Prognostic Value of Bone Scintigraphy in Cancer Patients With Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Clinical effectiveness of 3D SPECT/CT imaging in determining osteotomy range for surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of 3D SPECT/CT imaging in determining the osteotomy range during surgical treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) when combined with composite tissue flap techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 12 patients diagnosed with MRONJ. Each patient underwent a 3D SPECT/CT examination prior to surgery, where the region of interest (ROI) was outlined in the 3D images. During surgery, the affected bone was excised 0.5 cm beyond the delineated ROI. Various types of composite tissue flaps were utilized to close the defects based on their size and location.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for an average of 7.9 months (range: 6-12 months), with all 12 achieving successful outcomes devoid of complications such as pyorrhea.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of 3D SPECT/CT enhances the precision of determining the osteotomy range in MRONJ surgeries. Coupled with composite tissue flap techniques for defect closure, this approach yields favorable clinical outcomes.

Quantitative Analysis of Multimodal Skeletal SPECT/CT Reconstructions in Diagnosing Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

AIM

Our goal was to assess visual and quantitative aspects of multimodal skeletal SPECT/CT reconstructions (recon) in differentiating necrotic and healthy bone of patients with suspected MRONJ.

METHODS

Prior to surgery, 20 patients with suspected MRONJ underwent SPECT/CT of the jaw 3-4 hours after injection of Tc-99m-DPD (622±112.4 MBq). SPECT/CT data were reconstructed using the multimodal xSPECT Bone and xSPECT Quant algorithms as well as the OSEM-algorithm FLASH 3D. For analysis, we divided the jaw into 12 separate regions. Both xSPECT Bone and FLASH 3D datasets were scored on a four-point scale (VIS xSPECT; VIS F3D), based on the intensity of localized tracer uptake. In F3D and xSPECT Quant datasets, local tracer uptake of each region was recorded as semi-quantitative uptake ratio (SQR F3D) or SUVs, respectively. ROC analysis was performed. Postoperative histologic results served as gold standard.

RESULTS

VIS F3D, VIS xSPECT and SQR F3D did not differ significantly in diagnostic accuracy (VIS xSPECT sensitivity=0.64; specificity=0.89). Of the quantitative parameters, SUVpeak yielded the best interobserver reproducibility. SUVpeak was 9.9±7.1 (95%CI: 7.84-11.95) in MRONJ regions, as opposed 3.6±1.8 (95% CI:3.36-3.88) elsewhere, with a cutpoint of 4.5 (sensitivity=0.83; specificity=0.80). Absolute quantitation significantly surpassed VIS and SQR (p<0.05) in accuracy and interobserver agreement (SUVpeak: κ=0.92; VIS xSPECT: κ=0.61; SQR F3D κ=0.66).

CONCLUSION

Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.

The role, efficacy and outcome measures for teriparatide use in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a complex disease which can be associated with multiple morbidities and is challenging to treat. This review evaluates the literature on the role and efficacy of teriparatide (TPTD) as a treatment for MRONJ. The clinical, radiological, histopathological and serological parameters used to assess treatment response have been described. Electronic databases were searched to retrieve articles (April 2005 and April 2020) based on strict inclusion criteria. Seventeen articles were included in this review. Of the 91 patients treated; only six received TPTD as a standalone treatment. There were significant variations in defining treatment outcomes and measuring treatment response. The longest follow-up period was 26 months, and 12 studies failed to report follow-up. The overall quality of evidence is weak with potential for a high risk of bias, making it difficult to determine the efficacy of TPTD and its long-term effects. However, TPTD may play a role in the treatment of intractable MRONJ in osteoporotic patients or those unfit for surgery. Therefore, randomized clinical trials on larger patient cohorts with long-term follow-up is required to confirm efficacy, safety and inform treatment indications for TPTD in the treatment of MRONJ.

A comparative effectiveness pilot study of teriparatide for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: daily versus weekly administration

We studied the effectiveness of teriparatide (TPTD) for treating medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with osteoporosis and examined differences in the clinical outcomes following daily versus weekly TPTD. The outcomes were significantly improved in the entire patient series and the daily group.

PURPOSE

Teriparatide (TPTD) treatment for Stage II-III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in osteoporotic patients has yielded promising results in uncontrolled studies. The daily administration and the weekly administration of TPTD have been reported to improve outcomes in MRONJ. Herein, we sought to identify differences in the clinical outcomes of MRONJ patients treated with daily TPTD versus weekly TPTD.

METHODS

We enrolled 13 patients and randomly assigned them to receive either of two treatments: 1×/week 56.5-μg TPTD injection for 6 months (weekly group; n = 6 patients after 1 dropout), or 20-μg TPTD injection daily for 6 months (daily group; n = 6 patients). Patients in both groups received conventional therapy plus intensive antibiotic therapy as necessary. We compared the changes in the patients' clinical stage of MRONJ, bone metabolism, percentage of bone formation, and bone turnover markers between the weekly and daily groups.

RESULTS

TPTD treatment with MRONJ led to partial remission or complete remission in 5 daily-group patients and 3 weekly-group patients. The MRONJ stage was significantly improved from baseline to 6 months of treatment in the entire series of 12 patients (p = 0.008); the weekly group did not show significant improvement, but the daily group did (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first comparison of clinical outcomes between MRONJ patients who received daily or weekly TPTD injections. Six months of treatment with TPTD realized a significant improvement of MRONJ stage in both the entire patient series and the daily group.

