Random Biopsy During High-Resolution Anoscopy Increases Diagnosis of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

A Prospective, Dual-Center Trial of Circumferential Radiofrequency Ablation of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Demonstrate Improved Long-term Efficacy Over Historical Controls of Targeted Ablation

BACKGROUND

Targeted ablation of anal canal high-grade dysplasia results in high recurrence over time. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation might decrease recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of circumferential radiofrequency ablation for anal high-grade dysplasia.

DESIGN

This was a dual-center, prospective trial of circumferential radiofrequency ablation with a 1-year follow-up with longer follow-up data abstracted from medical records of study patients returning after trial for surveillance. Ten participants from the identically conducted pilot circumferential radiofrequency ablation trial were included to improve sample size for longer-term analysis.

SETTINGS

This study included 3 surgeons at 2 sites.

PATIENTS

The study included 51 patients undergoing circumferential radiofrequency ablation for anal canal high-grade dysplasia.

INTERVENTION

Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of anal canal high-grade dysplasia and targeted radiofrequency ablation of recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were circumferential radiofrequency ablation efficacy and associated morbidity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one participants underwent circumferential radiofrequency ablation but 48 participants returned for 1 or more postprocedure high-resolution anoscopy and were evaluable. The mean age of participants was 43 years, most were male (94%), 33% were living with HIV, and 58% had 3 or more high-grade dysplasias treated. Sixty percent had no recurrence, whereas 19% had 1 recurrence, 15% had 2 recurrences, and 6% had 3 recurrences. Most recurrences (66%) developed within the first 6 months. Kaplan-Meier probability of recurrence combining both series was 19% at 3 months, 30% at 6 months, and approximately 40% after 6 months out to 30 months. Most common morbidities were pain (85.4%) lasting for a median of 21 (range, 4-91) days and bleeding (91%) lasting for a median of 21 (range, 5-87) days. Of those with pain and bleeding, 65% and 85%, respectively, described it as mild. No patients developed fistulas, stricture, or incontinence. No serious adverse events related to circumferential radiofrequency ablation occurred. Having a previous recurrence was the only significant predictor of a subsequent recurrence (HR, 28.53) for recurrence at 9 months or before.

LIMITATIONS

Enrollment ended prematurely, 10 participants from the pilot study were combined to increase the sample size, and longer-term follow-up was collected retrospectively were the limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumferential radiofrequency ablation has improved efficacy over targeted ablation but with increased pain and bleeding. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B973 .

ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO BICNTRICO SOBRE LA ABLACIN POR RADIOFRECUENCIA CIRCUNFERENCIAL DE LESIONES ANALES INTRAEPITELIALES ESCAMOSAS DE ALTO GRADO DEMOSTRANDO MAYOR EFICACIA A LARGO PLAZO CON RELACIN A CONTROLES HISTRICOS DE ABLACIN DIRIGIDA

ANTECEDENTES:La ablación dirigida de la displasia de alto grado en el canal anal proporciona como resultados una alta recidiva a largo plazo. La ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial podría disminuir la reincidencia.OBJETIVO:Determinar la seguridad y eficacia de la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial para la displasia anal de alto grado.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo bicéntrico de ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial con un seguimiento de 1 año, en base al monitoreo prolongado de datos, obtenidos de los registros medicos, de todos los pacientes incluidos en el estudio y que fueron controlados clinicamente. Diez participantes del estudio piloto de ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial realizada de manera idéntica, se combinaron para mejorar el análisis del tamaño de la muestra a largo plazo.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 51 pacientes sometidos a la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial de una lesion displásica de alto grado en el canal anal.AJUSTES:Tres cirujanos en 2 centros.INTERVENCIÓN:Ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial de la displasia de alto grado en el canal anal y ablación por radiofrecuencia dirigida de la recidiva.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Las medidas primarias fueron la eficacia de la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial y la morbilidad asociada.RESULTADOS:Cincuenta y un participantes se sometieron a la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial, de los cuales, 48 regresaron para ser evaluados con ≥1 anuscopias de alta resolución, después del procedimiento. La edad media de los participantes fue de 43 años, en su mayoría hombres (94%), el 33% eran portadores de VIH y el 58% tenía ≥3 lesiones displásicas de alto grado tratadas. El sesenta por ciento no tuvo recidiva, mientras que el 19%, 15% y 6% tuvieron 1, 2 o 3 recidivas. La mayoría de las recaídas (66%) se desarrollaron dentro de los primeros 6 meses. La probabilidad de recurrencia de Kaplan-Meier combinando ambas series fue del 19 % a los 3 meses, del 30 % a los 6 meses y aproximadamente del 40 % entre los 6 y 30 meses. Los indicadores de morbilidad más frecuentes fueron, el dolor (85,4%) con una mediana de duración de 21 días (rango, 4-91) y sangrado (91%) con una mediana de duración de 21días (rango, 5-87). Aquellos pacientes con dolor (65%) y sangrado (85%) respectivamente, los describieron como leves. Ningún paciente desarrolló fístula, estenosis o incontinencia. No se produjeron eventos adversos graves relacionados con la ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial. Tener una recurrencia previa fue el único factor predictivo importante de una recidiva ulterior (RH 28,53) en casos de recaída a los 9 meses o antes.LIMITACIONES:Como el registro finalizó prematuramente, se agregaron 10 participantes del estudio piloto para aumentar el tamaño de la muestra. El seguimiento a largo plazo fué recopilado retrospectivamente.CONCLUSIONES:La ablación por radiofrecuencia circunferencial ha mejorado la eficacia sobre la ablación dirigida pero con dolor y sangrado mas importantes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B973 . ( Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Prevalence of Anal High-Risk Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Abnormal Anal Cytology among Women Living with HIV

