Magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatitis

Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis: a review of current practices and future directions

Acute pancreatitis is a condition marked by inflammation of the pancreas and surrounding tissues. While the majority of cases of acute pancreatitis are mild, a minority of severe cases are the primary contributors to the morbidity and mortality attributed to this condition. Retroperitoneal morphologic changes can be detected by utilization of various imaging modalities, and their accurate evaluation is crucial for effective management. Acute pancreatitis is commonly diagnosed using computed tomography (CT). However, there are certain clinical scenarios where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may have superiority over CT. In particular, MRI is useful in cases where patients cannot receive iodinated CT contrast, or where there is a need to investigate the underlying cause of acute pancreatitis. Additionally, MRI can be utilized to evaluate ductal disconnection and guide interventions for necrotic collections. The unique features of MRI can be particularly useful, including its ability to provide superior contrast resolution and to offer greater functional information through techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging. The aim of this review is to discuss the MRI assessment of individuals with acute pancreatitis. Additionally, the recent advances in MRI for evaluation of acute pancreatitis will also be introduced.

Efficacy and Predictors of Pain Response to Combined Antioxidants in Children with Chronic Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Pain is a major problem in 90% of patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Studies evaluating response to antioxidants (AO) are conflicting and no pediatric studies are available.

AIMS

To evaluate markers of oxidative stress (OS), and efficacy and predictors of response to AO in improving pain in children with CP.

METHODS

Antioxidants were given to CP children for 6 months. Subjects were assessed at baseline and post-therapy for pain and markers of OS [serum thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), superoxide dismutase (S-SOD)] and antioxidant levels [vitamin C, selenium, total antioxidant capacity-ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP)]. Matched healthy controls were assessed for OS and antioxidant levels. Good response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in number of painful days/month.

RESULTS

48 CP children (25 boys, age 13 years) and 14 controls were enrolled. 38/48 cases completed 6 months of therapy. CP cases had higher OS [TBARS (7.8 vs 5.2 nmol/mL; p < 0.001)] and lower antioxidant levels [FRAP (231 vs. 381.3 µmol/L; p = 0.003), vitamin C (0.646 vs. 0.780 mg/dL; p < 0.001)] than controls. Significant reduction in TBARS and S-SOD and increase in FRAP, vitamin C, and selenium occurred after 6 months. 10.5% cases had minor side effects. 26(68%) cases had a good response, with 9(24%) becoming pain-free. Subjects with severe ductal changes had lower median BMI (- 0.73 vs 0.10; p = 0.04) and responded less often than those with mild changes (17/29 vs 9/9; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

CP children have higher OS than healthy controls. Antioxidant therapy is safe. Pain response is seen in 68% cases, less often in patients with severe ductal changes.

Endoscopic Management of Complications in Chronic Pancreatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis is often suboptimal. This review discusses detailed endoscopic approaches for managing complications in CP.

LITERATURE FINDINGS

CP is characterized by progressive and irreversible destruction of pancreatic parenchyma and ductal system resulting in fibrosis, scarring, and loss of glandular function. Abdominal pain remains is the most common symptom of the disease and the main aim of medical, endoscopic, and surgical therapy is to help relieve symptoms, prevent disease progression, and manage complications related to CP. In fact, advances in our understanding of CP have improved medical care and quality of life in these patients. With significant sequela, morbidity and a progressive nature, a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology, natural course, diagnostic approaches, and optimal management strategies for this disease is warranted. The existing modalities and new innovations in this field are safe, effective, and likely to have a positive impact on management of complication in CP whenever used in the right context.

Advances in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs

In the last 20 years, the diagnosis of pancreatitis has become more frequent as a result of improved diagnostic modalities such as abdominal ultrasound examination, advanced imaging, and immunoassays for the measurement of pancreatic lipase. Our aim is to provide a state‐of‐the‐art overview of the clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) in dogs with a particular focus on pancreatic lipase assay validation and clinical performance, in addition to advanced imaging modalities. We also discuss the potential indications for cytology and histopathology in dogs with suspected AP.

