Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years

Optimizing Intraflap Anastomosis of Conjoined Bilateral DIEP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Planning, Execution, and Outcomes in 201 Patients

BACKGROUND

Conjoined bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap with intraflap anastomosis is an efficient approach for breast reconstruction, enabling the use of almost the entire abdominal tissue. Variations in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) anatomy may make it challenging to apply this technique consistently. This study aimed to derive optimal strategies for achieving reliable conjoined bilateral DIEP flap with intraflap anastomosis universally.

METHODS

For all consecutive patients undergoing conjoined bilateral DIEP flap-based breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2023, preoperative planning and intraoperative execution for the pedicle configurations were reviewed. Their postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 201 patients were included, with no cases requiring conversion to extraflap anastomosis. In preoperative planning, candidates for recipient vessels for intraflap anastomosis were typically selected on the basis of DIEA branching patterns, identified through computed tomographic angiography: type 1 (single trunk) prioritizing the superior continuation, type 2 (2 main trunks) considering a side branch, and type 3 (3 main trunks) favoring the first bifurcating branch. Comparing candidates from bilateral DIEA, the primary pedicle was determined, providing larger recipient vessels. Most cases followed the planned approach smoothly; however, 28 required intraoperative changes, mostly aimed at securing larger recipients by changing the primary pedicle or harvesting more caudally located perforators to obtain larger superior continuations. Four perfusion-related complications developed, which were resolved successfully without flap failure.

CONCLUSION

The authors' results suggest an efficient strategy for securing a reliable recipient vessel, tailored to patient anatomy, in conjoined bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with intraflap anastomosis, leading to achieving optimal outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression

BACKGROUND

 This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications.

METHODS

 A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method.

RESULTS

 The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (β = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (β = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (β = -0.0015, p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (β = 0.0032, p = 0.0262) and pregnancy history (β = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge.

CONCLUSION

 Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit.

Multi-Flap Microsurgical Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction (MABR) remains the gold standard technique of breast reconstruction, providing a durable, natural, and aesthetically pleasing result. However, some patients may not be candidates for a traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, either due to abdominal tissue paucity, the need for higher-volume reconstruction, or prior surgical procedures. In these patients, alternative flaps must be considered to achieve the optimal result. Such configurations include the conjoined (or double pedicle) DIEP flap, and alternative flaps such as the lumbar artery perforator (LAP) and profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps, which can be combined in a stacked fashion. By combining multiple flaps in a conjoined or stacked fashion, breast reconstruction can be optimized to fulfill the three critical components of breast reconstruction in restoring the skin envelope, breast footprint, and conus shape. When harvesting multiple flaps, the surgical sequence of events must be meticulously planned to ensure an efficient and successful operation. Preoperative imaging can aid the surgeon in identifying the ideal perforator, assess for side branches for possible intra-flap anastomoses, expedite the operative time, and decrease intraoperative complications. Reconstructive surgeons should be familiar with the variety of configurations with conjoined and/or stacked flaps to address patient-specific reconstructive needs.

Imaging in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The evolution of imaging actively shapes clinical management in the field. Ultrasonography (US), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) stand out as the most extensively researched imaging modalities for ABR. Ongoing advancements include "real-time" angiography and three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging, and future prospects incorporate augmented or virtual reality (AR/VR) and artificial intelligence (AI). These technologies may further enhance perioperative efficiency, reduce donor-site morbidity, and improve surgical outcomes in ABR.

The Delay Procedure in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The delay procedure in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, in which the reduced-caliber choke vessels play a major role, can provide more well-perfused tissue than a standard DIEP flap. The aim of this study was to review the authors' experience with this technique, evaluate the indications, and analyze the surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive DIEP delay procedures performed between March of 2019 and June of 2021. Patient demographic characteristics, operative details, and complications were registered. Patients had preoperative imaging by magnetic resonance angiography to select dominant perforators. The surgical technique involves a two-stage operation. During the first operation, the flaps were pedicled on a dominant perforator and a lateral skin bridge extending toward the lateral flank and lumbar fat; in a second stage, the flap was harvested and transferred.

RESULTS

A total of 82 extended DIEP delay procedures were performed to reconstruct 154 breasts. The majority were bilateral breast reconstructions (87.8%). The delay procedure was used for 38 primary reconstructions (46.3%) and 32 tertiary reconstructions (39.0%). The primary indication was the need for additional volume (79.3%), followed by extensive abdominal scarring and liposuction. After the first operation, seroma was the most frequently observed complication (7.3%). After the second operation, three total flap losses (1.9%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The delay procedure in DIEP flap breast reconstruction results in the harvest of a good amount of abdominal tissue by adding a preliminary procedure. This technique can convert cases previously considered unsuitable into suitable candidates for abdominal-based breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Strategic Approaches to Intraflap Anastomosis: Navigating Conjoined DIEP Flap Reconstruction-A Comprehensive Roadmap

Background

For patients desiring autologous breast reconstruction without adequate abdominal tissue volume, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may be stacked or combined with other flaps for bilateral reconstruction. Various combinations of anastomoses have been described in the literature. We sought to describe a framework for intraflap anastomoses.

Methods

A retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent conjoined DIEP flaps with intraflap anastomoses with a single surgeon was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and complications were reviewed. A framework scheme was developed for the type of intraflap anastomosis performed.

Results

Between 2016 and 2020, 17 patients underwent conjoined DIEP flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Fourteen patients had delayed reconstruction. Eleven patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which a medial perforator on the left hemiabdomen flap was anastomosed with a distal lateral row perforator in the right hemiabdomen flap (type A). Four patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which a left lateral perforator was anastomosed to a right distal lateral row perforator (type B). Two patients underwent an intraflap anastomosis in which the left superficial inferior epigastric vessel was anastomosed to a right lateral row perforator (type C). Complications included reoperation (11.8%), partial flap loss (5.9%), seroma (23.5%), and hematoma (11.8%).