Molecular imaging of bone metastases using bone targeted tracers

Molecular imaging using bone targeted tracers has been used in clinical practice for almost fifty years and still plays an essential role in the diagnosis and follow-up of bone metastases. It includes both [99mTc]bisphosphonates for bone scan and [18F]NaF for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) which are very sensitive to detect osteoblastic activity, but it is important to consider several aspects to increase the specificity of reported findings (such as specific tracer characteristics and mechanism of action, patient's clinical history, common metastatic patterns, changes after treatment, limitations of the technique, variations and pitfalls). This will enable useful information for clinical management being provided in the report. Furthermore, iatrogenic skeletal adverse events are common and they should also be identified, as they have impact on patient's quality of life. This review makes a brief summary of the mechanism of action of bone targeted tracers, followed by a discussion of classic patterns of bone metastasis, treatment response assessment and iatrogenic skeletal complications. The value of hybrid imaging techniques with bone targeted tracers, including single photon emission computed tomography and PET/CT is also explored. The final part summarizes new bone targeted tracers with superior imaging characteristics that are being developed, and which may further enhance the applications of radionuclide bone imaging.

Symposium: Imaging modalities for drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (1), role of imaging in drug-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An up-to-date review (secondary publication)

MRONJ/ARONJ is a serious adverse effect of medication, although the incidence of the disease is rare, and there are still controversial issues regarding the pathogenesis of MRONJ/ARONJ. Medications that can lead to MRONJ/ARONJ are commonly used to treat osteoporosis and to prevent bone fractures caused by bone metastasis of malignancies. The long-standing disease state of ONJ deteriorates the quality of life of affected patients. Early detection and prevention of the disease are key to alleviating pain and discomfort. To date, several imaging modalities have been introduced to depict the lesions. Imaging modalities, radiography, CT, MRI and nuclear medicine provide important information for managing this challenging disease.

Highlights from 2017: impactful topics published in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine

The aim of the review is to highlight articles published in 2017 in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine, an official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Among all published manuscripts during the past year, we conducted a subjective selection of the most relevant topics. Fourteen fascinating articles are included in this review, ranging in topic from preclinical to clinical arenas.

The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy

PURPOSE

The radionuclide bone scan is the cornerstone of skeletal nuclear medicine imaging. Bone scintigraphy is a highly sensitive diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging technique that uses a radiotracer to evaluate the distribution of active bone formation in the skeleton related to malignant and benign disease, as well as physiological processes.

METHODS

The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) has written and approved these guidelines to promote the use of nuclear medicine procedures of high quality.

CONCLUSION

The present guidelines offer assistance to nuclear medicine practitioners in optimizing the diagnostic procedure and interpreting bone scintigraphy. These guidelines describe the protocols that are currently accepted and used routinely, but do not include all existing procedures. They should therefore not be taken as exclusive of other nuclear medicine modalities that can be used to obtain comparable results. It is important to remember that the resources and facilities available for patient care may vary.

Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus

This work provides a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2014 pertaining to the incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), and offers recommendations for its management based on multidisciplinary international consensus. ONJ is associated with oncology-dose parenteral antiresorptive therapy of bisphosphonates (BP) and denosumab (Dmab). The incidence of ONJ is greatest in the oncology patient population (1% to 15%), where high doses of these medications are used at frequent intervals. In the osteoporosis patient population, the incidence of ONJ is estimated at 0.001% to 0.01%, marginally higher than the incidence in the general population (<0.001%). New insights into the pathophysiology of ONJ include antiresorptive effects of BPs and Dmab, effects of BPs on gamma delta T-cells and on monocyte and macrophage function, as well as the role of local bacterial infection, inflammation, and necrosis. Advances in imaging include the use of cone beam computerized tomography assessing cortical and cancellous architecture with lower radiation exposure, magnetic resonance imaging, bone scanning, and positron emission tomography, although plain films often suffice. Other risk factors for ONJ include glucocorticoid use, maxillary or mandibular bone surgery, poor oral hygiene, chronic inflammation, diabetes mellitus, ill-fitting dentures, as well as other drugs, including antiangiogenic agents. Prevention strategies for ONJ include elimination or stabilization of oral disease prior to initiation of antiresorptive agents, as well as maintenance of good oral hygiene. In those patients at high risk for the development of ONJ, including cancer patients receiving high-dose BP or Dmab therapy, consideration should be given to withholding antiresorptive therapy following extensive oral surgery until the surgical site heals with mature mucosal coverage. Management of ONJ is based on the stage of the disease, size of the lesions, and the presence of contributing drug therapy and comorbidity. Conservative therapy includes topical antibiotic oral rinses and systemic antibiotic therapy. Localized surgical debridement is indicated in advanced nonresponsive disease and has been successful. Early data have suggested enhanced osseous wound healing with teriparatide in those without contraindications for its use. Experimental therapy includes bone marrow stem cell intralesional transplantation, low-level laser therapy, local platelet-derived growth factor application, hyperbaric oxygen, and tissue grafting.

Imaging findings of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a critical review of the quantitative studies

Objectives. This paper offers a critical review of published information on the imaging strategies used for diagnosing bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) in patients taking intravenous bisphosphonates, pointing at the different methodologies and results of existing literature. Methods. Electronic literature search was performed in order to identify as many quantitative studies that discussed the imaging findings of BRONJ up to February 2014. Initially, the search for articles was based on the following four types of imaging modalities for evaluating BRONJ: computed tomography, plain film radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear bone scanning. Results. Eleven out of the 79 initially selected articles met the inclusion criteria. Most of the selected articles were cross-sectional studies. Regarding the selected studies, 54.5% have used plain films radiographs and 54.5% were based on computed tomography findings. All of the selected studies showed a small number of patients and none of the selected studies have tested the accuracy of the imaging examination for evaluating BRONJ. Conclusions. This critical review showed a scarcity of quantitative studies that analyzed the typical imaging findings related to BRONJ. Further studies are necessary in order to analyze the role of different imaging techniques in the assessment of BRONJ.