Neurocognition with maraviroc compared with tenofovir in HIV

CNS Viral Infections-What to Consider for Improving Drug Treatment: A Plea for Using Mathematical Modeling Approaches

Neurotropic viruses may cause meningitis, myelitis, encephalitis, or meningoencephalitis. These inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system (CNS) may have serious and devastating consequences if not treated adequately. In this review, we first summarize how neurotropic viruses can enter the CNS by (1) crossing the blood-brain barrier or blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier; (2) invading the nose via the olfactory route; or (3) invading the peripheral nervous system. Neurotropic viruses may then enter the intracellular space of brain cells via endocytosis and/or membrane fusion. Antiviral drugs are currently used for different viral CNS infections, even though their use and dosing regimens within the CNS, with the exception of acyclovir, are minimally supported by clinical evidence. We therefore provide considerations to optimize drug treatment(s) for these neurotropic viruses. Antiviral drugs should cross the blood-brain barrier/blood cerebrospinal fluid barrier and pass the brain cellular membrane to inhibit these viruses inside the brain cells. Some antiviral drugs may also require intracellular conversion into their active metabolite(s). This illustrates the need to better understand these mechanisms because these processes dictate drug exposure within the CNS that ultimately determine the success of antiviral drugs for CNS infections. Finally, we discuss mathematical model-based approaches for optimizing antiviral treatments. Thereby emphasizing the potential of CNS physiologically based pharmacokinetic models because direct measurement of brain intracellular exposure in living humans faces ethical restrictions. Existing physiologically based pharmacokinetic models combined with in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic information can be used to predict drug exposure and evaluate efficacy of antiviral drugs within the CNS, to ultimately optimize the treatments of CNS viral infections.

Brief Report: Intracellular Cystatin B Levels Are Altered in HIV-Infected Participants With Respect to Neurocognitive Status and Antiretroviral Therapy

ABSTRACT

With advances in HIV treatment, people with HIV (PWH) are living longer but experience aging-related comorbidities, including cognitive deficits, at higher rates than the general population. Previous studies have shown alterations in lysosomal proteins in blood from PWH with severe dementia. However, these markers have not been evaluated in PWH with milder neurocognitive impairment. We sought to determine whether levels of the lysosomal cysteine protease cathepsin B (CatB) and its endogenous inhibitor cystatin B (CysB) were altered in PWH with neurocognitive impairment and whether antiretroviral therapy (ART) further influenced these levels. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from the tenofovir arm of a multicenter clinical trial in which ART-naive, HIV+ participants received treatment for 48 weeks (ACTG A5303, NCT01400412). PWH were divided by neurocognitive status (eg, with or without neurocognitive impairment) before ART initiation. Intracellular levels of CatB and CysB were measured in T cells and monocytes by means of flow cytometry. Levels of CysB were significantly decreased in both CD4 + T cells and CD8 + T cells after 48 weeks of ART in HIV+ participants without neurocognitive impairment but not in participants with neurocognitive impairment. Levels of CysB were increased in CD14 + monocytes from the participants with neurocognitive impairment after ART. Levels of CysB and CatB positively correlated regardless of HIV, neurocognitive status, or exposure to ART. These findings suggest that CysB has the potential to provide mechanistic insight into HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders or provide a molecular target for systemic monitoring or treatment of neurocognitive impairment in the context of ART and should be investigated further.

Reduction in cerebral oxygen metabolism in subcortical regions may be a biomarker of cognitive decline in people living with human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and oxygen metabolism (rCMRO₂ ) in whole brain, white matter, gray matter and lenticular nuclei were studied in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) as well as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND).

METHODS

Treatment-naïve PLHIV underwent neurocognitive assessment and magnetic resonance (MR) measurement of rCBF and rCMRO₂ with repeat after 12 months of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Age- and sex-matched controls underwent single MR measurements. Regional CBF and rCMRO₂ were compared amongst symptomatic, asymptomatic, normal HAND and controls using analysis of variance. Longitudinal analysis of HAND worsening (≥1 category) was assessed after 12 months of ART and correlated with rCBF and rCMRO₂ measured by MR imaging using the paired-sample t test.