Conclusions

We report a detailed framework for intraflap anastomoses of conjoined DIEP flap reconstruction including superficial inferior epigastric artery/superficial inferior epigastric vessel options. Knowledge of this comprehensive framework will allow surgeons to identify the type of intraflap anastomoses required for the anatomy they encounter and will standardize reporting of surgical technique in the literature.

Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast

The incidence of breast cancer and, therefore, the need for breast reconstruction are expected to increase. The many reconstructive options available and the changing aspects of the field make this a complex area of plastic surgery, requiring knowledge and expertise. Two major types of breast reconstruction can be distinguished: breast implants and autologous flaps. Both present advantages and disadvantages. Autologous fat grafting is also commonly used. MRI is the modality of choice for evaluating breast reconstruction. Knowledge of the type of reconstruction is preferable to provide the maximum amount of pertinent information and avoid false positives. Early complications include seroma, hematoma, and infection. Late complications depend on the type of reconstruction. Implant rupture and implant capsular contracture are frequently encountered. Depending on the implant type, specific MRI signs can be depicted. In the case of myocutaneous flap, fat necrosis, fibrosis, and vascular compromise represent the most common complications. Late cancer recurrence is much less common. Rarely reported late complications include breast-implant-associated large cell anaplastic lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and, recently described and even rarer, breast-implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma (BIA-SCC). In this review article, the various types of breast reconstruction will be presented, with emphasis on pertinent imaging findings and complications.

Abdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: How to Inset the Flap to Maximize the Aesthetic Result-A Systematic Review

Nowadays, the ultimate goal of microsurgical breast reconstruction is not merely the effective transfer of vascularized tissue but the achievement of a natural, symmetric appearance. The aim of this present study was to systematically summarize the published evidence on abdominal-based free flap inset for breast reconstruction in order to provide principles and classification that could guide the surgeon in choosing the most appropriate inset technique based on patient and flap characteristics. A comprehensive review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, looking for articles on the insetting technique for free flap breast reconstruction. After screening 306 publications, 24 papers (published from 1994 to 2020) were included in the study. We identified four main breast anatomical features on which the papers reviewed focused when describing their insetting technique: breast width, breast ptosis, breast projection, and upper pole fullness. Patient body type, type of mastectomy, and reported complications are also discussed. Flap shaping and inset during breast reconstruction are fundamental steps in any reconstructive procedure. Despite the low evidence in the current literature, this systematic review provides a framework to guide the surgeon's decision-making and optimize the aesthetic outcomes of abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction.

Preoperative Assessment of the Breast Reconstruction Patient

Through a multidisciplinary approach, as well as, a nuanced appreciation of patient goals and setting appropriate expectations, breast reconstruction can significantly improve the quality of life following mastectomy. A thorough review of the patient medical and surgical history in addition to oncologic treatments will facilitate discussion and recommendations for an individualized shared decision-making reconstructive process. Alloplastic reconstruction, although a highly popular modality, has important limitations. On the contrary, autologous reconstruction is more flexible but requires more thorough consideration.

Inframammary Fold Banking of the Non-Dominant Superficial Epigastric Vein (SIEV) in Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Simple and Helpful Backup Option for Revision Surgery

Free flaps from the lower abdomen represent the workhorses of modern autologous, microvascular breast reconstruction. Rare signs of venous congestion often become evident during the primary index operation, but a secondary shift of the initially dominant drainage of the DIEV system to the SIEV system with consequent malperfusion is a feared, rare event requiring urgent decision, and complex skill using vein grafts and additional anastomosis to restore a sufficient venous outflow. For secondary anastomosis of the SIEV, especially in stacked flaps, a vein graft to the DIEV or retrograde IMV may be necessary, but this requires an additional donor site, thus prolonging procedure time during the emergency operation and resulting in additional scars of the graft’s donor site. We report on a versatile, easy technique of scheduled inframammary fold banking of the dissected, flushed, and clipped non-dominant superficial epigastric vein (SIEV) in unilateral autologous breast reconstruction during the index operation. The banked graft may service as an easy and convenient accessible vein graft in the rare event of secondary shifting of the initial dominant drainage of the DIEV to the SIEV system with the need for urgent re-operation. We retrospectively evaluated the management and outcome of all suitable patients receiving autologous breast reconstruction with a unilateral abdominal DIEP or MS-Tram flap accompanied by banking of the SIEV in the breast pocket between 2017 and 2020 in the present study. In two out of 42 patients (4.8%) receiving autologous breast reconstruction with an abdominal DIEP or MS-TRAM flap with banking of the SIEV in the breast pocket, secondary malperfusion of the flap with progressive venous congestion occurred during the first 48 h perioperatively, between 2 and 37 (mean: 19.5) hours after skin closure. In both cases malperfusion was due to secondary SIEV system dominance, and the banked vein was used as an interpositional graft to the retrograde IMV (case 1) or the DIEV (case 2). Revision surgery lasted between 95 and 121 (mean: 108) minutes without the need for further vein graft harvesting, and further healing was uneventful. Based on the limited cases, inframammary fold banking of the non-dominant SIEV is a versatile, beneficial, and feasible concept with scarce additional dissection time and can be done in all unilateral breast reconstructions to have a reliable graft for emergency re-exploration. It is a useful approach in the context of spare part surgery and tissue banking to safeguard against the rare instance of venous congestion and need for an interpositional graft.

