A Controlled Study of Double Filtration Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Therapeutic Plasma exchange therapy in Burns

Severe burn injury affects the body in many devastating ways, the most severe being systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This results in a myriad of effects like increasing capillary permeability, thereby fluid loss. It also causes a surge in inflammatory mediators like interleukin (IL)-6, which further increases the capillary leak and fluid loss. This results in refractory hypotension in patients despite adequate fluid resuscitation. Plasma exchange has been used in the management of a number of illnesses with a significant inflammatory component, and, therefore can be considered to have a role in burn injury. In our article, we would like to share our experience of using therapeutic plasma exchange therapy in burn patient.

Changes in Water Properties in Human Tissue after Double Filtration Plasmapheresis-A Case Study

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a blood cleaning technique that enables the removal of unwanted substances from the blood. In our case study, we performed near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy measurements on the human hand tissue before and after a specific DFPP treatment (INUSpheresis with a TKM58 filter), along with NIR measurements of the substances extracted via DFPP (eluate). The spectral data were analyzed using the aquaphotomics approach. The analysis showed that the water properties in the tissue change after DFPP treatment, i.e., an increase in small water clusters, free water molecules and a decrease in hydroxylated water as well as superoxide in hydration shells was noted. The opposite effect was observed in the eluates of both DFPP treatments. Our study is the first that documents changes in water spectral properties after DFPP treatments in human tissue. The changes in tissue water demonstrated by our case study suggest that the positive physiological effects of DFPP in general, and of INUSpheresis with the TKM58 filter in particular, may be associated with improvements in water quality in blood and tissues.

Efficacy and safety of dual filtration plasmapheresis combined with biological agents in active refractory rheumatod arthritis: A retrospective cohort study

To investigate the effectiveness of dual filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a novel blood purification treatment, as a rapid and sustained disease-modifying therapy for active refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA).A retrospective cohort study had been conducted. One hundred fifty three patients aged 18 years or older with active refractory RA were treated with DFPP combined with infliximab (IFX), IFX, or glucocorticoid (GC), all the above treatments were combined with methotrexate (MTX).Baseline characteristic of the 153 patients (DFPP: n = 53; IFX: n = 51; GC: n = 49) were similar across groups. The remission rate of CDAI (SDAI) in the DFPP treatment group was significantly higher than that of the IFX and GC group after 3 months of treatment. The remission rate of DFPP treatment group was above 50%, while in IFX and GC group, the rate of CDAI (SDAI) remission was 41.2% (37.3%) and 22.4% (14.2%) after 3 months of treatment.A combination of DFPP and biological agents can quickly induce remission or low disease activity of active refractory RA.

Plasmapheresis therapy in combination with TNF-α inhibitor and DMARDs: A multitarget method for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a multitarget method involving plasmapheresis therapy combined with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on disease activity parameters in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with active RA were divided into two groups according to the treatment administered: the plasmapheresis combination therapy group (Plasmapheresis combination group; 38 cases), in which patients received plasmapheresis therapy along with a TNF-α inhibitor (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-Fc; rhTNFR:Fc; Etanercept biosimilars) and DMARDs, and a TNF-α inhibitor therapy group (biological agent group; 27 cases), in which patients received a TNF-α inhibitor and DMARDs. Clinical parameters were measured before and at 4 and 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses at week 4 were achieved in 84.2%, 78.9%, and 60.5% of the patients in the plasmapheresis combination group, respectively, and 74.1%, 55.6%, and 29.6% of the patients in the biological agent group, respectively. The ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were superior in the former than the latter group (p < 0.05). Similar patterns of statistical significance were observed for ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses at week 24 after the treatment. ACR50 responses were achieved in 84.2% patients and ACR70 responses were achieved in 76.3% patients in the plasmapheresis combination group, and these proportions were better than those in the biological agent group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The multitarget method combining plasmapheresis, TNF-α inhibitor, and DMARDs for RA therapy was superior to the combination of TNF-α inhibitor for reducing disease activity parameters in patients with active RA.

Therapeutic Apheresis in Hematologic, Autoimmune and Dermatologic Diseases With Immunologic Origin

The process of curing a patient by removing his illness by extracting blood is a very old one. Many years ago, phlebotomy was practiced to cure illness. Now, this old process, placed on a rational basis with therapeutic apheresis (TA), is being followed in clinical practice. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with hollow fiber modules has been used in different severe diseases for more than 40 years. Based on many years of experience with the extracorporeal circulation in end-stage renal disease, the authors herein give an overview of TA in immunological diseases, especially in hematologic, autoimmune and dermatologic diseases. Updated information on immunology and molecular biology of different immunological diseases is discussed in relation to the rationale for apheresis therapy and its place in combination with other modern therapies. With the introduction of novel and effective biologic agents, TA is indicated only in severe cases, such as in rapid progression despite immunosuppressive therapy and/or biologic agents. In mild forms of autoimmune disease, treatment with immunosuppressive therapies and/or biologic agents seems to be sufficient. The prognosis of autoimmune diseases with varying organ manifestations has improved in recent years, due in part to very aggressive therapy schemes. For the immunological diseases that can be treated with TA, the guidelines of the German Working Group of Clinical Nephrology and of the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis are cited. TA has been shown to effectively remove the autoantibodies from blood and lead to rapid clinical improvement.

