Enteral Feeding of Children on Noninvasive Respiratory Support: A Four-Center European Study

Obstacles to meeting nutritional recommendations in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

Optimal nutrition is associated with positive outcomes in critically ill children. In 2017, the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) updated guidelines for nutritional support for this population. However, implementation of these guidelines may be delayed due to clinical barriers. We aimed to assess our practice against the recommendations of the ASPEN guidelines, hypothesizing that caregiver bias and clinical factors may hinder their implementation in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

We focused on two ASPEN recommendations: (1) feeding within 48 h (48H) of admission and (2) meeting two thirds of estimated caloric requirements after seven calendar days. All children aged 1 month to 16 years admitted to our PICU from July 2017 to January 2020 were eligible. Using a retrospective chart review, nutritional and clinical data were collected at the time of admission, at 48H, and 7 calendar days after admission.

RESULTS

A total of 533 patients were included. After 48H of admission to the PICU, 402 out of 533 (75.4%) patients received feeding. The following factors were associated with not reaching nutritional goals at 48H: invasive ventilation support, inotropic and vasoactive support, and extracorporeal life support. After 7 days, 95 out of 118 (80.5%) received two thirds of caloric needs. At 7 days, the main obstacle to meeting caloric goals was invasive ventilation.

CONCLUSION

In a representative tertiary PICU, barriers to meeting ASPEN nutritional recommendations included hemodynamic instability or invasive ventilator support, especially within the first 48H of admission.

Enteral feeding in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis requiring non-invasive support via nasal interface

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The benefits of enteral feeding in critically ill children have been well described, but the use of non-invasive respiratory support has been shown to delay initiation of feeds, in part due to safety concerns. We aimed to examine the association of enteral feeding by mouth and orogastric tube on clinically significant adverse events in children with bronchiolitis being treated with non-invasive respiratory support via nasal interfaces.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients 0-24 months of age between 2016 and 2022 in a quaternary care hospital pediatric intensive care unit with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis and treatment with non-invasive respiratory support via nasal interface. Standard comparative statistics and multivariable regression were used to determine the association between oral and nasogastric feeding and clinically significant outcomes such as new diagnosis of pneumonia and escalation in respiratory support, as well lengths of stay.

RESULTS

There were 407 patients 24 months or younger who were admitted with bronchiolitis and treated with non-invasive respiratory support. There was a 4.65 increased odds of developing a new pneumonia for patients who were fed nasogastrically versus orally. There were no differences in the development of pneumonia based on type of respiratory support, whether an escalation in respiratory support was needed, or based on the highest level of support received. Both pediatric intensive care unit and overall hospital lengths of stay were decreased in those who were orally fed.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral feeding in children with bronchiolitis receiving non-invasive respiratory support appears to be safe and not associated with escalation in support or new diagnoses of pneumonia. Oral feeds were associated with decreased lengths of stay. Further work is needed to assess long term safety and ability to achieve adequate nutritional requirements.

IMPACT

Enteral feeding of children with bronchiolitis requiring non-invasive respiratory support via nasal interfaces did not have an effect on clinically significant adverse events Feeding by mouth led to decreased risk of pneumonia and shorter inpatient length of stay Future work is needed to study the ability to achieve nutrition goals when feeding by mouth on non-invasive support.

The Implementation of a Feeding Protocol in Patients With Noninvasive Ventilation Improves Enteral Nutrition: The NIVEN Study

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence to guide the treatment of enteral nutrition (EN) for children with bronchiolitis who receive biphasic positive airway pressure (BiPAP) support.

METHODS

This quality improvement project included patients with bronchiolitis who were supported by BiPAP ventilation. An algorithm to increase EN treatment in those patients was created by stakeholders. Two periods of time were compared: group 1 (January 2023 to August 2023) without nutrition implementation protocol vs group 2 (September 2023 to February 2024) after the protocol was implemented. EN was provided via nasogastric tubes. The project aim was to decrease the mean time to initiation of EN by 50% after the start of BiPAP. Secondary end points were time to reach target calories (100 kcal/kg/d), BiPAP total duration, and the proportion of patients with adverse effects.

