Organ Donation Following Neurologic and Circulatory Determination of Death

Organ Procurement Organization Donation Requestors Describe Barriers to Pediatric Organ Donation

OBJECTIVES

Organ procurement organization (OPO) donation requestor staff approach grieving families to discuss donating organs from their loved ones. We have carried out a qualitative study to explore the barriers that OPO donation requestor staff face in accessing pediatric families and requesting consent.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Qualitative methods using structured interviews (n = 31) and focus groups (n = 33 participants) with donation requestor OPO personnel.

SETTING

Phone interviews were conducted from November 2022 to January 2023, and focus groups were held at an August 2023 conference for donation and transplant professionals.

SUBJECTS

64 donation requestor OPO personnel.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Content analysis was used to code transcribed responses. Participants described a lack of access to pediatric families and portrayed clinical care teams as sometimes protective of the family or even preventing OPO staff from talking with the family. Participants shared potential solutions to overcome barriers, including fostering teamwork between clinical care teams and OPO staff and developing bridging language for clinicians to use when introducing donation requestors.

CONCLUSIONS

Donation requestors face unique challenges when approaching grieving pediatric families, and more multidisciplinary work is needed to improve communication.

Pediatric Organ Donation, Transplantation, and Updated Brain Death Criteria: An Overview for Pediatricians

Pediatricians follow patients longitudinally and hold a unique position to address multiple issues, medical and psychosocial, that affect organ donation and transplantation. They are wellpositioned to provide anticipatory guidance during well-child visits and during care for children with end-stage organ failure and can either assist these patients with ongoing medical management or refer these patients for organ transplantation assessment. A pediatrician's trusted relationship with families and patients allows for guidance on medical and ethical issues surrounding brain death, organ donation, and transplantation. A clear understanding of end-of-life care, criteria for the determination of neurologic and circulatory death, the process of organ donation, and posttransplant management is vital for pediatricians. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recognizes and supports the important role of the pediatrician in the global need for organ donation and transplantation awareness. This article, as well as the updated AAP policy on Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation and the revised American Academy of Neurology consensus statement for the determination of neurologic death for children and adults, provides guidance to help shape public opinion, public policy, and care of the pediatric organ donor and the transplant recipient.

What Italian PICU Healthcare Providers Think About Donation After Cardiocirculatory Determination of Death: A National Survey

BACKGROUND

Italy presently does not have a pediatric organ donation program after cardiocirculatory determination of death (pDCDD). Before implementing a pDCDD program, many centers globally have conducted studies on the attitudes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff. This research aims to minimize potential adverse reactions and evaluate the acceptance of the novel donation practice.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey on attitudes toward pDCDD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working at eight Italian PICUs. The survey had three parts: (I) questions about general demographic data; (II) 18 statements about personal wishes to donate, experience of discussing donation, and knowledge about donation; (III) attitudinal statements regarding two pediatric Maastricht III scenarios of organ donation.

RESULTS

The response rate was 54.4%, and the majority of respondents were nurses. Of those who responded, 45.3% worked in the Center, 40.8% in the North, and 12.8% in the South of Italy. In total, 93.9% supported pediatric organ and tissue donation, 90.3% supported donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD), 78.2% supported pDCDD, and 69.7% felt comfortable about the idea of participating in pDCDD on Type III patients, with a higher percentage of supportive responses in the Center (77.2%) than in the North (65.1%) and South (54.5%) of Italy (p-value < 0.004). Concerning scenarios, 79.3% of participants believed that organ retrieval took place in a patient who was already deceased. Overall, 27.3% considered their knowledge about DCDD to be adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides insight into the attitudes and knowledge of PICU staff members regarding pDCDD in Italy. Despite a general lack of knowledge on the subject, respondents showed positive attitudes toward pDCDD and a strong consensus that the Italian legislation protocol for determining death based on cardiocirculatory criteria respects the "dead donor rule." There were several distinctions among the northern, central, and southern regions of Italy, and in our view, these disparities can be attributed to the varying practices of commemorating the deceased. In order to assess how practice and training influence the attitude of PICU staff members, it would be interesting to repeat the survey after the implementation of a program.

Organ Donation in Canadian PICUs: A Cross-Sectional Survey, 2021-2022

OBJECTIVES

To understand contemporary pediatric organ donation programs in Canadian PICUs, including: policies and practices, data collection and reporting, and system and process barriers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey carried out 2021-2022.

