Triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography with 256-slice computed tomography scanners: patient-specific assessment of radiation burden and associated cancer risk. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:109-115. [PMID: 21857528 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e31822d0cf3]

Optimizing acute chest pain diagnosis: Efficacy of 64-channel multi-slice CT with Snap-Shot Freeze technique in Triple-Rule-out CT angiography

Objective

This study evaluates the efficacy of Snap-Shot Freeze (SSF) technology combined with optimized contrast medium (CM) injection protocols in Triple-Rule-Out (TRO) computed tomography angiography (CTA) using 64-channel multi-slice CT (MSCT) for diagnosing acute chest pain (ACP).

Materials and methods

A total of 111 patients presenting with ACP were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group 1 (23 patients) underwent TRO CTA using 64-channel MSCT with SSF technology, while the control group (88 patients) which was further divided into three cohorts underwent specific site CTA scans. Quantitative metrics such as CT values, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for pulmonary artery, coronary arteries, and aortic imaging. Demographic characteristics, image qualification rate and disease diagnosis rate of groups 1-4 were also evaluated. Qualitative evaluations were based on a 5-point scoring system assessing overall image quality, vessel clarity, and artifact presence. Radiation doses were measured in terms of CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and effective dose (ED).

Results

The demographic characteristics of the patients showed no significant differences in age, BMI, or resting heart rate between Group 1 and the control group. The image qualification rate was 100 % for both groups, with excellent rates of 89.13 % in Group 1 and 85.67 % in the control group. No significant differences were found in average CT values, standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between Group 1 and the control group for pulmonary artery (e.g., PT: 394.25 ± 124.19 vs 383.64 ± 115.72 HU, p = 0.74), coronary artery (e.g., AA: 483.71 ± 115.62 vs 493.95 ± 138.54 HU, p = 0.79), and aorta (e.g., AAo: 325.1 ± 99.39 vs 348.98 ± 74.23 HU, p = 0.34). Qualitative image quality scores and radiation doses were also comparable (e.g., ED: 28.36 ± 12.6 vs 29.97 ± 10.36 mSv, p = 0.77). Qualitative assessments also revealed comparable image quality scores between the two groups (4.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 0.6). The total volume of iodinated CM was significantly reduced in Group 1 (66 mL vs 227 mL).

Conclusion

The use of 64-channel MSCT combined with SSF technology in TRO CTA provides noninferior high-quality imaging comparable to traditional specific site CTA, with the added benefits of reduced CM volume and shorter examination times. This approach is effective for the comprehensive evaluation of ACP in clinical practice.

Digital phantom versus patient-specific radiation dosimetry in adult routine thorax CT examinations

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the organ doses assessed through a digital phantom-based and a patient specific-based dosimetric tool in adult routine thorax computed tomography (CT) examinations with reference to physical dose measurements performed in anthropomorphic phantoms.

METHODS

Two Monte Carlo based dose calculation tools were used to assess organ doses in routine adult thorax CT examinations. These were a digital phantom-based dosimetry tool (NCICT, National Cancer Institute, USA) and a patient-specific individualized dosimetry tool (ImpactMC, CT Imaging GmbH, Germany). Digital phantoms and patients were classified in four groups according to their water equivalent diameter (Dw). Normalized to volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), organ dose was assessed for lungs, esophagus, heart, breast, active bone marrow, and skin. Organ doses were compared to measurements performed using thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) in two physical anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate the average adult individual as a male (Alderson Research Labs, USA) and as a female (ATOM Phantoms, USA).

RESULTS

The average percent difference of NCICT to TLD and ImpactMC to TLD dose measurements across all organs in both sexes was 13% and 6%, respectively. The average ± 1 standard deviation in dose values across all organs with NCICT, ImpactMC, and TLDs was ± 0.06 (mGy/mGy), ± 0.19 (mGy/mGy), and ± 0.13 (mGy/mGy), respectively. Organ doses decreased with increasing Dw in both NCICT and ImpactMC.

