A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis

Predisposing Factors for Postoperative Complications in the Year following Frontoorbital Advancement and Remodeling: A Single-Institution Study of 267 Patients

BACKGROUND

Frontoorbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is a common surgical approach used for craniosynostosis, conferring functional and aesthetic benefit. There are few reports examining predisposing factors for postoperative complications within the first year after surgery. This study aimed to establish complication rates and identify risk factors for inferior outcomes in a large population of patients undergoing FOAR.

METHODS

All patients who underwent FOAR from 2013 through 2022 at the authors' institution were retrospectively studied. Perioperative and postoperative data were collected to yield outcomes analyses. Multivariable logistic regression with backward selection was performed to identify predictors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients underwent FOAR. The overall complication rate was 14.2%, most commonly delayed wound healing (7.4%), postoperative blood transfusion (5.8%), and infection requiring readmission (1.9%). Tense closure independently predicted delayed wound healing ( P < 0.001) and infection requiring readmission ( P = 0.03). Syndromic patients were more likely than nonsyndromic patients to have undergone previous craniofacial surgery (45.3% versus 23.8%; P = 0.003). Syndromic status and previous craniofacial surgery were associated with increased risk of developing infection requiring readmission ( P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A greater proportion of malnourished patients experienced postoperative complications compared with patients without malnourishment (24.4% versus 12.1%; P = 0.031), although there were no significant differences in individual postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Identified risk factors for complications included syndromic status, tense closure, and previous craniofacial surgery. Most complications were managed nonoperatively. These factors may be considered in preoperative planning and when counseling families.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedures for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: What Do We Know?

Craniosynostosis is a congenital condition characterized by the premature fusion of cranial sutures, disrupting normal skull and potentially brain growth. The current gold standard for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis is open cranial vault remodeling, which was pioneered by surgeons like Tessier and Whitaker in the 1970s. Recent advances have led to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy with helmeting, spring-assisted cranioplasty, and distraction osteogenesis. These methods aim to minimize surgical trauma, reduce blood loss, and shorten recovery times. This review assesses the evidence comparing open and minimally invasive surgeries for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis.

Evolution of Craniosynostosis Care at a Single Institution Over an 11-Year Period

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of craniosynostosis is continuously evolving. There has been a shift from total vault procedures towards minimally invasive techniques, reflecting advances in the understanding of the condition and surgical technique. This study aims to document the evolution and outcomes of craniosynostosis care over an 11-year period at one academic institution.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was received. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative courses were collected for patients receiving surgical cranial vault correction for craniosynostosis at the authors' institution. Retrospective analysis was conducted with primary outcomes including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, estimated blood loss, and blood replacement volumes. χ2 tests and independent t tests determined significance (0.05).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Total vault remodeling procedures, the most common procedure from 2012 to 2017, significantly decreased in 2018 to 2023. An increase in spring-assisted cranioplasties occurred in 2018 to 2023. Frontal orbital advancement remained a popular choice throughout the examined period. Spring cranioplasties and respective protocols correlated with shorter procedure times (P=0.003), reduced ICU length of stay (P=0.004), and lower morphine equivalents given per admission (P=0.002) compared with traditional techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Craniosynostosis care has evolved considerably over the last decade. In the present study, the use of spring-assisted cranioplasty yielded benefits in reducing ICU stay and lowering morphine equivalents given. This study provides insights into how surgical care for craniosynostosis is adapting to new evidence-based studies and technologies, emphasizing the importance of continuous review and adaptation of treatment protocols.

Surgical Complications After Fronto-orbital Advancement for Craniosynostosis: Analysis of a National Database

BACKGROUND

Fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) is the standard surgical intervention for patients with craniosynostosis and associated fronto-orbital dysmorphology. Although previous studies have provided insights into center-specific complications, comprehensive, large-scale analyses remain limited. This study utilizes a national database to address these gaps, offering a large-scale perspective on FOA outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged 0 to 16 years who underwent FOA from 2007 to 2015 were identified using the PearlDiver database. Patients were divided into early (0-5 y) and late (6-16 y) groups. Complications were identified using a combination of ICD and CPT codes. Intraoperative complications, including hematoma/hemorrhage, cerebrovascular infarction, and cardiac arrest, were defined as those occurring within 48 hours of the procedure. Postoperative complications analyzed at intervals of 0, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days post-operation included cerebrospinal fluid leak, hardware-related complications, hemorrhage, seizure, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and death. Summary statistics were conducted utilizing Bellwether software in PearlDiver.

RESULTS

A total of 2026 patients underwent FOA, with a mean of 1.5 years in the younger cohort (n=1905) and 9.0 years in the older cohort (n=121). Although rare, hemorrhage was the most common intraoperative complication. One-year postoperative complications were predominantly related to wound dehiscence and surgical site infection in the younger (5.10%) and older (14.1%) cohorts. The 1-year reoperation rate was 7.2% for the younger cohort and 19.0% for the older cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

FOA is a safe operation with an overall low complication rate. However, older patients demonstrate a higher rate of reoperations, emphasizing the need to identify the optimal timing for FOA in patients with craniosynostosis.

A Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted and Open Frontoorbital Distraction for the Treatment of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Frontoorbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) is an established surgical technique for patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. The authors' institution has used an endoscope-assisted technique (endo-FODO) in recent years to decrease cutaneous scarring and lessen the impact on the functional growth matrix. This study compared perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing endo-FODO to those in patients undergoing the traditional coronal approach.

METHODS

Patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis undergoing FODO from 2013 to 2023 were included, and grouped by whether they underwent endo-FODO or a traditional coronal incision. Operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion volume, and length of hospitalization were compared. Cutaneous scarring at 1 year postoperatively was assessed with the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (18 traditional and 9 endoscope-assisted) with an average age of 5.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 5.1 to 6.3 months) at surgery were included, with no difference between groups (P = 0.999). Operative time was 114 minutes (IQR, 92 to 122 minutes) for traditional FODO and 104 minutes (IQR, 95 to 112 minutes) for endo-FODO (P = 0.607). Time under anesthesia was shorter for endo-FODO (traditional, 243 minutes [IQR, 218 to 264 minutes]; endo-FODO, 210 minutes [IQR, 191 to 224 minutes]; P = 0.029). Transfusion volume was 12.2 mL/kg lower for endo-FODO compared with traditional FODO (P = 0.001). Length of stay was similar between groups (P = 0.678). SCAR ratings were 1.83 (IQR, 1.1 to 4.47) in traditional FODO compared with 1.00 (IQR, 0.58 to 1.67) in the endo-FODO (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Endo-FODO was associated with reduced time under anesthesia, reduced transfusion requirements, and improved SCAR scores, with no change in duration of surgery, perioperative complications, or length of stay. Future work will compare functional and aesthetic outcomes between techniques.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Total Cranial Vault Remodelling Versus Minimally Invasive Suturectomy With Postoperative Helmet Therapy in Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Different surgical techniques have been explored over time to treat children with scaphocephaly. The objective of this study is to compare morbidity and cosmetic outcomes in total cranial vault remodelling (TCVR) and minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy (MISPH) in patients with scaphocephaly. The authors performed a retrospective comparative cohort study, including 43 patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent TCVR (n=17) or MISPH (n=26) at the Antwerp University Hospital between April 2008 and December 2022. MISPH was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (TCVR 199 ± 48 min, MISPH 69 ± 12 min, P <0.001), decreased blood loss (TCVR 610 ± 298 mL, MISPH 85 ± 73 mL, P <0.001) and lower transfusion rate (TCVR 100%, MISPH 54%, P <0.001). Mean length of stay at the intensive care unit and the hospital were significantly shorter after MISPH (TCVR 6 ± 1 d, MISPH 3 ± 0.5 d). The change in CI after TCVR was significantly larger than after MISPH during the first postoperative year. However, the CI in the MISPH group was significantly higher during the first year compared with the TCVR group. Mean CI of the MISPH group reached normal limits during the first year, while in the TCVR group, mean CI reached normal values 5 years after surgery. The authors could not find a statistically significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the 2 groups. The authors conclude that MISPH is associated with decreased morbidity and comparable cosmetic results when compared with TCVR in the treatment of scaphocephaly.

