Preventing Allergic Reactions to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents

CAR/CSACI Practice Guidance for Contrast Media Hypersensitivity

Contrast media, including iodinated contrast media and gadolinium-based contrast agents, are commonly administered pharmaceuticals with excellent safety profiles. However, a minority of the population may experience a hypersensitivity reaction following intravenous administration. Hypersensitivity reactions can be immediate or delayed, and range from mild, such as urticaria, to severe, including anaphylaxis. There is emerging evidence that longstanding pretreatment protocols, such as diphenhydramine and corticosteroids, are ineffective and have the potential for side effects and other harms. Moreover, the evidence for efficacy on which this practice is based is weak and outdated. A joint collaborative working group of representatives from the Canadian Association of Radiologists and the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology was assembled to inform medical professionals and hospital policies regarding hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media. The objectives of the working group were to provide an overview of the epidemiology, physiology, risk factors, and types of hypersensitivity reactions; to synthesize the evidence for pretreatment strategies that minimize the risk of a breakthrough reaction for both iodinated contrast media and gadolinium-based contrast agents; to review the allergy investigations used to evaluate patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction; and to provide an overview of existing guidelines. Following appraisal of the evidence, the working group established recommendations based on consensus in this practice guidance.

Data Mining and Analysis for Iodinated Contrast Media Adverse Event Signals Based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to employ the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to mine and analyze adverse events related to iodinated contrast media (ICM), explore the characteristics of adverse events (AEs) including their occurrence and correlation strength between AEs and drugs, and to provide valuable insights for clinical use.

METHODS

The FAERS database was queried, data from Q1 of 2004 to Q2 of 2023 were extracted, and AE reports targeting 5 ICMs as the primary suspects were collected. Data mining and analysis were carried out on relevant reports using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), while the standardized medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) queries (SMQ) was used for systematic classification.

RESULTS

A total of 11,155,106 AE reports were retrieved from FAERS, with 2,412 for ioversol, 2,001 for iohexol, 987 for iodixanol, 1,154 for iopamidol, and 3,835 for iopromide. ICM-induced AE occurrence targeted 21 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 329 significant disproportionality Preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the 4 algorithms were simultaneously retained. The results revealed that the medium and strong adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals of the 5 ICMs largely focused on "respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders," "general disorders and administration site conditions," "immune system disorders," and "skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders." Ioversol (log2ROR = 1.21, Padj = 0.034) and iopromide (log2ROR = 1.32, Padj = 0.004) were both correlated with a higher incidence of a significant ADR signal, namely throat irritation, particularly in females. In addition, ioversol and iopromide also suggested that toxic nephropathy (log2ROR = -2.47, Padj < 0.001) and hyperhidrosis (log2ROR = -1.22, Padj = 0.001) were significant ADR signals, especially in males, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While the AE distribution of the 5 ICMs was consistent, there were variations in specific ADR signal characteristics, warranting further consideration and exploration.

Diagnostic efficacy of complexity metrics from cardiac MRI myocardial segmental motion curves in detecting late gadolinium enhancement in myocardial infarction patients

Background

Myocardial segmental motion is associated with cardiovascular pathology, often assessed through myocardial strain features. The stability of the motion can be influenced by myocardial fibrosis. This research aimed to explore the complexity metrics (CM) of myocardial segmental motion curves, observe their correlation with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) transmural extension (TE), and assess diagnostic efficacy combined with segmental strains in different TE segments.

Methods

We included 42 myocardial infarction patients, dividing images into 672 myocardial segments (208 remote, 384 viable, and 80 unviable segments based on TE). Radial and circumferential segmental strain, along with CM for motion curves, were extracted. Correlation between CM and LGE, as well as the potential distinguishing role of CM, was evaluated using Pearson correlation, univariate linear regression (F-test), multivariate regression analysis (T-test), area under curve (AUC), machine learning models, and DeLong test.

Results

All CMs showed significant linear correlation with TE (P < 0.001). Six CMs were correlated with TE (r > 0.3), with radial frequency drift (FD) displayed the strongest correlation (r = 0.496, P < 0.001). Radial and circumferential FD significantly differed in higher TE myocardium than in remote segments (P < 0.05). Radial FD had practical diagnostic efficacy (remote vs. unviable AUC = 0.89, viable vs. unviable AUC = 0.77, remote vs. viable AUC = 0.65). Combining CM with segmental strain features boosted diagnostic efficacy than models using only segmental strain features (DeLong test, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The CM of myocardial motion curves has been associated with LGE infarction, and combining CM with strain features improves the diagnosis of different myocardial LGE infarction degrees.