CONCLUSION

Organ doses estimated with ImpactMC were in closer agreement to TLDs compared to NCICT. This may be attributed to the inherent property of ImpactMC methodology to generate phantoms that resemble the realistic anatomy of the examined patient as opposed to NCICT methodology that incorporates an anatomical discrepancy between phantoms and patients.

CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is still uncertainty on whether ionizing radiation from CT scans can increase the risks of cancer. This study aimed to identify the association of cumulative ionizing radiation from CT scans with pertaining cancer risks in adults.

METHODS

Five databases were searched from their inception to November 15, 2020. Observational studies reporting cancer risks from CT scans in adults were included. The main outcome included quantified cancer risks as cancer case numbers in exposed/unexposed adult participants with unified converted measures to odds ratio (OR) for relative risk, hazard ratio. Global background radiation (2.4 mSv per year) was used as control for lifetime attribution risk (LAR), with the same period from incubation after exposure until survival to 100 years.

RESULTS

25 studies were included with a sum of 111,649,943 participants (mean age: 45.37 years, 83.4% women), comprising 2,049,943 actual participants from 6 studies with an average follow-up period as 30.1 years (range, 5 to 80 years); 109,600,000 participants from 19 studies using LAR. The cancer risks for adults following CT scans were inordinately increased (LAR adults, OR, 10.00 [95% CI, 5.87 to 17.05]; actual adults, OR, 1.17 [95%CI, 0.89 to 1.55]; combined, OR, 5.89 [95%CI, 3.46 to 10.35]). Moreover, cancer risks elevated with increase of radiation dose (OR, 33.31 [95% CI, 21.33 to 52.02]), and multiple CT scan sites (OR, 14.08 [95% CI, 6.60 to 30.05]). The risk of solid malignancy was higher than leukemia. Notably, there were no significant differences for age, gender, country, continent, study quality and studying time phrases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on 111.6 million adult participants from 3 continents (Asia, Europe and America), this meta-analysis identifies an inordinately increase in cancer risks from CT scans for adults. Moreover, the cancer risks were positively correlated with radiation dose and CT sites. The meta-analysis highlights the awareness of potential cancer risks of CT scans as well as more reasonable methodology to quantify cancer risks in terms of life expectancy as 100 years for LAR.

PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019133487.

Organ doses and normalized organ doses for various age groups in ultralow dose pediatric C-arm cone-beam CT

OBJECTIVES

To estimate organ dose to major radiosensitive organs during pediatric body C-arm CBCT and determine normalized organ doses using a state-of-the-art equipment.

METHODS

This is a study performed utilizing physical anthropomorphic phantoms. Four anthropomorphic phantoms that simulate the average individual as a neonate, 1-year-old, 5-year-old, and 10-year-old child were used. Personalized Monte Carlo (MC)-based dosimetry was performed to estimate organ doses in children referred to thorax and abdomen C-arm CBCT acquisitions on a recently released latest generation C-arm CBCT system. Age-specific normalized organ doses were generated and organ dose was estimated for skin, bone, breast, lungs, esophagus, thymus, and heart, in the thorax, and liver, adrenals, kidneys, pancreas, stomach, gall bladder, and spleen in the abdomen. Estimated doses were compared to corresponding values obtained with physical measurements performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD).

RESULTS

The results consist of organ doses for thorax and abdomen acquisition protocols. The majority of organs received a dose below 1 mSv. For all ages, the normalized organ doses decreased from neonate to 10-year-old. The difference between the organ doses obtained with MC and TLDs was less than 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Normalized organ doses in pediatric C-arm CBCT varied with age. Pediatric C-arm CBCT with latest-generation systems may be performed with sub mGy dose for most organs.

KEY POINTS

• The dose to the majority of organs from pediatric C-arm CBCT is in the sub mSv level. • The normalized organ doses decreased from neonate to 10-year-old. • Reported normalized organ doses may be used to estimate organ dose in pediatric C-arm cone-beam CT on modern equipment.

Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations

Objectives

To investigate the effect of an organ-based tube current modulation (OTCM) technique on organ absorbed dose and assess image quality in pediatric CT examinations.

Methods

Four physical anthropomorphic phantoms that represent the average individual as neonate, 1-year-old, 5-year-old, and 10-year-old were used. Standard head and thorax acquisitions were performed with automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) and ATCM+OTCM. Dose calculations were performed by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Radiation dose was measured for superficial and centrally located radiosensitive organs. The angular range of the OTCM exposure window was determined for different tube rotation times (t) by means of a solid-state detector. Image noise was measured as the standard deviation of the Hounsfield unit value in regions of interest drawn at selected anatomical sites.

Results

ATCM+OTCM resulted in a reduction of radiation dose to all radiosensitive organs. In head, eye lens dose was reduced by up to 13% in ATCM+OTCM compared with ATCM. In thorax, the corresponding reduction for breast dose was up to 10%. The angular range of the OTCM exposure window decreased with t. For t = 0.4 s, the angular range was limited to 74° in head and 135° for thorax. Image noise was significantly increased in ATCM+OTCM acquisitions across most examined phantoms (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

OTCM reduces radiation dose to exposed radiosensitive organs with the eye lens and breast buds exhibiting the highest dose reduction. The OTCM exposure window is narrowed at short t. An increase in noise is inevitable in images located within the OTCM-activated imaged volume.

Key Points

• In pediatric CT, organ-based tube current modulation reduces radiation dose to all major primarily exposed radiosensitive organs.

• Image noise increases within the organ-based tube current modulation enabled imaged volume.

• The angular range of the organ-based tube current modulation low exposure window is reduced with tube rotation time.

Assessment of image quality and dose in contrast-enhanced head and neck CT angiography of New Zealand rabbit

BACKGROUND

Although computed tomography (CT) is a powerful diagnostic imaging modality for diagnosing vascular diseases, it is some what risky to human health due to the high radiation dosage. Thus, CT vendors have developed low dose computed tomography (LDCT) aiming to solve this problem. Nowadays, LDCT has gradually become a main stream of CT examination.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of LDCTAin an animal model and compare the imaging features and doses in two clinical scanners.

METHODS

Twenty-two New Zealand rabbit head and neck CTA images pre- and post-contrast agent injection were performed using256-sliceand 64-slice CT scanners. The tube voltages used in the 256-slice and the 64-slice CTA were 70 kVp and 80 kVp, respectively. Quantitative images indices and radiation doses obtained from CTA in these two scanners were compared.

RESULTS

More neck arterial vessels could be visualized in multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) CTA on the 256-slice CT scanner than on the 64-slice CT scanner. After contrast agent injection, all observed neck arterial vessels had higher CT numbers in 256-slice CTA than in 64-slice CTA. There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise (CNR) of CTA images between these two scanners. CT dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP) for the 256-slice CTA were lower than those for the 64-slice CTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose CTA of rabbits with 70 or 80 kVp is feasible in a 256-slice or a 64-slice CT scanner. The radiation dose from the 256-slice CTA was much lower than that from the 64-slice CTA with comparable SNR and CNR. The technique can be further applied in longitudinal monitoring of an animal stroke model in the future.

Reduction of radiation dose for coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch acquisition in clinical routine

Purpose

To evaluate the image quality, radiation exposure, and means of application in a group of patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) performed with low-dose prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered acquisition in which a standard sequence was added if the low-dose sequence did not allow reliable exclusion of coronary stenosis with respect to image quality.

Material and methods

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors performed a retrospective review of 256 consecutive patients referred for CCTA using dual-source CT scanner (Definition FLASH, Siemens, Germany). CCTA was performed using prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch acquisition. In patients with higher heart rates (> 65 bpm) or in whom irregular heart rates were noted prior to the scan, a subsequent CCTA was performed immediately (double flash protocol). The effective radiation dose was calculated for each patient. All images were evaluated by two independent observers for quality on a four-point scale with 1 being non-diagnostic image quality and 4 being excellent.

Results

Mean effective whole-body dose of CCTA was 1.6 ± 0.4 mSv (range, 0.4-5.4) for the entire cardiac examination and 0.9 ± 0.3 mSv (range, 0.4-2.8) for individual prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTAs. In 27 of these patients with higher heart rates or occasional premature ventricular contractions or atrial fibrillation, subsequent CCTAs were performed immediately. The average image quality score was good to excellent with less than 1% unevaluable coronary segments. The double flash protocol resulted in a fully diagnostic CCTA in all cases.

Conclusions

The prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA technique is feasible and promising in clinical routine with good to excellent image quality and minimal radiation dose. The double flash protocol might become a more robust tool in patients with higher heart rates or arrhythmia.

Cardiovascular Imaging: The Past and the Future, Perspectives in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Today's noninvasive imaging of the cardiovascular system has revolutionized the approach to various diseases and has substantially affected prognostic information. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomographic (CT) imaging are at center stage of these approaches, although 5 decades ago, these technologies were unheard of. Both modalities had their inception in the 1970s with a primary focus on noncardiovascular applications. The technical development of the various decades, however, substantially pushed the envelope for cardiovascular MR and CT applications. Within the past 10-15 years, MR and CT technologies have pushed each other in cardiac applications; and without the "rival" modality, neither one would likely not have reached its potential today. This view on the history of MR and CT in the field of cardiovascular applications provides insight into the story of success of applications that once have been ideas only but are at prime time today.

Organ Doses and Radiation Risk of Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography in a Clinical Patient Population: How Do Low-Dose Acquisition Modes Compare?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the organ doses and lifetime-attributable risk of cancer for electrocardiogram-triggered sequential and high-pitch helical scanning in a clinical patient population.

METHODS

Phantom thermoluminiscence dosimeter measurements were used as a model for the organ dose assessment of 314 individual patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography. Patient-specific lifetime-attributable cancer risks were calculated.

RESULTS

Phantom measurements showed that heart rate had a significant influence on the delivered radiation exposure in sequential mode, and calcium scoring and contrast bolus tracking scans make a nonnegligible contribution to patients' dose. Therefore, they should be taken into account for patients' organ dose estimations. Median cancer induction risks are low, with 0.008% (0.0016%) and 0.022% (0.056%) for high-pitch and sequential scanning for men (women), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of high-pitch helical scanning leads to 65% and 72% lower lifetime-attributable risk values for men and women, respectively, compared with sequential scanning.

Dose reduction of the female breast in chest CT

OBJECTIVE

Organ-based tube current modulation has been shown to significantly reduce the radiation dose to the female breast in phantom studies. We sought to assess the proportions of female breast and glandular tissues that are within the range of organ-based tube current modulation in different age groups and whether these proportions could be optimized by clothing. The secondary objective of our study was to determine whether metal parts of brassieres cause artifacts that impair the diagnostic value.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Five hundred seventy-eight female patients undergoing chest CT were included in this study. Two hundred nine patients were prospectively examined wearing a brassiere (group A), and the control patients (group B; n = 369) were scanned according to our previous standard without wearing a brassiere during CT. The two groups were subdivided according to cup size (A-E). For CT data acquisition, an angle-dependent tube current modulation, which reduces the tube current for anterior tube position to minimize direct exposure to anteriorly located organs, was used. The proportion of breast tissue and glandular tissue located within and outside the region of tube current reduction was assessed.

RESULTS

The results showed that 60.4% of total breast tissue and 67.1% of glandular tissue was inside the region of tube current reduction in group B; the proportions were significantly improved, to an average of 91.3% and 96%, respectively, in group A. Diagnostically relevant artifacts were introduced in none of the patients. Patients' age correlated with this effect, with higher rates of improvement in the older patient group. Angle-dependent tube current modulation was most effective in patients with cup size A while wearing a brassiere. In this group, 97.5% of breast tissue and 98.1% of glandular tissue was inside the region of tube current reduction. Women with a cup size of E had the largest effect of wearing a brassiere, increasing the rate of breast tissue that was affected by angle-dependent tube current modulation from 30.0% to 83.3% and that of glandular tissue from 31.8% to 90.0%.

CONCLUSION

We show that wearing a brassiere increases the percentage of breast tissue within the region of reduced tube current and, therefore, improves the performance of angle-dependent tube current modulation technique.

The cumulative risk of multiple CT exposures using two different methods

The aim of this study was to compare the summing method (A) with the complement method (B) for calculating the cumulative lifetime-attributable-risk (LAR(tot)) of tumor incidence and mortality of multiple CT exposures. Method A defines LAR(tot) as the summation of the risk of each separate exposure. Method B was defined as the complement of the probability of inducing no cancer in N separate exposures. The risk of each separate exposure was estimated using dose, gender, and age at exposure (BEIR VII phase 2). Both methods were compared in a simulation and applied to a database of 11,884 patients exposed to multiple CTs. The relative difference between the methods was defined as ΔP%. Simulation confirmed that Method A always overestimates LAR(tot). ΔP% was proportional to the dose per exposure and the number of exposures. The differences between Methods A and B were small. Average LAR(tot) of tumor incidence was 0.140% (Method A) and 0.139% (Method B) with maxima of 5.70% and 5.56%, respectively. Average LAR(tot) of mortality was 0.085% for both methods, with maxima of 2.20% and 2.18%, respectively. ΔP% was highest (2.43%) for a female patient (3-y old) exposed to eight recurrent scans and a cumulative dose of 144 mSv. Although Method B is more accurate, both methods can be used to estimate the cumulative risk of multiple CT exposures. These results have to be interpreted, however, in the perspective of the uncertainties in the cancer risk model, which have been estimated at a factor of 2 or 3.

Radiation Exposure of Patients by Cone Beam CT during Endobronchial Navigation - A Phantom Study

Rationale: Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging has become increasingly important in many fields of interventional therapies. Objective: Lung navigation study which is an uncommon soft tissue approach. Methods: As no effective organ radiation dose levels were available for this kind of Cone Beam Computed Tomography application we simulated in our DynaCT (Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany) suite 2 measurements including 3D acquisition and again for 3D acquisition and 4 endobronchial navigation maneuvers under fluoroscopy towards a nodule after the 8^th segmentation in the right upper lobe over a total period of 20 minutes (min). These figures reflect the average complexity and time in our experience. We hereby describe the first time the exact protocol of lung navigation by a Cone Beam Computed Tomography approach. Measurement: The hereby first time measured body radiation doses in that approach showed very promising numbers between 0,98-1,15mSv giving specific lung radiation doses of 0,42-0,38 mSv. Main results: These figures are comparable or even better to other lung navigation systems. Cone Beam Computed Tomography offers some unique features for lung interventionists as a realtime 1-step navigation system in an open structure feasible for endobronchial and transcutaneous approach. Conclusions: Due to this low level of radiation exposure Cone Beam Computed Tomography is expected to attract interventionists interested in using and guiding endobronchial or transcutaneous ablative procedures to peripheral endobronchial and other lung lesions.

Radiation risks associated with serial imaging in colorectal cancer patients: Should we worry?

To provide an overview of the radiation related cancer risk associated with multiple computed tomographic scans required for follow up in colorectal cancer patients. A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was carried out and limited to the last 10 years from December 2012. Inclusion criteria were studies where computed tomographic scans or radiation from other medical imaging modalities were used and the risks associated with ionizing radiation reported. Thirty-six studies were included for appraisal with no randomized controlled trials. Thirty-four of the thirty-six studies showed a positive association between medical imaging radiation and increased risk of cancer. The radiation dose absorbed and cancer risk was greater in children and young adults than in older patients. Most studies included in the review used a linear, no-threshold model to calculate cancer risks and this may not be applicable at low radiation doses. Many studies are retrospective and ensuring complete follow up on thousands of patients is difficult. There was a minor increased risk of cancer from ionizing radiation in medical imaging studies. The radiation risks of low dose exposure (< 50 milli-Sieverts) are uncertain. A clinically justified scan in the context of colorectal cancer is likely to provide more benefits than harm but current guidelines for patient follow up will need to be revised to accommodate a more aggressive approach to treating metastatic disease.

Current knowledge on tumour induction by computed tomography should be carefully used

Risks associated to ionising radiation from medical imaging techniques have focused the attention of the medical society and general population. This risk is aimed to determine the probability that a tumour is induced as a result of a computed tomography (CT) examination since it makes nowadays the biggest contribution to the collective dose. Several models of cancer induction have been reported in the literature, with diametrically different implications. This article reviews those models, focusing on the ones used by the scientific community to estimate CT detriments. Current estimates of the probability that a CT examination induces cancer are reported, highlighting its low magnitude (near the background level) and large sources of uncertainty. From this objective review, it is concluded that epidemiological data with more accurate dosimetric estimates are needed. Prediction of the number of tumours that will be induced in population exposed to ionising radiation should be avoided or, if given, it should be accompanied by a realistic evaluation of its uncertainty and of the advantages of CTs. Otherwise they may have a negative impact in both the medical community and the patients. Reducing doses even more is not justified if that compromises clinical image quality in a necessary investigation. Key Points • Predictions of radiation-induced cancer should be discussed alongside benefits of imaging. • Estimates of induced cancers have noticeable uncertainties that should always be highlighted. • There is controversy about the acceptance of the linear no-threshold model. • Estimated extra risks of cancer are close to the background level. • Patients should not be alarmed by potential cancer induction by CT examinations.

Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk of patients with ischemic heart diseases from diagnostic and therapeutic imaging procedures

OBJECTIVES

To present a detailed analysis of the cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk of patients with ischemic heart diseases (IHD) from diagnostic and therapeutic imaging.

METHODS

For 1219 IHD patients, personal and examination data were retrieved from the information systems of a university hospital. For each patient, cumulative organ doses and the corresponding effective dose (E) resulting from all imaging procedures performed within 3 months before and 12 months after the date of the diagnosis were calculated. The cumulative lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of the patients to be diseased by radiation-related cancer was estimated using sex-, age-, and organ-specific risk models.

RESULTS

Among the 3870 procedures performed in the IHD patients, the most frequent were radiographic examinations (52.4%) followed by coronary catheter angiographies and percutaneous cardiac interventions (41.3%), CT scans (3.9%), and perfusion SPECT (2.3%). 87% of patient exposure resulted from heart catheter procedures. E and LAR were significantly higher in males than females (average, 13.3 vs. 10.3 mSv and 0.09 vs. 0.07%, respectively). Contrary to the effective dose, the cancer risk decreased markedly for both sexes with increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS

Although IHD patients were partially exposed to considerable amounts of radiation, estimated LARs were small as compared to their baseline risk to develop cancer in the remaining life.

[Possibilities for exposure reduction in computed tomography examination of acute chest pain]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Electrocardiogram-gated (ECG) computed tomography (CT) investigations can be accompanied by high amounts of radiation exposure. This is particularly true for the investigation of patients with unclear and acute chest pain.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

The common approach in patients with acute chest pain is standard spiral CT of the chest.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

The chest pain or triple-rule-out CT protocol is a relatively new ECG-gated protocol of the entire chest. This article reviews and discusses different techniques for the CT investigation of patients with acute chest pain.

PERFORMANCE

By applying the appropriate scan technique, the radiation exposure for an ECG-gated protocol must not necessarily be higher than a standard chest CT scan

ACHIEVEMENTS

Aortic pathologies are far better depicted by ECG-gated scan protocols and depending on the heart rate coronary artery disease can also be detected at the same time.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The use of ECG-triggered scans will not support the diagnostics of the pulmonary arteries. However, in unspecific chest pain an ECG-triggered scan protocol can provide information on the differential diagnosis.

The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects?

PURPOSE

To determine patient-specific absorbed peak doses to skin, eye lens, brain parenchyma, and cranial red bone marrow (RBM) of adult individuals subjected to low-dose brain perfusion CT studies on a 256-slice CT scanner, and investigate the effect of patient head size∕shape, head position during the examination and bowtie filter used on peak tissue doses.

METHODS

The peak doses to eye lens, skin, brain, and RBM were measured in 106 individual-specific adult head phantoms subjected to the standard low-dose brain perfusion CT on a 256-slice CT scanner using a novel Monte Carlo simulation software dedicated for patient CT dosimetry. Peak tissue doses were compared to corresponding thresholds for induction of cataract, erythema, cerebrovascular disease, and depression of hematopoiesis, respectively. The effects of patient head size∕shape, head position during acquisition and bowtie filter used on resulting peak patient tissue doses were investigated. The effect of eye-lens position in the scanned head region was also investigated. The effect of miscentering and use of narrow bowtie filter on image quality was assessed.

RESULTS

The mean peak doses to eye lens, skin, brain, and RBM were found to be 124, 120, 95, and 163 mGy, respectively. The effect of patient head size and shape on peak tissue doses was found to be minimal since maximum differences were less than 7%. Patient head miscentering and bowtie filter selection were found to have a considerable effect on peak tissue doses. The peak eye-lens dose saving achieved by elevating head by 4 cm with respect to isocenter and using a narrow wedge filter was found to approach 50%. When the eye lies outside of the primarily irradiated head region, the dose to eye lens was found to drop to less than 20% of the corresponding dose measured when the eye lens was located in the middle of the x-ray beam. Positioning head phantom off-isocenter by 4 cm and employing a narrow wedge filter results in a moderate reduction of signal-to-noise ratio mainly to the peripheral region of the phantom.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite typical peak doses to skin, eye lens, brain, and RBM from the standard low-dose brain perfusion 256-slice CT protocol are well below the corresponding thresholds for the induction of erythema, cataract, cerebrovascular disease, and depression of hematopoiesis, respectively, every effort should be made toward optimization of the procedure and minimization of dose received by these tissues. The current study provides evidence that the use of the narrower bowtie filter available may considerably reduce peak absorbed dose to all above radiosensitive tissues with minimal deterioration in image quality. Considerable reduction in peak eye-lens dose may also be achieved by positioning patient head center a few centimeters above isocenter during the exposure.

Screening computed tomography colonography with 256-slice scanning: should patient radiation burden and associated cancer risk constitute a major concern?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the radiation burden and the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of radiation-induced cancer in patients undergoing screening 256-slice computed tomography colonography (CTC) and compare CTC-related radiogenic risks to corresponding nominal lifetime intrinsic risk of cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Monte Carlo simulation software dedicated for computed tomography (CT) dosimetry was used to determine absorbed doses to primarily exposed radiosensitive organs of 31 women and 29 men subjected to screening CTC on a 256-slice CT scanner. Effective dose was estimated from (a) organ dose data and (b) dose-length product. Organ-specific and total LARs of cancer were estimated using published risk factors. Cumulative LARs from repeated CTC studies on individuals participating in a colorectal cancer screening program were compared with corresponding lifetime intrinsic risks.

RESULTS

The mean organ dose-derived effective dose was estimated to be 2.92 and 2.61 mSv for female and male individuals, respectively. The dose-length product method was found to overestimate effective dose from CTC by 26% and 13% in female and male individuals, respectively. Compared with previously published results for 64-slice CT scanners, 256-slice CTC was found to be associated with up to 45% less radiation burden. The cumulative LAR of radiation-induced cancer from repeated quinquennial screening CTC studies between the ages of 50 and 80 years was estimated to increase the lifetime intrinsic risk of cancer by less than 0.2%.

CONCLUSION

The level of patient radiation burden and theoretical radiogenic cancer risks associated with screening CTC performed using modern low-dose protocols and techniques may not justify disapproval of CTC as a mass screening tool.