Changing Role of Septal Extension versus Columellar Grafts in Modern Rhinoplasty

Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Combined Use of Extended Spreader Graft and Septal Extension Graft

Deviation of the cartilaginous midvault and caudal nasal septum can cause both aesthetic misalignment and functional impairment of the nasal valves. This study explores the technical considerations and outcomes of combining extended spreader graft and septal extension graft in septorhinoplasty to correct these deviations. A retrospective analysis of 24 patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty between January 2022 and July 2023, performed by a single surgeon, was conducted with a mean follow-up of 11.28 months. Unilateral or bilateral extended spreader grafts and septal extension grafts were placed on the concave side of the deviation. Clinical charts, surgical records, standardized photographs, and acoustic rhinometry data were analyzed for objective and subjective outcomes. Among 24 patients (21 males, 3 females; mean age 35.2 ± 15.0 years), successful correction of C-shaped nasal deviation was achieved with no significant complications observed in the short-term follow-up (p < 0.0001). Functional improvements were observed in nasal volume and minimum cross-sectional area (p < 0.0001). Most patients reported high satisfaction with both functional and aesthetic outcomes. Compared to traditional septorhinoplasty techniques, this combined approach offers a structured method to address both cosmetic and functional concerns. These findings suggest that the combined use of extended spreader grafts and septal extension grafts offers a promising approach for addressing both cosmetic and functional concerns in septorhinoplasty.

Medial crural footplate crease approach for columellar strut graft placement in closed rhinoplasty

The placement of a columellar cartilage strut graft (CSG) between the medial cartilage crura is an important step for providing tip projection and support in rhinoplasty. While the CSG is placed by direct observation in open rhinoplasty, it can be placed with different approaches in closed rhinoplasty: by dissection from the mucosal side, delivery technique, marginal or lateral incisions from the edge of the columella, direct skin incisions over the columella, or incisions made through the intraoral mucosa. This study suggests the placement of the CSG through a medial crus footplate crease incision as an alternative approach in closed rhinoplasty. A septal cartilage graft is harvested and fashioned into a 16-22 mm long CSG for later insertion. A 3-mm incision is made at the junction of the nasal floor and the lip, at the level of the lower end of the right medial crural footplate. A minimal dissection is performed between the medial crura to the tip using a blunt periosteal elevator, following which the CSG is inserted. This procedure is easy and provides adequate support for the columella and tip without prolonging the operation time. The scar is hidden in the natural fold and heals very well.

Management of the Posthemangioma Nose: 5 Key Rhinoplasty Components

SUMMARY

Hemangiomas of the nasal tip are a relatively uncommon presentation of a common tumor. While optimal medical and surgical management of nasal tip infantile hemangiomas has been described and debated extensively in the literature, to our knowledge, there is no report of secondary aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty in these patients at skeletal maturity, until now. This special topic article provides an excellent example of the 5 key technical elements to revision rhinoplasty in the skeletally mature patient with a history of nasal tip infantile hemangioma.

Wide-Based Columellar Strut Graft: A Novel Boost for Enhanced Nasal Tip Support in Ethnic and Revision Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Adequate nasal tip support is crucial for achieving both aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty. This study introduces a wide-based columellar strut graft (WB-columellar strut graft) as a new modification to provide enhanced support for the nasal tip, especially in challenging ethnic and revision rhinoplasty cases.

OBJECTIVE

To present and evaluate the effectiveness of the WB-columellar strut graft in providing sufficient nasal tip support and achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes in patients with ethnic noses, Asian noses, and revision rhinoplasty cases presenting with weak caudal septum or anterior nasal spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients, aged between 17 and 48, were included in this study. Of these, 11 were revision cases, 12 had ethnic noses, and nine had Asian noses. The technique involved preparing a WB-columellar strut graft in two different ways according to the need of particular case. WB-columellar strut graft-1: Constructed from either costal or septal cartilage, with a widened columellar base using bilateral grafts and a columellar strut graft. WB-columellar strut graft-2: Exclusively from costal cartilage, featuring a groove on the anterior surface for insertion of a columellar strut graft to form a wide-based structure. The grafts were applied to provide robust support in cases, where the caudal septum and spine were excessively resected.

RESULTS

In 25 patients, the graft was prepared from costal cartilage, while in seven patients it was from septal cartilage. The WB-columellar strut graft-1 modification was used in 22 patients, and the WB-columellar strut graft-2 in 10 patients. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months, with only one case requiring a mini-revision due to visible tip graft. No significant complications were reported in other patients.

CONCLUSION

The WB-columellar strut graft is an effective boost for enhancing nasal tip support in ethnic and revision rhinoplasty cases. It provides a more robust structural foundation, leading to long-lasting and satisfactory aesthetic results. This technique is particularly beneficial for patients with retracted caudal septum and weak anterior nasal spine, providing improved nasal tip projection and rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Role of Rib Graft for Tip Shaping in Primary Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Case Series of 30 Patients

BACKGROUND

In primary rhinoplasty, use of harvested septal cartilage often precludes the need for rib graft. Nonetheless, there are a number of indications for the use of rib graft in primary rhinoplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify the indications and techniques for rib graft use in primary rhinoplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon over a 5-year period. From these patients, those who required the use of fresh frozen allograft rib cartilage were identified. Medical record review was performed to identify demographics, ethnicity, and history of nasal trauma. Photographic analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Thirty of 638 consecutive primary rhinoplasties (4.7%) required rib graft. Of these, 7 patients (23.3%) demonstrated a history of nasal trauma. Furthermore, a high proportion of primary rhinoplasty patients requiring rib graft were from Asian ( n = 7 [23.3%]), Middle Eastern ( n = 4 [13.3%]), Hispanic ( n = 7 [23.3%]), and African American ( n = 9 [30%]) backgrounds. White patients were in the minority ( n = 2 [6.7%]). All primary rhinoplasties using rib graft implemented a septal extension graft.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that patients requiring a rib graft in primary rhinoplasty invariably receive a septal extension graft. Furthermore, certain ethnicities associated anatomical characteristics correlated with the need for a rib graft for tip shaping. Ultimately, the use of a septal extension graft in primary rhinoplasty allows for precise and robust projection, rotation, and tip shaping in noses with thick skin, weak cartilaginous framework, and history of nasal trauma.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

