1
|
Kuhl CK, Keulers A, Strobel K, Schneider H, Gaisa N, Schrading S. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20:13. [PMID: 29426360 PMCID: PMC5807753 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0937-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to frequently result in false-positive diagnoses, limiting its positive predictive value (PPV). However, for PPV calculation, all nonmalignant tissue changes are equally considered false-positive, although the respective prognostic importance, and thus patient management implications, of different pathologies may well differ. We investigated the pathology of false-positive diagnoses made by MRI compared with radiographic (digital mammography/tomosynthesis [DM/DBT]) screening. Methods We conducted an institutional review board-approved prospective analysis of 710 consecutive asymptomatic women at average risk for breast cancer who underwent vacuum biopsy with or without surgical biopsy for screen-detected DM/DBT (n = 344) or MRI (n = 366) findings. We compared the frequency of false-positive biopsies (given by PPV3), as well as the types of nonmalignant tissue changes that caused the respective false-positive biopsies. In an order of increasing relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, pathologies of false-positive biopsies were categorized as nonproliferative, simple proliferative, complex proliferative, or atypical proliferative (including lobular carcinoma in situ/lobular intraepithelial neoplasia). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare distributions. Results Histology yielded nonmalignant tissue in 202 of 366 biopsies done for positive MRI studies and 195 of 344 biopsies for positive DM/DBT studies, respectively, yielding a similar PPV3 percentages of 44.8% (164 of 202) and 43.3% (149 of 202) for both methods. However, the distribution of tissue types that caused false-positive diagnoses differed significantly (p < 0.0001). On the basis of MRI, high-risk atypical proliferative changes (40.1%; 81 of 202) were most common, followed by complex proliferative changes (23.8%; 48 of 202). In DM/DBT, low-risk, nonproliferative changes were the dominant reason for false-positive diagnoses (49.7%; 97 of 195), followed by simple proliferative changes (25.2%; 51 of 195). Low-risk nonproliferative changes resulted in false-positive diagnoses based on MRI as infrequently as did high-risk atypical proliferative changes based on DM/DBT (18.8% [38 of 202] vs. 18.0% [35 of 195]). The likelihood of a false-positive diagnosis including atypias was twice as high in women undergoing biopsy for MRI findings (81 of 202; 40%) as for those with DM/DBT findings (35 of 195; 18%). Conclusions The prognostic importance, and thus the clinical implications, of false-positive diagnoses made on the basis of breast MRI vs. radiographic screening differed significantly, with a reversed prevalence of high- and low-risk lesions. This should be taken into account when discussing the rate of false-positive diagnoses (i.e., PPV levels of MRI vs. radiographic screening). Current benchmarks that rate the utility of breast cancer screening programs (i.e., cancer detection rates and PPVs) do not reflect these substantial biological differences and the different prognostic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Annika Keulers
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Kevin Strobel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hannah Schneider
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nadine Gaisa
- Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Simone Schrading
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsang JY, Tse GM. Microglandular adenosis: a prime suspect in triple-negative breast cancer development. J Pathol 2017; 239:129-32. [PMID: 27061094 DOI: 10.1002/path.4726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Microglandular adenosis (MGA) and atypical MGA (AMGA) are unusual lesions of the breast. They were once regarded as benign proliferative lesions and innocent bystanders. Several lines of evidence suggested that they could be neoplastic, clonal lesions and a non-obligate precursor for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). Recent work published in The Journal of Pathology by Guerini-Rocco and colleagues provided further evidence regarding the precursor-product relationship between MGA/AMGA and TNBC. Using a massively parallel sequencing approach, they demonstrated that MGA/AMGA, particularly those associated with TNBC, could be clonal neoplastic lesions showing clonal non-synonymous mutations, but none in pure MGA. Importantly, those alterations were observed in the associated TNBC. They were also able to identify recurrent alterations in TP53 in those MGA/AMGA cases as well as their associated TNBC. The findings, in conjunction with others, underscore the significance for MGA in clinical diagnosis. The potential of a benign lesion to progress into an aggressive malignant tumour implies that modification of the current management approach may be necessary. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ys Tsang
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
| | - Gary Mk Tse
