted as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and diagnosed by the consultant as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with high-risk features (n = 2) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 2). One case contained both a major disagreement-upgrade (low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm changed to high grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm) and a major disagreement-downgrade (pT3 changed to Tis). Of the 15 cases diagnosed by the consultants as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, submitted diagnoses included low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 9), adenocarcinoma (n = 5), and one case was submitted without a diagnosis. For goblet cell carcinoid-related consults, the usual inquiry related to distinguishing goblet cell carcinoid from goblet cell carcinoid with adenocarcinoma (adenocarcinoma ex-goblet cell carcinoid). Of the 38 overall consults with a submitted diagnosis, 53% (n = 20) were disagreements, and most of these were major disagreements-downgraded (n = 13).

Molecular Diagnostics in the Neoplasms of Small Intestine and Appendix: 2018 Update

Neoplasms of the small intestine are rare in comparison with colorectal tumors. The most common tumor types arising in the small intestine are adenocarcinomas, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and lymphoma. Primary appendiceal neoplasms are rare and found in less than 2% of appendectomy specimens with an incidence of approximately 1.2 cases per 100,000 people per year in the United States. This article explores molecular diagnostics in the neoplasms of small intestine and appendix.

An Update on the Diagnosis, Grading, and Staging of Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms

Despite advances in our understanding of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and their relationship to the pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome, the classification of mucinous tumors of the appendix is still confusing. This review will provide an update on the various classification systems that have been recently proposed for appendiceal mucinous neoplasia, with a particular emphasis on how to handle and report the histologic findings for these tumors using the newly published Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition guidelines. A simplified approach to diagnostic reporting of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms based on the 3-tier AJCC grading scheme is detailed and specific criteria for assessing grade in appendiceal mucinous neoplasia will be outlined. In addition, histologic mimics of appendiceal mucinous neoplasia and how to distinguish these mimics from mucinous neoplasia will be discussed. Finally, despite improvements in diagnostic terminology, significant challenges in classifying appendiceal mucinous neoplasia persist and diagnostic strategies will be detailed to assist practicing pathologists in these challenging scenarios.

The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei

The vermiform appendix is the primary site of several distinctive benign and malignant neoplasms. Some can produce the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). A consensus on their terminology was reached by an international panel of pathologists and clinicians working under the auspices of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), and this review discusses the application of the PSOGI classification to routine reporting. We discuss diagnosis and differential diagnosis together with implications for patient management, covering low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, serrated polyps, adenomas and adenocarcinomas. We do not cover goblet cell tumours or neuroendocrine neoplasms in this paper.

Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care

CONTEXT

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma are known to cause the majority of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP, i.e. mucinous ascites); however, recognition and proper classification of these neoplasms can be difficult despite established diagnostic criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pathological diagnostic concordance for appendix neoplasia and related lesions during patient referral to an academic medical center specialized in treating patients with PMP.

DESIGN

The anatomic pathology laboratory information system was searched to identify cases over a two-year period containing appendix specimens with mucinous neoplasia evaluated by an outside pathology group and by in-house slide review at a single large academic medical center during patient referral.

RESULTS

161 cases containing appendix specimens were identified over this period. Forty-six of 161 cases (28.6%) contained appendiceal primary neoplasia or lesions. Of these, the originating pathologist diagnosed 23 cases (50%) as adenocarcinoma and 23 cases (50%) as LAMN; however, the reference pathologist diagnosed 29 cases (63.0%) as LAMN, 13 cases (28.3%) as adenocarcinoma, and 4 cases (8.7%) as ruptured simple mucocele. Importantly, for cases in which the originating pathologist rendered a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, the reference pathologist rendered a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma (56.5%, 13 of 23), LAMN (39.1%, 9 of 23), or simple mucocele (4.3%, 1 of 23). The overall diagnostic concordance rate for these major classifications was 71.7% (33 of 46) with an unweighted observed kappa value of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27-0.69), consistent with moderate interobserver agreement. All of the observed discordance (28.3%) for major classifications could be attributed to over-interpretation. In addition, the majority of LAMN cases (65.5%) had potential diagnostic deficiencies including over-interpretation as adenocarcinoma and lacking or discordant risk stratification (i.e. documentation of extra-appendiceal neoplastic epithelium).