RESULTS

For the 102 included patients (48 before and 54 after BiPAP ventilation), the median time to the start of EN decreased from 18 (8-26) hours to 6 (2-8) hours (P < 0.05) Median time to reach calorie goal decreased from 103 (85-120) hours to 48 hours (36-60) (P < 0.05). There were no differences in noninvasive ventilation mean duration. No episodes of aspiration or other adverse effects were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a standardized pathway for EN in patients with BiPAP was associated with faster initiation of EN and a shorter time to reaching caloric goals without any observed adverse events. Although our sample was small, the findings suggest that more aggressive enteral feeding should be considered in patients receiving noninvasive ventilation.

[Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure. Clinical Practice Guidelines - on behalf of the German Society of Pneumology and Ventilatory Medicine]

The guideline update outlines the advantages as well as the limitations of NIV in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in daily clinical practice and in different indications.Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has a high value in therapy of hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, as it significantly reduces the length of ICU stay and hospitalization as well as mortality.Patients with cardiopulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oxygen in addition to necessary cardiological interventions. This should be done already prehospital and in the emergency department.In case of other forms of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with only mild or moderately disturbed gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 > 150 mmHg) there is no significant advantage or disadvantage compared to high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). In severe forms of ARDS NIV is associated with high rates of treatment failure and mortality, especially in cases with NIV-failure and delayed intubation.NIV should be used for preoxygenation before intubation. In patients at risk, NIV is recommended to reduce extubation failure. In the weaning process from invasive ventilation NIV essentially reduces the risk of reintubation in hypercapnic patients. NIV is regarded useful within palliative care for reduction of dyspnea and improving quality of life, but here in concurrence to HFNO, which is regarded as more comfortable. Meanwhile NIV is also recommended in prehospital setting, especially in hypercapnic respiratory failure and pulmonary edema.With appropriate monitoring in an intensive care unit NIV can also be successfully applied in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.

Association of enteral feeds in critically ill bronchiolitis patients supported by high-flow nasal cannula with adverse events and outcomes

To study association of enteral feeds in bronchiolitis patients supported by different levels of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with adverse events, nutritional goals, and clinical outcomes. Bronchiolitis patients ≤ 24 months of age treated with < 1 L/kg/min, 1-2 L/kg/min and > 2 L/kg/min of HFNC between January 2014 and December 2021 were studied retrospectively at a tertiary care children's hospital. Adverse events (aspiration pneumonia, emesis, and respiratory support escalation), nutritional goals (initiation of enteral feeds, achievement of nutritional goal volume and goal calories, percentage weight change during hospital stay) and clinical outcomes (HFNC duration, oxygen supplementation duration after HFNC, length of hospital stay following HFNC support, total length of hospital stay and follow-up for 1 month after hospital discharge) were compared between fed and non-fed patients on HFNC. Six hundred thirty-six (489 fed and 147 not-fed) bronchiolitis patients on HFNC studied. 260 patients, 317 patients and 59 patients were supported by < 1 L/kg/min, 1-2 L/kg/min and > 2 L/kg/min of HFNC, respectively. Enterally fed patients had significantly less adverse events (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.083 - 0.23, p < 0.001), significantly better nutritional goals: earlier initiation of enteral feeds by 65% in time (mean ratio = 0.35, 95% CI 0.28 - 0.43, p < 0.001), earlier achievement of goal volume and goal calorie needs by 14% in time (mean ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p = 0.005) and significantly better clinical outcomes: shorter HFNC duration by 29.75 h (95% CI 20.19 -39.31, p < 0.001), shorter oxygen supplementation duration after HFNC by 12.14 h (95% CI 6.70 -17.59, p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay after HFNC support by 21.35 h (95% CI 14.71-27.98, p < 0.001) and shorter total length of hospital stay by 51.10 h (95% CI 38.65 -63.55, p < 0.001), as compared to non-fed patients, after adjusting for age, weight, prematurity, comorbidities, admission time, admission bronchiolitis score, admission respiratory rate, and HFNC levels. The number of revisits and readmissions at 7 and 30 days after hospital discharge were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between the fed and non-fed groups.    Conclusion: Enteral feeding of bronchiolitis patients supported by different levels of HFNC is associated with less adverse events and better nutrition goals and clinical outcomes. What is Known: •There is general apprehension to feed critically ill bronchiolitis patients supported by high flow nasal cannula. What is New: •Our study reveals that enteral feeding of critically ill bronchiolitis patients supported by different levels of high flow nasal cannula is associated with minimal adverse events, better nutritional goals and improved clinical outcomes as compared to non-fed patients.