Anterior Neck Resurfacing Using Multiple Free Flaps in Patients With Burn Sequelae of the Anterior Neck and Chest

BACKGROUND

It has been established that patients with burn sequelae of the anterior neck and chest have a significant degree of flap descent and deficit in neck extension when resurfaced with a single free flap. A protocol was developed to avoid flap descent in these patients by resurfacing the neck with multiple free flaps. The purpose of this article is to present our protocol for treatment and long-term results of this technique.

METHODS

Twenty-five 25 patients with burn sequelae of the anterior neck and anterior thorax were retrospectively identified. Ten patients were treated with a single free flap (group 1), and 15 patients were treated with multiple free flaps (group 2). Patients were followed up for an average of 7 years after their definitive reconstructive procedure at which time measurements including flap descent from sternal notch, deficit of neck extension, and subjective reports of discomfort were obtained.

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 demonstrated 8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.75 cm) of flap descent, whereas patients in group 2 demonstrated 0.5 cm (IQR, 0 cm) of flap descent. Patients in group 1 demonstrated 12.5 degrees (IQR, 10 degrees) of deficit in neck extension, whereas patients in group 2 demonstrated 0 degrees (IQR, 0 degrees) of deficit in neck extension. Analysis demonstrated significantly greater descent and deficit in neck extension in group 1 compared with group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with burn sequelae of the neck and anterior chest experience less flap descent and deficits in neck extension when resurfaced with multiple free flaps.

Truncal-based perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: A review of 975 flaps and their clinical application

BACKGROUND

When autologous breast reconstruction is desired and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is inadequate or unavailable, other perforator flaps in the truncal region should not be disregarded. This study aimed to review all truncal-based perforator flaps used for autologous breast reconstruction to identify clinical indications and outcomes of alternate perforator flaps.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2018, patients undergoing truncal-based perforator flap breast reconstruction were reviewed and data recorded for; indications, pre-operative and intra-operative treatment decisions, flap failures, take-backs, and revisions. Compared to the gold standard of the DIEP flap, alternate truncal-based flaps were evaluated for their reconstructive merit and application.

RESULTS

A total of 975 perforator flaps were harvested circumferentially around the lower trunk. As an alternative or adjunct to the DIEP flap (n = 633, 65%), perforator flaps were harvested based on the superficial inferior epigastric, the deep and superficial circumflex iliac arteries, the intercostal, and lumbar arteries (n = 342, 35%). Overlapping vascular territories facilitate the safe harvest of these alternate flaps with 0.8% of flaps requiring take back (n = 8) and 0.2% flap failure rate (n = 2). There was no difference in peri-operative outcomes between anterior abdominal and alternate truncal-based flaps (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential harvest of alternate truncal flaps is an appropriate option for autologous reconstruction with comparable peri-operative and long-term outcomes as compared to flaps from the anterior abdomen.

Bilateral Outpatient Breast Reconstruction with Stacked DIEP and Vertical PAP Flaps

Background:

Stacking free flaps for breast reconstruction is far from novel, even in the case of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) plus profunda artery perforator (PAP) configuration, where the latter is always described in the traditional transverse configuration. We present a series of consecutive patients undergoing bilateral breast reconstruction with stacked DIEP and vertical PAP flaps.

Methods:

Patients with inadequate abdominal donor tissue were offered the possibility of a stacking breast reconstruction. The DIEP flap was harvested via microfascial incisions, whereas the vertical PAP flap was harvested in the lithotomy position, following the course of the gracilis muscle.

Results:

In total, 28 consecutive patients with a mean BMI of 24.9 underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with stacked DIEP and vertical PAP flaps. The internal mammary artery and vein were used as recipient vessels in all 56 stacked flaps. Fifty-three PAP flaps were anastomosed to the distal portion of the (primary) DIEP flaps utilizing a sequential flap anastomosis technique, and one DIEP flap was anastomosed to the distal portion of the (primary) PAP flap. Hospitalization for the initial eight patients averaged 35 hours, whereas the following 20 patients were discharged within 23 hours. There were no postoperative takebacks or vascular complications.

Conclusions:

Stacked DIEP/PAP flaps offer an excellent option for patients who require more volume than available from DIEP flaps alone. When compared with transverse PAP flaps, the vertical PAP offers excellent variability of volume and ease of shaping to allow for excellent results, while minimizing donor site tension in the seated position and preserving the gluteal fold.

A multicentre study of the relationship between abdominal flap and mastectomy weights in immediate unilateral free flap breast reconstruction and the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy

Abdominal free flaps are considered the gold standard for post-mastectomy autologous breast reconstruction. A key element of outcome assessment is breast symmetry often achieved by approximating the reconstructed breast dimensions such as weight (wt) to those of the mastectomy. However, the ideal relationship between these two entities remains unclear. 525 immediate unilateral abdominal free flap breast reconstruction (FFBR) patients were enrolled in a multicentre study (UK 141; Italy 384) and subdivided into Group A (flap wt < mastectomy wt, n = 163), Group B (flap wt > mastectomy wt, n = 260) and Group C (flap wt = mastectomy wt, n = 102). Their rates of contralateral balancing and ipsilateral revision surgeries were compared using Chi-Square tests. Radiotherapy influence on these adjustment procedures was also assessed. More contralateral balancing procedures (17%) were performed than ipsilateral revisions (10%). Group A rates of contralateral balancing procedures were three times higher than Group B's with a ratio of 37 to 1 versus Group C (37% vs 11% vs 1% respectively, p < 0.001). Similarly, the ipsilateral breast revision surgery rate in Group A was double that of Group B and almost three times that of Group C (17% vs 8% vs 6% respectively, p = 0.01). Adjuvant radiotherapy disproportionately increased ipsilateral revisions versus contralateral balancing surgeries (p = 0.028). A flap-to-mastectomy weight ratio of less than 1 (Group A) significantly increases subsequent adjustments on both contralateral and reconstructed breasts whilst irradiation predisposes to ipsilateral revisions. This is important in patient counselling and intraoperative flap contouring. Flap weight should ideally approximate or exceed mastectomy weight in unilateral FFBR.

