A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation

Breast Conserving Therapy for Patients With Prior Cosmetic Implant-Based Breast Augmentation: Outcomes and Comparison Against a Matched Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists regarding potential increased toxic effects in patients with cosmetic implant-based augmentation (CIBA) who receive radiation therapy. We evaluated acute and chronic toxic effects associated with radiation therapy in women with prior CIBA treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) as part of breast conserving therapy (BCT) and compared these results against a cohort of patients without prior breast augmentation who received similar therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with a prior history of CIBA who subsequently underwent BCT with WBI. The control group consisted of consecutively treated patients without prior CIBA who also underwent BCT with WBI. Analyses included a comparison of baseline and treatment-associated factors between the augmentation and control groups, evaluation of toxic effects between both groups, and multivariable analysis of factors associated with the receipt of additional surgery following radiation.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with prior CIBA and 135 consecutively treated patients without CIBA were identified. Patients with prior CIBA were treated from 2006 through 2019, and patients without CIBA were treated from 2016 through 2019, though treatment characteristics and median follow-up time were similar between the two groups. Patients with prior CIBA were significantly less likely to experience acute moist desquamation (0% vs. 18%; P = .005). There were otherwise no statistically significant differences in acute (≤ 6 months) or chronic (> 6 months) toxic effects between the two groups. Rates of excellent/good chronic cosmetic outcome were 89% for the CIBA group and 97% in the control group (P = .094). On multivariable analysis, patients without prior CIBA (OR = 0.04; CI = 0.01-0.13; P < .001) and patients treated with moderately hypofractionated irradiation (OR = 0.08; CI = 0.02-0.23; P < .001) were significantly less likely to undergo additional surgery following receipt of WBI. Two patients experienced implant loss following radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

WBI as part of BCT in patients with prior implant-based breast augmentation appears safe and is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes. There was an increased need for additional surgery in patients with prior CIBA, but rates of acute and chronic toxic effects appeared similar to those in nonaugmented patients.

From Case Reports to Molecular Insight: Examining the Outcomes and Underlying Mechanisms of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Breast Implant Patients-A Systematic Review

There is extensive coverage in the existing literature on implant-associated lymphomas like anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, but breast implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma (BIA-SCC) has received limited scholarly attention since its first case in 1992. Thus, this study aims to conduct a qualitative synthesis focused on the underexplored association between breast implants and BIA-SCC. A systematic review was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify all currently reported cases of BIA-SCC. Additionally, a literature review was performed to identify potential biochemical mechanisms that could lead to BIA-SCC. Studies were vetted for quality using the NIH quality assessment tool. From an initial pool of 246 papers, 11 met the quality criteria for inclusion, examining a total of 14 patients aged between 40 and 81 years. BIA-SCC was found in a diverse range of implants, including those with smooth and textured surfaces, as well as those filled with saline and silicone. The condition notably manifested a proclivity for aggressive clinical progression, as evidenced by a mortality rate approximating 21.4% within a post-diagnostic interval of six months. Our literature review reveals that chronic inflammation, driven by various external factors such as pathogens and implants, can initiate carcinogenesis through epigenetic modifications and immune system alterations. This includes effects from exosomes and macrophage polarization, showcasing potential pathways for the pathogenesis of BIA-SCC. The study highlights the pressing need for further investigation into BIA-SCC, a subject hitherto inadequately addressed in the academic sphere. This necessitates the urgency for early screening and intervention to improve postoperative outcomes. While the review is confined by its reliance on case reports and series, it serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors.

Exploration of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Silicone Breast Implant Rupture Detection and Classification

Background and Objectives: The surge in breast-related surgeries in Korea underscores the critical need for an accurate early diagnosis of silicone breast implant-related issues. Complications such as BIA-ALCL and BIA-SCC add complexity to breast health concerns, necessitating vigilant monitoring. Despite advancements, discrepancies persist between ultrasonographic and pathologic classifications of silicone implant ruptures, highlighting a need for enhanced diagnostic tools. This study explores the reliability of ultrasonography in diagnosing silicone breast implant ruptures and determining the extent of silicone migration, specifically with a focus on guiding potential capsulectomy based on pathology. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of medical records encompassing 5557 breast implants across 2790 patients who underwent ultrasound-assisted examinations was conducted. Among the screened implants, 8.9% (249 cases) were diagnosed with silicone breast implant rupture through ultrasonography. Subsequently, 89 women underwent revisional surgery, involving capsulectomy. The pathological analysis of 111 periprosthetic capsules from these cases aimed to assess the extent of silicone migration, and the findings were juxtaposed with the existing ultrasonographic rupture classification. Results: The diagnostic agreement between preoperative sonography and postoperative findings reached 100% for silicone breast implant ruptures. All eighty prosthetic capsules exhibiting a snowstorm sign in ultrasonography demonstrated silicone migration to capsules upon pathologic findings. Conclusions: High-resolution ultrasonography emerged as a valuable and reliable imaging modality for diagnosing silicone breast implant ruptures, with a notable ability to ascertain the extent of free silicone migration to capsules. This diagnostic precision is pivotal in informing decisions about potential capsulectomy during revisional surgery. The study advocates for an update to the current binary ultrasonographic classification, suggesting a more nuanced categorization into three types (subcapsular, intracapsular, and extracapsular) based on pathology.

Safe Augmentation Mastopexy: Review of 500 Consecutive Cases Using a Vertical Approach and Muscular Sling

Background

Augmentation mastopexy remains a challenging surgery and has been frequently associated with suboptimal outcomes and remarkable reoperation rates, and one of the greatest challenges in mastopexy surgery is areolar lift, especially when implants are simultaneously used. Through the authors' experience, this study is aimed to show a modification of the vertical approach with greater safety of the areolar pedicle.

Methods

The study included all patients who underwent augmentation mastopexy surgery performed by the authors between 2019 and 2022, whether primary or nonprimary, and performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent this procedure.

Results

The length of the areolar lift ranged from 0 cm to 14 cm. Among the 17.4% of nonprimary mastopexies, the longest areolar lift was 11 cm. No cases of nipple-areola complex ischemia/necrosis were observed. With this technique, there were 6.2% complications (n = 31), none of which were considered serious.

Conclusions

This surgical sequence is a safe option for areolar lift in augmentation mastopexy. The vertical approach also has the advantage of producing considerably shorter horizontal scars. It is also reproducible, keeping the implant stable, which results in consistent long-term results.

Topical Tranexamic Acid in Primary Breast Augmentation Surgery: Short- and Long-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation mammaplasty (BAM) remains the most popular cosmetic procedure done worldwide. Bleeding in this procedure increases the chance of capsular contracture. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, has been widely used by other surgical specialties to reduce bleeding.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the use of TXA in BAM surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-surgeon case series of all patients who underwent primary BAM from March 2017 to March 2018 and received topical TXA spray to the implant pocket before implant insertion. Early postoperative complications and long-term outcomes, such as capsular contracture and revisional surgery, were recorded and described.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in the study with an overall complication rate of 2.8% over 5 years. No patients had postoperative bleeding or hematoma formation. One patient had a seroma, managed with ultrasound drainage. Complications requiring reoperation included rippling (3, 1.0%), pocket revision (2, 0.7%), capsule contracture (1, 0.3%) and rupture (1, 0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the safety and potential benefits of the use of topical TXA in breast augmentation, with low bleeding and capsular contracture rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Impact of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Complications and Aesthetic Results: A 5-Year, Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Increasing adoption of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) has raised expectations regarding postoperative outcomes and aesthetic results. BMI has been extensively explored as a predictor of complications. This study is the first to examine complication rates in underweight subjects, and compares these rates among underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of BMI on postoperative complications and aesthetic results in IBR following mastectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis encompassed patients undergoing mastectomy with subsequent IBR, performed by a collaborative team of breast and plastic surgeons. Demographics, treatment specifics, and outcomes were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression models. Significance was determined at P < .05.