A Retrospective Study of Complications of Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Children on Noninvasive Ventilation

The utilization of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), to support children with respiratory failure and avoid endotracheal intubation, has increased. Current guidelines recommend initiating enteral nutrition (EN) within the first 24-48 h post admission. This practice remains variable among PICUs due to perceptions of a lack of safety data and the potential increase in respiratory and gastric complications. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the association between EN and development of extraintestinal complications in children 0-18 years of age on NIV for acute respiratory failure. Of 332 patients supported with NIV, 249 (75%) were enterally fed within the first 48 h of admission. Respiratory complications occurred in 132 (40%) of the total cohort and predominantly in non-enterally fed patients (60/83, 72% vs. 72/249, 29%; p < 0.01), and they occurred earlier during ICU admission (0 vs. 2 days; p < 0.01). The majority of complications were changes in the fraction of inspired oxygen (220/290, 76%). In the multivariate evaluation, children on bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) (23/132, 17% vs. 96/200, 48%; odds ratio [OR] = 5.3; p < 0.01), receiving a higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) (0.42 vs. 0.35; OR = 6; p = 0.03), and with lower oxygen saturation (SpO₂) (91% vs. 97%; OR = 0.8; p < 0.01) were more likely to develop a complication. Time to discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) was longer for patients with complications (11 vs. 3 days; OR = 1.12; p < 0.01). The large majority of patients requiring NIV can be enterally fed without an increase in respiratory complications after an initial period of ICU stabilization.

Early vs late enteral nutrition in pediatric intensive care unit: Barriers, benefits, and complications

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to define the existing barriers for early enteral nutrition (EEN) in critically ill children and to analyze the differences in nutrient supply, complications, and outcomes between EEN and late EN (LEN).

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational, prospective study including critically ill children receiving EN. Variables analyzed included demographic and anthropometric features, caloric and nutrient supply, outcomes, and complications according to the EN onset. Patients were classified into two groups according to the start of EN: 24-EEN vs EN started after 24 h (24-LEN) and 48-EEN vs EN started after 48 h (48-LEN).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight children were enrolled; 22.1% received 24-EEN, and 67.6% received 48-EEN. EN was most frequently delayed in patients older than 12 months, in patients with cardiac disease, and in those requiring mechanical ventilation (MV). Children in the 24-EEN group had shorter duration of MV compared with those in the 24-LEN group (P = 0.04). The 48-EEN group received a higher caloric intake (P = 0.04), reached the caloric target earlier (P < 0.01), and had lower incidence of constipation (P = 0.01) than the 48-LEN group. There was a positive correlation between the time required to reach the maximum caloric intake and the length of pediatric intensive care stay (r = 0.46; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

EEN may improve nutrient delivery, reduce time on MV, and prevent constipation in critically ill children. No relevant differences between 24-EEN and 48-EEN were found. Cardiac disease, MV, and age older than 12 months were risk factors associated with LEN.

Prevalence, Risk Factors and Impact of Nutrition Interruptions in Critically Ill Children

Background: Enteral nutrition interruptions (ENI) are prevalent in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), but there is little evidence of their characteristics. Methods: This is a cross-sectional multicenter study including critically ill children on enteral nutrition. ENIs were classified as PICU procedures, procedures performed outside the PICU (PPOP), feeding intolerance and other criteria. The number and features of ENIs were collected. Results: A total of 75 children were enrolled. There were 41 interruptions affecting 37.3% of the patients with a median duration of 5 ± 9.4 h. The most common reason for ENI was PPOP (41.5%), followed by other criteria. Interruptions were considered preventable in 24.4% of the cases, but only eight were compensated. ENIs were more prevalent among children with cardiac disease (p = 0.047), higher PRISM (p = 0.047) and longer PICU stay (p = 0.035). There was association between PRISM and total interruption time (p = 0.02) and lower caloric intake (p = 0.035). Patients with respiratory illness (p = 0.022) and on noninvasive ventilation (p = 0,028) had fewer ENIs. ENI total time was associated with lower caloric (p = 0.001) and protein (p = 0.02) intake. Conclusions: ENIs are prevalent in PICU, especially in children with higher PRISM, longer PICU stays and cardiac disease, and result in lower caloric and protein intake.

