Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the pleura: report of a unique case with genetic confirmation

Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Background

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) is a rare subtype of gastrointestinal stromal tumor, with limited information on its clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. This study aims to identify the risk factors affecting survival in EGIST patients and to develop a prognostic nomogram for predicting EGIST-specific survival (TSS).

Methods

Patients diagnosed with EGIST, aged 18 to 80, were enrolled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Research Plus database, covering the years 2000 to 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for developing a nomogram. The predictive accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and the concordance index. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the nomogram's clinical utility and net benefit for application in clinical practice. Additionally, the nomogram's performance was compared with the tumor SEER stage.

Results

A total of 389 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, household income, surgery, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SEER stage as significant predictors of TSS (all P<0.05). These factors were incorporated into the prognostic nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated superior prognostic value compared to the tumor SEER stage alone, as evidenced by the area under the curve and concordance index. The calibration plot indicated a high level of accuracy in forecasting survival probabilities. Furthermore, DCA highlighted the nomogram's clinical applicability and positive net benefit. The nomogram also proved more effective than the tumor SEER stage alone in identifying patients with poorer prognoses.

Conclusions

Age, household income, surgery, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SEER stage were identified as risk factors for TSS in patients with EGIST. We have developed and validated a prognostic nomogram to predict TSS in EGIST patients, which may improve patient management and guide personalized medical treatment for EGIST.

Nonmesothelial Spindle Cell Tumors of Pleura and Pericardium

Spindle cell lesions of the pleura and pericardium are rare. Distinction from sarcomatoid mesothelioma, which has a range of morphologic patterns, can be difficult, but accurate diagnosis matters. This article provides practical guidance for the diagnosis of pleural spindle cell neoplasms, focusing on primary lesions.

Ki-67 labelling index is related to the risk classification and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive tract with malignant potential. The current risk classification standard is unable to accurately evaluate the invasiveness and clinical outcomes of GISTs. Ki-67 labelling index (LI) may be an effective indicator in assessing tumour invasiveness and prognosis, however, its exact value in GISTs is still uncertain. The aims of our study were to evaluate the correlation of the Ki-67 LI and clinicopathological features of GISTs and to assess the potential value of the Ki-67 LI in GISTs classification and prognosis.

METHODS

The clinical, pathological and prognostic data were collected and analysed to identify the independent influential factors of GISTs risk stratification and the predictors of GISTs prognosis.

RESULTS

The Ki-67 LI was significantly associated with the clinicopathological features of tumour progression (P<0.05). It was an independent influential factor of GISTs risk classification (odds ratio: 1.322; 95% confidence interval: 1.031-1.696) (P=0.028), and the area under the curve (AUC) value of the Ki-67 LI on the discrimination ability of GISTs risk stratification was 0.906 (P<0.001). The optimal cutoff value of the Ki-67 LI was 6% (sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 76.2%), and patients with Ki-67 LI≥6% exhibited significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with Ki-67 LI<6% (P<0.001). The AUC value of the Ki-67 LI for predicting PFS in postoperative patients was 0.813 (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ki-67 LI has appreciated value to predict the risk grade and prognosis of GISTs. Patients with Ki-67 LI≥6% are prone to recurrence and metastasis after operation and may need a close follow-up.

Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as an Isolated Lung Mass

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, representing a small portion of soft tissue tumors of the abdominal cavity. Extraintestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are uncommon forms of GISTs that present outside the GI tract. There have only been a rare number of reported cases of EGIST presenting above the diaphragm. We present the case of a 50-year-old female with shortness of breath, and found to have bilateral pleural effusions and left-sided lung mass. The initial lung mass aspiration was negative for malignancy; yet, pleural fluid was suggestive of malignancy, and repeat biopsy and immunohistochemical stain were diagnostic for GIST. Ultimately, the patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, pleurodesis with doxycycline, and adjuvant therapy with imatinib. This is a report of primary EGIST presenting as an isolated lung lesion with no involvement of the GI tract. In patients with suspected malignancy, it is of paramount importance to obtain a detailed history, including remote signs and symptoms, while performing a thorough work-up. Especially in the lung where initial biopsies can be skewed due to inflammation and atelectasis, repeat biopsies may be necessary to obtain an accurate diagnosis.

