Fistula after 2-flap palatoplasty: a 20-year review

Appropriate Characteristics for Cleft Palate Surgery by Chief Residency in Plastic Surgery Training Programs

Background

Cleft palate repair is a challenge for residency training programs due to the small cavity, limited access, and delicate tissue handling, which can lead to complications such as oronasal fistula (ONF) in inexperienced surgeons. Practical hands-on experience is essential for training programs.

Methods

The retrospective study included 186 patients who underwent primary palatoplasty between January 2012 and December 2021. Chief residents performed the procedures under the supervision of surgeons. The analysis aimed to determine the suitable criteria for conducting cleft palate surgery, focusing on the chief residency of a plastic surgery training program.

Results

In all cases in this series, using the 2-flap palatoplasty technique resulted in an observed postoperative ONF rate of 22.04%. The study demonstrated that a cleft width exceeding 11.5 mm increased the likelihood of ONF by 5.23 times (P = 0.001). Furthermore, the implementation of preoperative nasoalveolar molding and buccal fat flaps was associated with a reduced risk of ONF (odds ratios = 0.34, 0.06, P = 0.035, 0.006). Notably, variables such as age at surgery, sex, Veau type, and the side of the cleft palate were nonsignificant predictors of ONF following palatoplasty.

Conclusions

Procedural practice on actual patients remains vital for training competent plastic surgeons. However, we must strike a balance between the surgical benefits and postoperative risks. Appropriate case selection is crucial, as demonstrated in our study on patients with cleft palates.

Evaluation of the use of an advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF+) membrane in children undergoing primary palatoplasty-- a prospective randomized clinical pilot-study

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an A-PRF + membrane can lower the fistula rate in patients undergoing primary palatoplasty. A total of 20 children were included: 10 were randomized and included in the platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) group, and 10 were assigned to the control group. Before two-flap palatoplasty was performed, the cleft's width was measured. The patients in the PRF group underwent an intraoperative collection of 5 ml venous blood, which was centrifugated and pressed onto an A-PRF + membrane. Subsequently, the membrane was placed between the oral and nasal mucosal layers. The control group underwent the same procedure without the addition of A-PRF+. The need for transfusions or postoperative intensive care was registered. All children were followed up at 10 days, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and after more than 6 months and the occurrence of fistulae and need for a second palatal operation was then evaluated. After more than six months postoperatively, only two fistulae (10%) remained and had to undergo secondary palatoplasty (p = 1.00). Moreover, the blood transfusion rate did not differ significantly (p = 1.00). A-PRF + might be beneficial in cleft closure, but further randomized studies with larger patient cohort are needed.

Addition of a Buccinator Musculomucosal Flap Improves Surgical Outcomes of Conventional two-Flap Palatoplasty: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE

The surgical outcomes of novel two-flap palatoplasty adding a buccinator musculomucosal flap were compared with those of conventional two-flap palatoplasty to clarify the effects of lengthening the nasal mucosa of the soft palate using a BMMF in cleft lip and palate or cleft palate cases.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative study.

SETTING

Tertiary, cleft team.

PATIENTS

Non-syndromic patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair using two-flap palatoplasty with BMMF (BMMF group) or conventional two-flap palatoplasty (non-BMMF group).

INTERVENTIONS

Palatoplasty between January 2012 and March 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Perceptual Japanese speech evaluation, rate of an indication for additional speech surgery (AS), rate of incidence of oronasal fistula (IF) including spontaneously closing fistula, and rate of occurrence of oronasal fistula (OF) present for more than 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 92 analyzed patients, 70 received two-flap palatoplasty with BMMF and 22 received two-flap palatoplasty. In the BMMF and non-BMMF groups, the respective percentage of hypernasality (no, mild) was 91.4% and 77.2%, no nasal emission was 71.4% and 63.6%, velopharyngeal function (competent, borderline competent) was 83.7% and 77.4%, intelligibility (very good, good) was 93.7% and 86.4%, AS was 1.4% and 13.6%, IF was 7.1% and 36.4%, and OF was 1.4% and 9.1%. Significant improvements were observed for AS (p  =  0.0412) and IF (p  =  0.00195) in the BMMF group, with no recorded major adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Adding a BMMF on the nasal side of the soft palate to conventional two-flap palatoplasty significantly improved postoperative outcomes. This approach may therefore be a good option for cleft palate treatment.

The Effect of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding on Oronasal Fistula Following Primary Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Presurgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM) is widely used in cleft care protocol. This study investigated the correlation between PNAM and oronasal fistula after primary palatoplasty.

METHODS

A case-controlled study of 80 unilateral and bilateral complete cleft palate patients who underwent cleft palate repair were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) no PNAM use and (2) PNAM use. The incidence of oronasal fistula and postoperative complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Forty patients in each group demonstrated the same baseline characteristics. The PNAM group showed a significantly lower postoperative oronasal fistula rate (15% versus 50%, P =0.003). Palatal cleft width wider than 12.5 mm increases the odds ratio of fistula formation by 1.19-fold ( P =0.037), and the PNAM protected against postoperative palatal fistula formation (odds ratio 0.20, P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Presurgical nasoalveolar molding can reduce postoperative oronasal fistula in wide-gap Veau type III and IV cleft palate.