RESULTS

In total, 1046 IBRs were performed in 921 patients, of whom 63 had a BMI <18.5 kg/m2, 572 were normal weight, 215 were overweight, and 71 were obese. Significantly higher complication rates were observed in both obese and overweight patients compared with normal-weight patients (P < .001). Each unit increase in BMI correlated to 7% increased odds of overall complications and 13% increased odds of reconstructive failure. Underweight individuals had higher capsular contracture rates than normal-weight patients, 14.3% vs 3.65%, respectively (P = .001). In addition, aesthetic complications rates in underweight patients were higher than in normal-weight patients, 36.4% vs 25.7%, respectively (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed BMI to be a strong predictor of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes, and demonstrates that low BMI has a significant impact on the incidence of capsular contracture and aesthetic complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Associated Factors and Prevention of Upper Pole Rippling in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction

Background  Despite its many advantages, prepectoral breast reconstruction also carries the risk of implant rippling. The recent introduction of partial superior implant coverage using a pectoralis muscle slip in prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has shown the potential to minimize upper pole rippling. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with rippling and the effectiveness of our surgical technique. Methods  In total, 156 patients (186 breasts) who underwent prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction between August 2019 and March 2021 were identified retrospectively. Patient data were analyzed from medical records. Univariable and multivariable logistic analyses were performed to contextualize the risks associated with rippling deformity relative to demographic characteristics and other clinical factors. Retrospective propensity-matched analysis was performed to identify the relationship between rippling deformity and the reconstruction method. Results  Patients with body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR], 0.736; p  < 0.001), those with a postoperative chemotherapy history (OR, 0.324; p  = 0.027) and those who received breast reconstruction via the superior coverage technique (OR, 0.2; p  = 0.004), were less likely to develop rippling deformity. The median follow-up period was 64.9 weeks, and there were no significant differences between patients in types of mastectomy, implant, or acellular dermal matrix. Patients who underwent superior coverage technique-based reconstruction showed significantly reduced rippling (OR, 0.083; p  = 0.017) Conclusion  Patients with higher BMI and prior postoperative chemotherapy were less likely to develop rippling deformity. The superior coverage technique can be effective in minimizing upper pole rippling.

Quantification of Breast Volume According to age and BMI: A Three-Dimensional MRI Analysis of 400 Women

OBJECTIVE

Breast size alteration is the most common aesthetic surgical procedure worldwide. This study aimed to assess the correlation between breast volume and BMI or age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analyses were conducted utilizing 400 patients selected by a retrospective review of the archives at our institution. Epidemiological data and medical history were assessed. Adjusting for the age and BMI of patient from previously described cohorts, we calculated mean breast volumes per side and differences from the upper and lower percentiles to the mean volumes.

RESULTS

The patients had a median BMI of 23.5 (range: 14.7-45.6) and a median age of 51 (range: 24-82). The average total breast volume increased strongly with BMI (r=0.834, p<0.01) and moderately with age (r=0.305, p<0.01). Within a BMI range of 18-24, breast volumes in the 8th and 18th percentile differ on average by about 50 ml. One BMI unit increase in women with breast sizes in the 10th percentile accounts for a breast volume difference of about 30 ml.

CONCLUSION

BMI strongly correlates with breast size. To achieve natural results, preoperative consultation and planning of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery must recognize BMI as a major determinant of average breast size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical Management of Breast Amyloidosis

Amyloidosis is characterized by extracellular deposition of insoluble misfolded beta-pleated proteins. Amyloid disease involving the breast is rare and there is a paucity of literature guiding surgical management in caring for these patients. In this article we review medical and surgical management with an emphasis on post mastectomy breast reconstruction. We propose an algorithm for breast reconstructive options based on unique considerations in this patient population. An institutional database at the Medical College of Wisconsin was used to identify patients diagnosed with breast amyloidosis from 2011 to 2021. We utilized the electronic medical record to present patient demographics, diagnostic and treatment data regarding the medical and surgical management of these patients. Five women were identified with a median age of 70 years and a median follow up of 19 months (range, 9-80 months). All patients were diagnosed with light chain (AL) type of amyloidosis. Systemic amyloidosis was identified in 3 patients and localized disease was identified in 2 patients. Concurrent breast malignancy was identified in 2 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomies followed by breast reconstruction with both prosthetic and autologous techniques. Both prosthetic and autologous reconstructive techniques are safe in patients with amyloidosis, however careful consideration and preoperative work-up are warranted to avoid complications in this vulnerable population. Further studies are warranted to improve surgical outcomes in patients with amyloidosis involving the breast.

Nagor Impleo Round Silicone Gel Breast Implants: Early Outcome Analysis after 340 Primary Breast Augmentations

For decades, implant-based breast augmentation has been one of the most performed surgical procedures for cosmetic purposes around the world. Hence, novel manufactured implants should be critically investigated to prove them safe and effective. Here, the authors describe the first independently conducted clinical study on Nagor Impleo textured round breast implants. For this retrospective study, outcomes of 340 consecutive female patients undergoing primary cosmetic breast augmentation were analyzed. Demographic and surgical data as well as outcomes and complications were evaluated. Furthermore, a survey concerning effectiveness and aesthetic satisfaction after breast augmentation was examined. All 680 implants were placed in a submuscular plane with incisions at the inframammary fold. The main indications for surgery were hypoplasia and hypoplasia with asymmetry. The mean implant volume was 390 cc and the main type of projection was high profile. The most common complications were hematoma and capsular contracture (0.9 percent, respectively). The overall revision rate for complications was 2.4%. Additionally, almost all patients showed increased quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction after a breast augmentation. Hence, all patients would undergo breast augmentation again with these newly launched devices. Nagor Impleo implants demonstrate a low complication rate and high safety profile. Although high aesthetic satisfaction and quality of life results were achieved, analysis of an even larger series over a longer period of time would be beneficial to evaluate the reliability of this implant.

Breast augmentation under local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation

INTRODUCTION

This study of breast augmentations performed under local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation describes the outcomes and evaluates benefits and complications.

METHOD

From December 2005 until August 2019, 335 women consecutively underwent bilateral breast augmentation procedures. The anesthetic protocol consisted of an initial intravenous bolus of 1 mg midazolam and 0.25 mg alfentanil preoperatively. In 2017, this was changed to 2-4 mg midazolam intramuscularly, 1 mg midazolam intravenously, and 2.5 µg sufentanil intravenously. Intercostal blocks were injected at the midaxillary line into the intercostal spaces two to seven. The operating field was infiltrated with tumescent local anesthesia. Retrospective data extraction from patients' medical charts was done, registering demographics, dosage of anesthesia, surgical characteristics, complications, and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-one women underwent primary augmentation and 54 had implant replacement. The most common complications included suboptimal cosmetic results, asymmetry, and healing-related problems. The overall rate of reoperation was 16.1% within an average follow-up period of 2 years, ranging from 0 to 12.5 years. The majority of the reoperations were due to cosmetic reasons. The change in anesthetic regime was associated with a significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased need for supplementary medication with no increased risk of complications.

CONCLUSION

Breast augmentations in local anesthesia with intercostal blocks and light sedation can be performed safely and can serve as an alternative to procedures in general anesthesia.