CONCLUSIONS

Appendiceal mucinous lesions remain a difficult area for appropriate pathological classification with substantial discordance due to over-interpretation in this study. The findings highlight the critical need for recognition and application of diagnostic criteria regarding these tumors. Recently published consensus guidelines and a checklist provided herein may help facilitate improvement of diagnostic concordance and thereby reduce over-interpretation and potential overtreatment. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this phenomenon and its potential clinical impact.

Immunohistochemistry - microarray analysis of patients with peritoneal metastases of appendiceal or colorectal origin

BACKGROUND

The value of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-microarray analysis of pathological specimens in the management of patients is controversial, although preliminary data suggest potential benefit. We describe the characteristics of patients undergoing a commercially available IHC-microarray method in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) and the feasibility of this technique in this population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed PM from appendiceal or colorectal primary who underwent Caris Molecular Intelligence(™) testing. IHC, microarray, FISH, and mutational analysis were included and stratified by Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) score, histology, and treatment characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

Our study included 5 patients with appendiceal and 11 with colorectal PM. The median age of patients was 51 (IQR 39-65) years, with 11 (68%) female. The median PCI score of the patients was 17 (IQR 10-25). Hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemoperfusion was performed in 4 (80%) patients with appendiceal primary tumors and 4 (36%) with colorectal primary. KRAS mutations were encountered in 40% of appendiceal vs. 30% colorectal tumors, while BRAF mutations were seen in 40% of colorectal PM and none of the patients with appendiceal PM (p = 0.06). IHC biomarker expression was not significantly different between the two primaries. Sufficient tumor for microarray analysis was found in 44% (n = 7) patients, which was not associated with previous use of chemotherapy (p > 0.20 for 5-FU/LV, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin).

CONCLUSION

In a small sample of patients with PM, the feasibility and results of IHC-microarray staining based on a commercially available test is reported. The apparent high incidence of the BRAF mutation in patients with PM may potentially offer opportunities for novel therapeutics and suggest that IHC-microarray is a method that can be used in this population.

Clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: identification of factors predicting survival and proposed criteria for a three-tiered assessment of tumor grade

Previous studies have demonstrated that the prognosis of disseminated mucinous appendiceal neoplasms is highly dependent upon tumor grade. Reflecting this, the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system now incorporates a three-tier grading system for prognostic staging of mucinous appendiceal tumors. However, the grading criteria are not well described. In order to address this issue, we evaluated clinicopathologic and molecular features of 219 cases from 151 patients with widely disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasia treated at our institution between 2004 and 2012. We identified histologic features that were associated with worse overall survival on univariate analysis: destructive invasion, high cytologic grade, high tumor cellularity, angiolymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, and signet ring cell component (all with P<0.0001). We used these morphologic characteristics to classify neoplasms into three grades: AJCC grade G1 lacked all adverse histologic features; AJCC grade G2 had at least one adverse histologic feature (except a signet ring cell component); and AJCC grade G3 were defined by the presence of a signet ring cell component. Patients with AJCC grade G2 and grade G3 adenocarcinomas had a significantly worse prognosis compared with AJCC grade G1 (P<0.0001 for each). A trend toward worse overall survival was identified for patients with AJCC grade G3 adenocarcinomas compared with AJCC grade G2 adenocarcinomas (P=0.07). Our multivariate analysis found that this three-tier grading system was a significant predictor of outcome (P=0.008), independent of other prognostic variables. After controlling for other prognostic variables, AJCC grade G2 was associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk of death (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-6.2) and AJCC grade G3 was associated with a 5.1-fold increased risk of death (95% CI, 1.7-14) relative to grade G1 tumors. Our results indicate that evaluation of a limited set of adverse histologic features allows for the separation of disseminated mucinous neoplasms of appendiceal origin into three morphologically defined and prognostically relevant grades as advocated by the AJCC.

DNA damage response and its clinicopathological relationship in appendiceal tumors

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal tumors are rare, and their pathogenesis is not well known. DNA damage response (DDR) is a sequence from the detection of damaged DNA to the repair, and its impairment is implicated in the progression of cancers. The aim of the current study is to explore the expression and phosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and TP53, which are key molecules in DDR, and their clinicopathological correlation in the appendiceal tumors.

METHODS

Chk2, phosphorylated Chk2 (pChk2), and TP53 were immunostained in 4 cases of adenoma (AD), 5 non-mucinous adenocarcinomas (AC), 29 low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN), and 7 mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC). Ki-67 labeling index was also evaluated by immunostaining.