Three-Dimensional Visualization for Extended Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to provide an applied and digital anatomical basis of acquiring extended deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps for clinical use.

METHODS

Five formalin-soaked specimens were received red latex injection and dissected by layers. The arteriography using the modified mixture of lead oxide-gelatin was performed on 10 adult cadavers that were serially scanned by a spiral computed tomography. The DIEPs were 3 dimensionally reconstructed by Mimics.

RESULTS

The medial row perforators of DIEP arteries are located in the medial 1/third of rectus abdominis muscle, and lateral row perforators in the lateral 1/third of the muscle. The perforators distribute mainly from the upper tendinous intersection of umbilicus to below umbilicus within 8.0 cm, especially 4.0 cm. There are constant diameter 0.8-mm perforators or greater accompanied with nerveswithin this region. The main perforators are shown by fast direct volume rendering (VR) reconstruction method, and 3-dimensional images of DIEPs are acquired by dynamic reconstruction (DR) method. Consecutively, the adjacent perforators can be combined freely and the position and anastomosis of extended branches can be easily observed. The extended DIEP flaps were designed by VR and DR methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIEPs can obtain large extended perforator flaps accompanied with nerves. The perforator close to the umbilicus should be selected while designing the DIEP flap. The 3-dimensional model of extended DIEP flaps can be established conveniently and intuitively by VR and DR methods of Mimics.

Latest Advancements in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the available donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction. 2. Describe the advantages and limitations of each donor site. 3. Provide a rational, algorithmic preoperative evaluation and approach for patients seeking autologous breast reconstruction. 4. Develop an effective postoperative monitoring system to minimize complications and maximize salvage of microvascular thromboses.

SUMMARY

Breast reconstruction remains at the heart of the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and it is continuously evolving. Tremendous advances in breast implant technology and supplemental products, particularly acellular dermal matrices, have revolutionized breast reconstruction in the modern era. However, microvascular free flap breast reconstruction has also witnessed profound advancements with exceptionally high success rates, with the ability to provide the most durable and natural breast reconstruction. Although the pendulum oscillates between prosthesis-based reconstruction and autologous tissue, the present synopsis will focus on autologous free flap breast reconstruction from an historical perspective, recent advancements in microsurgery, and the future of autologous breast reconstruction.

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Bipedicled Total Abdominal versus Unipedicled Hemiabdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 While bipedicled free flaps enable increased soft tissue volume and potential for contralateral symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction, the influence of bipedicled flap reconstruction on patient-reported outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

 Patients undergoing unilateral free flap breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and sent the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. Complication rates and the BREAST-Q and Decisional Regret Scale scores (0-100) were compared between patients receiving bipedicled total abdominal and unipedicled hemiabdominal free flaps.

RESULTS

 Sixty-five patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale with median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time of 32 [22-55] months. Compared with bipedicled flaps, patients receiving unipedicled hemiabdominal flaps had higher mean body mass index (BMI; p = 0.009) and higher incidence of fat grafting (p = 0.03) and contralateral reduction mammaplasties (p = 0.03). There was no difference in incidence of major or minor complications, abdominal hernias or bulges, or total operative time between bipedicled and unipedicled flaps (p > 0.05). Overall, BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with breast, sexual wellbeing, psychosocial wellbeing, physical wellbeing (chest), and physical wellbeing (abdomen) and the Decision Regret Scale scores did not significantly vary between bipedicled and unipedicled reconstructions (all p > 0.05). However, among large-breasted patients (≥C cup), mean (standard deviation [SD]) sexual wellbeing was significantly higher after bipedicled total abdominal free flap reconstruction ([60.2 (23.3) vs. 46.2 (22.0)]; p = 0.04), though this difference did not reach significance after multivariate adjustment.

CONCLUSION

 Unilateral breast reconstruction with bipedicled total abdominal free flaps results in similar complication risk, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret without the need for as many contralateral reduction procedures.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Microvascular Stacked and Conjoined-Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Stacked and conjoined (SC) flaps are a useful means of increasing flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction. The majority of studies, however, have been limited to smaller, single-center series.

METHODS

 A systematic literature review was performed to identify outcomes-based studies on microvascular SC-flap breast reconstruction. Pooled rates of flap and operative characteristics were analyzed. Meta-analytic effect size estimates were calculated for reconstructive complication rates and outcomes of studies comparing SC flaps to non-SC flaps. Meta-regression analysis identified risk factors for flap complications.

RESULTS

 Twenty-six studies were included for analysis (21 case series, five retrospective cohort studies) for a total of 869 patients, 1,003 breasts, and 2006 flaps. The majority of flaps were harvested from the bilateral abdomen (78%, 782 breasts) followed by combined abdomen-thigh stacked flaps (22.2%, 128 breasts). About 51.1% of flaps were anastomosed to anterograde/retrograde internal mammary vessels (230 breasts) and 41.8% used internal mammary/intraflap anastomoses (188 breasts). Meta-analysis revealed a rate of any flap complication of 2.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.4-3.3%), Q-statistic value p = 0.012 (I ² = 43.3%). SC flaps had a decreased risk of fat necrosis compared with non-SC flaps (odds ratio = 0.126, p < 0.0001, I ² = 0.00%), though rates of any flap and donor-site complication were similar. Age, body mass index, flap weight, and flap donor site and recipient vessels were not associated with increased risk of any flap complication.