Recurrent and metastatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumors of the mesentery with C-KIT and PDGFRA mutations: a case report

EGISTs originating outside the gastrointestinal tract share some similarities with the GISTs regarding their immunohistochemical features including the positive expression of CD117 and CD34. The majority of EGISTs carry activating mutations of the C-KIT or PDGFRA genes. However, there is no precedent in the literature where the two mutations occur in one case of EGISTs to date. We describe herein, a 52-year-old female who presented as mesenteric and pelvic regions masses showing positive immunoreactivity for CD117, DOG-1, CD34. Mutation analysis identified two mutations that located in the exon 13 of C-KIT and in the exon 18 of PDGFRA. The patient was treated sequentially with imatinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, and regorafenib. However, the prognosis was undesirable. Previous research has shown that expression of members of Bcl-2 family may be helpful in predicting prognosis, the survival time, and the resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. IHC was performed to detect the expression of BCL-2 family. The results show that high BCL-2 expression and low BAX expression in both specimens. In conclusion, our case may suggest that the presence of both C-KIT and PDGFRA mutations in EGISTs patients may indicate a very poor prognosis; and the expression level of BCL-2 and BAX could predict clinical outcome.

NKX2.2, PDX-1 and CDX-2 as potential biomarkers to differentiate well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) most frequently arise from the gastrointestinal tract (GI), pancreas, and lung. Patients often present as metastasis with an unknown primary, and the clinical management and outcome depend on multiple factors, including the accurate diagnosis with the tumor primary site. Determining the site of the NET with unknown primary remains challenging. Many biomarkers have been investigated in primary NETs and metastatic NETs, with heterogeneous sensitivity and specificity observed.

Methods

We used high-throughput tissue microarray (TMA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) with antibodies against a panel of transcriptional factors including NKX2.2, PDX-1, PTF1A, and CDX-2 on archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded NETs, and investigated the protein expression pattern of these transcription factors in 109 primary GI (N = 81), pancreatic (N = 17), and lung (N = 11) NETs.

Results

Differential expression pattern of these markers was observed. In the GI and pancreatic NETs (N = 98), NKX2.2, PDX-1, and CDX-2 were immunoreactive in 82 (84%), 14 (14%), and 52 (52%) cases, respectively. PDX-1 was expressed mainly in the small intestinal and appendiceal NETs, occasionally in the pancreatic NETs, and not in the colorectal NETs. All three biomarkers including NKX2.2, PDX-1, and CDX-2 were completely negative in lung NETs. PTF1A was expressed in all normal and neuroendocrine tumor cells.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that NKX2.2 was a sensitive and specific biomarker for the GI and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We proposed that a panel of immunostains including NKX2.2, PDX-1, and CDX-2 may show diagnostic utility for the most common NETs.

What is New in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor?

The classification "gastrointestinal stromal tumor" (GIST) became commonplace in the 1990s and since that time various advances have characterized the GIST lineage of origin, tyrosine kinase mutations, and mechanisms of response and resistance to targeted therapies. In addition to tyrosine kinase mutations and their constitutive activation of downstream signaling pathways, GISTs acquire a sequence of chromosomal aberrations. These include deletions of chromosomes 14q, 22q, 1p, and 15q, which harbor putative tumor suppressor genes required for stepwise progression from microscopic, preclinical forms of GIST (microGIST) to clinically relevant tumors with malignant potential. Recent advances extend our understanding of GIST biology beyond that of the oncogenic KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinases and beyond mechanisms of KIT/PDGFRA-inhibitor treatment response and resistance. These advances have characterized ETV1 as an essential interstitial cell of Cajal-GIST transcription factor in oncogenic KIT signaling pathways, and have characterized the biologically distinct subgroup of succinate dehydrogenase deficient GIST, which are particularly common in young adults. Also, recent discoveries of MAX and dystrophin genomic inactivation have expanded our understanding of GIST development and progression, showing that MAX inactivation is an early event fostering cell cycle activity, whereas dystrophin inactivation promotes invasion and metastasis.

Primary Extragastrointestinal Stromal Tumours in the Hepatobiliary Tree and Telocytes

The first decade of the twenty-first century witnessed the presence and light microscopic, immunophenotypic, and ultrastructural characterization of interstitial Cajal-like cells (coined as 'telocytes') in virtually every extragastrointestinal site of the human body by Laurentiu M. Popescu and his co-workers. Not surprisingly, stromal tumours, immunophenotypically similar to that of telocytes [CD117 (c-KIT) +/CD34 +], have also been sporadically reported outside the tubular gut (so-called extragastrointestinal stromal tumours, EGISTs), including the gall bladder, liver, and pancreas. A meticulous literature search from January 2000 to November 2015 have found 9 such case reports of EGISTs in the gall bladder, 16 in the liver, and 31 occurring in the pancreas. The site wise mean age at presentation for these tumours were reported to be 62.2 ± 16.6, 50.9 ± 20.1, and 55.3 ± 14.3 years, respectively. Six of nine EGISTs in the gall bladder were associated with gallstones. On pathological evaluation, these tumours exhibited prominent spindled cell morphology and consistent expression of CD117/c-KIT and CD34 on immunohistochemistry and variable expression of vimentin and α-smooth muscle actin. The biological behaviour of hepatic and pancreatic lesions was favourable compared to that in the gall bladder, following definitive surgery with or without imatinib therapy. While the exact pathophysiologic role played by telocytes in various organs is yet to be fully elucidated, there seems to be a direct link between these enigmatic stromal cells and pathogenesis of gallstones and origin of EGISTs, and a hope for targeted therapies. Furthermore, the possible role of telocytes in hepatic regeneration and liver fibrosis opens a new dimension for futuristic research.