Magnetic resonance severity index assessed by T1-weighted imaging for acute pancreatitis: correlation with clinical outcomes and grading of the revised Atlanta classification-a narrative review

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common disease that may involve pancreas and peripancreatic tissues with a prevalence of up to 50 per 100,000 individuals for year. The Atlanta classification was assessed for the first time in 1992 and modified in 2012 in order to describe morphological features of AP and its complications. AP can be morphologically distinguished in two main types: interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) and necrotizing pancreatitis (NEP). This classification is very important because the presence of necrosis is directly linked to local or systemic complications, hospital stays and death. Magnetic resonance (MR) is very useful to characterize morphological features in AP and its abdominal complications. Particularly we would like to underline the diagnostic, staging and prognostic role of T1-weighted images with fat suppression that could be significant to assess many features of the AP inflammatory process and its complications (detection of the pancreatic contour, pancreatic necrosis, presence of haemorrhage). Signs of inflammatory and edema are instead observed by T1-weighted images. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is necessary to study the main pancreatic duct and the extrahepatic biliary tract and contrast-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows to assess the extent of necrosis and vascular injuries.

MRI in acute pancreatitis

Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly performed imaging test for acute pancreatitis. Nevertheless, magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging is useful in many specific situations. These include evaluating patients with acute pancreatitis who cannot receive iodinated CT contrast, elucidating the underlying cause of acute pancreatitis, assessing ductal disconnection and for guiding intervention of necrotic collections. Non-contrast MRI is superior to non-contrast CT and MRI for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. We discuss these specific uses of MRI in acute pancreatitis. We highlight the future advances in MRI including faster, free-breathing scans that allow MRI to be completed within 10 min.

Pancreatitis and PDAC: association and differentiation

The discrimination of mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a central diagnostic dilemma. It is important to differentiate these entities since they have markedly different prognoses and management. Importantly, the appearance of these two entities significantly overlaps on a variety of imaging modalities. However, there are imaging features that may be suggestive of one entity more than the other. MFCP and PDAC may show different enhancement patterns on perfusion computed tomography (CT) and/or dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). The duct-penetrating sign on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is more often associated with MFCP, whereas abrupt cutoff with upstream dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and the double-duct sign (obstruction/cutoff of both the common bile duct and pancreatic duct) are more often associated with PDAC. Nevertheless, tissue sampling is the most reliable method to differentiate between these entities and is currently generally necessary for management.

Patient respiratory-triggered quantitative T2 mapping in the pancreas

Background

Long acquisition times and motion sensitivity limit T₂ mapping in the abdomen. Accelerated mapping at 3 T may allow for quantitative assessment of diffuse pancreatic disease in patients during free‐breathing.

Purpose

To test the feasibility of respiratory‐triggered quantitative T₂ analysis in the pancreas and correlate T₂‐values with age, body mass index, pancreatic location, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and underlying pathology.

Study Type

Retrospective single‐center pilot study.

Population

Eighty‐eight adults.

Field Strength/Sequence

Ten‐fold accelerated multiecho‐spin‐echo 3 T MRI sequence to quantify T₂ at 3 T.

Assessment

Two radiologists independently delineated three regions of interest inside the pancreatic head, body, and tail for each acquisition. Means and standard deviations for T₂ values in these regions were determined. T₂‐value variation with demographic data, intraparenchymal location, pancreatic duct dilation, and underlying pancreatic disease was assessed.

Statistical Tests

Interreader reliability was determined by calculating the interclass coefficient (ICCs). T₂ values were compared for different pancreatic locations by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Interpatient associations between T₂ values and demographical, clinical, and radiological data were calculated (ANOVA).

Results

The accelerated T₂ mapping sequence was successfully performed in all participants (mean acquisition time, 2:48 ± 0:43 min). Low T₂ value variability was observed across all patients (intersubject) (head: 60.2 ± 8.3 msec, body: 63.9 ± 11.5 msec, tail: 66.8 ± 16.4 msec). Interreader agreement was good (ICC, 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.86). T₂‐values differed significantly depending on age (P < 0.001), location (P < 0.001), main pancreatic duct dilatation (P < 0.001), and diffuse pancreatic disease (P < 0.03).

Data Conclusion

The feasibility of accelerated T₂ mapping at 3 T in moving abdominal organs was demonstrated in the pancreas, since T₂ values were stable and reproducible. In the pancreatic parenchyma, T₂‐values were significantly dependent on demographic and clinical parameters.

Level of Evidence: 4

Technical Efficacy: Stage 1

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:410–416.

Clinical profile and treatment outcome of chronic pancreatitis in children: a long-term follow-up study of 156 cases

AIM

There is a paucity of literature in pediatric chronic pancreatitis (CP) and most information is derived from adult literature. We, therefore, analyzed our experience of CP to look for clinical profile and long-term outcome.