RESULTS

Thirty PLHIV completed baseline and 12-month assessments (29 with rCMRO₂ measurement). At baseline HAND assessment, 13% had no cognitive impairment, 27% had asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, 60% had mild neurocognitive disorder and none had HIV-associated dementia. At 12 months, 13% had no cognitive impairment, 20% had asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, 50% had mild neurocognitive disorder and 17% had HIV-associated dementia. In those without HAND worsening (N = 21) rCMRO₂ remained stable and in those with HAND worsening (N = 8) rCMRO₂ measurement declined from baseline to 12 months in white matter (2.05 ± 0.40 to 1.73 ± 0.51, p = 0.03) and lenticular nuclei (4.32 ± 0.39 to 4.00 ± 0.51, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In recently diagnosed PLHIV, no association was found between rCBF or rCMRO₂ and cognitive impairment at baseline. There was a reduction in rCMRO₂ in those with worsening of cognitive function at 12 months on ART. Reduction in rCMRO₂ may be a biomarker of cognitive decline in PLHIV.

Evaluation of Computerized Cognitive Training and Cognitive and Daily Function in Patients Living With HIV: A Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

In the era of antiretroviral therapy (ART), the incidence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) has not yet been controlled. With the exception of ART, there is no beneficial pharmacologic treatment. However, some studies have reported that computerized cognitive training (CCT) programs may improve cognitive function among people living with HIV.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between CCT programs and 8 domains measuring cognitive function (7 domains) and daily function (1 domain) among people living with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Records from the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to December 15, 2020. Supplementary searches to identify missing studies were conducted in Google Scholar using updated search terms from database inception to November 18, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that compared changes before and after a CCT intervention among people living with HIV were included. Search terms were a combination of words associated with HIV (eg, people living with HIV, HIV, and/or AIDS) and cognitive training (eg, cognitive intervention, nonpharmacology intervention, computer game, video game, computerized training, cognitive exercise, cognitive stimulation, and/or cognitive enhancement). Studies were included if they (1) used CCT as the primary intervention or combined CCT with other types of interventions; (2) used placebo, passive control conditions, traditional cognitive training, or single training tasks as control conditions; (3) reported changes between baseline and posttraining; (4) included participants 18 years or older; and (5) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were excluded if they (1) were not associated with HIV, (2) were research protocols or feedback reports, (3) were case reports, or (4) did not report findings for domains of interest.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Random-effects models were used to quantitatively synthesize the existing data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were the meta-synthesized changes in each domain after CCT.

RESULTS

Among 1245 records identified, 1043 were screened after removal of duplicates. Of those, 1019 records were excluded based on titles and abstracts, and 24 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 12 eligible RCTs were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. These RCTs involved 596 total participants, with 320 individuals in the CCT group (mean age, 47.5-59.7 years; 0%-94% female; 8.3-14.2 years of education) and 276 individuals in the control group (mean age, 44.2-60.0 years; 19%-90% female; 9.0-14.9 years of education). The average HIV inhibition ratio (the proportion of participants who achieved virological suppression) ranged from 30% to 100%, and the CD4+ T-cell count ranged from 471 to 833 cells/μL. The time since training ranged from 3 to 24 weeks. After receipt of CCT, function significantly improved in 6 of the 8 domains: abstraction and executive function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.26-0.91; P < .001), attention and working memory (SMD, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91; P < .001), memory (SMD, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .003), motor skills (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; P < .001), speed of information processing (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94; P < .001), and daily function (SMD, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86; P = .04). Sensory and perceptual skills (SMD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.36 to 0.48; P = .78) and verbal and language skills (SMD, 0.46; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.99; P = .09) did not significantly improve after CCT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This meta-analysis of RCTs found that CCT programs were associated with improvements in cognitive and daily function among people living with HIV. Future studies are needed to design optimal specific training programs and use implementation science to enable the transformation of CCT from a scientific research tool to a real-world clinical intervention.

Comparing Composite Scores for the ANAM4 TBI-MIL for Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

The Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (Version 4) Traumatic Brain Injury Military (ANAM4 TBI-MIL) is commonly administered among U.S. service members both pre-deployment and following TBI. The current study used the ANAM4 TBI-MIL to develop a cognition summary score for TBI research and clinical trials, comparing eight composite scores based on their distributions and sensitivity/specificity when differentiating between service members with and without mild TBI (MTBI).

METHOD

Male service members with MTBI (n = 56; Mdn = 11 days-since-injury) or no self-reported TBI history (n = 733) completed eight ANAM4 TBI-MIL tests. Their throughput scores (correct responses/minute) were used to calculate eight composite scores: the overall test battery mean (OTBM); global deficit score (GDS); neuropsychological deficit score-weighted (NDS-W); low score composite (LSC); number of scores <50th, ≤16th percentile, or ≤5th percentile; and the ANAM Composite Score (ACS).