A retrospective study on different kind of cartilage frameworks on Asian rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

The character of Asian nose usually presents low projection of tip, short columellar, and short nose, necessitating the construction of a cartilage framework to achieve optimal results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the structural characteristics, stability, and postoperative outcomes of the integrated fixed framework, 1+1 framework, 2+1 framework, 4+1 framework, and Y-shaped framework.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 612 patients who underwent rhinoplasty and were admitted between February 2017 and December 2022. According to rhinoplasty framework, the patients were categorized into fixed frameworks (integrated fixed framework group, 1+1 framework group, 2+1 framework group) or elastic frameworks(4+1 framework group, Y-shaped framework group). The stability of rhinoplasty frameworks was assessed by measuring nasal tip projection and nasolabial angle at both one and twelve months post-surgery. Postoperative follow-up included monitoring complications occurrence and evaluating patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was 25.23 months (rang from 24 to 54 months). The overall satisfaction rate reached 89.37 %(547/612), with the highest satisfaction rate observed in 2+1 framework group.Compared with the integrated fixed, 1+1, 2+1 framework group, the nasolabial angle and nasal tip projection of 4+1, and Y-shaped framework group decreased more obviously(P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal frameworks in Asians are generally classified as fixed frameworks or elastic frameworks. The stability of the fixed frameworks surpasses that of the elastic frameworks. The secure fixation of the strut to the anterior nasal spine can enhance the overall stability of the framework.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE STATEMENT

IV.

Nasal Tip Flexibility and Stability: Comparison of Septal Extension Grafts and Columellar Strut Grafts in a Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND

The stability of nasal tip rotation and projection, and providing a flexible nasal tip, are important elements in rhinoplasty. Two common options to provide these requirements are the septal extension graft (SEG) and the columellar strut graft (CSG). This study aims to compare nasal tip stability and flexibility between the 2 graft options.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study was carried out in 60 patients operated on with either the CSG or the SEG. Tip rotation and projection stability were analyzed with photographic evaluation at the immediate postoperative period, the first month, and the first year. Nasal tip flexibility was evaluated with a newton meter at the preoperative period and postoperative first, third, and sixth months and the first year.

RESULTS

The CSG showed a significant loss of projection and rotation, whereas the SEG showed better preservation of projection and rotation. However, both options showed a greater loss of projection and rotation in the first month and then a slight decrease in the following months. Although the SEG had lesser flexibility compared with the CSG anteroposteriorly, there was no flexibility difference between them in the lateral direction in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEG provides better nasal tip stability compared with the CSG. The greatest downside of the SEG is decreased flexibility compared with the CSG. Surgeons should be aware of the loss of projection and rotation with both graft options and adjust their operation plan according to these points.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Use of the Interalar Ligament Flap for Tip and Supratip Contouring in Primary Open Structural Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Precise tip contouring is paramount to achieve pleasant cosmetic results in rhinoplasty. Loss of tip projection or rotation, supratip deformities, and long-lasting edema may jeopardize the outcome and lead to patient dissatisfaction or to reintervention. Several approaches have been reported, sometimes with considerable drawbacks or conclusions supported mainly by experience. The aim of this study was to describe the interalar ligament flap for tip and supratip contouring and to comparatively assess its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The study included 147 patients who underwent primary structured open rhinoplasty and were divided into 2 groups: group 1 underwent harvesting and repositioning of the interalar ligament flap, and group 2 underwent conventional tip dissection. Tip edema, supratip definition, and fullness were blindly scored at 2-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up. Nasolabial angle was measured at 2 and 12 months postoperatively. Univariate analysis and multivariable regression modeling were performed.

RESULTS

Supratip definition was significantly higher in group 1 at the 2-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-up visits ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). Tip edema and supratip fullness were significantly lower in group 1 at each time point ( P < 0.01). Nasolabial angle, and its modification between 2 and 12 months after intervention, did not differ in the 2 groups. All findings were confirmed when controlled for eventual confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

The interalar ligament flap has proven to be versatile, effective, and consistently reliable in reducing tip edema and improving supratip definition. It may be tailored to the patient, partially folded to improve tip projection, or used to camouflage tip grafts.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Reconstruction of Scroll and Pitanguy's Ligaments in Open Rhinoplasty: A Controlled Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

In the preservation rhinoplasty era, ligament management represents a hot topic. The aim of this study is to analyze the role of ligaments as indispensable elements of support of the nasal tip to have an adequate, safe, and predictable aesthetic and functional result.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients meeting the following criteria were included in the study: primary rhinoplasty, minimum 2-year follow-up, proficiency in Italian language, signed consent, and standardized pre- and postoperative photographic documentation. The study was performed with a double-blinded randomized design; both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. All patients were asked to answer the FACE-Q satisfaction with the nose postoperative scale. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all postoperative photographs, rating the outcome on a 1-5 VAS scale.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled, 47 males and 65 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. Patients were randomly divided in three groups: group 1, ligament reconstruction and grafts; group 2, only grafts (shield, single and double onlay, umbrella); and group 3, only ligament reconstruction with columellar strut. All rhinoplasties were performed with an open approach. Both the FACE-Q and VAS scores were in groups 1 and 2, which were also the ones undergoing fewer secondary procedures compared to group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The best surgical option appears to be the combination of ligament repair and grafts. It reduces dead space and enables a better redraping of soft tissues, obtaining a better control of tip projection, position, and rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Facial Feminization: Middle Third of the Face

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) as applied to the midfacial region targets modifications to the nasal and malar esthetic complexes. Although a global assessment is paramount in achieving desired functional results, most patients benefit from malar feminization in the form of bony and soft tissue augmentation, and nasal feminization in the form of reductive rhinoplasty. For patients with signs of aging, additional interventions in the form of rhytidectomy are powerful adjuncts to feminization. As with FFS techniques directed toward the upper and lower thirds, the overarching goal is to obtain complementary outcomes that enhance facial harmony and beauty.

Tip Support in the Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty: A Comparison of Septal Extension Graft and Columellar Strut Graft

BACKGROUND

We aimed to comparatively analyze nasal projection and rotation changes in patients that underwent secondary cleft rhinoplasty with a columellar strut graft (CSG) or septal extension graft (SEG).

