Dynamics of Pre-Exposure (PrEP) Eligibility Because of Waxing and Waning of HIV Risk in Rakai, Uganda

Disparities in PrEP use and unmet need across PEPFAR-supported programs: doubling down on prevention to put people first and end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030

Background

In 2023, an estimated 1.3 million people newly acquired HIV. In the same year, 3.5 million individuals received pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), falling short of the UNAIDS target of 21.2 million by 2025. With over 90% of global PrEP programming supported by PEPFAR, a better understanding of disparities in PrEP provision is needed to inform PEPFAR's approach to reach and deliver prevention services and achieve UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals in all populations by 2025. The objective of this paper is to assess unmet PrEP need in PEPFAR-supported countries.

Methods

We analyzed FY2023 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER) results from 48 PEPFAR-supported countries to calculate PrEP-to-need ratios (PnR) by geography and population. PnR offers an ecological measure to identify disparities and missed opportunities for PrEP programming. PnR was calculated as the ratio of PrEP users to the number of positive HIV tests. PrEP users are defined through new initiations (PrEP_NEW) and re-initiations or continuation (PrEP_CT). HTS_TST_POS measures the number of positive HIV tests and was used as a proxy for new diagnoses. PnR was also calculated using Naomi-estimated 2023 HIV incidence, where available. A higher PnR indicates more PrEP users relative to PrEP need in a population.

Results

In FY23, 1,760,888 people initiated PrEP, and 1,736,144 people tested positive for HIV. PnR ranged from 0.12 (India) to 6.46 (Brazil), and 19 (40%) countries had fewer PrEP users than positive HIV tests (PnR <1.0). By population, people 15-24 years old, people who inject drugs, and transgender populations had the highest median PnR. When examining estimated HIV incidence, Mozambique and South Africa reported lower than average PnR and higher than average HIV incidence.

Conclusion

PrEP use relative to population need varied greatly by country and subpopulation across PEPFAR programs, suggesting a need for greater advocacy, inclusivity, accessibility, and integrated prevention programming. PnR may be a useful indicator of population PrEP coverage and unmet need, and can inform effective, data-driven, and person-centered PEPFAR prevention programming and policies. Tailoring PrEP scale-up strategies by age, sex, key population, and geography is crucial to achieving UNAIDS targets and ending the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat for all by 2030.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) knowledge, use, and discontinuation among Lake Victoria fisherfolk in Uganda: a cross-sectional population-based study

Background

There are limited population-level data on the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care continuum in eastern Africa. Here, we assessed the PrEP care continuum following PrEP rollout in a Ugandan community with ~40% HIV seroprevalence.

Methods

We used cross-sectional population-based data collected between September 3 and December 19, 2018 from a Lake Victoria fishing community in southern Uganda to measure levels of self-reported PrEP knowledge, ever use, and discontinuation following 2017 PrEP rollout via a U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-supported phased implementation program. Our analysis included HIV-seronegative persons reporting having ever received an HIV test result. We examined associations between demographic, behavioral, and health utilization factors with each outcome using age-adjusted modified Poisson regression.

Results

There were 1,401 HIV-seronegative participants, of whom 1,363 (97.3%) reported ever receiving an HIV test result. Median age was 29 years (IQR: 23-36), and 42.3% (n=577) were women. Most (85.5%; n=1,166) participants reported PrEP knowledge, but few (14.5%; n=197) reported ever using PrEP. Among 375 (47.7%) men and 169 (29.3%) women PrEP-eligible at time of survey, 18.9% (n=71) and 27.8% (n=47) reported ever using PrEP, respectively. Over half (52.3%, n=103) of those who had ever used PrEP, self-reported current use.

Conclusion

In this Lake Victoria fishing community, there were low levels of PrEP use despite high levels of PrEP awareness and eligibility, particularly among men. Efforts that enhance awareness of HIV risk and increase PrEP accessibility may help increase PrEP use among HIV-seronegative persons in African settings with high HIV burden.