RESULTS

The OTBM and ACS were normally distributed. Other composites had skewed, zero-inflated distributions (62.9% had GDS = 0). All composites differed significantly between participants with and without MTBI (p < .001), with deficit scores showing the largest effect sizes (d = 1.32-1.47). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was lowest for number of scores ≤5th percentile (AUC = 0.653) and highest for the LSC, OTBM, ACS, and NDS-W (AUC = 0.709-0.713).

CONCLUSIONS

The ANAM4 TBI-MIL has no well-validated composite score. The current study examined multiple candidate composite scores, finding that deficit scores showed larger group differences than the OTBM, but similar AUC values. The deficit scores were highly correlated. Future studies are needed to determine whether these scores show less redundancy among participants with more severe TBIs.

Developing an Executive Functioning Composite Score for Research and Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

Executive functioning encompasses interactive cognitive processes such as planning, organization, set-shifting, inhibition, self-monitoring, working memory, and initiating and sustaining motor and mental activity. Researchers therefore typically assess executive functioning with multiple tests, each yielding multiple scores. A single composite score of executive functioning, which summarizes deficits across a battery of tests, would be useful in research and clinical trials. This study examines multiple candidate composite scores of executive functioning using tests from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).

METHOD

Participants were 875 adults between the ages of 20 and 89 years from the D-KEFS standardization sample. Seven Total Achievement scores were used from three tests (i.e., Trail Making, Verbal Fluency, and Color-Word Interference) to form eight composite scores that were compared based on their psychometric properties and association with intelligence (IQ).

RESULTS

The distributions of most composite scores were mildly to severely skewed, and some had a pronounced ceiling effect. The composite scores all showed a medium positive correlation with IQ. The composite scores were highly intercorrelated in the total sample and in four IQ subgroups (i.e., IQ <89, 90-99, 100-109, 110+), with some being so highly correlated that they appear redundant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is part of a larger research program developing a cognition endpoint for research and clinical trials with sound psychometric properties and utility across discrepant test batteries. Future research is needed to examine the reliability and ecological validity of these composite scores.

Plasma Cystatin C Associates With HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder but Is a Poor Diagnostic Marker in Antiretroviral Therapy-Treated Individuals

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations between plasma cystatin C and neurocognitive impairment (NCI) and its performance as a diagnostic marker before and during initial antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression and generalized estimating equations examined associations with NCI, determined by neuropsychological measurements, in participants of a 48-week randomized clinical trial of initial ART. Receiver operator characteristic curves examined diagnostic models of NCI.

RESULTS

Cystatin C was associated with NCI before ART [odds ratio (OR) 3.4 (95% CI: 1.2 to 9.4) for each 2-fold increase in baseline levels] and during 48 weeks of ART, in models that excluded baseline measurements [OR 3.0 (1.2 to 7.8) for each 2-fold increase in time-updated levels]. The strength of association increased with more severe impairment using HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder criteria [OR 2.2 (0.8 to 6.0) with asymptomatic NCI and OR 4.0 (1.5 to 11.0) with mild neurocognitive disorder or HIV-associated dementia vs. no impairment, for each 2-fold increase in time-updated levels] or by global development score [OR 2.6 (1.1 to 6.3) with mild impairment and OR 4.6 (1.1 to 18.9) with moderate or severe impairment vs. no impairment]. Cystatin C performed poorly as a diagnostic marker for NCI, however, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.58 at baseline and 0.54 at week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher plasma cystatin C levels were significantly associated with NCI, but these levels did not seem to be useful as a diagnostic marker for this condition.

Clinical Treatment Options and Randomized Clinical Trials for Neurocognitive Complications of HIV Infection: Combination Antiretroviral Therapy, Central Nervous System Penetration Effectiveness, and Adjuvants

The etiology and pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus type-I (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain undetermined and are likely the produce of multiple mechanisms. This can mainly include neuronal injury from HIV, inflammatory processes, and mental health issues. As a result, a variety of treatment options have been tested including NeuroHIV-targeted regimens based on the central nervous system (CNS) penetration effectiveness (CPE) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and adjuvant therapies for HAND. NeuroHIV-targeted ART regimens have produced consistent and statistically significant HIV suppression in the CNS, but this is not the case for cognitive and functional domains. Most adjuvant therapies such as minocycline, memantine, and selegiline have negligible benefit in the improvement of cognitive function of people living with HIV (PLWH) with mild to moderate neurocognitive impairment. Newer experimental treatments have been proposed to target cognitive and functional symptoms of HAND as well as potential underlying pathogenesis. This review aims to provide an analytical overview of the clinical treatment options and clinical trials for HAND by focusing on NeuroHIV-targeted ART regimen development, CPE, and adjuvant therapies.

