1
|
Berger M, Baliker M, Van Gelder T, Böhmig GA, Mannon RB, Kumar D, Chadban S, Nickerson P, Lee LA, Djamali A. Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection: Opportunity to Determine the Role of Interleukin-6 Blockade. Transplantation 2024; 108:1109-1114. [PMID: 37941113 PMCID: PMC11042519 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (caAMR) is arguably the most important cause of late kidney allograft failure. However, there are no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for acute or chronic AMR and there is no consensus on effective treatment. Many trials in transplantation have failed because of slow and/or inadequate enrollment, and no new agent has been approved by the FDA for transplantation in over a decade. Several lines of evidence suggest that interleukin-6 is an important driver of AMR, and clazakizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-6, has shown promising results in phase 2 studies. The IMAGINE trial (Interleukin-6 Blockade Modifying Antibody-mediated Graft Injury and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline) (NCT03744910) is the first to be considered by the FDA using a reasonably likely surrogate endpoint (slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline >1 y) for accelerated approval and is the only ongoing clinical trial for the treatment of chronic rejection. This trial offers us the opportunity to advance the care for our patients in need, and this article is a call to action for all transplant providers caring for patients with caAMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mel Berger
- Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Teun Van Gelder
- Department Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Deepali Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Transplant Infectious Disease, Ajmera Transplant Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steve Chadban
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Laurie A. Lee
- Research and Development, Transplant Therapeutic Area, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, PA
| | - Arjang Djamali
- Department of Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee LA, Martin DA, Mahoney M, James L, Avitzur Y, Carroll A, Piggott B, Tomlinson C, Urschel S, Hamiwka L. Organ Donation in Canadian PICUs: A Cross-Sectional Survey, 2021-2022. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25:416-424. [PMID: 37966310 PMCID: PMC11060061 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand contemporary pediatric organ donation programs in Canadian PICUs, including: policies and practices, data collection and reporting, and system and process barriers. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey carried out 2021-2022. SETTING Canadian PICUs affiliated with a donor physician network. SUBJECTS Pediatric intensivists identified as the donation program lead, or most knowledgeable about donation for their institution. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A 19-item survey was developed through collaboration with stakeholders from the organ donation and transplantation community within Canada. Domains and items were generated and reduced iteratively during an in-person workshop. Pretesting and pilot testing were completed to ensure readability, flow, clinical sensibility, and construct validity. Fifteen of 16 (94%) invited Canadian PICUs from seven provinces completed the survey representing 88% (15/18) of all noncardiac Canadian PICUs. Surveys were completed between June 2021 and September 2022. All units support donation after death by neurologic criteria (DNC); 14 of 15 indicated donation policies were in place and 1 of 15 indicated no policy but the ability to facilitate donation. Thirteen of 15 units (87%) support donation after death by circulatory criteria (DCC) with policies in place, with 11 of 13 of these indicating routine support of donation opportunities. The majority (13/15) of units identified a donation champion. Of the 16 identified champions across these centers, 13 were physicians and were registered nurses or nurse practitioners. Eight of 13 units (62%) with donation champions had positions supported financially, of which 5 units came from the Organ Donation Organization and the other 3 came from the provincial health authority. Finally, only 3 of 15 PICU donation programs have a pediatric donation committee with family involvement. Variability exists in identification (including determination of death practices), referral, and approach for donation between units. CONCLUSIONS Although all Canadian PICUs support donation after DNC donation, and most support donation after DCC, variability exists in the identification, referral, and approach of potential donors. There is a notable lack of family involvement in pediatric donation programs. There are many opportunities for standardization of PICU donation programs which may result in improved rates of pediatric organ donation in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SickKids Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Dori-Ann Martin
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Meagan Mahoney
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lee James
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Yaron Avitzur
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SickKids Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allison Carroll
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Christopher Tomlinson
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simon Urschel
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lorraine Hamiwka
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Francoeur C, Silva A, Hornby L, Wollny K, Lee LA, Pomeroy A, Cayouette F, Scales N, Weiss MJ, Dhanani S. Pediatric Death After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies: A Scoping Review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25:e12-e19. [PMID: 37678383 PMCID: PMC10756696 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate literature on the dying process in children after withdrawal of life sustaining measures (WLSM) in the PICU. We focused on the physiology of dying, prediction of time to death, impact of time to death, and uncertainty of the dying process on families, healthcare workers, and organ donation. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION We included studies that discussed the dying process after WLSM in the PICU, with no date or study type restrictions. We excluded studies focused exclusively on adult or neonatal populations, children outside the PICU, or on organ donation or adult/pediatric studies where pediatric data could not be isolated. DATA EXTRACTION Inductive qualitative content analysis was performed. DATA SYNTHESIS Six thousand two hundred twenty-five studies were screened and 24 included. Results were grouped into four categories: dying process, perspectives of healthcare professionals and family, WLSM and organ donation, and recommendations for future research. Few tools exist to predict time to death after WLSM in children. Most deaths after WLSM occur within 1 hour and during this process, healthcare providers must offer support to families regarding logistics, medications, and expectations. Providers describe the unpredictability of the dying process as emotionally challenging and stressful for family members and staff; however, no reports of families discussing the impact of time to death prediction were found. The unpredictability of death after WLSM makes families less likely to pursue donation. Future research priorities include developing death prediction tools of tools, provider and parental decision-making, and interventions to improve end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS The dying process in children is poorly understood and understudied. This knowledge gap leaves families in a vulnerable position and the clinical team without the necessary tools to support patients, families, or themselves. Improving time to death prediction after WLSM may improve care provision and enable identification of potential organ donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conall Francoeur
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amina Silva
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Hornby
- Consultant, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Krista Wollny
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Laurie A Lee
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Consultant, Canadian Blood Services, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU de Quebec - University of Laval, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Dynamical Analysis Lab, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Florence Cayouette
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU de Quebec - University of Laval, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nathan Scales
- Dynamical Analysis Lab, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU de Quebec - University of Laval, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sonny Dhanani
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee LA, Foster JR, Nikitovic D, Garros D, Ryan MJ, Moghadam N, Slumkoski C, Walls M, Curran JA, Seabrook JA, Burgess S, Betts L, Barclay A, Choong K, Fontela P, Murthy S, Nicoll J, O'Hearn K, Sehgal A, Tijssen J. "We Aren't Meant to Go Through the Hardest Parts of Our Lives Alone": Family Experience With Restricted PICU Presence During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Crit Care Explor 2023; 5:e0989. [PMID: 38304703 PMCID: PMC10833634 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT PICUs across Canada restricted family presence (RFP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic from allowing two or more family members to often only one family member at the bedside. The objective of this study was to describe the experiences and impact of RFP on families of critically ill children to inform future policy and practice. HYPOTHESIS RFP policies negatively impacted families of PICU patients and caused moral distress. METHODS AND MODELS National, cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey. Family members of children admitted to a Canadian PICU between March 2020 and February 2021 were invited to complete the survey. RFP-attributable distress was measured with a modified distress thermometer (0-10). Closed-ended questions were reported with descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression assessed factors associated with RFP-attributable distress. Open-ended questions were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS Of 250 respondents who experienced RFP, 124 (49.6%) were restricted to one family member at the bedside. The median amount of distress that families attributed to RFP policies was 6 (range: 0-10). Families described isolation, removal of supports, and perception of trauma related to RFP. Most families (183, 73.2%) felt that policies were enforced in a way that made them feel valued by PICU clinicians, which was associated with less RFP-attributable distress. Differential impact was seen where families with lower household income indicated higher RFP-attributable distress score (2.35; 95% CI, 0.53-4.17; p = 0.03). Most respondents suggested that future policies should allow at least two family members at the bedside. INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Families of children admitted to PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic described increased distress, trauma, and removal of supports due to RFP policies. Vulnerable families showed an increased odds of higher distress. Healthcare professionals played an important role in mitigating distress. Allowance of at least two family members at the bedside should be considered for future policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer R Foster
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Dejana Nikitovic
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Garros
- Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Molly J Ryan
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Neda Moghadam
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Corey Slumkoski
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Martha Walls
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Janet A Curran
- IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Dalhousie School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jamie A Seabrook
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, London, BC, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Betts
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Amanda Barclay
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Pediatrics, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Island Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Victoria General Hospital, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Karen Choong
- Departments of Pediatrics and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Fontela
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Srinivas Murthy
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jessica Nicoll
- Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Katie O'Hearn
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Anupam Sehgal
- Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Janice Tijssen
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foster JR, Lee LA, Seabrook JA, Ryan M, Slumkoski C, Walls M, Betts LJ, Burgess SA, Moghadam N, Garros D. A survey of pediatric intensive care unit clinician experience with restricted family presence during COVID-19. Can J Anaesth 2023; 70:1669-1681. [PMID: 37610552 PMCID: PMC10600297 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02547-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Limiting family presence runs counter to the family-centred values of Canadian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). This study explores how implementing and enforcing COVID-19-related restricted family presence (RFP) policies impacted PICU clinicians nationally. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey of Canadian PICU clinicians to assess experience and opinions of restrictions, moral distress (Moral Distress Thermometer, range 0-10), and mental health impacts (Impact of Event Scale [IES], range 0-75 and attributable stress [five-point Likert scale]). For analysis, we used descriptive statistics, multivariate regression modelling, and a general inductive approach for free text. RESULTS Representing 17/19 Canadian PICUs, 368 of 388 respondents (94%) experienced RFP policies and were predominantly female (333/368, 91%), English speaking (338/368, 92%), and nurses (240/368, 65%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) reported moral distress score was 4.5 (2.4) and was associated with perceived differential impact on families. The mean (SD) total IES score was 29.7 (10.5), suggesting moderate traumatic stress with 56% (176/317) reporting increased/significantly increased stress from restrictions related to separating families, denying access, and concern for family impacts. Incongruence between RFP policies/practices and PICU values was perceived by 66% of respondents (217/330). Most respondents (235/330, 71%) felt their opinions were not valued when implementing policies. Though respondents perceived that restrictions were implemented for the benefit of clinicians (252/332, 76%) and to protect families (236/315, 75%), 57% (188/332) disagreed that their RFP experience was mainly positive. CONCLUSION Pediatric intensive care unit-based RFP rules, largely designed and implemented without bedside clinician input, caused increased psychological burden for clinicians, characterized as moderate moral distress and trauma triggered by perceived impacts on families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Foster
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Ave., PO Box 9700, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
- Department of Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
- Children's Health Research Institute and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Laurie A Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Critical Care, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jamie A Seabrook
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Human Environments Analysis Laboratory, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Molly Ryan
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Corey Slumkoski
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Martha Walls
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Laura J Betts
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Stacy A Burgess
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Children's Health Program, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Neda Moghadam
- Patient Partner, Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Daniel Garros
- Stollery Children's Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berman DM, Lee AY, Lesurf R, Patel PG, Ebrahimizadeh W, Bayani J, Lee LA, Boufaied N, Selvarajah S, Jamaspishvili T, Guérard KP, Dion D, Kawashima A, Clarke GM, How N, Jackson CL, Scarlata E, Siddiqui K, Okello JBA, Aprikian AG, Moussa M, Finelli A, Chin J, Brimo F, Bauman G, Loblaw A, Venkateswaran V, Buttyan R, Chevalier S, Thomson A, Park PC, Siemens DR, Lapointe J, Boutros PC, Bartlett JMS. Multimodal Biomarkers That Predict the Presence of Gleason Pattern 4: Potential Impact for Active Surveillance. J Urol 2023; 210:257-271. [PMID: 37126232 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Latent grade group ≥2 prostate cancer can impact the performance of active surveillance protocols. To date, molecular biomarkers for active surveillance have relied solely on RNA or protein. We trained and independently validated multimodal (mRNA abundance, DNA methylation, and/or DNA copy number) biomarkers that more accurately separate grade group 1 from grade group ≥2 cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were assigned to training (n=333) and validation (n=202) cohorts. We profiled the abundance of 342 mRNAs, 100 DNA copy number alteration loci, and 14 hypermethylation sites at 2 locations per tumor. Using the training cohort with cross-validation, we evaluated methods for training classifiers of pathological grade group ≥2 in centrally reviewed radical prostatectomies. We trained 2 distinct classifiers, PRONTO-e and PRONTO-m, and validated them in an independent radical prostatectomy cohort. RESULTS PRONTO-e comprises 353 mRNA and copy number alteration features. PRONTO-m includes 94 clinical, mRNAs, copy number alterations, and methylation features at 14 and 12 loci, respectively. In independent validation, PRONTO-e and PRONTO-m predicted grade group ≥2 with respective true-positive rates of 0.81 and 0.76, and false-positive rates of 0.43 and 0.26. Both classifiers were resistant to sampling error and identified more upgrading cases than a well-validated presurgical risk calculator, CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Two grade group classifiers with superior accuracy were developed by incorporating RNA and DNA features and validated in an independent cohort. Upon further validation in biopsy samples, classifiers with these performance characteristics could refine selection of men for active surveillance, extending their treatment-free survival and intervals between surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Berman
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Y Lee
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Lesurf
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Now with Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - P G Patel
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Now with Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Ebrahimizadeh