Endoscopic-assisted versus open fronto-orbital distraction for unicoronal craniosynostosis: morphometric and technique considerations

INTRODUCTION

In an effort to maximize benefit and minimize morbidity when performing fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) for unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS), we have transitioned to an endoscopic-assisted approach ("endo-FODO"). This study compares photogrammetric outcomes of patients who underwent FODO via an endoscopic-assisted versus open approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients treated for UCS from 2013 to 2023. Photogrammetric outcomes at one to three years postoperatively were compared between patients who underwent endo-FODO and age- and sex-matched controls who underwent open FODO. Differences between pre- and postoperative periorbital symmetry ratios, canthal tilt symmetry, and orbital dystopia angle (ODA) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (ten per group) underwent surgery at a mean age of 6.1 ± 1.8 and 5.4 ± 1.1 months (p = 0.426) and were photographed at 1.6 ± 0.9 and 1.8 ± 0.9 years (p = 0.597) postoperatively in the endo-FODO and open FODO groups, respectively. Patients who underwent endo-FODO demonstrated significant improvements in margin-reflex distance 1 (MRD1) symmetry ratio (p = 0.004), palpebral height symmetry ratio (p = 0.004), canthal tilt symmetry (p = 0.020), and ODA (p = 0.009). Patients who underwent open FODO likewise demonstrated significant improvements in MRD1 symmetry ratio (p = 0.004), palpebral height symmetry ratio (p = 0.033), and ODA (p = 0.004). All postoperative measurements as well as degrees of improvement were similar between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endo- and open FODO were associated with significant and comparable improvements in soft tissue periorbital symmetry and orbital dystopia at nearly two years postoperatively. While continued follow-up until cranial maturity is needed to assess the durability of aesthetic results, these data support a minimally invasive, endoscopic alternative to fronto-orbital distraction.

Factors Influencing Fronto-Orbital Relapse in Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A 2 Decade Review

Fronto-orbital retrusion may occur after primary surgical correction of craniosynostosis, particularly in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. This study investigated reoperation rates and factors contributing to FO relapse among this cohort. A retrospective review evaluated reoperation for FO relapse in patients with syndromic multisuture craniosynostosis who underwent primary fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) + calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) at our institution between 2004 and 2024. Revision surgeries included repeat FOA or monobloc advancement/distraction. FOA advancement distance was measured using postoperative computed tomography and Mimics software. ROC analysis evaluated the accuracy of FOA distance in predicting subsequent FO relapse. Conditional margins identified optimal advancement distances. Logistic regression of predictors of FO relapse adjusted for age at surgery, craniofacial syndrome, posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO), advancement distance, and postoperative helmet therapy. Fifty-two patients underwent a mean of 2.8±1.9 skeletal craniofacial procedures each. With a mean follow-up time of 9.2±6.5 years, 16 (30.8%) patients required reoperation for FO relapse. Larger advancement distances were the sole significant predictor of relapse, increasing the odds by 49.6% (OR 1.496, 95% CI: 1.085-2.063; P=0.014). Relapse rates were lower with advancements ≤17.2 mm (0.0%) than with further advancements (42.0%, P=0.002). Specifically, advancements >18.8 mm were associated with significantly higher relapse rates (P<0.05). Almost one-third of patients with multisuture syndromic craniosynostosis underwent FO region readvancement. Advancements <17.2 mm during initial FOA appeared to mitigate relapse, while advancing beyond 18.8 mm may increase the risk. Investigation of additional protective factors against FO relapse is encouraged to minimize surgical burden.

A coddling of the sagittal suture: inequality in spring-assisted expansion

PURPOSE

We examined differences in long-term morphometric outcomes of spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) for various forms of isolated nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of children who underwent SMC from 2011 to 2020 at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Cephalic indices (CI), Whitaker grades, parietal bone thickness, and degree of suture fusion were assessed. Frontal bossing and vertex-nasion-opisthocranion (VNO) angles were compared to a normal control group.

RESULTS

Fifty-four subjects underwent surgery at age 3.6 ± 1.0 months with follow-up of 6.3 ± 1.8 years. Mean CI was 75.2 ± 4.1 at 5.9 ± 2.0 years postoperatively. Mean CI were 75.8 ± 4.1 (n = 32), 76.4 ± 4.0 (n = 22), and 77.1 ± 4.8 (n = 11) at 5, 7, and 9+ years postoperatively, respectively. Three (5.6%) required reoperation for persistent scaphocephalic cranial deformity. Fifty-one (94.4%) were Whitaker Grade I. On physical examination, 12 (22.2%) demonstrated craniofacial abnormalities. At long-term follow-up, there were no differences in frontal bossing angle (102.7 ± 5.2 degrees versus 100.7 ± 5.6 degrees, p = .052) and VNO angle (44.9 ± 3.3 degrees versus 43.9 ± 2.2 degrees, p = .063) between study and control groups. Younger age at surgery predicted a lower Whitaker grade, more normalized VNO angle, and greater change in CI during active expansion. Increased percentage fused of the posterior sagittal suture predicted a higher Whitaker grade, while decreased anterior fusion was associated with frontal bossing and temporal hollowing.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, children undergoing spring-mediated cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis demonstrated maintenance of CI, favorable cosmetic outcomes, and a low reoperation rate at mid-term follow-up. Early intervention is associated with improved aesthetic outcomes, and regional fusion patterns may influence long-term craniofacial dysmorphology.

Craniosynostosis: Current Evaluation and Management

ABSTRACT

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, which can lead to abnormal skull shape and restricted skull growth. Although most cases are present in isolation, some are associated with genetic syndromes, such as Pfeiffer, Muenke, Couzon, Apert, and others, which increases the complexity of care. Today, a spectrum of surgical options to treat craniosynostosis are available and range from traditional open cranial vault remodeling to newer and less invasive suturectomy-based techniques. Which procedure is offered to a patient depends on not only the specific synostosis pattern but also factors such as patient age, the need for additional procedures or interventions, and evidence of elevated intracranial pressure. Thorough consultations with families to discuss achievable goals for cosmesis and function are essential in providing optimal care to each impacted child.

Comparative Analysis of Patient-reported Outcomes After Cranial Vault Remodeling and Strip Craniectomy With the FACE-Q Craniofacial Module

BACKGROUND

The debate continues among craniofacial surgeons regarding the effectiveness of strip craniectomy (SC) compared with cranial vault remodeling (CVR) in achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with single-suture craniosynostosis. This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between SC and CVR procedures at a single institution using the validated FACE-Q Craniofacial module.

METHODS

Patients older than or equal to 8 years of age and parents of patients younger than 8 years of age who underwent SC or CVR for single-suture craniosynostosis were eligible. Patients with <2 years of follow-up, lambdoid synostosis, and syndromes were excluded. Primary endpoints were PROs as measured by the FACE-Q, with higher scores indicating increased health-related quality of life. Linear regression was used to control for covariates.

RESULTS

Sixty-two participants completed the module (response rate 33.3%). SC was performed in 29 patients (46.8%), and CVR in 33 patients (53.2%). On unadjusted bivariate analysis, SC patients had higher eye (P=0.03) and forehead (P=0.05) scores. On regression analysis, controlling for sex, race, craniosynostosis type, and follow-up, there were no significant differences between operation types in any domain. Metopic and sagittal synostosis were associated with higher Eye (metopic: 17.61, P=0.049; sagittal: 41.44, P<0.001) and Head scores (metopic: 48.12, P=0.001; sagittal: 49.35, P<0.001), and sagittal synostosis was associated with higher Face (38.16, P<0.001), Forehead (55.93, P<0.001), and Nose scores (19.28, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

From patients' and parents' perspectives at a single institution, SC and CVR were equivalent regarding aesthetics and health-related quality of life.

Long-term outcomes after surgical correction of anterior plagiocephaly secondary to isolated frontosphenoidal synostosis: a systematic review and two illustrative cases

PURPOSE

Anterior plagiocephaly ( AP), secondary to isolated frontosphenoidal synostosis (IFS), represents one of the rarest forms of craniosynostosis documented in medical literature. Therefore, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the long-term (> 2 years) postoperative outcomes of this minor suture synostosis.