RESULTS

Chk2 was highly expressed in the nuclei of all the appendiceal tumors. While pChk2 was high in AD, LAMN, and MAC, it was reduced in AC. Nuclear positive reaction of TP53 was lower in LAMN compared with those of other tumors. The Ki-67 labeling index was slightly lower in LAMN than those in other tumors. The recurrence and death in LAMN is infrequent compared with those in AC and MAC.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggested the impairment of DDR in AC and MAC. DDR appeared to be preserved in LAMN, and it may account for low proliferating activity and a favorable clinical course in LAMN.

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma associated with adjacent sessile serrated lesion of the appendix vermiform: a case report

Although the definition of sessile serrated lesion (SSL) of colon is controversial and the risk of progression to malignancy is also under investigation at present, SSL is generally described as a polyp characterized by a serrated architecture. It is estimated to represent a feature of a new cancerization pathway, coined "serrated neoplasia pathway," particularly in right-sided colon adenocarcinomas. On the other hand, in appendix, the role of this pathway remains uncertain, probably because very few cases of appendiceal adenocarcinoma associated with SSL were reported, and furthermore, immunohistochemical examination was rarely carried out. We herein report an interesting case of invasive appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma exhibiting SSL, which was pathologically estimated as a potential precursor lesion, and performed representative immunohistochemistry for both the mucinous adenocarcinoma and SSL in the same specimen. To further elucidate the progression of the appendiceal carcinoma from SSL, both an adequate sectioning of the lesion and systematic immunohistochemical examination of a large number of appendiceal carcinoma cases containing adjacent SSL would be required.

High-level microsatellite instability in appendiceal carcinomas

High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-high) is found in approximately 15% of all colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs) and in at least 20% of right-sided cancers. It is most commonly due to somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 gene promoter region, with familial cases (Lynch syndrome) representing only 2% to 3% of CRCs overall. In contrast to CRC, MSI-high in appendiceal adenocarcinomas is rare. Only 4 MSI-high appendiceal carcinomas and 1 MSI-high appendiceal serrated adenoma have been previously reported, and the prevalence of MSI in the appendix is unknown. We identified 108 appendiceal carcinomas from MD Anderson Cancer Center in which MSI status had been assessed by immunohistochemistry for the DNA mismatch-repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 (n=83), polymerase chain reaction (n=7), or both (n=18). Three cases (2.8%) were MSI-high, and 1 was MSI-low. The 3 MSI-high cases included: (1) a poorly differentiated nonmucinous adenocarcinoma with loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression, lack of MLH1 promoter methylation, and lack of BRAF gene mutation, but no detected germline mutation in MLH1 from a 39-year-old man; (2) an undifferentiated carcinoma with loss of MSH2/MSH6, but no detected germline mutation in MSH2 or TACSTD1, from a 59-year-old woman; and (3) a moderately differentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in a villous adenoma with loss of MSH2/MSH6 expression, in a 38-year-old man with a strong family history of CRC who declined germline testing. When the overall group of appendiceal carcinomas was classified according to histologic features and precursor lesions, the frequencies of MSI-high were: 3 of 108 (2.8%) invasive carcinomas, 3 of 96 (3.1%) invasive carcinomas that did not arise from a background of goblet cell carcinoid tumors, and 0 of 12 (0%) signet ring and mucinous carcinomas arising in goblet cell carcinoid tumors. These findings, in conjunction with the previously reported MSI-high appendiceal carcinomas, highlight the low prevalence of MSI in the appendix as compared with the right colon and suggest that MLH1 promoter methylation is not a mechanism for MSI in this location.

Inflammatory bowel disease biopsies: updated British Society of Gastroenterology reporting guidelines

Accurate histopathological assessment of biopsies is important for the diagnosis, subclassification, and management of chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for the initial histopathological diagnosis of IBD were published in 1997. Changes since then include: more widespread use of full colonoscopy; greater recognition of the effects of time and treatment; improved documentation of variations in anatomical distribution; better understanding of the mimics of IBD; significant progress in clinical management; and modifications of terminology. Accordingly, an update is required. These revised guidelines aim to optimise the quality and consistency of reporting of biopsies taken for the initial diagnosis of IBD by summarising the literature and making recommendations based on the available evidence. Advice from existing clinical guidelines is also taken into account. Among the subjects discussed are: distinguishing IBD from other colitides, particularly infective colitis; subclassification of IBD (as ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, or IBD unclassified); the discriminant value of granulomas; aspects of disease distribution, including discontinuity in ulcerative colitis; time-related changes; differences between paediatric and adult IBD; the role of ileal and upper gastrointestinal biopsies; differential diagnoses such as diverticular colitis and diversion proctocolitis; and dysplasia. The need to correlate the histological features with clinical and endoscopic findings is emphasised. An approach to the conclusion of an IBD biopsy report based on the acronym Pattern, Activity, Interpretation, Dysplasia (PAID) is suggested. The key recommendations are listed at the end of the document.

