Prospective, Double-Blind Evaluation of Umbilicoplasty Techniques Using Conventional and Crowdsourcing Methods:

Crowdsourced Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes of Traditional Transverse Versus Skin-Reducing Mastectomy Incision Patterns Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Introduction Advancements in reconstructive breast surgery have made postoperative cosmesis and patient satisfaction critical outcome measures. Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) incision patterns may be classified into the traditional transverse incision, or skin-reducing patterns. The aim of this study is to identify preferential trends among the public regarding aesthetic outcomes between incision patterns following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Methods Twelve patients who underwent IBBR following SSM were included, six with a transverse incision pattern, and six with skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) patterns. Patients were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification system, comorbidities, Regnault ptosis grade, and chemotherapy/radiation status. A survey was created via the Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) database to assess outcomes in seven categories: symmetry, volume, projection, shape, skin quality, scar pattern, and overall aesthetic rating. The survey was distributed via social media and the Amazon MTurk crowdsourcing platform. Results The survey collected 1,194 responses, predominantly from females under 40 years of age, with a balanced distribution of respondents with and without healthcare experience. Across all assessed categories, SRM patterns were rated more favorably than transverse incisions (p < 0.001). Notably, SRM patterns were preferred in scenarios involving nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction. Conclusions The SRM was found to be more aesthetically pleasing to the general public regardless of age, gender, or healthcare experience. These results should be considered when planning incision patterns for patients undergoing mastectomy.

Comparison of Aesthetic Results of Mercedes-Y Versus Inverted-V Incision for Umbilical Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The appearance and position of navel which are considered as a marker for overall abdominal aesthetics, are important for the final results of abdominal surgeries. However, reconstructing and improving its appearance have been a challenge in plastic surgery.

HYPOTHESIS

In this study, we aimed to compare satisfaction of the patients and the plastic surgery professors with the aesthetic results of the two methods of umbilical reconstruction: Mercedes (Y) incision versus inverted-V incision.

METHODS

This is a randomized clinical trial performed on umbilicoplasty patients following abdominoplasty, breast reconstruction, or abdominal flap surgery whom referred to our center. They were divided into two equal groups of twenty patients with Mercedes (Y) incision and patients with inverted-V incision. The results of surgery were compared three months after the surgery by the opinions of patients, plastic surgery professors, and unbiased observers.

RESULTS

The average scores of patients, professors, and observers showed that Mercedes (Y) had significantly higher scores compared to inverted-V incision in terms of position, size, shape, natural appearance, and the overall satisfaction. Surgical complications including stenosis, necrosis, and wound dehiscence were not statistically different in our small sample size.

CONCLUSION

In this study, Mercedes (Y) incision was preferred by all of the groups in all five parameters that were assessed including size, shape, position, natural appearance, and overall satisfaction. The simplicity of the Y incision with less visible scar makes it a suitable method for further investigations with a larger sample size. Level of Evidence I This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Aesthetic Evaluation and Validation: Umbilicus Reconstruction after DIEP Flap

BACKGROUND

 The most common method for autologous breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. The umbilicus can be managed in various ways, including re-inset, neoumbilicus, and umbilectomy without reconstruction. This study evaluated the aesthetic differences in umbilicus reconstruction choice and variation in patients' postoperative satisfaction with their abdomen.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of 1,019 patients treated with DIEP flap breast reconstruction between August 2009 and January 2022 was conducted. Patients were stratified by management of the umbilicus: preservation and re-inset of the native umbilicus, umbilectomy with delayed reconstruction, and umbilectomy with no reconstruction. A crowdsourced survey was created to assess the aesthetic preference of each photograph using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

 There were 1,063 responses to the umbilicus preference crowd source survey. Patients who had delayed umbilicus reconstruction after umbilectomy were rated to be significantly more attractive (4.397 ± 1.697) than both preservation of the native umbilicus (4.176 ± 1.669) and lack of the umbilicus (3.994 ± 1.733; p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). In an analysis of the BREAST-Q scores, delayed reconstruction patients had a similar change across measures when compared to the re-inset group. The delayed group had a significantly higher change in overall satisfaction and well-being with abdomen when compared with the no reconstruction group (p = 0.006 and 0.027, respectively).

