Professional Responsibility, Consensus, and Conflict: A Survey of Physician Decisions for the Chronically Critically Ill in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units

Perspectives on non-emergent neonatal intensive care unit to pediatric intensive care unit care transfers in the United States

BACKGROUND

There is a substantial population of long-stay patients who non-emergently transfer directly from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without an interim discharge home. These infants are often medically complex and have higher mortality relative to NICU or PICU-only admissions. Given an absence of data surrounding practice patterns for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers, we hypothesized that we would encounter a broad spectrum of current practices and a high proportion of dissatisfaction with current processes.

AIM

To characterize non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices across the United States and query PICU providers' evaluations of their effectiveness.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was drafted, piloted, and sent to one physician representative from each of 115 PICUs across the United States based on membership in the PARK-PICU research consortium and membership in the Children's Hospital Association. The survey was administered via internet (REDCap). Analysis was performed using STATA, primarily consisting of descriptive statistics, though logistic regressions were run examining the relationship between specific transfer steps, hospital characteristics, and effectiveness of transfer.

RESULTS

One PICU attending from each of 81 institutions in the United States completed the survey (overall 70% response rate). Over half (52%) indicated their hospital transfers patients without using set clinical criteria, and only 33% indicated that their hospital has a standardized protocol to facilitate non-emergent transfer. Fewer than half of respondents reported that their institution's non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices were effective for clinicians (47%) or patient families (38%). Respondents evaluated their centers' transfers as less effective when they lacked any transfer criteria (P = 0.027) or set transfer protocols (P = 0.007). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that having set clinical criteria and standardized protocols for non-emergent transfer were important to the patient-family experience and patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Most hospitals lacked any clinical criteria or protocols for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers. More positive perceptions of transfer effectiveness were found among those with set criteria and/or transfer protocols.

Development of a checklist for evaluation of shared decision-making in consultation for extremely preterm delivery

OBJECTIVE

Shared decision-making (SDM) between parents facing extremely preterm delivery and the medical team is recommended to develop the best course of action for neonatal care. We aimed to describe the creation and testing of a literature-based checklist to assess SDM practices for consultation with parents facing extremely preterm delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

The checklist of SDM counseling behaviors was created after literature review and with expert consensus. Mock consultations with a standardized patient facing extremely preterm delivery were performed, video-recorded, and scored using the checklist. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha were calculated.

RESULT

The checklist was moderately reliable for all scorers in aggregate. Differences existed between subcategories within classes of scorer, and between scorer classes. Agreement was moderate between expert scorers, but poor between novice scorers. Internal consistency of the checklist was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

This novel checklist for evaluating SDM shows promise for use in future research, training, and clinical settings.

How do Clinicians View the Process of Shared Decision-Making with Parents Facing Extremely Early Deliveries? Results from an Online Survey

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to better understand how neonatology (Neo) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians approach the process of shared decision-making (SDM) with parents facing extremely premature (<25 weeks estimated gestational age) delivery during antenatal counseling.

STUDY DESIGN

Attending physicians at U.S. centers with both Neo and MFM fellowships were invited to answer an original online survey about antenatal counseling for extremely early newborns. Preferences for conveying information are reported elsewhere. Here, we report clinicians' self-assessments of their ability to engage in deliberations and decision-making and perceptions of what is important to parents in the SDM process. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed respondents' views with respect to individual characteristics, such as specialty, gender, and years of clinical experience.

RESULTS

In total, 74 MFMs and 167 Neos representing 94% of the 81 centers surveyed responded. Neos versus MFMs reported repeat visits with parents less often (<0.001) and agreed that parents were more likely to have made delivery room decisions before they counseled them less often (p < 0.001). Respondents reported regularly achieving most goals of SDM, with the exception of providing spiritual support. Most respondents reported that spiritual and religious views, risk to an infant's survival, and the infant's quality of life were important to parental decision-making, while a physician's own personal choice and family political views were reported as less important. While many barriers to SDM exist, respondents rated language barriers and family views that differ from those of a provider as the most difficult barriers to overcome.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insights into how consultants from different specialties and demographic groups facilitate SDM, thereby informing future efforts for improving counseling and engaging in SDM with parents facing extremely early deliveries and supporting evidence-based training for these complex communication skills.