METHODS

This study presents the long-term outcomes of two patients previously treated for IFS, detailing their clinical, imaging, and postoperative characteristics. Additionally, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA criteria to summarize existing literature on the topic. The review specifically focuses on long-term aesthetic outcomes, reoperation rates, and complications following surgical intervention for IFS.

RESULTS

Four articles encompassing 12 patients were included in the systematic review. The review highlights clinical features, postoperative complications, reoperation rates, and long-term aesthetic outcomes. The mean age at surgery was 17.5 months (range 9.5-24 months), with an average age at diagnosis of 9.3 months (range 6-10 months). Fronto-orbital advancement was the predominant surgical approach described across all cases. The reoperation rate among patients was 16.6%, with only two cases reporting postoperative complications. In one of our cases, an intraoperative CT scan was utilized to illustrate real-time improvement in frontal bone alignment according to the surgical plan, which significantly contributed to positive long-term clinical outcomes observed during a follow-up period exceeding 24 months.

CONCLUSION

IFS, is a rare minor suture synostosis, significantly affects the aesthetic appearance of the forehead and necessitates consideration in the management of AP cases. Surgical intervention has shown minimal reoperation rates and excellent long-term prognosis. These findings are reinforced by recent institutional data and a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature.

Skeletal and Soft Tissue Surgeries in the Long-term Management of Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A 20-Year Review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue procedures are often crucial for normalizing the long-term facial appearance in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, yet they are underrepresented in the literature and existing treatment algorithms. This study evaluated secondary soft tissue surgeries in relation to skeletal operations in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated at a tertiary children's hospital from 2003 to 2023. Craniofacial skeletal and soft tissue procedures were assessed for timing and frequency. Skeletal surgeries included redo fronto-orbital advancements, monobloc advancement/distraction ± facial bipartition, and LeFort III or III/I advancement/distraction. Soft tissue surgeries encompassed oculoplastic procedures, scalp reconstruction, fat grafting, and septorhinoplasty.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, 57 (57.8%) underwent ≥1 secondary skeletal operation, and 101 (95.3%) underwent ≥1 soft tissue procedures, averaging 3.7 ± 3.3 soft tissue procedures per patient. Patients who underwent secondary forehead advancement had significantly higher rates of subsequent lateral canthopexy (71.4% vs 25.6, P < 0.001), ptosis reconstruction (17.9% vs 7.7%, P = 0.025), and frontotemporal fat grafting (50.0% vs 15.4%, P < 0.001) than those who did not. Patients who underwent midface advancement surgery had significantly higher rates of subsequent lateral canthopexy (65.4% vs 11.1%, P < 0.001), medial canthopexy (7.7% vs 0.0%, P = 0.038), scalp reconstruction (36.5% vs 16.7%, P = 0.020), frontotemporal fat grafting (34.6% vs 14.8%, P = 0.018), malar fat grafting (11.5% vs 0.0%, P = 0.010), and septorhinoplasty (26.9% vs 1.9%, P < 0.001) than those who did not. Specifically, LeFort III or III/I advancement/distractions were significantly associated with higher rates of subsequent septorhinoplasties (33.3% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 10.2 ± 7.0 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed an intricate interplay between skeletal and soft tissue surgery in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Exploring techniques to reduce the need for further corrective surgery and anticipating necessary secondary interventions may improve patient counseling and outcomes.

Postoperative Orbital Morphology Observations Following Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Cranial Vault Remodeling in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Synostosis

OBJECT

Observations of preoperative and postoperative orbital morphology following fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOA and CVR) in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included patients diagnosed with unilateral coronal synostosis and treated with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University. The orbital height, orbital width, and orbital volume were obtained from head 3-dimensional computed tomography of preoperation and postoperation. The DICOM data of CT were then imported into mimics research version 21.0. The authors measured OH and OW according to the bony landmarks, then reset the parameters of the soft tissue window, and conducted a 3-dimensional reconstruction of the orbital soft tissue to get OV. The preoperative and postoperative measurements of the intact side were compared with the affected side, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0 (Ρ=0.05).

RESULTS

Twelve patients with UCS (5 male, 7 female) meeting criteria were included in the study. There were 4 patients with UCS on the left and 8 on the right. The average age at initial surgery was 19.50 months. Before the operation, the data of the intact side and the affected side were compared, respectively, and the difference was found to be significant in OH (Ρ=0.005) and OW (Ρ=0.005), while the OV (Ρ=0.106) was not statistically significant. After procedures of FOA and CVR, the data of the intact side and the affected side were compared, respectively, the significant difference was found in OV (Ρ=0.002), while not in OH (Ρ=0.060) or OW (Ρ=0.066).

CONCLUSION

After undergoing the operation of FOA and CVR, the OH and OW of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of patients with UCS were basically symmetrical, while the volume of the affected orbit was still relatively smaller.

Optimal untwisting of the orbital bandeau in unicoronal craniosynostosis correction: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is highly complex due to its asymmetric appearance. Although fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) is a versatile technique for craniosynostosis correction, harmonization of the orbital bandeau in UCS is difficult to predict. This study evaluates the biomechanics of the orbital bandeau using different patterns and varying characteristics of inner cortical bone layer osteotomies in a finite element (FE) analysis.

METHOD

An FE model was created using the computed tomography (CT) scan of a 6.5-month-old male infant with a right-sided UCS. The unaffected side of the orbital bandeau was virtually mirrored, and anatomical correction of the orbital bandeau was simulated. Different combinations of osteotomy patterns, numbers, depths, and widths were examined (n = 48) and compared to an uncut model.

RESULTS

Reaction forces and maximum stress values differed significantly (p < 0.01) among osteotomy patterns and between each osteotomy characteristic. Regardless of the osteotomy pattern, higher numbers of osteotomies significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with reductions in reaction force and maximum stress. An X-shaped configuration with three osteotomies deep and wide to the bone was biomechanically the most favorable model.

CONCLUSION

Inner cortical bone layer osteotomy might be an effective modification to the conventional FOA approach in terms of predictable shaping of the orbital bandeau.

Posterior Vault Distraction in the Acute Setting

ABSTRACT

Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) has been shown to resolve acute intracranial hypertension (AIH) while carrying an acceptable perioperative morbidity profile. PVDO has been associated with symptomatic improvement and fewer surgeries in those requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunts. The authors' experience using PVDO as an acute intervention is presented, demonstrating its safety and efficacy for management of AIH. Four cases of children with craniosynostosis that underwent PVDO in the acute setting are outlined. All patients presented with papilledema and symptoms of AIH. One patient with slit ventricle syndrome (SVS) presented with a nonfunctioning shunt following multiple shunt revisions. No intraoperative complications during distractor placement or removal were reported. Distraction protocol for all patients began on postoperative day 1 at 1-2 mm per day, resulting in an average total distraction of 30.25 mm. For the 3 cases with no shunt, the average length of stay was 7 days. As part of the planned treatment course, the patient with SVS required externalization of the shunt during distraction followed by early distractor removal and planned shunt replacement. One case of surgical site infection (in an immunocompromised patient) required premature distractor removal during the consolidation period. Computed tomography (CT) in all patients indicated increased intracranial volume following distraction, and symptomatic improvement was reported. Six-month follow-up showed resolution of papilledema in all patients. The authors' experience using PVDO in the acute setting is reported, alongside a review of current literature, in order to provide supporting evidence for the efficacy of PVDO as a tool for resolving AIH.

The Esthetic Perception of Morphological Severity in Scaphocephalic Patients is Correlated With Specific Head Geometrical Features

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between perception of craniofacial deformity, geometric head features, and 3D head shape analyzed by statistical shape modeling (SSM).