CONCLUSION

 This study demonstrates that umbilectomy with delayed reconstruction yields a significantly higher aesthetic rating and comparable patient satisfaction when compared to re-inset of the umbilicus.

Long-term cosmetic outcomes of the slit-slide procedure for umbilical hernia repair in children

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term cosmetic outcomes of the "slit-slide procedure", designed to provide a more natural appearance for umbilical hernia repair, as perceived by the patients and their parents.

METHODS

A total of 149 patients with umbilical hernia underwent the slit-slide procedure at our hospital. The slit-slide procedure allows for the creation of an umbilicus with a more natural and integrated appearance. The patient satisfaction survey questionnaire was mailed to the families (n = 139), and there were 74 (53.2%) respondents. A questionnaire survey on postoperative appearance was also distributed to pediatric surgeons.

RESULTS

The median age at the time of operation was 2.5 years (range, 2 months to 14 years) and the average median age at the time of answering the questionnaire was 6.25 years old (range, 2.5-14.8 years). The average median period of observation was 3.2 years (range, 4 months to 8.97 years). Most patients (89.2%) and parents (93.2%) were satisfied with the appearance of the umbilicus. Twenty-seven patients reported improved satisfaction after surgery (36.2%). Surgeons tended to score the elongated-oval shape highly; however, there was no difference in satisfaction among the shapes.

CONCLUSION

The slit-slide procedure is not only effective and safe, but it achieves a satisfactory aesthetic outcome.

Indications, outcomes, and complications of neoumbilical reconstruction: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoumbilicoplasty aims to reconstruct an aesthetically pleasing new umbilicus following agenesis, malignancy, anatomical distortion, or umbilicus loss. Despite the wide variety of surgical techniques described, literature is scarce when it comes to standardized categorization of these as well as the clear definition of patients' selections, specific indications, final outcomes, and possible complications. According to available literature, this work aims to evaluate different surgical approaches, and correlate them to specific surgical needs, to simplify the surgical choice and patient management.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in December 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies and 588 patients were finally included. On the basis of the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the studies into four groups according to the neoumbilicoplasty techniques: single suture or purse-string suture, single flap, multiple flap, and skin graft. Patients' surgical comorbidities, neoumbilicoplasty indications, and aesthetic and surgical outcomes were investigated. Direct suture and single and multiple flap techniques assured overall, satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications. Whereas suture-only techniques were chosen mostly by general surgeons/urologists in laparoscopic surgery, the single flap was the preferred method to reconstruct the umbilicus in open abdominal surgery or combined abdominoplasty with herniorrhaphy. Multiple flap and skin grafts were adopted in abdominoplasty-related umbilicus reconstruction, although the latter option showed impactful aesthetic and surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Umbilicoplasty can assure generally pleasant aesthetic outcomes with relatively low complication rates. Indications for specific techniques correspond to different patient populations and surgical scenarios.

Which Factors Are Important to Women When Choosing a Breast Reconstruction Surgeon?

BACKGROUND

Women undergoing breast reconstruction often research their health care provider options. The authors studied which factors may influence how a woman selects a plastic surgeon for breast reconstruction surgery.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed by means of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk; Amazon Web Services, Inc., Seattle, Wash.) to 1025 adult women. Participants were asked to imagine a scenario in which they had breast cancer, needed to undergo mastectomy, and were choosing a reconstructive surgeon. They were then asked to rank factors influencing this decision on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Two-sample t tests were used to compare Likert scores between dichotomized categories based on participant characteristics.

