An evaluation of complications, revisions, and long-term aesthetic outcomes in nonsyndromic metopic craniosynostosis

Comparing effectiveness of conservative policy to craniofacial surgery in children with metopic synostosis: protocol for an observational cohort study on clinical outcomes, psychosocial well-being and costs in a Dutch academic hospital

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, surgical intervention has been the standard treatment for children with metopic synostosis, assuming that it reduces the risk of raised intracranial pressure, thereby preventing vision and cognitive impairment, and also restores the abnormal head shape. However, recent research suggests a sporadic occurrence of raised intracranial pressure in patients with metopic synostosis. In addition, following surgery, an overall tendency to have worse cognitive and behavioral outcomes and more refractive errors compared to healthy peers is observed. Research on conservative (non-surgical) treatment in metopic synostosis is limited and lacks a comparative design. The purpose of this study is to compare the (cost-)effectiveness of conservative and surgical treatment in patients with metopic synostosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is the protocol for an observational cohort study with a duration of 8 years. A total of 450 patients with metopic synostosis will be included. The primary outcome is head growth as a predictor for increased intracranial pressure. Non-inferiority with regard to head growth from 0 to 8 years (yearly difference in SD) is determined using a linear mixed model adjusted for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes include papilledema, orthoptic outcomes; forehead shape; cognitive, behavioural and psychological outcomes; and societal costs. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam (MEC-2022-0142). Written informed consent will be obtained from both parents of each participant. The results will be disseminated by publication in international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06069479.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedures for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: What Do We Know?

Craniosynostosis is a congenital condition characterized by the premature fusion of cranial sutures, disrupting normal skull and potentially brain growth. The current gold standard for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis is open cranial vault remodeling, which was pioneered by surgeons like Tessier and Whitaker in the 1970s. Recent advances have led to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy with helmeting, spring-assisted cranioplasty, and distraction osteogenesis. These methods aim to minimize surgical trauma, reduce blood loss, and shorten recovery times. This review assesses the evidence comparing open and minimally invasive surgeries for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis.

Surgical Complications After Fronto-orbital Advancement for Craniosynostosis: Analysis of a National Database

BACKGROUND

Fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) is the standard surgical intervention for patients with craniosynostosis and associated fronto-orbital dysmorphology. Although previous studies have provided insights into center-specific complications, comprehensive, large-scale analyses remain limited. This study utilizes a national database to address these gaps, offering a large-scale perspective on FOA outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged 0 to 16 years who underwent FOA from 2007 to 2015 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients were divided into early (0-5 y) and late (6-16 y) groups. Complications were identified using a combination of ICD and CPT codes. Intraoperative complications, including hematoma/hemorrhage, cerebrovascular infarction, and cardiac arrest, were defined as those occurring within 48 hours of the procedure. Postoperative complications analyzed at intervals of 0, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days post-operation included cerebrospinal fluid leak, hardware-related complications, hemorrhage, seizure, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and death. Summary statistics were conducted utilizing Bellwether software in PearlDiver.

RESULTS

A total of 2026 patients underwent FOA, with a mean of 1.5 years in the younger cohort (n=1905) and 9.0 years in the older cohort (n=121). Although rare, hemorrhage was the most common intraoperative complication. One-year postoperative complications were predominantly related to wound dehiscence and surgical site infection in the younger (5.10%) and older (14.1%) cohorts. The 1-year reoperation rate was 7.2% for the younger cohort and 19.0% for the older cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

FOA is a safe operation with an overall low complication rate. However, older patients demonstrate a higher rate of reoperations, emphasizing the need to identify the optimal timing for FOA in patients with craniosynostosis.

A coddling of the sagittal suture: inequality in spring-assisted expansion

PURPOSE

We examined differences in long-term morphometric outcomes of spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) for various forms of isolated nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of children who underwent SMC from 2011 to 2020 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Cephalic indices (CI), Whitaker grades, parietal bone thickness, and degree of suture fusion were assessed. Frontal bossing and vertex-nasion-opisthocranion (VNO) angles were compared to a normal control group.

RESULTS

Fifty-four subjects underwent surgery at age 3.6 ± 1.0 months with follow-up of 6.3 ± 1.8 years. Mean CI was 75.2 ± 4.1 at 5.9 ± 2.0 years postoperatively. Mean CI were 75.8 ± 4.1 (n = 32), 76.4 ± 4.0 (n = 22), and 77.1 ± 4.8 (n = 11) at 5, 7, and 9+ years postoperatively, respectively. Three (5.6%) required reoperation for persistent scaphocephalic cranial deformity. Fifty-one (94.4%) were Whitaker Grade I. On physical examination, 12 (22.2%) demonstrated craniofacial abnormalities. At long-term follow-up, there were no differences in frontal bossing angle (102.7 ± 5.2 degrees versus 100.7 ± 5.6 degrees, p = .052) and VNO angle (44.9 ± 3.3 degrees versus 43.9 ± 2.2 degrees, p = .063) between study and control groups. Younger age at surgery predicted a lower Whitaker grade, more normalized VNO angle, and greater change in CI during active expansion. Increased percentage fused of the posterior sagittal suture predicted a higher Whitaker grade, while decreased anterior fusion was associated with frontal bossing and temporal hollowing.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, children undergoing spring-mediated cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis demonstrated maintenance of CI, favorable cosmetic outcomes, and a low reoperation rate at mid-term follow-up. Early intervention is associated with improved aesthetic outcomes, and regional fusion patterns may influence long-term craniofacial dysmorphology.

Comparative Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes After Cranial Vault Remodeling and Strip Craniectomy With the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module

BACKGROUND

The debate continues among craniofacial surgeons regarding the effectiveness of strip craniectomy (SC) compared with cranial vault remodeling (CVR) in achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with single-suture craniosynostosis. This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between SC and CVR procedures at a single institution using the validated FACE-Q Craniofacial module.

METHODS

Patients older than or equal to 8 years of age and parents of patients younger than 8 years of age who underwent SC or CVR for single-suture craniosynostosis were eligible. Patients with <2 years of follow-up, lambdoid synostosis, and syndromes were excluded. Primary endpoints were PROs as measured by the FACE-Q, with higher scores indicating increased health-related quality of life. Linear regression was used to control for covariates.

RESULTS

Sixty-two participants completed the module (response rate 33.3%). SC was performed in 29 patients (46.8%), and CVR in 33 patients (53.2%). On unadjusted bivariate analysis, SC patients had higher eye (P=0.03) and forehead (P=0.05) scores. On regression analysis, controlling for sex, race, craniosynostosis type, and follow-up, there were no significant differences between operation types in any domain. Metopic and sagittal synostosis were associated with higher Eye (metopic: 17.61, P=0.049; sagittal: 41.44, P<0.001) and Head scores (metopic: 48.12, P=0.001; sagittal: 49.35, P<0.001), and sagittal synostosis was associated with higher Face (38.16, P<0.001), Forehead (55.93, P<0.001), and Nose scores (19.28, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

From patients' and parents' perspectives at a single institution, SC and CVR were equivalent regarding aesthetics and health-related quality of life.

The Top 100 Most-Cited Publications in Clinical Craniofacial Research

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis is a birth defect defined as premature closure of sutures leading to possible neurological deficits and cosmetic deformities. Most of the current literature to date focuses on craniosynostosis etiology by analyzing genetics. This paper is a bibliometric analysis of the most influential works related to the clinical management of craniosynostosis to help guide clinicians in their decision-making.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clarivate Web of Science database was used to identify the top 100 most-cited articles addressing the clinical management of craniosynostosis. A bibliometric review was performed to analyze publication metrics and track research trends.