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burrai GP, Tanca A, Cubeddu T, Abbondio M, Polinas M, Addis MF, Antuofermo E. A first immunohistochemistry study of transketolase and transketolase-like 1 expression in canine hyperplastic and neoplastic mammary lesions. BMC Vet Res 2017; 13:38. [PMID: 28143530 PMCID: PMC5282725 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-0961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Canine mammary tumors represent the most common neoplasm in female dogs, and the discovery of cancer biomarkers and their translation to clinical relevant assays is a key requirement in the war on cancer. Since the description of the ‘Warburg effect’, the reprogramming of metabolic pathways is considered a hallmark of pathological changes in cancer cells. In this study, we investigate the expression of two cancer-related metabolic enzymes, transketolase (TKT) and transketolase-like 1 (TKTL1), involved in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), an alternative metabolic pathway for glucose breakdown that could promote cancer by providing the precursors and energy required for rapidly growing cells. Results TKT and TKTL1 protein expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry in canine normal (N = 6) and hyperplastic glands (N = 3), as well as in benign (N = 11) and malignant mammary tumors (N = 17). TKT expression was higher in hyperplastic lesions and in both benign and malignant tumors compared to the normal mammary gland, while TKTL1 levels were remarkably higher in hyperplastic lesions, simple adenomas and simple carcinomas than in the normal mammary glands (P < 0.05). Conclusions This study reveals that the expression of a key PPP enzyme varies along the evolution of canine mammary neoplastic lesions, and supports a role of metabolic changes in the development of canine mammary tumors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0961-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Pietro Burrai
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tanca
- Porto Conte Ricerche, S.P. 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia Km 8.400, Loc, 07041, Tramariglio, Alghero, Italy
| | - Tiziana Cubeddu
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marcello Abbondio
- Porto Conte Ricerche, S.P. 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia Km 8.400, Loc, 07041, Tramariglio, Alghero, Italy
| | - Marta Polinas
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy
| | - Maria Filippa Addis
- Porto Conte Ricerche, S.P. 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia Km 8.400, Loc, 07041, Tramariglio, Alghero, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Antuofermo
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wahler J, So JY, Kim YC, Liu F, Maehr H, Uskokovic M, Suh N. Inhibition of the transition of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma by a Gemini vitamin D analog. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2014; 7:617-26. [PMID: 24691501 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-13-0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonmalignant lesion of the breast with the potential to progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The disappearance and breakdown of the myoepithelial cell layer and basement membrane in DCIS have been identified as major events in the development of breast cancer. The MCF10DCIS.com cell line is a well-established model, which recapitulates the progression of breast cancer from DCIS to IDC. We have previously reported that a novel Gemini vitamin D analog, 1α,25-dihydroxy-20R-21(3-hydroxy-3-deuteromethyl-4,4,4-trideuterobutyl)-23-yne-26,27-hexafluoro-cholecalciferol (BXL0124) is a potent inhibitor of the growth of MCF10DCIS.com xenografted tumors without hypercalcemic toxicity. In this study, we utilized the MCF10DCIS.com in vivo model to assess the effects of BXL0124 on breast cancer progression from weeks 1 to 4. Upon DCIS progression to IDC from weeks 3 to 4, tumors lost the myoepithelial cell layer and basement membrane as shown by immunofluorescence staining with smooth muscle actin and laminin 5, respectively. Administration of BXL0124 maintained the critical myoepithelial cell layer as well as basement membrane, and animals treated with BXL0124 showed a 43% reduction in tumor volume by week 4. BXL0124 treatment decreased cell proliferation and maintained vitamin D receptor levels in tumors. In addition, the BXL0124 treatment reduced the mRNA levels of matrix metalloproteinases starting at week 3, contributing to the inhibition of invasive transition. Our results suggest that the maintenance of DCIS plays a significant role in the cancer preventive action of the Gemini vitamin D BXL0124 during the progression of breast lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Wahler
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Jae Young So
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Yeoun Chan Kim
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Fang Liu
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New JerseyAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New JerseyAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Hubert Maehr
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Milan Uskokovic
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Nanjoo Suh
- Authors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New JerseyAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy; Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway; and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|