Safety and Gadolinium Distribution of the New High-Relaxivity Gadolinium Chelate Gadopiclenol in a Rat Model of Severe Renal Failure

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents (GBCAs) for MRI: A Benefit-Risk Balance Analysis from a Chemical, Biomedical, and Environmental Point of View

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have revolutionized medical imaging, enhancing the accuracy and diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The increasing use of GBCAs has raised concerns about the release of gadolinium (Gd)(III) into the environment and potential risks for human health. Initially, multiple administrations of GBCAs were associated only with nephrogenic system fibrosis disease in individuals with impaired kidney function. Even if the Gd(III) retention in tissues has not yet been correlated with any specific disease, caution is required for the extensive use of GBCAs. The concerns related to the employment of GBCAs, due to the possible deposition and retention, should be extended also to healthy individuals without renal impairments. To ensure the well-being of patients, there is a need to develop even more stable and better-performing GBCAs, new MRI approaches requiring lower doses of GBCAs and, finally, innovative methods for recovering Gd(III) from both patients' urines and the environment. This can have strong advantages for human health and for environmental sustainability, also considering Gd(III) scarcity, being a rare earth element, and the shared guideline to reduce, as much as possible, the use of rare metals.

Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.

RESULTS

Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.

Accumulation of Iron Oxide-Based Contrast Agents in Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques in Relation to Plaque Age and Vulnerability Features

Purpose

In this study, a detailed characterization of a rabbit model of atherosclerosis was performed to assess the optimal time frame for evaluating plaque vulnerability using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (SPION)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

The progression of atherosclerosis induced by ballooning and a high-cholesterol diet was monitored using angiography, and the resulting plaques were characterized using immunohistochemistry and histology. Morphometric analyses were performed to evaluate plaque size and vulnerability features. The accumulation of SPIONs (novel dextran-coated SPIONDex and ferumoxytol) in atherosclerotic plaques was investigated by histology and MRI and correlated with plaque age and vulnerability. Toxicity of SPIONDex was evaluated in rats.

Results

Weak positive correlations were detected between plaque age and intima thickness, and total macrophage load. A strong negative correlation was observed between the minimum fibrous cap thickness and plaque age as well as the mean macrophage load. The accumulation of SPION in the atherosclerotic plaques was detected by MRI 24 h after administration and was subsequently confirmed by Prussian blue staining of histological specimens. Positive correlations between Prussian blue signal in atherosclerotic plaques, plaque age, and macrophage load were detected. Very little iron was observed in the histological sections of the heart and kidney, whereas strong staining of SPIONDex and ferumoxytol was detected in the spleen and liver. In contrast to ferumoxytol, SPIONDex administration in rabbits was well tolerated without inducing hypersensitivity. The maximum tolerated dose in rat model was higher than 100 mg Fe/kg.

Conclusion

Older atherosclerotic plaques with vulnerable features in rabbits are a useful tool for investigating iron oxide-based contrast agents for MRI. Based on the experimental data, SPIONDex particles constitute a promising candidate for further clinical translation as a safe formulation that offers the possibility of repeated administration free from the risks associated with other types of magnetic contrast agents.

Preclinical Safety Assessment of Gadopiclenol: A High-Relaxivity Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based MRI Contrast Agent

OBJECTIVE

Gadopiclenol is a new high-relaxivity macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system and other body regions. The product has been approved by US Food and Drug Administration and is currently being evaluated by European Medicines Agency. For risk assessment of the single diagnostic use in humans, the safety profile of gadopiclenol was evaluated with a series of preclinical studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With exception of dose-ranging studies, all safety pharmacology and toxicology studies were performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice principles. Safety pharmacology studies were conducted to assess potential effects on cardiovascular (in vitro and in dogs), respiratory (in rats and guinea pigs), neurological (in rats), and renal endpoints (in rats). Toxicology studies were also performed to investigate acute toxicity (in rats and mice), extended single-dose (in rats and dogs) and repeated-dose toxicity (in rats and dogs), reproductive (in rats), developmental (in rats and rabbits) and juvenile toxicity (in rats), as well as genotoxicity (in vitro and in rats), local tolerance (in rabbits), potential immediate hypersensitivity (in guinea pigs), and potential tissue retention of gadolinium (in rats).