Anatomical Study of Domain Rescue of Palatal Length in Patients With a Wide Cleft Palate: Buccal Flap Reconstruction in Primary Palatoplasty

BACKGROUND

This study characterizes the potential loss of velar length in patients with a wide cleft and rescue of this loss of domain by local flap reconstruction, providing anatomic evidence in support of primary lengthening of the soft palate during palatoplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with a cleft palate at least 10mm in width, who underwent primary palatoplasty with a buccal flap prior to 18 months of age over a 2-year period. All patients underwent primary palatoplasty with horizontal transection of the nasal mucosa, which was performed after nasal mucosa repair, but prior to muscular reconstruction. The resulting palatal lengthening was measured and the mucosal defect was reconstructed with a buccal flap.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients included, 3 (13.6%) had a history of Pierre Robin sequence, and 5 (22.7%) had an associated syndrome. No patients had a Veau I cleft, 7 (31.8%) had a Veau II, 12 (54.5%) had a Veau III, and 3 had (13.6%) a Veau IV cleft. All patients had a right buccal flap during primary palatoplasty. The mean cleft width at the posterior nasal spine was 10.6  ±  2.82mm, and mean lengthening of the velum after horizontal transection of the nasal mucosa closure was 10.5  ±  2.23mm. There were 2 (9.1%) fistulas, 1 (4.5%) wound dehiscence, 1 (4.5%) 30-day readmission, and no bleeding complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a wide cleft palate have a potential loss of 1cm velar length. The buccal flap can rescue the loss of domain in palatal length, and potentially improve palatal excursion.

Buccal Fat Pad: Adjunctive Procedure for Lateral Defect Coverage following Primary Palatoplasty

BACKGROUND

The buccal fat flap is an encapsulated mass originating from a specific fat tissue that is easily accessed and richly vascularized. The aim of this study was to report the effect of using the buccal fat flap on the oronasal fistula rate in primary palatoplasty.

METHODS

A case-controlled study of 94 patients who underwent primary cleft palate repair. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) two-flap palatoplasty with buccal fat flap for coverage of lateral hard palate defect and (2) conventional two-flap palatoplasty. The incidence of oronasal fistula and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of oronasal fistula development.

RESULT

Forty-seven patients in each group demonstrated the same baseline characteristics. The buccal fat group showed a significant lower postoperative oronasal fistula rate (2.13 percent versus 21.28 percent, p = 0.008) and smaller fistula size (2 mm versus 4 mm, p = 0.049). A cleft width wider than 11.5 mm increased the odds ratio of fistula formation by 8.44-fold (p = 0.047), and the use of buccal fat protected against postoperative palatal fistula formation (OR, 0.08, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

The use of buccal fat flaps for lateral hard palatal defect coverage in primary palatoplasty can reduce the rate of postoperative palatal fistula, especially in cases of wide palatal cleft.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Square-root Palatoplasty: Comparing a Novel Modified-Furlow Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty Technique to Traditional Straight-line Repair

The purpose of this study was to introduce a modification of the Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty (DOZ)-the square-root palatoplasty (SRP)-and critically evaluate outcomes compared to children who underwent straight-line repair (SLR).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of all nonsyndromic children undergoing primary cleft palate closure either by SRP or SLR at our institution between 2009 and 2017. Outcomes of interest included rates/location of oronasal fistula, secondary surgery, speech delay/deficits, resonance, nasal air emission (NAE), articulation errors, and velopharyngeal function. Logistic regression was used to assess for the effect of surgery type on outcomes while controlling for Veau cleft type, age, and gender.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were included; 46 (59%) underwent SRP, and 32 (41%) underwent SLR. The mean follow-up was 4.07 years. When compared to SLR, children who underwent SRP were less likely to have oronasal fistula [odds ratio (OR) 4.8, P = 0.0159], speech delay/deficits (OR 7.7, P < 0.001), NAE (OR 9.7, P < 0.001), articulation errors (OR 10.2, P < 0.001), or need for secondary speech surgery (OR 13.2, P < 0.0002). Patients who underwent SRP were also more likely to have normal resonance (78.26% versus 43.75%, respectively; P = 0.0043) and good VP function (84.78% versus 56.25%, respectively; P = 0.0094).

Conclusions

This study describes and evaluates outcomes following a modified-Furlow DOZ technique-the SRP. After adjusting for Veau classification, age, and gender in nonsyndromic children, SRP is associated with significantly less speech delay/deficits, NAE, articulation errors, and need for secondary speech surgery when compared to children who underwent SLR.

Risk Factors of Fistula Following Primary Palatoplasty

BACKGROUND

Oronasal fistula (ONF) is a common complication following cleft palate surgery. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ONF and the factors that influence development of ONF following primary palatoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 234 patients undergoing primary palatoplasty during 2012 to 2016 included in this cross-sectional study. Patient demographics, surgeon's experience, age at the time of primary palatoplasty, cleft type by Veau classification, cleft width, and operative technique were recorded. The prevalence of fistulae was the primary outcome. Association of age at the time of repair, cleft type, cleft associated with syndromes, cleft width, and surgeon's experience with fistula rate were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 234 consecutive patients (128 boys [54.7%] and 106 girls [45.3%]). The mean age at primary palatoplasty was 13 months. Oronasal fistulae occurred in 61 (26.07%) patients. There was a statistically significant association between postoperative oronasal fistulae and the following independent variables: Veau classification (adjusted odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45-3.1, P < 0.01), cleft associated with syndromes (adjusted odds ratio 4.76; 95% CI = 1.48-15.2, P < 0.01) and cleft width more than 11.5 mm (adjusted odds ratio 1.96; 95% CI = 1.00-3.85, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The overall number of fistulae was moderate in patients who had undergone primary palatoplasty in our center. Cleft severity as defined by the Veau classification, cleft width, and cleft associated with syndromes were predictive factors for development of postoperative fistulae.