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Now with IMV Inc, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - J Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - L A Lee
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - N Boufaied
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - S Selvarajah
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Now with University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T Jamaspishvili
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - K-P Guérard
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - D Dion
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Kawashima
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Now with Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - G M Clarke
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - N How
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - C L Jackson
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - E Scarlata
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - K Siddiqui
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Now with Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Seeb, Oman
| | - J B A Okello
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - A G Aprikian
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - M Moussa
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Finelli
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Chin
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - F Brimo
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - G Bauman
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - V Venkateswaran
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Buttyan
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Departments of Experimental Medicine and Interdisciplinary Oncology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - S Chevalier
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - A Thomson
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Now with College of Science and Engineering Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - P C Park
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Now with Department of Pathology, Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - D R Siemens
- Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Urology, Oncology and Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Lapointe
- Department of Surgery, McGill University and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - P C Boutros
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Now with University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - J M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shemie SD, Wilson LC, Hornby L, Basmaji J, Baker AJ, Bensimon CM, Chandler JA, Chassé M, Dawson R, Dhanani S, Mooney OT, Sarti AJ, Simpson C, Teitelbaum J, Torrance S, Boyd JG, Brennan J, Brewster H, Carignan R, Dawe KJ, Doig CJ, Elliott-Pohl K, Gofton TE, Hartwick M, Healey A, Honarmand K, Hornby K, Isac G, Kanji A, Kawchuk J, Klowak JA, Kramer AH, Kromm J, LeBlanc AE, Lee-Ameduri K, Lee LA, Leeies M, Lewis A, Manara A, Matheson S, McKinnon NKA, Murphy N, Briard JN, Pope TM, Sekhon MS, Shanker JJS, Singh G, Singh J, Slessarev M, Soliman K, Sutherland S, Weiss MJ, Shaul RZ, Zuckier LS, Zorko DJ, Rochwerg B. A brain-based definition of death and criteria for its determination after arrest of circulation or neurologic function in Canada: a 2023 clinical practice guideline. Can J Anaesth 2023; 70:483-557. [PMID: 37131020 PMCID: PMC10203028 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02431-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This 2023 Clinical Practice Guideline provides the biomedical definition of death based on permanent cessation of brain function that applies to all persons, as well as recommendations for death determination by circulatory criteria for potential organ donors and death determination by neurologic criteria for all mechanically ventilated patients regardless of organ donation potential. This Guideline is endorsed by the Canadian Critical Care Society, the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (representing the Canadian Neurological Society, Canadian Neurosurgical Society, Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists, Canadian Association of Child Neurology, Canadian Society of Neuroradiology, and Canadian Stroke Consortium), Canadian Blood Services, the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Nurse Practitioners Association of Canada, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam D Shemie
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- MUHC Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Andrew J Baker
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Sonny Dhanani
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Owen T Mooney
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Gift of Life Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Aimee J Sarti
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christy Simpson
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jeanne Teitelbaum
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - J Gordon Boyd
- Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kirk J Dawe
- Eastern Health, St. John's, NL, Canada
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Christopher J Doig
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Hartwick
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Healey
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada
| | - Kimia Honarmand
- Western University, London, ON, Canada
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - George Isac
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aly Kanji
- McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Joann Kawchuk
- Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | - Andreas H Kramer
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Southern Alberta Organ & Tissue Donation Program, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Julie Kromm
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Allana E LeBlanc
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, London, ON, Canada
| | - Katarina Lee-Ameduri
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Laurie A Lee
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Murdoch Leeies
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba Gift of Life Program, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Canadian Critical Care Society, Markham, ON, Canada
| | - Ariane Lewis
- NYU Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Nicole K A McKinnon
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Peter Gilgan Center for Research and Learning, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Thaddeus M Pope
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
- Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
- University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mypinder S Sekhon
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Gurmeet Singh
- Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Singh
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marat Slessarev
- Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karim Soliman
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Ontario Health (Trillium Gift of Life Network), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Matthew J Weiss
- Transplant Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
- CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Randi Zlotnik Shaul
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lionel S Zuckier
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David J Zorko
- St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Canadian Critical Care Society, Markham, ON, Canada
- Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Markham, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moradi J, Mikhail M, Lee LA, Traube C, Sarti AJ, Choong K. Lived Experiences of Delirium in Critically Ill Children: A Qualitative Study. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this study was to understand the lived experiences of delirium in critically ill children. We conducted phenomenological qualitative interviews with critically ill pediatric survivors aged 0 to 18 years who had experienced delirium, along with their family caregivers and health care providers, from pediatric intensive care units in two tertiary care children's hospitals in Canada. Cases were identified if they had a Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) score of ≥ 9 for at least 48 hours. Thirteen interviews were conducted, representing 10 index patients with delirium (age range: 7 weeks to 17 years). Participants shared experiences that were divided into themes of delirium symptoms, the impact of delirium, and their experience with the care of delirium. Within each theme, subthemes were identified. Symptoms of delirium included hallucinations, fluctuating symptoms, and lack of eye contact. Children were often described as “not himself/herself.” Delirium had long-lasting impact on patients; memories remained prominent even after the hospital stay. Family members and health care providers often felt helpless and ill-prepared to manage delirium. The delirium experience had significant impact on loved ones, causing persistent and vicarious suffering after the critical illness course. Family members and health care providers prioritized nonpharmacological strategies, family presence, and education as key strategies for delirium management. The lived experience of delirium in both infants and older children is physically, psychologically, and emotionally distressing. Given the traumatic long-term consequences, there is an urgent need to target delirium education, management, and prevention to improve long-term outcomes in PICU survivors and their families.
Trial Registration number: NCT04168515.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Moradi
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mirriam Mikhail
- Department of Pediatrics, Toronto Sick Children's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laurie A. Lee
- Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Pediatric Critical Care, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Chani Traube
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
| | - Aimee J. Sarti
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Choong
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Foster JR, Lee LA, Seabrook JA, Ryan M, Betts LJ, Burgess SA, Slumkoski C, Walls M, Garros D. Family presence in Canadian PICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods environmental scan of policy and practice. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E622-E632. [PMID: 35790228 PMCID: PMC9262350 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their broad commitment to family-centred care, children's hospitals and associated pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) restricted family presence during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to describe family presence policies and practices in Canadian PICUs from March to May 2020, and their evolution by August to December 2020. METHODS We conducted an environmental scan of family presence policies and restrictions in all 19 Canadian PICUs using 2 methods. We conducted a literature review of public-facing visitation policy documents in June 2020 using a standardized data extraction form. We also administered a cross-sectional survey of PICU leadership (managers and physician chiefs) between August and December 2020 by telephone or videoconferencing. We used inductive content analysis to code qualitative data, generating summative count data. We analyzed quantitative data descriptively. RESULTS As part of the literature search, we collected 2 (12%) PICU-specific, 14 (82%) pediatric-specific and 1 (6%) hospital-wide visitation policy documents from the early pandemic. One policy document provided guidance on all of the policy elements sought; the number of enabled caregivers was not included in the documents for 7 of 19 units (37%). All 19 Canadian PICUs were represented among the 24 survey respondents (15 physician chiefs and 9 operations or clinical managers). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, all units allowed the presence of 2 or more family members. Early in the pandemic, reported practices limited the number of adult caregivers for patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection to 1 (n = 21/24, 88%) or 2 (n = 3/24, 12%); all units prohibited siblings. Some centres restricted caregivers from switching bedside presence with one another (patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 16/23, 70%; patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 20/23, 87%); leaving their child's PICU room (patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 1/24, 4%; patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 16/24, 67%); and joining in-person rounds (patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 9/22, 41%; patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection: n = 17/22, 77%). All respondents endorsed policy exceptions during end-of-life care. Some reported policies and practices were adapted over the study period. INTERPRETATION Early COVID-19-related family presence policies in Canadian PICUs varied among centres. Although some centres adapted policies and practices, this study revealed ongoing potential threats to family centred care at the mid-pandemic stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Ruth Foster
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
| | - Laurie A Lee
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Jamie A Seabrook
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Molly Ryan
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Laura J Betts
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Stacy A Burgess
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Corey Slumkoski
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Martha Walls
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| | - Daniel Garros
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Foster, Ryan, Betts, Burgess), Children's Health Program (Burgess), and patient partners, Department of Pediatric Critical Care (Slumkoski, Walls), IWK Health, Halifax, NS; Department of Critical Care (Foster), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Faculty of Nursing (Lee), and Department of Pediatrics (Lee), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; School of Food and Nutritional Sciences (Seabrook), Brescia University College, and Children's Health Research Institute (Seabrook), London, Ont.; Stollery Children's Hospital (Garros), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; Division of Critical Care (Garros), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fakhory N, Lee LA, Seabrook JA, Ryan M, Miller L, Foster JR. Outcomes associated with family presence at the bedside of critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:2040-2047. [DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
11
|
Nakamura Y, Hozawa S, Sagara H, Ohbayashi H, Lee LA, Crawford J, Tamaoki J, Nishi T, Fowler A. Efficacy and safety of once-daily, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled asthma: the CAPTAIN study. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1657-1665. [PMID: 34162298 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1944849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In CAPTAIN, a double-blind, parallel-group, Phase IIIA study, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) improved lung function, symptoms and asthma control versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Here, we report efficacy and safety from a Japanese cohort in CAPTAIN. METHODS Adults with inadequately controlled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) were randomized (1:1:1:1:1:1) to once-daily FF/VI (100/25 mcg or 200/25 mcg) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31.25/25 mcg, 100/62.5/25 mcg, 200/31.25/25 mcg, or 200/62.5/25 mcg) for ≥24 weeks. Endpoints included change from baseline in clinic trough FEV1 (primary), annualized rate of moderate/severe asthma exacerbations (key secondary), clinic FEV1 3 h post-dose, and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (all Week 24), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS): Asthma total scores (Weeks 21-24) (all secondary). Adverse events and adverse events of special interest were monitored. Clinical trials.gov registry no: NCT02924688. RESULTS Overall, 229 of 2436 patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were from Japan. In this cohort, change from baseline in trough FEV1 for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg versus FF/VI 100/25 mcg was 105 mL (95% confidence interval -5, 216) and 69 mL (-42, 179) for 200/62.5/25 mcg versus 200/25 mcg. These observations were supported by clinic FEV1 at 3 h post-dose. Moderate/severe exacerbation incidence was low and similar across pooled treatment groups (FF/VI, FF/UMEC 31.25 mcg/VI, FF/UMEC 62.5 mcg/VI). All pooled groups demonstrated clinically important improvements from baseline in ACQ-7, SGRQ and E-RS: Asthma total scores. Safety profiles were consistent with the overall ITT population, with no new safety concerns. CONCLUSION FF/UMEC/VI is an effective option with a favorable risk-benefit profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled moderate or severe asthma on ICS/LABA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Nakamura
- Medical Center for Allergic and Immune Diseases, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee LA, Moss SJ, Martin DA, Rosgen BK, Wollny K, Gilfoyle E, Fiest KM. Comfort-holding in critically ill children: a scoping review. Can J Anaesth 2021; 68:1695-1704. [PMID: 34405358 PMCID: PMC8370455 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-02090-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To understand and summarize the breadth of knowledge on comfort-holding in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Sources This scoping review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. Search strategies were developed with a medical librarian and revised through a peer review of electronic search strategies. All databases were searched from inception to 14 April 2020. Only full-text articles available in English were included. All identified articles were reviewed independently and in duplicate using predetermined criteria. All study designs were eligible if they reported on comfort-holding in a PICU. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Principal findings Of 13,326 studies identified, 13 were included. Comfort-holding was studied in the context of end-of-life care, developmental care, mobilization, and as a unique intervention. Comfort-holding is common during end-of-life care with 77.8% of children held, but rare during acute management (51% of children < three years, < 5% of children ≥ three years). Commonly reported outcomes included child outcomes (e.g., physiologic measurements), safety outcomes (e.g., accidental line removal), parent outcomes (e.g., psychological symptoms), and frequency of holding. Conclusion There is a paucity of literature on comfort-holding in PICUs. This scoping review identifies significant gaps in the literature, including assessment of child-based outcomes of comfort-holding or safety assessment of comfort-holding, and highlights core outcomes to consider in future evaluations of this intervention including child-based outcomes, parent-based outcomes, and safety of the intervention. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02090-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Cuming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB, T3B 6A8, Canada.