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were randomly divided into two groups. Preoperative, intraoperative (immediate postoperative), postoperative 1-, 6- and 12-month profile view pictures were analyzed. The nasion (N), alar base-cheek junction (A), tip defining point (T), columella (C), and lips (L) were marked. The AT/AN ratio, NAT angle, Goode ratio, and columellar-labial angle (CLA) were measured.

RESULTS

Regarding tip projection, the AT/AN ratio was lower in CSG group compared to SEG group postoperatively. In CSG group, there was a significant progressive decrease in the AT/AN ratio, whereas in SEG group, it decreased until postoperative 6 month. Regarding tip rotation, the NAT angle was higher in CSG group postoperatively and increased progressively. In SEG group, the NAT angle was lower intraoperatively compared to the postoperative period, whereas it did not differ significantly in-between follow-ups. The Goode ratio was significantly lower in CSG group compared to SEG group postoperatively. In SEG group, the Goode ratio was significantly higher intraoperatively compared to the postoperative period, but it did not differ significantly in-between follow-ups. In CSG group, the Goode ratio decreased progressively. The CLA decreased in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Secondary cleft lip rhinoplasty is a distinct subgroup of rhinoplasty that necessitates stable and strong tip support. SEG provides more reliable and predictable long-term results in secondary cleft lip rhinoplasty than CSG.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Cog graft, a new septal extension graft for designing nasal tip rotation and projection in rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Adjusting the nasal tip rotation and tip projection according to the patient's face and wishes is a very important stage in rhinoplasty with the use of a cog graft positioning the tip point in the appropriate place is possible by adjusting the nose length, tip projection and tip rotation together.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to facilitate positioning the tip rotation and projection in the appropriate place according to the patient's needs in rhinoplasty with Cog graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cog graft was applied in 32 patients who underwent rhinoplasty. Cog graft was prepared from costal cartilage in 10 patients and from septal cartilage in 22 patients. Cog graft was prepared by shaping the superior edge of the septal extension graft like a gear wheel. It is fixed to provide desired projection to the caudal septum. In the position where rotation and projection are evaluated adequately, the graft is fixed with sutures. They were followed in average 18 months (between 6 and 24 months).

RESULTS

Twenty of the patients were primary cases and 12 were revision cases. The targeted rotation and projection results were achieved in all patients. All patients had satisfactory esthetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Cog graft is a useful graft with which we can adjust the nose length, projection and rotation appropriately and in a short time with a single graft.

Long-Term Control of Nasal Tip Position: Quantitative Assessment of Caudal Septal Extension Graft

BACKGROUND

Control of nasal tip position is critical to final rhinoplasty outcomes. Two frequent methods of exerting tip control are columellar strut and caudal septal extension graft (SEG). Past work has demonstrated that SEG are better able to preserve tip position. However, there is no quantitative data describing long-term projection and rotation. The purpose of this study was to analyze long-term maintenance of tip projection and rotation following SEG.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult patients undergoing open rhinoplasty was conducted. Three-dimensional photogrammetric evaluation of nasal tip position was performed. Anthropometric points were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcome variables were tip projection, tip rotation, and nasal length.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included with an average follow-up time of 3.3 years (2.0 - 6.6 years). From postoperative week 1 to 6, there was a statistically significant decrease in rotation (-4.3%, p<0.01). There were no statistically significant decreases in projection, rotation, or nasal length from 6 weeks postoperative to 2 years postoperative, or from 6 weeks postoperative to final follow-up (2.0 - 6.6 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal tip projection and rotation appear to decrease from the immediate postoperative position, likely due to resolving edema. In this study, patients that underwent open rhinoplasty with SEG experienced modest loss of projection and rotation until 6 weeks postoperative, but projection and rotation were maintained from 6 weeks postoperative to 2 years and beyond. This study provides evidence that SEG maintains long-term changes in tip projection and rotation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Beyond Alar Base Resection: Contouring of the Alar Rim and Base

SUMMARY

Alar base surgery is approached with hesitancy and is often avoided by many surgeons because of inexperience and a lack of understanding. However, with a thorough knowledge of the anatomy and dynamic nature of the lower third of the nose, alar base resection can achieve favorable and reproducible results. Beyond correcting alar flare, an appropriately diagnosed and performed alar base procedure serves to contour both the alar rim and the alar base. The following article presents a case series of 436 consecutive rhinoplasties from a single surgeon, 214 of which underwent alar base surgery. The outcomes demonstrate that the procedure is safe and yields desirable results without a single revision being required. As the third in a series of three articles on alar base surgery by the senior author (R.J.R.), this article unifies the management of the alar base. An intuitive approach to the classification and management of alar flare and the implications of alar base surgery on contouring of the alar base and alar rim is presented.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Modified Drilled Extended Spreader Grafts in Asian Rhinoplasty: Clinical Application and Histopathological Analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended Spreader Grafts (ESGs) are widely used for both esthetic and functional purpose in rhinoplasty. This study aims to examine the effects of drilling on ESGs in rhinoplasty and their clinical benefits, as well as to analyze their histologic characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing esthetic rhinoplasty using drilled ESGs with autologous costal cartilage by a senior surgeon from January 2018 to April 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included, with a mean follow-up period of 26 months. Revision operations were performed on 4 patients. The phenomenon of tissue ingrowth from the septum mucoperichondrium to the septal cartilage through the holes of the drilled ESGs was observed in all 4 patients. Specimens of the ingrown tissue were taken from 3 patients during their revision surgeries. Vascular structures and connective tissue were observed in the specimens after fixation, paraffin embedding, and staining with hematoxylin-eosin. No other complications were observed except for 2 cases presenting cartilage warping after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Application of the drilled ESGs is a simple but effective approach, which has 3 significant advantages in rhinoplasty: enhancing the stability of the cartilaginous framework through connective tissue ingrowth, preserving the septal cartilage, and providing septum vitality by allowing the formation of vascular structures between the perichondrium and the septal cartilage; reducing the probability of warping in early stages through release the tension force of the cartilage itself.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Effect of septal extension graft on nasal tip support: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Septal extension graft (SEG) is an effective method to control the projection, rotation, and shape of the nasal tip. However, the structural mechanics of SEG have not yet been adequately determined.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of SEG parameters on nasal tip support using finite element analysis.