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2015, 156 consecutive children (≤18 years) diagnosed as CP were included. Their clinical profile, management, and follow-up data were retrieved. Genetic markers (PRSS1, SPINK1, and CFTR) were studied in 40 idiopathic cases.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 13 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 10-14] years (93 males) and 134 (86%) were idiopathic. Genetic mutations were found in 22/40 (55%) idiopathic cases. All but two presented with pain abdomen (episodic pain in 93.6%) and symptom duration was 12 (IQR: 6-24) months. There were two subsets; calcific (CCP) 68 (43.5%) and non-calcific (NCCP) 88 (56.5%). In CCP group, significantly more children had Cambridge grade 5 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography changes, low weight Z-score, and had continuous pain more compared to NCCP group. Over a median follow-up of 23 (IQR: 8-45.5) months, more children in CCP group had complications. Endoscopic therapy (done for persistent pain in 40) relieved pain in 52.5% of cases while medical therapy did so in 36% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric CP in Asia presents with episodic pain and genetic predisposition seems to be a major cause. There are two subsets; CCP and NCCP with former showing marked imaging changes, more often associated with malnutrition and complications. Endoscopic therapy for pain relief gives modest benefit but medical therapy is not encouraging.

Is acute recurrent pancreatitis in children a precursor of chronic pancreatitis? A long-term follow-up study of 93 cases

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In view of paucity of literature we analyzed our experience of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) to study clinical profile and long-term outcome.

METHODS

Over 13 years, 93 consecutive children (≤18 years) diagnosed to have ARP were included in this study. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was done at baseline and on follow-up. Common mutations for serine-protease-inhibitor (SPINK1 N34S), protease inhibitor (PRSS1 R122S) and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR deltaF508, 5T) were studied in 22 idiopathic cases.

RESULTS

The median age of the children with ARP was 13 (10-14.5) years, 53 were males. Etiology included biliary in 14 (15%), pancreas divisum in 6 (7%), others in 3 (3.5%) and idiopathic in the remaining 70 (75%). SPINK1 mutation was found in 10/22 (45%) cases. Over a median follow-up of 25.5 (8.25-48) months, 37 (42%) of 88 (5 lost to follow-up) developed chronic pancreatitis (CP). On multivariate analysis idiopathic etiology (p<0.03), presence of SPINK1 mutation (p=0.01), longer follow-up (p<0.001) were associated with progression to CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliopancreatic structural/obstructive causes should always be looked for. It seems ARP is a precursor of CP and progression is associated with idiopathic etiology and presence of genetic mutations. Hence, patients with ARP should be kept on regular follow-up to detect CP.

Pancreatic hardness: Correlation of surgeon’s palpation, durometer measurement and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features

AIM

To evaluate the correlation between subjective assessments of pancreatic hardness based on the palpation, objective measurements using a durometer, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings for assessing pancreatic hardness.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients undergoing pancreatectomies were enrolled. An experienced surgeon subjectively evaluated the pancreatic hardness in the surgical field by palpation. The pancreatic hardness was also objectively evaluated using a durometer. Preoperative MRI findings were evaluated by a radiologist in terms of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, the relative signal intensity decrease (RSID) of the pancreatic parenchyma, and the diameter of the pancreatic parenchyma and duct. Durometer measurement results, ADC values, RSID, pancreatic duct and parenchyma diameters, and the ratio of the diameters of the duct and parenchyma were compared between pancreases judged to be soft or hard pancreas on the palpation. A correlation analysis was also performed between the durometer and MRI measurements.

RESULTS

The palpation assessment classified 44 patients as having a soft pancreas and 39 patients as having a hard pancreas. ADC values were significantly lower in the hard pancreas group. The ductal diameter and duct-to-pancreas ratio were significantly higher in the hard pancreas group. For durometer measurements, a correlation analysis showed a positive correlation with the ductal diameter and the duct-to-pancreas ratio and a negative correlation with ADC values.

CONCLUSION

Hard pancreases showed lower ADC values, a wider pancreatic duct diameter and a higher duct-to-pancreas ratio than soft pancreases. Additionally, the ADC values, diameter of the pancreatic duct and duct-to-pancreas ratio were closely correlated with the durometer results.