PATIENTS

A total of 18 unoperated patients with scaphocephaly (age  =  5.2  ±  1.1m)-6 were followed-up after spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) (age  =  9.6  ±  1.5m)-and 6 controls (age  =  6.7  ±  2.5m).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

3D head shapes were retrieved from 3D scans or computed tomography (CTs). Various geometrical features were measured: anterior and posterior prominence, take-off angle, average anterior and posterior lateral and horizontal curvatures, cranial index (CI) (cranial width over length), and turricephaly index (TI) (cranial height over length). SSM and principal component analysis (PCA) described shape variability. All models were 3D printed; the perception of deformity was blindly scored by 9 surgeons and 1 radiologist in terms of frontal bossing (FB), occipital bulleting (OB), biparietal narrowing (BN), low posterior vertex (LPV), and overall head shape (OHS).

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was found between FB and anterior prominence (r  =  0.56, P < .01) and take-off angle (r  =  - 0.57, P < .01). OB correlated with average posterior lateral curvature (r  =  0.43, P < 0.01) similarly to BPN (r  =  0.55, P < .01) and LPV (r  =  0.43, P < .01). OHS showed strong correlation with CI (r  =   - 0.68, P < .01) and TI (r  =  0.63, P< .01). SSM Mode 1 correlated with OHS (r  =  0.66, p < .01) while Mode 3 correlated with FB (r  =   - 0.58, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Esthetic cranial appearance in craniofacial patients is correlated to specific geometric parameters and could be estimated using automated methods such as SSM.

Technical evolution of pediatric neurosurgery: craniosynostosis from 1972 to 2023 and beyond

Very few clinical entities have undergone so many different treatment approaches over such a short period of time as craniosynostosis. Surgical treatments for this condition have ranged from simple linear craniectomies, accounting for the specific role of cranial sutures in assuring the normal growth of the skull, to more complex cranial vault reconstructions, based on the perceived role of the skull base in affecting the growth of the skull. While a great deal of evolution has occurred, there remains controversy regarding the ideal treatment including the best surgical technique, the optimal age for surgery, and the long-term morphological and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The evolution of the surgical management of craniosynostosis in the last 50 years has been affected by several factors. This includes the awareness of needing to operate on affected children during infancy to achieve the best results, the use of multistage operations, the availability of more sophisticated surgical tools, and improved perioperative care. In some forms of craniosynostosis, the operations can be carried out at a very young age with low morbidity, and with the postoperative use of a molding helmet, springs, or distractors, these operations prove to be as effective as traditional larger cranial reconstructions performed in older children. As a consequence, complex surgical operations have become progressively less utilized. A second relevant advance was the more recent advent of a molecular diagnosis, which allowed us to understand the pathogenesis of some associated malformations and neurodevelopmental issues that were observed in some children despite appropriate surgical treatment. Future research should focus on improving the analysis of longer-term outcomes and understanding the natural history of craniofacial conditions, including what issues persist despite optimal surgical correction. Progress in molecular investigations concerning the normal and pathological development of cranial sutures could be a further significant step in the management of craniosynostosis, possibly favoring a "medical" treatment in the near future. Artificial intelligence will likely have a role in establishing the diagnosis with less reliance on radiographic studies and in assisting with surgical planning. Overall, much progress has been made, but there remains much to do.

Patient-Specific Implants and Fat Grafting for Contour Deformities Post Craniosynostosis Reconstruction: A Therapeutic Approach

BACKGROUND

Contour deformities after fronto-orbital advancement for craniosynostosis reconstruction are commonly encountered. There is a paucity of literature describing secondary procedures to correct such deformities with reported outcomes. An approach to defect analysis and procedure selection is lacking. The authors present our experience utilizing fat grafting (FG) and patient-specific implant (PSI) reconstruction as management strategies for this population.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent secondary onlay PSI or FG for contour deformities after primary craniosynostosis reconstruction was carried out. Patient demographics, defect analysis, surgical approach, postoperative complications, and esthetic outcomes were recorded. Data were pooled across the entire cohort and presented in a descriptive manner.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (36% syndromic and 64% isolated) were identified that either underwent PSI (n = 7) with a mean follow-up of 56.3 weeks, FG (n = 5) with a mean follow-up of 36 weeks or a combination of both (n = 2) for deformities postcraniosynostis surgery. Supraorbital retrusion and bitemporal hollowing were the most common deformities. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. All patients achieved Whitaker class I esthetic outcomes and there were no additional revisions during the defined study period. The presence of a significant structural component or large (>5 mm) depression typically necessitated a PSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Contour deformities after fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction can be successfully managed using FG and PSI either as a combination procedure or in isolation. The authors have proposed anatomical criteria based on our experience to help guide procedure selection. Future prospective studies would be beneficial in providing more objective assessment criteria.

Long-term aesthetic and photogrammetric outcomes in non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling

BACKGROUND

Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is among the most common surgical approaches for unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS), although some data demonstrate failure to achieve long-term aesthetic normalcy, leading some to seek alternative treatment paradigms such as fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO). This study compares long-term aesthetic outcomes of patients with UCS treated with FOAR and FODO.

METHODS

Twenty patients (four males) with non-syndromic UCS presenting to our institution and undergoing distraction were compared to a matched cohort of 20 patients (six males) undergoing FOAR. Clinical photographs and ImageJ were used to quantify periorbital anatomy including palpebral fissures, pupil-to-brow distance (PTB), and margin-reflex distance (MRD₁) in pixels. Whitaker classification was blindly assigned by craniofacial surgeons.

RESULTS

Photogrammetric analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated significantly improved postoperative symmetry in distraction patients for palpebral width (p = 0.020), MRD₁ (p = 0.045), and canthal tilt (p = 0.010). Average Whitaker classification scores between FOAR (1.94) and distraction (1.79) cohorts were similar (p = 0.374).

CONCLUSIONS

UCS patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in periorbital symmetry, with distraction patients demonstrating superior results in palpebral width and canthal tilt. FOAR and FODO patients achieved similar Whitaker classification scores. These cohorts will be followed until craniofacial maturity prior to making any definitive conclusions.

Which centers should be authorized to treat craniosynostosis? A plea for quality and not for quantity

BACKGROUND

In centers for craniosynostosis surgery, the volume of activity does not necessarily reflect the quality of the treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyze a retrospective series of patients over a period of 6 years in a low-volume craniosynostosis surgery center, and to study indicators that reflect the quality of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis included all patients who underwent a craniofacial surgery for all forms of craniosynostosis during the period 2012-2017 (annual follow-up for 4 years). Data on the type of synostosis, sex, age, weight, type of surgery, duration of surgery, blood transfusion, postinterventional care, and total length of hospital stay were collected. Medical and surgical complications were recorded using the Leeds classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 patients (33 male; 23 cases of scaphocephaly, 13 cases of trigonocephaly, 4 cases of coronal plagiocephaly, 1 case of lambdoid plagiocephaly, and 1 case of brachycephaly) underwent craniofacial surgery with a median age of 7.4 months [4.8; 10.4] and a mean weight of 8.40 ± 1.92 kg at surgery. The median hospital stay was 7 days [6;7] with 1 day in the postinterventional care unit for 83% of patients. The global complication rate was 12% (95% CI: 4%-26%) with three minor cutaneous and two major (cardiovascular and septic) complications.

CONCLUSION

Complication rates reflect the quality of care in a center that treats craniosynostosis much more than do the number of procedures, mean hospital stay, and blood transfusion rates. It is essential to define new indicators capable of measuring the quality of life linked to surgical procedures and of using them to assess the competence of a center.

Evaluation of Complications and Outcomes in Craniosynostosis by Age of Operation: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

Considerable controversy exists around the optimal age on which to operate for craniosynostosis. This study aims to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric to assess the impact of operative age on hospital stay and outcomes. After excluding patients who underwent endoscopic cranial vault remodeling, a total of 3292 patients met inclusion criteria in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric between 2012 and 2019. Median age at surgery was 300 days (interquartile range: 204-494). Patients between 0 and 6 months underwent the highest proportion of complex cranial vault remodeling, Current Procedural Terminology 61,558 ( n =44, 7.7%) and Current Procedural Terminology 61,559 ( n =317, 55.1%). White blood cell counts peaked in the 12 to 18 months group, and were lowest in the 24± months group. Hematocrit was lowest in the 0 to 6 months group and rose steadily to the 24± months group; the inverse pattern was found in platelet concentration, which was highest in the youngest patients and lowest in the oldest. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time were relatively consistent across all age groups. Younger patients had significantly shorter operating room times, which increased with patient age ( P <0.001). Younger patients also had significantly shorter length of stay ( P =0.009), though length of stay peaked between 12 and 18 months. There was a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection in younger patients, which occurred in 0.7% of patients 0 to 12 months and 1.0 to 3.0% in patients over 12 to 24± months. There was no significant difference in the average number of transfusions required in any age group ( P =0.961).