High Virologic Failure Rates with Maraviroc-Based Salvage Regimens Among Indian Patients: A Preliminary Analysis-Maraviroc Effectiveness in HIV-1 Subtype C

BACKGROUND

There is no information on the clinical effectiveness of Maraviroc (MVC) amongst People Living with HIV (PLHIV) in India infected with HIV-1 Subtype C viruses.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult PLHIV on MVC based Antiretroviral (ARV) regimens for at least 6 months. Maraviroc was initiated amongst PLHIV with documented R5 tropic viruses (determined by in-house population sequencing of the V3 loop in triplicate and interpreted using the Geno2Pheno algorithm) in combination with an Optimized Background regimen (designed using genotypic resistance testing and past ARV history). Plasma viral loads (PVL) are performed 6 months post-initiation and annually thereafter. Primary outcome d. Median duration on MVC treatment was 1.8 years (range 1-2.9 years) while median duration of ART prior to switching to MVC was 13 years. Maraviroc was combined with Darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) (n=10), Atazanavir/r (ATV/r) (n=2) and Lopinavir/r (LPV/r) (n=1). All PLHIV were infected with HIV-1 Subtype C. Only 23.3% PLHIV achieved virologic suppression at 6 months and sustained it for 2.3 years. Median CD4 count change from baseline was +117 (n=13), +228 (n=10), +253 (n=9), and +331 (n=4) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months respectively. Repeat tropism among patients with virologic failure demonstrated R5 virus.

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of virologic failure was seen when MVC was used amongst treatment experienced PLHIV infected with HIV-1 Subtype C in India. was the proportion of PLHIV with virologic success (PVL<50 copies/ml) at last follow up visit.

RESULTS

Data on 13 PLHIV were analyze.

Limited correlation between systemic biomarkers and neurocognitive performance before and during HIV treatment

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study A5303 investigated the associations between neuropsychological performance (NP) and inflammatory biomarkers in HIV-infected participants. Fifteen NP tests were administered at baseline and week 48 to 233 ART naïve participants randomized to maraviroc- or tenofovir-containing ART. Neurocognition correlated modestly with markers of lymphocyte activation and inflammation pre-ART (percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD4+) (r = - 0.22, p = 0.02) and percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD8+) (r = - 0.25, p = 0.02)), and with some monocyte subsets during ART (r = 0.25, p = 0.02). Higher interleukin-6 and percent CD38+/HLA-DR+(CD8+) were independently associated with worse severity of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) (p = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). More studies to identify HAND biomarkers are needed.

Similar neurocognitive outcomes after 48 weeks in HIV-1-infected participants randomized to continue tenofovir/emtricitabine + atazanavir/ritonavir or simplify to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorders can persist in many patients despite achieving viral suppression while on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Neurocognitive function over 48 weeks was evaluated using a Cogstate test battery assessing psychomotor function, attention, learning, and working memory in 293 HIV-1-infected, ART-experienced, and virologically suppressed adults. The ASSURE study randomized participants 1:2 to remain on tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) or simplify to abacavir/lamivudine + atazanavir (ABC/3TC + ATV). Neurocognitive z-scores were computed using demographically adjusted normative data and were classified as "impaired" (defined as either a z-score ≤ - 2 or having 2 or more standardized individual test z-scores ≤ - 1); while higher scores (equaling better performance) were classified as "normal". By z-scores, 54.7% of participants had impaired neurocognition at baseline and 50.2% at week 48. There were no significant differences (p < 0.05) in the baseline-adjusted performance between treatment groups for any individual test or by z-score. Specific demographic and medical risk factors were evaluated by univariate analysis for impact on neurocognitive performance. Factors with p < 0.10 were evaluated by backwards regression analysis to identify neurocognition-correlated factors after accounting for treatment, assessment, and baseline. Four risk factors at baseline for impaired neurocognition were initially identified: lower CD4 nadir lymphocyte counts, higher Framingham risk scores, and interleukin-6 levels, and a history of psychiatric disorder not otherwise specified, however none were found to moderate the effect of treatment on neurocognition. In this aviremic, treatment-experienced population, baseline-adjusted neurocognitive function remained stable and equivalent over 48 weeks with both TDF/FTC + ATV/r-treated and in the ART-simplified ABC/3TC + ATV treatment groups.

Changes in cerebral function parameters with maraviroc-intensified antiretroviral therapy in treatment naive HIV-positive individuals

BACKGROUND

Maraviroc-intensified antiretroviral therapy (ART) may be associated with cognitive benefits.