Administration of Single-Dose Antibiotic Does Not Decrease Oronasal Fistula Rates After Primary Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Oronasal fistula (ONF) is a known complication after primary palatoplasty (PP). Studies investigating the effect of perioperative antibiotics on fistula rates after PP are limited by inadequate sample size or reliance on self-reporting through national databases. In this study, the authors evaluated the association between single-dose perioperative antibiotics and postoperative fistula rates after PP at a single institution.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Children younger than 2 years who underwent PP from April 2009 to September 2019 were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were divided into 2 categories: Group 1 received a single intraoperative dose of IV antibiotic, while group 2 did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Outcome measures included ONF formation, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rates. Multivariable firth logistic regression, quantile regression, and χ² tests were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 424 patients, 215 and 209 patients were in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The overall ONF rate was 1.9% among all patients. Patients in group 1 experienced an ONF rate of 3.3%, while patients in group 2 had an ONF rate of 0.5%. After correcting for confounding variables, the difference in ONF rates was not statistically different (P = .68). Median LOS was 35.7 hours and 35.5 hours (P = .17), while the rate of readmission within 30 days was 4.7% and 2.4% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = .96).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of a single-dose perioperative antibiotic did not decrease fistula formation after PP, nor did it affect the patient's LOS or 30-day readmission rate.

Cleft Palate Repair by Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons: Risk Factors for Postoperative Fistula

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To assess the incidence of palatal fistula after primary repair of the cleft palate among two cohorts of Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons and to identify patient and surgeon characteristics that may predict fistula development.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series with chart review.

METHODS

Children who underwent primary repair of cleft palate at one of two multidisciplinary cleft centers over a 10 year period were identified. Charts were reviewed for the presence of palatal fistula; chi square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine variables associated with fistula formation.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2017, 477 patients underwent primary repair of cleft palate by one of 6 Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons. Twenty-four children had incomplete charts, allowing 453 patients to be included in the final analysis. The pooled mean incidence of palatal fistula was 6.6% (P = .525) and varied significantly by cleft type. Logistic regression analysis controlling for multiple variables, showed that Veau IV classification had the highest risk of fistula (OR = 10.582; P = .004). Repair by a specific surgeon was not a significant risk factor for fistula development (P > .07 for each surgeon).

CONCLUSIONS

Among six Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons with fellowship training in cleft palate repair postoperative fistula rates were consistent and compared favorably to standards in the Cleft and Craniofacial surgery literature established by other surgical specialties. Consistent with larger database studies involving multiple surgical specialties, Veau IV classification was the strongest predictor of palatal fistula development, even after adjusting for multiple variables, including differing levels of experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:1281-1285, 2021.

Analysis of the Intrinsic Predictors of Oronasal Fistula in Primary Cleft Palate Repair Using Intravelar Veloplasty

Introduction:

The purpose of the present study was to investigate various factors of cleft palate and to analyze their effect on fistula occurrence following palatal muscle repair using intravelar veloplasty.

Methods:

A retrospective review of patients who underwent palatoplasty was performed. Primary palatoplasty was performed by a single surgeon in a single center. A total of 165 patients who underwent palatoplasty were enrolled. Primary palatoplasty with levator veli palatini muscle repair using intravelar veloplasty was performed. Three extrinsic factors (age, gender, and body weight) and 6 intrinsic factors (cleft width, ratio of cleft width to intermaxillary tuberosity distance, cleft anterior margin shape, uvula position, cleft lip, and radical intravelar veloplasty) were analyzed.

Results:

Palatal fistula occurred in 11 (6.67%) patients. The occurrence of fistula was significantly correlated with a specific Veau classification, that is, type II ( P = .041). Fistula tended to occur more frequently with a wide cleft palate ( P = .063), and the high-risk cutoff value of the width was 7.75 mm.

Conclusions:

A larger cleft width tended to increase the occurrence of fistula. Close observation and information about the higher risk of fistula formation should be given to patients with a large cleft width who underwent intravelar veloplasty.

Influence of Infant Cleft Dimensions on Velopharyngeal Function in 5-Year-Old Danish Children Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Aim:

To examine the association of cleft severity at infancy and velopharyngeal competence in preschool children with unilateral cleft lip and palate operated with early or delayed hard palate repair.

Design:

Subgroup analysis within a multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery (Scandcleft).

Setting:

Tertiary health care. One surgical center.

Patients and Methods:

One hundred twenty-five infants received cheilo-rhinoplasty and soft palate repair at age 3 to 4 months and were randomized to hard palate closure at age 12 or 36 months. Cleft size and cleft morphology were measured 3 dimensionally on digital models, obtained by laser surface scanning of preoperative plaster models (mean age: 1.8 months).

Main outcome measurements:

Velopharyngeal competence (VPC) and hypernasality assessed from a naming test (VPC-Sum) and connected speech (VPC-Rate). In both scales, higher scores indicated a more severe velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Results:

No difference between surgical groups was shown. A low positive correlation was found between posterior cleft width and VPC-Rate (Spearman = .23; P = .025). The role of the covariate “cleft size at tuberosity level” was confirmed in an ordinal logistic regression model (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.35). A low negative correlation was shown between anteroposterior palatal length and VPC-Sum (Spearman = −.27; P = .004) and confirmed by the pooled scores VPC-Pooled (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98) and VPC-Dichotomic (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99).

Conclusions:

Posterior cleft dimensions can be a modest indicator for the prognosis of velopharyngeal function at age 5 years, when the soft palate is closed first, independently on the timing of hard palate repair. Antero-posterior palatal length seems to protect from velopharyngeal insufficiency and hypernasality. However, the association found was significant but low.

On the Frequency of Oronasal Fistulation After Primary Cleft Palate Repair

Objective:

The aims of the study were to assess the postoperative oronasal fistula rate after 1-stage and 2-stage cleft palate repair and identify risk factors associated with its development.

Design:

Systematic review.

Setting:

Various primary cleft and craniofacial centers in the world.

Patients, Participants:

Syndromic and nonsyndromic cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients who had undergone primary cleft palate surgery.

Intervention:

Assessment of oronasal fistula frequency and correlation with staging, timing, and technique of repair, gender, and Veau type. The results obtained in this systematic review were compared with those in previous reports.

Outcome:

The main outcome is represented by the occurrence of the oronasal fistula after 1-stage versus 2-stage palatoplasty.