| | - Stephana J Moss
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dori-Ann Martin
- Department of Pediatrics, Cuming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB, T3B 6A8, Canada
| | - Brianna K Rosgen
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Krista Wollny
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Elaine Gilfoyle
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirsten M Fiest
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hozawa S, Ohbayashi H, Tsuchiya M, Hara Y, Lee LA, Nakayama T, Tamaoki J, Fowler A, Nishi T. Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Japanese Patients with Asthma: A Long-Term (52-Week) Phase III Open-Label Study. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:809-819. [PMID: 34262299 PMCID: PMC8275015 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s305918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The pivotal CAPTAIN study reported a favorable safety profile with once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple combination of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma, some of whom were Japanese. Here, we evaluate the long-term (52 weeks) safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Japanese patients with asthma. Patients and Methods This was a Phase III, 52-week, multicenter, non-comparator, non-randomized, open-label study (NCT03184987) in Japanese adults receiving maintenance therapy with ICS/LABA, with or without LAMA. At enrollment, patients were allocated to either FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25mcg (Group 1) or 200/62.5/25mcg (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 could have their treatment stepped up to 200/62.5/25mcg at Week 24 if their Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 score was >0.75. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included vital signs, electrocardiogram measurements, and clinical laboratory tests (biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis). Efficacy was assessed as "other" endpoints. Results A total of 111 Japanese patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Overall, 77 (69%) patients reported ≥1 AE (Group 1: n=30 [64%]; step-up group: n=7 [78%]; Group 2: n=40 [73%]). SAEs were reported for 1 (2.1%) and 2 (3.6%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All SAEs were considered unrelated to study treatment. One AE and one SAE led to study withdrawal: oropharyngeal discomfort (Group 1); eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Group 2). No new safety concerns were identified throughout the 52-week treatment period. Conclusion In this uncontrolled open-label study, no new safety concerns were observed with long-term (52 weeks) treatment with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI among 111 Japanese patients with asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michiko Tsuchiya
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yu Hara
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang S, Lee LA, Sule N, Fowler A, Peachey G. Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium Bromide, and Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma, Using Data from a Phase IIIA Study (CAPTAIN). Clin Pharmacokinet 2021; 60:887-896. [PMID: 33598874 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-00988-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This analysis aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate (FF), the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC), and the long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) vilanterol (VI), administered as dual (FF/VI) or triple (FF/UMEC/VI) single-inhaler therapy to patients with asthma, and to identify covariates that may influence the PK of each analyte. METHODS Blood samples were obtained from the phase IIIA CAPTAIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02924688), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI in patients with uncontrolled asthma taking ICS/LABA. Samples were collected at trough (defined as ≥ 20 h after the last dose) from all subjects randomized to the six treatment groups (FF/UMEC/VI 100/31.25/25 μg, 100/62.5/25 μg, 200/31.25/25 μg, 200/62.5/25 μg; FF/VI 100/25 μg, 200/25 μg) at week 24 or the early withdrawal visit. In a subset of patients, PK samples were obtained predose at week 12, and at 5-30 min, 45-90 min, and 2-3 h postdose. For each analyte, a population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The maximum likelihood method was utilized to incorporate data below the quantifiable limit (BQL). Final models were used to derive the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum observed concentration at steady-state for each analyte. RESULTS We obtained 4018, 2695, and 4032 samples from 1891, 1258, and 1891 patients, for FF, UMEC, and VI, respectively; 48%, 49%, and 50% of samples were reported as BQL for each analyte, respectively. The PK were adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination for FF, a two-compartment model with intravenous bolus input and first-order elimination for UMEC, and a three-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination for VI. Statistically significant covariates were body weight on apparent inhaled clearance of FF, creatinine clearance on apparent clearance and body weight on apparent inhaled volume of distribution of the central compartment for UMEC, and race (East Asian, Japanese, and South East Asian heritage) on inhaled apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment for VI. However, the overall effects of covariates were marginal and thus do not warrant dose adjustment. Systemic exposures of FF or VI did not differ when administered as a single-inhaler triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual combination (FF/VI), and were similar to those reported for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CONCLUSION Only marginal covariate effects were observed, and thus no dose adjustments are deemed necessary for FF, UMEC, or VI. There was no difference in FF or VI systemic exposure in patients with asthma when administered as either triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual therapy (FF/VI). Together with efficacy findings from the CAPTAIN study, our data support the use of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma currently receiving ICS/LABA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuying Yang
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
| | | | - Neal Sule
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Fowler
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Guy Peachey
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee LA, Pedersen S, Pascoe SJ, Szefler SJ, Lenney W. No dose effect observed with chronic fluticasone propionate on growth velocity in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2021; 32:377-381. [PMID: 32966707 PMCID: PMC7894339 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Respiratory Clinical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Søren Pedersen
- Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebaelt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Steven J Pascoe
- Respiratory Clinical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Stanley J Szefler
- Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado, CO, USA.,University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Warren Lenney
- Respiratory Child Health, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Choong K, Zorko DJ, Awojoodu R, Ducharme-Crevier L, Fontela PS, Lee LA, Guerguerian AM, Garcia Guerra G, Krmpotic K, McKelvie B, Menon K, Murthy S, Sehgal A, Weiss MJ, Kudchadkar SR. Prevalence of Acute Rehabilitation for Kids in the PICU: A Canadian Multicenter Point Prevalence Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22:181-193. [PMID: 33116069 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate mobilization practices, barriers, and mobility-related adverse events in Canadian PICUs. DESIGN National 2-day point prevalence study. SETTING Thirteen PICUs across Canada. PATIENTS Children with a minimum 72-hour PICU length of stay on the allocated study day. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Outcomes of interest were the prevalence and nature of mobilization activities, rehabilitation resources, adverse events, and factors associated with out-of-bed mobility and therapist-provided mobility. Two PICUs (15%) had early mobilization practice guidelines, and one PICU (8%) reported a formal process for engaging families in the mobilization of patients. The prevalence of mobilization was 110 of 137 patient-days (80%). The commonest activity was out-of-bed mobility (87/137; 64% patient-days); there was no active mobilization on 46 patient-days (34%). Therapists provided mobility on 33% of patient-days. Mobility was most commonly facilitated by nurses (74% events) and family (49% events). Family participation was strongly associated with out-of-bed mobility (odds ratio 6.4; p = 0.001). Intubated, mechanically ventilated patients were mobilized out-of-bed on 18 of 50 patient-days (36%). However, the presence of an endotracheal tube, vasoactive infusions, and age greater than or equal to 3 years were independently associated with not being mobilized out-of-bed. Barriers were reported on 58 of 137 patient-days (42%), and adverse events occurred in 22 of 387 mobility events (6%). CONCLUSIONS Mobilization is common and safe, and the majority of children in Canadian PICUs are being mobilized out-of-bed, even when mechanically ventilated. Family engagement in PICU-based rehabilitation is increasing. This study provides encouraging evidence that common barriers can be overcome in order to safely mobilize children in PICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Choong
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - David J Zorko
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ronke Awojoodu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Laurie A Lee
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Guerguerian
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kristina Krmpotic
- Department of Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Brianna McKelvie
- Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kusum Menon
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Srinivas Murthy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anupam Sehgal
- Department of Pediatrics, Kingston Health Science Center, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, Université Laval Faculté de Médecine, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Sapna R Kudchadkar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee LA, Bailes Z, Barnes N, Boulet LP, Edwards D, Fowler A, Hanania NA, Kerstjens HAM, Kerwin E, Nathan R, Oppenheimer J, Papi A, Pascoe S, Brusselle G, Peachey G, Sule N, Tabberer M, Pavord ID. Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial. Lancet Respir Med 2020; 9:69-84. [PMID: 32918892 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30389-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, 30-50% of patients with moderate or severe asthma remain inadequately controlled. We investigated the safety and efficacy of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate plus umeclidinium plus vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) compared with FF/VI. METHODS In this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3A study (Clinical Study in Asthma Patients Receiving Triple Therapy in a Single Inhaler [CAPTAIN]), participants were recruited from 416 hospitals and primary care centres across 15 countries. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with inadequately controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]-6 score of ≥1·5) despite ICS/LABA, a documented health-care contact or a documented temporary change in asthma therapy for treatment of acute asthma symptoms in the year before screening, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 between 30% and less than 85% of predicted normal value, and reversibility (defined as an increase in FEV1 of ≥12% and ≥200 mL in the 20-60 min after four inhalations of albuterol or salbutamol) at screening. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1), via central based randomisation stratified by pre-study ICS dose at study entry, to once-daily FF/VI (100/25 μg or 200/25 μg) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31·25/25 μg, 100/62·5/25 μg, 200/31·25/25 μg, or 200/62·5/25 μg) administered via Ellipta dry powder inhaler (Glaxo Operations UK, Hertfordshire, UK). Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment allocation. Endpoints assessed in the intention-to-treat population were change from baseline in clinic trough FEV1 at week 24 (primary) and annualised moderate and/or severe asthma exacerbation rate (key secondary). Other secondary endpoints were change from baseline in clinic FEV1 at 3 h post-dose, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and ACQ-7 total score, all at week 24. Change from baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Asthma total score at weeks 21-24 was also a secondary endpoint but is not reported here. Exploratory analyses of biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation on treatment response were also done. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924688, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between Dec 16, 2016, and Aug 31, 2018, 5185 patients were screened and 2439 were recruited and randomly assigned to FF/VI (100/25 μg n=407; 200/25 μg n=406) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31·25/25 μg n=405; 100/62·5/25 μg n=406; 200/31·25/25 μg n=404; 200/62·5/25 μg n=408), with three patients randomly assigned in error and not included in analyses. In the intention-to-treat population, 922 (38%) patients were men, the mean age was 53·2 years (SD 13·1) and body-mass index was 29·4 (6·6). Baseline demographics were generally similar across all treatment groups. The least squares mean improvement in FEV1 change from baseline for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62·5/25 μg versus FF/VI 100/25 μg was 110 mL (95% CI 66-153; p<0·0001) and for 200/62·5/25 μg versus 200/25 μg was 92 mL (49-135; p<0·0001). Adding UMEC 31·25 μg to FF/VI produced similar improvements (FF/UMEC/VI 100/31·25/25 μg vs FF/VI 100/25 μg: 96 mL [52-139; p<0·0001]; and 200/31·25/25 μg vs 200/25 μg: 82 mL [39-125; p=0·0002]). These results were supported by the analysis of clinic FEV1 at 3 h post-dose. Non-significant reductions in moderate and/or severe exacerbation rates were observed for FF/UMEC 62·5 μg/VI versus FF/VI (pooled analysis), with rates lower in FF 200 μg-containing versus FF 100 μg-containing treatment groups. All pooled treatment groups demonstrated mean improvements (decreases) in SGRQ total score at week 24 compared with baseline in excess of the minimal clinically important difference of 4 points; however, there were no differences between treatment groups. For mean change from baseline to week 24 in asthma control questionnaire-7 score, improvements (decreases) exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 0·5 points were observed in all pooled treatment groups. Adding UMEC to FF/VI resulted in small, dose-related improvements compared with FF/VI (pooled analysis: FF/UMEC 31·25 μg/VI versus FF/VI, -0·06 (95% CI -0·12 to 0·01; p=0·094) FF/UMEC 62·5 μg/VI versus FF/VI, -0·09 (-0·16 to -0·02, p=0·0084). By contrast with adding UMEC, the effects of higher dose FF on clinic trough FEV1 and annualised moderate and/or severe exacerbation rate were increased in patients with higher baseline blood eosinophil count and exhaled nitric oxide. Occurrence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups (patients with at least one event ranged from 210 [52%] to 258 [63%]), with the most commonly reported adverse events being nasopharyngitis (51 [13%]-63 [15%]), headache (19 [5%]-36 [9%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (13 [3%]-24 [6%]). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar across all groups (range 18 [4%]-25 [6%)). Three deaths occurred, of which one was considered to be related to study drug (pulmonary embolism in a patient in the FF/UMEC/VI 100/31·25/25 μg group). INTERPRETATION In patients with uncontrolled moderate or severe asthma on ICS/LABA, adding UMEC improved lung function but did not lead to a significant reduction in moderate and/or severe exacerbations. For such patients, single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI is an effective treatment option with a favourable risk-benefit profile. Higher dose FF primarily reduced the rate of exacerbations, particularly in patients with raised biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation. Further confirmatory studies into the differentiating effect of type 2 inflammatory biomarkers on treatment outcomes in asthma are required to build on these exploratory findings and further guide clinical practice. FUNDING GSK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zelie Bailes
- GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Neil Barnes
- GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | | | - Dawn Edwards
- GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, and Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Edward Kerwin
- Crisor, Clinical Research Institute, Medford, OR, USA
| | - Robert Nathan
- Asthma & Allergy Associates, PC and Research Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Guy Peachey
- GSK, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Neal Sule
- GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Collegeville, PA, USA
| | | | - Ian D Pavord
- Nuffield Department of Medicine and Oxford Respiratory NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nelsen LM, Lee LA, Wu W, Lin X, Murray L, Pascoe SJ, Leidy NK. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of E-RS:COPD in patients with spirometric asthma-COPD overlap. Respir Res 2019; 20:107. [PMID: 31151458 PMCID: PMC6545030 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1070-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-RS:COPD) is a patient-reported diary that assesses respiratory symptoms in stable COPD. METHODS This post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm trial (GSK ID: 200699; NCT02164539) assessed the structure, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the E-RS, and a separate wheeze item, for use in patients with a primary diagnosis of asthma or COPD, but with spirometric characteristics of both (fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility to salbutamol; a subset of patients referred to as spirometric asthma-COPD overlap [ACO]; N = 338). RESULTS Factor analysis demonstrated that E-RS included Cough and Sputum, Chest Symptoms, and Breathlessness domains, with a Total score suitable for quantifying overall respiratory symptoms (comparative fit index: 0.9), consistent with the structure shown in COPD. The wheeze item did not fit the model. Total and domain scores were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha: 0.7-0.9) and reproducible (intra-class correlations > 0.7). Moderate correlations between RS-Total and RS-Breathlessness scores were observed with St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total and Activity domain scores at baseline (r = 0.43 and r = 0.48, respectively). E-RS scores were sensitive to change when a patient global impression of change and SGRQ change scores were used to define responders, with changes of ≥ - 1.4 in RS-Total score interpreted as clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS E-RS:COPD scores were reliable, valid and responsive in this sample, suggesting the measure may be suitable for evaluating the severity of respiratory symptoms and the effects of treatment in patients with asthma and COPD that exhibit spirometric characteristics of both fixed airflow obstruction and reversibility. Further study of this instrument and wheeze in new samples of patients with ACO is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Nelsen
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
| | - Laurie A Lee
- Research and Development, GSK, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Wei Wu
- Biostatistics, PAREXEL International, Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Xiwu Lin
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA
| | | | - Steven J Pascoe
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GSK, Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Nancy K Leidy
- Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pascoe SJ, Wu W, Collison KA, Nelsen LM, Wurst KE, Lee LA. Use of clinical characteristics to predict spirometric classification of obstructive lung disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018; 13:889-902. [PMID: 29559773 PMCID: PMC5856300 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s153426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is no consensus on how to define patients with symptoms of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A diagnosis of asthma–COPD overlap (ACO) syndrome has been proposed, but its value is debated. This study (GSK Study 201703 [NCT02302417]) investigated the ability of statistical modeling approaches to define distinct disease groups in patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD) using medical history and spirometric data. Methods Patients aged ≥18 years with diagnoses of asthma and/or COPD were categorized into three groups: 1) asthma (nonobstructive; reversible), 2) ACO (obstructive; reversible), and 3) COPD (obstructive; nonreversible). Obstruction was defined as a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity <0.7, and reversibility as a post-albuterol increase in FEV1 ≥200 mL and ≥12%. A primary model (PM), based on patients’ responses to a health care practitioner-administered questionnaire, was developed using multinomial logistic regression modeling. Other multivariate statistical analysis models for identifying asthma and COPD as distinct entities were developed and assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) assessed the degree of overlap between groups. Results The PM predicted spirometric classifications with modest sensitivity. Other analysis models performed with high discrimination (area under the ROC curve: asthma model, 0.94; COPD model, 0.87). PLS-DA identified distinct phenotypic groups corresponding to asthma and COPD. Conclusion Within the OLD spectrum, patients with asthma or COPD can be identified as two distinct groups with a high degree of precision. Patients outside these classifications do not constitute a homogeneous group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J Pascoe
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Wei Wu
- Biostatistics, PAREXEL International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.,Clinical Statistics, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn A Collison
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hasler WL, May KP, Wilson LA, Van Natta M, Parkman HP, Pasricha PJ, Koch KL, Abell TL, McCallum RW, Nguyen LA, Snape WJ, Sarosiek I, Clarke JO, Farrugia G, Calles-Escandon J, Grover M, Tonascia J, Lee LA, Miriel L, Hamilton FA. Relating gastric scintigraphy and symptoms to motility capsule transit and pressure findings in suspected gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018; 30:10.1111/nmo.13196. [PMID: 28872760 PMCID: PMC6004323 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wireless motility capsule (WMC) findings are incompletely defined in suspected gastroparesis. We aimed to characterize regional WMC transit and contractility in relation to scintigraphy, etiology, and symptoms in patients undergoing gastric emptying testing. METHODS A total of 209 patients with gastroparesis symptoms at NIDDK Gastroparesis Consortium centers underwent gastric scintigraphy and WMCs on separate days to measure regional transit and contractility. Validated questionnaires quantified symptoms. KEY RESULTS Solid scintigraphy and liquid scintigraphy were delayed in 68.8% and 34.8% of patients; WMC gastric emptying times (GET) were delayed in 40.3% and showed 52.8% agreement with scintigraphy; 15.5% and 33.5% had delayed small bowel (SBTT) and colon transit (CTT) times. Transit was delayed in ≥2 regions in 23.3%. Rapid transit was rarely observed. Diabetics had slower GET but more rapid SBTT versus idiopathics (P ≤ .02). GET delays related to greater scintigraphic retention, slower SBTT, and fewer gastric contractions (P ≤ .04). Overall gastroparesis symptoms and nausea/vomiting, early satiety/fullness, bloating/distention, and upper abdominal pain subscores showed no relation to WMC transit. Upper and lower abdominal pain scores (P ≤ .03) were greater with increased colon contractions. Constipation correlated with slower CTT and higher colon contractions (P = .03). Diarrhea scores were higher with delayed SBTT and CTT (P ≤ .04). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Wireless motility capsules define gastric emptying delays similar but not identical to scintigraphy that are more severe in diabetics and relate to reduced gastric contractility. Extragastric transit delays occur in >40% with suspected gastroparesis. Gastroparesis symptoms show little association with WMC profiles, although lower symptoms relate to small bowel or colon abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W L Hasler
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - K P May
- Data Coordinating Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L A Wilson
- Data Coordinating Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - M Van Natta
- Data Coordinating Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H P Parkman
- Section of Gastroenterology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - P J Pasricha
- Section of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - K L Koch
- Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - T L Abell
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - R W McCallum
- Section of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - L A Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - W J Snape
- Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - I Sarosiek
- Section of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - J O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - G Farrugia
- Section of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Calles-Escandon
- Endocrinology Section, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M Grover
- Section of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Tonascia