SETTING

Canadian PICUs affiliated with a donor physician network.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric intensivists identified as the donation program lead, or most knowledgeable about donation for their institution.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 19-item survey was developed through collaboration with stakeholders from the organ donation and transplantation community within Canada. Domains and items were generated and reduced iteratively during an in-person workshop. Pretesting and pilot testing were completed to ensure readability, flow, clinical sensibility, and construct validity. Fifteen of 16 (94%) invited Canadian PICUs from seven provinces completed the survey representing 88% (15/18) of all noncardiac Canadian PICUs. Surveys were completed between June 2021 and September 2022. All units support donation after death by neurologic criteria (DNC); 14 of 15 indicated donation policies were in place and 1 of 15 indicated no policy but the ability to facilitate donation. Thirteen of 15 units (87%) support donation after death by circulatory criteria (DCC) with policies in place, with 11 of 13 of these indicating routine support of donation opportunities. The majority (13/15) of units identified a donation champion. Of the 16 identified champions across these centers, 13 were physicians and were registered nurses or nurse practitioners. Eight of 13 units (62%) with donation champions had positions supported financially, of which 5 units came from the Organ Donation Organization and the other 3 came from the provincial health authority. Finally, only 3 of 15 PICU donation programs have a pediatric donation committee with family involvement. Variability exists in identification (including determination of death practices), referral, and approach for donation between units.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all Canadian PICUs support donation after DNC donation, and most support donation after DCC, variability exists in the identification, referral, and approach of potential donors. There is a notable lack of family involvement in pediatric donation programs. There are many opportunities for standardization of PICU donation programs which may result in improved rates of pediatric organ donation in Canada.

Organ Dysfunction Among Children Meeting Brain Death Criteria: Implications for Organ Donation

OBJECTIVES

Over 70% of pediatric organ donors are declared deceased by brain death (BD) criteria. Patients with these devastating neurologic injuries often have accompanying multiple organ dysfunction. This study was performed to characterize organ dysfunction in children who met BD criteria and were able to donate their organs compared with those deemed medically ineligible.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

PICU at a quaternary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with International Classification of Diseases , 9th Edition codes corresponding to BD between 2012 and 2018 were included.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM)-III, and injury mechanisms were derived from the medical record. Organ dysfunction was quantified by evaluating peak daily organ-specific variables. Fifty-eight patients, from newborn to 22 years old, were included with a median PRISM-III of 34 (interquartile range [IQR], 26-36), and all met criteria for multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Thirty-four of 58 BD children (59%) donated at least one organ. Of the donors (not mutually exclusive proportions), 10 of 34 donated lungs, with a peak oxygenation index of 11 (IQR, 8-23); 24 of 34 donated their heart (with peak Vasoactive Inotrope Score 23 [IQR, 18-33]); 31 of 34 donated kidneys, of whom 16 of 31 (52%) had evidence of acute kidney injury; and 28 of 34 patients donated their liver, with peak alanine transferase (ALT) of 104 U/L (IQR, 44-268 U/L) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of 165 U/L (IQR, 94-434 U/L). Organ dysfunction was similar between heart and lung donors and respective medically ineligible nondonors. Those deemed medically ineligible to donate their liver had higher peak ALT 1,518 U/L (IQR, 986-1,748 U/L) ( p = 0.01) and AST 2,200 U/L (IQR, 1,453-2,405 U/L) ( p = 0.01) compared with liver donors.

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center experience, all children with BD had MODS, yet more than one-half were still able to donate organs. Future research should further evaluate transplant outcomes of dysfunctional organs prior to standardizing donation eligibility criteria.

Exploring Ethical Dimensions of Physician Involvement in Requests for Organ Donation in Pediatric Brain Death

Pediatric organ transplantation remains a life-saving therapy, with donated organs being absolutely scarce resources. Efforts to both increase pediatric organ donation authorization by families of children declared dead by neurologic criteria and mitigate perception of conflicts of interest have resulted in frequent exclusion of physicians from this process. This article provides of focused review of pediatric organ donation in the setting of brain death, explores the breadth of consequences of physician exclusion in donation authorization requests, and provides an ethical framework defending physician involvement in the organ donation process for this patient population.

Differential donor management of pediatric vs adult organ donors and potential impact on pediatric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite clinical progress over time, a shortage of suitable donor organs continues to limit solid organ transplantation around the world. Lungs are the organs most likely to be assessed as unsuitable during donor management among all transplantable organs. Although the number of lung transplants performed in children is limited, death on the wait list remains a barrier to transplant success for many potential transplant candidates. Optimizing organ donor management can yield additional organs for transplant candidates.