RESULTS

The 100 most-cited publications pertaining to craniosynostosis management were cited a cumulative 12,779 times. The highest cited article was Shillito and colleagues' "Craniosynostosis: A Review Of 519 Surgical Patients" with 352 citations. The oldest clinical craniosynostosis article dates back to 1948, and the most recent was published in 2016. The year with the most clinical-focused publications was 2011. The most prolific author was Renier, D. The United States produced 56 of the 100 articles. Most articles (n=52) were level 3 evidence.

DISCUSSION

This bibliometric evaluation of craniosynostosis provides insight into the most impactful literature on this topic. The highest cited articles retrospectively analyze large sample sizes, outline proper evaluation, discuss intervention timelines, and highlight specific treatment plans for this birth defect. By filtering through existing literature, this analysis can guide clinicians on the management of craniosynostosis to maximize patient outcomes.

Validating the Supraorbital Notch-Nasion-Supraorbital Notch Angle as a Marker for Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity

OBJECTIVE

Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) can be difficult to differentiate from metopic ridge (MR) or normal frontal morphology. This study assess whether the supraorbital notch-nasion-supraorbital notch (SNS) angle can help identify MCS.

METHODS

Records of 212 patients with preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were examined. The SNS angles, surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings, and CranioRate metopic severity scores (MSSs) were compared with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with Youden J-statistic and cross-validation of regression models assessed the ability of these measures to predict surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were included, consisting of 78 MCS, 37 MR, and 97 controls. Both the mean SNS angle (MCS: 111.7 ± 10.7 degrees, MR: 126.0 ± 8.2 degrees, controls: 130.7 ± 8.8 degrees P < 0.001) and MSS (MCS: 5.9 ± 2.0, MR: 1.4 ± 1.9, controls: 0.2 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) were different among the cohorts. The mean SNS angle (111.5 ± 10.7 versus 129.1 ± 8.8, P < 0.001) was lower in those who had surgery and CranioRate score (5.9 ± 2.1 versus 0.8 ± 2.2, P < 0.001) was higher in those who underwent surgery. SNS angles were positively correlated with surgeon craniofacial dysmorphology rankings ( r = 0.41, P < 0.05) and CranioRate MSS ( r = 0.54, P < 0.05). The ROC curve requiring high sensitivity revealed an SNS angle of 124.8 degrees predicted surgery with a sensitivity of 88.7% and a specificity of 71.3%. A ROC curve using the CranioRate MCC values ≥3.19 predicted surgery with 88.7% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Orbital dysmorphology in patients with MCS is well captured by the supraorbital-nasion angle. Both the SNS angle and CranioRate MSS scores accurately predict surgical intervention.

Surgical Treatment of Trigonocephaly, Simplified Technique for Moderate Cases

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of trigonocephaly has increased worldwide over the past 2 decades. Early identification and appropriate treatment are critical. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and the effect of metopic suture excision, perisutural frontal bone shave, and bilateral pericranial flap method on the shape of the forehead after surgical correction in infants with moderate trigonocephaly.

METHODS

The present study was performed as a cross-sectional study on 40 infants of 3 to 12 months old with trigonocephalus who underwent metopic suture excision and pericardial flap surgery in Mofid Pediatric Hospital from 2016 to 2022. The definitive diagnosis of patients' trigonocephaly was made based on clinical signs and computed tomography scan findings by a plastic surgeon.

RESULTS

Overall in 40 patients operated by this technique, 23 (57.5%) of cases were males, and 17 (42.5%) were females. The mean age of patients was 7.86 ± 2.22 months. Hospital stay was 2 to 4 days (mean: 3 d), intensive care unit admission was in 33 cases for 24 hours, and no intensive care unit admission for 7 cases. Blood was transfused during surgery for 25 patients, and 15 patients did not require blood transfusion use. Results were evaluated in 6 to 12 months after surgery by 3 independent plastic surgeons, with pre and postoperative photos. Satisfaction with the results of forehead shape was excellent for 60% of patients, good for 37.5%, and moderate for 2.5%. Only one female patient had a recurrence after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the pericranial flap method after full metopic suture excision and frontal shave was very effective in the treatment of infants with moderate trigonocephaly.

Patient-Specific Implants and Fat Grafting for Contour Deformities Post Craniosynostosis Reconstruction: A Therapeutic Approach

BACKGROUND

Contour deformities after fronto-orbital advancement for craniosynostosis reconstruction are commonly encountered. There is a paucity of literature describing secondary procedures to correct such deformities with reported outcomes. An approach to defect analysis and procedure selection is lacking. The authors present our experience utilizing fat grafting (FG) and patient-specific implant (PSI) reconstruction as management strategies for this population.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent secondary onlay PSI or FG for contour deformities after primary craniosynostosis reconstruction was carried out. Patient demographics, defect analysis, surgical approach, postoperative complications, and esthetic outcomes were recorded. Data were pooled across the entire cohort and presented in a descriptive manner.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (36% syndromic and 64% isolated) were identified that either underwent PSI (n = 7) with a mean follow-up of 56.3 weeks, FG (n = 5) with a mean follow-up of 36 weeks or a combination of both (n = 2) for deformities postcraniosynostis surgery. Supraorbital retrusion and bitemporal hollowing were the most common deformities. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients achieved Whitaker class I esthetic outcomes and there were no additional revisions during the defined study period. The presence of a significant structural component or large (>5 mm) depression typically necessitated a PSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Contour deformities after fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction can be successfully managed using FG and PSI either as a combination procedure or in isolation. The authors have proposed anatomical criteria based on our experience to help guide procedure selection. Future prospective studies would be beneficial in providing more objective assessment criteria.

A Three-Dimensional-Based Morphometric Analysis of a Standardized Overcorrection Technique for Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Metopic Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

The concept of "overcorrection" for trigonocephaly has been reported to achieve both anterior cranial fossa expansion and normalization of craniofacial form. The purpose of this study is to describe in detail a standardized technique to fronto-orbital advancement utilizing the concept of "overcorrection" and objectively evaluate intermediate results.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with isolated metopic synostosis who underwent surgery via the proposed surgical technique and age and sex-matched unaffected controls. Craniofacial morphometric analysis was performed on pre-, immediate post-, and intermediate postoperative (>2 years) three-dimensional (3D)-rendered computed tomographic (CT) scans and photographs. Key CT-based measurements included interzygomaticofrontal suture distance (IZFS), endocranial bifrontal angle (ECA), and temporal expansion. 3D photogrammetry was performed using established measurements and associated Z-scores converted. A Paired t-test and analysis of variance were performed when appropriate.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included. A comparison of pre- and immediate postoperative CT scans demonstrated statistically significant increases in all measurements. Subset analysis of 12 patients with intermediate follow-up (age: 39.6 ± 3.6 months) demonstrated significant differences from preoperative values except for IZFS, which decreased from immediate postoperative values and was smaller than age- and sex-matched controls. 3D photogrammetry demonstrated a mean Z-score above the norm for frontal breath. 3D photogrammetry is also positively correlated with CT-based measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This standardized "overcorrection" approach for trigonocephaly can provide the appropriate changes to maintain a normal ECA despite a reduction in bifrontal width over time. 3D photogrammetry positively correlated with CT-based measurements and may provide useful information when following patients clinically. Long-term follow-up assessment to determine the necessary degree of overcorrection at skeletal mature is needed.