KEY POINTS

· Perceptions differed by specialty and demographics.. · Parents' spiritual needs were infrequently met.. · Barriers to shared decision-making exist..

Establishing Goals of Care in Serious and Complex Pediatric Illness

An increasing number of children are living for months and years with serious/complex illness characterized by long-term prognostic uncertainty, intensive interactions with medical systems, functional limitations, and often home medical technologies that shape the child's and family's quality of life. These families face many medical decision points that require intentional and iterative discussions about goals of care. Threats to cohesive goals of care include prognostic uncertainty, diffusion of medical responsibility, individual family context, and blended goals of care. This article offers strategies for addressing each of these challenges.

Home values and experiences navigation track (HomeVENT): Supporting decisions about pediatric home ventilation

Objective

To pilot feasibility and acceptability of HomeVENT, a systematic approach to family-clinician decision-making about pediatric home ventilation.

Methods

Parents and clinicians of children facing home ventilation decisions were enrolled at 3 centers using a pre/post cohort design. Family interventions included: 1) a website describing the experiences of families who previously chose for and against home ventilation 2) a Question Prompt List (QPL); 3) in-depth interviews exploring home life and values. Clinician HomeVENT intervention included a structured team meeting reviewing treatment options in light of the family's home life and values. All participants were interviewed one month after the decision.

Results

We enrolled 30 families and 34 clinicians. Most Usual Care (14/15) but fewer Intervention (10/15) families elected for home ventilation. Families reported the website helped them consider different treatment options, the QPL promoted discussion within the family and with the team, and the interview helped them realize how home ventilation might change their daily life. Clinicians reported the team meeting helped clarify prognosis and prioritize treatment options.

Conclusions

The HomeVENT pilot was feasible and acceptable.

Innovation

This systematic approach to pediatric home ventilation decisions prioritizes family values and is a novel method to increase the rigor of shared decision-making in a rushed clinical environment.

A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Perspectives on Neonatologist Continuity of Care

BACKGROUND

Families and staff in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) value continuity of care (COC), though definitions, delivery, and impacts of COC are incompletely described. Previously, we used parental perspectives to define and build a conceptual model of COC provided by neonatologists. Nursing perspectives about COC remain unclear.

PURPOSE

To describe nursing perspectives on neonatologist COC and revise our conceptual model with neonatal nurse input.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study interviewing NICU nurses. The investigators analyzed transcripts with directed content analysis guided by an existing framework of neonatologist COC. Codes were categorized according to previously described COC components, impact on infants and families, and improvements for neonatologist COC. New codes were identified, including impact on nurses, and codes were classified into themes.

RESULTS

From 15 nurses, 5 themes emerged: (1) nurses validated parental definitions and benefits of COC; (2) communication is nurses' most valued component of COC; (3) neonatologist COC impact on nurses; (4) factors that modulate the delivery of and need for COC; (5) conflict between the need for COC and the need for change. Suggested improvement strategies included optimizing staffing and transition processes, utilizing clinical guidelines, and enhancing communication at all levels. Our adapted conceptual model describes variables associated with COC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Interdisciplinary NICU teams need to develop systematic strategies tailored to their unit's and patients' needs that promote COC, focused to improve parent-clinician communication and among clinicians. Our conceptual model can help future investigators develop targeted interventions to improve COC.