- Data Coordinating Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L A Lee
- Section of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University Data Coordinating Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L Miriel
- Data Coordinating Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - F A Hamilton
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ellis AK, Tsitoura DC, Quint D, Powley W, Lee LA. Safety and pharmacodynamics of intranasal GSK2245035, a TLR7 agonist for allergic rhinitis: A randomized trial. Clin Exp Allergy 2017; 47:1193-1203. [PMID: 28681506 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) stimulation in the airways may reduce responses to aeroallergens by induction of type 1 interferons (IFNs). GSK2245035 is a novel selective TLR7 agonist in pharmaceutical development. OBJECTIVE Assessment of safety, pharmacodynamics and nasal allergic reactivity following repeated weekly intranasal (i.n.) GSK2245035. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (TL7116958) was conducted over two pollen seasons (2013-2014) and follow-up study (204509) conducted 1 year later. Participants with allergic rhinitis (n=42) were randomized to receive eight weekly doses of i.n. GSK2245035 (20 ng [2014 Cohort; n=14] or 80 ng [2013 Cohort; n=14]) or placebo (n=14). Adverse events (AEs) including cytokine release syndrome AEs (CytoRS-AEs) and nasal symptoms were assessed. Nasal and serum IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) were measured after doses 1 and 8, then 1 (follow-up visit [FUV] 1) and 3 (FUV2) weeks after final dose. Nasal allergen challenges (NACs) and allergic biomarker assessment (nasal, serum) were conducted at baseline, FUV1, FUV2 and at a FUV 1 year after final dose (FUV3; 2014 Cohort only). A Bayesian framework enabled probability statements for mean effect sizes. RESULTS GSK2245035 induced CytoRS-AEs (most commonly headache, median duration <1 day) in 93% of participants at 80 ng, while AE incidence at 20 ng was similar to placebo. There was no evidence of nasal inflammation. Dose-related increases in nasal and serum IP-10 were observed 24 hours after doses 1 and 8 (>95% certainty). Both doses showed a trend in reducing total nasal symptom score 15 minutes post-NAC at FUV1 and FUV2, but there was no reduction evident at FUV3. Nasal levels of selected allergic biomarkers demonstrated trends for reductions at FUV1, FUV2 and FUV3. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Weekly i.n. GSK2245035 20 ng was well tolerated and reduced allergic reactivity to nasal challenge for 3 weeks post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Ellis
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - D Quint
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - W Powley
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - L A Lee
- GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pomeroy EJ, Lee LA, Lee RDW, Schirm DK, Temiz NA, Ma J, Gruber TA, Diaz-Flores E, Moriarity BS, Downing JR, Shannon KM, Largaespada DA, Eckfeldt CE. Ras oncogene-independent activation of RALB signaling is a targetable mechanism of escape from NRAS(V12) oncogene addiction in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene 2016; 36:3263-3273. [PMID: 27991934 PMCID: PMC5464975 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Somatic mutations that lead to constitutive activation of NRAS and KRAS proto-oncogenes are among the most common in human cancer and frequently occur in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). An inducible NRAS(V12)-driven AML mouse model has established a critical role for continued NRAS(V12) expression in leukemia maintenance. In this model genetic suppression of NRAS(V12) expression results in rapid leukemia remission, but some mice undergo spontaneous relapse with NRAS(V12)-independent (NRI) AMLs providing an opportunity to identify mechanisms that bypass the requirement for Ras oncogene activity and drive leukemia relapse. We found that relapsed NRI AMLs are devoid of NRAS(V12) expression and signaling through the major oncogenic Ras effector pathways, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase, but express higher levels of an alternate Ras effector, Ralb, and exhibit NRI phosphorylation of the RALB effector TBK1, implicating RALB signaling in AML relapse. Functional studies confirmed that inhibiting CDK5-mediated RALB activation with a clinically relevant experimental drug, dinaciclib, led to potent RALB-dependent antileukemic effects in human AML cell lines, induced apoptosis in patient-derived AML samples in vitro and led to a 2-log reduction in the leukemic burden in patient-derived xenograft mice. Furthermore, dinaciclib potently suppressed the clonogenic potential of relapsed NRI AMLs in vitro and prevented the development of relapsed AML in vivo. Our findings demonstrate that Ras oncogene-independent activation of RALB signaling is a therapeutically targetable mechanism of escape from NRAS oncogene addiction in AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Pomeroy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - L A Lee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - R D W Lee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - D K Schirm
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - N A Temiz
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - J Ma
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - T A Gruber
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.,Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - E Diaz-Flores
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - B S Moriarity
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - J R Downing
- Department of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - K M Shannon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D A Largaespada
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - C E Eckfeldt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stempel DA, Szefler SJ, Pedersen S, Zeiger RS, Yeakey AM, Lee LA, Liu AH, Mitchell H, Kral KM, Raphiou IH, Prillaman BA, Buaron KS, Yun Kirby S, Pascoe SJ. Safety of Adding Salmeterol to Fluticasone Propionate in Children with Asthma. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:840-9. [PMID: 27579634 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1606356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) have been shown to increase the risk of asthma-related death among adults and the risk of asthma-related hospitalization among children. It is unknown whether the concomitant use of inhaled glucocorticoids with LABAs mitigates those risks. This trial prospectively evaluated the safety of the LABA salmeterol, added to fluticasone propionate, in a fixed-dose combination in children. METHODS We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, children 4 to 11 years of age who required daily asthma medications and had a history of asthma exacerbations in the previous year to receive fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol or fluticasone alone for 26 weeks. The primary safety end point was the first serious asthma-related event (death, endotracheal intubation, or hospitalization), as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The statistical design specified that noninferiority would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio for the primary safety end point was less than 2.675. The main efficacy end point was the first severe asthma exacerbation that led to treatment with systemic glucocorticoids, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS Among the 6208 patients, 27 patients in the fluticasone-salmeterol group and 21 in the fluticasone-alone group had a serious asthma-related event (all were hospitalizations); the hazard ratio with fluticasone-salmeterol versus fluticasone alone was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 2.27), which showed the noninferiority of fluticasone-salmeterol (P=0.006). A total of 265 patients (8.5%) in the fluticasone-salmeterol group and 309 (10.0%) in the fluticasone-alone group had a severe asthma exacerbation (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving children with asthma, salmeterol in a fixed-dose combination with fluticasone was associated with the risk of a serious asthma-related event that was similar to the risk with fluticasone alone. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; VESTRI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01462344 .).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Stempel
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Stanley J Szefler
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Søren Pedersen
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Robert S Zeiger
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Anne M Yeakey
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Laurie A Lee
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Andrew H Liu
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Herman Mitchell
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Kenneth M Kral
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Ibrahim H Raphiou
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Barbara A Prillaman
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Kathleen S Buaron
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Suyong Yun Kirby
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| | - Steven J Pascoe
- From Respiratory Clinical Development (D.A.S., A.M.Y., L.A.L., I.H.R., K.S.B., S.Y.K., S.J.P.) and Research and Development, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, Clinical Statistics (K.M.K.), GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, Rho, Chapel Hill (H.M.), and Biostatistics, Parexel International, Durham (B.A.P.) - all in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Pediatric Pulmonary Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (S.J.S., A.H.L.); the Department of Pediatrics, Center Lillebælt, Fredericia and Kolding Hospital, Odense, Denmark (S.P.); and the Department of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Research, San Diego, CA (R.S.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Whitworth P, Beitsch P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul CL, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. Abstract P1-14-05: Three distinct HER2 subtypes identified by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtyping predict treatment-specific response in the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST registry. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-14-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Ideally classification by subtype predicts treatment response and overall outcome. BluePrint 80-gene functional molecular subtype is based on mRNA expression (as is intrinsic subtype) associated with intact translation to protein (unlike intrinsic subtype). BluePrint (BP) classifies patients into Luminal, Her2 or Basal-type. Presently subtype is approximated using conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) ("conventional subtype") or assigned by gene expression profiling. The main objective of the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST study is to compare drug sensitivity as defined by pathological Complete Response (pCR), using 80-gene functional subtype vs. conventional IHC/FISH subtyping. NBRST enrolled over 1,000 US patients between June 2011 and December 2014. In this analysis we present the results for IHC/FISH Her2-positive patients.
Methods
Here we report findings in the 260 NBRST patients who had IHC/FISH Her2+ breast cancer, according to ASCO CAP guidelines at the time of diagnosis. Treatment, including chemotherapy and HER2-targeted agents, was at the discretion of the physician adhering to NCCN approved or other peer-reviewed, established regimens over the course of the study. pCR was defined as T0/isN0. Fisher's exact test was used to compare pCR rates among IHC/FISH and functional subtypes and treatment groups.
Results
The 260 IHC/FISH Her2+ patients had median age 53 (range 23-81) and included T1-4, N0-3 tumors. Of 169 ER+/Her2+ tumors 49% were re-classified as BP Luminal, 43% as BP HER2, and 8% as BP Basal. The median ER% of ER+/Her2+/BP Luminal tumors was 93% (range 3-100), compared to 79% in ER+/Her2+/BP HER2 (range 1-91) and 8% in ER+/Her2+/BP Basal-type (range 2-99).The overall pCR rate in ER+/Her2+/BP Luminal was 17% (4% with chemo/trastuzumab; 39% chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, p<0.0001) and statistically inferior (p<0.0001) to the 59% pCR rate in ER+/Her2+/BP HER2. Of 91 ER-/Her2+ tumors 74% were classified as BP HER2, 25% were re-classified BP Basal and <1% was BP Luminal. NCT pCR rates for ER-/Her2+/BP HER2 was 67% (64% with chemo/trastuzumab; 77% chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab, p=0.40) and significantly superior (p=0.026) to the 39% pCR rate in ER-/Her2+/BP Basal (p=0.026).
Conclusions
In the NBRST study, BP 80-gene functional subtype (based on mRNA expression and translation): 1. Re-classifies over half of all IHC/FISH ER+/Her2+ patients; 2. Predicts treatment response or resistance in Her2+ patients not segregated by conventional IHC/FISH classification and 3. Identifies ER+/Her2+ tumors that are sensitive to chemo/trastuzumab/pertuzumab but resistant to chemo/trastuzumab.