Results:

The mean fistula percentage was 9.94%. In the Veau I, II, III, and IV groups, the respective fistula rates were 2%, 7.3%, 8.3%, and 12.5%. Oronasal fistula locations based on the Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System were soft palate (type II), 16.2%; soft palate–hard palate junction (type III), 29.3%; and hard palate (type IV), 37.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between 1-stage and 2-stage palatoplasty, syndromic and nonsyndromic, or male and female patients. Primary palatoplasty timing was not a significant predictor.

Conclusion:

Some disparities arose when comparing studies, mainly regarding location and types of clefting prone to oronasal fistulation. Interestingly, the fistula rate does not differ between 1- and 2-stage closure, and timing of the repair does not play a role.

Anatomical Nasal Lining Flaps for Closure of the Nasal Floor in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Lip Repairs Reduce Fistulas at the Alveolus

BACKGROUND

Techniques vary for addressing the nasal floor during cleft lip repair in patients with a cleft lip and palate. Sometimes, no closure is performed, leaving a symptomatic alveolar fistula until the time of alveolar bone grafting. Often, medial and lateral skin flaps are used, but these are often thin and unreliable. Anatomical nasal lining flaps are used to improve closure with robust, well-vascularized flaps that anatomically close the nasal floor.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with a unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary cleft lip repair with nasal lining flaps or with medial and lateral flaps. The primary outcome was presence of a symptomatic and/or visible oronasal fistula.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included. Thirty-seven underwent closure with nasal lining flaps, whereas 27 underwent closure using Millard medial and lateral flaps. The rate of symptomatic/visible fistulas after cleft palate repair was 19 percent (seven of 37) for patients with nasal lining flaps and 44 percent (12 of 27) for patients with medial and lateral flaps (p = 0.0509, Fisher's exact test). The alveolar fistula rate was 3 percent (one of 37) for patients with nasal lining flaps and 30 percent (eight of 27) for patients with medial and lateral flaps (p = 0.0032, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal lining flaps at the time of cleft lip repair effectively close the anterior nasal floor in patients with a unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate. Decreasing the presence of alveolar fistulas after cleft palate repair improves the quality of life for patients with cleft deformities.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Cleft Palate Repair: Description of an Approach, Its Evolution, and Analysis of Postoperative Fistulas

BACKGROUND

Fistulas following cleft palate repair impair speech, health, and hygiene and occur in up to 35 percent of cases. The authors detail the evolution of a surgical approach to palatoplasty; assess the rates, causes, and predictive factors of fistulas; and examine the temporal association of modifications to fistula rates.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 146) undergoing palatoplasty during the first 6 years of practice were included. The technique of repair was based on cleft type, and a common surgical approach was used for all repairs.

RESULTS

The fistula rate was 2.4 percent (n = 125) after primary repair and 0 percent (n = 21) after secondary repair. All complications occurred in patients with type III or IV clefts. Cleft width and cleft-to-total palatal width ratio were associated with fistulas, whereas syndromes, age, and adoption were not. Most complications could also be attributed to technical factors. During the first 2 years, modifications were made around specific anatomical features, including periarticular bony hillocks, maxillopalatine suture, velopalatine pits, and tensor insertion. The fistula rate declined by one-half in subsequent years.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors describe a surgical approach to cleft palate repair, its evolution, and surgically relevant anatomy. Fistulas were associated with increasing cleft severity but could also be attributed to technical factors. A reduction in frequency and severity of fistulas was consistent with a learning curve and may in part be associated with modifications to the surgical approach.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A Standardized Protocol for the Prospective Follow-Up of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

OBJECTIVE

To develop a standardized all-encompassing protocol for the assessment of cleft lip and palate patients with clinical and research implications.

METHOD

Electronic database searches were conducted and 13 major cleft centers worldwide were contacted in order to prepare for the development of the protocol. In preparation, the available evidence was reviewed and potential fistula-related risk determinants from 4 different domains were identified.

RESULTS

No standardized protocol for the assessment of cleft patients could be found in any of the electronic database searches that were conducted. Interviews with representatives from several major centers revealed that the majority of centers do not have a standardized comprehensive strategy for the reporting and follow-up of cleft lip and palate patients. The protocol was developed and consisted of the following domains of determinants: (1) the sociodemographic domain, (2) the cleft defect domain, (3) the surgery domain, and (4) the fistula domain.

CONCLUSION

The proposed protocol has the potential to enhance the quality of patient care by ensuring that multiple patient-related aspects are consistently reported. It may also facilitate future multicenter research, which could contribute to the reduction of fistula occurrence in cleft lip and palate patients.

A Model of the Unmet Need for Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

BACKGROUND

There is a significant unmet need for the cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) ; however, country-level estimates that can be used to inform local and international cleft care program strategies are lacking.

METHODS

Using data from Operation Smile surgical programs in twelve LMICs and country-level indicators from the World Health Organization and World Bank, we developed a model to estimate the proportion of individuals with CL/Ps older than respective surgery age targets for cleft lip and cleft palate surgery (1 and 2 years, respectively). After extrapolating this model to other LMICs with available indicator data, we combined these findings with estimates of CL/P prevalence among live births to estimate the total number of unrepaired CL/P cases in LMICs worldwide.

RESULTS

The models were constructed from a total of 887 cases of cleft palate and 576 cases of cleft lip across the twelve countries. From these, we estimated that there are 616,655 cases of unrepaired CL/P (95 % CI 564,893-678,503) in the 113 countries with available data for extrapolation. The rate of unrepaired CL/Ps ranged from 2.5 per 100,000 population in Romania to 28.5 per 100,000 in Cambodia, respectively (median rate 10.7 per 100,000 population).