Background: Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), WLWHs, are at high risk of developing anal cancer associated with high-risk human papilloma virus infection (HR-HPV). We analyzed the prevalence of anal HR-HPV infection and abnormal anal cytology in a cohort of WLWHs and assessed the risk factors for anal HR-HPV infection. Methods: We present a single-center, observational cross-sectional study. WLWHs who underwent anal cytology and anal human papilloma virus (HPV) testing were selected. High-resolution anoscopy was performed in cases of abnormal anal cytology. All suspicious lesions were biopsied. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze risk factors for abnormal anal screening. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, 400 WLWHs were studied. Of them, 334 met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. Abnormal anal cytology was detected in 39.5% of patients, and anal HR-HPV in 40.1%, with HPV 16 in 33 (26.6%) of them. Concomitant HR-HPV cervical infection was the only independent risk factor for HR-HPV anal infection (OR 1.67 95% CI, p < 0.001). Conclusions: WLWHs have a high prevalence of HR-HPV anal infection and anal cytologic abnormalities. HR-HPV cervical infection is the main predictor of HR-HPV anal infection.

High-risk human papillomavirus test in anal smears: can it optimize the screening for anal cancer?

OBJECTIVE

The current method for screening anal cancer is anal cytology, which has low sensitivity. Since high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is associated with almost 90% of cases of anal cancer, the objective of this study is to evaluate whether testing for HR-HPV can optimize the screening.

DESIGN

Prospective study with patients enrolled in a screening program for anal dysplasia. Considering high-resolution anoscopy (HRA)-guided biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, the diagnostic performance of anal cytology, HR-HPV testing, and the combination of both was calculated.

SETTINGS

A single center for anal dysplasia.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 364 patients (72% males, 82% HIV-positive).

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent anal cytology, HR-HPV test, and HRA-guided biopsy of the anal canal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ability of cytology and HR-HPV test (individually and combined) to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and analysis of the cost of each diagnostic algorithm.

RESULTS

Cytology alone was the cheapest approach, but had the lowest sensitivity [59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 46-71%], despite of highest specificity (73%, 95% CI 68-78%). Cotesting had the highest sensitivity (85%, 95% CI 74-93%) and lowest specificity (43%, 95% CI 38-49%), and did not seem to be cost-effective. However, HR-HPV testing can be used to triage patients with normal and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology for HRA, resulting in an algorithm with high sensitivity (80%, 95% CI 68-89%), and specificity (71%, 95% CI 65-76%), allied to a good cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

HR-HPV testing is helpful to optimize the screening in cases of normal and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology.

High-resolution anoscopy, is there a benefit in proceeding directly to the operating room?

BACKGROUND

The development of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) has advanced our ability to detect anal dysplasia. Historically, HRA is performed in a clinical setting and subsequent ablation is performed in the clinical setting or operating room. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective venue for the performance of HRA.