Which centers should be authorized to treat craniosynostosis? A plea for quality and not for quantity

BACKGROUND

In centers for craniosynostosis surgery, the volume of activity does not necessarily reflect the quality of the treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyze a retrospective series of patients over a period of 6 years in a low-volume craniosynostosis surgery center, and to study indicators that reflect the quality of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis included all patients who underwent a craniofacial surgery for all forms of craniosynostosis during the period 2012-2017 (annual follow-up for 4 years). Data on the type of synostosis, sex, age, weight, type of surgery, duration of surgery, blood transfusion, postinterventional care, and total length of hospital stay were collected. Medical and surgical complications were recorded using the Leeds classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 patients (33 male; 23 cases of scaphocephaly, 13 cases of trigonocephaly, 4 cases of coronal plagiocephaly, 1 case of lambdoid plagiocephaly, and 1 case of brachycephaly) underwent craniofacial surgery with a median age of 7.4 months [4.8; 10.4] and a mean weight of 8.40 ± 1.92 kg at surgery. The median hospital stay was 7 days [6;7] with 1 day in the postinterventional care unit for 83% of patients. The global complication rate was 12% (95% CI: 4%-26%) with three minor cutaneous and two major (cardiovascular and septic) complications.

CONCLUSION

Complication rates reflect the quality of care in a center that treats craniosynostosis much more than do the number of procedures, mean hospital stay, and blood transfusion rates. It is essential to define new indicators capable of measuring the quality of life linked to surgical procedures and of using them to assess the competence of a center.

Quantifying the Severity of Metopic Craniosynostosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Quantifying the severity of head shape deformity and establishing a threshold for operative intervention remains challenging in patients with metopic craniosynostosis (MCS). This study combines three-dimensional skull shape analysis with an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm to generate a quantitative shape severity score (cranial morphology deviation) and provide an operative threshold score.

METHODS

Head computed tomography scans from subjects with MCS and normal controls (5 to 15 months of age) were used for objective three-dimensional shape analysis using ShapeWorks software and in a survey for craniofacial surgeons to rate head-shape deformity and report whether they would offer surgical correction based on head shape alone. An unsupervised machine-learning algorithm was developed to quantify the degree of shape abnormality of MCS skulls compared to controls.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four computed tomography scans were used to develop the model; 50 (24% MCS, 76% controls) were rated by 36 craniofacial surgeons, with an average of 20.8 ratings per skull. The interrater reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.988). The algorithm performed accurately and correlates closely with the surgeons assigned severity ratings (Spearman correlation coefficient, r = 0.817). The median cranial morphology deviation for affected skulls was 155.0 (interquartile range, 136.4 to 194.6; maximum, 231.3). Skulls with ratings of 150.2 or higher were very likely to be offered surgery by the experts in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a novel metric to quantify the head shape deformity associated with MCS and contextualizes the results using clinical assessments of head shapes by craniofacial experts. This metric may be useful in supporting clinical decision making around operative intervention and in describing outcomes and comparing patient population across centers.

Neoforehead Remodelling Techniques for Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodelling in the Oxford Craniofacial Unit: Lateral Remodelling and a Novel Central Self-Stabilizing S-Osteotomy Technique

Fronto-orbital advancement and remodelling (FOAR) has undergone many modifications over the years, aimed at improving outcomes and reducing risks for patients. This work describes 2 techniques for remodelling the neoforehead used by the Oxford Craniofacial Unit since 1995: lateral remodelling and a central S-Osteotomy. Both methods adopt bone from the vertex as a neoforehead, but they differ in their techniques to adapt its shape to that of the newly remodelled orbital bandeau. The novel S-Osteotomy technique can be successfully applied to all FOAR procedures, irrespective of underlying synostosis and calvarial symmetry. It was originally developed for when 2 separate bony panels were required to create a neoforehead in asymmetrical cases, but was adopted for single panel neoforehead designs in metopic synostosis with the idea it may reduce temporal hollowing. An investigation of temporal hollowing in these patients who underwent either of the described methods was undertaken to assess this hypothesis with no statistically significant difference seen ( P =0.1111). Both techniques on average resulted in minimal hollowing that was not felt to require any revision, supporting the belief that temporal hollowing is a multifactorial issue. This work describes 2 successful methods of neoforehead remodelling and introduces the S-Osteotomy technique that can be applied in all FOAR procedures.

Aesthetic results in children with single suture craniosynostosis: proposal for a modified Whitaker classification

OBJECTIVE

Aesthetic assessment after surgery for non-syndromic single suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is crucial. Surgeons' evaluation is generally based on Whitaker classification, while parental impression is generally neglected. The aim of this paper is to compare aesthetic perceptions of parents and surgeons after surgery for SSC, expressed by a 10-item questionnaire that complement Whitaker's classification.

METHODS

The authors submitted a 10-item questionnaire integrating Whitaker's classification in order to evaluate the degree of satisfaction, the detailed aesthetics results and the need for surgical revision, to surgeons and parents of a consecutive series of patients operated for SSC between January 2007 and December 2018. The results were collected blindly.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Scaphocephaly and trigonocephaly were the two most frequent craniosynostosis. Parents and surgeons general aesthetics evaluation and average rating for Whitaker's classification were 1.86 vs 1.67 (p = 0.69) and 1.19 vs 1.1 (p = 0.45) respectively. Parents' evaluation for scar perception and alopecia (p < 0.00001), the presence of bony crest (0.002), bony bump (p < 0.00001), or other bone irregularities (p = 0.02) are significantly worse when compared to surgeons' perception.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents seem to be more sensitive to the detection of some aesthetic anomalies and their opinion should not be neglected. The authors propose a modified Whitaker classification based on their results to better stratify the aesthetic outcome after surgery for SSC.

Machine Learning in Metopic Craniosynostosis: Does Phenotypic Severity Predict Long-Term Esthetic Outcome?

BACKGROUND

There have been few longitudinal studies assessing the effect of preoperative phenotypic severity on long-term esthetic outcomes in metopic craniosynostosis. This study evaluates the relationship between metopic severity and long-term esthetic outcomes using interfrontal angle (IFA) and CranioRate, a novel metopic synostosis severity measure.

METHODS

Patients with metopic craniosynostosis who underwent bifrontal orbital advancement and remodeling between 2012 and 2017 were reviewed. Preoperative computed tomography head scans were analyzed for IFA and CranioRate, a machine learning algorithm which generates quantitative severity ratings including metopic severity score (MSS) and cranial morphology deviation (CMD). Long-term esthetic outcomes were assessed by craniofacial surgeons using blinded 3-rater esthetic grading of clinical photos. Raters assessed Whitaker score and the presence of temporal hollowing, lateral orbital retrusion, frontal bone irregularities and/or "any visible irregularities."

RESULTS

Preoperative scans were performed at a mean age of 7.7±3.4 months, with average MSS of 6/10, CMD of 200/300, and IFA of 116.8±13.8 degrees. Patients underwent bifrontal orbital advancement and remodeling at mean 9.9±3.1 months. The average time from operation to esthetic assessment was 5.4±1.0 years. Pearson correlation revealed a significant negative correlation between MSS and age at computed tomography ( r =-0.451, P =0.004) and IFA ( r =-0.371, P =0.034) and between IFA and age at surgery ( r =-0.383, P =0.018). In multinomial logistic regression, preoperative MSS was the only independent predictor of visible irregularities (odds ratio=2.18, B =0.780, P =0.024) and preoperative IFA alone significantly predicted Whitaker score, with more acute IFA predicting worse Whitaker score (odds ratio=0.928, B =-0.074, P =0.928).