CONCLUSION

 A global appraisal of the current evidence demonstrated the safety of SC-flap breast reconstruction with low complication rates, regardless of donor site, and lower rates of fat necrosis compared with non-SC flaps.

The Use of the Bipedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of abdominal flaps is recognized as a very advantageous approach for breast reconstruction with gradual refinements leading from the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap to the criterion standard deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and its several variations. A systematic review with meta-analysis attempts to investigate the safety of the bipedicled DIEP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The literature search used "PubMed" database, and a relevant study conducted at the Queen Victoria Hospital was also included. The extraction of data included study type, follow-up, patients' age, body mass index, preexisting abdominal scars, timing of reconstruction, operating time, flap inset, pedicles' configuration, flap failure, revision, and complication rates. Proportions were pooled with Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation, and meta-regression was performed to evaluate whether complication rates were modified by different variables.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible articles provided an overall sample of 486 flaps, with a median follow-up of 18.5 months. In most cases, immediate reconstruction with undivided flap was performed, with equal use of extraflap and intraflap pedicles' configuration. Only 4 cases of flap failure (0.82%) were documented, with 18% overall complications and 3% fat necrosis rate. The forest plot showed significant between-study heterogeneity, and meta-regression revealed marginal positive association between older patient and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipedicled DIEP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction is a technique that maintains the complications rate relatively low in challenging postmastectomy cases. Further comparative studies are needed to substantiate the findings of this study.

Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Stacked and conjoined free flaps are increasingly utilized in autologous breast reconstruction to augment tissue transfer volume. However, there is a paucity of comparative data on abdominally-based stacked/conjoined versus non-stacked/conjoined flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare ability to match native breast size, complications, recovery, and symmetrizing procedures between these two cohorts in unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all stacked (two separate hemiabdominal)/conjoined (bipedicled full abdominal) flaps and non-stacked/conjoined (unipedicled hemiabdominal) flaps in unilateral abdominally-based autologous breast reconstructions was performed from 2011 to 2018. Variables including demographics, operative characteristics, complications, and revisions were compared in 36 stacked/conjoined patients versus 146 non-stacked/conjoined patients.

RESULTS

The stacked/conjoined cohort had more DIEP flaps (91.7 vs. 65.1%) and the non-stacked/conjoined group more MS-TRAMs (34.2 vs. 6.9%, p = .000). Additionally, non-stacked/conjoined flaps had greater utilization of combined medial and lateral row perforators (p = .000). Mean flap weight was significantly higher than mastectomy weight in stacked/conjoined flaps (+110.7 g) when compared to non-stacked/conjoined flaps (-40.2) (p = .023). Average follow-up was 54.7 ± 27.5 and 54.6 ± 29.3 months, respectively. Stacked/conjoined flaps had lower fat necrosis rates (8.3 vs. 25.4%, p = .039) and had a decreased risk of fat necrosis on multivariable regression analysis (OR 0.278, p = 0.045). There were otherwise no differences in flap, breast, or donor-site complications. Stacked/conjoined flaps also had a lower rate of contralateral breast reduction (p = .041).

CONCLUSION

Stacked/conjoined flaps were associated with a lower risk of fat necrosis compared with non-stacked/conjoined flaps and had a lower rate of contralateral symmetrizing reductions in patients undergoing unilateral abdominally-based breast reconstruction.

Orienting the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) pedicle in a stacked SIEA-deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap configuration for unilateral tertiary breast reconstruction

Superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps represent a useful option in autologous breast reconstruction. However, the short-fixed pedicle can limit flap inset options. We present a challenging flap inset successfully addressed by de-epithelialization, turnover, and counterintuitive rotation. A 47-year-old woman underwent left tertiary breast reconstruction with stacked free flaps using right deep inferior epigastric perforator and left SIEA vessels. Antegrade and retrograde anastomoses to the internal mammary (IM) vessels were preferred; additionally, the thoracodorsal vessels were unavailable due to previous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Optimal shaping required repositioning of the lateral ends of the flaps superiorly, which would position the ipsilateral SIEA hemi-flap pedicle lateral to and out of reach of the IM vessels. This problem was overcome by turning the SIEA flap on its long axis, allowing the pedicle to sit medially with the lateral end of the flap positioned superiorly. The de-epithelialized SIEA flap dermis was in direct contact with the chest wall, enabling its fixation. This method of flap inset provides a valuable solution for medializing the SIEA pedicle while maintaining an aesthetically satisfactory orientation. This technique could be used in ipsilateral SIEA flap breast reconstructions that do not require a skin paddle, as with stacked flaps or following nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Low Body Mass Index Patients: Strategies for Maximizing Skin Envelope and Breast Volume

Pure autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients creates challenges. This review highlights techniques to optimize the scarce donor tissue available, approaches to reconstruction, and microsurgical techniques. A systematic approach to maximize breast volume and the skin envelope in patients who underwent pure autologous breast reconstruction by a single senior surgeon is presented with a clinical case series. Included in the study were 125 patients (217) with autologous breast reconstructions. Although DIEP flaps were the commonest flap used overall (79%), within in the low body mass index (<22) group, there was a greater use of Latissimus (32%), and thigh-based flaps (>50%).

Comparisons Between Normal Body Mass Index and Overweight Patients Who Underwent Unilateral Microsurgical Breast Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

This study compared the outcomes of unilateral microsurgical breast reconstructions using abdomen-based flaps between normal body mass index (BMI; 18.5 < BMI < 24.9 kg/m²) and overweight (25 < BMI < 29.9 kg/m²) patients.