METHODS

Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, the correlation between anal cytology and HRA performed in the clinic versus in the operating room was evaluated. Data were extracted from our IRB-approved prospective HRA database over the time period of 2013-2017.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight HRAs were compared (101 in the clinical setting, 27 in the operating room). There was a statistically significant difference in the correlation between anal cytology and HRA pathology for procedures performed in the clinical setting (55% [56/101]) versus those performed in the operating room (82% [22/27]) (p = 0.014). More biopsies were obtained in the operating room than in the clinic setting (3 vs. 1, p < 0.0001). The majority of patients who had HRA in a clinical setting with subsequent HRA in the operating room stated that they preferred to have their HRAs performed in the operating room due to discomfort from the HRA procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection rates for anal dysplasia on HRA, are significantly higher when performed in the operating room. To prevent discomfort in the clinical setting, patients with high-grade dysplasia on anal pap testing may benefit from proceeding directly to the operating room for concurrent HRA and ablation.

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Anal High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Women Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND

Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (WLHIV) have disproportionately high rates of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus compared with the general population of women. Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) precede anal cancer, and accurate studies of HSIL prevalence among WLHIV in the United States are lacking.

METHODS

The AIDS Malignancy Consortium 084 study was a multicenter national trial to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for anal HSIL in a US cohort. Eligible participants were WLHIV aged ≥18 years with no history of anal HSIL. Study participants had an examination including collection of cervical/vaginal and anal specimens, followed by high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy.

RESULTS

We enrolled 256 women with evaluable anal pathology. The mean age was 49.4 years, 64% women were non-Hispanic black, 67% were former or current smokers, and 56% reported ever having anal sex with a man. The median CD4 T-cell count was 664 cells/μL. The prevalence of anal histologic HSIL (hHSIL) was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22%-33%). There was a strong concordance (240/254) between local and consensus pathologists for hHSIL vs less than hHSIL (κ = 0.86 [95% CI, .79-.93]). Current CD4 count of ≤200 cells/μL was the strongest predictor of consensus anal hHSIL diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 10.34 [95% CI, 3.47-30.87]). History of anoreceptive intercourse was also associated with hHSIL (aOR, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.22-4.76]).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of anal hHSIL in WLHIV in the United States was 27% in this study where all participants received high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy.

Prevalence and Association of Perianal and Intra-Anal Warts with Composite High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Among Gay and Bisexual Men: Baseline Data from the Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes anal warts and anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A higher incidence of anal cancer has been found among individuals previously diagnosed with anogenital warts. We aimed to investigate the association between anal warts and the presumed anal SCC precursor high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), among participants in the Study of the Prevention of Anal Cancer (SPANC). SPANC was a longitudinal study of anal HPV infections and related lesions among gay and bisexual men (GBM) age 35 years and older, in Sydney, Australia. Anal cytology and high-resolution anoscopy were performed. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between clinically diagnosed anal warts and intra-anal composite-HSIL (cytology and/or histology) at the baseline visit. The prevalence of HSIL within biopsies from intra-anal warts was calculated. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and HPV-genotyping was performed on HSIL lesions. Among 616 participants at study entry, 165 (26.8%) and 51 (8.3%) had intra-anal and perianal warts, respectively. Warts were associated with composite-HSIL, even after adjustment for HIV status, age, lifetime receptive anal intercourse partner number, and smoking (perianal: aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.17-3.87, p = 0.013; intra-anal: aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16-2.46, p = 0.006). HSIL was detected in 24 (14.5%) of 165 biopsies from intra-anal warts. Of 17 HSIL lesions, 16 (94.1%) had high-risk HPV detected by LCM. Anal warts were common. Prevalent anal warts were associated with composite-HSIL. HSIL may be detected within biopsies of intra-anal warts. Anal warts may be a useful addition to risk stratification for HSIL among GBM.

The importance of anal cancer screening and high-resolution anoscopy to gastroenterology practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) is rare, its incidence has been rising and in high-risk populations exceeds the incidence of cancers for which screening programs are implemented. Therefore, targeted screening techniques are being evaluated with high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) as the current gold standard because of its ability to detect anal intraepithelial dysplasia (AIN) and premalignant high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). However, a scarcity of trained providers presents a barrier to screening.

RECENT FINDINGS

ASCC incidence is rising especially in elderly women and young black men. Premalignant HSIL may not only progress to ASCC but also regress. Biomarkers such as HPV type, p16 immunostaining and DNA methylation markers may emerge as predictors of disease progression.HRA with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine staining can be used to detect HSIL and ASCC. Recent studies suggest that anal cancer screening may have an impact on the stage of ASCC at diagnosis and the incidence of anal cancer.The Anal Cancer HSIL Outcomes Research (ANCHOR) study is underway to determine whether treating HSIL effects ASCC incidence.