Identifying Public Perceptions, Attitudes, and Concerns about Breast Implants and Their Complications: A National Survey

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based breast operations are among the most common plastic surgery procedures. This study assessed the baseline knowledge of common breast implant-associated complications, and their influence on consideration of breast implants among adult laywomen within the United States.

METHODS

Five hundred women were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Respondents self-reported demographics and experience with breast implants. Questions were asked addressing respondents' understanding of complications and concerns regarding breast implants.

RESULTS

Of the authors' cohort (average age, 37.8 ± 11.7 years), 12.0% had received breast implants, 72.8% knew someone with implants, and nearly 50% would consider receiving implants in the future. As many as 82.2% reported at least one concern influencing their consideration of implants: safety (75.2%), cost (70.0%), unnatural shape (43.3%), and feel (45.2%). Respondents not considering implants were significantly concerned by foreign body implantation ( P < 0.001). Almost 75% believed that implants last longer than 10 years. Following education about risks of capsular contracture and implant rupture, one-third of respondents considering implants and half of those unsure were "less likely" to receive implants. The majority were unchanged in their likelihood after learning about infection (74.4%) and implant migration (69.2%). Respondents with a history of implants were significantly less likely to believe there is strong evidence supporting the aforementioned complications ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The rising awareness surrounding breast implant safety has the potential to significantly impact perceptions and receptivity. This study identifies public perceptions of common breast implant-associated complications and primary long-term concerns, highlighting the importance of education on postoperative complications in informed consent and surgical decision-making.

Oncoplastic Augmentation Mastopexy in Breast Conservation Therapy: Retrospective Study and Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic techniques, in conjunction with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy, have been demonstrated to achieve good aesthetic results and cancer outcomes in the treatment of patients with macromastia or significant ptosis. This study evaluated a series of patients undergoing breast conservation with concomitant oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy and a contralateral augmentation-mastopexy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumpectomy for breast conservation were identified via a retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included patients with ptosis and preexisting breast implants or insufficient breast volume undergoing oncoplastic implant placement/exchange and mastopexy. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four consecutive patients (64 breasts, 4 unilateral procedures) were included in the study. Average age was 51.4 years, average body mass index was 27, and 38.2% were smokers/former smokers. The average operative time was 2.5 hours. Furthermore, 38.2% of patients received chemotherapy, and 82.4% of patients received breast adjuvant radiotherapy. The average length of follow-up was 11.7 months. In the sample that received radiation, the capsular contracture rate was 25%, with a 7.1% contracture revision rate. For the entire group, a total of 8 patients (23.5%) underwent revisions for either positive margins (8.8%), capsular contracture (8.8%), implant loss (2.9%), or cosmetic concerns (2.9%). One patient developed a pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncoplastic-augmentation-mastopexy is a safe technique with acceptable complication rates. This technique is best used for breast cancer patients with breast ptosis and a paucity of breast volume or preexisting implants who wish to pursue breast-conserving therapy. The revision rates are acceptable compared with single-stage cosmetic augmentation procedures as well as other oncoplastic techniques described in the literature, but patients must be clearly counseled on contracture risk.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 4973 Patients in China

BACKGROUND

The popularity of aesthetic breast surgery in China results in greater demand for assessing risk factors for complications and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and independent risk factors for postoperative complications following aesthetic breast surgery in China.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on 4973 patients who had aesthetic breast surgery between 2012 and 2021 was performed. Postoperative complications include minor complications (incision healing impaired, hematoma, or fat liquefaction) and surgical site infection (SSI), which were recorded within 30 days after surgery. The follow-up time was expanded to 1 year only after prosthesis implantation procedures. Potential risk factors including age, weight, length of hospital stay, operation time, volume resection, incision location, and other clinical profile information were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 4973 patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery, the minor complication rate was 0.54%, and SSI was 0.68%. Augmentation with prosthesis implantation had the highest SSI rate (4.23%), which was significantly associated with increasing age (relative risk [RR] 1.12; P < 0.01) and periareolar incision (RR 5.87, P < 0.01). After augmentation with autologous fat transplantation, postoperative antibiotic use (RR 6.65, P < 0.01) was an independent risk factor for SSI. After adjusting for weight, volume resection over 1500 g (RR 14.7, P < 0.01) was an independent risk factor for SSI of reduction-mastopexy surgery. The complication rate of reduction mammaplasty (1.01%) and gynecomastia correction was lower (0.75%), and there was no record of complication in mastopexy procedures (n = 161).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative complications following aesthetic breast surgery is low. Risk factors for complications mainly include increasing age, perioperative antibiotic use, periareolar incision, and extensive volume resection. Much more attention should be focused on those high-risk patients in clinical practice to decrease breast infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Correlation between Capsular Contracture Rates and Access Incision Location in Vertical Augmentation Mastopexy

BACKGROUND

Plastic surgeons commonly use one of three access incisions to place breast implants during vertical augmentation mastopexy, including inframammary, vertical, and periareolar. It is not known whether there is a correlation between capsular contracture and access incision location. The purpose of this study was to investigate in a single-surgeon series the incidence of capsular contracture associated with access incision locations in silicone vertical augmentation mastopexy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a vertical augmentation mastopexy between 2013 and 2017 were studied retrospectively. All patients underwent a standardized, dual-plane breast augmentation with smooth surface silicone gel implants. Patients were evaluated 1 year postoperatively by the Baker scale.

RESULTS

A total of 322 patients met study criteria. Eighty-four had periareolar access, 86 had vertical access, and 152 had inframammary access. There were no differences in patient age or mean implant size between the groups. The capsular contracture rate of the periareolar group was 5.36 percent; in the vertical access group, 3.48 percent; and in the inframammary access group, 1.64 percent. Capsular contracture rates correlated inversely to the distance to the nipple-areola complex, with the periareolar access rates the highest, the vertical access rates intermediate, and the inframammary access rates the lowest. Inframammary incisions were associated with lower capsular contracture rates than periareolar incisions when performed in conjunction with vertical augmentation mastopexy ( p = 0.043). Vertical access capsular contracture rates were intermediate between periareolar and inframammary groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should take into consideration the capsular contracture rates associated with access incision location when planning or performing vertical augmentation mastopexy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Pharmacological Approaches for the Prevention of Breast Implant Capsular Contracture

Capsular contracture is a common complication associated with breast implants following reconstructive or aesthetic surgery in which a tight or constricting scar tissue capsule forms around the implant, often distorting the breast shape and resulting in chronic pain. Capsulectomy (involving full removal of the capsule surrounding the implant) and capsulotomy (where the capsule is released and/or partly removed to create more space for the implant) are the most common surgical procedures used to treat capsular contracture. Various structural modifications of the implant device (including use of textured implants, submuscular placement of the implant, and the use of polyurethane-coated implants) and surgical strategies (including pre-operative skin washing and irrigation of the implant pocket with antibiotics) have been and/or are currently used to help reduce the incidence of capsular contracture. In this article, we review the pharmacological approaches-both commonly practiced in the clinic and experimental-reported in the scientific and clinical literature aimed at either preventing or treating capsular contracture, including (i) pre- and post-operative intravenous administration of drug substances, (ii) systemic (usually oral) administration of drugs before and after surgery, (iii) modification of the implant surface with grafted drug substances, (iv) irrigation of the implant or peri-implant tissue with drugs prior to implantation, and (v) incorporation of drugs into the implant shell or filler prior to surgery followed by drug release in situ after implantation.