METHODS

A multicomponent nasal model was constructed from a computed tomographic scan. A control model without graft and a total of 15 models with different SEGs were created, regarding the direction, length, width, and piece of SEG. The nasal tip compression was simulated to analyze the von Mises stress, reaction force, and strain energy of the tip structure.

RESULTS

The SEG increased the max stress, reaction force, and strain energy of the nasal tip compared to the normal control. The SEG perpendicular to the nasal dorsum resulted in the highest maximum stress, reaction force, and strain energy for the same size of SEG. With the length increasing from 15 × 8 × 1 mm to 25 × 8 × 1 mm, the reaction force remained relatively stable, but the stress on the graft reduced significantly. Adding the width and pieces of the SEG increased the reaction force and strain energy of the tip.

CONCLUSION

The placement of SEG can strengthen the nasal tip support. The direction, length, width, and piece of SEG have an impact on the mechanics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, III.

Surgical Pearls: Combined Septal Extension-Columellar Strut Graft for Rhinoplasty

Importance: The nasal tip projection, rotation, and support are essential components to address during rhinoplasty surgery. Objective: To describe a novel combined septal extension-columellar strut autologous cartilage graft for use in rhinoplasty to control tip projection, shape, and rotation while restoring strength to the nasal tip. Design: Surgical pearls-description of a novel surgical technique. Setting: An academic practice. Participants: Patients who underwent the operation.

The advanced concepts for septal l-strut re-designing in septorhinoplasty for better strength and stability by considering of center of gravity

PURPOSE

This study contributes to the multidisciplinary understanding of septal L-strut reshaping and introduces innovative surgical design concepts based on engineering principles of static equilibrium. The objective is to enhance structural strength and stability, ultimately leading to improved surgical outcomes.

METHOD

Finite element analysis is employed to model the three-dimensional septal cartilage in septoplasty. A significant contribution of this work is the introduction of an innovative redesigns for the septal L-strut structure. These redesigns represent the first-ever attempt to incorporate the center of gravity theory into the modeling of the septal L-strut.

RESULTS

Our findings emphasize the significance of attaining a lower center of gravity in the design of the septal L-strut, as it contributes to optimal core strength and stability. To achieve this, we recommend widening the caudal septum and shaping the interior fillet corner to its maximum size, taking into account its specific shape. Notably, the utilization of a standard 20x20 mm septal L-strut, the C-shaped technique, and the septal support graft technique provide superior strength due to enhanced basement support.

CONCLUSION

To enhance surgical outcomes in septal L-strut procedures, design modifications are proposed to improve strength and stability, resulting in optimized performance. Recommendations include widening the caudal septum and incorporating fillet shapes in the geometry to lower the center of gravity.

Septal Advancement Flap: Preserving, Restructuring, and Reshaping the Nasal Tip Contour with a Novel Flap

Tip support and the tip's exact final position-rotation and projection-remain a main concern among rhinoplasty surgeons. The available options can be classified into two groups: septal extension graft (variations including tongue-in-groove) and columellar strut (with all its variations). There is still the possibility of nasal tip ligament(s) preservation-namely the interdomal ligament, when anchoraged cephalically to the anterior septal angle preserving the tip support. Including this panoply of solutions, the author has identified some challenges with insufficient outcome. Based on engineering concepts, a novel septal flap was developed to facilitate a preferred tip position and shape. The septal advancement flap (SAF) is a rotational-advancement flap of the superior and caudal aspects of the cartilaginous septum that enables the surgeon to create stable and accurate tip shape and position. This flap was designed following the spare roof technique B sequence, although it can be completed along with any technique of structure or preservation rhinoplasty.

The hammer graft: A novel technique to provide dorsal support, tip projection, and rotation in rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

There are numerous cartilaginous grafts that can be used in rhinoplasty, depending on the specific needs of the patient. These include spreader grafts, dorsal onlay, tip grafts, septal extension, and columellar struts grafts, among others.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to demonstrate use of the hammer graft in rhinoplasty; this technique can be used to improve dorsal support, tip projection, and tip rotation using a single cartilage graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This novel graft was applied in 18 patients who underwent rhinoplasty. In revision patients, hammer graft was harvested from costal cartilage and in primary cases from septum cartilage. They were followed in average 12 months (between 6 and 18 months).

RESULT

Three of these patients were revision cases and 15 were primary cases. In revision patients, hammer graft was harvested from costal cartilage and in primary cases from septal cartilage. The targeted results were achieved to a large extent in all patients. All patients had satisfactory esthetic results.

CONCLUSION

The hammer graft as a single and stable graft useful support for the dorsal part, caudal part and extension part of the septum to be used in primary and revision rhinoplasty.

Nasal Reconstruction in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Two Decade Review

Background: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) leads to progressive destruction of the nasal tissues resulting varying degrees of saddle deformity and nasal obstruction. Reconstructive techniques are numerous, but there are no large series reporting their results. Objective: This study sought to measure complications and outcomes after rhinoplasty for GPA. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 42 patients with GPA who underwent nasal reconstruction of saddle nose deformity between 2005 and 2019 using primarily costal cartilage and soft tissue grafts. Results: Thirty-six patients met the criteria for inclusion. All were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Six patients required revision surgery due to infection or GPA flare ups. Five patients had complications. All patients were given a questionnaire at 12 months to rate their degree of satisfaction with their appearance and breathing. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the use of strong cartilage grafts and the timing of surgery result in improvement in breathing and appearance after rhinoplasty in patients with GPA. Clinical Trial Registration number: REB # 21-125.

X-shaped Tip Graft: A Versatile Solution for Warping Correction in Rib Cartilage-Based Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

An enduringly stable tip graft is the key to achieving successful rhinoplasty. However, the intrinsic tendency of rib grafts to warp renders the long-term outcome of cartilage-based rhinoplasty highly unpredictable.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to detail and validate the utilization of a tip graft that is characterized by a circumferential split on the tip graft, which creates a shape similar to the letter X.