SUMMARY

Although there are no consensus screening guidelines for anal cancer, it is reasonable to screen high-risk populations with physical examination, anal cytology and HRA. Gastroenterologists can support anal cancer screening programmes through identifying patients at risk, performing noninvasive screening and considering to incorporate endoscopic techniques to examine the anal canal. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COG/A32.

Association of antiretroviral therapy with anal high-risk human papillomavirus, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and anal cancer in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on the natural history of anal high-risk HPV and anal lesion progression is not well established. We reviewed the association of ART and other HIV-related factors on anal HPV infection, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), and anal cancer among people living with HIV.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies published between Jan 1, 1996, and Oct 30, 2019, that reported the association of HIV-related exposures (ART or highly active ART [HAART], HIV-RNA plasma viral load [PVL], and nadir or current CD4 cell count) with outcomes of anal high-risk HPV prevalence, incidence, and persistence; prevalence, incidence, progression, or regression of anal histological and cytological abnormalities; and anal cancer incidence. Effect estimates were extracted whenever available; otherwise, they were calculated from raw data. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and random-effects meta-analyses were done to examine heterogeneity using the I² statistic. This study is registered on the PROSPERO database, CRD42018007271.

FINDINGS

We identified 6777 studies, of which 5377 were excluded before full-text review. 122 studies providing estimates for 130 distinct populations matched the inclusion criteria. The populations comprised 417 006 people living with HIV (women, men who have sex with men, and men who have sex with women). 41 (32%) population estimates were not stratified by sex or sexual orientation. People living with HIV receiving ART had 35% lower high-risk HPV prevalence than ART-naive people (crude odds ratio [OR] 0·65, 95% CI 0·54-0·79; I² 12·1%, p=0·31) in 18 studies, and prolonged ART use was associated with a 10% reduction per year in high-risk HPV prevalence in two studies (adjusted OR 0·90, 0·85-0·95; I² 0%, p=0·88). People living with HIV with undetectable PVL had lower HSIL-AIN2+ prevalence than those with detectable PVL (crude OR 0·84, 0·72-0·98; I² 0%, p=0·80) in 16 studies, particularly if sustained for more than 1 year (crude OR 0·62, 0·47-0·81; I² 0%, p=0·51). ART was not associated with anal cancer incidence when adjusted for years living with HIV in three studies (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·11, 95% CI 0·68-1·80; I² 0%, p=0·57), but ART users with sustained undetectable HIV PVL had 44% lower risk of anal cancer than those without (adjusted HR 0·56, 0·44-0·70; I² 0%, p=0·94) and for each increase in nadir CD4 cell counts of 100 cells per μL, there was a 40% decrease in anal cancer incidence (crude HR 0·60, 0·46-0·78; I² 21·7%, p=0·26).

INTERPRETATION

Effective ART use and early initiation at high nadir CD4 counts might reduce anal high-risk HPV infection and anal cancer risk. Although most studies were cross-sectional in design and few adjusted for potential confounders, this analysis provides comprehensive estimates of the effect of ART and HIV-related factors on the natural history of anal HPV-related disease in people living with HIV.

FUNDING

EU Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme.

What Is the Risk of Anal Carcinoma in Patients With Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia III?

BACKGROUND

The risk of anal carcinoma after previous diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of anal carcinoma in patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III and to identify predictors for subsequent malignancy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (1973-2014).

SETTING

The study was composed of population-based cancer registries from the United States.

PATIENTS

Patients who were diagnosed with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was rate of subsequent anal squamous cell carcinoma. Predictors for anal cancer were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 2074 patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were identified and followed for a median time of 4.0 years (interquartile range, 1.8-6.7 y). Of the cohort, 171 patients (8.2%) subsequently developed anal cancer. Median time from anal intraepithelial neoplasia III diagnosis to anal cancer diagnosis was 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.1-4.5 y). Fifty-two patients (30.4%) who developed anal carcinoma were staged T2 or higher. Ablative therapies for initial anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were associated with a reduction in the risk of anal cancer (OR = 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.7); p = 0.004). Time-to-event analysis revealed that the 5-year incidence of anal carcinoma after anal intraepithelial neoplasia III was 9.5% or ≈1.9% per year.

