Performance of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty After Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing Implementation

Bone and Joint Infections in Children With Sickle Cell Disease in French Guiana: A 13-Year Retrospective Multicenter Review

INTRODUCTION

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder with a high infectious morbidity and mortality and a heterogeneous distribution in France. One of the challenges is to differentiate a bone and joint infection (BJI) from a vaso-occlusive crisis. This challenge is particularly prevalent in French Guiana, an overseas territory with the highest incidence of SCD in France. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of BJI in children with SCD in French Guiana.

METHOD

This was a retrospective multicentric descriptive study of SCD patients living in French Guiana aged under 18 and diagnosed with a BJI between 2010 and 2022. These BJI were divided into 2 groups: those with microbiological documentation (d-BJI) and those without microbiological identification (ud-BJI).

RESULTS

A total of 53 episodes of BJI in 42 patients (mean age 7.2 years) were reported. Clinical symptoms on arrival were comparable between the d-BJI and ud-BJI groups. Patients in the d-BJI group had longer average hospital stays (40.4 days vs. 16.8 days, P = 0.01) and Salmonella spp. were the most identified bacteria (n = 8/13). White blood cell count was greater in the d-BJI group (30.3 G/L vs. 18.G/L, P = 0.01) and a collection was more frequently identified on imaging (11/13 vs. 16/40, P = 0.01) in this group. Initial in-hospital antibiotic therapy was longer in the d-BJI group (17.2 days vs. 12.8, P = 0.02), as were infection-related complications (9/13 vs. 12/40 P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

BJI in children with SCD is not sufficiently microbiologically documented. Progress must be made to improve the documentation of BJI.

Characterizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing in Pediatric Emergency Departments

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear which pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) credentialing process or if this process is consistent per expert guidelines. Our objective was to describe formalized POCUS credentialing processes across PEDs that are active in the pediatric emergency medicine POCUS (P2) Network.

METHODS

A survey was developed from nationally recommended credentialing guidelines. This anonymous survey was sent out to the P2 Network comprising more than 230 members involved in pediatric POCUS. The survey was analyzed using descriptive analysis with counts and percentages.

RESULTS

A total of 36 PEDs responded to the survey. All departments had a faculty member in charge of maintaining the credentialing process, and all faculty members had POCUS education available; 88.6% of education was scheduled didactics or bedside teaching. There were 80.6% of PEDs that had a process for internally credentialing faculty. Some PEDs offered protected education for POCUS, however, 44.8% had <50% of their faculty credentialed. There were 4 PEDs that offered incentives for completion of POCUS credentialing including salary bonuses; only 1 offered shift buy down as incentive. That PED had 100% of its faculty credentialed. All PEDs performed quality assurance on POCUS scans done in the ED, most done weekly. Billing for scans occurred in 26 PEDs. Skin/soft tissue and focused assessment with sonography for trauma were the 2 most common applications credentialed.

CONCLUSIONS

Among PEDs surveyed, there was a lack of standardization of POCUS resources and components of credentialing. Incentives may be beneficial in improving credentialing faculty and standardizing the credentialing process.

Point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesiology: considerations for training and credentialing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss considerations surrounding the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in pediatric anesthesiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

POCUS is an indispensable tool in various medical specialties, including pediatric anesthesiology. Credentialing for POCUS should be considered to ensure that practitioners are able to acquire images, interpret them correctly, and use ultrasound to guide procedures safely and effectively. In the absence of formal guidelines for anesthesiology, current practice and oversight varies by institution. In this review, we will explore the significance of POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology, discuss credentialing, and compare the specific requirements and challenges currently associated with using POCUS in pediatric anesthesia.

SUMMARY

Point-of-care ultrasound is being utilized by the pediatric anesthesiologist and has the potential to improve patient assessment, procedure guidance, and decision-making. Guidelines increase standardization and quality assurance procedures help maintain high-quality data. Credentialing standards for POCUS in pediatric anesthesiology are essential to ensure that practitioners have the necessary skills and knowledge to use this technology effectively and safely. Currently, there are no national pediatric POCUS guidelines to base credentialing processes on for pediatric anesthesia practices. Further work directed at establishing pediatric-specific curriculum goals and competency standards are needed to train current and future pediatric anesthesia providers and increase overall acceptance of POCUS use.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty Response to Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing Curriculum

OBJECTIVES

As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) continues to evolve in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), new protocols and curricula are being developed to help establish the standards of practice and delineate training requirements. New suggested guidelines continue to improve, but a national standard curriculum for training and credentialing PEM providers is still lacking. To understand the barriers and perception of curriculum implementation for PEM providers, we created an ultrasound program at our institution and observed attitudes and response to training.

METHODS

Fourteen PEM-fellowship-trained faculty with limited to no previous experience with POCUS underwent training within a 12-month time frame using a modified practice-based training that included didactics, knowledge assessment, and hands-on practice. As part of the curriculum, the faculty completed a 3-phase survey before, after, and 6 months after completion of the curriculum.

RESULTS

There was a 100%, 78.6%, and 71.4% response rate for the presurvey, postsurvey, and 6 months postsurvey, respectively. Lack of confidence with using POCUS went from 100% on the presurvey to 57% on the postsurvey and down to 30% on the 6th month postsurvey. All other barriers also decreased from precurriculum to postcurriculum, except for length of time to perform POCUS. Participants rated the curriculum highly, with a mean Likert score and standard error of the mean at 3.9 ± 0.73, respectively. The average rating for whether POCUS changed clinical practice was low (2.6 ± 1.34).

CONCLUSION

These results show that a simplified structured curriculum can improve perception of POCUS and decrease barriers to usage while helping to understand obstacles for implementation of POCUS among PEM-fellowship-trained faculty.