CONCLUSIONS

Our model provides marked insight into the global surgical backlog due to cleft lip and palate. While the most populated LMICs have the largest number of unrepaired CL/Ps, low-income countries with relatively less healthcare infrastructure have exceptionally high rates (e.g., Cambodia, Afghanistan, and Nepal). These estimates can be used by local and international cleft care organizations to set program priorities, estimate resource requirements, and inform strategies to support cleft care.

Flap necrosis after palatoplasty in irradiated patient and its reconstruction with tunnelized-facial artery myomucosal island flap

Background

Tunneled transposition of the facial artery myomucosal (FAMM) island flap on the lingual side of the mandible has been reported for intraoral as well as oropharyngeal reconstruction. This modified technique overcomes the limitations of short range and dentition and further confirms the flexibility of the flap. This paper presents a case of reconstructing secondary soft palatal defect due to flap necrosis following two-flap palatoplasty in irradiated patient with lingually transposed facial artery myomucosal island flap.

Case presentation

The authors successfully reconstructed secondary soft palatal defect due to flap necrosis following two-flap palatoplasty in an irradiated 59-year-old female patient with tunnelized-facial artery myomucosal island flap (t-FAMMIF).

Conclusions

Islanding and tunneling modification extends the versatility of the FAMM flap in the reconstruction of soft palatal defects post tumor excision and even after radiation, giving a great range of rotation and eliminating the need for revision in a second stage procedure. The authors thus highly recommend this versatile flap for the reconstruction of small and medium-sized oral defects.

Estimate of Unmet Need for Cleft Lip and/or Palate Surgery in India

IMPORTANCE

The unmet need for cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) care in India is significant. However, estimates required for CL/P care program planning are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the unmet need for CL/P surgery in India at the state level.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

To determine the proportion of individuals with CL/P who presented for care in India, data were used from patients who received care at Operation Smile programs in 12 low- and middle-income countries from June 1, 2013, to May 31, 2014. The resulting model describes the prevalent unmet need for cleft surgery in India by state and includes patients older than the surgery target ages of 1 and 2 years for cleft lip and cleft palate repair, respectively. Next, the total number of unrepaired CL/P cases in each state was estimated using state-level economic and health system indicators.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalent unmet need for CL/P repair.

RESULTS

In the 28 states with available data, an estimated 72 637 cases of unrepaired CL/P (uncertainty interval, 58 644-97 870 cases) were detected. The percentage of individuals with unrepaired CL/P who were older than the respective target ages ranged from 37.0% (95% CI, 30.6%-43.8%) in Goa to 65.8% (95% CI, 60.3%-70.9%) in Bihar (median, 57.9%; interquartile range, 52.6%-63.4%). The rate of unrepaired CL/Ps ranged from less than 3.5 per 100 000 population in Kerala and Goa to 10.9 per 100 000 population in Bihar (median rate, 5.9 [interquartile range, 4.6-7.3] per 100 000 population).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

An estimated 72 000 cases of unrepaired CL/P are found in India. Poor states with less health care infrastructure have exceptionally high rates (eg, Bihar). These estimates are useful for informing international and national CL/P care strategies, allocating resources, and advocating for individuals and families affected by CL/P more broadly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

Fistula in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review

AIMS

(1) Assess the level of available evidence regarding fistula occurrence in cleft lip and palate patients, (2) identify main research areas in the original studies, (3) evaluate the quality of original studies, and (4) summarize the evidence.

METHODS

Two independent researchers searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Web of Knowledge, Web of Science and EMBASE, the Grey literature, and the reference lists of main references. The level of evidence was assessed based on study design and according to the Hierarchy of Evidence. The quality assessment was done using the adapted Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists and a validity scoring system. Main findings were summarized, and fistula rates were compared between early and more recent articles, also between high-quality and low-quality studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search and relevance assessment identified a total of 127 sources of evidence. The overall level of evidence was weak because it was dominated by small studies (<30 subjects), retrospective cohort studies, and case series. Main research areas were either: (1) focused on surgeries or (2) focused on risk determinants associated with fistula occurrence. Recent reports were of higher quality than the older ones, but the overall quality in the majority of reports was low. Knowledge synthesis demonstrated a wide range of rates for primary fistula (0-78%). No significant difference was found in the fistula rates of older studies compared with more recent studies or among different quality studies. Multiple risk determinants were studied and age at surgery, surgeon's experience, type and severity of cleft were the most frequently examined risk determinants. However, findings concerning different risk determinants and fistula occurrence were not consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

The research mainly focused on surgeries and fistula-related risk determinants. The available evidence was low level and of poor quality. No consistent pattern between fistula occurrence and any of the risk determinants could be detected. Reported fistula rates did not differ significantly when comparing older studies with more recent studies or when high-quality studies were compared with low-quality studies.

Effectiveness of tranexamic acid for reducing intraoperative bleeding in palatoplasties: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Few data are available regarding blood loss during cleft palate surgery. This study assessed the effect of using tranexamic acid in the reduction of intraoperative bleeding.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized clinical trial compared intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of oronasal fistulas after palatoplasties in a control group that was given placebo and an intervention group that was given 10 mg/kg tranexamic acid followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h of the same until the end of surgery. Patients who underwent primary palatoplasty with no known or suspected coagulation disorders at our institution during the study period were included in the study.

RESULTS

70 patients were allocated, 66 received the intervention. Blood loss was reduced by 11.9%, without statistical significance. The incidence of fistulas in the intervention and control groups was 12.9% and 18.75%, respectively. The reduction of 5.8% (CI 95%: 12%-23.8%) was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction of intraoperative blood loss was lower than expected and not statistically significant; a larger sample is needed to confirm the observed reduction. The drug did not seem to have negative effects on flap viability.