RESULTS

Women assigned the highest scores [mean (standard deviation)] to online reviews on Vitals or WebMD [6.1 (1.2)], years of experience [5.7 (1.4)], recommendations from another surgeon [5.7 (1.3)] or family/friend [4.9 (1.7)], and attending a top medical school [4.7 (1.7)]. Lowest ranked factors were online advertising and surgeon demographics, including having a sex concordant (female) surgeon. After amalgamation into attribute subsections, mean (standard deviation) rated relative importance of surgeon reputation [0.72 (0.13)] was higher than that of appearance [0.46 (0.19)] and demographics [0.31 (0.13)]. Patient demographics influenced relative importance of certain attributes; older, educated, and higher-income patients placed higher value on surgeon appearance (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

When selecting a breast reconstruction surgeon, women place the highest value on surgeons' online, educational, and personal reputations. Though most show no strong preferences for surgeon demographics or physical attributes, specific features may be important for some patients. Cognizance of these preferences may enable providers to more effectively understand patient expectations.

US Public's Perceptions of Online Transformation Photos

BACKGROUND

Although many plastic surgeons seek to optimize their online presence and reach a broader patient base, no studies to our knowledge have evaluated the general public's perceptions of one of the most valued informational tools: transformation photos.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the general public's preferences for viewing transformation photos online.

METHODS

Respondents representative of the US public, crowdsourced through Amazon Mechanical Turk, answered a survey assessing perceptions of the posting of before-and-after photos.

RESULTS

One thousand respondents completed the questionnaire. Ninety percent (905/1000) of respondents are willing to view online before-and-after photos. Sixty-three percent (634/1000) would consent to online posting of before-and-after photos of at least 1 body area, with comfort levels highest for facelift (36.4%), nonoperative facial rejuvenation (31.9%), liposuction (24.9%), and abdominoplasty (23.2%). Breast reduction (12.4%), breast reconstruction (10.9%), gluteal augmentation (14.0%), and vaginal rejuvenation (4.4%) are considered least acceptable for public posting. Respondents are significantly more opposed to online viewing of genitals than any other body area (P < 0.0001). Of those willing to have their own transformation photos posted online, 74.0% would allow posting on professional practice websites, 35.1% on Instagram, 26.6% on Facebook, 17.2% on Twitter, and 10.7% on Snapchat. Significantly more respondents prefer their transformation photos reside only on professional practice websites rather than on a social media platform (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The public considers aesthetic facial procedures and body contouring most acceptable for showcasing transformation photos online. Although most respondents prefer viewing these photos on professional practice websites, Instagram is the favored social media platform. The majority of the public seek transformation photos when choosing a plastic surgeon for a cosmetic procedure.

A Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes of Umbilicoplasty in Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Flap: Inverted-U Versus Vertical Oval Incision

BACKGROUND

The umbilicus is a key aesthetic unit of the abdominal wall. It contributes to the natural curvature of the abdomen and is now considered as one of the most important factors in the overall results and patient satisfaction. In this study, we present an inverted-U incisional technique for umbilicoplasty. This study aims to describe the senior author's approach to umbilicoplasty and compare the aesthetic outcomes of the inverted-U method with those of the vertical oval incisional technique.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed a total of 109 patients including 51 who underwent umbilicoplasty with the inverted-U incisional technique and 58 who had surgery with the vertical oval incisional method. With the description of our operative technique, the aesthetic outcomes of both techniques were compared by two independent surgeons using a 5-point Likert scale in terms of shape, size, depth, natural appearance and periumbilical scarring. Also, the total scores of the five items were calculated to give a final score for each patient (range, from 5 to 25 points).

RESULTS

On all measured parameters, the inverted-U incisional technique produced favorable outcomes compared with the vertical oval incisional technique. Also, the inverted-U incisional technique was given significantly higher total scores than was the vertical oval incisional technique (inverted-U 14.73 ± 2.47 vs. vertical oval 11.26 ± 3.02, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, an inverted-U incisional technique produced significantly favorable outcomes in terms of shape, size, depth, natural appearance and overall score compared to a vertical oval incision (p < 0.05). We believe that this technique enables surgeons to achieve a better shape, natural retrusive appearance and superior hood.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

In this study, an inverted-U incisional technique produced significantly favorable outcomes in terms of shape, size, depth, natural appearance and overall score compared to a vertical oval incision (p < 0.05). We believe that this technique enables surgeons to achieve a better shape, natural retrusive appearance and superior hood.