Neurodevelopment in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The current literature on unilateral coronal craniosynostosis is replete with repair techniques and surgical outcomes; however, information regarding neurodevelopment remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the neurodevelopmental outcomes of patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis compared with their healthy peers or normative data.

METHODS

A systematic review of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from database inception to January 19, 2022, was performed. Included studies assessed neurodevelopment of patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results of developmental tests were compared with normative data or controls to generate Hedges' g statistics for meta-analysis. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included and analyzed, with an overall fair reporting quality. A meta-analysis of 325 postoperative patients demonstrated that scores of general neurodevelopment were below average but within one standard deviation of the norm (Hedges' g = -0.68 [95% CI -0.90 to -0.45], p < 0.001). Similarly, postoperative patients exhibited lower scores in verbal, psychomotor, and mathematic outcome assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis had poorer neurodevelopment, although scores generally remained within the normal range. These data may guide implementation of regular neurocognitive assessments and early learning support of patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

Implementation of Upper Extremity Trauma Registry: A Pilot Study

Background

Hand traumas are common in young men and their complications can have negative effects on their occupation and economic activities. On the other hand, most of the hand injuries are related to occupation accidents and thus necessitates preventive measures. The goal of a clinical registry is assisting epidemiologic surveys, quality improvement preventions.

Methods

This article explains the first phase of implementing a registry for upper extremity trauma. This phase includes recording of demographic data of patients. A questionnaire was designed. Contents include patients' characteristics, pattern of injury and past medical history in a minimal data set checklist. This questionnaire was filled in the emergency room by general practitioners. For 2 months the data were collected in paper based manner, then problems and obstacles were evaluated and corrected. During this period a web based software was designed. The registry was then ran for another 4 months using web based software.

Results

From 6.11.2019 to 5.3.2020, 1675 patients were recorded in the registry. Random check of recorded data suggests that accuracy of records was about 95.5%. Most of the missing data was related to associated injuries and job experience. Some mechanisms of injury seems to be related to Iran community and thus warrants special attention for preventive activities.

Conclusion

With a special registry personnel and supervision of plastic surgery faculties, an accurate record of data of upper extremity trauma is possible. The patterns of injury were remarkable and can be used for investigations and policy making for prevention.

3-Dimensional Morphometric Outcomes After Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Unicoronal Synostosis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting (ESCH) for unicoronal synostosis has shown to be a less morbid procedure when compared with fronto-orbital remodeling (FOR). We aim in this pilot study to report objective methods and quantitative morphologic outcomes of endoscopically treated unicoronal synostosis using 3-dimensional surface scans.

METHODS

Our electronic records were reviewed for ophthalmological, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and helmet-related complications. For morphologic outcomes, the following parameters were used: Cranial Index, Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index, Anterior Symmetry Ratio (ASR), and Root Mean Square between the normal and synostotic sides of the head. Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry scans were evaluated at 3 time points preoperative, 6 months post-op, and at the end of the treatment, which was compared with age-matched scans of normal controls and FOR patients. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

None of the ESCH cases developed strabismus, major neurodevelopmental delay, or helmet complications. All morphologic parameters improved significantly at 6 months post-op except for the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index. The ASR was the only parameter to change significantly between 6 months post-op and final scans. At end of helmet treatment, ASR and Root Mean Square differed significantly between the ESCH and both FOR and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting for single unicoronal synostosis had excellent clinical outcomes. Most of the improvement in head morphology occurred in the first 6 months of treatment. Despite the normalization of the overall head shape, there was residual asymmetry in the frontal and temporal regions of the head.

Neoforehead Remodelling Techniques for Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodelling in the Oxford Craniofacial Unit: Lateral Remodelling and a Novel Central Self-Stabilizing S-Osteotomy Technique

Fronto-orbital advancement and remodelling (FOAR) has undergone many modifications over the years, aimed at improving outcomes and reducing risks for patients. This work describes 2 techniques for remodelling the neoforehead used by the Oxford Craniofacial Unit since 1995: lateral remodelling and a central S-Osteotomy. Both methods adopt bone from the vertex as a neoforehead, but they differ in their techniques to adapt its shape to that of the newly remodelled orbital bandeau. The novel S-Osteotomy technique can be successfully applied to all FOAR procedures, irrespective of underlying synostosis and calvarial symmetry. It was originally developed for when 2 separate bony panels were required to create a neoforehead in asymmetrical cases, but was adopted for single panel neoforehead designs in metopic synostosis with the idea it may reduce temporal hollowing. An investigation of temporal hollowing in these patients who underwent either of the described methods was undertaken to assess this hypothesis with no statistically significant difference seen ( P =0.1111). Both techniques on average resulted in minimal hollowing that was not felt to require any revision, supporting the belief that temporal hollowing is a multifactorial issue. This work describes 2 successful methods of neoforehead remodelling and introduces the S-Osteotomy technique that can be applied in all FOAR procedures.

One-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis without bandeau in patients with coronal craniosynostosis: A five-year follow-up retrospective study of 45 consecutive patients

This study aimed to review the surgical outcomes, complications, and long-term relapses in patients with unilateral or bilateral coronal craniosynostosis, who underwent one-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) without bandeau. The cephalic index, frontal angle, and supraorbital symmetry ratio were measured on the initial and follow-up computed tomography images. Esthetic outcomes were evaluated using the Whitaker classification. 45 patients were included in this study. The average follow-up interval was 5.4 ± 1.1 years (range 2.5-8.5 years). In patients with bilateral coronal craniosynostosis, the frontal angle decreased with a relapse ratio of -2.8 ± 4.3% during long-term follow-up compared with that during short-term follow-up (p = 0.028). In patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis, the supraorbital symmetry ratio decreased slightly, with a relapse ratio of -3.8 ± 2.6% during long-term follow-up (p = 0.017). Complications included dural tears during osteotomy (n = 2), early distractor removal (n = 2), and wound problems (n = 3). Within the limitations of the study it seems that one-piece fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) generates successful and sustainable results even in the long term. Therefore, this treatment option should be considered for patients with unilateral and bilateral coronal craniosynostoses whenever appropriate.

Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic and Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostoses

Fronto-orbital advancement remains a powerful technique for the correction of anterior cranial vault differences related to metopic (trigonocephaly) or unilateral coronal (anterior plagiocephaly) craniosynostoses. Traditional fronto-orbital advancement requires access to the forehead and superior 2/3 of the orbit via a coronal incision. The frontal bone and orbital segment (bandeau) are then separated from the skull and reshaped. In patients with metopic craniosynostosis, the bandeau and frontal bone will need to be advanced and widened. In patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis, the bandeau will need to be "untwisted" to address the supraorbital retrusion on the affected side, the affected orbit will need to be shortened and widened, and the frontal bone flap will need to be proportionately advanced on the affected side. Overcorrection of the affected dimension should be undertaken to account for growth and relapse.

Endoscope-Assisted Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis

SUMMARY

Anterior cranial vault fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis. A minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted approach offers the additional potential benefits of less scalp scarring, decreased blood loss, and decreased scalp dissection. In this article, the authors present a novel technique for minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis.

The Use of the Three-Dimensional Printed Polyether Ether Ketone Implant in Secondary Craniosynostosis Revision

BACKGROUND

Skull deformities may be seen in patients years after craniosynostosis correction. These deformities cause psychosocial distress in affected patients. In this series, the authors describe the use of patient specific polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants for correction of skull deformities after cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted for 3 revision procedures performed by 1 plastic surgeon in collaboration with 1 neurosurgeon, both affiliated with Northwell Health. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to design three-dimensional (3D) printed PEEK implants manufactured by KLS Martin. Implants were used to correct frontal and orbital asymmetry and skull deformities in each patient. Outcomes were assessed at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-operation.