Using molecular diagnostic testing to personalize the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has emerged as a paradigm for modern cancer treatment ('precision medicine'), as it highlights the importance of matching molecular defects with specific therapies. Over the past two decades, the molecular classification and diagnostic work up of GIST has been radically transformed, accompanied by the development of molecular therapies for specific subgroups of GIST. This review summarizes the developments in the field of molecular diagnosis of GIST, particularly as they relate to optimizing medical therapy. Areas covered: Based on an extensive literature search of the molecular and clinical aspects of GIST, the authors review the most important developments in this field with an emphasis on the differential diagnosis of GIST including mutation testing, therapeutic implications of each molecular subtype, and emerging technologies relevant to the field. Expert commentary: The use of molecular diagnostics to classify GIST has been shown to be successful in optimizing patient treatment, but these methods remain under-utilized. In order to facilitate efficient and comprehensive molecular testing, the authors have developed a decision tree to aid clinicians.

Targeting pancreatic expressed PAX genes for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Four members of the PAX family, PAX2, PAX4, PAX6 and PAX8 are known to be expressed in the pancreas. Accumulated evidences indicate that several pancreatic expressed PAX genes play a significant role in pancreatic development/functionality and alterations in these genes are involved in the pathogenesis of pancreatic diseases. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the ongoing research related to pancreatic PAX genes in diabetes mellitus and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We dissect the current knowledge at different levels; from mechanistic studies in cell lines performed to understand the molecular processes controlled by pancreatic PAX genes, to in vivo studies using rodent models that over-express or lack specific PAX genes. Finally, we describe human studies associating variants on pancreatic-expressed PAX genes with pancreatic diseases. Expert opinion: Based on the current literature, we propose that future interventions to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and diabetes mellitus could be developed via the modulation of PAX4 and/or PAX6 regulated pathways.

Is DOG1 Immunoreactivity Specific to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor?

BACKGROUND

DOG1 is a novel gene on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that encodes the chloride channel protein anoctamin 1, also known as discovered on GIST-1 (DOG1) protein. DOG1 antibodies are a sensitive and specific marker against GIST positive for CD117 and CD34 and negative for CD117 and CD34. DOG1 is also independent of KIT or PDGFRA mutation status and considered specific for GIST when it was first discovered in 2004.

METHODS

The previous 10 years of literature was searched for articles relating to DOG1. We critically reviewed 12 studies that showed DOG1 was positive in 250 cases of 2,360 tested non-GIST neoplasms (10.6%) at different anatomical sites using monoclonal, polyclonal, or nonspecified antibodies. Criteria for positivity varied between the studies.

RESULTS

Monoclonal and polyclonal DOG1 antibodies were reactive in various different non-GIST tumor types spanning 9 organ systems in addition to normal salivary and pancreatic tissues. The tumors included were renal oncocytoma (100%), renal cell carcinoma chromophobe type (86%), solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (51%), neoplastic salivary tissue (17%), synovial sarcoma (15%), leiomyoma (10%), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (7%), and leiomyosarcoma (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

By contrast to the original concept that DOG1 antibodies are specific to GIST neoplasms, the studies reviewed showed that the data suggest DOG1 positivity in select non-GIST tumors. Only in the appropriate clinical and pathological context is DOG1 positivity specific and helpful in the diagnosis of GIST.

Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the pleura: A case report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common type of mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The stomach and small intestine are the most common sites of occurrence. GISTs are mesenchymal neoplasms originating from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), and are characterized by positivity for cluster of differentiation (CD) 117, also known as proto-oncogene c-Kit. While the majority of GISTs develop in the alimentary tract, in rare cases they may also be found in extragastrointestinal tissues. This type of GIST is known as an extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST). Despite the fact that EGISTs have been reported in the mesentery, omentum and retroperitoneum, primary intrathoracic EGISTs, arising from the pleura or lungs, are rare. The patient presented in the current study was a 40-year-old man, who presented with a cough and pyrexia, with pleural effusion on the left side. Multiple nodules throughout the parietal pleura were identified by thoracoscopy and a diagnosis of primary GIST of pleura was established, since they were positive for CD117 and discovered on GIST-1 and there was no evidence of gastrointestinal tumors. Subsequently, the patient was administered with imatinib and had no signs of disease recurrence 2 years later.

