HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in the Time of COVID-19: How a Robust and Responsive HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Intervention Can Avert Loss of HIV Prevention Coverage During a Global Pandemic

Understanding HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Questions of U.S. Health Care Providers: Unique Perspectives from the PrEPline Clinical Teleconsultation Service

Introduction: Fewer than a quarter of people considered to have factors associated with HIV acquisition are prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States. Prior studies demonstrate disparities in provider comfort and knowledge regarding PrEP, suggesting a need for provider capacity building to support widespread PrEP availability. This study examined real-world PrEP clinical questions/cases from providers to a teleconsultation service to identify knowledge gaps and improve PrEP-related training materials and clinical guidelines. Methods: The National Clinician Consultation Center (NCCC) PrEPline provides educational teleconsultation services on clinical decision-making related to PrEP for U.S. health care providers. The NCCC PrEP consultation data collected between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed and systematically categorized by clinical topics, subtopics, and complexity levels (low, moderate, and high). Results: Within the study period, the PrEPline provided 1,754 teleconsultations. More than three quarters came from advanced practice nurses and physicians. The topics of questions commonly focused on medication-based HIV prevention strategies (22.7%), PrEP laboratory ordering/monitoring (17.4%), and side effects and contraindications (14.6%). The majority of teleconsultations (57.9%) involved sharing information that was directly available/addressed in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2017 PrEP Guidelines (i.e., low complexity). Discussion: The low frequency of consultations from nonphysician and non-nurse practitioner providers may suggest a need for increased training and collaborative opportunities for other types of providers. The high percentage of low-complexity inquiries may reveal a desire for capacity-building materials specifically designed for practicing providers (e.g., abridged versions of guidelines). This study may inform future research, best clinical practices, and aid in the development of training materials to increase providers' HIV prevention comfort and knowledge.

Characterizing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on HIV PrEP care: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature

The global COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown measures have caused disruptions to sexual health services and created additional barriers to the continuity of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among key populations. This review provides an examination of the influences of the pandemic on engagement in the PrEP care continuum. Using the PRISMA guideline, 46 studies were included in this review and the synthesis. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income settings through quantitative analysis. A majority of studies examining the changes in PrEP use suggested a decline or discontinuation in PrEP uptake during the pandemic. The most common reasons for stopping using PrEP were perceived barriers to PrEP-related care, having reduced sexual behaviors and fewer sexual partners, and reduced perceived risk of HIV infection. Limited studies documenting an increase in PrEP uptake were all in specific PrEP optimizing programs. During the pandemic, there is also an emerging trend of switching to on-demand PrEP from daily oral PrEP. Future studies should understand the mechanism of strategies that facilitated the improvements during the pandemic. PrEP implementation programs should consider alternative PrEP modalities and provide consistent and comprehensive knowledge about correct information.

The effect of an HIV preexposure prophylaxis panel management strategy to increase preexposure prophylaxis prescriptions

OBJECTIVE

The HIV preexposure prophylaxis optimization intervention (PrEP-OI) study evaluated the efficacy of a panel management intervention using PrEP coordinators and a web-based panel management tool to support healthcare providers in optimizing PrEP prescription and ongoing PrEP care.

DESIGN

The PrEP-OI study was a stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial conducted across 10 San Francisco Department of Public Health primary care sites between November 2018 and September 2019. Each month, clinics one-by-one initiated PrEP-OI in random order until all sites received the intervention by the study team.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the number of PrEP prescriptions per month. Secondary outcomes compared pre- and postintervention periods on whether PrEP was discussed and whether PrEP-related counseling (e.g., HIV risk assessment, risk reduction counseling, PrEP initiation/continuation assessment) was conducted. Prescription and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic health records. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) and risk ratios (RR) to estimate the intervention effect on primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of PrEP prescriptions across clinics increased from 1.85/month (standard deviation [SD] = 2.55) preintervention to 2.44/month (SD = 3.44) postintervention (IRR = 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.73; P  = 0.021). PrEP-related discussions during clinic visits (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.04-1.22; P  = 0.004), HIV risk assessment (RR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.14-1.72; P  = 0.001), and risk reduction counseling (RR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.03-1.30; P  = 0.011) increased from the pre- to the postintervention period. Assessment of PrEP initiation/continuation increased over time during the postintervention period (RR = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.99-1.11; P  = 0.100).

CONCLUSIONS

A panel management intervention using PrEP coordinators and a web-based panel management tool increased PrEP prescribing and improved PrEP-related counseling in safety-net primary care clinics.