RESULTS

Two males and 1 female, ages 13, 17, and 19, underwent revision cranioplasty or orbital rim reconstruction using a custom, single piece 3D printed PEEK implant. All 3 patients underwent cranial vault remodeling in infancy; 1 was treated for coronal craniosynostosis and 2 were treated for metopic craniosynostosis. Revision cranioplasty operative times were 90, 105, and 147 minutes, with estimated blood loss of 45 mL, 75 mL, and 150 mL, respectively. One patient went home on post op day 1 and 2 patients went home on post op day 2. All patients had an immediate improvement in structural integrity and cranial contour, and all patients were pleased with their aesthetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom 3D printed PEEK implants offer a single piece solution in revision cranioplasty surgery to correct skull deformities after cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis.

Treatment of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis by Rotational Flap Technique Preserves Blood Supply to the Frontal Bone Flap

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) remains a challenging problem. Long-term results are often unsatisfactory secondary to recurrence of the original deformity, requiring secondary operations such as fat grafting or complete revision of the calvarial remodeling. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has recently emerged as a new modality for treatment of UCS, with promising results and decreased rates of reoperation compared with open cranial vault remodeling. A theoretical benefit of DO is preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone following osteotomy, as the frontal bone can be retained in situ compared with the complete removal and reshaping of the frontal bone during traditional fronto-orbital advancement. Preservation of blood supply to the frontal bone may allow for more robust bony healing and preservation of long-term growth potential; however, the vascularity of the frontal bone flap in DO has not previously been demonstrated. Here, we demonstrate unequivocally that blood supply to the frontal bone is preserved after creation of a rotational bone flap in DO management of UCS.

METHODS

Frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO treatment of UCS was performed via previously reported technique. Indocyanine green was injected intravenously, and bone perfusion was assessed with a fluorescence imaging system.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent three cranial remodeling and three distractor removal procedures. After frontal bone flap creation via osteotomy for DO, perfusion to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is preserved. Blood flow is seen crossing the midline of the frontal bone. After removal of the distractor, perfusion in the osteoid consolidate is also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of blood supply has not been previously demonstrated empirically in the setting of DO treatment of UCS. We show for the first time that during frontal bone flap creation, blood flow to the osteotomized portion of the frontal bone flap is maintained. Robust blood flow to the osteoid consolidate is also demonstrated. These data support the use of DO in treatment of UCS, as preserved blood supply to the bone is more likely to support improved healing and long-term results.

School-age outcomes in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic strip craniectomy

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes research on unilateral coronal synostosis is mostly limited to the early postoperative period. This study examines facial asymmetry, desire for revision, and patient-reported outcomes at school age in children who received either endoscopic strip craniectomy with helmet therapy or fronto-orbital advancement (open repair).

METHODS

Patients with repaired unilateral coronal synostosis born between 2000 and 2017, with 3D photographs taken when they were between 3.5 and 8 years of age, were eligible for study inclusion. Three pairs of bilateral linear measurements and two angular measurements were taken. Parent- and physician-reported desire for revision and patient-reported outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System cognitive function and Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders stigma scores) were collected from patient charts.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients qualified, including 25 with open repair and 10 with endoscopic repair. The median patient ages at repair were 3 months and 8 months in the endoscopic and open groups, respectively. The average ages at final 3D photography were 5.8 years and 5.5 years in the endoscopic and open groups, respectively. Digital anthropometry revealed no significant differences in measures of facial asymmetry between the repair groups (p ≥ 0.211). Midface depth (tragion to subnasale) was significantly less symmetric at school age than other linear measures (F(2,102) = 9.14, p < 0.001). Forehead asymmetry was significantly associated with parent- and physician-reported desire for revision (p ≤ 0.006). No significant associations were found between physical asymmetry and patient-reported stigma or cognitive function (p > 0.046, Holm-Bonferroni correction).

CONCLUSIONS

Children who underwent open or endoscopic repair for unilateral coronal synostosis have comparable facial symmetry at school age, but midface depth remains highly asymmetrical in both groups. Forehead asymmetry at school age correlates with parent- and physician-reported desire for revision.

Computed Tomography in Patients With Craniosynostosis: A Survey to Ascertain Practice Patterns Among Craniofacial Surgeons

BACKGROUND

In patients with craniosynostosis, imaging remains up to the discretion of the plastic surgeon or neurosurgeon. To inform best practice guidelines, we sought to obtain data surrounding the frequency at which craniofacial surgeons order computed tomography (CT), as well as indications. We hypothesized that we would identify considerable variation in both imaging and associated indications.

METHODS

We surveyed members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons and the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons to measure the frequency of preoperative and postoperative head CTs, as well as indications. Initial items were piloted with 2 craniofacial surgeons and 1 neurosurgeon, using interviews to ensure content validity. χ2 Tests were used to measure associations between operative volume, years in practice, and imaging.

RESULTS

Eighty-five craniofacial surgeons responded (13.8% response rate), with the majority (63.5%) having performed a craniosynostosis operation in the last month. Only 9.4% of surgeons never order preoperative CTs. Of those who do, the most common indications included diagnosis confirmation (31.2%) and preoperative planning (27.3%). About 25% of surgeons always obtain postoperative head CTs, usually to evaluate surgical outcomes (46.7%). Only 13.3% of respondents order 2 or more postoperative scans. Higher operative volume was associated with a lower likelihood of ordering preoperative head CTs (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of surgeons obtain preoperative head CTs, whereas only 25% obtain CTs postoperatively, often to evaluate outcomes. Because outcomes may be evaluated clinically, this is a poor use of resources and exposes children to radiation. Consensus guidelines are needed to create best practices and limit unnecessary studies.

Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

The surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis usually relies on the subjective judgment of surgeons to determine the configuration of the cranial bone fragments and the degree of overcorrection. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a new approach for automatic planning of fronto-orbital advancement based on statistical shape models and including overcorrection.

METHODS

This study presents a planning software to automatically estimate osteotomies in the fronto-orbital region and calculate the optimal configuration of the bone fragments required to achieve an optimal postoperative shape. The optimal cranial shape is obtained using a statistical head shape model built from 201 healthy subjects (age 23 ± 20 months; 89 girls). Automatic virtual plans were computed for nine patients (age 10.68 ± 1.73 months; four girls) with different degrees of overcorrection, and compared with manual plans designed by experienced surgeons.

RESULTS

Postoperative cranial shapes generated by automatic interventional plans present accurate matching with normative morphology and enable to reduce the malformations in the fronto-orbital region by 82.01 ± 6.07%. The system took on average 19.22 seconds to provide the automatic plan, and allows for personalized levels of overcorrection. The automatic plans with an overcorrection of 7 mm in minimal frontal breadth provided the closest match (no significant difference) to the manual plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The automatic software technology effectively achieves correct cranial morphometrics and volumetrics with respect to normative cranial shapes. The automatic approach has the potential to reduce the duration of preoperative planning, reduce inter-surgeon variability, and provide consistent surgical outcomes.