Primary pericardial extragastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report and literature review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most prevalent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs are considered to originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal, the pacemakers of the peristaltic activity of the gastrointestinal tract. More than 95% of GISTs express KIT protein and discovered on GIST-1. GISTs may also be encountered in locations outside the gastrointestinal tract, in which case they are referred to as extra-GISTs (EGISTs) and often behave more aggressively. This is the case report of a primary pericardial EGIST in a 53-year-old male patient, confirmed by immunohistochemistry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third case of EGIST diagnosed above the diaphragm, without being associated with the esophageal wall. Two cases of primary EGIST arising from the pleura were reported previously. In addition, this is the first reported case of an EGIST originating from the pericardium.

Retrospective analysis of extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM: To investigate the clinicopathologic features of patients with extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) in South Korea.

METHODS: A total of 51 patients with an EGIST were identified. The clinicopathologic features, including sex, age, location, tumor size, histology, mitotic rate, immunohistochemical features, genetic status and survival data, were analyzed.

RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (range: 29-80 years), and male:female ratio was 1:1.04. The most common site was in the mesentery (n = 15) followed by the retroperitoneum (n = 13) and omentum (n = 8). The median tumor size was 9.0 cm (range: 2.6-30.0 cm) and the median mitotic rate was 5.0/50HPF. (1/50 - 185/50). KIT was analyzed in 16, which revealed 10 cases with wild-type KIT and 6 cases with an exon 11 mutation. Among 51 patients, 31 patients had undergone surgery, and 10 had unresectable disease and had taken palliative imatinib, which resulted in 22.7 mo of progression-free survival. Of the patients who had undergone surgery, 18 did not take adjuvant imatinib, and 8 of these were categorized as “high risk” according to the risk criteria. However, the relapse-free survival was not different (P = 0.157) between two groups.

CONCLUSION: Because the biologic behaviors of GISTs differ according to the location of the tumor, a more stratified strategy is required for managing EGISTs including incorporation of molecular features.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: recent advances in pathology and genetics

The discovery of KIT gene mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has provided a paradigm shift in the classification, diagnosis and molecular-targeted therapy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors. There is growing evidence of phenotype-genotype (KIT, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha, succinate dehydrogenase or other driver gene mutation) and genotype-therapeutic (sensitivity to imatinib) correlations in GIST. Risk stratification based on mitotic counts, tumor size and rupture is useful for the prognostication and management of patients with GIST. Blood vessel invasion is a strong indicator of liver metastasis in GIST. In addition, novel biomarkers such as cell-cycle regulators, microRNAs and their targets have been discovered by using high throughput molecular analyses. In contrast, leiomyosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract has become a very rare entity in the 'KIT' era, and its molecular pathogenetic mechanism is unclear. Recent studies have revealed a wide spectrum of cytological atypia, mitotic counts and biological behavior of gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors, suggesting the necessity of establishing the criteria for malignancy. Collectively, both classical histopathological procedures and modern molecular investigations are indispensable for the evolution of diagnosis and treatment of GIST and mimics.

Bladder extragastrointestinal stromal tumor in an adolescent patient: A case-based review

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are mesenchymal tumors occurring outside the gastrointestinal tract, with histological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characteristics similar to those of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The immunohistochemical examination usually demonstrates a positive expression for CD117. GISTs are rare neoplasms and EGISTs are even less common. This is the report of a case of EGIST in the urinary bladder of a 15-year-old adolescent female patient who presented with painless gross hematuria. Pelvic computed tomography revealed an irregular soft tissue density mass, sized 5.7×4.8 cm, in the bladder. Partial cystectomy was performed in April, 2011. There was no recurrence during follow-up over the next 35 months, as determined by transabdoninal ultrasonography and cystoscopic examination. The patient in this study did not receive any molecular-targeted drugs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an EGIST of the urinary bladder in an adolescent patient.

The changing face of GIST: implications for pathologists

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is now recognised as the most common primary mesenchymal tumour of the gut. A number of different parameters have been identified to aid prediction of clinical behaviour, but prognostication for an individual remains difficult. The pathologist plays a crucial role in guiding management of these tumours, but is faced with a number of challenges in so doing. This review describes the variable pathological features that may be encountered, and examines some of the issues in the pathology reporting of GIST and attempts to provide some guidance in factors that should be addressed in a comprehensive pathology report.