METHODOLOGY

We accessed the Donor Management Goal (DMG) Registry to evaluate the efficiency and efficacy of donor management in the procurement of lungs for transplantation. Further, we stratified donors by age and compared pediatric age cohorts to adult cohorts with respect to attainment of donor management target goals and successful pathway to transplantation. We utilized recipient data from the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) to put this data into context. The DMG bundle consists of nine physiologic parameters chosen as end-points guiding donor management for potential organ donors. The number of parameters fulfilled has been regarded as an indication of efficacy of donor management.

RESULTS

We noted a markedly lower number of organ donors in the pediatric age group compared to adults. On the other hand, the number of donors greatly exceeds the number of infants, children and adolescents who undergo lung transplantation. Organs transplanted per donor peaks in the adolescent age group. At initial donor referral, DMG bundle attainment is lower in all age groups and improves during donor management. With respect to oxygenation, there is less overall improvement in younger donors compared to older donors during donor management. When donors who yield lungs for transplantation are compared to those whose lungs were not transplanted, oxygenation improved more substantially during donor management. Furthermore, improved oxygenation correlated with the total number of organs transplanted per donor.

CONCLUSIONS

In the face of continued wait list mortality on the pediatric lung transplant wait list, the number of young donors may not be a limiting factor. We believe that this dataset provides evidence that management of young pediatric donors is not as consistent or efficient as the management of older donors, potentially limiting the number of life-saving organs for pediatric lung transplant candidates. Across all ages, optimizing donor lung management may increase the potential to transplant multiple other organs.

Death and Dying in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Multicenter, Multinational Study

Background: For hospitalized children admitted outside of a critical care unit, the location, mode of death, "do-not-resuscitate" order (DNR) use, and involvement of palliative care teams have not been described across high-income countries. Objective: To describe location of death, patient and terminal care plan characteristics of pediatric inpatient deaths inside and outside the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Design: Secondary analysis of inpatient deaths in the Evaluating Processes of Care and Outcomes of Children in Hospital (EPOCH) randomized controlled trial. Setting/Subjects: Twenty-one centers from Canada, Belgium, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Measurement: Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient and terminal care plan characteristics. A multivariable generalized estimating equation examined if palliative care consult during hospital admission was associated with location of death. Results: A total of 365 of 144,539 patients enrolled in EPOCH died; 219 (60%) died in PICU and 143 (40%) died on another inpatient unit. Compared with other inpatient wards, patients who died in PICU were less likely to be expected to die, have a DNR or palliative care consult. Hospital palliative care consultation was more common in older children and independently associated with a lower adjusted odds (95% confidence interval) of dying in PICU [0.59 (0.52-0.68)]. Conclusion: Most pediatric inpatient deaths occur in PICU where patients were less likely to have a DNR or palliative care consult. Palliative care consultation could be better integrated into end-of-life care for younger children and those dying in PICU.

Successful strategies to increase organ donation: the Gift of Life Donor Program Philadelphia model

Organ donation connects the ending of one life with the renewal of another. Acute care hospitals care for the organ donor and transplant organizations complete life-saving surgeries. Between them is a vital component: a less-known medical team dedicated to ensuring that organ donation and transplantation are possible. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) support grieving families during a painful time of loss, providing a rare and precious opportunity in donation. The OPO is simultaneously poised to ensure that organs successfully begin their journey to renewing life and restoring hope for recipients and their loved ones. Every OPO faces a myriad of challenges in meeting its responsibilities. A recognized leader in the field, Gift of Life Donor Program (GLDP) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania has been committed to meeting these challenges for nearly fifty years. The successes of this OPO reflect the legacies of organ donors, recipients, and their cherished loved ones.

Lack of knowledge and experience highlights the need for a clear paediatric organ and tissue donation protocol in the Netherlands

Aim

This study explored the attitudes of medical professionals to organ and tissue donation in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands. It also examined their compliance with the existing Dutch donation protocol and assessed whether a paediatric donation protocol was needed.

Methods

We invited 966 professionals working in all eight PICUs and the two largest NICUs to complete an online survey from December 2016 until April 2017.

Results

A quarter (25%) took part and they included PICU intensivists, neonatologists, nurses and other health and allied professionals. Most were female and nurses. More than half (54%) of the PICU respondents considered paediatric organ donation to be very important and 53% supported tissue donation. In contrast, only 22% of the NICU respondents believed that both neonatal organ and tissue donation were very important. Familiarity and compliance with the existing national donation protocol were low. PICU nurses had significantly less experience than PICU intensivists and felt less comfortable with the donation process. None of the NICU respondents had prior donation experience.

Conclusion

Paediatric intensive care units and NICU professionals lack specialised knowledge and experience on organ and tissue donation. A comprehensive and clear paediatric donation protocol is clearly needed.