METHODS

The counterrotating force applied intraoperatively and the complications that arose were examined retrospectively. Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetric evaluations of patients was performed. Anthropometric points were analyzed in a blinded fashion. Outcome variables were tip projection, nasal length, tip rotation, and the nasion-pronasale angulation.

RESULTS

Forty-five female patients, ranging in age from 18 to 41 years (average, 28.5 years) completed the study. In all cases, the X graft was applied as an essential element for enhancing tip projection. Postoperative analysis showed excellent maintenance of tip position over time, evidenced by insignificant changes in nasion-pronasale angulation. Other postoperative evaluations, including tip projection, nasal length, and nasolabial angle, showed significant improvement. The differences were not statistically different between short- and long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The X graft effectively mitigates the negative impact of graft warping. It is the ultimate form for tip support and for elongating short noses. It has the merits of versatility and flexibility when used to create a strong and sustainable tip support in East Asian rhinoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Novel method for correcting cephalic rotation in Asian nasal tip plasty

BACKGROUND

To correct nasal tip cephalic rotation, SEG made of cartilage or Medpor are often used in rhinoplasty. These techniques require extensive experience for the surgeon, and not all patients can accept this procedure. In this research, we introduce a new method to correct nasal tip cephalic rotation that is relatively simple and rapid.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients who had rhinoplasty using our scaffold were enrolled in the study between January 2020 and January 2021. The authors evaluated the change of nasolabial angel by photogrammetry using standardized clinical photogrammetric techniques. Patients' satisfaction regarding postoperative results was also surveyed.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 12 months. No complication (infection, extrusion, and displacement) was happened in all patients. Analysis showed our scaffold can correct nasal tip cephalic rotation effectively (98.61±1.21 preoperatively and 89.68±0.99 postoperatively, P<0.0001). And the patient satisfaction rate is 98%.

CONCLUSION

We constructed an integrated scaffold by simply folding and suturing a high-density polyethylene sheet (Su-Por) sheet to correct nasal tip cephalic rotation. Using the scaffold we designed, we did not need to alter the structure of the nasal septum, which reduced the operative duration and simplified the surgical procedure.

Modern Concepts in Nasal Deprojection

SUMMARY

The overprojected nose, also known as a long nose, is a consequence of several interrelated factors. Standardized nasofacial assessment typically is approached through the anterior, lateral, and basal views. The senior author (R.J.R.) has developed an algorithmic approach to deprojection. The algorithm, presented in this article, allows for less aggressive methods to be followed while permitting a cartilage excision modality combined with construct supporting techniques when needed.

Comparison of Nasal Analysis by Photographs (2D) against Low-cost Surface Laser Imaging (3D) and against Computed Axial Tomography Imaging

Introduction In aesthetic surgery, we have a few evaluation tools that numerically and objectively measure the changes we make in patients. This article aimed to evaluate the nasal systematic analysis and compare findings between the three systems of nasal evaluation: photographs 2D, 3D surface imaging with the Kinect system, and 3D CT scan imaging.

Methods We designed a longitudinal and descriptive prospective study with simple non-blind randomization. To compare the systematic nasal analysis between the three methods. If the findings are similar, all three methods would be useful in independent clinical scenarios.

Results A total of 42 observations were included finding a minimum age of 21 with a mean of 28 years old. Also, 64% were female, 93% had adequate facial proportions, and 50% were Fitzpatrick III. For outcome statistics, we found differential nasal deviation between 3D images with a mean of 6.53 mm. While when comparing the nasal dorsum length, we found a statistical significance of p = 0.051. When comparing the nasal dorsum length index, we found no significant difference p = 0.32. Also, we did not find statistical significance when comparing the nasofrontal angle and tip rotation angle p = 1 for both.

Conclusion We found that the population we serve has characteristics of Hispanic mestizo nose. The three methods seem to evaluate systematic nasal analysis in a very similar way, and any of them can be used depending on the scenario and the needs of plastic surgeons.

Evolution of the Septal Extension Graft in Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Long-term Efficacy and Reliability

BACKGROUND

Proper nasal tip projection and rotation have a strong impact on nasal aesthetics. Septal extension graft (SEG) is one of the tools employed to improve tip projection and rotation when performing rhinoplasty. This graft typically overlaps the existing caudal septum in the midline position, lengthening it and facilitating the repositioning of the tip.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to describe the technical evolution of the SEG in endonasal rhinoplasty and evaluate the reliability and long-term efficacy of the current technique.

METHODS

The authors evaluated presurgical and postsurgical photographs of the nasolabial angle and nasal proportions in 60 patients who underwent endonasal rhinoplasty with SEG.

RESULTS

The study demonstrated a clear improvement in tip projection and rotation at the 1-year follow-up. The mean preoperative nasolabial angle was 93.75° ± 9.45° compared with 101.1° ± 5.3° following surgery. Although both were normally distributed, the range of the postoperative nasolabial angle was narrower than 1-year preoperatively (standard deviation = 5.3° vs 9.45°, respectively). The Crumley ratio, utilized to describe nasal proportions, presented significant changes in nasal proportions: 3.84 preoperatively and 4.04 postoperatively (95% confidence interval = -0.24 to -0.149; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of SEG in endonasal rhinoplasty has significantly changed since first described in 2006. The adaptations made to this technique render it more reliable, and our study demonstrates its efficacy in improving tip projection and rotation over the long-term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Fine-Tuning of the Supratip in Rhinoplasty: An External Approach

BACKGROUND

Supratip deformity, also known as the pollybeak deformity, accounts for one of the most common iatrogenic deformities requiring revision surgery in rhinoplasty. We aimed to present a novel technique to prevent supratip deformity and increase the tip definition, especially in patients with thick skin.

METHODS

A total of eighty-three patients were included in the study. In control group, thirty-three consecutive patients with thick skin underwent structured primary rhinoplasty without any additional maneuvers. In study group, thirty-one consecutive patients with thick skin underwent the same operation with an additional "External supratip suture (ESS)." Nineteen patients with moderate skin were also operated using the ESS to accentuate the supratip break and control the soft tissue response. Patients' supratip regions were analyzed with reference to a tangent line from the tip defining point to the nasion. Two independent blinded plastic surgeons rated the supratip aesthetics on a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

The ESS maneuver had better results in the supratip region according to the two parameters which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). No ischemic complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

This simple and reliable external approach is a powerful maneuver which can be an effective technique not only in patients with thick skin, but also in moderate skin patients who requires better supratip definition. It enables surgeon to reduce the nasal volume efficiently in patients with noncompliant skin by controlling skin redraping by adhering to Auersvald's hemostatic net principles. We believe that this approach will find a place in the armamentarium of rhinosurgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266.