METHODS

Between March 2000 and December 2015, patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstructions using abdomen-based flaps were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes variables evaluated included the flap-used weight, flap-used/flap-harvested percentage, flap-used/specimen percentage, complication rates, revision procedures, and quality of life using the Breast-Q questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 415 patients with a mean age of 45.3 ± 8.2 years underwent 418 abdomen-based flaps. The overall success rate was 98.8%, with 99.1% and 97.9% of patients included in the normal BMI and overweight groups, respectively (p = 0.36). The mean flap-used weight and flap-used/flap-harvested values of 461 ± 132.1 g and 82.2 ± 11.6%, respectively, in the normal BMI group were statistically different from values of 610 ± 148.9 g and 71.4 ± 14.1% in the overweight group (both p < 0.01). The mean flap-used/specimen percentage was 118.5 ± 32.9 and 111.7 ± 36.6 in the normal BMI and overweight groups, respectively (p = 0.26). At a mean follow-up of 135 ± 55.4 months, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of total complication rates (25.7% vs. 29.2%; p = 0.30), revision times (36.1% vs. 36.5%; p = 0.91) and all four domains (all p > 0.05) of the Breast-Q.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a normal BMI required a smaller flap-used weight but higher flap-used/flap-harvested percentage for unilateral microsurgical breast reconstructions that could be performed with a high success rate and comparable complication and revision rates.

Diep Flap Volume Augmentation: Literature Review and "Calzone" Flap Shaping Technique

Breast reconstruction with DIEP flap is a well-accepted and well-established technique for autologous breast reconstruction. In the past, this reconstructive option was typically offered to a limited group of patients as previous surgeries or low BMI were considered to be an obstacle to the success of the procedure or for the achievement of a satisfactory cosmetic outcome due to the lack of available tissue. Nowadays, this does not correspond to truth anymore and DIEP flaps are performed routinely on slender patients and on women who have undergone previous liposuction or abdominal surgeries. This paper analyzes current surgical options for volume recruitment in patients with scanty abdominal tissue or with abdominal scars and presents our standardized approach for DIEP volume augmentation with the "Calzone style" bipedicled DIEP flap.

Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction to a Single Set of Internal Mammary Vessels: Technique, Safety, and Outcomes after 250 Flaps

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. In bilateral cases, both flaps are often anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels on either side of the sternum. The authors propose a method in which both flaps are anastomosed to only the right side internal mammary artery and vein.

METHODS

Between November of 2009 and March of 2018, 125 patients underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with this technique. One flap is perfused by the anterograde proximal internal mammary artery and the second one by the retrograde distal internal mammary artery after presternal tunneling. Patient demographics and operative details were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty flaps were performed. One hundred fifty-two flaps were prophylactic or primary reconstructions (60.8 percent), 70 were secondary reconstructions (28 percent), and 28 were tertiary reconstructions (11.2 percent). Mean patient age was 46 years, and the mean body mass index was 25 kg/m. Sixty patients underwent radiation therapy or chemotherapy (48 percent). The authors encountered one significant partial failure (0.4 percent) and nine complete flap failures (3.6 percent). The authors did not see a statistically significant predisposition for failure comparing the retrograde with the anterograde flow flaps, nor when comparing the tunneled with the nontunneled flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results show that anastomosing both DIEP flaps to a single set of mammary vessels is safe and reliable. The authors conclude that the retrograde flow through the distal internal mammary artery is sufficient for free flap perfusion and that subcutaneous tunneling of a free flap pedicle does not predispose to flap failure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

[Profunda femoral artery perforator flap: Anatomical study]

BACKGROUND

Within the framework of mammary reconstruction, since 2012 when Allen first described it, the profunda femoral artery perforator flap (PAP) takes an important place in the current therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVE

This anatomical study aims to analyze the anatomy and morphologic consideration of the PAP : position of the perforating artery; length of the pedicle, area and volume of vascularization.

METHODS

Sixteen flaps were harvested on fresh subjects at the University Department of Anatomy of Rockfeller, Lyon. The first direct cutaneous branch from the deep femoral vessels was located between or through the adductor magnus and gracilis muscles. Pedicle location, diameter, length and position regard to the great saphenous vein were recorded. A flap based on this vessel was designed. Height, width, and surface of the skin paddle were recorded. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography was used to analyze the area and volume of cutaneous territory supplied by the studied perforator.

RESULTS

On the 16 analyzed flaps, localization of the perforating artery is on average to 8.2cm of the pubic tuber and 3.7cm behind a line connecting the pubic tuber to the internal femoral condyle. The length of the pedicle is on average of 11.7cm and the average area of skin perfused was 94,68cm². The way of this perforating arterty is primarily through the adductor magnus. On the radiological images of the 8 flaps, the analysis shows an average surface of 111,25cm² and a mean volume of 325.3cm³.

DISCUSSION

PAP is an interesting therapeutic choice within the framework of a mammary reconstruction. Its surface and its volume associated with a discrete scar make a valid indication within the framework of this surgery.