Computed Tomography and MRI of the Hepatobiliary System and Pancreas

MRI and computed tomographic (CT) imaging are becoming more common in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders in small animals. With the advent of multislice CT scanners, sedated examinations in veterinary patients are feasible increasing the use of this imaging modality. CT and MRI provide additional information for dogs and cats with hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases because of lack of superimposition of structures, operator dependence, and through intravenous contrast administration. This added value provides more information for diagnosis, prognosis, and surgical planning.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the normal mesostenium and involvement of the mesostenium in acute pancreatitis

The main point of this paper is to study MRI findings of the normal mesostenium and the involvement of the mesostenium in acute pancreatitis and to discuss the relationship between the involvement of the mesostenium and the severity of acute pancreatitis. In clinical practice, the mesenterical involvement in acute pancreatitis was often observed on MRI in daily works, which was little recorded in the reported studies. We conducted the current study to assess the mesenterical involvement in acute pancreatitis with MRI. We found that the mesenterical involvement of acute pancreatitis patients is common on MRI. The mesenterical involvement has a positive correlation with the MR severity index and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healthy Evaluation II scoring system. It has been shown that MR can be used to visualize mesenterical involvement, which is a supplementary indicator in evaluating the severity of acute pancreatitis and local and systemic complications.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance (MR) findings in the Italian experience

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are currently the most frequently performed imaging modalities for the study of pancreatic disease. In cases of suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a dynamic quadriphasic (precontrast, contrast-enhanced pancreatic, venous and late phases) study is recommended in both techniques. In the diffuse form of autoimmune pancreatitis (DAIP), the pancreatic parenchyma shows diffuse enlargement and appears, during the MDCT and MR contrast-enhanced pancreatic phase, diffusely hypodense and hypointense, respectively, compared to the spleen because of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration and pancreatic fibrosis. During the venous phase of MDCT and MR imaging, the parenchyma appears hyperdense and hyperintense, respectively, in comparison to the pancreatic phase. In the delayed phase of both imaging modalities, it shows retention of contrast media. A "capsule-like rim" may be recognised as a peripancreatic MDCT hyperdense and MR hypointense halo in the T2-weighted images, compared to the parenchyma. DAIP must be differentiated from non-necrotizing acute pancreatitis (NNAP) and lymphoma since both diseases show diffuse enlargement of the pancreatic parenchyma. The differential diagnosis is clinically difficult, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT has an important role. In the focal form of autoimmune pancreatitis (FAIP), the parenchyma shows segmental enlargement involving the head, the body-tail or the tail, with the same contrast pattern as the diffuse form on both modalities. FAIP needs to be differentiated from pancreatic adenocarcinoma to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures, since both diseases have similar clinical and imaging presentation. The differential diagnosis is clinically difficult, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MDCT and MR imaging both have an important role. MR cholangiopancreatography helps in the differential diagnosis. Furthermore, MDCT and MR imaging can identify the extrapancreatic manifestations of AIP, most commonly biliary, renal and retroperitoneal. Finally, in all cases of uncertain diagnosis, MDCT and/or MR follow-up after short-term treatment (2-3 weeks) with high-dose steroids can identify a significant reduction in size of the pancreatic parenchyma and, in FAIP, normalisation of the calibre of the upstream main pancreatic duct.

Clinical application of 3D VIBECAIPI-DIXON for non-enhanced imaging of the pancreas compared to a standard 2D fat-saturated FLASH

PURPOSE

To compare a fast 3D VIBE sequence with Dixon fat saturation and CAIPIRINHA acceleration techniques (3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON)) to a standard 2D FLASH sequence with spectral fat saturation and conventional GRAPPA acceleration technique (2D Flash(GRAPPA-fs)) for non-enhanced imaging of the pancreas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved intra-individual comparison study, 29 patients (7 female, 22 male; mean age 60.4 ± 20.9 years) examined on a 48-channel 3.0-T MR system (MAGNETOM Skyra VD 13, Siemens Healthcare Sector, Germany) were included. 3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) (TR/TE-3.95/2.5+1.27 ms; spatial resolution-1.2 × 1.2 × 3.0 mm(3); CAIPIRINHA 2 × 2 [1], acquisition time-0:12 min) and 2D Flash(GRAPPA-fs) (TR/TE-195/3.69 ms; 1.2 × 1.2 × 3.0 mm(3); GRAPPA 2, 3 × 0:21 min) sequences were performed in each subject in random order prior to the administration of an intravenous contrast agent. Two radiologists evaluated the images with regard to diagnostic preference. Semi-quantitative signal ratios were calculated for the pancreas versus the liver, spleen, muscle, and visceral fat. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using unweighted Cohen's kappa. Signal ratio results were analyzed using a univariate analysis of variance. Additional signal-to-noise (SNR) measurements were performed in a phantom.