Significance of acquired diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix: a marker of regional neoplasms?

AIM

To assess the prevalence of acquired diverticulum of the appendix (DA), including incipient forms and its possible significance as a marker of local/regional neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pathology database at Hvidovre Hospital was searched for appendix specimens, received between 2001 and 2010, coded for DA or for a space-occupying lesion. Slides were reviewed to determine DA status and the nature of lesions possibly causing DA.

RESULT

Among 4413 appendix specimens, DA were identified in 39 (0.9%, CI 0.6% to 1.2%) cases, 17 (43.6%, 28.0% to 59.2%) of which additionally harboured an appendiceal neoplasm/neoplastic precursor, whereas this figure was 1.2% (CI 0.9% to 1.6%) for non-DA specimens (p<0.0001). Six of the 39 DA specimens comprised incipient DA, three of which coexisted with appendiceal neoplasms. In addition, local/regional non-neoplastic lesions (six cases) and colorectal carcinomas (four cases) coexisted with DA.

CONCLUSION

DA has significance as a putative marker of local/regional neoplasms. Therefore, a DA specimen proved significantly more likely to harbour a neoplastic growth than a non-DA counterpart. Submission for microscopy of the entire DA specimen, whether transmural or only incipient, and a comment in the pathology report on the occasional concurrence of local/regional neoplasms in this setting seem appropriate. The observation of DA may thus provide a valuable contribution in the diagnostic process.

Ki-ras gene mutations are invariably present in low-grade mucinous tumors of the vermiform appendix

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade mucinous tumors of the appendix appear to have a simple histological structure. Paradoxically, reports have suggested a greater frequency of Ki-ras gene mutation in these lesions than in more complex lesions such as benign colonic adenomas and carcinomas. We assessed several molecular genetic changes, including Ki-ras gene mutations, in a large series of low-grade mucinous tumors of the appendix.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively ascertained low-grade mucinous tumors of the appendix from computerized pathology records. Extracted DNA was analyzed for APC and DCC gene loss of heterozygosity, microsatellite instability and for the presence of Ki-ras gene mutation using standard molecular techniques. Controls consisted of normal appendices, other appendiceal neoplasms, and ovarian mucinous cystadenomas.

RESULTS

A total of 31 low-grade appendiceal mucinous tumors were identified. All were microsatellite stable and none demonstrated loss of heterozygosity for the APC or DCC genes. By contrast, all 31 lesions contained a Ki-ras gene mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a Ki-ras gene mutation in all lesions, with no other molecular changes identified, strongly suggests a possible etiological role of the Ki-ras mutation in the development of this particular lesion of the appendix. Based on other work regarding intestinal bacteria, we hypothesize a relationship between chronic inflammation of the appendix from bacterial overgrowth and Ki-ras gene mutation.

Serrated lesions of the appendix: a morphologic and immunohistochemical appraisal

We performed a histologic and immunohistochemical assessment of 53 noninvasive appendiceal epithelial proliferations, appropriating terminology and using markers shown useful in differentiating serrated colorectal polyps. These were classified as hyperplastic polyp (HP), sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), mixed serrated and adenomatous lesion (MSAL), mucinous cystadenoma (MCA), or conventional adenoma (CAD). Immunohistochemical analysis for cytokeratin (CK) 20, Ki-67, MUC6, and beta-catenin was performed. Diagnoses were as follows: HP, 6; SSA, 12; HP vs SSA, 3; MSAL, 16; MCA, 14; and CAD, 2. All HPs showed expanded (beyond surface) CK20 and expanded or normal (base) Ki-67; 1 was MUC6+. Most SSAs and MSALs were CK20-expanded or expanded with random expression in deep crypts (Ex/I) and Ki-67-expanded, Ex/I (expanded with asymmetry), or normal. All SSAs and 8 of 16 MSALs were MUC6+. CADs were CK20-Ex/I, Ki-67-Ex, and MUC6-; 1 showed nuclear beta-catenin expression. Serrated appendiceal lesions can be categorized using colorectal terminology. MUC6 is associated with SSA morphologic features. Similar immunohistochemical patterns in SSA and MSAL suggest a link between these lesions.