A 92-gene cancer classifier predicts the site of origin for neuroendocrine tumors

A diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma is often morphologically straight-forward; however, the tumor site of origin may remain elusive in a metastatic presentation. Neuroendocrine tumor subtyping has important implications for staging and patient management. In this study, the novel use and performance of a 92-gene molecular cancer classifier for determination of the site of tumor origin are described in a series of 75 neuroendocrine tumors (44 metastatic, 31 primary; gastrointestinal (n=12), pulmonary (n=22), Merkel cell (n=10), pancreatic (n=10), pheochromocytoma (n=10), and medullary thyroid carcinoma (n=11)). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples passing multicenter pathologist adjudication were blinded and tested by a 92-gene molecular assay that predicts tumor type/subtype based upon relative quantitative PCR expression measurements for 87 tumor-related and 5 reference genes. The 92-gene assay demonstrated 99% (74/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.99) accuracy for classification of neuroendocrine carcinomas and correctly subtyped the tumor site of origin in 95% (71/75; 95% CI 0.87-0.98) of cases. Analysis of gene expression subsignatures within the 92-gene assay panel showed 4 genes with promising discriminatory value for tumor typing and 15 genes for tumor subtyping. The 92-gene classifier demonstrated excellent accuracy for classifying and determining the site of origin in tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation. These results show promise for use of this test to aid in classifying neuroendocrine tumors of indeterminate primary site, particularly in the metastatic setting.

Comparative immunohistochemical analysis of pulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas using PAX8 and TTF-1

PAX8 is expressed in thymic epithelial neoplasms and a subset of neuroendocrine carcinomas of gastrointestinal origin but not pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) is known to be positive in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas, but studies investigating its expression in thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas are lacking. To date, there are no comprehensive studies focusing on the comparative expression of PAX8 or TTF-1 in pulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Twenty-five cases of low and intermediate grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of pulmonary and thymic origin, respectively, were selected for immunohistochemical studies using antibodies directed against PAX8 and TTF-1. The percentage of positive tumor cells as well as the intensity of staining were evaluated and scored. Twenty-one of the pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas were classified as low grade (typical carcinoid) and 4 as intermediate grade (atypical carcinoid) tumors; the thymic tumors consisted of 8 low grade and 17 intermediate grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. Only 2 (8%) of the pulmonary tumors showed nuclear expression of PAX8 while 19 (76%) expressed TTF-1. Of the thymic tumors, 8 (32%) were positive for PAX8 and 2 (8%) showed TTF-1 positivity. Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the thymus are rare neoplasms that display a more aggressive clinical course than pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas, highlighting the importance of the separation of these tumors. To date, there are no specific immunomarkers to distinguish between neuroendocrine carcinomas of pulmonary and thymic origin. The differential expression of PAX8 and TTF-1 may prove useful in this context as a PAX8+/TTF-1- immunophenotype appears to be more common in thymic neuroendocrine carcinomas, whereas the reverse (PAX8-/TTF-1+) is true for most pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas.

The primary extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of pleura: a case report and a literature review

The gastrointestinal stromal tumor is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. The gastrointestinal stromal tumor universally expresses KIT and DOG-1 and frequently harbors oncogenic mutations in the KIT gene. While the gastrointestinal stromal tumor usually arises in the alimentary tract, it is rarely found in the extragastrointestinal area. When it is, it is called an extragastrointestinal stromal tumor. Although the pathogenesis, prognostic factors and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors are well known, those of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors have not been fully studied. We report, herein, a unique primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor from the pleura in a 73-year-old woman who presented with pleural mass. The extragastrointestinal stromal tumor was surgically resected and confirmed by means of an immunohistochemical study and a molecular analysis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: molecular markers and genetic subtypes

Mutation-activated signaling from the KIT and PDGFRA kinases has been successfully targeted in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with subtle differences between the mutations serving to refine prognosis and more precisely tailor therapy. There is a growing understanding of the molecular drivers of GISTs lacking mutations in KIT or PDGFRA, so called wild-type GISTs, further aiding in management decisions. This article provides an overview of all the known molecular subtypes of GIST and provides information about clinical correlates, treatment, and prognosis depending on the subtype.

Intra-abdominal fibromatosis: differentiation from gastrointestinal stromal tumour based on biphasic contrast-enhanced CT findings

AIM

To identify the computed tomography (CT) criteria that differentiate intra-abdominal fibromatosis (IAF) from gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT images of 34 pathologically proven cases of IAF (n = 15) and GIST (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed. Location, contour, border, enhancement pattern, presence of necrosis, vessels, and air within the lesion were analysed. Long diameter (LD), short diameter (SD), LD/SD ratio, degree of enhancement, and lesion/aorta (L/A) CT attenuation ratio were measured and calculated. Significant CT criteria were identified using Fisher's exact test, grouped t-test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated when single or multiple CT criteria were used.