Abdullah A, Alkhalidi H, Alrehaili M. Early onset of capsular contracture after breast augmentation with implant: report of two cases & review of literature

Capsular contracture (CC) is a local complication caused by an inflammatory reaction that leads to fibrosis. CC commonly occurs after one year of surgery. Hence, there has been no previously reported early onset of CC. Therefore, we report two unusual cases of early onset of post-breast reconstruction capsular contracture.

Single Center and Surgeon's Long-Term (15-19 Years) Patient Satisfaction and Revision Rate of Round Textured Eurosilicone Breast Implants

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic plastic surgical procedures, with over 250,000 procedures in the United States in 2020 alone. However, the safety of breast implants should be closely researched and monitored, especially in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term results of round micro-textured Eurosilicone (Eurosilicone S.A.S, Apt Cedex, France) Cristalline Paragel breast implants from a single-center, single-surgeon experience regarding both patient-reported outcome measures and revisions.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of 84 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with round micro-textured Eurosilicone Cristalline Paragel breast implants, either submuscular (dual-plane) or subglandular placed, between 2001 and 2004. All patients were contacted for informed consent, and after approval, the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire was sent and utilized to analyze patient satisfaction. In addition, objective data regarding revisions, including capsular contracture, rupture rate, pain, and/or aesthetic causes needing revision surgery, were analyzed.

RESULTS

High BREAST-Q scores (67%-100% for 0-100 scale variables and 66.0%-77.3% of the patients scored "very satisfied" on categorical variables) were found without clinically significant differences between patients with dual-plane-placed implants and subglandular-placed implants. The overall revision rate was 29.8%, also with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.317).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed high patient satisfaction and relatively low revision rates after 15 to 19 years of follow-up of round micro-textured Eurosilicone Cristalline Paragel breast implants. No clinically relevant significant differences were found between dual-plane and subglandular placement of the implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Treatment and Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Contracture in Breast Surgery With Prosthesis Using Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common long-term complication of breast surgery with prosthesis. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRAs) have been tested as a potential treatment; however, mixed results have been observed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to clarify the treatment and prophylactic capabilities of LRAs in the management of CC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the most popular English-language databases was performed to identify relevant primary publications. We included all studies that used the Baker scale to evaluate the treatment and preventive capabilities of LRAs.

RESULTS

Six eligible studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, totalling 2276 breasts, of which 775 did not receive LRAs and 1501 did. Final pooled results showed that LRAs could help manage CC with a risk difference (RD) of -0.38 with a corresponding 95% CI of -0.69 to -0.08, showing statistical significance at a Z value of 2.48, P = 0.01. Subgroup analysis based on the type of drug showed that only montelukast yielded statistical significance (RD = -0.27, 95% CI = -0.51 to -0.03, Z = 2.20, P = 0.03). Zafirlukast did not seem to influence CC. Further subgroup analysis based on treatment timing showed that prophylaxis was ineffective and only treatment for ongoing CC yielded statistically significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis proved that LRAs could be used in the management of CC. Only treatment for ongoing CC showed statistically significant improvements. Montelukast seemed to be more efficient with a safer profile for adverse effects, whereas zafirlukast yielded no statistically significant results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using ultrasonic assisted liposuction (UAL) to achieve sufficient breast symmetry allowing for the use of same sized implants in patients presenting for elective breast augmentation surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting for augmentation mammoplasty with breast asymmetry who underwent ultrasonic assisted liposuction in combination with implant augmentation. Pre-operative differences in breast volumes were determined using water displacement, and these measurements were compared to final lipoaspirates required to achieve symmetry. To estimate the volume of lipoaspirate required, we suggested to aim for twice the volume difference obtained by water displacement. The success of the procedure was measured by the ability to use the same size implants bilaterally.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this review. In 85% of patients, UAL was sufficient to permit the use of equally sized implants bilaterally. However, when different sized implants were required, the size difference between implants was not greater than 25 cc. The UAL was also effective in correcting minor ptosis and nipple position. The main observed disadvantage was prolonged bruising and swelling.

CONCLUSION

The use of UAL for correction of primary breast asymmetry with bilateral breast augmentation allows balancing of breast tissue volumes and the use of same size implants and eliminates the need for balancing mastopexy procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection

BACKGROUND

In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume.

METHODS

A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method.

RESULTS

Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size.

CONCLUSION

Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Hematoma After Non-Oncologic Breast Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Hematoma after non-oncologic breast surgery is a common concern requiring expeditious treatment. The purpose of this study is to perform an evidence-based review of perioperative factors that may contribute to hematoma in non-oncologic breast procedures.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed of non-oncologic breast procedures: breast augmentation, single-stage augmentation-mastopexy, mastopexy, and reduction. In total, 28 studies highlighting incidence and potential risk factors for hematoma were included; overall level of evidence was established regarding each perioperative factor examined and hematoma rate.

RESULTS

The hematoma rate in breast augmentation ranges from 0.2 to 5.7%. There is inconclusive evidence to support an association between pocket choice or incision location and hematoma rate (Level III) and no evidence of an association between implant type and hematoma (Level V). Single-stage augmentation-mastopexy may have a lower hematoma rate than augmentation alone (Level II). Hematoma may increase the risk of capsular contracture (Level III). In breast reduction, the hematoma rate ranges from 1.0 to 9.3%. Evidence of an association between incision choice and hematoma rate is inconclusive (Level III). Use of epinephrine-containing solution, pedicle choice, and resection weight do not appear to affect hematoma rate (Level V, II, and II, respectively). The use of postoperative drains and ketorolac do not affect the incidence of hematoma (Level I and III, respectively). Intraoperative hypotension may increase the risk of hematoma after breast reduction (Level III).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast hematomas are not uncommon complications. Current literature lacks ample evidence for risk factors for hematoma after non-oncologic breast procedures, warranting further, high-powered investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Histological Analyses of Capsular Contracture and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture is a severe complication to breast surgery with implants. Previous studies suggest multiple risk factors are associated with capsular contracture, but the etiology is still unknown. We performed a literature review to investigate existing studies on histological analyses of breast implant capsules and how clinical risk factors impact the capsule morphology.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in PubMed. Studies that performed histological analyses of breast implant capsules were included. Animal studies or studies with a study population of less than five patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were included. The histological analyses showed that the breast implant capsules were organized in multiple layers with an inner layer of synovial-like metaplasia which was reported to diminish in capsules with capsular contracture. The remaining layers of the capsule mostly consisted of collagen. The alignment of the collagen fibers differed between contracted and non-contracted capsules, and capsules with higher Baker grade were generally thickest and contained more tissue inflammation. Studies investigating capsules affected by radiotherapy found a more pronounced inflammatory response and the capsules were generally thicker and fibrotic compared with nonirradiated capsules.

CONCLUSIONS

The included studies offer valuable insights into the histological changes caused by capsular contracture and their relation to clinical risk factors. Further studies with larger sample sizes and more strict inclusion criteria are needed to further investigate implant capsules and the role of the synovial-like metaplasia for the development of capsular contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 .

Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery worldwide. Some of the most severe short-term complications after breast augmentation are hematoma and deep surgical site infection. However, these complications are relatively rare; therefore, large patient populations are required to perform statistical analyses. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the complications after primary breast augmentation with an emphasis on deep surgical site infection and hematoma.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women who underwent primary breast augmentation without the use of pocket irrigation between 2012 and 2019 in a single private clinic. A cumulative hazard function and a multivariate analysis on the risk of hematoma were performed.