METHODS

Therapy-naive, cognitively asymptomatic, HIV-positive individuals were randomly allocated on a 1 : 1 basis to standard ART (Arm1: tenofovir-emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir) or maraviroc intensified ART (Arm2: abacavir-lamivudine and darunavir/ritonavir/maraviroc). Over 48 weeks, detailed assessments of cognitive function tests were undertaken and cerebral metabolites measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Our primary endpoint was mean change in cognitive function across treatment arms with factors associated with cognitive function changes also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 60 individuals randomized (30 Arm1 and 30 Arm2), 58 were men and 44 of white ethnicity. Treatment groups had similar disease characteristics including overall mean (SD) baseline CD4 cell count 428 (209) and 414 (229) cells/μl, Arms1 and 2, respectively. At week 48, plasma HIV RNA was less than 50 copies/ml in 55 of 56 of those completing study procedures. Cognitive function improved over 48 weeks [mean change z-score (SD) 0.16 (0.09) Arm1 and 0.25 (0.08) Arm2, P = 0.96 for differences between study arms]. A greater increase in frontal grey matter N-acetyl aspartate/creatine ratio was observed in Arm1 [ratio change of 0.071 (SD 0.16)] versus Arm2 [change -0.097 (SD 0.18), P = 0.009], although this was not associated with changes in cognitive function (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Maraviroc-intensified ART had no demonstrable benefit on cognitive function in individuals initiating ART. Greater improvement in neuronal metabolites (N-acetyl aspartate/creatine) was observed with standard ART. Future work should focus on maraviroc-intensified ART in individuals with cognitive impairment.

HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

The modern antiretroviral treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection has considerably lowered the incidence of opportunistic infections. With the exception of the most severe dementia manifestations, the incidence and prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) have not decreased, and HAND continues to be relevant in daily clinical practice. Now, HAND occurs in earlier stages of HIV infection, and the clinical course differs from that before the widespread use of combination antiretroviral treatment (cART). The predominant clinical feature is a subcortical dementia with deficits in the domains concentration, attention, and memory. Motor signs such as gait disturbance and impaired manual dexterity have become less prominent. Prior to the advent of cART, the cerebral dysfunction could at least partially be explained by the viral load and by virus-associated histopathological findings. In subjects where cART has led to undetectable or at least very low viral load, the pathogenic virus-brain interaction is less direct, and an array of poorly understood immunological and probably toxic phenomena are discussed. This paper gives an overview of the current concepts in the field of HAND and provides suggestions for the diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Measuring and managing cognitive impairment in HIV

: Cognitive impairment remains a frequently reported complaint in HIV-positive patients despite virologically suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Rates of cognitive impairment in antiretroviral treated HIV-positive cohorts vary and strongly depend on definitions utilized.The underlying pathogenesis is likely to be multifactorial and includes immune activation, neuroinflammation, antiretroviral neurotoxicity, the presence of noninfectious comorbidities such as vascular disease and depression and patient lifestyle factors such as recreational drug use.Contributing factors to cognitive impairment may change over time with ageing HIV-positive populations. Cerebrovascular disease and neurodegenerative causes of cognitive impairment may become more common with advancing age; how these factors interact with HIV-associated cognitive impairment is not yet known.Cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA escape may occur in up to 10% of patients undergoing lumbar puncture clinically and can be associated with compartmentalized and resistant virus.Changes in antiretroviral therapy in patients with cognitive impairment should be based on current and historic resistance profiles of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma virus, or on potential antiretroviral drug neurotoxicity. Whether and how antiretroviral therapy should be changed in the absence of these factors is not known and requires study in adequately powered randomized trials in carefully selected clinical cohorts.

Treating HIV Infection in the Central Nervous System

Combination antiretroviral treatment is associated with clear benefits in HIV-positive subjects, and is also effective in the central nervous system (CNS), meaning HIV-associated dementia is now an uncommon event. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients show symptoms of neurocognitive impairment which may negatively affect their quality of life. Although several risk factors for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders have been identified, there is no clear recommendation for their prevention and management. In this review, the penetration of drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid/CNS is discussed as well as the viral and clinical consequences associated with higher/lower compartmental exposure. We also review the potential interventions according to the currently identified underlying mechanisms, including persistent CNS immune activation, legacy effects, low-level viral replication and escape, co-morbidities, and antiretroviral-associated direct and indirect 'neurotoxicity'. Adjunctive therapies and interventions (including neuro-rehabilitation) are then briefly discussed. The treatment of HIV infection in the CNS is a complex area of therapeutics requiring multidisciplinary interventions and further study.