Five-year speech and language outcomes in children with cleft lip-palate

OBJECTIVE

To investigate 5-year speech and language outcomes in children with cleft lip/palate (CLP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight children aged 4-7 years and 8 months were recruited for this study. Speech abilities including articulation, resonance, voice, and intelligibility were assessed based on Thai Universal Parameters of Speech Outcomes. Language ability was assessed by the Language Screening Test.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that children with clefts had speech and language delay, abnormal understandability, resonance abnormality, and voice disturbance; articulation defects that were 8.33 (1.75, 22.47), 50.00 (32.92, 67.08), 36.11 (20.82, 53.78), 30.56 (16.35, 48.11), and 94.44 (81.34, 99.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Articulation errors were the most common speech and language defects in children with clefts, followed by abnormal understandability, resonance abnormality, and voice disturbance. These results should be of critical concern. Protocol reviewing and early intervention programs are needed for improved speech outcomes.

Surgical Complications in 1408 Primary Cleft Palate Repairs Operated at a Single Center in Guwahati, Assam, India

Objective

To analyze surgical complications after primary cleft palate repair in a setting with limited resources.

Patients and Design

A total of 1608 consecutive cleft palate repairs with 1408 follow-ups, operated upon between 2011 and 2013, were reviewed retrospectively through medical records. Patients were 10 months to 50 years old at the time of surgery, with a median age of 9 years.

Setting

Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center, Guwahati, India.

Intervention

Primary cleft palate repair.

Main Outcome Measures

Postoperative complications in terms of necrosis, dehiscence, fistula, infection, and “hanging palate” were assessed, as was perioperative bleeding. Logistic regression was used with complication (yes/no) as the binary dependent variable and with age, cleft type, and surgeon (visiting/long-term) as covariates.

Results

The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 16.9% with a fistula rate of 13.6%. The incidence of perioperative bleeding was 1.8%. Logistic regression analysis identified cleft severity ( P ≤ .001) and visiting surgeon ( P ≤ .01) as factors related to the incidence of postoperative complications. Age at surgery was related to both the incidence of postoperative complications ( P ≤ .001) and perioperative bleeding ( P < .05).

Conclusion

Due to increased risks of surgical complications, older patients with complete clefts should only be operated upon after careful consideration. In addition, these patients should be assigned to surgeons experienced with this cleft type.

Five surgical maneuvers on nasal mucosa movement in cleft palate repair: A cadaver study

INTRODUCTION

This biomechanical study aims to characterize the nasal mucosa during palatoplasty, thereby describing the soft tissue attachments at different zones and quantifying movement following their release.

METHODS

Palatal nasal mucosa was exposed and divided in the midline in 10 adult cadaver heads. Five consecutive maneuvers were performed: (1) elevation of nasal mucosa off the maxilla, (2) dissection of nasal mucosa from soft palate musculature, (3) separation of nasal mucosa from palatine aponeurosis, (4) release of mucosa at the pterygopalatine junction, and (5) mobilization of vomer flaps. The mucosal movements across the midline at the midpalate (MP) and posterior nasal spine (PNS) following each maneuver were measured.

RESULTS

At the MP, maneuvers 1-4 cumulatively provided 3.8 mm (36.9%), 4.9 mm (47.6%), 6.1 mm (59.2%), and 10.3 mm, respectively. Vomer flap (10.5 mm) elevation led to mobility equivalent to that of maneuvers 1-4 (p = 0.72). At the PNS, cumulative measurements after maneuvers 1-4 were 1.3 mm (10%), 2.4 mm (18.6%), 5.7 mm (44.2%), and 12.9 mm. Here, vomer flaps (6.5 mm) provided less movement (p < 0.001). Maneuver 4 yielded the greatest amount of movement of the lateral nasal mucosa at both MP (4.2 mm, 40.8%) and PNS (7.2 mm, 55.8%).

CONCLUSION

At the MP, complete release of the lateral nasal mucosa achieves as much movement as the vomer flap. At the hard-soft palate junction, the maneuvers progressively add to the movement of the lateral nasal mucosa. The most powerful step is release of attachments along the posterior aspect of the medial pterygoid.

The closure of postpalatoplasty fistula with local turn-down flap

Introduction:

The three common complications after cleft palate repair are velopharyngeal incompetence, delayed maxillary growth, and fistula formation. Fistula formation rates are reported 0–76% in the literature. Wider palatal defects are more challenging to avoid excess tension, and recent reports suggest defects >15 mm have a significantly higher risk of fistula formation. By localization, the fistulas are divided into seven groups with Pittsburgh fistula classification system (PFCS). The timing of treatment of fistula can vary considerably, and a recurrence rate after surgical correction ranges 10–37%.

Materials and Methods:

Three patients with fistula in the hard palate (PFCS-4) in size 7–12 mm, between 2010 and 2012, who underwent fistula repair with local turn-down flap. In two cases, surgery was the first fistula repair and was the second repair in one case. The incisions in the frontal and bilateral edges were made around the fistula, in the distal side of fistula incision was made 3–5 mm longer than fistula size in the oral mucosa, and separate oral and nasal mucosa was rendered by organizing flap. This flap was turn-down and closed nasal side of fistula. The oral side of fistula was closed with the two-flap procedure by Bardach technique.

Results:

The postoperative wound was covered initially in all cases.

Conclusion:

We believe this two layer method for correction big palatal fistula is simpler than tongue, and buccal flap and patients need only intervention in this case. In addition, this method involves more effective usage of mucosal tissues bilaterally for closure on the oral side of the defect.

Incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency and oronasal fistulae after cleft palate repair: A retrospective study of children referred to Isfahan Cleft Care Team between 2005 and 2009

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and fistulae development in patients seen by the Isfahan Cleft Care Team and also determine the association of gender, age at repair, and cleft type with the incidence of each.

METHODS

This retrospective study was completed using records of patients referred to Isfahan Cleft Care Team between 2005 and 2009. One hundred thirty-one patients with a history of cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) who had undergone primary palate repair and were at least 4 years of age at the time of the speech evaluation were included in this review. The main outcome of this study was the incidence of fistulae and hypernasality following palatoplasty. A secondary outcome was the association of gender, age at the time of repair, and cleft type on the incidence of fistulae and hypernasality.