CONCLUSIONS

More severe preoperative phenotypes of metopic craniosynostosis were associated with worse esthetic dysmorphology. Objective measures of preoperative metopic severity predicted long-term esthetic outcomes.

Impact of age at endoscopic metopic synostosis repair on anthropometric outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy for metopic craniosynostosis relies on rapid growth and postoperative helmeting for correction. Endoscopic repair is generally performed before patients reach 4 months of age, and outcomes in older patients have yet to be quantified. Here, the authors examined a cohort of patients treated with endoscopic repair before or after 4 months of age to determine aesthetic outcomes of delayed repairs.

METHODS

Data from eligible patients were retrospectively assessed and aggregated in a dedicated metopic synostosis database. Inclusion criteria were radiographically confirmed metopic synostosis and endoscopic treatment. Patients were dichotomized into two groups: those younger than 4 months and those 4 months or older at the time of repair. The frontal width and interfrontal divergence angle (IFDA) were measured on reconstructed CT images. These measurements, alongside operative time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion rates, were compared between groups using the Student t-test or chi-square test.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 28 patients treated before 4 months of age and 8 patients treated at 4-6 months of age. Patient sex and perioperative complications did not differ by age group. Older age at repair was not significantly associated with 1-year postoperative IFDA (140° ± 4.2° vs 142° ± 5.0°, p = 0.28) or frontal width (84 ± 5.2 vs 83 ± 4.4 mm, p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year postoperative IFDA and frontal width do not differ significantly between patients treated before and after 4 months of age. Further study with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm the longevity of these results at skeletal maturity.

Relating Metopic Craniosynostosis Severity to Intracranial Pressure

PURPOSE

A subset of patients with metopic craniosynostosis are noted to have elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it is not known if the propensity for elevated ICP is influenced by the severity of metopic cranial dysmorphology.

METHODS

Children with nonsyndromic single-suture metopic synostosis were prospectively enrolled and underwent optical coherence tomography to measure optic nerve head morphology. Preoperative head computed tomography scans were assessed for endocranial bifrontal angle as well as scaled metopic synostosis severity score (MSS) and cranial morphology deviation score determined by CranioRate, an automated severity classifier.

RESULTS

Forty-seven subjects were enrolled between 2014 and 2019, at an average age of 8.5 months at preoperative computed tomography and 11.8 months at index procedure. Fourteen patients (29.7%) had elevated optical coherence tomography parameters suggestive of elevated ICP at the time of surgery. Ten patients (21.3%) had been diagnosed with developmental delay, eight of whom demonstrated elevated ICP. There were no significant associations between measures of metopic severity and ICP. Metopic synostosis severity score and endocranial bifrontal angle were inversely correlated, as expected (r=-0.545, P<0.001). A negative correlation was noted between MSS and formally diagnosed developmental delay (r=-0.387, P=0.008). Likewise, negative correlations between age at procedure and both MSS and cranial morphology deviation was observed (r=-0.573, P<0.001 and r=-0.312, P=0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased metopic severity was not associated with elevated ICP at the time of surgery. Patients who underwent later surgical correction showed milder phenotypic dysmorphology with an increased incidence of developmental delay.

Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic and Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostoses

Fronto-orbital advancement remains a powerful technique for the correction of anterior cranial vault differences related to metopic (trigonocephaly) or unilateral coronal (anterior plagiocephaly) craniosynostoses. Traditional fronto-orbital advancement requires access to the forehead and superior 2/3 of the orbit via a coronal incision. The frontal bone and orbital segment (bandeau) are then separated from the skull and reshaped. In patients with metopic craniosynostosis, the bandeau and frontal bone will need to be advanced and widened. In patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis, the bandeau will need to be "untwisted" to address the supraorbital retrusion on the affected side, the affected orbit will need to be shortened and widened, and the frontal bone flap will need to be proportionately advanced on the affected side. Overcorrection of the affected dimension should be undertaken to account for growth and relapse.

Management of Unicoronal and Metopic Synostoses: Minimally Invasive Approaches

Early endoscopic-assisted correction of unicoronal and metopic synostosis is an excellent, safe, cost-effective, and highly effective option for affected patients. Although open calvarial remodeling has a place in the armamentarium of the craniofacial team, the skull base changes seen in endoscopic-assisted techniques are unparalleled. The procedures are associated with low morbidity and no mortality. There is minimal blood loss, decreased operating time, significantly reduced blood transfusion rates, decreased hospitalization length, decreased cost, and less pain and swelling. Early diagnosis and referral for surgical evaluation are critical to obtaining these results.

Late Deformity Following Fronto-Orbital Reconstructive Surgery for Metopic Synostosis: The Role of Temporalis Muscle

ABSTRACT

Theories for late-developing deformity (LDD) following fronto-orbital reconstructive surgery (FOR) for metopic synostosis (MS) must explain both its delayed onset and its physical characteristics. This study examined whether FOR-related interference with the normal childhood expansion of temporalis is responsible for its soft tissue component.Three-dimensional reformats of preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans of MS patients were reviewed. Measurements of vertical and horizontal reach of temporalis against those of the underlying skull (to allow for normal skull growth) were compared with normal subjects. The thickness of temporalis and the development of the temporal crests were also assessed.Mean age at FOR was 17.1 months; interval between surgery and first report of LDD 4.7 years; mean age at computed tomography scan for post-FOR LDD patients 8.8 years. There was a significant difference between vertical and horizontal reach of temporalis in pre-FOR MS patients compared to normal subjects (P < 0.0017 and P < 0.05, respectively). The vertical age-related reach of temporalis in post-FOR patients after allowing for underlying skull growth was significantly reduced (P = 0.0045) compared to normal subjects but not its horizontal reach (P = 0.25). Temporal crests in LDD patients were absent or aberrantly formed while muscle thickness was similar to normal subjects at the 2 levels measured.This study supports the theory that failure of the normal childhood expansion of temporalis is responsible for the soft tissue element of LDD, accounting for both its delayed onset and physical characteristics. Aberrant temporal crest development suggests FOR-related damage as the probable cause.

Do standard surgical techniques lead to satisfying aesthetic results in nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical correction of synostotic cranial sutures is typically performed early in an affected child's life. Depending on the severity of the cranial synostoses, different aspects of the surgical treatment may have varying degrees of importance. In this sense, the aesthetic appearance in children with normal neurological development in single-suture synostosis plays an important role in self-perception and social acceptance for both the patients themselves and their caregivers. Therefore, in this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the aesthetic outcome after surgical correction in a cohort of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal suture synostosis.

METHODS

Between December 2002 and December 2019, a total of 99 patients underwent surgical correction of a synostotic sagittal suture at the Medical University of Vienna. Depending on their age, patients underwent either an extended midline strip craniectomy (EMSC) (< 4 months) or a modified pi procedure (MPP) (≥ 4 months). After the surgical procedure, the outcome was evaluated by the treating neurosurgeon at 1- and 12-month follow-up visits, and after approximately 5 years, before the patient entered elementary school. In addition to that, the patients' caregivers were asked to evaluate the aesthetic outcome of the surgical procedure after 12 months. These results were then compared to evaluate potential differences in the perception of the surgical outcome.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the majority of the included patients were evaluated as having a good aesthetic outcome by the treating neurosurgeon (97%) and by their caregivers (89%). These differences did not show statistical significance (p = 0.11). Similarly, no differences in the aesthetic outcome depending on the surgical procedure performed could be found (p = 0.55). At the last follow-up visit, before entering elementary school, all available patients had an excellent or good surgical outcome. Moreover, the majority of caregivers (73%) reported that their child had a normal head shape appearance after surgical correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have suggested that surgical correction of sagittal suture synostosis by simple operative techniques leads to a good aesthetic outcome and a normal head shape appearance in the majority of patients. An analysis of the evaluation of the surgical outcome by either the treating neurosurgeon or the patient caregivers showed comparable results and, thus, early intervention with simple surgical techniques can be recommended.