RESULTS

We included 1128 patients in the study. Thirty patients (2.7%) developed postoperative hematoma after a median time of 14 h (IQR 5 h-9 days). Six patients (0.5%) contracted a deep surgical site infection after a median time of 14 days (range 4-41 days). Age, BMI, implant volume, or implant placement was not significantly associated with hematoma.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support that the risk of hematoma after primary breast augmentation is highest within the first 24 h after the surgery. This time period should be considered when planning postoperative care for these patients. We did not find an increased rate of deep surgical site infection compared with studies of breast augmentations with pocket irrigation. Further studies and meta-analyses are needed to explore the effect of pocket irrigation and other risk factors.

Higher Prevalence of Capsular Contracture with Second-side Use of Breast Implant Insertion Funnels

Breast implant insertion funnels have become popular adjuncts to breast implant surgery to reduce access incision length and contact of the implant with the skin of the breast. Although labeled as single-use devices, due to cost considerations, many surgeons use a new breast implant insertion funnel with each patient rather than each breast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of capsular contracture of the first augmentation side and compare it to the second side utilizing one insertion funnel per patient.

Breast Aesthetic Preferences: Analysis of 1294 Surveys

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic breast perceptions could be variable among cultures. Fullness, superior/inferior pole proportion and orientation and size of the nipple areolar complex are key elements in patient post-operative satisfaction and should be considered when planning breast aesthetic surgery.

METHODS

A descriptive study was designed, using an online survey, sent via social media. Standardized software modified images of breasts with different pole proportions, areolar nipple complex orientation and size were used.

RESULTS

From 1294 surveys collected, 1291 were analysed (969 women and 322 men). Significant differences in preferences of upper/lower pole breast proportions were found among groups of different age, gender, level of education and previous history of breast surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In the studied population, we found several variations in aesthetic breast preferences related to their demographic characteristics and for this reason we believe that this research may serve as a "macro" guide for both patient and surgeon in primary and secondary breast surgery. To our knowledge, this is the largest survey study concerning breast aesthetic preferences done in Colombia and second largest in the world.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up

Background:

Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years.

Methods:

This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure.

Results:

Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent.

Conclusion:

The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Therapeutic, IV.

Revision Breast Augmentation

Breast augmentation is consistently one of the most commonly performed aesthetic operations every year. Unfortunately, revision rates following primary augmentation remain as high as 36%. There are several causes for revision breast augmentation; however, the most common and challenging of these include capsular contracture, implant malposition, and ptosis of the aging breast following augmentation. Successful management of these problems requires knowledge on how to best treat the implant and capsule with the corresponding soft tissue simultaneously. While surgical management is important, understanding the pathological causes of these entities during the primary operation can reduce the need for revision. This article utilizes the most up-to-date literature to review the appropriate clinical evaluation and surgical management of these complex cases.

Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant Surgery: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?

Capsular contracture is the leading complication after surgery with breast implants. A lot of progress has been made investigating this complication over the years, and knowledge has been gained on this complication. Currently, the exact cause for capsular contracture is still unclear. It has been hypothesized that immunobiological factors (i.e., immunological and bacterial factors) and several risk factors play a central role in its development. In this paper, we give an overview of the known immunological factors that have been investigated in contracted and non-contracted capsules, as well as the role of bacterial formation around breast implants. We also report on risk factors that might increase the risk of capsular development. Lastly, it provides the latest research on this matter and discusses future perspectives as follow-up research is needed to unravel the pathogenic process leading to capsular contracture. This knowledge is of interest to establish medical therapies in order to prevent such side effects. Overall, capsular contracture seems to be a multifactorial condition consisting of several risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Clinical Outcomes After Hematoma Development: A Study of 627 Tissue Expander Breast Reconstructions

BACKGROUND

Hematomas after tissue expander immediate breast reconstruction (TE-IBR) pose a significant challenge during the recovery period. In this study, we aim to evaluate whether hematoma formation leads to subsequent complications and how management can impact final reconstructive goals.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of TE-IBRs from 2001 to 2018 was performed using an established breast reconstruction database. Demographics, medications, comorbidities, and complications were identified. Implant loss was defined as removal of the tissue expander/implant without immediate reimplantation during that operation. Hematoma size, management, transfusion requirement, reoperations, and final outcome were recorded. Reconstructive failure was defined as an implant loss that was not replaced with another implant or required secondary autologous reconstruction.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty-seven TE-IBR patients were analyzed. Postoperative hematoma (group 1) occurred in 4.1% (n = 26) of TE-IBRs and did not develop in 95.9% (group 2: n = 601). Group 2 had a higher mean body mass index (24.5 vs 27.3 kg/m, P = 0.018); however, there were no significant differences in smoking status, preoperative/postoperative radiation/chemotherapy, or other comorbidities. Group 1 was found to have increased rates of implant loss (15.4% vs 3.7%, P = 0.0033) and reconstructive failure (11.5% vs 2.8%, P = 0.0133) compared with group 2.Eighteen hematomas (69.2%) underwent surgical intervention (group 1a) compared with 30.8% (n = 8) that were clinically managed (group 1b). Group 1a had statistically significant lower rates of subsequent complications (22.2% vs 62.5%, P = 0.046) and reoperations (5.6% vs 27.5%, P = 0.037) than did group 1b, respectively.Lastly, 23.1% (n = 6) of patients who developed a hematoma were on home antithrombotics (group 1c) compared with 76.9% (n = 20) of patients with no antithrombotics (group 1d). There were statistically significant differences in transfusion rates (50% vs 0%, P = 0.001) between groups 1c and 1d, respectively. Differences in hematoma volume (330 vs 169.3 mL, P = 0.078) and reconstructive failure (33.3% vs 5%, P = 0.057) approached significance between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hematoma after TE-IBR should be monitored closely, as it may play a role in jeopardizing reconstruction success. Patients on home antithrombotic medication may be at increased risk of larger-volume hematomas and reconstruction failure. Plastic surgeons should consider aggressive surgical evacuation of postoperative TE-IBR hematomas to reduce subsequent complications and reoperations, thus optimizing reconstructive outcomes.

SEM and TEM for identification of capsular fibrosis and cellular behavior around breast implants - a descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND

Capsular fibrosis (CF) is the most common long-term complication in implant-based breast augmentation. It is well accepted that the foreign body response (FBR) instigates the development of fibrotic disease. Our study aims to compare murine and human samples of CF and describe the cellular and extracellular matrix (ECM) composition using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM).

RESULTS

Miniature microtextured silicone breast implants were implanted in mice and subsequently harvested at days 15, 30, and 90 post-operation. Isolated human capsules with the most aggravated form of CF (Baker IV) were harvested post-operation. Both were analyzed with SEM and TEM to assess cellular infiltration and ECM structure. An architectural shift of collagen fiber arrangement from unidirectional to multidirectional was observed at day 90 when compared to days 15 and 30. Fibrosis was observed with an increase of histiocytic infiltration. Moreover, bacterial accumulation was seen around silicone fragments. These findings were common in both murine and human capsules.

CONCLUSIONS

This murine model accurately recapitulates CF found in humans and can be utilized for future research on cellular invasion in capsular fibrosis. This descriptive study helps to gain a better understanding of cellular mechanisms involved in the FBR. Increases of ECM and cellularity were observed over time with SEM and TEM analysis.

Long-term Follow-up and Trends in Breast Augmentation in 527 Transgender Women and Nonbinary Individuals: A 30-year experience in Amsterdam

BACKGROUND

Transgender women and transfeminine spectrum nonbinary individuals may opt for breast augmentation. The aim of the study is to analyze the complications, surgical trends, and long-term follow-up of breast augmentations in this population over the past 30 years.