Therapeutic apheresis in autoimmune diseases

Systemic autoimmune diseases based on an immune pathogenesis produce autoantibodies and circulating immune complexes, which cause inflammation in the tissues of various organs. In most cases, these diseases have a bad prognosis without treatment. Therapeutic apheresis in combination with immunosuppressive therapies has led to a steady increase in survival rates over the last 35 years. Here we provide an overview of the most important pathogenic aspects indicating that therapeutic apheresis can be a supportive therapy in some systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory eye disease. With the introduction of novel and effective biologic agents, therapeutic apheresis is indicated only in severe cases, such as in rapid progression despite immunosuppressive therapy and/or biologic agents, and in patients with renal involvement, acute generalized vasculitis, thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, pulmonary, cardiac, or cerebral involvement. In mild forms of autoimmune disease, treatment with immunosuppressive therapies and/or biologic agents seems to be sufficient. The prognosis of autoimmune diseases with varying organ manifestations has improved considerably in recent years, due in part to very aggressive therapy schemes.

Antisynthetase syndrome with refractory lung involvement and myositis successfully treated with double filtration plasmapheresis

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) is characterized by inflammatory muscle disease, pulmonary and joint involvement, and antisynthetase autoantibodies, with anti-Jo-1 antibody being the most common. Despite the use of immunosuppressive drugs, the prognosis of lung involvement seems poor. Herein, we report a case of refractory ASS, which maintained long-term remission by double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) combined with immunosuppressive therapy. For a 65-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with ASS, immunosuppressive therapy was initiated and plasmapheresis (PP) was performed five times due to acute interstitial pulmonary disease and inflammatory myopathy. She remained in remission for eight months following PP. Increase in interstitial involvement was identified by lung tomography when the patient presented again with complaint of progressive increase in dyspnea and muscle pain. Although the immunosuppressive therapy was increased for the patient with elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (2776 IU/mL), a rapid decrease in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was observed and the patient underwent PP. After four sessions of therapy, insufficient clinical and laboratory response was obtained (control CPK 1797 IU/mL) and because of that issue DFPP using a 2A filter was performed to the patient. There was a marked improvement in complaints of the patient, DLCO, and laboratory findings (control CPK 508 IU/mL) after three sessions of DFPP. The patient, who continued the immunosuppressive therapy after DFPP procedure, is being followed for 12 months in remission. Although our experience is limited with only one patient, DFPP seems promising as a treatment option for ASS with severe lung involvement.

Effects of Double Filtration Plasmapheresis, Leflunomide, and Methotrexate on Inflammatory Changes Found Through Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective.

To evaluate the effects of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in combination with leflunomide and methotrexate (MTX) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected inflammatory changes (synovitis and bone edema) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with high disease activity.

Methods.

Sixty RA patients with highly active disease of 6 months’ to 3 years’ duration were randomized to receive DFPP in combination with leflunomide and MTX (DFPP group), and leflunomide plus MTX (no-DFPP group). The primary endpoint was the improvement in MRI-detected synovitis from baseline over 6 months. Secondary endpoint variables included DAS28 remission and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria responses for 6 consecutive months.

Results.

The study achieved significant improvement in synovitis and bone edema, with significantly lower synovitis and bone edema scores in the DFPP group compared with the no-DFPP group (p < 0.001). Synovitis scores in 48.39% of patients (15/31) in the DFPP group were 0 at Month 6. Bone edema scores in 32.26% of patients (10/31) in the DFPP group were 0 at Month 6. We observed significantly greater ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses and DAS28 remission rates in the DFPP group than in the no-DFPP group (p < 0.001). Sustained DAS28 remission and ACR90 response for at least 6 months were achieved in 100% of patients receiving DFPP therapy.

Conclusion.

The combination of DFPP and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) was superior to DMARD alone for reducing MRI-detected signs of synovitis and bone edema in patients with early highly active RA. DFPP therapy enabled rapid and more complete suppression of inflammation in patients with highly active RA. Nearly half the patients (48.39%) who had received DFPP therapy achieved both clinical remission and imaging remission, a state characterized as true remission.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

Amelioration of collagen-induced arthritis by human recombinant soluble FcgammaRIIb

Immune complex (IC) binding to Fc gamma receptors (FcgammaRs) is central for inflammatory reactions seen in autoimmune diseases. Consequently, a therapeutic agent with a possibility to interfere with binding of pathogenic IC to FcgammaRs would be valuable in autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we have explored the therapeutic effect of a recombinant soluble human FcgammaRIIb (sFcgammaRIIb) protein in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). In vitro studies of the sFcgammaRIIb demonstrated binding to mouse IgG, suggesting that sFcgammaRIIb can absorb pathogenic IgG anti-collagen type II (CII) IC in vivo. Hence, administration of sFcgammaRIIb significantly reduced CIA severity compared to control treated mice. The sFcgammaRIIb treated mice had significantly less IgG anti-CII antibodies in serum and lower mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to control mice. In conclusion, sFcgammaRIIb treatment ameliorates CIA by reducing IC-stimulated inflammation and joint swelling. This suggests that recombinant sFcgammaRIIb may be useful as therapeutic agent in RA.