Single Segment Neo-Bandeau Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Children With Craniosynostosis: Technique Adaptation and Craniometric Analysis

ABSTRACT

Fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) of the anterior skull and orbital bandeau is standard of care for craniosynostosis with anterior morphology. Fronto-orbital retrusion, temporal hollowing, and bony contour irregularities are commonly seen in long-term follow-up. In this study, we report several technical adaptations of a new FOA technique described in Fearon et al that help facilitate adaptation of the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA technique in preparation of use in younger patients, and perform a craniometric analysis of the technique. Five consecutive patients who underwent the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA in 2020 with available pre- and post-operative three-dimensional head computed tomography scans were studied. Using Materialise Mimics (Materialise, Ghent, Belgium), cranial length, cranial height, cranial widths, and intracranial volume were measured. Two (40%) patients were male and all were non-Hispanic White with a median age at surgery of 18.6 months (interquartile range 10.4-45.7). Three patients (60%) had bicoronal or other multi-suture craniosynostosis, and 1 each had metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis. Intraoperatively measured intracranial pressure decreased from 17.8 mmHg (R 13.0-20.0) before craniectomy to 4.8 mmHg (R 2.0-11.0; P = 0.038) after craniectomy. Anterior cranial width increased postoperatively (mean 92.6 mm; R 74.9-111.5 versus 117.6 mm; R 109.8-135.2, P = 0.005). Intracranial volume increased from preoperative (mean 1211 cm3; R 782-1949 cm3) to postoperative (1387 cm3; R 1022-2108 cm3; P = 0.009). The authors find in this small sample that a single-segment neo-bandeau FOA demonstrates volumetric expansion similar to conventional FOA techniques and is feasible in infants under 1 year of age.

Part 1: Surgical Correction in 231 Trigonocephaly Patients - The Alder Hey Experience

ABSTRACT

Isolated metopic synostosis presents with a range of severity, from a palpable ridge as the sole presenting feature to a constellation of features resulting in trigonocephaly. At our unit, patients on the moderate to severe end of the phenotypic spectrum of trigonocephaly are offered fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The authors present our series of trigonocephaly patients who have undergone surgical correction. From January 2000 to January 2020, the authors operated on 231 patients with trigonocephaly. The average age at surgery was 18 months, with an average follow-up of 77.4 months. Seventy-nine percent of patients had no comorbidity. Ten percent of patients sustained a dural tear with no long-term consequences. The total early complication rate was 12.1%. The most common early complications were wound infection and wound dehiscence at 7.4% and 3.9% respectively. The total reoperation rate was 6.5%. The introduction of infection prevention and control measures over the 2 decades at our unit reduced the reoperation rate to 1.1%. The most common late complication was temporal recession in 20.8% of patients, none of whom required aesthetic correction. The recurrence rate of a metopic ridge was 2.3% with no patients requiring further surgery. None of our patients required calvarial remodeling for raised intracranial pressure after the primary fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. There were no life-threatening complications or mortalities in our cohort. The authors present recommendations which include an infection control care bundle, cessation of surgical drains, and practice adjustments to reduce risks of infection and risk of requiring further calvarial remodelling for raised intracranial pressure.

Quantifying Orthotic Correction of Trigonocephaly Using Optical Surface Scanning

ABSTRACT

Numerous publications describe techniques to measure trigonocephaly caused by metopic synostosis, but they are potentially hazardous for use in acquiring longitudinal data. Optical surface scanning technology can safely yield craniometrics but has not established a practical means for measuring objective morphological changes to trigonocephaly during the practical time constraints of a clinical visit. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate a method for safely and repeatedly measuring frontal angle (FA) using technology available at multiple centers providing treatment with cranial remolding orthoses.Optical scans of infants who underwent endoscopic-assisted minimally-invasive craniectomy for repair of metopic synostosis with cranial remolding were retrospectively analyzed. A novel FA measurement technique "FA30" was developed based on repeatable, geometrically-related surface landmarks approximating the glabella and frontotemporali. Results were compared to a control group and categories of non-synostotic deformity. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for pre- and post-treatment scan measurements among separate clinicians.All trigonocephalic subjects (n = 5) had initial FA30 significantly lower than the control group and other cohorts (P < 0.001). During the course of orthotic cranial remolding following surgical release mean FA30 increased from 121.5° to 138.5° (P < 0.001), approaching the control group mean of 144.4°. Intraclass coefficient calculation showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.993, 95% confidence interval: 0.957-0.998, P < 0.001), which was supported with Bland-Altman analyses of agreement.Optical surface scanning may provide a safe, accurate, and repeatable means to measure FA. Increase in FA30 demonstrates correction of trigonocephaly. The method presented enables expeditious reporting of treatment progress to the infant's surgeon and parents, and has potential for use in optimizing treatment outcomes at multiple centers.

Three-Dimensional Analysis and Surgical Planning for Open Correction of Trigonocephaly

SUMMARY

Metopic craniosynostosis results in trigonocephaly, characterized by a triangular forehead with metopic ridge, bitemporal pinching, and narrow-set eyes with recessed lateral orbital rims. Surgical management is controversial but may include open expansion and vault remodeling, to enhance neurocognitive and aesthetic outcomes. This article and video vignette depict the diagnosis and treatment of metopic craniosynostosis, demonstrating the senior author's open approach, three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and technical steps.

Photogrammetric evaluation of corrective surgery for trigonocephaly

The aim of this study was to capture preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up head shapes of male trigonocephaly patients who underwent fronto-orbital remodelling (FOR), using three-dimensional (3D) photography. Fifty-seven male infants with metopic synostosis operated on using standardized FOR during a 5-year period were included. All measurements were compared with those of an age-matched healthy control cohort (n = 253 for early postoperative comparison, n = 43 for the 1-year follow-up comparison) to determine the effect of FOR at 14 days and at 1 year post-surgery. Intracranial volume, frontal angle, nasofrontal angle, interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio, and inter-orbital distances were measured 1 day preoperatively, 14 days and 1 year postoperatively. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.1 months. Prior to surgery, boys with metopic synostosis showed a reduced intracranial volume (-7.0%, P < 0.001), frontal angle (-10.2%, P < 0.001), interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio (-4.9%, P < 0.01), and orbital distances (-6.5%, P < 0.001) compared to the reference group, but values did not differ significantly from the specific control group after surgery (all P> 0.05). This was consistent by the time of the follow-up examination. Corrective surgery should therefore aim to achieve volume expansion and correction of the deformity. Furthermore, 3D photogrammetry provides a valuable alternative to computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of metopic synostosis, significantly reducing the amount of radiation exposure to the brain.

Combating Constraints of the Functional Matrix: The Importance of Overcorrection in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

To effectively manipulate the bone, particularly in the growing patient, the craniofacial surgeon must understand the principles related to bone-based reconstruction. A theory of craniofacial growth that is both biologically accurate and clinically relevant is thus needed.