Clinical practice guidelines: management of severe bronchiolitis in infants under 12 months old admitted to a pediatric critical care unit

PURPOSE

We present guidelines for the management of infants under 12 months of age with severe bronchiolitis with the aim of creating a series of pragmatic recommendations for a patient subgroup that is poorly individualized in national and international guidelines.

METHODS

Twenty-five French-speaking experts, all members of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) (Algeria, Belgium, Canada, France, Switzerland), collaborated from 2021 to 2022 through teleconferences and face-to-face meetings. The guidelines cover five areas: (1) criteria for admission to a pediatric critical care unit, (2) environment and monitoring, (3) feeding and hydration, (4) ventilatory support and (5) adjuvant therapies. The questions were written in the Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) format. An extensive Anglophone and Francophone literature search indexed in the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase was performed using pre-established keywords. The texts were analyzed and classified according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. When this method did not apply, an expert opinion was given. Each of these recommendations was voted on by all the experts according to the Delphi methodology.

RESULTS

This group proposes 40 recommendations. The GRADE methodology could be applied for 17 of them (3 strong, 14 conditional) and an expert opinion was given for the remaining 23. All received strong approval during the first round of voting.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines cover the different aspects in the management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted to pediatric critical care units. Compared to the different ways to manage patients with severe bronchiolitis described in the literature, our original work proposes an overall less invasive approach in terms of monitoring and treatment.

Feeding Pathway for Children on High Flow Nasal Cannula Decreases Time to Enteral Nutrition

High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) is commonly used for children with respiratory failure, yet no standardized guidelines exist on how to initiate, escalate, and maintain enteral nutrition (EN) for these patients. EN in critically ill children is associated with decreased hospital length of stay, decreased ventilator days, and fewer acquired infections. We aimed to decrease the mean time to EN initiation by 50% after the start of HFNC in 6 months.

METHODS

This quality improvement project used the Model for Improvement to inform interventions. A multidisciplinary team created an EN pathway for critically ill patients on HFNC. We conducted Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles related to implementing a standardized pathway for EN on HFNC. The primary outcome was time to EN initiation once on HFNC. Secondary outcomes were time to goal caloric EN, duration of HFNC, and adverse events. Outcomes were plotted on statistical process control charts and analyzed for special cause variation between baseline and intervention periods.

RESULTS

We included 112 patients in the study. Special cause variation occurred for both primary and secondary outcomes. The mean time to EN initiation decreased from 24.6 hours to 11.7 hours (47.5%). Mean time to goal feeds decreased from 25.8 hours to 15.1 hours (58.5%). Mean HFNC duration did not show any special cause variation. There were no episodes of aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a standardized pathway for EN on patients receiving HFNC resulted in decreased time to initiation of EN and time to goal caloric EN with no significant increase in adverse events.

Commentary on High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Practices After the First-Line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children Trials

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are commonly used to treat children admitted to the PICU who require more respiratory support than simple oxygen therapy. Much has been published on these two treatment modalities over the past decade, both in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM ) and elsewhere. The majority of these studies are observational analyses of clinical, administrative, or quality improvement datasets and, therefore, are only able to establish associations between exposure to treatment and outcomes, not causation. None of the initial randomized clinical trials comparing HFNC and CPAP were definitive due to their relatively small sample sizes with insufficient power for meaningful clinical outcomes (e.g., escalation to bilevel noninvasive ventilation or intubation, duration of PICU-level respiratory support, mortality) and often yielded ambiguous findings or conflicting results. The recent publication of the First-Line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children (FIRST-ABC) trials represented a major step toward understanding the role of CPAP and HFNC use in critically ill children. These large, pragmatic, randomized clinical trials examined the efficacy of CPAP and HFNC either for "step up" (i.e., escalation in respiratory support) during acute respiratory deterioration or for "step down" (i.e., postextubation need for respiratory support) management. This narrative review examines the body of evidence on HFNC published in PCCM , contextualizes the findings of randomized clinical trials of CPAP and HFNC up to and including the FIRST-ABC trials, provides guidance to PICU clinicians on how to implement the literature in current practice, and discusses remaining knowledge gaps and future research priorities.