Palliative care for NICU survivors with chronic critical illness

The sickest of NICU survivors develop chronic critical illness (CCI). Most infants with CCI will leave the NICU using chronic medical technology and will experience repeated rehospitalizations. The unique issues for these NICU graduates- escalating chronic medical technologies, fractured post-NICU healthcare, gaps in home health services, and family strain-are common and predictable. This means that raising family and NICU team awareness of these issues, and putting plans in place to address them, should occur for every NICU infant with CCI. Pediatric palliative care is one resource that can be engaged within the NICU to support the child and family through NICU discharge and beyond. This review examines what is known about the unique needs of infants who leave the NICU with CCI and the role that NICU-initiated palliative care involvement can play for these patients, families, clinicians, and the health care system.

Slow and Steady: Optimizing Intensive Care Unit Treatment Weans for Children with Chronic Critical Illness

Pediatric chronic critical illness (PCCI) is characterized by prolonged and recurrent hospitalizations, multiorgan conditions, and use of medical technology. Our prior work explored the mismatch between intensive care unit (ICU) acute care models and the chronic needs of patients with PCCI. The objective of this study was to examine whether the number and frequency of treatment weans in ICU care were associated with clinical setbacks and/or length of stay for patients with PCCI. A retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record for 300 pediatric patients with PCCI was performed at the neonatal intensive care unit, pediatric intensive care unit, and cardiac intensive care unit of two urban children's hospitals. Daily patient care data related to weans and setbacks were collected for each ICU day. Data were analyzed using multilevel mixed multiple logistic regression analysis and a multilevel mixed Poisson regression. The patient-week level adjusted regression analysis revealed a strong correlation between weans and setbacks: three or more weekly weans yielded an odds ratio of 3.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06–5.44) of having one or more weekly setback. There was also a correlation between weans and length of stay, three or more weekly weans were associated with an incidence rate ratio of 1.09 (95% CI = 1.06–1.12). Long-stay pediatric ICU patients had more clinical setbacks and longer hospitalizations if they had more than two treatment weans per week. This suggests that patients with PCCI may benefit from a slower pace of care than is traditionally used in the ICU. Future research to explore the causative nature of the correlation is needed to improve the care of such challenging patients.

Defining Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Children with chronic critical illness (CCI) are hypothesized to be a high-risk patient population with persistent multiple organ dysfunction and functional morbidities resulting in recurrent or prolonged critical care; however, it is unclear how CCI should be defined. The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the existing literature for case definitions of pediatric CCI and case definitions of prolonged PICU admission and to explore the methodologies used to derive these definitions.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science) from inception to March 3, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that provided a specific case definition for CCI or prolonged PICU admission. Crowdsourcing was used to screen citations independently and in duplicate. A machine-learning algorithm was developed and validated using 6,284 citations assessed in duplicate by trained crowd reviewers. A hybrid of crowdsourcing and machine-learning methods was used to complete the remaining citation screening.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted details of case definitions, study demographics, participant characteristics, and outcomes assessed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixty-seven studies were included. Twelve studies (18%) provided a definition for CCI that included concepts of PICU length of stay (n = 12), medical complexity or chronic conditions (n = 9), recurrent admissions (n = 9), technology dependence (n = 5), and uncertain prognosis (n = 1). Definitions were commonly referenced from another source (n = 6) or opinion-based (n = 5). The remaining 55 studies (82%) provided a definition for prolonged PICU admission, most frequently greater than or equal to 14 (n = 11) or greater than or equal to 28 days (n = 10). Most of these definitions were derived by investigator opinion (n = 24) or statistical method (n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric CCI has been variably defined with regard to the concepts of patient complexity and chronicity of critical illness. A consensus definition is needed to advance this emerging and important area of pediatric critical care research.

Initiating technology dependence to sustain a child's life: a systematic review of reasons

BACKGROUND

Decision-making in initiating life-sustaining health technology is complex and often conducted at time-critical junctures in clinical care. Many of these decisions have profound, often irreversible, consequences for the child and family, as well as potential benefits for functioning, health and quality of life. Yet little is known about what influences these decisions. A systematic review of reasoning identified the range of reasons clinicians give in the literature when initiating technology dependence in a child, and as a result helps determine the range of influences on these decisions.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ASSIA and Global Health Library databases were searched to identify all reasons given for the initiation of technology dependence in a child. Each reason was coded as a broad and narrow reason type, and whether it supported or rejected technology dependence.