Methods:

A historical review of major findings across various disciplines (including orthopedic surgery, anatomy, embryology, orthodontics, and cell biology) will be covered, as it pertains to the concept of the functional matrix of the craniofacial skeleton.

Results:

The functional matrix dictates the interplay between the soft tissue envelope and bone grafts, thus guiding donor site choice and inset methods. The soft tissue may also warrant the use of bony hypercorrection especially in cranial vault remodeling. Control of both bone and boundaries of the soft tissue functional matrix can be achieved via distraction osteogenesis.

Conclusion:

The soft tissue functional matrix must be accounted for during craniofacial bone grafting, mobilizing osteotomies, and distraction osteogenesis if optimal aesthetic results are to be obtained using the least amount of procedures.

Postoperative helmet therapy following fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis

Out of all the synostotic corrective surgeries, fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling for patients with unilateral coronal synostosis is one of the hardest to maintain symmetric and proportional correction without some amount of relapse. Over the course of 20 years operating on these patients, the senior author has made multiple adjustments to compensate for relapse asymmetry, including overcorrection on the affected side, increased points of fixation, periosteal release, and scalp expansion with galeal scoring to minimize tension of the closure. As a result of these interventions, we have seen improved immediate results following surgery. However, we have continued to note clinically significant relapse postoperatively. As such, we have started to implement postoperative helmet therapy (PHT) to help maintain the surgical correction, improve secondary brachycephaly, and increase overall symmetry. PHT is a reasonable low-risk complement to fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remolding. Clinically, PHT appears to help minimize relapse and improve overall head symmetry. Further investigation and increased patient enrollment are required to determine the true benefits of PHT in this patient population.

Observations on the growth of temporalis muscle: A 3D CT imaging study

This study investigates the hypothesis that there is, during childhood, a disproportionate age-related expansion of the origin of temporalis muscle compared to the growth of the underlying skull. Lateral projections of 50 randomly selected 3D reformatted computerized tomographic (CT) scans (yielding 100 temporalis muscles) of children aged >0.6 to 15 years scanned for conditions that did not affect the shape of their head or face were windowed to provide the optimum delineation of temporalis muscle against the underlying bone. Vertical and anterior-posterior measurements of the muscle made independently by two observers were compared with those of the skull along the same planes. The development of the anterior temporal crest was also assessed. The intraclass correlation coefficient for differences in the measurements made by each observer ranged from good to excellent. The muscle and skull measurements were used to produce a ratio of muscle-to-skull lengths in both vertical and horizontal planes. Analysis of these ratios showed a statistically significant increase in the vertical reach of temporalis with age (Pearson correlation coefficient (R) =0.7826; p < 0.05) compared to the growth of the skull along the planes chosen for the study-but less so for its horizontal reach (R = 0.5073. p < .001). There were no significant differences between right/left or male/female measurements. There was also a substantial level of agreement between both observers in their assessment of the development of the temporal crest. The mean age of children in whom a fully formed temporal crest could be identified (10.6 years) was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than that of the 38 remaining subjects (6.0 years). These results confirm that there is, in response to increased masticatory/dietary demands during childhood, a disproportionate increase in the vertical and (to a lesser extent) horizontal reach of temporalis muscle over its origin from the temporal, frontal, sphenoid, and parietal bones compared the growth of the skull. It is proposed that surgical interference with this normal process is responsible for the soft tissue component of late-developing deformity that can occur following early (at 6-18 months of age) operations for the correction of trigonocephalic head shape associated with metopic synostosis.

Comparison of Head Shape Outcomes in Metopic Synostosis Using Limited Strip Craniectomy and Open Vault Reconstruction Techniques

AIM

Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS), with its trigonocephalic head shape, is often treated with either limited incision strip craniectomy (LISC) followed by helmet orthotic treatment, or open cranial vault reconstruction techniques (OCVR). There is controversy regarding resultant shape outcomes among craniofacial surgeons. Those adverse to LISC claim normal head shape is never attained, while proponents believe there is gradual correction to an equivalent outcome. This study aims to quantitate, over time, the three-dimensional (3D) head shapes in patients who have undergone LISC or OCVR intervention for MCS.

METHODS

Sixty-three 3D images of 26 patients with MCS were analyzed retrospectively. Head shape analyses were performed at: (1) preoperative, (2) 1-month postoperative, (3) 10 to 14 months postoperative (1 year), and (4) 2 years postoperative. Composite 3D head shapes of patients were compared at each time point. Two-dimensional (2D) standardized cross sections of the forehead were also compared.

RESULTS

Composite head shapes for both groups were nested, to allow visual comparison as the child's forehead grows and expands. The difference between LISC and OCVR 2D cross sections was calculated; 108.26 mm preoperatively, 127.18 mm after 1-month postoperative, 51.05 mm after 10 to 14 months postoperative, and 27.03 mm after 2 years postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found excellent head shape outcomes for both the LISC and OCVR techniques at 2 years of age. It also corroborates the slow and progressive improvement in head shape with the LISC technique. This study highlights the advantages of 3D photography for measurement of contour outcomes, utilizing both 2D vector and 3D whole head analytical techniques.

Virtual Planning for Exchange Cranioplasty in Cranial Vault Remodeling

ABSTRACT

The use of virtual surgical planning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing has gained popularity in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis. This study expands the use of virtual surgical planning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing in cranial vault reconstruction by using these methods to reconstruct the anterior vault using a single endocortically-plated unit constructed from the posterior calvarium. This technique was designed to reduce the risk of undesirable contour deformities that can occur when multiple bone grafts are used to reconstruct the anterior vault and fronto-orbital rim. Six patients were included in this study, all of which had nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Excellent aesthetic outcomes were obtained in all patients, without complication. Additionally, the placement of a single reconstructive unit constructed from the posterior calvarium was efficient, aesthetically pleasing, and minimized postoperative contour deformities secondary to bone gaps, resorption, and often palpable resorbable plates.

School-Aged Anthropometric Outcomes After Endoscopic or Open Repair of Metopic Synostosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Metopic craniosynostosis can be treated by fronto-orbital advancement or endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting. Infants younger than 6 months of age are eligible for the endoscopic repair. One-year postoperative anthropometric outcomes have been shown to be equivalent, with significantly less morbidity after endoscopic treatment. The authors hypothesized that both repairs would yield equivalent anthropometric outcomes at 5-years postoperative.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of 31 consecutive nonsyndromic patients with isolated metopic craniosynostosis treated with either endoscopic or open correction. The primary anthropometric outcomes were frontal width, interfrontal divergence angle, the Whitaker classification, and the presence of lateral frontal retrusion. Peri-operative variables included estimated blood loss, rates of blood transfusion, length of stay, and operating time.

RESULTS

There was a significantly lower rate of lateral frontal retrusion in the endoscopic group. No statistically significant differences were found in the other 3 anthropometric outcomes at 5-years postoperative. The endoscopic group was younger at the time of surgery and had improved peri-operative outcomes related to operating time, hospital stay and blood loss. Both groups had low complication and reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of school-aged children with isolated metopic craniosynostosis, patients who underwent endoscopic repair had superior or equivalent outcomes on all 4 primary anthropometric measures compared with those who underwent open repair. Endoscopic repair was associated with significantly faster recovery and decreased morbidity. Endoscopic repair should be considered in patients diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis before 6 months of age.

Endoscopic treatment of combined metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Combined metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis is traditionally treated with open cranial vault remodeling and fronto-orbital advancement, sometimes in multiple operations. Endoscopic treatment of this multisuture synostosis presents a complex challenge for the surgeon and orthotist.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the preoperative and 1-year postoperative CT scans of 3 patients with combined metopic-sagittal synostosis, all of whom were treated with simultaneous endoscope-assisted craniectomy of the metopic and sagittal sutures followed by helmet therapy. Established anthropometric measurements were applied to assess pre- and postoperative morphology, including cranial index and interfrontal divergence angle (IFDA). Patients' measurements were compared to those obtained in 18 normal controls.

RESULTS

Two boys and one girl underwent endoscope-assisted craniectomy at a mean age of 81 days. The mean preoperative cranial index was 0.70 (vs control mean of 0.82, p = 0.009), corrected postoperatively to a mean of 0.82 (vs control mean of 0.80, p = 0.606). The mean preoperative IFDA was 110.4° (vs control mean of 152.6°, p = 0.017), corrected postoperatively to a mean of 139.1° (vs control mean of 140.3°, p = 0.348). The mean blood loss was 100 mL and the mean length of stay was 1.7 days. No patient underwent reoperation. The mean clinical follow-up was 3.4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet therapy is a viable single-stage treatment option for combined metopic-sagittal synostosis, providing correction of the stigmata of trigonoscaphocephaly, with normalization of the cranial index and IFDA.

Long-Term Growth following Trigonocephaly Repairs: Are Overcorrections Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Does bifrontal width change with growth following trigonocephaly corrections? Postoperative long-term growth was assessed, along with the impacts of phenotypic severity, surgical timing, and operative technique, to determine how wide to surgically set bifrontal width.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all trigonocephaly repairs was performed. Exclusion criteria included syndromic conditions, incomplete records, and follow-up under 1 year. Anthropometric measurements taken through completion of growth were evaluated and compared to sex- and age-matched normal standards for Z score conversion.

RESULTS

Of 370 consecutive patients undergoing repairs, 95 had sufficient anthropometric data. The mean surgical age was 10.8 months (range, 2 months to 7 years) and mean follow-up was 54.3 months (range, 12 months to 17.8 years). Sequential measurements revealed progressive increases in bifrontal width. However, following conversion to Z scores, the initial overcorrection (mean overcorrection, 8.7 mm; mean Z score, +2.3) steadily diminished to an undercorrection (mean measurement, -5.5 mm; mean Z score, -1.1). Compared to treatment at an older age (10 to 12 months), repairs performed in those younger than 8 months showed worse growth (p = 0.004). Those more severely affected (lowest bifrontal Z scores) had growth similar to that of those more mildly impacted. Only two patients (2.1 percent) underwent secondary procedures for recurrences. No correlation was found between anthropologic measurements and observers' severity assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Subnormal bifrontal growth occurs following trigonocephaly corrections, especially with earlier corrections. Repairs performed at approximately 11 months of age had to be overcorrected by approximately 1.5 cm to produce a normal bifrontal width at maturity.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Orbito-facial dysmorphology in patients with different degrees of trigonocephaly severity: quantitative morpho-volumetric analysis in infants with non-syndromic metopic craniosynostosis

PURPOSE

Craniofacial dysmorphology varies significantly along a wide spectrum of severity in metopic cranial synostosis (MCS). This study aimed to quantify craniofacial changes, in MCS, to investigate their relationships with the severity of trigonocephaly.

METHODS

By combining the metopic ridge and interfrontal angles, we identified three groups of trigonocephaly severity (mild group n.14, moderate group n.19, severe group n.18). We perform a quantitative analysis using high-resolution CT images evaluating (1) cranial fossae dimensions; (2) vault indices and ratios: interparietal/ intercoronal (IPD/ICD), interparietal/intertemporal (IPD/ITD), cephalic index, vertico-longitudinal index; (3) orbito-facial distances (midfacial depth, maxillary height, upper facial index, orbital distances, globe protrusions), maxilla and orbital volumes; (4) supratentorial (ICV) and infratentorial (PCFV) cranial volumes and supratentorial (WBV) and infratentorial (PCFBV) brain volumes.

RESULTS

In all groups, middle skull base lengths and upper midface index were increased. In moderate and severe groups: anterior hemifossa lengths were reduced, IPD/ICD and vertico-longitudinal index were changed; midfacial depth, anterior, mild, and lateral interorbital distances were reduced; globe protrusions were increased. The comparison between moderate and severe groups showed an increase of both globe protrusions and IPD/ICD. Among all groups, ICV and WBV were reduced in the severe group.

CONCLUSION

This morpho-volumetric study provides new insights in understanding the craniofacial changes occurring in infants at different severity of trigonocephaly. The increase of globe protrusions and the reduction of supratentorial volumes found in the severe group reflect the severity of trigonocephaly; these findings might have a clinical and surgical relevance.

Is There an Advantage to Minimizing Surgery in Scaphocephaly? A Study on Extended Strip Craniectomy Versus Extensive Cranial Vault Remodeling

BACKGROUND

Different techniques have been described to correct scaphocephaly. In authors' institution, total cranial vault remodeling (TCVR) was the standard of care. To limit the extent of surgery and the need for transfusion, the technique was minimized to extended strip craniectomy (ESC) without helmet therapy. This retrospective study compares outcome and morbidity between ESC and TCVR.

METHODS

Twenty-seven scaphocephalic patients were included. The ESC was performed in 9 patients between 2012 and 2014, and TCVR in 17 patients between 2008 and 2016. Data on blood loss and transfusion rate, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), head circumference, and cephalic index (CI) were collected retrospectively. A cosmetic outcome score (COS) was developed to rate esthetic outcome since CI is a limited and crude measurement of cosmetic outcome.

RESULTS

The LOS was identical in both groups, but duration of surgery was significantly shorter in ESC (P < 0.0001). Transfusion rate appeared higher in the TCVR group, but differences were not significant (P = 0.11). Cosmetic outcome appeared slightly worse in the ESC group, but results were not significantly different (P = 0.66). There was, however, a significant improvement in postoperative CI in the TCVR group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The only advantage of ESC was the reduced duration of surgery, but this could not prevent the need for transfusion in this group of patients. The improvement of the CI was significantly less pronounced after ESC, but the COS was not significantly worse in the ESC group. The scar and LOS were similar in both groups. Therefore, our findings indicate that minimizing TCVR to ESC without helmet therapy does not provide significant advantages.

In Situ Hinge Technique for the Frontal Bandeau for the Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis Reduces Operative Time

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment of metopic craniosynostosis often involves bitemporal expansion of the anterior cranium. This report compares perioperative variables of a surgical technique in which the fronto-orbital bandeau is bent in situ to traditional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR).

METHOD/DESCRIPTION

Six patients undergoing the hinge technique were compared to the senior author's 6 most recent conventional FOARs. Study and control cohorts were reasonably well matched for age and sex; only those with nonsyndromic, single-suture metopic synostosis were included. Perioperative variables such as OR time, blood loss, hardware costs, length of stay, and perioperative complications were compared between groups using unpaired t tests.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly decreased when the hinge technique was utilized, with a mean operative time of 159 ± 14.0 minutes for hinge patients and 193 ± 33.8 minutes for nonhinge patients (P = 0.049). Hardware was also significantly decreased from an average of 2.2 ± 1.0 plates and 35 ± 13.8 screws in nonhinge patients to 1 plate and 20 screws in each hinge patient (P < 0.02), for an average hardware saving of $2990 per hinge surgery (P = 0.019). Estimated blood loss, length of stay, and perioperative complications were not significantly different between groups. All patients in both groups had Whitaker 1 outcomes in short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The hinge technique for the treatment of metopic synostosis is associated with a statistically significant decrease in operative time, hardware utilization, and hardware cost. Perioperative outcomes were similar between the hinge technique and traditional FOAR in the short term, and additional follow-up is needed to determine whether the 2 have similar long-term outcomes.