Citation Format: Whitworth P, Beitsch P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul CL, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. Three distinct HER2 subtypes identified by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtyping predict treatment-specific response in the prospective neo-adjuvant NBRST registry. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Whitworth
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - P Beitsch
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - P Baron
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - J Beatty
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - JV Pellicane
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - MK Murray
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - CL Dul
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - AM Mislowsky
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - CH Nash
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - PD Richards
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - LA Lee
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - L Stork-Sloots
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - F de Snoo
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - S Untch
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - M Gittleman
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - S Akbari
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| | - MC Rotkis
- Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN; Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston, Charleston, SC; The Breast Place, Charleston, SC; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Richmond, VA; Akron General Hospita, Akron, OH; St. John Hospital & Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Coastal Carolina Breast Center, Murrells Inlet, SC; Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville GA, Gainesville, GA; Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Palm Springs, CA; Agendia Inc, Irvine, CA; Breast Care Specialists, Allentown, PA; Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, IN
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul C, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. Abstract P4-14-29: One-third of HER2 positive patients have 80-gene luminal subtype that is resistant to chemo-trastuzumab but sensitive to chemo-trastuzumab-pertuzumab: Critical implications for the adjuvant setting from the NBRST phase 4 neoadjuvant study. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p4-14-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The phase 4 Neo-adjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST) enrolled over 1,000 US patients between June 2011 and December 2014. The aim of NBRST study is to compare chemo-sensitivity as defined by pathological Complete Response (pCR) using the 80-gene BluePrint (BP) functional subtype profile vs. conventional IHC/FISH subtyping. Treatment was at the discretion of the physician utilizing standard NCCN regimens. Pertuzumab, a monoclonal antibody, inhibits the dimerization of HER2 with other HER receptors. Pertuzumab received US FDA approval for the neo-adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in September 2013. Essentially all patients with HER2 positive cancers were treated with chemotherapy + trastuzumab and after this date pertuzumab was added, creating 2 distinct groups of Her2-treated patients.
The aim of the current analysis is to compare the pCR rate of chemo-trastuzumab (c-t) vs chemo-trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (c-t-p) by conventional and 80-gene BP functional subtype. 80-gene BP functional subtype was derived by supervised cluster analysis for concordant mRNA and protein expression.
Methods
The current analysis includes women from the NBRST study, with histologically proven breast cancer, who received neo-adjuvant treatment, had 80-gene subtyping and provided written informed consent. Pathological assessment of HER2 was performed according to ASCO CAP guidelines at the time of diagnosis. 80-gene BluePrint (BP) classifies patients into Luminal, HER2 or Basal-type. pCR is defined as T0/isN0. All pCRs were verified with a de-identified copy of the surgical pathology report. Fisher's exact test was used to compare pCR rates within different subgroups.
Results
286 IHC/FISH HER2+ patients received c-t (175) or c-t-p (111). Of these 80-gene BP subtype classified 53% as HER2-type, 33% as Luminal-type and 14% as Basal-type. 64% were ER positive.
The pCR rates and p-values within different subgroups of clinical HER2+ patients are provided in the table below.
c-tc-t-p (n)pCR ratep-valueTotal (n=286)41%57%0.01BP HER2 (153)58%73%0.06 BP Luminal (93) 6% 39% 0.0002BP Basal (40)45%1.0IHC/FISH HER2+/ER+ (183)31%53%0.003IHC/FISH HER2+/ER- (103)59%64%0.68
Conclusions
One-third of ASCO/CAP Her2+ patients had 80-gene BP Luminal subtype and demonstrated resistance to c-t (pCR 6%). Addition of Pertuzumab overcame resistance in this group (pCR 39%). This finding in the neoadjuvant setting suggests a substantial potential benefit in the adjuvant setting and thus an urgent need to consider treatment in at-risk patients as well as confirmatory tissue analysis from independently reported trials.
Citation Format: Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Beatty J, Pellicane JV, Murray MK, Dul C, Mislowsky AM, Nash CH, Richards PD, Lee LA, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F, Untch S, Gittleman M, Akbari S, Rotkis MC. One-third of HER2 positive patients have 80-gene luminal subtype that is resistant to chemo-trastuzumab but sensitive to chemo-trastuzumab-pertuzumab: Critical implications for the adjuvant setting from the NBRST phase 4 neoadjuvant study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Beitsch
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - P Whitworth
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - P Baron
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - J Beatty
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - JV Pellicane
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - MK Murray
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - C Dul
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - AM Mislowsky
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - CH Nash
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - PD Richards
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - LA Lee
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - L Stork-Sloots
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - F de Snoo
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - S Untch
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - M Gittleman
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - S Akbari
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| | - MC Rotkis
- Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX; Nashville Breast Center; Breast & Melanoma Specialists of Charleston; The Breast Place, Charleston; Virginia Breast Center, Bon Secours Cancer Institute; Akron General Hospital; St. John Region; Coastal Carolina Breast Center; Northeast Georgia Medical Center; Blue Ridge Cancer Care; Comprehensive Cancer Center; Agendia Inc; Breast Care Specialists; Virginia Hospital Center; Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li HY, Lee LA, Yu JF, Lo YL, Chen NH, Fang TJ, Hsin LJ, Lin WN, Huang CG, Cheng WN. Changes of snoring sound after relocation pharyngoplasty for obstructive sleep apnoea: the surgery reduces mean intensity in snoring which correlates well with apnoea-hypopnoea index. Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 40:98-105. [PMID: 25311724 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate objective changes of snoring after surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and correlate these with changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). DESIGN Prospective case series. SETTING A novel measurement, Snore Map, was used to analyse full-night snore sounds in terms of the maximal/mean intensity, peak/mean frequency, snoring index and energy type (Snore Map type, 0-4). Snore sound was classified into three bands according to frequency energy spectrum: B1 (40-300 Hz), B2 (301-850 Hz) and B3 (851-2000 Hz). PARTICIPANTS Thirty-four male and two female OSA patients (mean age, 39 years; mean AHI, 53.1/h; mean body mass index, 26.8 kg/m(2) ) with favourable anatomic structure were consecutively enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Parameters of polysomnographies and Snore Maps at baseline and six months after operation were compared. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS Thirty-two patients completed this study. The mean reduction in the total-snoring index was insignificant but there were significant decreases in total mean intensity, total peak frequency, total mean frequency and Snore Map type after surgery. There were also significant decreases in the mean intensity in all three bands, the snoring index in B2/B3 and the mean frequency in B1 postoperatively. Changes in the total mean intensity, total mean frequency, B2 mean intensity and B3 snoring index positively correlated with change in the AHI. CONCLUSIONS Relocation pharyngoplasty significantly decreases both the snoring sound intensity and snoring frequency. These reductions are directly proportional to the improvement of OSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Y Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sleep Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Sleep Medicine, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee LA, Briggs A, Edwards LD, Yang S, Pascoe S. A randomized, three-period crossover study of umeclidinium as monotherapy in adult patients with asthma. Respir Med 2014; 109:63-73. [PMID: 25464907 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2014] [Revised: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To our knowledge, no studies in patients with asthma have assessed a long-acting muscarinic antagonist in the absence of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). OBJECTIVE Evaluate the dose-response, efficacy, and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC) in patients with asthma not receiving ICS. METHODS In this double-blind, three-period crossover study, 350 subjects were randomized to a sequence of three of eight inhaled treatments: UMEC 15.6, 31.25, 62.5, 125, or 250 mcg once daily (OD), UMEC 15.6 or 31.25 mcg twice daily (BID), or placebo, administered for 14 days (12-14-day washout). Trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), 0-24-h weighted mean (WM) FEV1, and safety were assessed. Serial spirometry and pharmacokinetic assessments were performed in a subgroup. RESULTS Subjects had a mean baseline pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 71% and 88% predicted, respectively. Significant improvements in change from baseline trough FEV1 were observed for UMEC 15.6 OD (0.066 L; p = 0.036) and UMEC 125 OD (0.088 L; p = 0.005) versus placebo, but not other OD or BID doses. UMEC increased 0-24-h WM FEV1 versus placebo (0.068-0.121 L [p ≤ 0.017] with no clear dose-response). Treatment differences were similar for corresponding OD and BID doses in serial assessments. UMEC was rapidly absorbed, with evidence of some accumulation. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events was 9-21% for UMEC and 12% for placebo. There were no treatment-related effects on laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION The modest trough FEV1 improvements did not conclusively support a therapeutic benefit of UMEC in non-ICS treated patients with asthma. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT01641692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, United States.
| | - Anne Briggs
- R&D Projects, Clinical Platforms & Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT, UK
| | - Lisa D Edwards
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, United States
| | - Shuying Yang
- R&D Projects, Clinical Platforms & Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT, UK
| | - Steven Pascoe
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee LA, Yang S, Kerwin E, Trivedi R, Edwards LD, Pascoe S. The effect of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium in adult patients with asthma: a randomized, dose-ranging study. Respir Med 2014; 109:54-62. [PMID: 25452139 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the dose-response of umeclidinium (UMEC; a long-acting muscarinic antagonist) combined with fluticasone furoate (FF; an inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]) in patients with asthma. METHODS In a double-blind, three-period crossover study, 421 subjects (symptomatic on ICS), were randomized to a sequence of three of seven treatments: FF 100 mcg alone, FF 100 mcg combined with UMEC (15.6, 31.25, 62.5, 125, or 250 mcg), or vilanterol 25 mcg (a long-acting β-agonist), inhaled once-daily for 14 days (12-14-day washout). Trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and safety were assessed. RESULTS Period baseline was a significant covariate, indicating a potential carryover effect between treatment periods. Across all treatment periods, trough FEV1 improved with FF/UMEC 125 and 250 versus FF (treatment difference 0.055 L [both doses]; p = 0.018). FF/UMEC increased morning (15.9-22.9 L/min) and evening (16.2-28.8 L/min) PEF versus FF. As intended assessments were confounded, post hoc Period 1 data analyses were performed, demonstrating significant increases in trough FEV1 with FF/UMEC 31.25, 62.5, and 250 versus FF. Trough FEV1 improvements with FF/UMEC were greater in subjects with fixed (0.095-0.304 L) versus non-fixed (-0.084 to 0.041 L) obstruction. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events was 13-25% across groups. No treatment-related effects on laboratory parameters were reported. CONCLUSION FF/UMEC may be a viable treatment for patients with asthma symptomatic on ICS; benefit may be most prominent in those with fixed obstruction. The carryover effect suggests future UMEC studies should use an alternative design. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01573624.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USA.
| | - Shuying Yang
- Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, RD Projects Clinical Platforms & Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB11 1BT, UK
| | - Edward Kerwin
- Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, PC, Medford, OR, 97504, USA
| | - Roopa Trivedi
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USA
| | - Lisa D Edwards
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USA
| | - Steven Pascoe
- Respiratory Medicines Development Center, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-3398, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Family presence and participation in care in the NICU is fundamental to the recovery and well-being of the sick neonate and family. However, some NICU visitation policies are not supportive of families. A new visitor-management program was initiated at a local hospital. The program included open visitation for parents and others chosen by parents to be a support during their hospital stay. This quality-improvement project evaluated if there was any improvement in parents' perceptions and experiences of family-centered care after the implementation of the new visitor-management program. The NICU parent survey data revealed a modest positive difference in parent responses after the implementation of the program.