RESULTS

53 relevant papers were retained from 1604 publications, containing 116 broad reason types and 383 narrow reason types. These were grouped into broad thematic categories: clinical factors, quality of life factors, moral imperatives and duty and personal values; and whether they supported, rejected or described the initiation of technology dependence. The majority were conceptual or discussion papers, less than a third were empirical studies. Most discussed neonates and focused on end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of empirical studies on this topic, scant knowledge about the experience of older children and their families in particular; and little written on choices made outside 'end-of-life' care. This review provides a sound basis for empirical research into the important influences on a child's potential technology dependence.

The Meaning Given to Bioethics as a Source of Support by Physicians Who Care for Children Who Require Long-Term Ventilation

The role and potential of bioethics input when a child requires the initiation of technology dependence to sustain life is relatively unknown. In particular, little is understood about the meaning physicians give to bioethics as a source of support during the care of children in pediatric intensive care who require long-term ventilation (LTV). We used a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to underpin the collection and analysis of data. Unstructured interviews of 40 physicians in four countries took place during 2020. We found that elements of trust, communication and acceptance informed the physicians' perceptions of the relationship with bioethics. These ranged from satisfaction to disappointment with their input into critical decisions. Bioethics services have potential to help physicians gain clarity over distressing and complex care decisions, yet physicians perceive the service inconsistently as a means of support. This research provides a sound basis to guide more beneficial interactions between clinicians and bioethics services.

Shared decision making for children with chronic respiratory failure-It takes a village and a process

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Shared decision making (SDM) before nonurgent tracheostomy in a child with chronic respiratory failure (CRF) is often recommended, but has proven challenging to implement in practice. We hypothesize that utilization of the microsystem model for analysis of the complex ecosystem in which SDM occurs will yield insights that enable formation of a reproducible, measurable SDM process.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of a case series of children with CRF in whom a SDM process was pursued. The process included a palliative care consult, a validated decision aid and 12 key questions designed to elucidate information integral to an informed decision. Investigators reviewed a single hospital admission for each child, focusing on the 3 core elements of a medical microsystem-the patient, the providers, and information.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients who met inclusion criteria ranged in age from 0 to 19.5 years (median 1.7) and remained in the hospital from 10 to 316 days (median 38). Patients were medically complex with multiple and varied respiratory diagnoses, multiple and varied comorbidities, and varying psychosocial environments. 14/29 children received tracheostomies. Each child encountered a mean of 6.2 medical specialties, 1.9 surgical specialties and 8.5 nonphysician led services. Answers to 12 key questions were not documented systematically and often not found in the electronic medical record.

CONCLUSION

A unique SDM microsystem is formed around each child but not optimally utilized. Explicit recognition of these microsystems would enable team formation and an SDM process comprised of measurable steps and communication patterns.

Critical Care Nurses' Qualitative Reports of Experiences With Physician Behaviors, Nursing Issues, and Other Obstacles in End-of-Life Care

BACKGROUND

Critical care nurses (CCNs) frequently provide end of life (EOL) care in intensive care units (ICUs). Obstacles to EOL care in ICUs exist and have been previously published along with reports from CCNs. Further data exploring obstacles faced during ICU EOL care may increase awareness of common EOL obstacles. Research focusing on obstacles related to physician behaviors and nursing issues (and others) may provide improvement of care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to gather first-hand data from CCNs regarding obstacles related to EOL care.

METHODS

A random, geographically dispersed sample of 2000 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was surveyed. Responses from an item asking CCNs to tell us of the obstacles they experience providing EOL care to dying patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 104 participants who provided 146 responses to this item reflecting EOL obstacles. These obstacles were divided into 11 themes; 6 physician-related obstacles and 5 nursing- and other related obstacles. Major EOL ICU barrier themes were inadequate physician communication, physicians giving false hope, poor nurse staffing, and inadequate EOL care education for nurses.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Poor physician communication was the main obstacle noted by CCNs during ICU EOL care, followed by physicians giving false hope. Heavy patient workloads with inadequate staffing were also a major barrier in CCNs providing EOL care.