Debunking a Surgical Myth: Do Not Touch the Temporalis

BACKGROUND

A longstanding dictum exists to avoid surgical manipulation of the temporalis muscle out of concern for an exceedingly high rate of muscle atrophy and recurrent temporal hollowing. The authors challenge this surgical myth, considering such advice to be erroneous. The authors hypothesize that elevation of the temporalis muscle, if performed using standard muscle flap principles, will demonstrate excellent results.

METHODS

To assess temporalis response to surgical manipulation, the authors reviewed patients who underwent calvarial vault remodeling by the senior author for craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011. Nonsyndromic patients with single-suture synostosis and 5 years of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. The medical record was used to measure rates of reoperation, recurrent temporal hollowing, and persistent temporalis overcorrection.

RESULTS

Of the cohort reviewed, 196 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients (5.1%) exhibited recurrent bitemporal constriction. One patient (0.5%) underwent a revision temporalis turnover flap, and 2 patients (1.0%) underwent soft tissue augmentation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%. Temporalis overcorrection, in an attempt to prophylactically rectify the expected atrophy after temporalis manipulation, persisted in 11 patients (5.6%). Three of these patients required treatment with steroid injections, Botox injections, or operative muscle debulking. The overall reoperation rate for temporalis overcorrection was 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' low reoperation rates for recurrent deformity, in combination with persistent temporalis overcorrection in 5.6% of patients, should dispel the myth that manipulation of the temporalis invariably results in atrophy. The muscle may be surgically manipulated, as long as plastic surgery principles are followed.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis are sometimes touted as equivalent to cranial vault reconstruction. While techniques for sagittal synostosis have been reviewed previously, evidence regarding open and less invasive surgical techniques for metopic, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis has yet to be reviewed.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed using Embase.com and PubMed. Included studies reported short- or long-term outcomes, compared at least 2 standard techniques, discussed single-suture coronal, metopic, or lambdoid craniosynostosis, and enrolled at least 20 study participants. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, and also performed full text review and data extraction. Given heterogeneous outcomes, qualitative synthesis was performed after data extraction.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 2348 articles. Of these, 313 were removed as duplicates, and 1935 were excluded during title/abstract review. After full text review of 100 articles, 19 were selected for data extraction. The heterogeneity of outcomes precluded meta-analysis and required qualitative synthesis. While short-term outcomes indicated decreased morbidity of minimally invasive techniques, only 2 articles presented long-term reoperation rates. One study reported higher reoperation rates in the less invasive technique, and the second reported no reoperations in the median follow-up period of 33 months.

CONCLUSION

Studies comparing long-term outcomes between different surgical techniques for single-suture craniosynostosis remain deficient. The development of standardized outcome measures is essential, and prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy of these procedures.

Endoscopy-assisted early correction of single-suture metopic craniosynostosis: a 19-year experience

In BriefThe long-term results of treating infants with metopic craniosynostosis by using endoscopic, minimally invasive techniques are reported. The impetus arose from the lack of consistent and favorable outcomes associated with calvarial vault remodeling techniques and from the very traumatic and invasive nature of these procedures. The results presented show excellent and consistent long-term outcomes that are superior to traditional methods and are associated with minimal trauma, blood loss, and anesthetic exposure, and with short surgical times.

Subjective Assessment of Head and Facial Appearance in Children with Craniosynostoses after Surgical Treatment

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostoses are congenital defects in the construction of the skull involving premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. Premature fusion of sutures causes characteristic skull deformation(s). This affect the structure and thus the appearance of the entire head and face. The aim of this study was to analyze parents' subjective assessments of head and facial appearance in children with craniosynostoses before and after surgery. Parents also assessed the interpersonal relationship of their children with peers and adults (after surgery).

METHODS

This study was conducted among parents of 230 children treated in Poland, in two multidisciplinary centers. Detailed statistical analysis was conducted among children who had undergone surgery. Independent variables were age (at survey) of the child (three years and less, four years, and five years and more) and type of craniosynostosis (isolated and syndromic). A chi-square independence test was used. Data was collected using surveys.

RESULTS

In the opinion of most parents, the appearance of their child's head and face after surgery did not differ or differed only slightly from that of their peers. The results of subjective assessment of appearance of children's face and head after reconstructive treatment remains comparable in three subgroups of patients according to the age. It seems that specific head shape according to the type of craniosynostosis does not have an impact on relations with peers and adults.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of children with craniosynostoses improves the appearance of their head and face. This improvement seems not to depend on the type of isolated craniosynostosis, and is constant over time.

A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: the nonsagittal single sutures

OBJECTIVE

Despite increasing adoption of endoscopic techniques for repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, the efficacy and safety of the procedure relative to established open approaches are unknown. In this systematic review the authors aimed to directly compare open surgical and endoscope-assisted techniques for the treatment of metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis, with an emphasis on quantitative reported outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to August 2017. The quality of methodology and bias risk were assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, 7 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis of the evidence, of which none were eligible for meta-analysis. These reported on 111 unique patients with metopic, 65 with unilateral coronal, and 12 with lambdoid craniosynostosis. For all suture types, 100 (53%) children underwent endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery and 32 (47%) patients underwent open repair. These studies all suggest that blood loss, transfusion rate, operating time, and length of hospital stay were superior for endoscopically treated children. Although potentially comparable or better cosmetic outcomes are reported, the paucity of evidence and considerable variability in outcomes preclude meaningful conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data comparing open and endoscopic treatments for metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid synostosis suggest a benefit for endoscopic techniques with respect to blood loss, transfusion, length of stay, and operating time. This report highlights shortcomings in evidence and gaps in knowledge regarding endoscopic repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, emphasizing the need for further matched-control studies.

Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis: A 3-D Photogrammetric Analysis of Cranial Vault Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 3-dimensional (3-D) photogrammetry as a tool for assessing the postoperative head shape of patients who had undergone cranial vault remodeling for metopic synostosis.

DESIGN

We prospectively analyzed images of patients with metopic craniosynostosis who had undergone anterior cranial vault remodeling and age-matched controls. To ensure standardized facial orientation, each 3-D image was positioned to "best fit" the preoperative face by aligning 6 soft tissue landmarks. Forehead measurements were taken from a standardized position behind the surface of the face to landmarks placed in a ray configuration across the forehead.

SETTING

Academic teaching hospital.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen pediatric patients with metopic craniosynostosis who had undergone anterior cranial vault remodeling and age-matched controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Images were taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and over 1-year postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Forehead contours preoperatively and postoperatively, with statistics performed using a multivariate analysis of variance shape analysis.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative follow-up was 1.8 (0.6) years. The average distance from the origin to forehead landmarks was 55.1 (3.4) mm preoperatively, 59.3 (0.7) mm immediate postoperatively, 59.1 (1.0) mm 1-year postoperatively, and 59.4 (0.6) mm in controls. Postoperative metopic forehead contours varied significantly from preoperative contours ( P < .01), while there was no statistical difference between the 2 postoperative time points ( P = .70). One-year postoperative patients were not significantly different from their age-matched controls ( P > .99).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative metopic forehead contours varied significantly from postoperative contours. Cranial reconstructions approximated the foreheads of normal controls, and reconstructions were stable at more than 1-year follow-up.