Atypical Outcomes of Nasal and Lip Appearance After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Judgment by Professionals, Patients, and Laypeople

Objective:

To gain more insight into the assessment of “atypical” nasal and lip appearance outcomes compared to “typical” appearance outcomes after unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) repair, when judged by professionals, patients with repaired UCLP, and laypeople.

Design:

An online survey containing 3 series of photographs with various degrees of “typical” and “atypical” nasal and lip appearance outcomes after UCLP repair was sent to 30 professionals, 30 patients with repaired UCLP, and 50 laypeople in 2 countries. Participants were instructed to rank the photographs from excellent to poor based on overall appearance. Mean rank positions of photographs were analyzed and differences in mean rank score between “typical” and “atypical” results were assessed using a T-test. Agreement of ranking between the 3 groups was assessed with an analysis of variance analysis.

Setting:

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Netherlands and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, USA.

Patients:

Photographs of 6- to 18-year-old patients with repaired UCLP.

Results:

“Atypical” appearance outcomes were ranked significantly less favorably (small nostril: P = 0.00; low vermillion border: P = 0.02; whistling deformity: P = 0.00) compared to “typical” outcomes. Difference between professionals, patients and laypeople in rank positioning the photographs was not statistically significant (P = 0.89).

Conclusions:

Noses with a smaller nostril and lips containing a whistling deformity were perceived as poorer outcome compared to the “typical” results. Professionals, patients, and laypeople are in agreement when assessing these outcomes.

[Shape and aesthetic outcome evaluation of transposed umbilicus according to four surgical procedures]

INTRODUCTION

In abdominal plastic surgery, umbilicus is frequently transposed, generating scars and shapes variating with the techniques used. Various umbilical transposition techniques have been described, all of them attempt to reproduce the "ideal" umbilicus. This study aimed to define the shape and the aesthetic results obtained with four different surgical procedures, in order to choose an "ideal" umbilical transposition technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the characteristics of transposed umbilicus, in 50 patients who had undergone abdominal dermolipectomy for aesthetic reason, after a loss of weight or in breast reconstruction by Deep-Inferior-Epigastric-Perforator. Four surgical procedures were chosen, which differed by their counter-incision shape in the abdominal flap (Y, inverted Y, de-epidermized round with horizontal incision or U), and the deep points position of umbilical docking (along a horizontal or vertical axis). Shape and depth were evaluated by a panel of experts. The global assessment was based on a double evaluation, by the surgical jury and the patients themselves.

RESULTS

The counter-incision type determined the umbilicus shape: triangular for the Y (60%) or inverted-Y (41%), round for the U (52%) and vertical oval (67%) or round (32%) for the de-epidermized circle. The deep points position influenced the umbilicus axis. Regarding the appreciation, the de-epidermized circle had the best results for surgeons in a significant way, and for patients (respectively 72% and 100% satisfied), followed by the inverted-Y (57% and 92%) and Y techniques (55% and 89%) and at last the U (50 and 75%).

CONCLUSION

Horizontal counter incision in a de-epidermized round, with two anchoring points on a vertical axis, generates vertical oval or round shaped umbilicus, considered attractive in the literature, and giving the highest aesthetic satisfaction for both surgeons and patients.

Facial Recognition Neural Networks Confirm Success of Facial Feminization Surgery

BACKGROUND

Male-to-female transgender patients desire to be identified, and treated, as female, in public and social settings. Facial feminization surgery entails a combination of highly visible changes in facial features. To study the effectiveness of facial feminization surgery, we investigated preoperative/postoperative gender-typing using facial recognition neural networks.