An appendiceal neoplastic lesion: case report and implications for colonoscopic screening and surveillance

A 65-year-old man with a history of previously resected colonic adenomas had an apparent cecal lesion detected during colonoscopy. The polyp proved to be a tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia involving most of the body of the appendix along with the base of the cecum. The appendiceal mucosa is biologically similar to the colonic mucosa, yet remains relatively 'hidden' in screening and surveillance studies, which suggests important implications for evolving detection strategies in the follow-up of patients with a previous colon polyp or cancer resections. Although endoscopic removal of the appendix has been reported, treatment of these localized appendiceal lesions requires a wide surgical excision.

Pathologic features and biologic importance of colorectal serrated polyps

Serrated polyps of the large intestine comprise a heterogeneous group of mucosal lesions that includes nondysplastic polyps, such as hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated polyps, and polyps that show overt cytologic dysplasia, namely serrated adenomas and mixed hyperplastic/adenomatous polyps. These polyps have received increased recognition over the past 2 decades, as emerging evidence suggests that a subset may be precursors to colorectal carcinomas that lack chromosomal instability. Several investigators have proposed the concept of the "serrated neoplastic pathway" according to which nondysplastic serrated lesions develop progressively severe dysplasia culminating in the development of microsatellite unstable carcinomas that show DNA hypermethylation and BRAF mutations. A subset of hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated polyps show mutations in the BRAF gene and abnormal DNA methylation, which can, ultimately, affect the promoter regions of key DNA-repair and tumor suppressor genes, such as MLH1 and MGMT, leading to their decreased transcription and microsatellite instability. On the basis of this hypothesis, many authors have proposed that sessile serrated polyps should be treated and surveilled similar to conventional adenomas, although prospective data are lacking. This review describes the clinicopathologic and molecular features of serrated polyps and discusses the current data regarding their biologic significance.

Observations on a vestigial organ: a potential surrogate for enteric neuromesenchymal disease

Abnormalities of enteric nerves, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and smooth muscle are often associated with severe gastrointestinal motility disorders. In this context, full-thickness biopsy of the gut may provide important diagnostic and prognostic clues as well as some possible therapeutic implications. Nonetheless, the unavoidable risk to further worsen prognosis evoked by laparotomy, and the unclear yield of histopathological analysis has hampered full-thickness gut sampling in patients with severe dysmotility. However, recent advances in minimally invasive surgery have refuelled enthusiasm in gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology. In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Miller et al. provide novel and exciting evidence that the appendix might be used as a surrogate tissue to analyse changes to enteric nerves, ICC and smooth muscle cells in patients with diabetic gastroenteropathy. The objective of this short review was to place this very important work in the context of current understanding of enteric neuromuscular dysfunction.

Hyperplastic/serrated polyposis in inflammatory bowel disease: a case series of a previously undescribed entity

Herein, we describe the clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 3 unique patients with long standing inflammatory bowel disease, all of whom developed numerous discrete hyperplastic/serrated colonic polyps similar to those described in the hyperplastic/serrated polyposis syndrome. The 3 patients (2 with ulcerative colitis and 1 with Crohn ileo-colitis) were evaluated for a variety of clinical, histologic (including the type, location and number of polyps in the colon), and immunohistochemical features [MLH-1, MSH-2, MGMT (O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase), beta-catenin, and p53]. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis was also performed on a subset of polyps from 2 patients. All patients had moderate-severe pancolitis of more than 10 years duration and had >20 colonic polyps. None had polyps in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Pathologically, a combination of conventional hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated polyps (adenomas) were present in the 3 cases. In addition, serrated adenomas were present in 2 and conventional adenomas in 1. Two patients also had synchronous adenocarcinoma. All 3 cases showed retention of MLH-1 and MSH-2, and a membranous beta-catenin staining pattern. However, 2 cases showed loss of MGMT in several serrated polyps, and one also in adjacent colitic mucosa. KRAS mutations were detected in 5/11 serrated polyps. However, BRAF mutations were not present in any of the polyps tested. These findings suggest the possibility of a serrated pathway of carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease characterized by silencing of MGMT, most likely by gene promoter methylation, KRAS mutations, and possibly other, as yet, uncharacterized molecular alterations, resulting eventually in progression to adenocarcinoma.