Withholding and withdrawing treatment in pediatric intensive care. Update of the GFRUP recommendations

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric critical care. Since then, the French Public Health Code, modified by the laws passed in 2005 and 2016 and by their enactment decrees, has established a legal framework for practice. Now, 15 years later, an update of these recommendations was needed to factor in the experience acquired by healthcare teams, new questions raised by practice surveys, the recommendations issued in the interval, the changes in legislation, and a few legal precedents. The objective of this article is to help pediatric critical care teams find the closest possible compromise between the ethical principles guiding the care offered to the child and the family and compliance with current regulations and laws.

Does participation in ethics discussions have an impact on ethics decision-making? A cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology

PURPOSE

The overall aim of this study was to describe perceptions of the decision-making process in relation to participation/non-participation in ethics discussions among healthcare professionals in paediatric oncology.

METHODS

Healthcare professionals, working at three paediatric units where ethics discussions where performed answered a study-specific questionnaire focusing on perceptions of involvement, influence, responsibility and understanding of ethics decision-making. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, non-parametric paired t-tests and correlation tests.

RESULTS

Participation in ethics discussions was related to perceptions of greater involvement and the possibility of influencing decisions, as well as formal/shared responsibility for the ethics decisions related to patient care. Medical doctors and registered nurses perception of involvement in decisions, possibility to influence and responsibility decreased when they were not present during the ethics discussion or when no ethics discussion was conducted at all. Healthcare professionals had a generally good understanding of the ethical issues and the ethics decisions. The whole group considered medical doctors to be the most important participants in the ethics discussions, followed by patients/family. Healthcare professionals wanted more teamwork and viewed ethics discussions as very helpful for teamwork when dealing with ethical issues in paediatric oncology.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethics discussions in paediatric oncology practice increases the involvement within and the understanding of the decision-making process about ethical decisions. The understanding is not always dependent on participation, indicating a great trust in team members. Based on these findings the implementation of a structure for ethics support in paediatric oncology where patients/families are integrated is recommended.

Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness, Prolonged ICU Admissions, and Clinician Distress

To gain an in-depth understanding of the experience of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinicians caring for children with chronic critical illness (CCI), we conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed in-person interviews with PICU clinicians. We used purposive sampling to identify five PICU patients who died following long admissions, whose care generated substantial staff distress. We recruited four to six interdisciplinary clinicians per patient who had frequent clinical interactions with the patient/family for interviews. Conventional content analysis was applied to the transcripts resulting in the emergence of five themes: nonbeneficial treatment; who is driving care? Elusive goals of care, compromised personhood, and suffering. Interventions directed at increasing consensus, clarifying goals of care, developing systems allowing children with CCI to be cared for outside of the ICU, and improving communication may help to ameliorate this distress.

Interdisciplinary care of children with trisomy 13 and 18

Children with trisomy 13 and 18 (previously deemed "incompatible with life") are living longer, warranting a comprehensive overview of their unique comorbidities and complex care needs. This Review Article provides a summation of the recent literature, informed by the study team's Interdisciplinary Trisomy Translational Program consisting of representatives from: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, neonatology, otolaryngology, intensive care, neurology, social work, chaplaincy, nursing, and palliative care. Medical interventions are discussed in the context of decisional-paradigms and whole-family considerations. The communication format, educational endeavors, and lessons learned from the study team's interdisciplinary care processes are shared with recognition of the potential for replication and implementation in other care settings.