METHODS

In this study, standardized frontal and lateral view preoperative and postoperative images of 20 male-to-female patients who completed hard- and soft-tissue facial feminization surgery procedures were used, along with control images of unoperated cisgender men and women (n = 120 images). Four public neural networks trained to identify gender based on facial features analyzed the images. Correct gender-typing, improvement in gender-typing (preoperatively to postoperatively), and confidence in femininity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Cisgender male and female control frontal images were correctly identified 100 percent and 98 percent of the time, respectively. Preoperative facial feminization surgery images were misgendered 47 percent of the time (recognized as male) and only correctly identified as female 53 percent of the time. Postoperative facial feminization surgery images were gendered correctly 98 percent of the time; this was an improvement of 45 percent. Confidence in femininity also improved from a mean score of 0.27 before facial feminization surgery to 0.87 after facial feminization surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first study of its kind, facial recognition neural networks showed improved gender-typing of transgender women from preoperative facial feminization surgery to postoperative facial feminization surgery. This demonstrated the effectiveness of facial feminization surgery by artificial intelligence methods.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

The Public's Preferences on Plastic Surgery Social Media Engagement and Professionalism: Demystifying the Impact of Demographics

BACKGROUND

Social media discussions are alive among plastic surgeons. This article represents a primer on beginning to understand how the public would seek out plastic surgeons and how demographics shape their preferences.

METHODS

An anonymous 31-question survey was crowdsourced by means of MTurk.

RESULTS

There were a total of 527 respondents. Of these respondents, 33 percent follow plastic surgeons on social media, with those aged younger than 35 years 3.9 times more likely to do so. Google was the first place people would look for a plastic surgeon (46 percent). When asked what was the most influential of all online methods for selecting a surgeon, practice website ranked first (25 percent), but social media platforms ranked higher as a whole (35 percent). Those considering surgical or noninvasive procedures are thee times more likely to select social media platforms as the most influential online method in selecting a surgeon and five times more likely to follow a plastic surgeon on social media. The majority would prefer not seeing the surgeon's private life displayed on social media (39 percent). Respondents were evenly split regarding whether graphic surgical images would lead them to unfollow accounts. Ninety-six percent of the general public were unclear of the type of board certification a plastic surgeon should hold.

CONCLUSIONS

Clear differences in engagement and perception exist in the public based on age, sex, parental status, and reported country of origin. Social media will soon become a critical strategy in outreach and engagement and a valuable tool in clearing misconceptions within plastic surgery.

The Public Face of Rhinoplasty: Impact on Perceived Attractiveness and Personality

BACKGROUND

The authors assess the impact of rhinoplasty on public perception of a patient's appearance and personality.

METHODS

A survey was created using standardized before-and-after photographs of 10 Caucasian women who had undergone primary rhinoplasty. Photographs of two additional women who had not undergone facial surgery were randomly included as controls, for a total of 12 survey items. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were placed side by side. The survey was administered by means of crowd-sourcing. Respondents were asked to evaluate which photograph better represented 11 traits of appearance or personality, according to a seven-point Likert scale. A score of 1 meant the preoperative photograph was much better, 7 meant the postoperative photograph was much better, and 4 meant no difference. T tests and analyses of variance were used to evaluate rating changes for each trait and differences between demographic groups.

RESULTS

There were 264 responses received. Averaged scores across the 10 survey patients produced a value for each appearance or personality trait. In 10 of 11 categories (i.e., symmetry, youthfulness, facial harmony, likeability, trustworthiness, confidence, femininity, attractiveness, approachability, and intelligence), the postoperative photograph was significantly favorable compared with the preoperative photograph (p < 0.00001). The preoperative photograph was rated higher only in aggressiveness (p < 0.001). The same scores were calculated for the controls; no significant difference in any category was seen except confidence, where the right image was viewed as more confident (mean, 4.19; p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Aesthetic rhinoplasty improves the public perception of a person's appearance and personality in multiple aspects.