Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy on the Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival of Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Frequently, patients treated for Ovarian Cancer (OC) undergo menopause with subsequent symptoms. This review scrutinised the impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) on the Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of patients diagnosed with OC. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the most popular English databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select publications that evaluate OS and PFS in these patients. End-point analysis targeted values of log(HR) and its Standard Error (SE). Results: Up to 1 September 2022, 11 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Eight publications, totalling 4191 patients, were included in the meta-analyses. Eight studies were considered for the OS analysis and pooled an HR of 0.66 with respective 95% CI between 0.57 and 0.76, with a p-value < 0.00001 at a Z value of 5.7, in favour of the HRT group. Results for PFS showed an overall HR of 0.73 in favour of the HRT group; CI between 0.57 and 0.95, p = 0.02 at a Z value of 2.36. Further subgroup analyses highlighted the non-inferiority of this treatment. Conclusions: Patients treated for OC that receive HRT for menopausal symptoms after various treatments appeared to have better OS than never-users.

Meta-analyses reveal serum or plasma Interleukin-6 as a biomarker for malignant ovarian neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been implicated in various malignancies, including ovarian cancer. However, mixed results have been observed regarding IL-6 levels in different ovarian conditions. This meta-analysis was performed to determine IL-6 levels in the peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood among patients with various adnexal masses.

METHODS

Most popular English databases were searched using a predefined search formula. All studies comparing IL-6 levels in plasma, serum or peritoneal fluid of patients with benign tumors, ovarian neoplasms, and healthy controls were included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

5953 patients from 22 primary publications raging from 1994 to 2021 were included in the meta-analyses. A pooled IL-6 Mean Difference (MD) of 41 pg/mL for malignant tumors compared to benign ones, with a Confidence Interval (CI) between 19.8 and 62.2, a Z-score of 3.79, and statistical significance with a p = 0.0002 was observed. Pooled results for healthy versus benign ovarian conditions showed an MD of 5.45 pg/mL for serum or plasma IL-6 measurements in favor of benign tumors (CI:0.66-10.25, Z = 2.23 and p = 0.03). The analysis showed an MD for IL-6 levels of 19.59 pg/mL for healthy controls versus malignant ovarian tumors. Peritoneal fluid measurements regarding IL-6's levels showed no significant difference between benign or malignant masses.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of plasma or serum IL-6 in ovarian neoplasia patients compared to benign conditions or healthy controls identify IL-6 as a discerning factor between benign or malignant ovarian tumors and a potential biomarker for ovarian malignancy.

Treatment and Prevention of Periprosthetic Capsular Contracture in Breast Surgery With Prosthesis Using Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common long-term complication of breast surgery with prosthesis. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRAs) have been tested as a potential treatment; however, mixed results have been observed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to clarify the treatment and prophylactic capabilities of LRAs in the management of CC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the most popular English-language databases was performed to identify relevant primary publications. We included all studies that used the Baker scale to evaluate the treatment and preventive capabilities of LRAs.

RESULTS

Six eligible studies were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, totalling 2276 breasts, of which 775 did not receive LRAs and 1501 did. Final pooled results showed that LRAs could help manage CC with a risk difference (RD) of -0.38 with a corresponding 95% CI of -0.69 to -0.08, showing statistical significance at a Z value of 2.48, P = 0.01. Subgroup analysis based on the type of drug showed that only montelukast yielded statistical significance (RD = -0.27, 95% CI = -0.51 to -0.03, Z = 2.20, P = 0.03). Zafirlukast did not seem to influence CC. Further subgroup analysis based on treatment timing showed that prophylaxis was ineffective and only treatment for ongoing CC yielded statistically significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis proved that LRAs could be used in the management of CC. Only treatment for ongoing CC showed statistically significant improvements. Montelukast seemed to be more efficient with a safer profile for adverse effects, whereas zafirlukast yielded no statistically significant results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4