RESULTS

Safety pharmacology studies conducted at high intravenous (IV) doses showed a satisfactory tolerance of gadopiclenol in the main body systems. After either single or repeated IV dosing (14 and 28 days) in rats and dogs, gadopiclenol was well tolerated even at high doses. The no-observed-adverse-effect level values (ie, the highest experimental dose without adverse effects) representing between 8 times in rats and 44 times in dogs (based on the exposure), the exposure achieved in humans at the intended diagnostic dose, provide a high safety margin. No or only minor and reversible effects on body weight, food consumption, clinical signs, clinical pathology parameters, or histology were observed at the highest doses. The main histological finding consists in renal tubular vacuolations (exacerbated after repeated exposure), which supports a well-known finding for this class of compounds that has no physiological consequence on kidney function. Reproductive toxicity studies showed no evidence of effects on reproductive performance, fertility, perinatal and postnatal development in rats, or reproductive development in rats or rabbits. The safety profile of gadopiclenol in juvenile rats was satisfactory like in adults. Gadopiclenol was not genotoxic in vitro in the Ames test, a mouse lymphoma assay, and a rat in vivo micronucleus test. There were no signs of local intolerance at the injection site after IV and intra-arterial administration in rabbits. However, because of minor signs of intolerance after perivenous administration, misadministration must be avoided. Gadopiclenol exhibited no signs of potential to induce immediate hypersensitivity in guinea pigs.

CONCLUSIONS

High safety margins were observed between the single diagnostic dose of 0.05 mmol/kg in humans and the doses showing effects in animal studies. Gadopiclenol is, therefore, well tolerated in various species (mice, rats, dogs, rabbits, and guinea pigs). All observed preclinical data support the clinical approval.

Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Gadopiclenol: A Newly Emerging Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are one of the most commonly used agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Gadopiclenol is a new GBCA aimed at providing improved diagnostic efficacy with a favorable safety profile. The proposed advantages are due to its specific pharmacological properties, one of which is high relaxivity values. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy, diagnostic accuracy, and safety of gadopiclenol in comparison to other currently used gadolinium-based contrast agents. PubMed and other database systems were used to identify relevant studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, resulting in 10 articles that were included in the review. The outcomes were reviewed according to several factors regarding efficacy and accuracy in terms of qualitative and quantitative descriptors relative to properties of enhancement provided by the contrast agent. In terms of safety profile, a number of outcomes were assessed such as the occurrence of serious adverse effects, severe kidney injury, and organ-based contrast retention. Gadopiclenol was found to provide outcomes comparable to other commonly used GBCAs at lower doses with further favorable results at higher doses while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. However, it was found to have high rates of retention within the liver and can cause nonsignificant QT prolongation in healthy individuals, which arguably creates the need for further research regarding more long-term implications of these possible adverse effects.

Gadolinium retention in a rat model of subtotal renal failure: are there differences among macrocyclic GBCAs?

BACKGROUND

Gd levels are higher in tissues of animals with compromised renal function, but studies to compare levels after exposure to different macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are lacking. We compared Gd levels in tissues of subtotally nephrectomised (SN) rats after repeated exposure to macrocyclic GBCAs.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley SN male rats (19 per group) received 16 injections of gadoteridol, gadobutrol, or gadoterate meglumine at 0.6 mmol Gd/kg 4 times/weeks over 4 weeks. A control group of healthy male rats (n = 10) received gadoteridol at the same dosage. Plasma urea and creatinine levels were monitored. Blood, cerebrum, cerebellum, liver, femur, kidney(s), skin and peripheral nerves were harvested for Gd determination by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry at 28 and 56 days after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Plasma urea and creatinine levels were roughly twofold higher in SN rats than in healthy rats at all timepoints. At day 28, Gd levels in the peripheral nerves of gadobutrol- or gadoterate-treated SN animals were 5.4 or 7.2 times higher than in gadoteridol-treated animals (p < 0.001). Higher Gd levels after administration of gadobutrol or gadoterate versus gadoteridol were also determined in kidneys (p ≤ 0.002), cerebrum (p ≤ 0.001), cerebellum (p ≤ 0.003), skin (p ≥ 0.244), liver (p ≥ 0.053), and femur (p ≥ 0.271). At day 56, lower Gd levels were determined both in SN and healthy rats for all GBCAs and tissues, except the femur.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd tissue levels were lower following gadoteridol exposure than following gadobutrol or gadoterate exposure.

How the Chemical Properties of GBCAs Influence Their Safety Profiles In Vivo

The extracellular class of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is an essential tool for clinical diagnosis and disease management. In order to better understand the issues associated with GBCA administration and gadolinium retention and deposition in the human brain, the chemical properties of GBCAs such as relative thermodynamic and kinetic stabilities and their likelihood of forming gadolinium deposits in vivo will be reviewed. The chemical form of gadolinium causing the hyperintensity is an open question. On the basis of estimates of total gadolinium concentration present, it is highly unlikely that the intact chelate is causing the T1 hyperintensities observed in the human brain. Although it is possible that there is a water-soluble form of gadolinium that has high relaxitvity present, our experience indicates that the insoluble gadolinium-based agents/salts could have high relaxivities on the surface of the solid due to higher water access. This review assesses the safety of GBCAs from a chemical point of view based on their thermodynamic and kinetic properties, discusses how these properties influence in vivo behavior, and highlights some clinical implications regarding the development of future imaging agents.