METHODS

All transgender women and nonbinary individuals who underwent breast augmentation at our center between 01-1990 and 01-2020 were retrospectively identified. A retrospective chart study was conducted, recording individual demographics, implant characteristics, surgical timing, postoperative complications or other reasons requiring reoperation, and implant survival. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE on clinical outcomes and revision surgery of this procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 527 individuals were identified. Median clinical follow-up time was 11.2 years (interquartile range 3.3-17.5). Median implant size increased significantly over the last years (1990-1990 median 275cc, 2000-2009 252cc, 2010-2019 375cc, p<0.01). Most individuals underwent breast augmentation and genital gender-affirming surgery in one-stage. Reoperations due to short-term complications were infrequent (hematoma (0.4%) or infection (0.4%)). Reoperations due to long-term complications comprised: implant rupture (5.7%), capsular contracture (4.9%), aesthetic problems (3.8%), low-grade infection (0.4%), or seroma (0.6%). In total, 2.5% of individuals requested larger implants. After performing the literature search and manuscript screening, 9 out of 115 identified studies were included for review. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 5.5 years. Reported complications requiring reoperation were capsular contraction (range 0.0-5.6%), asymmetry (3.6%), hematoma (range 0.0-2.9%), infection (range 0.0-0.9%) and implant rupture (0.7%), CONCLUSION: Implant-based breast augmentation is a safe procedure in transgender individuals.

Controllable Factors to Reduce the Rate of Complications in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic augmentation mammoplasties are one of the most demanded procedures performed in the aesthetic surgical sector. Because of the high epidemiological impact, the evaluation of measures to reduce the risk of complications is highly needed. The goal of this review is to evaluate the current literature for successful actions to reduce the risk of complications in aesthetic breast augmentation.

METHODS

We searched Medline-listed journals for "complications primary breast augmentation" and defined surgeon-dependent and patient-dependent factors within those.

RESULTS

Most of the strategies to reduce the risk of any complication are based on meticulous hygienic precautions and adequate training of the surgeon. The current literature suggests complications such as capsular contracture, infection and BIA-ALCL are closely linked with bacterial contamination and therefore can be avoided with different hygienic measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Observations Concerning the Match between Breast Implant Dimensions, Breast Morphometry, and a Patient-reported Outcome

Background:

Outcome studies in breast augmentation do not assess how an implant has been matched to the soft tissue envelope. The study hypothesis is that there is a relationship between breast and implant dimensions and the subjective outcome of patient satisfaction.

Methods:

In a study of patients undergoing subfascial breast augmentation (n = 341), morphometric measurements and a postsurgical survey of satisfaction with breast size were performed 3 months postoperatively. A ratio empirically derived from breast width, implant width, and projection (Rib) was calculated in patients who wished to have smaller, bigger, or no change in their implant size.

Results:

76% were content with breast size, 16.7% wished to be larger, and 7.3% wished to be smaller. Rib differed between groups who did not want to change size (n = 259, mean = 5.8, SD = 0.9), those who wished to be bigger (n = 57, mean = 5.6, SD = 1.1), and those who wished to be smaller (n = 25, mean = 5.3, SD = 1.3, H(341) = 14.0, P < 0.01). Rib differed between groups whose result was as expected (mean = 5.6, SD = 0.9), compared with those who expected to be bigger (mean = 5.4, SD = 1.2) or who expected a smaller outcome (mean = 5.6 SD = 1.0, H(341) = 18.3, P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

These data provide an objective measurement by which studies concerning breast augmentation can be reported and compared. The method may guide standardization of clinical research regarding breast implant surgery.

Galactorrhea/Galactocele After Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review

AIMS

To review cases of galactorrhea and galactocele postbreast augmentation, determine possible risk factors and consider management strategies of this rare complication.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in July 2019 searching Pubmed, Embase, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

The searches revealed 19 articles (17 case reports/series and 2 retrospective chart reviews) collectively comprising 38 women. The average age was 28 years, 42% were on oral contraceptives, whereas a quarter were nulliparous. The most common incision was periareolar (48%) followed by transaxillary (24%). The most common implant location was subglandular (57%) followed by subpectoral (37%). The average time to symptom onset was 61 days (range, 3-912 days) but only 3 cases presented more than a month after implant insertion. Twenty-one patients had galactorrhea, 7 had galactocele, whereas 10 women had both. Bilateral symptoms were present in 72% of cases, whereas hyperprolactinemia was present in only 62%. Management strategies included simple surveillance, antibiotics, dopamine agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, estrogenic agents, surgical washout, and implant removal (8 patients). The mean time to symptom resolution was 22.6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The numbers are too small for definitive conclusions but there is a weak suggestion that periareolar incisions, subglandular implants, prior hormonal contraceptive use, gravidity, and recent history of breastfeeding (<1 year) may be risk factors for galactorrhea/galactocele. Symptom onset is usually within 3 months. Treatments providing the fastest response (2 days) comprised of a composite approach (antibiotics, dopamine agonist, surgical drainage, and implant removal), whereas the use of estrogenic medications appeared to confer little benefit.

Drainage on augmentation mammoplasty: Does it work?

BACKGROUND

Breast prostheses could be associated with complications, despite many studies on surgical materials and techniques. The role of surgical drainage in preventing complications on breast prostheses surgery is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the role and effectiveness of vacuum drainage in the augmentation mammoplasty.

METHODS

A prospective multicentric randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted with 150 patients, who were the candidates for breast augmentation. The candidates were split into two groups to analyze the breast drain role. Group1: closed-suction drainage; measurements were taken every 24 h for 48 h. Group2: control (no drainage); all the patients were submitted to a clinical and postoperative ultrasonography evaluation (7th day and 3rd month). The late consultations (1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-year postoperative time) were carried out to identify any complication, such as infection, seroma, hematoma, asymmetry, hypertrophic scarring, rippling, implant position, visible edges, and sensibility alteration.

RESULTS

A total of 150 female patients were operated with 300 breast implants placed into subglandular pocket. In the first 24 h postoperative (D1), the drainage volume ranged from 12 ml to 210 ml (mean= 74.90 ml; SD= 43.29 ml). After 24 h, on the second day (D2), the collected volume ranged from 10 ml to 120 ml (mean= 44.76 ml; SD= 24.80 ml). The total drainage volume in the 48 h ranged from 22 ml to 320 ml (mean= 119.7 ml; SD= 62.20 ml). The breast ultrasonography series (BUSGS) analysis was done on the 7th day and 3rd month in both groups. There was no significant difference between G1 and G2 groups (p = 0.05 and 0.25, respectively). In the follow-up, some patients (33-44%) declared sensitivity disturbing on the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and lower breast segment.

CONCLUSIONS

The closed-suction breast drainage in breast augmentation was associated with high cost and time-consuming and not demonstrated any benefit in a recent postoperative time.

Risk Factors for Capsular Contracture: A Retrospective Study in Immediate Reconstruction versus Delayed Reconstruction

Capsular contracture is a common complication among breast implant reconstruction patients. The aim of this study was to assess the duration of and risk factors associated with capsular contracture by comparing 2 reconstruction methods.

Capsular contracture in the modern era: A multidisciplinary look at the incidence and risk factors after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture causes pain, poor cosmesis, and reoperations. This study analyzes its incidence and risk factors in a more modern treatment era.

METHODS

Patients undergoing mastectomy with implant reconstruction from 2010 to 18 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis evaluated rates and risk factors for capsular contracture.