LIMITATIONS

The registry did not record HIV status, surveillance schedule, use of high-resolution anoscopy, or provider specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest published cohort of patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III, ≈10% of patients were projected to develop anal cancer within 5 years. Nearly one third of anal cancers were diagnosed at stage T2 or higher despite a previous diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. Ablative procedures were associated with a decreased risk of cancer. This study highlights the considerable rate of malignancy in patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III and the need for effective therapies and surveillance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A764.

Biomarker P16 predicts progression risk of anal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether biomarker P16 predicts progression risk for anal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

METHODS

One hundred and nine HIV-infected and 18 HIV-uninfected patients with biopsy-proven anal LSIL at initial screening underwent surveillance high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy within 2 years of diagnosis. P16 immunohistochemistry was performed on index lesions and evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system. The association of predictors and lesional outcomes (progression, persistence or regression) was analysed using ordinal logistic regression models. A subset of p16-positive LSILs was tested for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Upon follow-up, 46 (36%) LSILs progressed to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), 50 (40%) persisted as LSIL and 31 (24%) regressed to benign mucosa (median 16 months, range 5-24 months). Age, sex, race, history of condylomata, CD4 T-cell count and HIV plasma viral load were similar regardless of clinical outcome. P16 immunoreactivity of index lesion was classified as block-positive (n = 36), focal-positive (n = 49) or negative (n = 42). Sixty-four percent of block-positive lesions progressed, as opposed to 35% of focal-positive and 14% of negative lesions (P < 0.001). HR-HPV DNA was detected in 90% of p16 block-positive lesions vs. 55% of focal-positive lesions. In unadjusted analyses, positive p16, HIV and former smoker status were significantly associated with lesional persistence and progression. P16 remained the only significant predictor in an adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker p16 is the strongest predictor for anal LSIL-to-HSIL progression, outperforming other risk factors. To enhance the overall effectiveness of surveillance, we propose using p16 immunohistochemistry to help stratify patients at high vs. low risk of progression.

Anal cytology, histopathology and anoscopy in an anal dysplasia screening program: is anal cytology enough?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The human papilloma virus is the leading cause of anal squamous cell carcinoma. Cytological screening may reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to estimate the agreement between anal cytological examination, histopathology and anoscopic visual impression.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients who underwent anal dysplasia screening between 2011 and 2015, in a proctology clinic of a tertiary referral center.

RESULTS

During the study period, 141 patients (91% men, 87% with HIV infection) underwent 175 anal cytology tests. Of these, 33% were negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy (NILM), 22% were atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS), 33% were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 12% were high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). With regard to anoscopic visual impression, 46% of patients had no lesions and excision/biopsy of the identified lesions was performed in the remaining patients. The weighted kappa-agreement between abnormal cytological results and anoscopic visual impression was moderate (k = 0.48). The weighted kappa-agreement between simultaneous anal cytological examinations and anal histopathologic findings was low (kappa = 0.20). With regard to the histological examination of cases with HSIL or superficially invasive squamous cell carcinoma, 64% of patients had dysplasia of a lower grade according to the cytological analysis (6 ASCUS, 18 LSIL and 4 NILM).

CONCLUSION

There was a poor correlation between anal cytology, histopathology and anoscopic visual impression and a high number of histological studies of HGD that were of a lower dysplastic degree according to the cytological examination. Therefore, anal cytology screening should not be used as the sole method of anal dysplasia screening.

Brief Report: Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy for Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Results From a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study in HIV+ Participants

BACKGROUND

HIV-positive individuals have high incidence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ), which can progress to cancer. Focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treats HSIL, but metachronous recurrence remains high and may be improved with circumferential treatment.

SETTING

The study was performed at a single center.

METHODS

This was a prospective trial of circumferential anal RFA using Barrx 60 RFA focal catheters in participants with ≥1 anal SCJ HSIL. The entire SCJ was ablated by RFA. Adverse events (AEs), symptoms, including pain, and quality of life were assessed. High-resolution anoscopy assessed recurrences at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Lesion site biopsies occurred at month 12. Recurrences were retreated with focal RFA.