Versatility of the Fixed-Mobile Septal Extension Graft for Nasal Tip Reshaping

SUMMARY

Key goals of nasal tip reshaping include precise control of tip shape and position, along with restoration of proper structural support. Unfortunately, traditional techniques attempting to address these goals have yielded unpredictable results. In this article, the authors detail their surgical technique and discuss the numerous aesthetic and functional benefits of this graft, along with its applicability to a wide variety of patient populations and nasal deformities. The authors' technique utilizing the fixed-mobile septal extension graft has demonstrated reliability in establishing proper tip positioning through precise adjustments to tip rotation and projection, while simultaneously providing a stable structure for maintaining tip support. While fixed at the anterior septal angle, this graft also proves beneficial in maintaining natural tip mobility because of its anterior extension past the septum. The fixed-mobile septal extension graft is versatile and reliable when used for tip reshaping and support.

"An integrated clip-shaped costal cartilage carving approach for rhinoplasty"

BACKGROUND

Nasal tip management is considered to be one of the most complicated and challenging parts of rhinoplasty in East Asian patients. Within current rhinoplasty surgical practice, costal cartilage serves as an ideal source for grafting due to its ability to provide strong support to the nasal tip.

METHODS

From March 2013 to December 2021, integrated clip-shaped costal cartilage grafts were applied to patients with primary (n = 12) or secondary (n = 3) short nose deformities. The costal cartilage was carved into an monobloc clip-shaped cartilage graft and then placed on the nasal septum and fixed with sutures. The nasal length index, projection index, and nasolabial angles were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative evaluation at 8 months was performed using a grading scale.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were included in this study with an average age of 23.7 ± 3.6 years. The mean follow-up period was 14.3 ± 5.3 months and ranged from 8 to 26 months. There were statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative values in nose length index and projection index. Also, the nasolabial angle was significantly reduced. Postoperative evaluation, conducted at a minimum of 8 months following surgery, showed that 86.6% (13/15) of patients felt that their surgical results were good or excellent. No patients rated the results as "poor".

CONCLUSION

The integrated clip-shaped costal cartilage carving approach has been shown to be a practical method of obtaining satisfactory esthetic outcomes in patients with nasal deformities.

Preservation Rhinoplasty: Open or Closed?

BACKGROUND

Preservation rhinoplasty (PR) is an evolving philosophy.

OBJECTIVES

The open approach was used initially, but the author felt a closed approach might be of benefit in certain patients.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-two primary rhinoplasty cases were studied retrospectively between January and July 2020. One hundred cases had at least 1 year of follow-up. Patients had follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Technical details were recorded including dissection planes, preservation of the dorsum (DP) versus component reductions, surface versus foundational DP techniques, and open versus closed approach.

RESULTS

One hundred patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. Fifty-six patients underwent an open approach, and 44 a closed approach. Eighty-three patients had preservation of the dorsal soft tissue envelope. All patients having a closed approach had preservation of the dorsal soft tissue envelope. Sixty-seven patients underwent DP with 38 having surface techniques and 29 having impaction techniques. Thirty-three patients underwent structural rhinoplasty with piezoelectric osteotomies and mid-vault reconstruction. All structural cases were performed using an open approach. Four revision surgeries were necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Open and closed approaches have indications depending on the tip and dorsal deformities. A closed, PR is favored with thin skin, minimal dorsal modification, osseocartilaginous preservation (foundation techniques), less complex tip deformities, and overprojected noses. An open, PR is favored for extensive dorsal modification, S-shaped nasal bones, complex tip deformities, and tip augmentation. Structural, dorsal rhinoplasty is always done open and preferred for complex dorsal deformities and severe septal deviations.

Effect of Tongue-in-Groove Technique on Upper Lip Slope in Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Several surgical techniques used for rhinoplasty can change the upper lip form over the long term. By eliminating the membranous septum and causing dysfunction of the depressor septi nasi muscle and performing other maneuvers, the tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique can exaggerate changes in the upper lip shape, length, and slope.

METHODS

This study was conducted to compare the effects of the TIG technique with and without a septal extension graft (SEG) on lip slope and aesthetic angles on the profile view. A retrospective review was performed on 367 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty using the TIG technique from 2016 to 2020. The upper lip angle (ULA), the nasolabial angle (NLA), and the columellar facial angle (CFA) were measured for comparison pre-and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Of 367 patients, 209 underwent TIG, while the rest underwent TIG over SEG (TIG+SEG). Comparison of pre-and post-operative ULAs showed significant changes in both groups. Although mean ULAs increased in both groups, some of the patients in each group experienced a decrease in ULA. The percentage of the patients with increased post-operative ULA significantly grow with increase in the pre-operative NLA (p < 0.05). However, no significant correlation was found between pre-operative CFA and post-operative ULA.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that TIG with and without SEG can change the lip slope on the profile view, possibly due to the shift of the subnasal point superiorly and posteriorly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Technical Variations in the Management of the Medial Crural Reduction According to the Settlement of the Angulation Deformities Over Hypertrophic Lower Lateral Cartilages

BACKGROUND

Medial crural (MC) overlay is reliable method used in tip deprojection. Most cases with lower lateral cartilage (LLC) hypertrophy present by variations of MC and dome shapes needing specific technical maneuvers.