Treatment of Pediatric Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Considerations for Oral Feeding: A Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) has become an increasingly common means of noninvasive respiratory support in pediatrics and is being used in infants and children with respiratory distress both inside and outside of the intensive care units. Despite the widespread use of HFNC, there remains a paucity of data on optimal flow rates and its impact on morbidity, mortality, and desired outcomes. Given the scarcity of information in these critical areas, it is not surprising that guidelines for initiation of oral feeding do not exist. This review article will review HFNC mechanisms of action, its use in specific populations and settings, and finally what is known about initiation of feeding during this therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of withholding oral feeding solely, because of HFNC, is not supported in the literature at the time of this writing, but in the absence of safety data from clinical trials, clinicians should proceed with caution and consider patient-specific factors while making decisions about oral feeding. Well-controlled prospective clinical trials are needed for development of best practice clinical guidelines and attainment of optimal outcomes.

Occurrence and risk factors associated with seizures in infants with severe bronchiolitis

Neurological morbidity is a growing concern in children with severe bronchiolitis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of occurrence and the factors associated with seizures in very young infants < 3 months of age, admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for severe bronchiolitis. We performed a single center retrospective cohort study evaluating occurrence of seizures in infants admitted to the PICU between 2010 and 2018 for severe bronchiolitis. We described characteristics of the patients, laboratory test, brain imaging, and electroencephalogram results, as well as the treatment used. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with the occurrence of seizures. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 805 patients were included in the study; 722 (89.6%) were mechanically ventilated. Twenty-six infants (3.2%, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI [2.1%; 4.7%]) had seizures shortly prior to admission or during PICU stay. In the multivariable analysis, hyponatremia (odds ratio, OR: 4.6, 95%CI [1.86; 11.43], p = 0.001) and invasive ventilation (OR: 2.6, 95% CI [1.14; 5.9], p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of seizures occurrence.Conclusion: Seizures occur in at least 3% of very young infants with severe bronchiolitis, and the characteristics of these are different to those experienced by older infants, but they shared the same risk factors (hyponatremia and mechanical ventilation). This highlights the extrapulmonary morbidity associated with bronchiolitis in this population. What is Known: • Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of pediatric intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation in infants. • Neurological morbidities have to be investigated in this population at risk of neurological complications. What is New: • Seizure is a complication in at least 3% of very young infants with severe bronchiolitis. • Seizure characteristics are different, but the main risk factors are the same than in older infants (hyponatremia and mechanical ventilation).

A Retrospective Analysis of Feeding Practices and Complications in Patients with Critical Bronchiolitis on Non-Invasive Respiratory Support

Limited data exist regarding feeding pediatric patients managed on non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) modes that augment oxygenation and ventilation in the setting of acute respiratory failure. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to explore the safety of feeding patients managed on NRS with acute respiratory failure secondary to bronchiolitis. Children up to two years old with critical bronchiolitis managed on continuous positive airway pressure, bilevel positive airway pressure, or RAM cannula were included. Of the 178 eligible patients, 64 were reportedly nil per os (NPO), while 114 received enteral nutrition (EN). Overall equivalent in severity of illness, younger patients populated the EN group, while the NPO group experienced a higher incidence of intubation. Duration of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit and non-invasive respiratory support were shorter in the NPO group, though intubation eliminated the former difference. Within the EN group, ninety percent had feeds initiated within 48 h and 94% reached full feeds within 7 days of NRS initiation, with an 8% complication and <1% aspiration rate. Reported complications did not result in escalation of respiratory support. Notably, a significant improvement in heart rate and respiratory rate was noted after feeds initiation. Taken together, our study supports the practice of early enteral nutrition in patients with critical bronchiolitis requiring NRS.