MR Angiography of Pulmonary Vasculature

Pulmonary MR angiography (MRA) is a useful alternative to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for the study of the pulmonary vasculature. For pulmonary hypertension and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return, a cardiac MR imaging and the pulmonary MRA are useful for flow quantification and planning treatment. For the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), MRA-PE has been shown to have non-inferior outcomes at 6 months when compared with CTA-PE. Over the last 15 years, pulmonary MRA has become a routine and reliable examination for the workup of pulmonary hypertension and the primary diagnosis of PE at the University of Wisconsin.

Adverse reactions during procedures: Hypersensitivity to contrast agents and dyes

OBJECTIVE

This review provides an overview of the literature on hypersensitivity reactions during procedures to commonly used contrast agents and dyes. A synthesis of current knowledge on clinical symptoms, epidemiology and risk factors, pathomechanism, and management of hypersensitivity reactions to these substances is presented.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted through Medline. Included were peer-reviewed articles written in English between 2000 and 2019.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Relevant clinical studies, experimental studies, and review articles have been selected. Additionally, case reports have been included if they carried significant information about rare clinical forms of hypersensitivity reactions, disease mechanisms, or therapy.

RESULTS

An allergological workup is only indicated for patients with a history of immediate (IHR) and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions (NIHR) but not for toxic or unrelated adverse events. Skin tests with or without experimental cellular laboratory tests in patients with previous reactions can provide evidence for an allergic mechanism. Positive skin tests indicating allergy are more common in severe reactions. If the adverse event was allergic, skin testing of alternatives is helpful for the selection of other contrast agents for future procedures. Premedication alone may be insufficient in these cases, and breakthrough reactions occur. For nonallergic reactions, change of contrast agent and premedication is often but not always sufficient to suppress reactions.

CONCLUSION

Patients with previous NIHR or IHR, especially moderate and severe IHR, needing potential re-administration of contrast agents should be skin tested to identify an allergic mechanism as well as alternative agents to be used for future procedures.

MRI and CT contrast media extravasation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review combines data from multiple papers on contrast media extravasation to identify factors contributing to increased extravasation risk.

METHODS

Data were extracted from 17 papers reporting 2191 extravasations in 1,104,872 patients (0.2%) undergoing computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Extravasation rates were 0.045% for gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) and nearly 6-fold higher, 0.26% for iodinated contrast agents. Factors associated with increased contrast media extravasations included: older age, female gender, using an existing intravenous (IV) instead of placing a new IV in radiology, in-patient status, use of automated power injection, high injection rates, catheter location, and failing to warm up the more viscous contrast media to body temperature.

CONCLUSION

Contrast media extravasation is infrequent but nearly 6 times less frequent with GBCA for MRI compared with iodinated contrast used in CT.

Immediate Allergic Reactions to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if there are differences in rates of immediate allergic events between classes of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Materials and Methods PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies in which rates of immediate adverse events to GBCAs were reported. The American College of Radiology classification system was used to characterize allergic-like events as mild, moderate, or severe, and the total number of administrations of each GBCA was recorded. Where necessary, authors of studies were contacted to clarify data and eliminate physiologic reactions. Relative risks of GBCA types were estimated by using the Mantel-Haenszel type method. Results Nine studies in which immediate reactions to GBCA were recorded from a total of 716 978 administrations of GBCA met the criteria for inclusion and exclusion. The overall rate of patients who had immediate allergic-like reactions was 9.2 per 10 000 administrations and the overall rate of severe immediate allergic-like reactions was 0.52 per 10 000 administrations.. The nonionic linear chelate gadodiamide had the lowest rate of reactions, at 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 2.4) per 10 000 administrations, which was significantly less than that of linear ionic GBCAs at 8.3 (95% CI: 7.5, 9.2) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 0.19 [95% CI: 0.099, 0.36]; P < .00001) and less than that for nonionic macrocyclic GBCAs at 16 (95% CI: 14, 19) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 0.12 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.31]; P < .001). GBCAs known to be associated with protein binding had a higher rate of reactions, at 17 (95% CI: 15, 20) per 10 000 administrations compared with the same chelate classification without protein binding, at 5.2 (95% CI: 4.5, 6.0) per 10 000 administrations (relative risk, 3.1 [95% CI: 2.4, 3.8]; P < .0001). Conclusion These data show the lowest rate of immediate allergic adverse events with use of the nonionic linear GBCA gadodiamide in comparison with those of ionic linear or nonionic macrocyclic GBCAs. A higher rate of immediate allergic adverse events was associated with ionicity, protein binding, and macrocyclic structure. © RSNA, 2017 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on August 31, 2017.

Gadolinium Deposition and Chronic Toxicity

Clinicians, radiologists, and patients should be aware of the most up-to-date data on the risks of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration. In this review, we discuss in vivo gadolinium retention, particularly brain tissue retention, and potential toxic effects. GBCA pharmacokinetics and biodistribution are reviewed briefly. Based on the more recent published literature and society guidelines, general safety recommendations for clinical practice are provided.