METHODS

Thirteen hundred fourteen primary rhinoplasties were performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients with LLC hypertrophy who underwent MC deprojection were analyzed. Three variations in LLC hypertrophy were recognized. In type I, tip-defining points (TDP) were localized at the median plane with no angulation deformities at the LLC, which was managed by horizontal cuts of the lobular segments 4 to 6 mm below the domes. The cut fragments overlapped for 2 to 5 mm. In type II, TDP was lateralized due to widened divergence angles at the columellalobular junctions, which were managed by horizontal cuts over columellalobular junctions. The cut fragments overlapped 4 to 6 mm. In type III, TDP was localized at the median plane, there were dense angulations at the medial genu, which was managed with symmetrical removal of 4 to 5 mm cartilage from lobular segments. The domes were sutured over the medial segments.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with LLC hypertrophy were included in the study among 314 patients. Twelve patients were female and 7 patients were male. The mean age was 32 years (25-42). Type I, II, and III LLC hypertrophies were detected in 10, 3, and 6 patients, respectively. A harmonious relationship between dorsum and tip and satisfactory tip stability was reached in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

By classification of variations of MC and domal shapes, LLC hypertrophies may be managed with proper technical maneuvers specific to each type.

Effect of Septal Extension Graft on Creating and Maintaining Tip Rotation in Tongue-in-Groove Technique: A Case Control Study

OBJECTIVE

The outcome of rhinoplasty was evaluated in patients undergoing tongue-in-groove technique (TIG) with and without septal extension grafts (SEG) placement for stabilization of nasal tip rotation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-seven patients who underwent rhinoplasty using TIG from 2016 to 2020 were included in this study. SEG was used if the caudal segment of the septum was not suitable for TIG. All patients were photographed pre- and postoperatively. Columellar Facial angle (CFA) and Nasolabial angle (NLA) were measured preoperatively at three intervals including up to six months after the operation (early or T1), up to one year after T1 (midterm or T2), and up to two years after T2 (late or T3).

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine patients (56.94%) underwent TIG and the rest of them (43.06%) received SEG plus TIG (SEG+TIG). The TIG group had a mean CFA of 95.9±7.56 degrees preoperatively, 106.5±6.77 degrees at T1, 105.4±6.48 degrees at T2, and 104.8 ±7.52 at T3. The SEG+TIG had a mean CFA of 98.9±7.65 degrees preoperatively, 108.8±6.58 degrees at T1, 107.7±6.86 degrees at T2, and 106.2 ±15.6 at T3. Comparison of T1, T2, and T3 showed that the CFA changes were less than 1%, indicating a nonsignificant difference. The same results were obtained for NLA as well.

CONCLUSION

Adding of SEG to TIG may be an effective technique to create and maintain a stable rotation comparing to TIG independently.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nasal Tip Shaping Finesse in Rhinoplasty

SUMMARY

Anatomic subtleties of the nasal tip have a dramatic impact on the overall appearance of the nose. Mastery of normal nasal aesthetics and anatomy is a critical prerequisite to adeptly performing nasal tip refinement during open rhinoplasty. This article and series of videos aim to provide a focused review of nasal tip analysis, anatomy, and surgical technique, with particular emphasis on pertinent tip sutures and cartilage grafts.

Flexible Tongue-in-Groove Technique and Its Effectiveness Compared to Classic Tongue-in-Groove and Columellar Strut Graft Techniques: A Retrospective Analysis of 237 Open Rhinoplasty Cases

BACKGROUND

The medial crura are almost always supported in tip surgery using columellar strut graft placement or tongue-in-groove suturing to the caudal septum. In this study, the authors present a modified tongue-in-groove (called "flexible tongue-in-groove") technique.

METHODS

A total of 237 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty between January of 2016 and June of 2018 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into three main groups: (1) flexible tongue-in-groove, (2) classic tongue-in-groove, and (3) columellar strut. Using standardized preoperative and postoperative (1-, 6-, and 12-month) lateral view photographs, the nasolabial angle and Goode ratio were measured for nasal tip rotation and projection, respectively.

RESULTS

Flexible tongue-in-groove (n = 53) and classic tongue-in-groove (n = 107) techniques showed a significantly smaller decrease in the nasolabial angle from month 1 to month 12 than did the columellar strut technique (n = 77) (p < 0.05). These statistically significant differences were not found when the time intervals were narrowed (p > 0.05). Flexible and classic tongue-in-groove techniques showed significantly higher Goode ratios than did the columellar strut technique at 1, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.05 for all). In various analyses using the nasolabial angle and Goode ratio, no statistically significant difference was found between flexible and classic tongue-in-groove techniques (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Flexible and classic tongue-in-groove techniques provide more durable results in nasolabial angle and Goode ratio measurements than does the columellar strut technique in primary open-approach rhinoplasty. The flexible tongue-in-groove technique is as robust as the classic tongue-in-groove technique in appropriate cases.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Effect of Modified Septal Extension Grafts on the Nasal Tip in Rhinoplasty

Background:

One of the faced difficulties of nasal tip surgery is progressive loss of nasal tip projection and rotation postoperatively. Nasal base stabilization by septal extension grafts has shown to improve this loss over time. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a modified septal extension graft can provide the required tip rotation/derotation by changing the angle of the graft’s insertion. In addition, it maintains nasal tip projection without creating a rigid tip. Other than that it avoids the requirement of a large amount of cartilage.

Materials/Methods:

This study involves a retrospective review of 37 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty for primary or secondary cases over a period of 12 months. The average age of the patients was 28 years (range = 20–43 years), and all patients were of Middle Eastern origin. Subjective evaluation based on photographic analysis was used pre and postoperatively.

Results:

All cases included in this study maintained their operative results of tip rotation. Two cases showed a minimal decrease in tip projection documented upon review 6–12 months postoperatively. No patient needed secondary revision surgery due to changes in tip projection or rotation. The objective pre and postoperative findings were satisfying for the patients and surgeons.

Conclusions:

The modified septal extension graft is an effective tool for rotation of the nasal tip as well as derotation of an over rotated tip. It is also capable of maintaining nasal tip projection.

The Principles and Practice of Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Special Topics for Clinics in Plastic Surgery Journal

Endonasal rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive approach in which esthetic and functional improvements are made solely through intranasal, without transcolumellar, incisions and with limited soft tissue and skeletal disruption. In addition to intentionally limiting surgical dissection, the rhinoplasty surgeon must preoperatively recognize and surgically correct 4 common anatomic variants which predictably create all 3 patterns of secondary deformity. In combination, respecting these principles gives the surgeon greater predictability in achieving esthetic and functional improvements, and the ability to limit the adverse effects of skin contractility and postoperative scar contracture, thus reducing the risk of secondary deformity, patient dissatisfaction, and reoperation.