RESULTS

3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) was preferred in 72.4% (both readers) and 2D Flash(GRAPPA-fs) in 3.4%/6.9% (reader 1/2) of cases with a kappa value of 0.756. The main reasons for this preference were homogenous fat saturation with 3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) and reduced motion artifacts due to a faster acquisition, leading to improved delineation of the pancreas. Signal ratios of pancreatic to fat signal for 3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) (10.08 ± 3.48) and 2D Flash(GRAPPA-fs) (6.53 ± 3.07) were statistically different (P<.001). However, no additional statistically significant differences in signal ratios were identified (range: 0.73 ± 0.18 to 1.37 ± 0.40; .514<P<.961). SNR did not statistically significantly differ between the sequences.

CONCLUSION

3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) enables robust pancreatic imaging with a shorter time and improved fat suppression relative to conventional 2D Flash(GRAPPA-fs). At an acquisition time of 12 seconds, 3D VIBE(CAIPI-DIXON) can be obtained in considerably less time than standard fat-saturated VIBE sequences.

Quantification of pancreatic exocrine function of chronic pancreatitis with secretin-enhanced MRCP

AIM: To obtain reference values for pancreatic flow output rate (PFR) and peak time (PT) in healthy volunteers and chronic pancreatitis (CP); to correlate quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) of pancreatic fluid output following secretin with fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) tests.

METHODS: The present study includes 53 subjects comprised of 17 healthy individuals and 36 patients with CP from April 2011 to January 2013. The 36 patients with CP were divided into three groups of mild CP (n = 14), moderate CP (n = 19) and advanced CP (n = 3) by M-ANNHEIM classification for CP.. Fifty-three cases underwent FE-1 test and magnetic resonance imaging using 3.0 T-device (Signa EXCITE, GE Healthcare). Coronal T₂-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo, spiratory triggered, covering the papillae, duodenum and small bowel. MRCP was performed with a heavily T₂-weighted fat-suppressed long TE HASTE sequence (thick slab 2D MRCP sequence), repeated every 2 min up to 11 min after 0.1 mL/kg secretin injection (Secrelux, Sanochemia^®, Germany). FE-1 test used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test (ScheBo. Tech^®, Germany).

RESULTS: A good linear correlation showed between the calculated volume and the actual volume by Phantom experiments. Fifty-three paired Quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCPQ) and FE-1 data sets were analyzed. The mean FE-1 of 53 cases was 525.41 ± 94.44 μg/g for 17 healthy volunteers, 464.95 ± 136.13 μg/g for mild CP, 301.55 ± 181.55 μg/g for moderate CP, 229.30 ± 146.60 μg/g for advanced CP. Also, there was statistically significant difference in FE-1 (P = 0.0001) between health and CP. The mean values of PFR and PT were 8.18 ± 1.11 mL/min, 5.76 ± 1.71 min for normal; 7.27 ± 2.04 mL/min, 7.71 ± 2.55 min for mild CP; 4.98 ± 2.57 mL/min, 9.10 ± 3.00 min for moderate CP; 4.13 ± 1.83 mL/min, 12.33 ± 1.55 min for advanced CP. Further, statistically significant difference in PFR (P = 0.0001) and PT (P = 0.0001) was observed between health and CP. Besides, there was correlation (r = 0.79) and consistency (K = 0.6) between MRCPQ and ELISA Test. It was related between M-ANNHEIM classification and PFR (r = 0.55), FE-1 (r = 0.57).