Ethical considerations for cardiac surgical interventions in children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18

Medical and surgical approaches to children with trisomy 13 and 18 are evolving, and an increasing number of patients are being considered for simple and complex cardiac procedures. This review describes how the shifts in medical and social considerations for children with trisomy 13 and 18 mirror the shifts that occurred 50 years ago for children with trisomy 21. Yet the variability in cardiac lesions, and variability in non-cardiac comorbidities, is much greater for patients with trisomy 13 and 18 than for those with trisomy 21. That variability, combined with the severe neurologic impairment in survivors, complicates the current risk: benefit balance of surgical intervention. Consistent approaches to care for these patients should be built on an evidence base, and should include contributions from specialists in medical ethics and palliative care.

Factors Impacting Physician Recommendation for Tracheostomy Placement in Pediatric Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Stated Practice

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the stated practices of qualified Canadian physicians toward tracheostomy for pediatric prolonged mechanical ventilation and whether subspecialty and comorbid conditions impact attitudes toward tracheostomy.

DESIGN

Cross sectional web-based survey.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric intensivists, neonatologists, respirologists, and otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons practicing at 16 tertiary academic Canadian pediatric hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

Respondents answered a survey based on three cases (Case 1: neonate with bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Cases 2 and 3: children 1 and 10 years old with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, respectively) including a series of alterations in relevant clinical variables.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared respondents' likelihood of recommending tracheostomy at 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation and evaluated the effects of various clinical changes on physician willingness to recommend tracheostomy and their impact on preferred timing (≤ 3 wk or > 3 wk of mechanical ventilation). Response rate was 165 of 396 (42%). Of those respondents who indicated they had the expertise, 47 of 121 (38.8%), 23 of 93 (24.7%), and 40 of 87 (46.0%) would recommend tracheostomy at less than or equal to 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation for cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p < 0.05 Case 2 vs 3). Upper airway obstruction was associated with increased willingness to recommend earlier tracheostomy. Life-limiting condition, severe neurologic injury, unrepaired congenital heart disease, multiple organ system failure, and noninvasive ventilation were associated with a decreased willingness to recommend tracheostomy.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides insight in to the stated practice patterns of Canadian physicians who care for children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Physicians remain reluctant to recommend tracheostomy for children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation due to lung disease alone at 3 weeks of mechanical ventilation. Prospective studies characterizing actual physician practice toward tracheostomy for pediatric prolonged mechanical ventilation and evaluating the impact of tracheostomy timing on clinically important outcomes are needed as the next step toward harmonizing care delivery for such patients.

"Stuck in the ICU": Caring for Children With Chronic Critical Illness

OBJECTIVE

Neonatal ICUs and PICUs increasingly admit patients with chronic critical illness: children whose medical complexity leads to recurrent and prolonged ICU hospitalizations. We interviewed participants who routinely care for children with chronic critical illness to describe their experiences with ICU care for pediatric chronic critical illness.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes.

SETTING

Stakeholders came from five regions (Seattle, WA; Houston, TX; Jackson, MS; Baltimore, MD; and Philadelphia, PA).

SUBJECTS

Fifty-one stakeholders including: 1) interdisciplinary providers (inpatient, outpatient, home care, foster care) with extensive chronic critical illness experience; or 2) parents of children with chronic critical illness.

INTERVENTIONS

Telephone or in-person interviews.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Stakeholders identified several key issues and several themes emerged after qualitative analysis. Issues around chronic critical illness patient factors noted that patients are often relocated to the ICU because of their medical needs. During extended ICU stays, these children require longitudinal relationships and developmental stimulation that outstrip ICU capabilities. Family factors can affect care as prolonged ICU experience leads some to disengage from decision-making. Clinician factors noted that parents of children with chronic critical illness are often experts about their child's disease, shifting the typical ICU clinician-parent relationship. Comprehensive care for children with chronic critical illness can become secondary to needs of acutely ill patients. Lastly, with regard to system factors, stakeholders agreed that achieving consistent ICU care goals is difficult for chronic critical illness patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU care is poorly adapted to pediatric chronic critical illness. Patient, family, clinician, and system factors highlight opportunities for targeted interventions toward improvement in care.