Single Segment Neo-Bandeau Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Children With Craniosynostosis: Technique Adaptation and Craniometric Analysis

ABSTRACT

Fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) of the anterior skull and orbital bandeau is standard of care for craniosynostosis with anterior morphology. Fronto-orbital retrusion, temporal hollowing, and bony contour irregularities are commonly seen in long-term follow-up. In this study, we report several technical adaptations of a new FOA technique described in Fearon et al that help facilitate adaptation of the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA technique in preparation of use in younger patients, and perform a craniometric analysis of the technique. Five consecutive patients who underwent the single-segment neo-bandeau FOA in 2020 with available pre- and post-operative three-dimensional head computed tomography scans were studied. Using Materialise Mimics (Materialise, Ghent, Belgium), cranial length, cranial height, cranial widths, and intracranial volume were measured. Two (40%) patients were male and all were non-Hispanic White with a median age at surgery of 18.6 months (interquartile range 10.4-45.7). Three patients (60%) had bicoronal or other multi-suture craniosynostosis, and 1 each had metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis. Intraoperatively measured intracranial pressure decreased from 17.8 mmHg (R 13.0-20.0) before craniectomy to 4.8 mmHg (R 2.0-11.0; P = 0.038) after craniectomy. Anterior cranial width increased postoperatively (mean 92.6 mm; R 74.9-111.5 versus 117.6 mm; R 109.8-135.2, P = 0.005). Intracranial volume increased from preoperative (mean 1211 cm3; R 782-1949 cm3) to postoperative (1387 cm3; R 1022-2108 cm3; P = 0.009). The authors find in this small sample that a single-segment neo-bandeau FOA demonstrates volumetric expansion similar to conventional FOA techniques and is feasible in infants under 1 year of age.

A Single-Center Retrospective Review of Perioperative Complications and Reoperation Rates Between Open Cranial Vault Remodeling and Distraction Osteogenesis for Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is the third most prevalent form of craniosynostosis. Traditional treatment of UCS has been achieved with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOAR), but utilization of cranial distraction osteogenesis (DO) techniques has increased. This study aims to compare perioperative complications and reoperation trends in FOAR versus DO techniques at a single institution.

METHODS

An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was performed from January 1999 to November 2018 at a single institution. Patients were those that have undergone FOAR or DO with an anterior rotational flap technique as previously described. Indications for secondary procedures included: contour deformities, relapse, surgical site infection, and persistent cranial defects.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients with UCS were identified, 64 patients underwent FOAR and 17 patients underwent DO. When perioperative characteristics were compared, patients who underwent DO were younger in age, however, there was no significant difference in transfusion requirement or length of stay between patient cohorts. Surgery time was increased in DO patients. When perioperative complications were compared, more intraoperative dural tears were observed in the FOAR cohort. When unplanned reoperation rates were compared, patients who had undergone FOAR had a statistically significant higher reoperation rates at 5 years of follow up. When including routine distractor removal as a reoperation, reoperative rate was increased in the DO cohort. No difference in reoperation rates was noted at 5 years following index operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of DO is similar to that of traditional FOAR techniques for treatment of UCS. Longer-term follow-up studies are needed to elucidate whether outcomes are durable, but the unplanned reoperation rate in DO is less than that of FOAR at 5 years and presents several advantages that warrants its use in patients with UCS.

Objective Analysis of Fronto-Orbital Dysmorphology in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

ABSTRACT

Correction (and over-correction) of asymmetries of the orbital shape and brow position in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is critical to successful fronto-orbital advancement. Here we quantify and three-dimensionally assess fronto-orbital irregularities in UCS patients compared to controls.Twenty-three patients with UCS evaluated at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh between 2006 and 2016 were age and gender-matched to controls. Computed tomography scans were reconstructed and evaluated for orbital metrics. A three-dimensional heat map of orbital regions was generated and evaluated for shape differences.Brow protrusion of the orbit ipsilateral to the synostotic suture did not differ significantly from healthy controls. Orbital height was significantly increased while orbital width was decreased on the UCS ipsilateral side compared to the contralateral side and controls. The ipsilateral cornea was overprojected relative to the brow and the infraorbital rim, but similar to controls relative to the lateral rim. The contralateral orbit had increased brow protrusion with decreased orbital height. The cornea was underprojected relative to the brow, but overprojected relative to the lateral orbital rim and similar to controls at the infraorbital rim. Three-dimensional comparison demonstrated significant overprojection of the contralateral brow, with some more mild and inconsistent underprojection of the lateral aspect of the ipsilateral brow.Key orbital and brow differences exist between the affected and unaffected sides in UCS. This study provides quantitative data that further characterize the orbital dysmorphology observed in UCS and identifies unique aspects of the diagnosis that should be taken into consideration during surgical planning.

A Cohort Study of Strabismus Rates Following Correction of the Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Deformity: Conventional Bilateral Fronto-Orbital Advancement Versus Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare perioperative morbidity and strabismus rates between traditional fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction (FOAR) and fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS).

METHOD

A consecutive group of 15 patients undergoing FODO for isolated UCS were compared to a contemporaneous group of 15 patients undergoing traditional FOAR for UCS. Patient age, operative time, blood loss, blood replacement, technical details of the surgery, length of stay, complications, and strabismus rates were documented and compared statistically using chi-square and Student t test with a significance value of 0.05.

RESULTS

The 15 patients undergoing FODO were younger (6.3 and 9.8 months, P < 0.05), experienced less operative time for the initial procedure (111 versus 190 minutes, P < 0.01), less blood loss (26% versus 50% of total blood volume, P < 0.01), and less blood replacement (40% versus 60% of total blood volume, P < 0.05). One patient in the FODO group experienced a new-onset strabismus postoperatively compared with 5 in the FOAR group (P < 0.05). There were no complications requiring a return to the operating room in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of isolated UCS is associated with a favorable perioperative morbidity profile and a decreased incidence of postoperative strabismus compared with traditional FOAR. These positive factors are tempered by the need for an additional procedure for removal of the device and lack of long-term outcomes data on the technique.

Long-term ophthalmic outcomes in 120 children with unilateral coronal synostosis: a 20-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior studies comparing ophthalmic outcomes after treating unicoronal synostosis (UCS) by early endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) versus later fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) are modest in sample size, or lack consistent age adjustment. We report long-term, age-adjusted ophthalmic outcomes for a large cohort after nonrandomized treatment by one of these two options.

METHODS

The following data was retrieved from a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with treated UCS born since 2000: cycloplegic refractions, sensorimotor examinations, and strabismus procedures before craniofacial repair and postoperatively at approximately 18 and 60 months of age. V-pattern strabismus was graded as mild (absent or + 1/-1 oblique dysfunction) versus moderate-to-severe (≥+2/-2 oblique dysfunction or left to right vertical alignment change of ≥20^Δ or ocular torticollis >15°).

RESULTS

A total of 120 infants were included: 60 treated by FOA and 60 by ESC. By the late examination, aniso-astigmatism was present in 72% of FOA-treated patients and 46% of ESC-treated patients (P < 0.0001). By late examination, the age-adjusted odds ratio of moderate-to-severe V-pattern strabismus after treatment by FOA versus ESC was 2.65 (95% CI, 1.37-6.28; P = 0.02); strabismus surgery was performed in 26 infants treated by FOA compared with 13 treated by ESC (OR = 2.8; P = 0.02). Amblyopia developed in 60% of FOA-treated patients compared with 35% of those treated by ESC (OR 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.7; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our age-adjusted ophthalmic results confirm better long-term outcomes after treatment of USC by endoscopic strip craniectomy. Recognition and referral of affected infants by the earliest months of life facilitates the opportunity for endoscopic repair.

Rotation flap distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal synostosis

Unicoronal craniosynostosis is notoriously difficult to treat, with long-term studies demonstrating high rates of relapse and the need for reoperation using open fronto-orbital advancement. Applying the principles of distraction osteogenesis to cranial vault remodeling has demonstrated promising short-term results that compare favorably with traditional methods, with simultaneous correction of both frontofacial and endocranial morphology, along with significant increases in intracranial volume. Here, the authors demonstrate their technique for rotation flap distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of unicoronal synostosis and provide case examples.

The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/519505008.

Pediatric Fronto-Orbital Skull Reconstruction

Craniofacial surgery in children is a highly challenging discipline that requires extensive knowledge of craniofacial anatomy and pathology. Insults to the fronto-orbital skeleton have the potential to inflict significant morbidity and even mortality in patients due to its proximity to the central nervous system. In addition, significant aesthetic and ophthalmologic disturbances frequently accompany these insults. Craniosynostosis, facial trauma, and craniofacial tumors are all pathologies that frequently affect the fronto-orbital region of the craniofacial skeleton in children. While the mechanisms of these pathologies vary greatly, the underlying principles of reconstruction remain the same. Despite the limited data in certain areas of fronto-orbital reconstruction in children, significant innovations have greatly improved its safety and efficacy. It is imperative that further investigations of fronto-orbital reconstruction are undertaken so that craniofacial surgeons may provide optimal care for these patients.