RESULTS

Ten male participants (9 HIV+), with a median 2 HSILs (range 2-8) each, enrolled. Median T-cell count and viral load were 730 cells/mcL and 38 copies/mL. Median duration of RFA treatment was 6.5 (5-13) minutes. Lesion persistence occurred in 4 participants (3 at 3 months, 1 at 6 months). Recurrence at a new site occurred in 1 participant at 3 months. No lesion persisted after retreatment. All participants were HSIL free and completely healed by 12 months. Two device-related mild AEs occurred in 1 participant each (thrombosed external hemorrhoid and soft anal scar; both resolved). No serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

Circumferential anal SCJ RFA produced total HSIL eradication with no more than 2 treatments. Circumferential RFA seems to be well tolerated with minimal pain and no serious AEs in HIV+ participants. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT02189161.

A trial of radiofrequency ablation for anal intraepithelial neoplasia

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) effectively treats esophageal high-grade dysplasia, but its efficacy in treating anal canal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) is unsubstantiated. This prospective study assessed the safety and efficacy of applying hemi-circumferential RFA to anal canal HSIL.

METHODS

Twenty-one HIV-negative participants with HSIL occupying ≤ half the anal canal circumference were treated with hemi-circumferential anal canal RFA. Participants were assessed every 3 months for 12 months with high-resolution anoscopy; recurrence in the treatment zone was re-treated with focal RFA.

RESULTS

Twenty-one participants with a mean of 1.7 lesions (range 1-4) enrolled and completed the trial. Six (29 %) participants had recurrent HSIL within the treated hemi-circumference within 1 year. Four participants (19 %) had persistence of an index lesion at 3 months. One (2.9 %) index HSIL persisted again at 12 months. No participants had more than two RFA treatments. KM curve-predicted HSIL-free survival within the treatment zone at 1 year was 76 % (95 % CI 52-89 %). Comparing the first 7 and last 14 participants, the predicted 1-year HSIL-free survivals are 43 % (95 % CI 10-73 %) and 93 % (95 % CI 59-99 %), respectively (p = 0.008), suggesting a learning curve with the treating physician. Multivariable analysis showed decreased recurrence in the last 14 participants (HR 0.02; 95 % CI 0.001-0.63) while increasing BMI increased recurrence (HR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.01-2.01). No participants had device or procedure-related serious adverse events, anal stricture, or heavy bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemi-circumferential RFA yielded a high rate of anal HSIL eradication in HIV-negative patients at 1 year with minimal adverse events. Lesion persistence was probably related to incomplete initial ablation.

An update on anal neoplasia

Although anal cancer remains a relatively uncommon tumour its frequency is rising, especially in high-risk groups. It is now well recognized that anal squamous cell carcinoma, the largely predominant tumour type, shares many similarities with cancer of the uterine cervix, with a major role for oncogenic human papilloma viruses in both tumours. Anal squamous precancerous lesions have now to be classified with the same criteria and terminology as their cervical counterparts, by using the Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology (LAST) proposal. Only p16 protein is a useful marker in this setting at the present time. As most cases of anal cancer are treated by non-surgical procedures, pathology has a limited role in the staging of the disease, except for early lesions treated by local excision, and when the sentinel lymph node procedure is undertaken that is still under evaluation. A variety of other tumour types can occur more rarely, with difficult diagnostic issues, solved in most cases by immunohistochemistry.

Screening for Anal Cancer in Women

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of anal cancer is higher in women than men in the general population and has been increasing for several decades. Similar to cervical cancer, most anal cancers are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV), and it is believed that anal cancers are preceded by anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Our goals were to summarize the literature on anal cancer, HSIL, and HPV infection in women and to provide screening recommendations in women.

METHODS

A group of experts convened by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the International Anal Neoplasia Society reviewed the literature on anal HPV infection, anal SIL, and anal cancer in women.

RESULTS

Anal HPV infection is common in women but is relatively transient in most. The risk of anal HSIL and cancer varies considerably by risk group, with human immunodeficiency virus-infected women and those with a history of lower genital tract neoplasia at highest risk compared with the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

While there are no data yet to demonstrate that identification and treatment of anal HSIL leads to reduced risk of anal cancer, women in groups at the highest risk should be queried for anal cancer symptoms and required to have digital anorectal examinations to detect anal cancers. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected women and women with lower genital tract neoplasia may be considered for screening with anal cytology with triage to treatment if HSIL is diagnosed. Healthy women with no known risk factors or anal cancer symptoms do not need to be routinely screened for anal cancer or anal HSIL.

High-resolution anoscopy or expectant management for anal intraepithelial neoplasia for the prevention of anal cancer: is there really a difference?