CONCLUSION: SMRCP can provide a safe, non-invasive and efficient method to evaluate the exocrine function of the pancreas.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography findings in cats with cholangitis and pancreatitis

Cholangiohepatitis/cholangitis is second only to hepatic lipidosis as the most common liver disease in cats and is often associated with concurrent pancreatitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have developed into an accurate, highly sensitive and specific imaging tool for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct disorders in humans. In this prospective case series, 10 cats with suspected cholangitis and/or pancreatitis were enrolled based on clinical history, physical examination and appropriate diagnostic test results. MRI and MRCP sequences with secretin stimulation of the cranial abdomen were performed, and sonography and laparoscopic biopsies for histologic diagnosis were obtained for comparison. MRI detected pancreatic abnormalities in cats suspected of pancreatitis, including T1 pre-contrast hypointense and T2 hyperintense pancreatic parenchyma and a dilated pancreatic duct. The MRI findings of the liver were non-specific. Nine of 10 cats had biliary abnormalities, including gall bladder wall thickening, gall bladder wall moderate contrast enhancement and/or gall bladder debris. Eight of 10 cats had histologic evidence of pancreatitis, as well as hepatitis or cholangitis, with one cat diagnosed with hepatic lymphoma. The advantages of MRI/MRCP over sonography of these cats included the striking pancreatic signal changes associated with pancreatitis and the ability to comprehensibly assess and measure the pancreas and hepatobiliary structures without operator dependence or interference from bowel gas. MRI/MRCP imaging of the feline abdomen may be beneficial in cases with equivocal ultrasound imaging findings.

MRI of the pancreas: problem solving tool

Advances in MR hardware and pulse sequence design over the years have improved the quality and robustness of MR imaging of the pancreas. Today, MRI is an indispensible tool for studying the pancreas and can provide useful information not attainable with other noninvasive or minimally invasive imaging techniques. In the present review, specific cases are reviewed where the strengths of MRI demonstrate the utility of this imaging modality as a problem solving tool.

Magnetic resonance imaging for acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is characterized by acute chemical injury of the pancreatic parenchyma and peripancreatic tissue. The increased frequency of death in acute pancreatitis is directly correlated with the degree and progress of pancreatic necrosis. Moreover, the occurrence of some local complications in acute pancreatitis, such as pancreatic hemorrhage, peripancreatic abscess or large pseudocyst, and pseudoaneurysm, could influence the choice of treatment for these patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to help evaluate the presence and degree of pancreatic necrosis, and is crucial for identifying complications of acute pancreatitis and predicting prognosis. The purpose of this article is to describe MRI techniques for acute pancreatitis, to review the spectrum of pancreatic and peripancreatic patterns, as well as to survey various complications secondary to acute pancreatitis on MRI. The role of MRI in the initial evaluation and staging of acute pancreatitis is emphasized.

Pancreatic duct changes are not associated with early signs of chronic pancreatitis at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVE

The association between chronic pancreatitis (CP) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) has been reported previously. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the presence of early pancreatic abnormalities and duct changes, using MRCP/MRI in PSC and to evaluate possible risk factors for these changes and their clinical importance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and three patients with PSC were identified among all MRI liver/pancreas referrals in 2001-2005. MRCP was used to grade pancreatic duct changes in three groups: grade 0 (normal), grade 1 (mild) and grade 2 (severe). For detection of early MRI signs of CP, the pancreas-spleen signal intensity ratio (SIR), the arterial and early venous phase ratio (A/PV ratio) and the age-related size of the pancreas were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pancreatic duct changes were found in 24% of the PSC patients. The pancreatic duct changes were associated with extrahepatic biliary involvement and long duration of PSC but not associated with pancreas-spleen SIR, A/PV ratio, pancreas size, previous post-ERCP or acute pancreatitis. Severe pancreatic duct changes were significantly associated to abdominal pain. Clinically significant CP was seen in one PSC patient (1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic duct changes are associated with extrahepatic bile duct strictures and not with the early MRI signs of CP. Therefore, pancreatic duct changes seem to be part of the spectrum of PSC and should not be defined as CP. Pancreatic duct changes are of limited clinical importance but may contribute to abdominal pain in PSC.

Advanced imaging of chronic pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis is characterized by continuing inflammation, destruction, and irreversible morphological changes in the pancreatic parenchyma and ductal anatomy. These changes lead to chronic pain and/or loss of function. Although these definitions are simple, the clinical diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis remains difficult to make, especially for early disease. Routine imaging modalities such as transabdominal ultrasound and standard CT scans are insensitive for depicting early disease, and detect only advanced chronic pancreatitis. Advances in imaging modalities including CT, MRI with gadolinium contrast enhancement, MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP), MRI/MRCP with secretin-stimulation (S-MRCP), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allow earlier diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. This article reviews the recognized findings, advantages, and disadvantages of the various imaging modalities in the management of chronic pancreatitis, specifically CT, MRI with or without MRCP and/or S-MRCP, ERCP, and EUS.