RESULTS

Among 451 patients, the majority underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (262, 58.1%) with one-stage reconstruction (283, 62.7%) utilizing subpectoral implants (353, 77.4%) and acellular dermal matrix (354, 78.5%). Overall capsular contracture incidence was 9.8%; the rate after post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) was 18.7%, and 7.5% for patients without PMRT. Significant factors included neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.006), hematoma (P = 0.047), and PMRT (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that PMRT increased risk of capsular contracture (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.55-6.26, P = 0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy was protective (OR = 0.289, 95% CI 0.114-0.731, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of capsular contracture is lower than previously reported. Advancing therapeutic techniques may reduce the risk of this complication.

Prospective Study of Saline versus Silicone Gel Implants for Subpectoral Breast Augmentation

Background

Silicone gel implants are regarded as esthetically superior to saline implants, offering a more natural consistency. They are also considered less susceptible to rippling. However, objective measurements and patient-reported outcome studies are lacking. Similarly, minimal data are available quantitating animation deformity.

Methods

A 3-year prospective study was undertaken among 223 women undergoing primary subpectoral breast augmentation using either saline (n = 145) or silicone gel (n = 78) implants. Photographs obtained included frontal views with the patient flexing the pectoral muscles. Images were matched, and vertical differences in nipple position were measured. Breast implants were evaluated using high-resolution ultrasound to detect any ripples or folds at least 3 months after surgery. Outcome surveys were administered. Statistical analysis included the χ² test, point-biserial correlations, and a power analysis.

Results

Respondents reported visible rippling in 18% of women and palpable rippling in 32% of patients, with no significant difference between women treated with saline and silicone gel implants. Ripples were detected on ultrasound scans in 24% of women with saline implants and in 27% of women with silicone gel implants (difference not significant). Ripples were more common in women with lower body mass indices. Fifty percent of patients demonstrated nipple displacement <1 cm on animation. Nipple displacement occurred either up or down with equal frequency and a mean overall nipple displacement of zero.

Conclusions

Saline and silicone breast implants produce similar degrees of rippling, as determined on outcome surveys and ultrasound examination. Animation deformities tend to be minor and well-tolerated.

SMS-Split Muscle Support: A Reproducible Approach for Breast Implant Stabilization

BACKGROUND

Recent concerns regarding the association between macrotextured breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) have led to renewed interest in the use of devices with less texturing. Smooth implants appear to have a decreased risk of ALCL; however, low implant adherence has led to questions about implant stabilization and bottoming-out. The senior author has used a split muscle support (SMS) technique to help support the implant infero-laterally in over 380 breast augmentations and augmentation-mastopexy using smooth implants, with a low complication and reoperation rate.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 387 consecutive breast augmentation and augmentation-mastopexy patients operated on by the senior author over 24 months was performed. The SMS technique was classified in three grades according to amount of implant support by the pectoralis major muscle.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for an average of 13 months. Major complications occurred in seven (1.9%) patients, of which five (1.4%) were considered implant-related. There were one case of implant rotation and three cases of malposition during the transition from microtexture to nanotexture implants and one case of capsular contracture in a previously irradiated breast. Three post-massive weight loss patients required reoperation for further skin adjustment, and one patient requested upsizing of her implants at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMS technique is easily reproducible, adjustable intraoperatively according to patient characteristics, and helps stabilize breast implants. With increasing patient awareness regarding ALCL, the association of smooth implants along with the varying degrees of implant support afforded by SMS can help achieve a low complication and reoperation rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Primary Breast Augmentation Using Axillary Skin Incision, Submuscular Implants, and Intraoperative Tissue Expansion

BACKGROUND

Primary breast augmentation in small, pointed, or tubular breasts using axillary skin incision, submuscular cohesive gel implants, and intraoperative tissue expansion dramatically reduces complications.

METHODS

A 2.5- to 3.5-cm-long incision is made in the hair-bearing part of the axillae beside a natural fold. Incisions are opened using dissection away from the axillae, and an opening is made underneath the muscle on top of the thoracic cage. Blunt finger dissection is performed, and temporary breast expanders and special dissectors are inserted. The expanders create volume and desired breast shape. Sterility is ensured by entering implant pockets only with expanders and elevators and changing gloves before placing implants. No irrigation or antibiotic solution is used on implants or in the pockets. One thousand three hundred ten breast augmentations were performed between 2004 and 2019 (including a 2-year follow-up) using textured, cohesive round implants. Patients were followed up 3-4 months postoperatively. The parameters analyzed were size, shape, firmness, scars, and sensation in the nipple areola complexes. Patients contacted the clinic if problems occurred.

RESULTS

Of the 1,310 patients, only 2 had a Baker grade 3-4 capsular contraction. We also found 2 cases of implant rupture at the end of the 10-year guarantee period. Implants were replaced with identical ones. No infections were seen. Six cases of implant malposition were corrected by surgery. The total number of reoperations was 10 (0.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The axillary skin incision is an extremely efficient technique with few complications. The lymphatic drainage system is preserved, and implant pockets are left in a virgin state.

A 10-Year Follow-Up Experience of 383 Patients with Bilateral Smooth Inflatable Breast Implants Filled with Saline Solution

INTRODUCTION

In light of the concerns regarding the occurrence of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, seromas, and scar capsules, there appears to be merit in analysis and presentation of the results of our series of inflatable smooth implants filled with saline solution, for which the follow-up was more than 10 years.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We carried out a retrospective study, including all of the patients who underwent a first breast implant for cosmetic reasons, between 2003 and 2006.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients with 766 smooth implants filled with saline solution were included in our study. No cases of lymphoma and seroma were diagnosed. Eleven patients exhibited a postoperative hematoma, and four went on to develop a capsule. Twenty-two patients (5.7%) developed a Baker Grade III or IV capsule that required revision surgery. Two patients (0.5%) opted for a bilateral prosthesis replacement due to visual rippling. In total, there were 26 (3.4%) early deflations of prostheses.

DISCUSSION

There is not a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of hematomas and the formation of a capsule. We found a lower shell rate with smooth-walled versus textured implants. The fact of having a decline of 10 years allows to be exhaustive. As for wrinkling and ripples, their occurrence has not been increased by the use of inflatable retropectoral implants.

CONCLUSION

Smooth inflatable implants filled with saline solution have numerous advantages such as the possibility of a very small approach route and perioperative adaptability of the volume. In light of the lack of indication of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma with smooth implants, they are clearly an attractive alternative to textured implants filled with silicone gel.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Study on the Effects of Estradiol in Staphylococcus epidermidis Device-Related Capsule Formation

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture, mainly caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) biofilm formation, is a complex problem for breast cancer patients who undergo surgical prosthetic breast reconstruction. Estradiol has been reported to be involved in the formation of bacterial biofilms. Thus, the underlying mechanism of estradiol in capsular contracture needs to be investigated.

METHODS

Biofilm-related gene expressions were measured by qRT-PCR after sterilizing the silicone with bacterial suspension and E2 treatment in vitro. Rat models were established with bilateral ovariectomy operations and estradiol subcutaneous injections. The effects of estradiol on capsular contracture were detected by monitoring serum estradiol levels, bacterial infection rate in organs, biofilm formation and capsular contracture in vivo; inflammatory factors in vivo were examined as well. Biofilm on the silicone implants was observed under a scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

Both positive regulatory genes and negative regulatory genes were increased by the high concentration of estradiol, suggesting that estradiol can promote the formation of biofilm by not only positive but also negative regulations. High estradiol levels increased bacterial infection rate in organs, biofilm formation and capsular contracture. Further, high estradiol caused a large number of inflammatory cells to infiltrate and caused serious inflammatory reactions that aggravate the immune imbalances of the host.