BACKGROUND

High-resolution anoscopy has been shown to improve identification of anal intraepithelial neoplasia but a reduction in progression to anal squamous-cell cancer has not been substantiated when serial high-resolution anoscopy is compared with traditional expectant management.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution anoscopy versus expectant management for the surveillance of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and the prevention of anal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of all patients who presented with anal squamous dysplasia, positive anal Pap smears, or anal squamous-cell cancer from 2007 to 2013.

SETTING

This study was performed in the colorectal department of a university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Included patients had biopsy-proven anal intraepithelial neoplasia from 2007 to 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated with high-resolution anoscopy with ablation or standard anoscopy with ablation. Both groups were treated with imiquimod and followed every 6 months indefinitely.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of anal squamous-cell cancer in each group was the primary end point.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2013, 424 patients with anal squamous dysplasia were seen in the clinic (high-resolution anoscopy, 220; expectant management, 204). Three patients (high-resolution anoscopy, 1; expectant management, 2) progressed to anal squamous-cell cancer; 2 were noncompliant with follow-up and with HIV treatment, and the third was allergic to imiquimod and refused to take topical 5-fluorouracil. The 5-year progression rate was 6.0% (95% CI, 1.5-24.6) for expectant management and 4.5% (95% CI, 0.7-30.8) for high-resolution anoscopy (p = 0.37).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective review. There is potential for selection and referral bias. Because of the rarity of the outcome, the study may be underpowered.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with squamous-cell dysplasia followed with expectant management or high-resolution anoscopy rarely develop squamous-cell cancer if they are compliant with the protocol. The cost, morbidity, and value of high-resolution anoscopy should be further evaluated in lieu of these findings.

A comparative study between conventional and liquid-based cytology in screening for anal intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive patients

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is associated with HPV infection and can be detected by cytological screening. While conventional exfoliative cytology (CC) is a low-cost and nonaggressive method, liquid-based cytology (LBC) tends to give clearer readings. Although studies of the efficacy of anal cancer screening methods would be of great importance for groups at high risk for AIN, few such studies have been conducted. The aim of the present study was to assess the concordance of CC and LBC in diagnosing anal pre-neoplastic lesions, and to compare cytological results with anoscopy, histopathological, and molecular biology findings. Comparative study involving 33 HIV-positive patients, who underwent anoscopy and biopsy of suspected lesions. Concordance between the two cytology methods was calculated, as were the associations between cytology results and findings from other screening methods. A total of 54.5% of cases were considered AIN-negative by CC and LBC, and concordance between the two methods was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Anoscopy was negative in 15 of the 18 CC- and LBC-negative cases. CC identified 75% of patients with positive biopsy, while LBC identified 85.71% of these patients. Molecular biology results showed that patients with LSIL tested positive for the highest number of HPV subtypes. The associations between positive biopsy and high grade HPV, HPV 16, and multiple HPV infections were not statistically significant. Conventional and liquid-based cytology are equally effective in screening for anal preneoplastic lesions.

Use of human papillomavirus DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry to detect and predict anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men

Background

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk of having anal cancer. Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is the precursor of anal cancer. We explored the use of different biomarkers associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-mediated cell transformation to detect and predict HSIL among HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A total of 123 HIV-positive and 123 HIV-negative MSM were enrolled and followed for 12 months. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) with biopsies were performed at every visit along with anal sample collection for cytology, high-risk HPV DNA genotyping, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry. Performance characteristics and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve were calculated for these biomarkers at baseline, and Cox regression compared the usefulness of these biomarkers in predicting incident HSIL. High-risk HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry each identified 43–46% of MSM whose baseline test positivity would trigger HRA referral. E6/E7 mRNA had the highest sensitivity (64.7%) and correctly classified the highest number of prevalent HSIL cases. With the exception of p16 immunochemistry, most tests showed significant increases in sensitivity but decreases specificity versus anal cytology, while the overall number of correctly classified cases was not significantly different. Baseline or persistent type 16 and/or 18 HPV DNA was the only test significantly predicting incident histologic HSIL within 12 months in models adjusted for HIV status and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions at baseline.

Conclusions/Significance

Countries with a high HIV prevalence among MSM and limited HRA resources may consider using biomarkers to identify individuals at high risk of HSIL. E6/E7 mRNA had the highest sensitivity for prevalent HSIL detection regardless of HIV status, whereas type 16 and/or 18 HPV DNA performed best in predicting development of incident HSIL within 12 months.