RESULTS

A post-surgical fistula was present in 23.7% of the patients studied. Fistula rates were significantly higher in patients who had undergone repair of bilateral clefts of the lip and palate (40.9%) than for those patients who had undergone repair of a unilateral cleft lip and palate (16.9%) (p=0.02). Presence of a fistula was not associated with gender (p=0.99) or age at time of primary surgical repair (p=0.71). Mild hypernasality was noted in 15.3% of patients. Moderate or severe hypernasality was present in 66.5% of the patients and the remaining cases presented with normal resonance. Severe hypernasality was significantly higher in patients with a Veau IV type cleft as compared to patients with Veau III cleft types (p=0.04). There was a significantly higher incidence of hypernasality in boys than in girls (p<0.001). The association of age at the time of palatal repair and incidence of hypernasality was not significant (r=0.13, p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, post-surgical complications were high in this cohort of patients who had undergone cleft palate repair by Isfahan Cleft Care Team during the study time frame. Therefore, there is a high priority need for increased training of best practices for the surgeons.

Surgical learning curve in performing palatoplasty: A retrospective study in 200 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the experience of the surgeon on the occurrence of fistulas following palatoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive children treated between 2006 and 2013 for cleft palate by a single surgeon. Cleft palate repair was performed using the von Langenbeck technique, Furlow palatoplasty, buccal flap or Vomer flap. Data was collected for age, sex, date of birth, syndrome, adoption, cleft palate type, type of repair, cleft width, fistula occurrence and location of fistula.

RESULTS

A total of 276 operations were performed in 200 children (Veau I, II, III, IV). Mean age at surgery was 21.9 months (range: 6.2 months to 26 years 8.3 months). Postoperatively, palatal fistulas occurred in eight patients (4.0%), however, the incidence was 3.0% in the non-adoption group and 9.7% in the adoption population. In this study there was no statistically significant evidence of a surgical learning curve, and no significant associations between fistula rate and sex, adoption, syndrome, cleft type, cleft width, or type of repair.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates a fistula formation rate of 3.0% for the non-adoption population and 9.7% for the adoption population. There was no statistically significant evidence of a learning curve during the first few years of performing cleft palate repair. No other independent risk factors for postoperative fistula formation were identified; however, the benefit of a vomer flap and subsequent reduction in fistula incidence was demonstrated.

Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The development of an oronasal fistula after primary cleft palate repair has a wide variation reported in the literature. The aim of this review is to identify the reported oronasal fistula incidence to provide a benchmark for surgical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the incidence of fistula. Multiple meta-analyses were performed to pool proportions of reported fistulae, in each data set corresponding to the continent of origin of the study, type of cleft, and techniques of cleft palate repair used.

RESULTS

A total of 9294 patients were included from 44 studies. The overall incidence of reported fistula was 8.6 percent (95 percent CI, 6.4 to 11.1 percent). There was no significant difference in the fistula incidence corresponding to the continent of origin of each study or the repair technique used. The incidence of fistula in cleft lip-cleft palate was 17.9 percent, which was significantly higher (p = 0.03) than in cases of cleft palate alone (5.4 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Palatal fistulae were more likely to occur in cases of combined cleft lip-cleft palate, compared with cleft palate alone. The authors would recommend the prospective examination and recording of all fistulae to a standardized classification scheme.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Evolution in minimal-incision palatoplasty: surgical technique and outcomes in 67 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Conventional palatoplasty relies on extensive mucosal incisions and isolation of flaps on the palatine vessels to facilitate midline closure and velar reconstruction. This introduces substantial scarring, which has adverse effects on vascularity and growth. The authors have developed a minimally invasive palatoplasty technique that may have advantages over traditional techniques. The authors present their operative experience and outcomes when using the minimally invasive method paired with a novel cranial base maneuver for nasal mucosa closure.

METHODS

Based on cadaveric dissections, the authors developed a modified minimal-incision approach that permits anatomical reconstruction from a midline approach. From 2003 to 2010, a retrospective review was performed on 67 consecutive minimal-incision palatoplasties. Cases requiring relaxing incision and/or conversion to other palatoplasty techniques were compared with minimal incision alone.

RESULTS

Minimally invasive palatoplasty alone was able to be performed in 78 percent (n=52) of all cases. Fistula rates were 7.6 percent (n=4) in the minimally invasive palatoplasty group and 20 percent (n=3) in the relaxing/conversion group (p=0.04). Of patients requiring relaxing incisions/conversion, a higher percentage were syndromic (73 percent; p=0.01). Eighty-nine percent of all Veau class I defects were able to be successfully closed with the minimally invasive palatoplasty approach (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal-incision palatoplasty paired with a cranial base maneuver for nasal mucosa elevation results in adequate soft-tissue mobility and length to arrive at a tension-free closure. Fistula and velopharyngeal insufficiency rates are comparable to that of other techniques, and theoretical advantages of this technique will be borne out by longer term follow-up.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Intraoperative high-dose epinephrine infiltration in cleft palate repair