Collapse
|
30
|
Clarke JO, Sharaiha RZ, Kord Valeshabad A, Lee LA, Kalloo AN, Khashab MA. Through-the-scope transpyloric stent placement improves symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with gastroparesis. Endoscopy 2014; 45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E189-90. [PMID: 23824975 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J O Clarke
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
LaForce C, Journeay GE, Miller SD, Silvey MJ, Wu W, Lee LA, Chylack LT. Ocular safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a 2-year study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 111:45-50. [PMID: 23806459 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2012] [Revised: 04/06/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first study, to our knowledge, to evaluate the ocular effects of an intranasal corticosteroid during 2 years of treatment for perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). OBJECTIVE To assess ocular safety in adult and adolescent patients 12 years and older with PAR after 2 years of continuous treatment with fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS), 110 μg once daily, and placebo. METHODS This was a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of once-daily FFNS, 110 ìg, and placebo in 548 patients 12 years and older with PAR. The primary ocular safety end points were time to first occurrence of an event for the Lens Opacities Classification System, Version III (LOCS III), posterior subcapsular opacity (PSO) and time to first occurrence of an event for intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS On the basis of survival analyses, the difference between the treatment groups for time to first occurrence of a LOCS III PSO and time to first occurrence of an IOP event was not statistically significant (P = .39 and P = .34, respectively). Changes from baseline in visual acuity, LOCS III PSO, cortical opacity, LOCS III nuclear opacity and nuclear color, IOP, and horizontal cup-to-disc similar between treatment groups. There were no ophthalmic-related adverse events of LOCS III PSO or IOP that led to early withdrawal. The most common drug-related adverse event was epistaxis (FFNS, 28%; placebo, 14%). CONCLUSION These data neither support nor negate current recommendations for regular ophthalmic monitoring in patients treated with intranasal corticosteroids. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00682643.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig LaForce
- North Carolina Clinical Research, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Keith PK, Dymek A, Pfaar O, Fokkens W, Yun Kirby S, Wu W, Garris C, Topors N, Lee LA. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray reduces symptoms of uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Prim Care Respir J 2013; 21:267-75. [PMID: 22614920 DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is usually a self-limiting inflammatory condition often treated with antibiotics. AIMS To assess the safety and efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) compared with placebo for symptomatic relief of uncomplicated ARS. METHODS A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, 2-week treatment study of FFNS 110 μg once and twice daily was undertaken in adults/adolescents. RESULTS A statistically significant reduction was seen in the daily major symptoms score, a composite score of three individual symptoms (nasal congestion/stuffiness, sinus headache/pressure or facial pain/pressure, and postnasal drip on a 0-3 scale) by both FFNS doses compared with placebo (least square mean differences vs. placebo of -0.386 (p=0.008) and -0.357 (p=0.014) for once daily and twice daily FFNS, respectively). The differences in median times to symptom improvement were not statistically significant between each dose of FFNS (7 days) and placebo (8 days). There were no treatment differences in antibiotic use for possible fulminant bacterial rhinosinusitis (3% in each group). The safety profile of FFNS was similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS FFNS reduces symptoms of uncomplicated ARS compared with placebo and is well tolerated, providing support for withholding antibiotics in selected patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Fokkens WJ, Rinia B, van Drunen CM, Hellings PW, Hens G, Jansen A, Blom H, Wu W, Clements DS, Lee LA, Philpot EE. No mucosal atrophy and reduced inflammatory cells: active-controlled trial with yearlong fluticasone furoate nasal spray. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012; 26:36-44. [PMID: 22391079 DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) and mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) are well tolerated and more effective than placebo at relieving the symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. Effects of FFNS on the nasal histology have not been previously reported. This study examines the effects of FFNS and MFNS, administered daily for 1 year, on the nasal mucosa in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis. METHODS Subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis were randomized 1:1 to q.d., open-label treatment with FFNS, 110 μg, or MFNS, 200 μg, for 1 year. These groups and a healthy control group that did not receive study medication underwent nasal biopsies at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS The nasal biopsy population comprised 96 participants (37 using FFNS, 42 using MFNS, and 17 healthy controls). Epithelial thickness did not change appreciably from baseline to week 52 in any of the groups and mean change from baseline did not differ between FFNS and MFNS (least square mean difference, -0.001 mm, 95% confidence interval, -0.007, 0.006). Although not tested for significance, improvements over baseline were observed in epithelial histology in the FFNS group with more epithelium including intact columnar and ciliated epithelial cells. No appreciable change in the percentage of goblet cells was established. FFNS and MFNS were associated with decreases in epithelial and subepithelial nasal mucosal eosinophils and basophils from baseline to week 52. The percentage of subjects with no inflammatory cells at week 52 was 49 and 33% for eosinophils and 46 and 24% for basophils, for FFNS and MFNS, respectively. CONCLUSION Yearlong therapy with either FFNS or MFNS showed no changes in epithelial thickness or the percentage of goblet cells as well as a reduction in inflammatory cell infiltrate. FFNS was associated with improvements in epithelial histology. These data support the long-term safety of FFNS in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Keith P, Dymek A, Pfaar O, Fokkens W, Topors N, Wu W, Yun Kirby S, Lee LA. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects with uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2011. [PMCID: PMC3242205 DOI: 10.1186/1710-1492-7-s2-a41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
35
|
Abstract
Cutaneous lupus may occur in infancy as transient lesions associated with and probably caused by maternal autoantibodies, or later in childhood, associated with the endogenous development of autoimmunity. In this review, clinical findings, diagnosis, management, and pathogenesis of neonatal lupus are discussed, and the management of cutaneous lupus in children is detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Lee
- Dermatology Service, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO 80204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Andrews CP, Martin BG, Jacobs RL, Mohar DE, Diaz JD, Amar NJ, Kaiser HB, Vandewalker ML, Bernstein J, Toler WT, Prillaman BA, Dalal AA, Lee LA, Philpot EE. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is more effective than fexofenadine for nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc 2009; 30:128-38. [PMID: 19463203 DOI: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis are an important cause of sleep disturbance. Reduction of nasal symptoms, particularly nasal obstruction, has been linked to improvements in self-reported sleep quality. The enhanced-affinity intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone furoate and the oral antihistamine fexofenadine were compared with respect to nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group studies, patients received fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS),110 microg (study 1, n = 312; study 2, n = 224); fexofenadine, 180 mg (study 1, n = 311; study 2, n = 227); or placebo (study 1, n = 313; study 2, n = 229) once daily for 2 weeks. Fluticasone furoate was more effective (p < 0.001) than fexofenadine and placebo in both studies with respect to the mean changes from baseline over the treatment period in the nighttime symptoms score, nighttime reflective total nasal symptom score, predose instantaneous nasal symptom score, and morning peak nasal inspiratory flow. Fluticasone furoate was more effective than placebo (p <or= 0.001) in study 1 and more effective than both placebo and fexofenadine (p <or= 0.034) in study 2 with respect to the mean changes from baseline in the nighttime reflective total ocular symptom score and predose instantaneous total ocular symptom score. In these double-dummy studies, fexofenadine did not separate from placebo in comparisons of the nighttime symptoms score or the nighttime nasal or ocular symptom measures. The incidence of adverse events was similar among groups. FFNS once daily was more effective than fexofenadine and placebo with respect to nighttime sleep disturbance caused by seasonal allergy symptoms.
Collapse
|
37
|
Klein RQ, Bangert CA, Costner M, Connolly MK, Tanikawa A, Okawa J, Rose M, Fakharzadeh SS, Fiorentino D, Lee LA, Sontheimer RD, Taylor L, Troxel AB, Werth VP. Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159:887-94. [PMID: 18616782 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08711.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reliable and validated measures of skin disease severity are needed for cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM). Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI) and Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) skin indices have been developed as outcome instruments. OBJECTIVES We sought to demonstrate reliability and validity of the CDASI, and to compare the CDASI with other potential tools for use in measuring disease severity in cutaneous dermatomyositis. PATIENTS AND METHODS CDASI has four activity and two damage measures, with scores from 0 to 148. DSSI assesses activity based on body surface area and severity on a scale of 0-72. CAT uses 21 activity and damage items, for a range of 0-175 for activity and 0-33 for damage. Ten dermatologists used the instruments to score the same 12-16 patients in one session. Global validation measures were administered to physicians and patients. RESULTS Global validation measures correlated with the three outcome instruments (P < 0.0001). CAT displayed lower inter- and intrarater reliability relative to the CDASI. All scales correlate better with physician than patient global skin measures. CONCLUSIONS It appears that the CDASI may be a useful outcome measure for studies of cutaneous DM. Further testing to compare responsiveness of all three measures is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Q Klein
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Spruce Street, 2 Maloney Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mankad VS, Williams LW, Lee LA, LaBelle GS, Anstrom KJ, Burks AW. Safety of open food challenges in the office setting. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 100:469-74. [PMID: 18517080 DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60473-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open food challenges are a practical alternative to double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in confirming clinical sensitivity or tolerance to a food, and the risks associated with open challenges are unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine the safety of open food challenges administered in an office setting. METHODS A retrospective medical record review of open food challenges, administered in a university-based pediatric allergy-immunology clinic during a 3-year period, was performed. RESULTS A total of 109 patients (69% male) underwent 150 open food challenges, most of which were to milk (n = 39), peanut (n = 37), and egg (n = 29). There were 40 positive challenges (27% of all challenges) in 33 patients. Reactions were mild to moderate in 92% of positive challenges. Cutaneous reactions occurred in 68% of positive challenges, followed by gastrointestinal tract reactions (45%) and upper respiratory tract reactions (38%), excluding laryngeal symptoms. No patient had cardiovascular involvement. Food specific IgE values did not correlate with reaction severity. Interventions included observation or antihistamine only in 92% of positive challenges. No patient received epinephrine or required hospitalization. For negative challenges to milk, peanut, and egg, median prechallenge food specific IgE approached previously published negative predictive values for these foods. Negative challenges in patients allowed the introduction of 19 different foods into the diet of 88 patients. CONCLUSION Open food challenges are a safe procedure in the office setting for patients selected based on history and food specific IgE approaching negative predictive values.