CONCLUSION

High estradiol levels contribute to increasing capsular contracture caused by S. epidermidis biofilm formation.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Muscle Splitting Augmentation Mammoplasty: A 13-Year Outcome Analysis of 1511 Primary Augmentation Mammoplasties

BACKGROUND

Augmentation mammoplasty is a commonly performed procedure by plastic surgeons with a high satisfaction outcome. Muscle splitting augmentation mammoplasty was first described in 2007 and has been since used for primary and secondary augmentation mammoplasty as well as for primary and secondary augmentation mastopexy procedures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data for muscle splitting primary augmentation mammoplasties performed between October 2005 and October 2018 was carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 1511 patients had their primary augmentation mammoplasty consecutively performed in muscle splitting pocket. Mean age of the patient was 29.4 ± 8.56 years (range 18-67). Of the 1502 patients with documented implant sizes, 1272 patients had same-size implants, mean 340 cc ± 58.3 (range 170-700), and 230 patients had two different-size implants for correction of asymmetry. Of these 230 patients, mean implant size on right and left was 341 cc ± 61.5 (range 200-655) and 345 cc ± 67.4 (range 200-605), respectively. Of the 1495 known texturing, only 3.1% patients had smooth implants. Periprosthetic infection was seen in 10 patients, 38 patients had wound-healing issues and 5 patients had late seroma. Capsular contracture (CC) was recorded at three monthly, six monthly, one yearly and two yearly or longer period. Secondary procedures were performed for various reasons in 93 (6.15%) of the patients. Leading causes for revision were implant exchange in 33 (2.2%), to go for bigger size in 25 (1.65%), CC in 18 (1.2%) and implant rupture in 9 (0.6%). There was no ALCL recorded in the series.

CONCLUSION

Muscle splitting pocket for primary augmentation mammoplasty is a reliable, reproducible procedure with acceptable revision rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authorswww.springer.com/00266.

One-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Ten-Year Review of 2183 Consecutive Procedures

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies supporting breast augmentation with simultaneous mastopexy have been reported, concerns persist among surgeons regarding the safety of this procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 1-stage augmentation mastopexy by analyzing long-term complication and reoperation rates.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 1131 patients who underwent 2183 consecutive 1-stage augmentation mastopexy procedures from January 2006 to August 2016. Patient demographics, operative technique, and implant specifications were measured and analyzed with surgical outcomes. Long-term complication and reoperation rates were noted.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 43 months (range, 4-121 months), the overall complication rate was 15.3% (n = 173) with a reoperation rate of 14.7% (n = 166). Tissue-related complications included hypertrophic scarring in 2.5% (n = 28) and recurrent ptosis in 2.1% (n = 24). The most common implant-related complication was capsular contracture (Baker III or IV) in 2.8% (n = 32). The most common indications for reoperation were recurrent ptosis in 3.5% (n = 40 patients) and desire to change implant size in 3.2% (n = 36 patients). Circumareolar augmentation mastopexy technique was associated with a higher reoperation rate of 25.7% (P < 0.0005). Patients with a history of smoking had a higher incidence of complications (26.1%) and reoperations (22.5%; P < 0.0005). There were no cases of significant skin flap necrosis (>2 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage augmentation mastopexy can be safely performed with a reoperation rate that is significantly lower than when the procedure is staged. The effectiveness of this procedure is defined by a low complication rate and a reduced number of operations for the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

A Critical Analysis of Prosthetic Augmentation of Autologous Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

The combined approach using both an implant and autologous tissue for breast reconstruction has become more common over the last 10 years. We sought to provide a systematic review and outcomes analysis of this technique.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library database to identify studies that described implant augmentation of autologous flaps for breast reconstruction. The references of selected articles were also reviewed to identify any additional pertinent articles.

RESULTS

We identified 11 articles, which included 230 patients and 378 flaps. Implants used ranged in size from 90 to 510 cc, with an average size of 198 cc. Implants were more frequently placed at the time of autologous reconstruction and in the subpectoral plane. There were no total flap losses, and partial flap loss occurred in 3 patients (1%). There were no cases of venous or arterial thrombosis and no early return to the operating room for flap compromise. Eight implants (2%) were lost because of infection or extrusion, and capsular contracture occurred in 9 breasts (3%). When stratified by the timing of implant placement (immediate vs delayed), there were no significant differences in any postoperative outcomes except the immediate group had a higher infection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for women to be candidates for autologous tissue breast reconstruction can be expanded by adding an implant underneath the flap. We found the overall flap loss rate is comparable with standard autologous flap reconstruction, and the implant loss rate is lower than that in patients who undergo prosthetic reconstruction alone.

Epidemiologic Characteristics and Postoperative Complications following Augmentation Mammaplasty: Comparison of Transgender and Cisgender Females

Breast augmentation in transgender women can be an important first step in addressing gender incongruence and improving psychosocial functioning. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of augmentation mammoplasty in transgender and cisgender females.

PCR Characterization of Microbiota on Contracted and Non-Contracted Breast Capsules

BACKGROUND

The aetiology of capsular contracture around breast implants remains unclear. The leading theory is that a subclinical infection around the implant plays a role in the development of capsular contractions. Several studies found associations between the presence of bacteria and the occurrence of capsular contraction. However, it is unclear whether detected bacteria originate from the breast capsule, breast glandular tissue or skin contamination. Moreover, this has never been investigated with molecular techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the bacterial microbiota on breast capsules, glandular tissue and skin using a highly sensitive PCR assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty breast capsules were collected during implant removal or replacement. Ten specimens of glandular breast tissue and breast skin were collected in females who were undergoing reduction mammoplasty. A sample specimen (4 mm) was sterilely obtained from all tissues. All specimens were analysed by IS-pro, a 16S-23S interspace region-based PCR assay.

RESULTS

Low numbers of Staphylococcus spp. (four species in four capsules) were found on breast capsules. There was no difference in bacterial presence between normal and contracted capsules. The skin of the breast-harboured Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. while the glandular tissue was sterile.

CONCLUSION

The low numbers of bacteria found on the capsules are most likely caused by contamination during capsule removal. More and larger studies are needed to investigate the bacterial presence on breast capsules using a PCR assay. This is the first study in which breast capsules have been studied using a highly sensitive PCR assay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Vertical Augmentation Mastopexy with Implant Isolation and Tension Management

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

The increasingly popular vertical method of mastopexy is less commonly the technique of choice in augmentation mastopexy possibly due to concerns raised in the literature. The purpose of this report is to evaluate safety and satisfaction of the author’s variation of the vertical method in this combination surgery. It includes unique tension management steps and total implant isolation from cut parenchyma.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was done of 105 consecutive patients treated with the author’s method over an 8 year 6 month period. Clinical outcomes were examined, and a Breast-Q survey and Spear’s 2004 survey were mailed to all patients who agreed to it by phone.

Results:

There were no hematomas or delayed healing but one pulmonary embolus treated as an outpatient and one infection appearing 6 weeks postoperatively. There were only 3 grade 3 or 4 capsular contractures. Sixty-seven patients consented to the survey and 36 were returned. With Breast-Q, there was a mean score of 82.78 for outcome satisfaction and 75.94 for satisfaction with breasts. Spear’s survey confirmed high satisfaction with 90.9% indicating that they were satisfied or extremely satisfied. Comparison with Spear’s own surgical results did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions:

The author’s specific adaptation of vertical augmentation mastopexy appears to be very safe and successfully addresses a variety of healing, tension, and exposure concerns mentioned in the literature. Implant isolation may decrease capsular contracture rate. Both Breast-Q survey and Spear’s more specific survey indicate high patient satisfaction.