OBJECTIVE

Local infiltration of epinephrine before surgical procedures is a well-accepted technique to promote vasoconstriction. Typically, the dose of epinephrine is limited by the co-administration of local anesthetic as well as the risk for arrhythmogenesis and hemodynamic changes. In addition, some controversy exists regarding the acceptable dose of epinephrine given to children. This retrospective review examines the use and safety of "high-dose" epinephrine in palatoplasty at our cleft-craniofacial center.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of epinephrine use in primary palatoplasty at a tertiary children's hospital from 2003 to 2007 was performed. Operative and anesthetic records were reviewed for hypertension (systolic blood pressure, >120 or diastolic blood pressure, >70) and tachycardia (>190 beats per min) as defined by the American Heart Association guidelines, as well as dysrhythmias, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients who underwent consecutive primary palatoplasties performed by a single surgeon were identified. After the induction of anesthesia and before incision, the patients received an initial epinephrine infiltration (without local anesthetic) up to a maximum 10 μg/kg. The average total dose of epinephrine administered during palatoplasty was 12.8 μg/kg (range, 3.2-75.0 μg/kg). Doses up to a maximum of 10 μg/kg were administered as needed at 30-minute intervals. No instances of clinically unstable tachycardia or hypertension occurred. A total of 21.6% of the patients (22/102) experienced an instance of hypertension, and only 13.7% of these (14/102) were related to epinephrine administration. One (1%) postoperative fistula was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Locally infiltrated high-dose epinephrine during palatoplasty can be safely used as a means of vasoconstriction. Doses reaching a maximum of 10 μg/kg, administered as needed at 30-minute intervals, do not seem to be a significant risk for hemodynamic instability, intraoperative complications, or postoperative complications.

Persistent oro-nasal fistula after primary cleft palate repair: minimizing the rate via a standardized protocol

OBJECTIVES

Multiple methods are described for cleft palate repair. Similarly, a wide range of postoperative oro-nasal fistula rates are described, depending on technique and series examined. We describe long-term outcomes and fistula rates for primary cleft palate repair for a single surgeon using a standardized protocol. Furlow palatoplasty was used for clefts limited to the soft palate, and two-flap palatoplasty was used for clefts involving both the hard and soft palate.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively gathered data.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients underwent cleft palate repair within the study period. Average age at time of repair was 1.69 years (range 0.47-12.1 years), 19 patients had cleft palate as a part of a known genetic syndrome, and male:female ratio was 1.05:1. Overall fistula rate requiring repair was 5.5%, and fistula development was not significantly associated with type of cleft repair or use of AlloDerm in the repair.

CONCLUSIONS

A very low rate of oro-nasal fistula and good postoperative outcomes were achieved utilizing this protocol for cleft palate repair. It is effective both in isolated cleft palate, as well as in more complicated syndromic patients. It is possible that significant associations between repair technique and fistula rate exist that were not elucidated in this study as a result of the small number of oro-nasal fistulas.

Influence of patient age and experience of the surgeon on early complications after surgical closure of the cleft palate--a retrospective cohort study

Comparative studies on timing of palatoplasty are rare. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the influence of early (<14 months) and later (>14 months) one-step closure of the soft and hard palate on early complications. All non-syndromic patients from 1999 to 2009 were included; 6-14 months n = 41 and 15-24 months n = 53. Each palatoplasty was performed as a single-step procedure using bipedicled flaps by a team of two Maxillofacial Surgeons either supervising or operating. The surgeon was rated as "non-experienced" when having performed less than 10 palatoplasties under supervision. Main outcome variable is the occurrence of residual fistula. Fistula occurred in four (4.5%) of the patients. In the multivariate model with respect to the occurrence of fistula neither age, leucocyte count, duration of surgery, nor experience of the surgeon showed a significant influence on the occurrence of a fistula. Only reduced weight contributed to a significantly higher risk of post-operative fistula. In conclusion patient age, experience of surgeon, and duration of surgery had no influence on the early outcome. High leucocyte count had a tendency for and reduced weight had a significant influence on fistula occurrence. Long-term outcome on speech development and maxillary growth have to be collected.

Effectiveness of buccal fat in closing residual midpalatal and posterior palatal fistulas in patients previously treated for clefts

PURPOSE

The present retrospective study assessed the outcome and effectiveness of the buccal fat pad flap for closure of postoperative midpalatal fistulas and fistulas of the posterior palate in patients previously treated for cleft palate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of 29 patients with residual midpalatal and posterior palatal fistulas treated using buccal fat pad flaps were assessed. Of the 29 patients, 18 were males and 11 were females, aged 2.5 to 19 years. The fistula size was 10 to 20 mm.

RESULTS

Full epithelialization of the flap had occurred within 4 weeks in all 29 patients. The fistulas had completely closed in 28 patients. In 1 patient, a 2-mm defect was noted in the anterior part of the fistula repair that had healed after 2 months without intervention.

CONCLUSION

The buccal fat pad flap can be used to repair any remaining postoperative palatal fistulas that are 10 to 20 mm in size.

Is nasal mucoperiosteal closure necessary in cleft palate repair?

BACKGROUND

The goals of successful palate repair include optimizing speech and feeding, mitigating adverse maxillary growth effect, and avoiding fistulae. The necessity of vomerine and/or nasal-side mucosa repair has not been tested. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of palate repairs with and without nasal mucoperiosteal closure. The authors used the null hypothesis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive cleft palate repairs performed between 2001 and 2004. Group 1 underwent two-layer repair (oral and nasal/vomerine mucoperiosteal flaps), and group 2 underwent one-layer closure (oral mucoperiosteal flaps) only. Both groups underwent double-opposing Z-plasty posteriorly. Demographic and perioperative outcome variables were recorded and compared statistically.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 51 children (23 boys and 28 girls), and 80 percent were nonsyndromic. Group 2 included 29 patients (15 boys and 14 girls), and 72 percent were without an associated diagnosis. Age at repair was similar (20.80 and 15.17 months, respectively). Operative time was less for one-layer repair (84 versus 135 minutes) (p = 0.0001). Complications, length of stay, and follow-up length were similar between the two cohorts. Velopharyngeal dysfunction was rare in both groups. A single fistula occurred in each group. Anthropometric data revealed larger maxillary arc and tragus-subnasale lengths in group 2. Growth velocities were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The goals of cleft palate repair can be efficiently achieved using a one-sided oral mucoperiosteal repair only. Omitting the nasal-side and vomer repair does not increase fistula formation or prove detrimental to velopharyngeal function, and may facilitate maxillary growth.