RESULTS

Extra-gastrointestinal location, ovoid or irregular contour, homogeneous enhancement, absence of intra-lesional necrosis, lower degree of enhancement, and L/A CT attenuation ratio differentiated IAF from GIST (p < 0.05). When any three of these eight criteria were combined, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing IAF were 100% (15 of 15) and 89.5% (17 of 19), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The following eight CT criteria are helpful to differentiate IAF from GIST: extra-gastrointestinal location, ovoid or irregular contour, homogeneous enhancement, absence of intra-lesional necrosis, a degree of enhancement of less than 40.5 HU in the arterial phase versus 46.5 HU in the portal venous phase, and an L/A CT attenuation ratio <0.315 in the arterial phase versus 0.525 in the portal phase.

Pax8 has a critical role in epithelial cell survival and proliferation

The transcription factor Pax8, a member of the Paired-box gene family, is a critical regulator required for proper development and differentiation of thyroid follicular cells. Despite being Pax8 well characterized with respect to its role in regulating genes responsible for thyroid differentiation, its involvement in cell survival and proliferation has been hypothesized but remains unclear. Here, we show that Pax8 overexpression significantly increases proliferation and colony-forming efficiency of Fischer rat thyroid line 5 epithelial cells, although it is not sufficient to overcome their hormone dependence. More interestingly, we show that Pax8-specific silencing induces apoptosis through a p53-dependent pathway that involves caspase-3 activation and cleavage of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase. Our data indicate that tumor protein 53 induced nuclear protein 1 (tp53inp1), a positive regulator of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, is a transcriptional target of Pax8 and is upregulated by Pax8 knockdown. Remarkably, tp53inp1 silencing significantly abolishes Pax8-induced apoptosis thus suggesting that tp53inp1 may be the mediator of the observed effects. In conclusion, our data highlight that Pax8 is required for the survival of differentiated epithelial cells and its expression levels are able to modulate the proliferation rate of such cells.

Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a well recognized and relatively well understood soft tissue tumor. Early events in GIST development are activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA, which occur in most GISTs and encode for mutated tyrosine receptor kinases that are therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib and sunitinib. A small minority of GISTs possessing neither KIT nor PDGFRA mutations may have germline mutations in SDH, suggesting a potential role of SDH in the pathogenesis. Immunohistochemical detection of KIT, and more recently DOG1, has proven to be reliable and useful in the diagnosis of GISTs. Because current and future therapies depend on pathologists, it is important that they recognize KIT-negative GISTs, GISTs in specific clinical contexts, GISTs with unusual morphology, and GISTs after treatment. This review focuses on recent developments in the understanding of the biology, immunohistochemical diagnosis, the role of molecular analysis, and risk assessment of GISTs.

Soft tissue tumors of uncertain origin

Many soft tissue tumors of childhood lack obvious differentiation toward a defined mesenchymal tissue type or have a phenotype that does not correspond to any defined normal tissue. These challenging tumors are currently regarded as neoplasms of uncertain differentiation. Nonetheless, there have been great strides in the understanding of their pathologic and genetic features and biologic underpinnings. The application of new genetic information to the pathologic diagnosis among this group of tumors is an emerging area in diagnostic pediatric pathology. This article reviews the clinicopathologic features of tumors of uncertain and/or miscellaneous origin, with an emphasis on the unique aspects of these neoplasms in children and adolescents, use of diagnostic adjuncts, and differential diagnosis.

Value of Islet 1 and PAX8 in identifying metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin

Neuroendocrine tumors can present as liver metastases before discovery of the primary tumor. Islet 1 and PAX8 have recently been proposed as markers for neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin. In this study, we compared the utility of Islet 1 and PAX8 in distinguishing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine tumors of other sites and determined the usefulness of an immunohistochemical panel, including TTF1, CDX2, Islet 1 and/or PAX8, in identifying metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. A total of 110 primary neuroendocrine tumors (33 pancreatic, 31 pulmonary, 23 ileal, 14 rectal, and 9 gastric) and 73 metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (28 pancreatic, 5 pulmonary, 37 ileal, 1 rectal, 1 colonic, and 1 duodenal) were studied. Islet 1 and PAX8 were positive in 27/33 (82%) and 29/33 (88%), respectively, of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and in 19/28 (68%) and 15/28 (54%), respectively, of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. No cases of primary (0/23) or metastatic (0/37) ileal neuroendocrine tumors were positive with either Islet 1 or PAX8. There was Islet 1 positivity in 2/31 (6%) primary pulmonary, 12/14 (86%) primary rectal, and 1/1 metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumors, and PAX8 positivity in 7/31 (23%) primary pulmonary, 11/14 (79%) primary rectal, and 2/9 (22%) primary gastric neuroendocrine tumors. ROC curve analysis incorporating sensitivity and specificity data of immunohistochemical panels for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors showed that a four-stain panel, including Islet 1, PAX8, TTF1, and CDX2 significantly outperformed a three-stain panel composed of PAX8, TTF1, and CDX2 (P=0.019), and also showed a trend for better performance compared with a three-stain panel composed of Islet 1, TTF1, and CDX2 (P=0.072). Both Islet 1 and PAX8 are reliable immunohistochemical markers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and would be useful adjuncts to other markers (TTF1, CDX2) currently used to work up a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided diagnosis of subepithelial tumors