Preoperative cross-sectional mapping for deep inferior epigastric and profunda artery perforator flaps

Perforator flap-based breast reconstruction in a post mastectomy patient requires dissection of the artery-vein bundle (perforators) responsible for perfusion of the subcutaneous fat and skin of the flap. Traditionally, these reconstructions were performed with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, but autologous breast reconstruction using muscle sparing free flaps has become steadily more popular in recent years. Preoperative imaging to locate and evaluate candidate perforators has become an essential step before patients undergo the microsurgical procedure. Preoperative mapping assists with operative planning, reduces operating times, and brings anatomical variations to their attention. Pre-operative imaging also assists in choosing the appropriate donor site for harvesting flaps. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have been widely used for this type of preoperative imaging. Both MRA and CTA have their inherent advantages and disadvantages, and the preferred modality for this purpose varies by institution based on factors such as scanner availability, radiologist and surgeon experience, and comfort in interpreting the images. Concerns over excessive exposure to ionizing radiation and poor iodinated contrast agent enhancement of the intramuscular perforator course has made MRA the first-choice imaging modality in many centers. The purpose of the article is to review technique and protocols for the pre-operative CTA/MRA in patients who are being considered for a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap and to familiarize the reader with the normal and variant anatomic features of the deep inferior epigastric and PAP vessels along with the anatomic and surgical considerations used in the selection of perforator flap donor site for breast reconstruction post mastectomy.

New surgical technique: Simultaneous use of contiguous intercostal spaces during total rib preservation exposure of the internal mammary vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Microvascular free tissue transfer is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. For many surgeons, the internal mammary vessels (IMV) are the preferred recipient vessels. The merits of the rib preservation technique have been previously discussed. There are, however, instances in which greater access than afforded by one intercostal space (ICS) may be required, for example, multiple or redo anastomoses or inadvertent recipient vessel damage. We therefore have refined this technique further to allow exposure of two ICSs without sacrifice of the intervening rib cartilage.

METHOD

We identified all patients who had simultaneous contiguous ICSs dissected whilst preserving the intervening costal cartilage for microvascular anastomoses for breast free flaps. The indications, surgical technique, and its refinements are described.

RESULTS

Simultaneous exposure of the IMVs in both the second and third ICSs whilst preserving the intervening costal cartilage for microvascular anastomoses was successfully performed in 15 patients with no flap failures. Indications included bipedicled DIEP flaps (9), bipedicled DIEA/SIEA flap (1), stacked DIEP flaps (4), and salvage (1). One flap was successfully re-explored for venous congestion. There were no intraoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that simultaneous contiguous ICS exposure of the internal mammary recipient vessels with total rib preservation is technically feasible, has no adverse patient sequelae, and has the benefit of allowing multiple anterograde and retrograde microvascular anastomoses (even in patients with narrow ICSs). This technique preserves the intervening rib and is of particular utility in bipedicled flaps when multiple "extra-flap" anastomoses may be required.

The Stacked Hemiabdominal Extended Perforator Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Options for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction in thin women are limited. The aim of this study was to introduce a novel approach to increase abdominal flap volume with the stacked hemiabdominal extended perforator (SHAEP) flap. The authors describe the surgical technique and analyze their results.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of all SHAEP flap breast reconstructions performed since February of 2014. Patient demographics, operative details, complications, and flap reexplorations were recorded. The bipedicled hemiabdominal flap was designed as a combination of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and a second, more lateral pedicle: the deep or superficial circumflex iliac perforator vessels, the superficial inferior epigastric artery, or a lumbar artery or intercostal perforator.

RESULTS

A total of 90 SHAEP flap breast reconstructions were performed in 49 consecutive patients. Median operative time was 500 minutes (range, 405 to 797 minutes). Median hemiabdominal flap weight that was used for reconstruction was 598 g (range, 160 to 1389 g). No total flap losses were recorded. Recipient-site complications included partial flap loss (2.2 percent), hematoma (3.3 percent), fat necrosis (2.2 percent), and wound problems (4.4 percent). Minor donor-site complications occurred in five patients (10.2 percent). Most flaps were harvested on a combination of the DIEP and deep circumflex iliac artery vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the SHAEP flap is an excellent option for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction in women who require significant breast volume but have insufficient abdominal tissue for a bilateral DIEP flap. The bipedicled SHAEP flap allows for enhanced flap perfusion, increased volume, and abdominal contour improvement using a single abdominal donor site.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Comparative Study of Choke Vessel Reconstruction With Single and Multiple Perforator-Based Flaps on the Murine Back Using Delayed Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Choke vessels, vascular anastomosis between adjacent angiosome, play an important role in flap expansion and survival. Here we established a flap model with single and multiple perforators to detect and compare the changes in choke vessels, discuss the effect of hemodynamics on the vascular morphology, and explore the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

One hundred mice (7-8 weeks) were subjected to a "choke zone" surrounded by 4 perforators on their backs. Delayed surgery was performed by the ligation of 1, 2, or 3 perforators to establish flap models. The blood flow of the choke zone was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry preoperatively and 6 hours and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days. The morphological changes of choke vessels in the choke zone were observed by gross and histological analyses. Levels of angiogenesis-related markers such as endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), metalloproteinase 2, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), and intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM-2) were detected by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Blood flow and microvascular count were obviously increased postoperatively and peaked and were maintained for 1 week (P < 0.01). Meanwhile, the diameters of the choke vessels expanded. The eNOS level was increased at 7 days (P < 0.05); however, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results showed that the HIF-1α and ICAM-2 levels were decreased at 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) The delayed surgery that kept a single perforator had the greatest impact on the choke zone. (2) Changes in choke vessels were closely related to the shear stress caused by enhanced blood perfusion after surgery. (3) Choke vessel growth was regulated by eNOS, metalloproteinase 2, HIF-1α, and ICAM-2.

Creation of a Central Under Flap Pocket Allows Secondary Implant Augmentation of Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

Background:

When a single perforator flap does not provide adequate volume or projection for satisfactory breast reconstruction, the addition of an implant may be considered at the time of second-stage revisions. Dissection of an implant pocket beneath the flap may lead to the inadvertent injury of the flap pedicle as the tissue planes have been obscured by tissue ingrowth. The authors present a technique in which the boundaries of the implant pocket are predetermined at the time of flap reconstruction allowing an implant to be inserted at the second stage in ideal position with greater ease of dissection and minimal risk to the flap pedicle.