Use of Onlay Hydroxyapatite Cement for Secondary Cranioplasty

BACKGROUND

Children who undergo bi-fronto-orbital advancement (BFOA) frequently develop a contour deformity on the temporal and supra-orbital region, with an incidence reported as high as 55% and 75%, respectively. Up to 20% of patients may require correction. Hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) is a good alternative to autogenous tissue. The available literature on its use focusses on the reconstruction of bone defects, but little has been published on its efficacy and safety as an onlay graft over intact cranium.

OBJECTIVES

To describe our institution's experience with HAC in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from 1998 to 2018 on all patients from the Craniofacial Unit at the Sydney Children's Hospital who had either coronal or metopic craniosynostosis and underwent BFOA and later in life required cranioplasty with HAC for contour repair.

FINDINGS

We have performed 166 BFOA and nineteen secondary cranioplasties for contour repair using onlay HAC. The mean age at the time of operation was 14 years. Bi-coronal craniosynostosis was most frequently associated with secondary cranioplasty and 37% had an associated syndrome. The mean volume of HAC used was 37 mL. There was only 1 patient who had a complication (5.3%) and required partial removal of allograft. The mean length of admission was 2 days. Mean follow up time of 22.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HAC represents a safe option when used correctly, with low rates of complication and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes.

Test-retest validation of a cranial deformity index in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) affects many infants resulting in abnormalities affecting the forehead and orbits. As a result, the deformity caused by UCS is very noticeable and there are several surgical treatment options available to normalize the head shape. However, there is a lack of consistently used outcome measures, resulting in difficulty assessing surgical outcomes and on-going debate over optimal treatments. Current techniques to quantify deformity in UCS are cumbersome, provide limited information, or are based on subjective assessments. In this study, a cranial deformity index was developed to quantify abnormality at the frontal bones for UCS that is accessible, user-friendly, and generates objective surface distance measurements. The cranial deformity index is defined as the Euclidean distance at the point of the largest deviation between the deformed skull compared to a reference skull. In addition, the index was successfully used to quantify post-operative changes in a single case of UCS that underwent corrective surgery. The reproducibility of the index was assessed using test-retest reliability and was demonstrated to be highly reproducible (ICC = 0.93). A user-friendly measurement index that is based on open-source software may be a valuable tool for surgical teams. In addition, this information can augment the consultation experience for patients and their families.

Trends in Utilization of Virtual Surgical Planning in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery

INTRODUCTION

While the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has been well described in the adult craniofacial literature, there has been little written about pediatric uses or trends. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the evolving utilization of VSP for pediatric craniofacial procedures.

METHODS

The authors' prospective institutional review board-approved craniofacial registry was queried for index craniofacial procedures from January 2011 through December 2018. Data was collected regarding utilization of traditional surgical planning versus VSP, as well as the extent of VSP's influence on the operative procedure. These data were analyzed for trends over time and compared using appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 1131 index craniofacial cases were performed, of which 160 cases (14.1%) utilized VSP. Utilization of VSP collectively increased over time, from 2.0% in 2011 to 18.6% in 2018 (P < 0.001). Utilization rates of VSP varied across procedures from 0% of craniosynostosis cases and fronto-orbital advancement cases to 67% of osteocutaneous free tissue transfers (P < 0.001). The most profound contributor to increase in VSP utilization was orthognathic surgery, utilized in 0% of orthognathic procedures in 2011 to 68.3% of orthognathic procedures in 2018 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of virtual surgical planning for pediatric craniofacial procedures is increasing, especially for complex orthognathic procedures and osteocutaneous free tissue transfers. Utilization patterns of individual components of the VSP system demonstrate unique footprints across the spectrum of craniofacial procedures, which reinforces the specific and variable benefits of this workflow for treating pediatric craniofacial disorders.

Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public

Study Design

A two-alternative forced choice design was used to gather perceptual data regarding unicoronal synostosis (UCS).

Objective

Cranial vault remodeling aims at improving the aesthetic appearance of infants with UCS by reshaping the forehead and reducing the potential for psychosocial discrimination. People's perception of craniofacial deformity plays a role in the stigma of deformity. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS patients and laypersons' perception of skull normality.

Methods

Forty layperson skull raters were recruited from the general public. Skull raters were asked to categorize 45 infant skull images as normal or abnormal. Twenty-one of the images were UCS skulls, and 24 were normal skulls. Skulls were displayed briefly on a computer to simulate a first impression scenario and generate a perceptual response. A χ ² analysis and mixed-effects regression model were used to analyze the response data.

Results

Members of the general public were good at distinguishing between skull groups, χ ² (1) = 281.97, P < .001. In addition, skull raters' responses were predicted by the severity of deformity in the UCS skulls (b = -0.10, z = -2.6, P = .010, CI: -0.18, -0.02). A skull with a deformity value of 2.8 mm (CI: 1.8, 4.1) was equally likely to be rated normal or abnormal.

Conclusions

This is the first study to investigate the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS and public perception. Laypersons were good at distinguishing the difference between normal and UCS skulls, and their perceptions of normality were predicted by the degree of skull deformity.

Strabismus in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Effect of Orbital Dysmorphology and Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine what craniometric changes occur to both orbits of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, and which of these changes are associated with new onset of postoperative strabismus.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of the preoperative and postoperative orbits of 24 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients and the orbits of 24 control subjects, totaling 144 orbits. Eight parameters were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. One of the parameters was modified orbital index, an indicator of severity of harlequin deformity.

RESULTS

Significant differences in orbital dimensions and angles were present bilaterally in unicoronal craniosynostosis orbits when compared to controls. Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling increased the ipsilateral unicoronal craniosynostosis orbital volume from 13,184 ± 2003 mm to 16,220 ± 2323 mm (p < 0.001). Ipsilateral horizontal cone angles were increased from 48 ± 5 degrees to 54 ± 7 degrees (p = 0.004). Ipsilateral vertical cone angles were decreased from 73 ± 8 degrees to 66 ± 10 degrees (p = 0.003). Ipsilateral modified orbital index improved from 0.83 ± 0.06 to 0.88 ± 0.06 (p = 0.003). Three of the 19 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients developed transient postoperative strabismus. Logistic regression analysis displayed a strong significant association between new-onset strabismus and a change in modified orbital index with a coefficient of 30.84 ± 14.51 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal craniosynostosis is bilateral in nature, and it is not wholly treated with conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The severity of ipsilateral orbital dysmorphology is correlated with the incidence of postoperative strabismus following conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Future research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate the risk of development of strabismus in this group of patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a condition in which 2 or more of the skull bones fuse prematurely. The spectrum of the disorder most commonly involves the closure of a single suture in the skull, but it can also involve syndromic diagnoses in which multiple skull bones and/or bones outside of the cranium are affected. Craniosynostosis can result in cosmetic deformity as well as potential limitations in brain growth and development, and the neurocognitive impact of the condition is just starting to be studied more thoroughly. Our knowledge regarding the genetics of this condition has also evolved substantially. In this review, the authors explore the medical and surgical advancements in understanding and treating this condition over the past century, with a focus on how the diagnosis and treatment have evolved.

METHODS

In this review article, the authors, who are the leaders of a craniofacial team at a major academic pediatric hospital, focus on single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) affecting the 6 major cranial sutures and discuss the evolution of the treatment of SSC from its early history in modern medicine through the current state of the art and future trends. This discussion is based on the authors' broad experience and a comprehensive review of the literature.

SUMMARY

The management of SSC has evolved substantially over the past 100 years. There have been major advances in technology and medical knowledge that have allowed for safer treatment of this condition through the use of newer techniques and technologies in the fields of surgery, anesthesia, and critical care. The use of less invasive surgical techniques along with other innovations has led to improved outcomes in SSC patients. The future of SSC treatment will likely be guided by elucidation of the causes of neurocognitive delay in these children and assessment of how the timing and type of surgery can mitigate adverse outcomes.