Subepithelial lesions are frequently discovered during routine endoscopic examinations. These lesions represent a wide spectrum of heterogeneous benign to malignant conditions. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic. There is no consensus regarding how to manage these lesions. Over the last 2 decades, the approach to these lesions has significantly improved owing to the introduction of endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration, immunohistochemical staining methods, and different treatment options. This article discusses the nature of subepithelial lesions, focusing on the most recent developments that use endoscopic ultrasonography to diagnose and manage these lesions.

Islet organogenesis, angiogenesis and innervation

The pancreas is characterized by a major component, an exocrine and ductal system involved in digestion, and a minor component, the endocrine islets represented by islet micro-organs that tightly regulate glucose homoeostasis. Pancreatic organogenesis is strictly co-ordinated by transcription factors that are expressed sequentially to yield functional islets capable of maintaining glucose homoeostasis. Angiogenesis and innervation complete islet development, equipping islets to respond to metabolic demands. Proper regulation of this triad of processes during development is critical for establishing functional islets.

Predictors of response to targeted therapies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

CONTEXT

The inhibition of oncogenic kinase signaling is a successful strategy to treat both hematologic and solid malignancies. Patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, lung adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors are experiencing tremendous clinical benefits from targeted therapies in the form of kinase inhibitors. These drugs marked a revolution in cancer treatment, not only for their safety and efficacy, but also because they continue to expand our knowledge of the pathophysiology of cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a summary of the biologic predictors of gastrointestinal stromal tumor behavior and response to targeted therapies that currently help guide clinical decision making.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles pertaining to the diagnosis, molecular genetics, prognostication, clinical behavior, and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, as well as experiences in a multidisciplinary sarcoma clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the strongest predictor of response to targeted therapies is the mutational status of KIT or PDGFRA. Patients whose tumors harbor a KIT exon 11 mutation benefit the most from imatinib mesylate therapy, in terms of response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Conversely, tumors without detectable mutations in either gene ("wild-type" gastrointestinal stromal tumors) are generally not responsive to imatinib mesylate.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours--an update for histopathologists

This review aims to summarize recent knowledge gained about gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of particular relevance to histopathologists. KIT and PDGFRA mutation analyses can be useful for confirming a diagnosis of GIST, but there are some diagnostic limitations to these analyses, and so immunohistochemical markers currently remain crucial to the diagnostic process. Of these markers, CD117 and Discovered on GIST 1 (DOG1) are currently the most sensitive and specific markers of GIST, and recent data appear to disprove the fear that antigen retrieval causes false-positive CD117 immunostaining. The accurate prognostication of GIST has been greatly helped by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) classification systems, although both systems still have limitations, and the behaviours of certain GIST subgroups are less well predicted by both systems. KIT and PDGFRA mutation analyses can help to predict the response of GISTs to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and both GISTs that respond and those that show resistance to these inhibitors may show characteristic pathological changes. Some GIST subgroups (e.g. Carney syndrome and paediatric GISTs) have had recently described clinicopathological and/or molecular characteristics which may help with the diagnosis and/or treatment of these specific neoplasms.

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) on transurethral resection of the prostate: a case report and review of the literature

Gastrointesinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and they show differentiation towards interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). Herein, we describe a case of a 60-year-old man presenting with symptoms mimicking adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate that was subjected to repeated transurethral prostatectomies. Histologic and immunohistochemical examination showed a neoplastic process with characteristics consistent with GIST. Imaging studies confirmed a rectal origin of the tumor. Review of the literature revealed 20 cases of GISTs occurring in the prostate gland, either diagnosed as either primary GISTs or, more commonly, as rectal neoplasms extending to this organ. We add our case in this short list, emphasizing on the importance of inclusion of GISTs in the differential diagnosis of every spindle cell lesion encountered in the prostate.

PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic tissues, primary tumors, and metastatic tumors: a comprehensive immunohistochemical study

PAX 8 is a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the kidney, Müllerian organs, and thyroid. It may also have a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX 8 has not been comprehensively studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples for non-neoplastic tissues (n=1601), primary neoplasms (n=933), and metastatic neoplasms (n=496) were subjected to PAX 8 immunostain. In non-neoplastic tissues, PAX 8 was consistently noted in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting ductal cells, atrophic renal tubular epithelial cells regardless of nephronic segments, and epithelial cells of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, seminal vesicle, epidydimis, thyroid, pancreatic islet cells, and lymphoid cells. PAX 8 was not seen in the rest of the tissue samples. In primary neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 194 of 240 (89%) renal cell neoplasms, by 238 of 267 (89%) Müllerian-type neoplasms, by 65 of 65 (100%) thyroid follicular cell neoplasms, by 8 of 8 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and by 17 of 17 (100%) lymphomas. Weak focal staining was noted in 5 of 12 (42%) cases of parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma and in 6 of 17 (35%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. PAX 8 was not seen in other neoplasms. In metastatic neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 90 of 102 (88%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, by 57 of 63 metastatic Müllerian tumors (90%), and by 6 of 6 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas (100%). There was also weak focal staining for 1 of 15 metastatic small cell carcinomas and for 1 of 9 metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PAX 8 was not seen in other metastatic neoplasms. It can be successfully identified in routinely processed tissue samples, and its expression is mostly nuclear. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissues is limited to the organs, the embryonic development of which depends on this transcription factor. This tissue/cell-specific expression is maintained during both neoplastic transformation and metastasis. PAX 8 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal, Müllerian, or thyroid origin in both primary and metastatic sites.

PAX8 promotes tumor cell growth by transcriptionally regulating E2F1 and stabilizing RB protein

The retinoblastoma protein (RB)–E2F1 pathway has a central role in regulating the cell cycle. Several PAX proteins (tissue-specific developmental regulators), including PAX8, interact with the RB protein, and thus regulate the cell cycle directly or indirectly. Here, we report that PAX8 expression is frequent in renal cell carcinoma, bladder, ovarian and thyroid cancer cell lines, and that silencing of PAX8 in cancer cell lines leads to a striking reduction in the expression of E2F1 and its target genes, as well as a proteasome-dependent destabilization of RB protein, with the RB1 mRNA level remaining unaffected. Cancer cells expressing PAX8 undergo a G₁/S arrest and eventually senesce following PAX8 silencing. We demonstrate that PAX8 transcriptionally regulates the E2F1 promoter directly, and E2F1 transcription is enhanced after RB depletion. RB is recruited to the PAX8-binding site, and is involved in PAX8-mediated E2F1 transcription in cancer cells. Therefore, our results suggest that, in cancer, frequent and persistent expression of PAX8 is required for cell growth control through transcriptional activation of E2F1 expression and upregulation of the RB–E2F1 pathway.

PAX8 expression reliably distinguishes pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors from ileal and pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma

PAX (paired box) genes encode a family of transcription factors that regulate organogenesis in a variety of organs. Very little is known about the role of PAX8 in endocrine cell development and the expression of PAX8 in neuroendocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to analyze PAX8 immunohistochemical expression in gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors to determine whether PAX8 can reliably distinguish pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from neuroendocrine tumors of other anatomic sites and other pancreatic non-ductal neoplasms. In total, 221 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were evaluated: 174 primary neuroendocrine tumors (66 pancreatic, 31 ileal, 21 pulmonary, 20 gastric, 17 rectal, 11 appendiceal, and 8 duodenal) and 47 neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver (31 pancreatic, 11 ileal, 2 pulmonary, 2 duodenal, and 1 rectal). Fifteen solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms and six acinar cell carcinomas of the pancreas were also evaluated. PAX8 was positive in 49/66 (74%) primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. PAX8 expression did not correlate with World Health Organization categorization, grade, size, functional status, or the presence of liver or lymph node metastasis. PAX8 expression was identified in 0/31 (0%) ileal, 0/21 (0%) pulmonary, 2/20 (10%) gastric, 5/17 (29%) rectal, 1/11 (9%) appendiceal, and 6/8 (75%) duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. PAX8 was positive in 4/15 (27%) solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas, whereas all acinar cell carcinomas (0/6) lacked immunoreactivity. Among liver metastases, only pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (20/31, 65%) were PAX8 positive, whereas no cases of ileal (0/11), pulmonary (0/2), duodenal (0/2), and rectal (0/1) neuroendocrine tumor metastases were PAX8 positive. PAX8 is expressed in primary and metastatic pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, and its expression can reliably distinguish pancreatic from ileal and pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors and a subset of rectal, gastric, and appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors may also express PAX8. PAX8 expression can distinguish pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from acinar cell carcinomas, but its utility in distinguishing neuroendocrine tumors from solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms is limited.