Methods:

Forty patients (80 bilateral perforator flap breast reconstructions) treated with the creation of central under flap pocket technique in anticipation of subsequent sub flap implant augmentation within an 18-month period were assessed retrospectively.

Results:

Sixty-eight patients with flaps (85%) went on to receive secondary augmentation with silicone implants. The average percentage increase in volume contributed by the implant was 41%. The undersurface of the acellular dermal matrix was readily identified, and its medial most extent safely determined, allowing the expeditious recreation of the predelineated central under-flap implant pocket. No flap pedicles were injured during the process, and the implants were placed in a favorable position providing maximum projection to the reconstruction. No subsequent development of fat necrosis was identified after augmentation.

Conclusion:

The creation of central under flap pocket technique allows for safe, effective, and expedient delayed implant augmentation of perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Supermicrosurgery: History, Applications, Training and the Future

Supermicrosurgery, a technique of dissection and anastomosis of small vessels ranging from 0.3 to 0.8 mm, has revolutionized the fields of lymphedema treatment and soft tissue reconstruction. The technique offers several distinct benefits to microsurgeons, including the ability to manipulate small vessels that were previously inaccessible, and to minimize donor-site morbidity by dissecting short pedicles in a suprafascial plane. Thus, supermicrosurgery has become increasingly popular in recent years, and its applications have greatly expanded since it was first introduced 20 years ago. While supermicrosurgery was originally developed for procedures involving salvage of the digit tip, the technique is now routinely used in a wide variety of microsurgical cases, including lymphovenous anastomoses, vascularized lymph node transfers and perforator-to-perforator anastomoses. With continued experimentation, standardization of supermicrosurgical training, and high quality studies focusing on the outcomes of these novel procedures, supermicrosurgery can become a routine and valuable component of every microsurgeon's practice.

The Pedicled LICAP Flap Combined with a Free Abdominal Flap In Autologous Breast Reconstructions

Background

Previous surgery or slim body configuration can limit the size of the available abdominal flap in autologous breast reconstruction. However, redundant skin and subcutaneous tissue lateral to the mastectomy site can be utilized as the pedicled lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap. This study evaluates the combination of a free abdominal flap and a pedicled LICAP flap to achieve increased breast size and improved cosmetic outcome.

Methods

Patients undergoing secondary autologous breast reconstruction were included in a prospective study. The combination with a LICAP flap was used for women with insufficient abdominal flap tissue in relation to the desired breast size. The authors also assessed their modification of the original lateral thoracodorsal flap design to improve the aesthetic outcome.

Results

In 109 patients, 121 free abdominal flaps were performed. The combination with a pedicled LICAP flap was used in 82 free abdominal flap reconstructions (68%). The LICAP flap provided additional volume and resulted in better projection and ptosis of the neo-mamma. The overall complication rate for the LICAP flaps was 26 %; all minor complications. Despite combining flaps, the majority of patients needed additional surgery to improve breast symmetry. Breast reduction of the native breast was the most common symmetrizing procedure.

Conclusion

In selected patients with insufficient abdominal flap tissue, a combination of a free abdominal flap and a pedicled LICAP flap is a valuable option to increase breast size and cosmetic outcome. Additional symmetrizing surgery might still be necessary.

What's the remedy for the distal necrosis of DIEP flap, better venous drain or more arterial supply?

Background

We developed a novel pedicled DIEP flap model in rat to explore the possible remedy for the distal necrosis of the flap.

Methods

A deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, based on the second right cranial perforator (P2) as the main pedicle, was elevated in 48 Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were randomized into 4 groups: group I, the left P2 remaining intact as supercharging; group II, the left P2 artery alone kept as supercharging; group III, the left P2 vein alone kept as supercharging; group IV, no supercharging. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (TcPCO₂) were measured immediately after flap elevation, protein level of Hif-1a was measured 48 hours later, and flap survival was assessed 7 days postoperatively.

Results

Blockade of artery led to significantly lower TcPO₂, higher TcPCO₂, and higher expression level of Hif-1a in the distal side of the flap in group III and group IV, than those of group I and group II. At 7 days post surgery, significantly lower flap survival rates were observed in group III (81.9 ± 5.7%) and group IV (78.4 ± 6.5%), compared to observed in group I (97.2 ± 3.0%) and group II (94.2 ± 6.2%).

Conclusions

It might be arterial insufficiency, not venous congestion, which mainly caused the distal necrosis of the DIEP flap in rat. Arterial instead of venous supercharging might be a more effective procedure that improves circulation to zone IV of the flap.

Autologous fat transfer to the subcutaneous tissue in the context of breast reconstructive procedures

Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is an appropriate technique for aesthetic rejuvenation of the face, aesthetic enhancement of hands, correction of the facial appearance in various disorders and constitutes a surgical alternative of treatment of numerous breast deformities ranging from distorting posttraumatic scars, post-eczema lesions, post-burn deformities to partial or total breast reconstruction. Our work is aimed to familiarize dermatologists with the technique of harvesting and implanting the aspirate of adipose cells in patients consulted for deformities of the breast. In addition, the review summarizes the most common applications of AFT in the breast reconstructive procedures. In summary, AFT is an oncologically safe, relatively complication-free, minimally invasive surgical technique, which can be used to correct a wide range of deformities, which are commonly seen by dermatologists, in the area of the face, trunk and extremities. The procedure can correct a wide range of breast deformities, from contour or single quadrant deformities up to the state after mastectomy.