Collapse
|
39
|
Green TD, LaBelle VS, Steele PH, Kim EH, Lee LA, Mankad VS, Williams LW, Anstrom KJ, Burks AW. Clinical characteristics of peanut-allergic children: recent changes. Pediatrics 2007; 120:1304-10. [PMID: 18055680 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-0350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal was to determine whether patients seen in a referral clinic are experiencing initial allergic reactions to peanuts earlier, compared with a similar population profiled at a different medical center 10 years ago, and to investigate other changes in clinical characteristics of the patients between the 2 groups. METHODS We reviewed the medical charts of peanut-allergic patients seen in the Duke University pediatric allergy and immunology clinic between July 2000 and April 2006. RESULTS The median ages of first peanut exposure and reaction were 14 and 18 months, respectively; the respective ages in a similar population profiled between 1995 and 1997 were 22 and 24 months. Within our patient group, those born before 2000 were first exposed to peanuts at a median age of 19 months and reacted at a median age of 21 months, compared with first exposure at 12 months and first reaction at 14 months for those born in or after 2000. Most patients (68%) demonstrated sensitization or clinical allergy to other foods (53% to eggs, 26% to cow's milk, 20% to tree nuts, 11% to fish, 9% to shellfish, 7% to soy, 6% to wheat, and 6% to sesame seeds). CONCLUSIONS In the past decade, the ages of first peanut exposure and reaction have declined among peanut-allergic children seen in a referral clinic. Egg allergy is very common in peanut-allergic patients, and sesame seeds should perhaps be considered one of the major food allergens. The decline in the age of first peanut reaction seems to be attributable to earlier exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd D Green
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hendrix CW, Fuchs EJ, Macura KJ, Lee LA, Parsons TL, Bakshi RP, Khan WA, Guidos A, Leal JP, Wahl R. Quantitative imaging and sigmoidoscopy to assess distribution of rectal microbicide surrogates. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007; 83:97-105. [PMID: 17507921 DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the distribution of microbicide and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) within the gastrointestinal tract is critical to development of rectal HIV microbicides. A hydroxyethylcellulose-based microbicide surrogate or viscosity-matched semen surrogate, labeled with gadolinium-DTPA (diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid) and 99mTechnetium-sulfur colloid, was administered to three subjects under varying experimental conditions to evaluate effects of enema, coital simulation, and microbicide or semen simulant over 5 h duration. Quantitative assessment used single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging, and sigmoidoscopic sampling. Over 4 h, radiolabel migrated cephalad in all studies by a median (interquartile range) of 50% (29-102%; P<0.001), as far as the splenic flexure (approximately 60 cm) in 12% of studies. There was a correlation in concentration profile between endoscopic sampling and SPECT assessments. HIV-sized particles migrate retrograde, 60 cm in some studies, 4 h after simulated ejaculation in our model. SPECT/CT, MRI, and endoscopy can be used quantitatively to facilitate rational development of microbicides for rectal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C W Hendrix
- Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Juhn YJ, Kita H, Lee LA, Smith RW, Bagniewski SM, Weaver AL, Pankratz VS, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Childhood asthma and human leukocyte antigen type. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 69:38-46. [PMID: 17212706 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2006.00719.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II genes and family history of asthma or atopy in relation to the incidence of childhood asthma. The objective of the study was to determine whether specific HLA class II genes (e.g., DRB1*03) are associated with asthma and whether such association explains the influences of family history of asthma or atopy on asthma incidence. A stratified random sample of 340 children who had HLA data available from the Rochester Family Measles Study cohort (n= 876) and a convenience sample of healthy children aged 5-12 years were the participants. We conducted comprehensive medical record reviews to determine asthma status of these children. The associations between the presence of specific HLA alleles and development of asthma and the role of family history of asthma or atopy in the association were evaluated by fitting Cox models. The cumulative incidence of asthma by 12 years of age among children who carry HLA DRB1*03 was 33%, compared to 24.2% among those who did not carry this allele. Adjusting for family history of asthma or atopy, gender, low birth weight, season of birth, HLA DRB1*04, and HLA DQB1*0302, the hazards ratio for HLA DRB1*03 carriers was 1.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.9, P= 0.020). We concluded that the HLA DRB1*03 allele is associated with asthma. However, the HLA class II gene does not explain the influences of family history of asthma or atopy on development of asthma. The mechanism underlying the association between asthma and HLA genes needs to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y J Juhn
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Banani N, Lee LA, Holl MR, Marquardt B, Troll M, Wilson DM. SLAP: design software for optimization of fluorescence analysis systems. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007; 2004:2086-9. [PMID: 17272133 DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2004.1403613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Initial results of a comprehensive design software that optimizes parameters for fluorescence analysis of a user-defined fluorophore are presented. SLAP (spectral LED aggregation program) automatically selects configurations of LEDs that, in a fluorescence analysis system, maximize the emission signal (useful output) as a function of the excitation signal (interference), optics, photodetection modality, and sample characteristics. Initial results draw on an extensive database of blue, blue-green, green and purple LEDs characterized across a range of nominal and overdrive operating conditions. Overdrive conditions enable spectral shifts of the LED excitation bands to enhance the overall flexibility of SLAP optimization. Representative results show a 70.1% improvement in collected signal for GFPuv fluorophores when compared to conventional LED-based fluorescence operated under nominal operating conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Banani
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Buchanan AD, Green TD, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Christie L, Althage KA, Steele PH, Pons L, Helm RM, Lee LA, Burks AW. Egg oral immunotherapy in nonanaphylactic children with egg allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 119:199-205. [PMID: 17208602 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2006] [Revised: 09/07/2006] [Accepted: 09/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no current active treatment for food allergy. Traditional injection immunotherapy has been proved unsafe, and thus there is a need for other forms of immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE The purpose was to study the safety and immunologic effects of egg oral immunotherapy (OIT). The short-term goal was to desensitize subjects to protect against accidental ingestion reactions. The eventual goal was to induce lasting clinical and immunologic tolerance. METHODS Subjects with a history of egg allergy but without a history of anaphylaxis to egg underwent a 24-month egg OIT protocol involving modified rush, build-up, and maintenance phases. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were performed at study conclusion. Egg-specific IgE and IgG concentrations were followed. RESULTS Seven subjects completed the protocol. Egg-specific IgG concentrations increased significantly, whereas egg-specific IgE concentrations did not significantly change. Three subjects tolerated known or possible accidental egg ingestions while receiving OIT. During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges at study conclusion, all tolerated significantly more egg protein than at study onset and than that found in the typical accidental exposure. Two subjects demonstrated oral tolerance. CONCLUSION This study provides proof of concept that OIT can be safely used for patients with egg allergy without a history of anaphylaxis to egg. Egg OIT does not heighten sensitivity to egg and might protect against reaction on accidental ingestion. Whether OIT will induce clinical oral tolerance cannot be concluded from this initial cohort. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Use of allergen-specific OIT to protect subjects with food allergy from reaction on accidental ingestion would represent a significant paradigm change in the treatment of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariana D Buchanan
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
A significant proportion of the population is either affected by or concerned about food allergy. Our knowledge about food allergens and how they stimulate the immune system has increased dramatically over the past decade. However, reasons for the increased prevalence of food allergy are not clear. The diagnosis of food allergy requires that the patient and caregivers examine all foods for the presence of potential allergens in order to prevent inadvertent ingestion and further reactions. Fortunately, many children develop tolerance to allergenic foods after a period of dietary elimination. Various immunotherapy approaches are under investigation to alleviate or prevent food-induced reactions in those who have persistent food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
The c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor plays a central role in many human cancers through the regulation of gene expression. Although the molecular mechanisms by which c-Myc and its obligate partner, Max, regulate gene expression are becoming better defined, genes or transcriptomes that c-Myc regulate are just emerging from a variety of different experimental approaches. Studies of individual c-Myc target genes and their functional implications are now complemented by large surveys of c-Myc target genes through the use of subtraction cloning, DNA microarray analysis, serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), chromatin immunoprecipitation, and genome marking methods. To fully appreciate the differences between physiological c-Myc function in normal cells and deregulated c-Myc function in tumors, the challenge now is to determine how the authenticated transcriptomes effect the various phenotypes induced by c-Myc and to define how c-Myc transcriptomes are altered by the Mad family of proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Lee
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Ross 1032, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lee LA, Soderholm SC, Flemmer MM, Hornsby-Myers JL. Field test results of an automated exposure assessment tool, the local positioning system (LPS). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 7:736-42. [PMID: 15986055 DOI: 10.1039/b503581c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A user-friendly environmental monitoring system that collects real time data has been developed. Flash card memory logs exposure data from multiple sensors along with corresponding times and positions. Optional use of telemetry repeaters and a reference station allows central monitoring of data to assess exposure and to initiate intervention when safe levels are exceeded. A software analysis package allows researchers to identify exposure hot spots and direct control efforts, with the ultimate goal being to reduce injury and disease. Preliminary field test results document position accuracy and system performance in harsh environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Lee
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Food allergic reactions have generated increasing concern in the United States, with approximately one fourth of American households altering their dietary habits because a member of the family is perceived to suffer from food allergies. IgE-mediated (type I) hypersensitivity accounts for most well-characterized food allergic reactions, although non-IgE-mediated immune mechanisms are believed to be responsible for a variety of hypersensitivity disorders. This article examines adverse food reactions that are IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and those entities that have characteristics of both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Scurlock
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 800 Marshall Street, Little Rock, AR 72207, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Albrecht J, Berlin JA, Braverman IM, Callen JP, Connolly MK, Costner MI, Dutz J, Fivenson D, Franks AG, Jorizzo JL, Lee LA, McCauliffe DP, Sontheimer RD, Werth VP. Dermatology position paper on the revision of the 1982 ACR criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2005; 13:839-49. [PMID: 15580979 DOI: 10.1191/0961203304lu2020oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The 1982 ACR classification criteria have become de facto diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but a review of the criteria is necessary to include recent diagnostic tests. The criteria were not developed with the help of dermatologists, and assign too much weight to the skin as one expression of a multiorgan disease. Consequently, patients with skin diseases are classified as SLE based mostly on skin symptoms. We discuss specific problems with each dermatologic criterion, but changes must await a new study. We suggest the following guidelines for such a study, aimed at revision of the criteria. 1) The SLE patient group should be recruited in part by dermatologists. 2) The study should evaluate an appropriate international ethnic/racial mix, including late onset SLE as well as pediatric patients. 3) All patients should have current laboratory and clinical evaluations, as suggested in the paper, to assure the criteria can be up-to-date. This includes anti-SS-A and anti-SS-B antibodies and skin biopsies for suspected cutaneous lupus erythematosus except for nonscarring alopecia and oral ulcers. 4) The study should be based on a series of transparent power calculations. 5) The control groups should represent relevant differential diagnoses in numbers large enough to assess diagnostic problems that might be specific to these differential diagnoses. In order to demonstrate specificity of the criteria with a 95% confidence interval between 90 and 100%, each control group of the above should have at least 73 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Albrecht
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) have been in practice for over 3 decades. More recently, NNPs have begun to take ownership for building their group practice models. The purpose of this article is to present a detailed case study demonstrating how one NNP group used a 4-phase strategic planning process to turn a crisis into an opportunity. The article describes data obtained during the strategic planning process from an informal national survey of NNP managers that focused on key benchmarks, such as role definition, responsibilities, protected nonclinical time, NNP salary and benefits, and educational and professional development support. Using the strategic planning process, the group defined mutually agreed upon minimum safe staffing levels for NNPs, interns, residents and neonatologists in their setting. Based on the data generated, the group successfully justified additional NNP positions and organizational support for 10% protected nonclinical time. A sample operational budget, comparison of 3 staffing scenarios, and a timeline are also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie A Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Ark, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fang TJ, Li HY, Shue CW, Lee LA, Wang PC. Efficacy of radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction of the soft palate in the treatment of snoring. Int J Clin Pract 2003; 57:769-72. [PMID: 14686565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional surgery for snoring often leads to intolerable postoperative pain. A new surgical treatment, radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction (RVTR) of the soft palate, was carried out and its effect and safety in the management of snoring were evaluated. Thirty-two patients received a single treatment of RVTR with a mean follow-up period of 4.5 months. All patients were assessed by a questionnaire using the Snore Outcomes Survey (SOS) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Postoperative pain, speech and swallowing disturbances were also evaluated. The postoperative scores of SOS and ESS all significantly improved (p<0.05). Postoperative pain, speech and swallowing disturbances were all mild 1-3 days after treatment. With the success of treatment defined as a postoperative snoring index (SI) of <3 or a reduction of the SI by >5 points by the visual analogue scale, the success rate was 81.3% in patients with a respiratory disturbance index (RDI) of <20, and 50% in those with an RDI of >20. We conclude that RVTR of the soft palate is an effective treatment for snoring, resulting in only mild postoperative discomfort. A patient whose RDI was <20 had a higher success rate with a single RVTR treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Fang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|