1
|
Desmeules F, Roy JS, Lafrance S, Charron M, Dubé MO, Dupuis F, Beneciuk JM, Grimes J, Kim HM, Lamontagne M, McCreesh K, Shanley E, Vukobrat T, Michener LA. Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Diagnosis, Nonsurgical Medical Care, and Rehabilitation: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025; 55:235-274. [PMID: 40165544 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
This evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to guide clinicians with recommendations covering the assessment, treatment, and prognosis of adults with shoulder pain with suspected rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, the nonsurgical medical care and rehabilitation of adults with RC tendinopathy, as well as the return to function and sport for elite and recreational athletes. This CPG includes recommendations for managing RC tendinopathy with or without calcifications and partial-thickness RC tears. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):235-274. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13182.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Hu M, Wei J, Su C, Guo C, Xiang S, Xu H. Ultrasound- Versus Landmark-Guided Corticosteroid Injections in Patients With Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND : JCU 2025; 53:525-534. [PMID: 39441207 DOI: 10.1002/jcu.23871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 10/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of ultrasound-guided (USG) and landmark-guided (LMG) injections of corticosteroids into the shoulder joint cavity of patients with shoulder pain. The PubMed database was searched for articles (January 1, 2004-December 31, 2023) comparing USG and LMG injections of corticosteroids for the treatment of adult shoulder pain. Two authors independently performed data extraction and appraisal. The outcome measures collected were visual analogue scale (VAS) score and VAS score change at 1 and 6 weeks postinjection and range of motion (ROM) at 6 weeks postinjection. Thirteen studies including 656 patients were reviewed (USG and LMG groups, 328 patients each). The VAS score at 1 week postinjection and the ROM in abduction at 6 weeks postinjection were statistically different, but there were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes. This meta-analysis indicated that USG corticosteroid injection may have a better effect than LMG corticosteroid injection for early-stage shoulder pain and abduction in the mid- to long-term, but does not affect later shoulder pain or other ROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Zhang
- Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Mingwei Hu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jitong Wei
- Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunyang Su
- Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Cuicui Guo
- Department of Sports Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuai Xiang
- Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Joint Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen PC, Lin TY, Wu WT, Özçakar L, Chang KV. Comparison of ultrasound- vs. landmark-guided injections for musculoskeletal pain: an umbrella review. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56:jrm40679. [PMID: 39185547 PMCID: PMC11367678 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.40769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This umbrella review synthesizes systematic reviews and meta-analyses to reach a conclusion concerning the overall effectiveness of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided injections for treating musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN Umbrella review. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses from inception to March 2024. Critical appraisal, data extraction, and synthesis were performed in accordance with the criteria for conducting an umbrella review. RESULTS Seventeen articles, comprising 4 systematic reviews and 13 meta-analyses, were included. Using the AMSTAR2 instrument for quality assessment, 3 articles were rated as high quality, 1 as moderate, 7 as low, and 6 as critically low. Generally, ultrasound-guided injections were found to be more accurate than landmark-guided injections, particularly in the shoulder joint, though the results for pain relief and functional outcomes varied. Ultrasound guidance was notably effective for injections into the bicipital groove, wrist, hip, and knee - yielding greater accuracy and improved pain management. Both ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided techniques showed low incidence of adverse effects. CONCLUSION This umbrella review offers an in-depth analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided injections across a range of musculoskeletal sites/conditions. The findings suggest that ultrasound-guided is a reliable method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Chieh Shen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Inc., Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan City, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yu Lin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Inc., Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ting Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Levent Özçakar
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ke-Vin Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan; Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wang-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De la Corte-Rodriguez H, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Alvarez-Roman MT, Gomez-Cardero P, Jimenez-Yuste V. Ultrasound-guided joint procedures in hemophilia: technique, indications and tips. Expert Rev Hematol 2024; 17:419-430. [PMID: 39008070 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2024.2380477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The therapeutic approach to pain in hemophilia should be multimodal. Intra-articular injections are a good option when joint lesions do not respond to hematological treatment or rehabilitation and orthopedic surgery is not yet indicated. Performing these procedures under ultrasound guidance has been shown to improve their accuracy and efficacy. AREAS COVERED This article provides a practical overview of the most frequently employed ultrasound-guided intra-articular procedures on the joints of people with hemophilia. The article describes the key elements for performing the technique on the elbow, knee and ankle as the most affected joints. The particularities of the most frequent indications, arthrocentesis, synoviorthesis and analgesic injections with various products are detailed. EXPERT OPINION Current hematological treatments have made it possible to incorporate new therapeutic tools for pain relief for people with hemophilia, including ultrasound-guided joint procedures, which offer excellent results.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pretorius J, Mirdad R, Nemat N, Ghobrial BZ, Murphy C. The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections compared to corticosteroids and physiotherapy in adhesive capsulitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop 2024; 47:35-44. [PMID: 38022840 PMCID: PMC10679531 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Adhesive Capsulitis is a common condition of the shoulder with significant morbidity and protracted disease. It is usually characterized by sudden onset with progressive symptoms of pain and loss of function. This systematic review compares platelet rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections with corticosteroids (CS) injections and physiotherapy. Material and methods A literature search was performed using online databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Medline and CINAHL) including all the studies performed on humans through April 2023. Prospective comparative studies were included in this review of patients with adhesive capsulitis assessing the use of PRP injections versus corticosteroid injections or physiotherapy. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence interval in VAS/DASH/SPADI and ROM scores was calculated using a random effects model, comparing PRP to corticosteroids injections and physiotherapy across studies. Results A total of 11 studies and 971 patients, with a mean age of 52.1, were included in this analysis with 7 being randomised trials and four cohort studies. The control group was corticosteroid injections in 8 studies and physiotherapy in the other three studies. Overall PRP lead to a statistically significant improved outcome at 3 and 6 months follow up for all outcome parameters. The outcome measures at three months includes VAS 0.73 (0.31, 1.16) SMD, DASH 0.66 (0.36, 0.96) SMD, SPADI 1.50 (0.43, 2.57) SMD, ER 1.47 (0.27, 2.66) SMD and Abduction 1.10 (0.21, 1.98) SMD. Six months assessment similarly favoured PRP with VAS 3.17 (1.26, 5.08) SMD and DASH 2.10 (1.66, 2.55) SMD scores. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis demonstrated that PRP was favourable to corticosteroids as control with significant improvement in pain (VAS) at 3 months 0.65 (0.29, 1.00) and 6 months 3.17 (1.26, 5.08) SMD. Conclusion This review demonstrated that intra-articular PRP injections for adhesive capsulitis produces favourable outcomes when compared to corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy. PRP produces improved pain and functional scores as well as range of motion, which is statistically significant from 3 to 6 months post intervention. PRP seems to be a safe and effective alternative non-invasive treatment modality for patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Pretorius
- University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, County Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| | - Rayyan Mirdad
- University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, County Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| | - Nouman Nemat
- Waterford University Hospital, Dunmore Road, Waterford, X91ER8E, Ireland
| | | | - Colin Murphy
- University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, County Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walter WR, Burke CJ, Adler RS. Tips and tricks in ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures. J Ultrason 2023; 23:e347-e357. [PMID: 38020507 PMCID: PMC10668939 DOI: 10.15557/jou.2023.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound visualization affords proceduralists versatile and accurate guidance for a variety of percutaneous, minimally invasive procedures in the musculoskeletal system including joint (intra-articular) injections or aspirations, intra-bursal injections, peritendinous, and perineural injections. A variety of percutaneous procedures are traditionally performed blindly, but may be more easily or more accurately performed with the real-time assistance of ultrasound guidance. Other procedures are only possible utilizing image-guidance, due to the required precision of the injection because of delicate local anatomy or depth of the injection; ultrasound is a safe, portable, and widespread modality that can be used to assist the proceduralist in localizing the needle tip in such cases, to ensure safe and accurate delivery of the medication, most frequently a solution of steroid and anesthetic. This review aims to provide a foundational approach to ultrasound-guided procedures in the musculoskeletal system, offering tips and tricks that can be employed in many different procedures including intra-articular, juxta-articular, and perineural injections for a multitude of clinical scenarios. Technical considerations regarding ultrasound transducer selection, sonographic technique, as well as common indications, contraindications, and complications of these procedures, are presented. Additionally, a variety of pharmacologic considerations for proceduralists contemplating ultrasound-guided injections are discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Signorino JA, Thompson AG, Hando BR, Young JL. Identifying Conservative Interventions for Individuals with Subacromial Pain Syndrome Prior to Undergoing a Subacromial Decompression: A Scoping Review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2023; 18:293-308. [PMID: 37020452 PMCID: PMC10069387 DOI: 10.26603/001c.73312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Subacromial decompression (SAD) surgery remains a common treatment for individuals suffering from subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), despite numerous studies indicating that SAD provides no benefit over conservative care. Surgical protocols typically recommend surgery only after exhausting conservative measures; however, there is no consensus in the published literature detailing what constitutes conservative care "best practice" before undergoing surgery. Purpose To describe conservative interventions received by individuals with SAPS prior to undergoing a SAD. Study Design Scoping review. Methods An electronic search using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus databases was conducted. Peer-reviewed randomized controlled control trials and cohort studies published between January 2000 and February 2022 that included subjects diagnosed with SAPS who progressed to receive a SAD were eligible. Subjects who received previous or concurrent rotator cuff repair with SAPS were excluded. Conservative interventions and treatment details that subjects received prior to undergoing a SAD were extracted. Results Forty-seven studies were included after screening 1,426 studies. Thirty-six studies (76.6%) provided physical therapy (PT) services, and six studies (12.8%) included only a home exercise program. Twelve studies (25.5%) specifically detailed the delivered PT services, and 20 studies (42.6%) stated who provided the PT interventions. Subacromial injections (SI) (55.3%, n=26) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) (31.9%, n=15) were the next most frequently delivered interventions. Thirteen studies (27.7%) included combined PT and SI. The duration of conservative care varied from 1.5 months to 16 months. Conclusion Conservative care that individuals with SAPS receive to prevent advancement to SAD appears inadequate based on the literature. Interventions, such as PT, SI, and NSAIDs, are either underreported or not offered to individuals with SAP prior to advancing to surgery. Many questions regarding optimal conservative management for SAPS persists. Level of Evidence n/a.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kasitinon D, Williams R, Gharib M, Flowers R, Raiser S, Jain NB. What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1961-1967. [PMID: 36126120 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Donald Kasitinon
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Reed Williams
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mahmood Gharib
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ryan Flowers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sara Raiser
- Department of Orthopaedics, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nitin B Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|