Nasal Tip Support and Management of the Tip Tripod Complex

Controlling the nasal tip to achieve excellent structural and cosmetic outcomes is challenging in rhinoplasty surgery. A strong foundation and understanding of the nasal tripod complex and the various methods for restoring tip support mechanisms when disrupted either from surgery or other means is critical. The columellar strut graft, septal extension graft, and tongue-in-groove suture technique are well-described methods to control and support the nasal tip. There are advantages and disadvantages to each method, but one should be comfortable with the nuances of each to master nasal tip surgery.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Definitive Secondary Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty Using Cartilage Graft

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional assessment of nasal morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip nose treated by cartilage graft augmentation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Thirteen patients with unilateral cleft lip nose underwent definitive secondary rhinoplasty and postsurgical changes were examined using a three-dimensional (3D) laser scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Nasal dorsum length, nasal tip, alar width, and alar base width in frontal view; nasion depth, nasal tip projection, nasal dorsal angle, and nasal tip angle in lateral view; nostril width, nostril height, and nasal tip height in basal view were measured at preoperative (T1: within 6 months), short follow-up (T2: 2-10 weeks), and long follow-up (T3: 9-14 months).

RESULTS

A significant change in alar width, alar base width, nostril width, and nostril height at the cleft side, nasal dorsum length, nasion depth, nasal tip projection, and nasal tip height was observed from T1 to T3 follow-up after rhinoplasty (P < .05), whereas the nostril height at the noncleft side was also significantly increased at T2 follow-up but the mean change in height relapsed at T3 follow-up. Alar width, alar base width, and nostril width at the noncleft side, and nasal tip angle did not change significantly after surgery at any follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

3D imaging evaluation after secondary cleft rhinoplasty demonstrated improved functional and aesthetic outcomes using a septal or conchal graft.

A Novel Modification of Tongue in Groove Technique (Auto-Septal Projection Graft) in Rhinoplasty

INTRODUCTION

Derotation of the nasal tip with narrow nasolabial angle is a common nasal deformity that leads to a long nose appearance, named drooping nose. In these patients, there are various techniques described to fix droopy tip and to achieve a desirable nasal tip rotation such as caudal septal extension graft, extended columellar strut graft, tongue in groove, columellar strut graft, and tip rotation sutures. This study aimed to evaluate changes in nasal tip support after modified tongue-in-groove technique (auto-septal projection graft).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients who underwent a primary open approach septorhinoplasty using the modified tongue-in-groove technique between June 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative and preoperative photographs were analyzed, and nasolabial angle and the nasal tip projection ratio were recorded and compared before and average of 17.3 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (33 female and 9 male) were included the study. The mean nasolabial angle was 85.7° preoperatively and 99.3° postoperatively. The nasal tip projection ratio was 0.60 preoperatively and 0.64 postoperatively. Both the tip rotation and the tip projection increased significantly after the modified tongue in groove (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

It seems that modified tongue-in-groove method (auto-septal projection graft) is an effective technique in maintaining tip projection and rotation in rhinoplasty and safe method to correct droopy nasal tip in selected cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Rotating the Tip in Long Noses: A Strategy rather than a Single Technique

Background:

Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures in plastic surgery, the incidence of which has increased up to approximately 1 million cases in 2016 according to the recent International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery survey. This study aimed at defining the importance of each sequential procedure within the same surgery, the extent to which a procedure can be performed, and those that can be omitted.

Methods:

In this descriptive study, 27 candidates (18 women; nine men; age range, 20–48 years) for primary rhinoplasty between September 2016 and September 2019 were included. All had long noses, their main concern was reduction of nasal tip projection and all were seeking cranial tip rotation to enhance their tip aesthetics. Those who required revision rhinoplasty or who had nasal deformities due to congenital defects, and those older than 60 or younger than 18 years of age, were excluded.

Results:

The average nasolabial angle in women preoperatively was 88.2 ± 6.6 and postoperatively 102.8 ± 5.6. In men, the average average nasolabial angle preoperatively was 79.6 ± 5.4 and postoperatively 92.3 ± 2.3. In both men and women, the P value was <0.001, which indicates high significance. Tip rotation was achieved in all patients, with 81% achieving ideal rotation, and 19% exceeding the ideal range.

Conclusions:

Rotating the tip in long noses is a complex procedure. It can be achieved by many described techniques, but not all are required. A general strategy should be followed during which variable techniques, with varying efficacy, can be utilized.

Double Columellar Strut: A New Method for Tip Surgery-A Study of 642 Cases with a 15-Year Follow-up

GOAL

Of the first nasal tip modeling procedures performed, the Anderson tripod concept is the most well known, and many anatomy-related studies have analyzed the components involved in tip surgery. The main goals of nasal tip surgery are to stabilize the tip complex, which largely affects the shape, projection and rotation of the nasal tip.

OBJECTIVE

The present study describes a new, original method, the double columellar strut and its main advantages compared to conventional techniques used for structural rhinoplasty.

METHODS

The study involved 642 patients (496 women and 146 men, with an average age of 38.67 years) who underwent surgery between 2004 and 2018 by two operators. The patients were re-examined to evaluate the outcomes at least 1 year after surgery, and long-term results (15 years) were recorded for the oldest patients in regard to esthetics (projection, shape, rotation) and breathing function.

RESULTS

Of the 642 patients, 34 required a surgical revision for minor defects of the tip due to asymmetry, and the natural appearance after the first surgery was not affected. For the primary rhinoplasties, there were no breathing disorders that required revision surgery due to systematic restoration or preservation of the middle third.

CONCLUSION

The double columellar strut could be performed in the same conditions that the others conventional structural grafts. As a polyvalent alternative, it can be used with closed or open approaches and involves the use of only a limited amount of cartilaginous material. This anatomical approach yields natural results, acting as a foundation for controlling the shape, projection and rotation of the nasal tip. In addition, with or without complementary techniques such as the "tongue-in-groove" technique or tip grafts, the double columellar strut can be considered a "multifunction pocket knife" for tip surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .