Prospective, before-after cohort study to assess the efficacy of laser therapy on hypertrophic burn scars. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:521-526. [PMID: 23542846 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e31827eac5e]

Scar Management in Pediatric Patients

Background and Objectives: Pediatric patients can acquire scars from both accidental injury and surgical procedures. While scars cannot be avoided if a full-thickness injury occurs, scar visibility may be minimized through a variety of approaches. In this narrative review, we evaluate the current evidence and propose an algorithm for scar management in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: A review of the literature was performed for scar management techniques for pediatric patients. Management modalities based on the type of scar and dosing, treatment regimen, and safety profiles are described in this article and used to create a scar management algorithm. Results: The initial step to scar management in the pediatric population involves ensuring minimal wound tension, which can be achieved through making the incision along relaxed skin tension lines, and early, minimal tension wound closure. Subsequent treatments to optimize scar care should begin 2-3 weeks following wound closure and involve the application of silicone gel or sheets and scar massaging. When topical products are insufficient, laser therapy can be utilized for the management of immature erythematous or thick scars. When mature, pathological scars form such as atrophic scars, hyperpigmentation, hypertrophic scars, or keloids, a combination of modalities is recommended. These modalities vary by scar type and include retinoids and dermabrasion for atrophic scars; retinoids, hydroquinone, and laser therapy for hyperpigmentation; and pressure therapy, corticosteroids, and laser therapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids. When mature, pathological scars persist following 12 months of non-invasive therapies, surgical excision should be considered. Conclusions: Several treatment options are available to manage scars in the pediatric population depending on scar type.

Recovery in patients undergoing ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser for adult hypertrophic burn scars: A longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (AFCO2L) is widely used as a treatment for hypertrophic burn scars. This study aimed to evaluate clinician and patient-reported outcomes after AFCO2L treatment, safety, and identify factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

This longitudinal study recruited adult patients with hypertrophic burn scars treated with AFCO2L at a single Australian burn unit. Patients received up to four AFCO2L treatments over approximately 12 months. Outcomes were ultrasound scar thickness, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Scale (BBSIP), measured at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after the first AFCO2L treatment. Analysis used mixed effects linear models.

RESULTS

47 patients were included with median age 32 years (IQR: 24, 53) and median burn TBSA of 35 % (IQR: 7.5 %, 48 %). Statistically significant improvements between baseline and 12-month follow-up occurred in scar thickness, and all POSAS and BBSIP subscores. Most improvements remained when accounting for TBSA, Fitzpatrick skin type, scar maturity, and body area treated. Patients reported transient symptoms after 61 of 89 (69 %) AFCO2L treatments, but infection or delayed wound healing occurred after only 4 of 89 (4 %) treatments.

CONCLUSION

This study supports safety and improved clinician and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing AFCO2L for hypertrophic burn scars.

Prophylactic Antibiotics Are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment

CO2 ablative fractional laser (CO2 AFL) therapy is a safe and effective procedure when used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars for burn patients. It has a high patient satisfaction rate and a minimal side effect profile, typically consisting of postoperative pain, irritation, surgical site inflammation, and, in rare cases, infection. Although prophylactic antibiotics have historically been recommended, there is a paucity of literature on the topic and recent studies indicate that they may be unnecessary in routine cases. In this retrospective, single-center descriptive study, 230 cases in patients with hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 AFL therapy were compared. 28 cases were with the use of prophylactic antibiotics and 201 cases were without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. We found that there was no significant association between the use of antibiotics and the prevention of topical skin infection in cases treated with CO2 AFL therapy (P = 1). Therefore, we conclude that the omission of prophylactic antibiotics is not associated with an increased risk of infection and recommend that prophylactic antibiotics should not be indicated in the setting of routine CO2 AFL therapy for patients with hypertrophic burn scars.

Efficacy of Nd:YAG Laser and Intralesional Triamcinolone Injection Combination Therapy in the Postoperative Management of Keloids

BACKGROUND

Keloids, characterized by protruding scars that extend beyond the original skin damage site, cause significant emotional stress and reduced quality of life. Their exact pathogenesis remains unclear, with various hypotheses including growth factor imbalances and extracellular matrix changes. No single treatment is universally accepted, but multiple modalities like triamcinolone acetonide injection (TAC), laser therapies, and surgery are commonly used.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved East Asian patients who underwent keloid scar excision between March 2019 and June 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: one receiving only TAC injections and the other a combination of TAC and Nd:YAG laser therapy. The efficacy of treatments was evaluated using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), with follow-ups at six and twelve months after operation.

RESULTS

The study involved 111 patients. Both treatment groups showed significant improvements in mVSS and POSAS scores, but the combination therapy group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in POSAS scores and lower recurrence rates at 12 months compared to the TAC-only group. However, there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Dual therapy involving TAC injection and Nd:YAG laser treatment was more effective than TAC injection alone for managing keloid scars after surgery. This combination therapy showed better outcomes in preventing keloid recurrence and improving scar status at 12 months after operation, along with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical Management of Chronic Neuropathic Burn Pain

Burn-related chronic neuropathic pain can contribute to a decreased quality of life. When medical and pharmacologic therapies prove ineffective, patients should undergo evaluation for surgical intervention, consisting of a detailed physical examination and elective diagnostic nerve block, to identify an anatomic cause of pain. Based on symptoms and physical examination findings, particularly Tinel's sign, treatments can vary, including a trial of laser therapies, fat grafting, or nerve surgeries (nerve decompression, neuroma excision, targeted muscle reinnervation, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces, and vascularized denervated muscle targets). It is essential to counsel patients to establish appropriate expectations prior to treatment with a multidisciplinary team.

Interventions for postburn pruritus

BACKGROUND

Postburn pruritus (itch) is a common and distressing symptom experienced on healing or healed burn or donor site wounds. Topical, systemic, and physical treatments are available to control postburn pruritus; however, it remains unclear how effective these are.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for treating postburn pruritus in any care setting.

SEARCH METHODS

In September 2022, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase, and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries and scanned references of relevant publications to identify eligible trials. There were no restrictions with respect to language, publication date, or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled people with postburn pruritus to compare an intervention for postburn pruritus with any other intervention, placebo or sham intervention, or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 RCTs assessing 21 interventions with 1166 randomised participants. These 21 interventions can be grouped into six categories: neuromodulatory agents (such as doxepin, gabapentin, pregabalin, ondansetron), topical therapies (such as CQ-01 hydrogel, silicone gel, enalapril ointment, Provase moisturiser, beeswax and herbal oil cream), physical modalities (such as massage therapy, therapeutic touch, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, enhanced education about silicone gel sheeting), laser scar revision (pulsed dye laser, pulsed high-intensity laser, fractional CO2 laser), electrical stimulation (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation), and other therapies (cetirizine/cimetidine combination, lemon balm tea). Most RCTs were conducted at academic hospitals and were at a high risk of performance, attrition, and detection bias. While 24 out of 25 included studies reported change in burn-related pruritus, secondary outcomes such as cost-effectiveness, pain, patient perception, wound healing, and participant health-related quality of life were not reported or were reported incompletely. Neuromodulatory agents versus antihistamines or placebo There is low-certainty evidence that doxepin cream may reduce burn-related pruritus compared with oral antihistamine (mean difference (MD) -2.60 on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS), 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.79 to -1.42; 2 studies, 49 participants). A change of 2 points represents a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Due to very low-certainty evidence, it is uncertain whether doxepin cream impacts the incidence of somnolence as an adverse event compared to oral antihistamine (risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.25; 1 study, 24 participants). No data were reported on pain in the included study. There is low-certainty evidence that gabapentin may reduce burn-related pruritus compared with cetirizine (MD -2.40 VAS, 95% CI -4.14 to -0.66; 1 study, 40 participants). A change of 2 points represents a MCID. There is low-certainty evidence that gabapentin reduces the incidence of somnolence compared to cetirizine (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.38; 1 study, 40 participants). No data were reported on pain in the included study. There is low-certainty evidence that pregabalin may result in a reduction in burn-related pruritus intensity compared with cetirizine with pheniramine maleate (MD -0.80 VAS, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.36; 1 study, 40 participants). A change of 2 points represents a MCID. There is low-certainty evidence that pregabalin reduces the incidence of somnolence compared to cetirizine (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.69; 1 study, 40 participants). No data were reported on pain in the included study. There is moderate-certainty evidence that ondansetron probably results in a reduction in burn-related pruritus intensity compared with diphenhydramine (MD -0.76 on a 0 to 10 numeric analogue scale (NAS), 95% CI -1.50 to -0.02; 1 study, 38 participants). A change of 2 points represents a MCID. No data were reported on pain and adverse events in the included study. Topical therapies versus relevant comparators There is moderate-certainty evidence that enalapril ointment probably decreases mean burn-related pruritus compared with placebo control (MD -0.70 on a 0 to 4 scoring table for itching, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.36; 1 study, 60 participants). No data were reported on pain and adverse events in the included study. Physical modalities versus relevant comparators Compared with standard care, there is low-certainty evidence that massage may reduce burn-related pruritus (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.86, 95% CI -1.45 to -0.27; 2 studies, 166 participants) and pain (SMD -1.32, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.98). These SMDs equate to a 4.60-point reduction in pruritus and a 3.74-point reduction in pain on a 10-point VAS. A change of 2 VAS points in itch represents a MCID. No data were reported on adverse events in the included studies. There is low-certainty evidence that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) may reduce burn-related pruritus compared with sham stimulation (SMD -1.20, 95% CI -1.65 to -0.75; 2 studies, 91 participants). This equates to a 5.93-point reduction in pruritus on a 22-point 12-item Pruritus Severity Scale. There is low-certainty evidence that ESWT may reduce pain compared with sham stimulation (MD 2.96 on a 0 to 25 pressure pain threshold (PPT), 95% CI 1.76 to 4.16; 1 study, 45 participants). No data were reported on adverse events in the included studies. Laser scar revision versus untreated or placebo controls There is moderate-certainty evidence that pulsed high-intensity laser probably results in a reduction in burn-related pruritus intensity compared with placebo laser (MD -0.51 on a 0 to 1 Itch Severity Scale (ISS), 95% CI -0.64 to -0.38; 1 study, 49 participants). There is moderate-certainty evidence that pulsed high-intensity laser probably reduces pain compared with placebo laser (MD -3.23 VAS, 95% CI -5.41 to -1.05; 1 study, 49 participants). No data were reported on adverse events in the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate to low-certainty evidence on the effects of 21 interventions. Most studies were small and at a high risk of bias related to blinding and incomplete outcome data. Where there is moderate-certainty evidence, practitioners should consider the applicability of the evidence for their patients.

Microneedling in the Treatment of Post-burn Hypertrophic Scars

INTRODUCTION

Post-burn hypertrophic scars are an important cause of physical discomfort, limitation of movements, psychological disorders, low self-esteem and reduced quality of life. Treatment for this condition is complex and involves several options. Microneedling, also known as minimally invasive percutaneous collagen induction, is an affordable minimally invasive option that can be combined with other treatments, including ablative ones.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to present our microneedling approach for the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns.

METHOD

A prospective study of 15 patients with post-burn hypertrophic scars was conducted between October 2016 and June 2022. All patients were treated with microneedling and drug delivery of triamcinolone. Scars were evaluated using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Burn Scar Assessment Scale (BSAS) and angle measurement for amplitude of movement evaluation of joints.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in the VSS score was obtained after microneedling (8.8 ± 0.44 to 4.1 ± 0.98; p = 0.012), especially in the acute group (less than 1 year after burns): 9.3 ± 0.49 to 3.5 ± 1.36; p = 0.041. There was a significant and progressive improvement of the scars throughout the treatment sessions in all criteria evaluated and in the ranges of joint movement (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Our microneedling protocol promoted a significant improvement of post-burn scars, especially in acute hypertrophic scars, and in the amplitude of joint motion. Sequential treatments provided progressive improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment of hypopigmented burn hypertrophic scars with short-term topical tacrolimus does not lead to repigmentation

OBJECTIVES

Dyschromia is an understudied aspect of hypertrophic scar (HTS). The use of topical tacrolimus has successfully shown repigmentation in vitiligo patients through promotion of melanogenesis and melanocyte proliferation. It was hypothesized that HTSs treated with topical tacrolimus would have increased repigmentation compared to controls.

METHODOLOGY

Full-thickness burns in red Duroc pigs were either treated with excision and meshed split-thickness skin grafting or excision and no grafting, and these wounds formed hypopigmented HTSs (n = 8). Half of the scars had 0.1% tacrolimus ointment applied to the scar twice a day for 21 days, while controls had no treatment. Further, each scar was bisected with half incurring fractional ablative CO2 laser treatment before topical tacrolimus application to induce laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD). Pigmentation was evaluated using a noninvasive probe to measure melanin index (MI) at Days 0 (pretreatment), 7, 14, and 21. At each timepoint, punch biopsies were obtained and fixed in formalin or were incubated in dispase. The formalin-fixed biopsies were used to evaluate melanin levels by H&E staining. The biopsies incubated in dispase were used to obtain epidermal sheets. The ESs were then flash frozen and RNA was isolated from them and used in quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for melanogenesis-related genes: Tyrosinase (TYR), TYR-related protein-1 (TYRP1), and dopachrome tautomerase (DCT). Analysis of variance test with Šídák's multiple comparisons test was used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Over time, within the grafted HTS and the NS group, there were no significant changes in MI, except for Week 3 in the -Tacro group. (+Tacro HTS= pre = 685.1 ± 42.0, w1 = 741.0 ± 54.16, w2 = 750.8 ± 59.0, w3 = 760.9 ± 49.8) (-Tacro HTS= pre = 700.4 ± 54.3, w1 = 722.3 ± 50.7, w2 = 739.6 ± 53.2, w3 = 722.7 ± 50.5). Over time, within the ungrafted HTS and the NS group, there were no significant changes in MI. (+Tacro HTS= pre = 644.9 ± 6.9, w1 = 661.6 ± 3.3, w2 = 650.3 ± 6.2, w3 = 636.3 ± 7.4) (-Tacro HTS= pre = 696.8 ± 8.0, w1 = 695.8 ± 12.3, w2 = 678.9 ± 14.0, w3 = 731.2 ± 50.3). LADD did not lead to any differential change in pigmentation compared to the non-LADD group. There was no evidence of increased melanogenesis within the tissue punch biopsies at any timepoint. There were no changes in TYR, TYRP1, or DCT gene expression after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Hypopigmented HTSs treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with or without LADD did not show significantly increased repigmentation. This study was limited by a shorter treatment interval than what is known to be required in vitiligo patients for repigmentation. The use of noninvasive, topical treatments to promote repigmentation are an appealing strategy to relieve morbidity associated with dyschromic burn scars and requires further investigation.

Prevention and Treatment of Burn Scar Contracture: A Practical Review

Burn contracture affects close to one-third of all burn patients, leading to significant functional impairment and costs. Effective prevention and treatment strategies are necessary to decrease morbidity and unnecessary costs. This scoping review aimed to summarize prevention and treatment strategies used for management of burn scar contractures published in the literature since 2000. A comprehensive PubMed review was performed in October 2022 to identify methods of burn contracture prevention and treatments. Non-English, duplicate, and unavailable articles were excluded. Data were extracted including publication year, techniques, and outcomes. A total of 327 publications met criteria for inclusion. Most articles were published in 2011 (n = 22). Treatment strategies were discussed in 82.9% of studies, prevention in 16.5%, and both in 0.6%. The most common areas discussed included the upper extremity (n = 127) and neck (n = 102). Flaps were the most frequently used method (n = 208), followed by autografts (n = 89). Most preventative therapies were still in early stages of development. Burn contracture management requires a highly individualized approach with many available reconstructive techniques available. Further research is needed to improve prevention techniques and decrease morbidity and cost to patients.

Laser, Intense Pulsed Light, and Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Burn Scarring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Burns and scarring are considered some of the greatest problems in public health because of their frequent occurrence. Today, photo-electric technology shows promising results in the treatment of burn scars. Over the years, more clinical trials and more technologies for scarring have emerged. The aim of this study was to determine better timing and methods of photo-electric therapy for burn scars. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023397244), following the PRISMA statement, and was carried out in concordance with the PRISMA checklist. In October 2022, we searched PubMed.gov, Embase, and the Cochrane library (1980-present) for published studies related to the photo-electric treatment of burn scars. Two review authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias among the studies included, and carried out NIH assessments to assess the certainty of the evidence. A third review author arbitrated any disagreements. Our research included 39 studies. We found evidence suggesting that photo-electric therapy between six months and one year offers significantly better outcomes than treatment of scarring after one year. The evidence also suggests the use of IPL for the treatment of early burn scarring. However, it is important to emphasize that the scientific evidence remains insufficient. We need more clinical trials of higher quality and with less heterogeneity to confirm our results.

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser improves quality of life in patients with extensive burn scars: A nested case-control study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (CO₂ -AFL) for small-area burn scar management shows encouraging outcomes. Few studies, however, focused on comprehensive outcomes following CO₂ -AFL treatment for extensive burn scars. This study evaluated whether CO₂ -AFL surgery improved the quality of life (QoL) for burn survivors with extensive hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A retrospective nested case-control study was initiated to analyze the efficacy of CO₂ -AFL treatment for patients with large-area burn scars. Patients with extensive burn scars (≥30% total body surface area [TBSA]) were registered in our hospital from March 2016 to October 2018. Patients undergoing CO₂ -AFL surgery were divided into CO₂ -AFL group, and patients undergoing conventional surgery were matched in a 1:1 ratio as the conventional surgery group according to the burned area. The questionnaires were collected and followed up. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) were the primary parameters. Secondary parameters included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), University of North Carolina "4P" Scars Scale (UNC4P), Patient Scars Assessment Scale for Patient (POSAS-P), and Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions (DN4).

RESULTS

23 patients (55.96 ± 21.59% TBSA) were included in CO₂ -AFL group and 23 patients (57.87 ± 18.21% TBSA) in conventional surgery group. Both the BSHS-B total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 115.35 ± 29.24 vs. 85.43 ± 33.19, p = 0.002) and the SF-36 total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 427.79 ± 118.27 vs. 265.65 ± 81.66, p < 0.001) for the CO₂ -AFL group were higher than those for the conventional surgery group. Parameters for the CO₂ -AFL group were lower than those for the conventional surgery group in all of the following comparisons: PSQI total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 7.70 ± 3.74 vs. 12.26 ± 4.61, p = 0.001), POSAS-P total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 26.48 ± 6.60 vs. 33.04 ± 4.56, p < 0.001), UNC4P total score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 5.57 ± 1.97 vs. 7.26 ± 1.81, p = 0.004), and DN4 score (CO₂ -AFL vs. conventional surgery: 3 [2-5] vs. 5 [4-8], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional surgery, whole scar CO₂ -AFL surgery dramatically improved physical and mental health as well as QoL for people with extensive burn scars. Additionally, CO₂ -AFL enhanced the evaluation of scars including their appearance, pain, itching, and a host of other symptoms.

Analysis of the Utility of CO2 and Pulse-Dye Lasers Together and Separately in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Burn Scars

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic burn scars (HTBSs) remain a significant source of morbidity. Contemporary treatment has evolved to use CO2 lasers and/or pulse-dye lasers (PDLs) to reduce scar thickness (ST) and erythema. This study seeks to compare treatment efficacy with CO2 or PDL individually and in combination.

METHODS

Patients undergoing laser treatments for HTBSs were enrolled. Three 3 × 3 cm squares of HTBSs were randomized to receive treatment with CO2 laser, PDL or CO2 + PDL. Patients underwent 3 treatments, 4 to 6 weeks apart and were followed up over 3 to 6 months. Scar assessments occurred at each visit before treatment and consisted of photographs, ultrasound, colorimetry, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Score.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty completed 2 treatments (80%) and 11 completed all 3 treatments (44%). Median initial ST was 0.3 cm. Median time since injury was 8 months. Hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 or PDL showed a significant decrease in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score from visit 1 to 3 (P = 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). When separated by ST, thick scars (≥0.3 cm) showed a significant decrease in thickness between visit 1 and 2 using all laser modalities (CO2 + PDL, P = 0.01; CO2, P = 0.02; PDL, P = 0.03). Thin scars (<0.3 cm) showed a reduction in thickness by visit 3 after CO2 + PDL or PDL alone (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Separating scars by age, younger scars (<9 months) showed a significant reduction in thickness between visit 1 and 2 for CO2 treatment (P = 0.04), and between visit 2 and 3 for CO2 + PDL treatment (P = 0.04). Hypertrophic burn scars treated with PDL did not demonstrate a significant reduction in thickness until visit 3 (P = 0.002). Older scars (≥9 months) showed a significant reduction in thickness between visit 1 and 2 only after CO2 + PDL (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertrophic burn scars of varying ages, etiologies, and thicknesses were examined in this study with greater degree of early reduction seen in thicker scars using all laser modalities of CO2, PDL or in combination. However, there was no clinically meaningful benefit found with combination as compared with individual treatment. These data support the use of laser to improve HTBS but does not support one modality or combination of modalities over another.

Molecular Features of Hypertrophic Scars After Thermal Injury: Is There a Biologic Basis for Laser Therapy?

Significance: Hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids are common after thermal injuries and other trauma to deep regions of dermis of the skin. These abnormal scars can cause contractures and the thick masses of scar tissue that result in functional and cosmetic impairment. Management of these dermal fibrotic conditions includes a wide range of medical and surgical treatments, which can be time consuming, only partially effective, and often uncomfortable for patients. Recent Advances: The molecular pathophysiology of HTS has become more understood over the past two decades, where thermal injury to the reticular dermis results in an inflammatory response, fibrogenic growth factor release, and the formation of a dermal scar with increased collagen and proteoglycan composition in an abnormal morphology. Lasers are becoming a widely used form of treatment for these types of scars; however, the evidence for the beneficial effects of laser treatments and the understanding of their mechanism of action are still evolving. Critical Issues: Paradoxically, laser delivery of thermal energy to the skin is suggested to improve scar remodeling and wound healing, yet HTS is a well-recognized complication of excessive thermal energy delivered by laser treatments. This review aims to examine the current evidence for the use of lasers for HTS, and to investigate the molecular mechanisms where re-injury of a burn scar from laser treatment could result in overall improvements in scar quality. Future Directions: Improved design of clinical trials for the treatment of scarring in the future will evolve from new methodology and models of HTS in animals and humans.

Skin Wound Tension Reduction Device Combined with Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser to Reduce Scar Formation After Excision of Pediatric Facial Skin Lesions: A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of skin wound tension reduction device (SWTRD) combined with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser (CO2-AFL) for the prevention of scar formation following the excision of facial cutaneous lesions in children.

Methods

Patients undergoing surgical excision of facial cutaneous lesions in our hospital between May 2019 and April 2021 were enrolled. After the excision of facial cutaneous lesions and based on the personal intents and conditions, patients were assigned to undergo SWTRD combined with CO2-AFL. Outcome evaluations were as follows: defect size, incision width, scar width, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and University of North Carolina 4P Scar Scale (UNC4P).

Results

A total of 25 pediatric patients (mean age, 9.88 years) were enrolled in the study. Following the treatment of SWTRD+CO2-AFL, scar widths were relatively narrow and the appearance of the incision scars was significantly improved. A significant reduction in the patient-reported UNC4P scores at 6 months (3, 1–4) was observed when compared with that at 2 months (0, 0–1) after surgery (p<0.001). A similar reduction in the VSS scar scale was also evident (6 months: 1, 0.75–2.5 vs 2 months: 6.5–8.5; p<0.001).

Conclusion

Combined SWTRD and CO2-AFL treatment effectively modulates the scar formation after the incision is healed and resulting in preventing scar widening, leading to the improvement of scar appearance, reduction in wound pain and pruritus and its overall prognosis.

Efficacy of the Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser in the Treatment of Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Keloid and hypertrophic scars are the most common types of pathological scars. They can cause itching, pain, erythema, and psychological stress due to cosmetic problems, decreasing the quality of life for affected individuals. The neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) multipurpose laser is used to treat pathological scars, and studies have shown that the Nd:YAG laser can markedly improve scarring.

AIMS

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of the Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang was performed between January 1st, 2010, and July 14th, 2021. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used to evaluate treatment outcomes. We used the R version 4.0.0 software for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The Nd:YAG laser improved the condition of keloid and hypertrophic scars and reduced VSS score (mean difference [MD]: 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08-3.84, p < 0.01). There was no obvious difference in the results between regions. A subgroup analysis by scar type revealed that the curative effect of the Nd:YAG laser on keloid scars (MD: 2.02, 95% CI: 0.58-4.63, p = 0.10) was less marked compared with that on hypertrophic scars (MD: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.58-4.52, p < 0.01). With the combined use of the Nd:YAG laser and other treatment methods, a more significant change in VSS score was noted (MD: 4.28, 95% CI: 2.07-6.49).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that the Nd:YAG laser can improve the condition of keloid and hypertrophic scars and effectively reduce VSS score. Moreover, the curative effect of this approach on keloid scars is less marked compared with that on hypertrophic scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Early Laser for Burn Scars (ELABS): protocol for a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars with Pulsed Dye Laser and standard care compared to standard care alone [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

This paper outlines the protocol for a study that is being carried out at multiple centres across the UK in the next three years. It is a Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) study funded by the National Institute for Healthcare Research (NIHR). The aim is to assess the effectiveness of treating hypertrophic burns scars with pulsed dye laser (PDL) at an early stage of scar formation. The objective is to improve Quality of Life for the patient by improving both the appearance and quality of burn scarring, as well as reducing its psychological impact. This is a parallel-arm randomised, controlled trial to compare PDL and standard care against standard care alone. The difference is measured between baseline and six-month follow-up. Recruits are within three months of healing from a burn injury; with wounds showing a defined potential for hypertrophic scarring. A total of 120 patients are recruited in a multi-centre study; with randomisation in a 1:1 allocation to each arm. The treatment arm receives 3 PDL treatments at six-week intervals in addition to standard care, whereas the control arm receives standard care alone. The primary outcome is the patient-rated part of the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS). Psychological and psycho-social impact is evaluated using the CARe burn scale (UWE, Bristol) and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) is determined using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The study evaluates both the cost-effectiveness through an economic analysis and the patient-reported experience of the treatment by phone interviews.

Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery of Tranexamic Acid by Picosecond Laser in Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation: A Split-Area Double Blind Randomized Prospective Study

Background: Tranexamic acid has been reported to benefit the treatment of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) could facilitate the efficacy of topically applied drugs into the dermis. This split-area randomized prospective study aims to assess whether early utilization of the LADD procedure with tranexamic acid delivery followed by picosecond lasers can attenuate the PIH better than the utilization of picosecond lasers alone. Patients and methods: Ten post-traumatic cases of PIH in 10 patients (8 female and 2 male) with an average age of 34.2 ± 11.2 years were included in this clinical trial. Using block randomization to determine the treatment side, one side of each area of the PIH was separated from the midline into two halves belonging to the control and tranexamic acid groups. The half area of the tranexamic acid group was further topically applied with 10% tranexamic acid solution. This procedure was repeated every 6 weeks, four times in total. Results: The self-assessment of the hyperpigmentation and overall satisfaction of the treatment outcome were not significantly different between the treatment and control sides. Conclusions: This split-area study revealed that, compared with picosecond alone, there was no significant difference adopting tranexamic acid in LADD after nonablative fractional picosecond laser for PIH.

Comparison of Nd: YAG Laser and Combined Intense Pulsed Light and Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars: A Prospective Clinico-Histopathological Study

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic scars are fibroproliferative disorders, seen after burn, trauma, and/or surgery. We aimed to compare the clinical and histopathological results of 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and combined intense pulsed light and radiofrequency in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

Fifty patients with hypertrophic scars were included in this prospective, randomized study. Twenty-five patients were treated with Nd:YAG laser and 25 patients with combined intense pulsed light and radiofrequency (E-light). The scars were evaluated at baseline, during and at 3 months after the final treatment session using the Vancouver scar scale. Biopsy specimens from scars were obtained before, during, and 3 months after the final treatment session and were stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain, Masson's trichrome stain, and immunostaining procedures for collagen I, collagen III, and TGF-β1.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in the total Vancouver scar scale scores before and after the treatment in both groups (P < 0.001); however, a significant difference between both groups (P < 0.001), regarding the E-light, which showed better response than Nd:YAG laser. Hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining showed arrangement and thinning of collagen bundles and reduction in collagen density by in both groups, but the collagen bundles thinning and parallelism were more obvious in the E-light group. Significant decrease in the concentration of collagen I, collagen III, and TGF-β1 in the E-light group as compared with the laser group (P = 0.005, P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both modalities were successful in the treatment of hypertrophic scars; however, a significant improvement in the clinical and histopathological findings was detected with the E-light method.

Pulsed dye laser versus ablative fractional CO2 laser in treatment of old hypertrophic scars: Clinicopathological study

There is a continuous need to find out the best treatment for old hypertrophic scars (OHSs). Thirty patients with OHSs were included. Each scar was divided into right half treated with PDL (handpiece with a 7-mm spot, pulse duration of 1.5 ms and fluence of 6 J/cm² ) and left half treated with FrCo2 laser (15 W, spacing 800 μm, dwelling time 600 μs and stack 3) once every month for three sessions. Scars were assessed before and after treatment clinically by Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and histologically using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson trichrome and orcein stains. Both halves showed statistically significant improvement after treatment. However, there was no statistically significant difference in VSS between them (P = 0.176). FrCo2 laser showed more significant improvement in pliability and height (P^p = 0.017, P^h = 0,011), while, PDL showed more significant improvement in vascularity (P = 0.039) of OHSs. Both PDL and ablative FrCo2 laser were effective in the treatment of OHSs, however, FrCo2 laser was more effective in improving OHSs pliability, and height which are the main concern in OHSs.

Fractionally Ablative Er: YAG Laser Resurfacing for Thermal Burn Scars: a Split-Scar, Controlled, Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Thermal burn scars can have catastrophic impact on the quality of life and personal image, and over time can lead to profound physical and psychological debilitation. There are no established treatments to significantly improve burn scars.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of fractionally ablative Er:YAG resurfacing of mature burn scars.

METHODS

Sixteen subjects were enrolled and received 3 treatments of fractionally ablative Er:YAG resurfacing at monthly intervals. Twelve completed the study. Scars were scored with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) by the patient and physician before and after treatment. Blinded photographic analysis (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and blinded histologic analysis of tissue before and after treatment was also performed.

RESULTS

Significant Improvement in VSS scores were seen in all 12 patients, reported by patients and the evaluating physician alike. Photographic analysis demonstrated subjective improvement in all 12 patients. Histologically, there was significant improvement in collagen architecture and the number of vessels per high-power field. The treatments were tolerated well by patients, and 1 superficial skin infection occurred.

CONCLUSION

Fractionally ablative Er:YAG laser resurfacing is a safe and effective modality in the treatment of thermal burn scars with subjective and objective improvement as seen from the patient and physician.

Combination of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser and platelet-rich plasma treatment to improve hypertrophic scars: a retrospective clinical observational study

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scars are one of the main complications that affect the quality of life of patients after burns. Many methods have been shown to be effective in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, such as ablative fractional CO₂ laser (AFCL) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, there are few studies on the effect of the combined application of these measures. The purpose of this study was to explore the therapeutic effect of AFCL combined with PRP on hypertrophic burn scars.

METHODS

A retrospective clinical observation study was conducted on 50 patients with hypertrophic burn scars. The AFCL+PRP group included 31 patients who received AFCL combined with PRP treatment; the AFCL group included 19 patients who received AFCL treatment only. The University of North Carolina 4P Scar Scale (UNC4P) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores that were collected before each treatment were used as indicators of the effectiveness of the previous treatment. The scores recorded at the second, fourth and seventh months were analysed.

RESULTS

The demographic data of the 2 groups were not significantly different. Before treatment, there was no difference in the UNC4P and VSS scores between the 2 groups. There was a significant decline in the UNC4P and VSS total scores over 6 months in both groups (p < 0.05) and scores in the 2 groups were comparable after 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). UNC4P scores in the AFCL+PRP group decreased from a mean of 8.26 to 2.61 (p < 0.05) with a concomitant drop in VSS scores from a mean of 11.74 to 6.06 (p < 0.01). In the AFCL group UNC4P and VSS scores decreased from 7.68 to 4.63 (p < 0.05) and from 10.89 to 8.16 (p < 0.05), respectively. The sub-items of these 2 assessments were analysed and the results suggest that AFCL combined with PRP can comprehensively improve scarring.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that PRP is an effective adjunct for AFCL in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars and that the combination of PRP and AFCL proved to be more useful than AFCL alone. This combination may be a new and effective clinical practice for the treatment of scars. However, larger and higher-level clinical studies are still needed to determine its efficacy and possible mechanisms.

Before-after cohort study to assess the efficacy of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of pediatric hand scars

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser (AFXL) surgery in patients with pediatric hand scars. This study enrolled hand scar patients who received treatment in our hospital between May 2018 and April 2019. Patients were assigned to undergo AFXL surgery based on their personal intents and condition, whereas the fractional laser was used for stiffness and abnormal texture. Outcomes were as follows: hand function was evaluated using the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire; scar condition was evaluated using the Vancouver scar scale and UNC4P scar scale. Total 30 pediatric patients (mean age, 11.4 years) were eligible for the study and laser-treated scars were significantly improved in Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire from 52.30 ± 6.14 to 66.91 ± 6.43 (p < 0.001). Provider-rated Vancouver scar scale dropped from 8.80 ± 2.75 to 6.73 ± 2.52 (p < 0.001). Patient-reported UNC4P scar scale declined from7.07 ± 2.02 to 4.73 ± 1.31 (p < 0.001). AFXL surgery can significantly improve hand function and appearance of pediatric hand scars, suggesting its advantages over traditional methods of operative intervention.

Treating Hypertrophic Burn Scar With 2940-nm Er:YAG Laser Fractional Ablation Improves Scar Characteristics as Measured by Noninvasive Technology

Their group previously demonstrated high-patient satisfaction for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scar (HBS) with the erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, but this and other literature supporting the practice suffer from a common weakness of a reliance on subjective assessments by patients or providers. Herein, they sought to prospectively study the effects of Er:YAG fractional ablation on HBS using noninvasive, objective technologies to measure outcomes. Patients with HBS had identical regions of scar designated for treatment by the Er:YAG laser (TREAT) or to be left untreated (CONTROL). They prospectively collected scar measurements of TREAT and CONTROL regions preoperatively, 3 weeks, and 3 months after Er:YAG treatment. Scar measurements included viscoelastometry, transepidermal water loss, optical coherent tomography, and high-frequency ultrasound. Outcomes were measured for the aggregate difference between the TREAT group vs the CONTROL group, as well as within each group in isolation. Seventeen patients were seen preoperatively, followed by n = 15 at 3 weeks and n = 11 at 3 months. A mixed-model repeated measures analysis showed no significant effect of fractional ablation when comparing the overall TREAT group measurements with those of the CONTROL group. However, when considered as within-group measurements, TREAT scars showed significant improvement in viscoelastic deformity (P = .03), elastic deformity (P = .004), skin roughness (P = .05), and wrinkle depth (P = .04) after fractional ablation, whereas CONTROL scars showed no such within-group changes. HBS treated by the Er:YAG laser showed objective improvements, whereas no such changes were seen within the untreated scars over the same time frame.

Combination therapy of refractory keloid with ultrapulse fractional carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser and topical triamcinolone in Asians-long-term prevention of keloid recurrence

Keloid often recur after treatment, and recent studies in keloid management favor the combination therapy of laser-assisted drug delivery over monotherapy. Unfortunately, the previous researches lack long-term follow-up. In this prospective study, 41 individuals with refractory keloids underwent eight treatment sessions at 4 weeks intervals consisting of ultrapulse fractional carbon dioxide laser (UFCL), followed by postoperative application topical triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). Four follow-up moments were chosen, with follow-up of 24 months. The effects of combination therapy on scar pliability, thickness, relief, vascularization, surface area, pain, and itchiness were examined by means of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). 38 patients completed the full 24 months of follow-up after the whole treatment. The results reveal a fast and abiding improvement of keloid scars after the combination therapy. The mean keloid POSAS scores showed a decreasing trend in subsequent times. All POSAS components improved significantly between baseline and 24 months after start of therapy (P < .05). Long-term follow-up results demonstrate that combination keloid therapy using UFCL and tropical triamcinolone has overall significant improvement and low recurrence rate with a long-term stable results.

Laser treatment of specific scar characteristics in hypertrophic scars and keloid: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scarring and keloid can cause significant emotional and physical discomfort. Cosmetic appearance, functional limitations, pain and pruritus form a degree of impairment. While the etiology is not fully known, there is a wide array of treatment options, which include excision, radiation, cryotherapy, silicone gel sheeting, and intralesional injections. A relatively new modality is laser therapy. While results are promising, the number of different laser systems is substantial. This review evaluates the available evidence regarding outcomes on specific objective characteristics (i.e., erythema, pigmentation, height, and pliability) of the different laser systems.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Data on scar characteristics were extracted from scar scales Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and from objective measurement tools.

RESULTS

Heterogeneity was seen in a lot of aspects: maturity of scar, origin of scar, follow-up, and number of treatments. The fractional ablative lasers CO₂ 10,600 nm and Er:YAG 2940 nm were found to produce the best results regarding erythema, height, and pliability, while the flash lamp-pumped pulsed dye laser (PDL) 585 nm scored slightly below that.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser systems, and specifically the fractional ablative lasers CO₂ and Er:YAG, improved various characteristics of excessive scarring. An overview of preferred laser modality per scar characteristic is presented. Accounting for the methodological quality and the level of evidence of the data, future research in the form of randomized trials with comparable standardized scar scales is needed to confirm these results.

Using rational strategies for children's scars based on more than 5 years assessment after burn

BACKGROUND

Paediatric patients with scars after burn are regularly encountered. Discussion of rational strategies for management are of value. The objective of the study was to describe development and utilisation of strategies for paediatric burn scars up to five years after injury.

METHODS

We included 164 cases aged from 5 to 8 years old in our study; all had burn scar deformities.

RESULTS

Assessments were made up to December 31, 2019. The following strategies were used: sequential treatment, reconstruction based on facial aesthetic units, predicting the effect of surgery on development, releasing skin tension and application of photoelectric technology or other non-surgical measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Using rational strategies for paediatric burn scars is very important.

Impact of a Laser Service Line for Burn Scar on a Dedicated Burn OR's Flow and Productivity

Our group began performing erbium-YAG 2940 wavelength fractional resurfacing of burn scar in our burn center's dedicated burn operating room (OR) in January 2016. The impact of these procedures on the performance of a mature, dedicated burn OR is unknown. All burn OR cases performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 served as a pre-laser (PRE-LSR) historical control. A postintervention cohort of laser-only cases (LSR) performed between January 1, 2016 and August 17, 2016 was then identified. PRE-LSR and LSR cases were retrospectively reviewed for OR component times, and work relative value units (wRVU) billed. A total of 628 burn OR cases were done in 2015 (PRE-LSR), while 488 burn OR cases were done between January 1 and August 17, 2016. Of these 488, 59 cases were LSR (12.1%). Calculated on a monthly basis, significantly more cases were done per day in the LSR era (2.2 ± 0.4 cases/d) than PRE-LSR (1.6 ± 2.0 cases/d; P < .0001). The LSR group was significantly shorter than the PRE-LSR group for all OR component times (induction, prep, and procedure all P < .0001; transport out, P = .01; room turnover, P = .004). Aggregate OR component time was 79.2 ± 33.4 minutes for LSR and 157.5 ± 65.0 minutes for PRE-LSR (P < .0001). LSR yielded 6.9 ± 3.2 wRVU/h, while PRE-LSR generated 12.2 ± 8.9 wRVU/h (P < .0001). Despite significantly shorter OR component times and more cases being done per day, laser treatment of burn scar using a single 17108 Current Procedural Terminology code cuts wRVUs generated per hour in a mature burn OR roughly in half.

Laser Treatment of Traumatic Scars and Contractures: 2020 International Consensus Recommendations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is currently intense multidisciplinary interest and a maturing body of literature regarding laser treatments for traumatic scars, but international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the tremendous potential of laser techniques, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and promote wider patient access guided by future high-quality research.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international panel of 26 dermatologists and plastic and reconstructive surgeons from 13 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the laser treatment of traumatic scars. A three-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2018 and March 2019 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires and supplementary face-to-face meetings. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence, and the threshold for consensus was at least 80% concurrence among the panel members.

RESULTS

The manuscript includes extensive detailed discussion regarding a variety of laser platforms commonly used for traumatic scar management such as vascular lasers and ablative and non-ablative fractional lasers, special considerations such as coding and laser treatments in skin of color, and 25 summary consensus recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lasers are a first-line therapy in the management of traumatic scars and contractures, and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care after injury. Updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes, additional high-quality research, and patient access should reflect this status. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fractional CO2 laser ablation of porcine burn scars after grafting: Is deeper better?

INTRODUCTION

Fractional CO₂ lasers have been used in clinical settings to improve scarring following burn injury. Though used with increasing frequency, the appropriate laser settings are not well defined and overall efficacy of this therapy has not been definitively established. As it has been proposed that for thick hypertrophic scars proportionally greater fluence and thus deeper ablation into the scar tissue would be most effective, the goal of this study was to examine the role of ablation depth on scar outcomes in a highly-controlled porcine model for burn scars-after grafting.

METHODS

Properties of laser ablated wells were quantified on ex vivo pig skin as a function of laser energy (20, 70 or 150mJ). Full-thickness burn wounds were created on the dorsum of red Duroc pigs with the eschar excised and grafted with a split-thickness autograft meshed and expanded 1.5:1. After four weeks of healing, sites were treated with either 20, 70, or 150mJ pulse energy from a fractional CO₂ laser at 5% density or left untreated as a control. Sites were treated every four weeks with three total sessions. Scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and biomechanics were evaluated prior to each laser treatment at day 28, 56, and 83, as well as four weeks after the final laser treatment, day 112. Additional biopsies were collected at day 112 for gene expression analysis.

RESULTS

The depth of the laser ablated wells increased with increasing pulse energy while the width of the wells was smaller in the 20mJ group and not significantly different in the 70 and 150mJ groups. Scar properties (area, color, biomechanics) were not significantly altered by laser therapy at any of the laser energies tested versus controls. Average scar roughness was improved by laser therapy in a dose dependent manner with scars treated with 150mJ of energy having the smoothest surface; however, these changes were not statistically significant. Assessment of matrix metalloproteinase 9 gene expression showed a slight upregulation in scars treated with 70 or 150mJ versus control scars and scars treated with 20mJ pulse energy.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that the properties of the ablative well (depth and width) are not linearly correlated with laser pulse energy, with only a small increase in well depth at energies between 70 and 150mJ. Overall, the study suggests that there is little difference in outcomes as a function of laser energy. Fractional CO₂ laser therapy did not result in any statistically significant benefit to scar properties assessed by quantitative, objective measures, thus highlighting the need for additional clinical investigation of laser therapy efficacy with non-treated controls and objective measures of outcome.

Systematic Review on the Content of Outcome Measurement Instruments on Scar Quality

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Measurements of scar quality are essential to evaluate the effectiveness of scar treatments and to monitor scars. A large number of scar scales and measurement devices have been developed, which makes instrument selection challenging. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the content (ie, included items) of all outcome measurement instruments that measure scar quality in different types of scars (burn, surgical, keloid, and necrotizing fasciitis), and the frequency at which the instruments and included items are used.

Clinical effects of transparent facial pressure masks: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Severe facial hypertrophic scars are known to severely impact emotional well-being. Pressure therapy by means of transparent face masks has been used for almost 40 years, but evidence about the clinical effects remains sparse.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a summary on the efficacy of transparent face masks in the treatment of facial hypertrophic scars.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases through 1 January 2018. Articles describing the clinical effects of facial pressure therapy for remodeling the face after trauma or surgery with a validated tool were included. This review included studies of participants treated with facial hypertrophic scars, both minors and adults.

RESULTS

Three articles involving 33 patients were selected for inclusion. Two studies described statistically significant improvement in facial scars measured by durometer, ultrasound, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

CONCLUSIONS

Facial pressure masks have been shown to deliver significant improvement in facial scars, measured by both subjective and objective tools. However, only three studies could be included in this literature review. Also, because of considerable limitations of the studies, it remains difficult to draw substantial conclusions about the efficacy of transparent face masks.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This literature review provides a summary of the current evidence on the subjectively and objectively measured clinical effects of transparent face masks in the treatment of facial scars, highlighting the need for further research on this topic.

Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment Outcomes for Pediatric Hypertrophic Burn Scars

Carbon dioxide ablative fractional laser (CO2-AFL) therapy has not been widely adopted in pediatric burn care given limited outcomes literature and no established guidelines on laser treatment protocols. We present our experience to further elucidate the clinical role of CO2-AFL therapy for pediatric hypertrophic burn scars. We conducted a prospective cohort study of pediatric burn patients undergoing CO2-AFL treatment of hypertrophic, symptomatic burn scars at a tertiary care regional burn center during a 2-year period. Scars were assessed before each treatment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), a validated, subjective, comprehensive scar assessment tool. We treated 49 pediatric patients for a total of 180 laser sessions. Burn severity was full thickness (63.6%) or deep partial thickness (47.7%). Observer-rated POSAS scores revealed statistically significant improvements in pigment, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area after one treatment with continued improvement until the last laser session. Patient-rated POSAS revealed statistically significant improvements in color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity after laser treatments. Total POSAS improved from 89.6 ± 17.5 to 76.6 ± 16.8 (P < .0001) after one treatment with further improvement to 69.2 ± 14.9 (P < .0001) at the final laser session. We found convincing evidence that CO2-AFL therapy improves hypertrophic burn scars on both patient- and observer-rated scales confirming statistical and clinical significance to both providers and families. These findings demonstrate that CO2-AFL can improve hypertrophic burn scars in pediatric patients providing a lower risk alternative to invasive therapies and a more immediate, efficacious alternative to more conservative scar treatments.

Development of a Postburn Pruritus Relief Protocol

BACKGROUND

Postburn pruritus is a syndrome of stressful symptoms that is pervasive and occurs in over 90% of burn patients and continues for years after the burn has healed. Postburn pruritus is experienced by burn survivors that may require medical management and effective interventions.

PURPOSE

This article shows how to effectively relieve postburn pruritus by developing a postburn pruritus relief protocol.

DESIGN

A descriptive literature review was conducted, and relevant empirical articles written during the years 2000-2014 were appraised to create a postburn pruritus relief protocol. Twenty-six of 79 articles were selected using preestablished inclusion criteria: any age group experiencing burn-related pruritus after second- or third-degree burns. Databases were Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EBSCO, PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse, Google Scholar, and the American Burn Association website.

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol included both nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions that have been delineated for use and was developed to apply based on the healing stage: prehealing, healing, and posthealing.

Patient satisfaction after fractional ablation of burn scar with 2940nm wavelength Erbium-Yag laser

OBJECTIVE

Fractional laser therapy is a new treatment with potential benefit in the treatment of burn scars. We sought to determine patient satisfaction after burn scar treatment with the Erbium-Yag laser.

METHODS

We performed a telephone survey of all patients who underwent fractional resurfacing of burn scars with the Erbium-Yag 2940 wavelength laser at Parkland Hospital from 01/01/2016 to 05/01/2017. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction with their scars' after treatment characteristics on a scale from 1 (completely unsatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied). Subjects were also asked to assess their treatment response using the UNC 4P Scar Scale before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients underwent 156 treatments. A survey response rate of 77% (49/64) was seen (age: 36.8+21 years; surface area treated=435+326cm²; 35% of burn scars were >2 years old; mean scar age of 1.02+0.4 years). Overall, 46/49 (94%) of patients reported some degree of scar improvement after treatment. Patient satisfaction scores were 8.3+2.3. Number of laser treatments included: 1 (31%), 2 (33%), 3 (18%), 4(10%), >5 (8%). Treatment depth, scar age, and number of laser procedures were not significant predictors of satisfaction or UNC 4P Scar scores. The paired t-test showed a significant reduction on each of the UNC 4P Scar scale items (pain, pruritus, pliability, paresthesia). One subject reported that she felt that the laser treatment made her scar worse (2%).

CONCLUSION

Burn patients treated with the Erbium-Yag laser are highly satisfied with changes in their burn scars.

LIBERTI: A SMART study in plastic surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Laser treatment of burns scars is considered by some providers to be standard of care. However, there is little evidence-based research as to the true benefit. A number of factors hinder evaluation of the benefit of laser treatment. These include significant heterogeneity in patient response and possible delayed effects from the laser treatment. Moreover, laser treatments are often provided sequentially using different types of equipment and settings, so there are effectively a large number of overall treatment options that need to be compared. We propose a trial capable of coping with these issues and that also attempts to take advantage of the heterogeneous response in order to estimate optimal treatment plans personalized to each individual patient. It will be the first large-scale randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of laser treatments for burns scars and, to our knowledge, the very first example of the utility of a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial in plastic surgery.

METHODS

We propose using a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial design to investigate the effect of various permutations of laser treatment on hypertrophic burn scars. We will compare and test hypotheses regarding laser treatment effects at a general population level. Simultaneously, we hope to use the data generated to discover possible beneficial personalized treatment plans, tailored to individual patient characteristics.

RESULTS

We show that the proposed trial has good power to detect laser treatment effect at the overall population level, despite comparing a large number of treatment combinations. The trial will simultaneously provide high-quality data appropriate for estimating precision-medicine treatment rules. We detail population-level comparisons of interest and corresponding sample size calculations. We provide simulations to suggest the power of the trial to detect laser effect and also the possible benefits of personalization of laser treatment to individual characteristics.

CONCLUSION

We propose, to our knowledge, the first use of a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial in surgery. The trial is rigorously designed so that it is reasonably straightforward to implement and powered to answer general overall questions of interest. The trial is also designed to provide data that are suitable for the estimation of beneficial precision-medicine treatment rules that depend both on individual patient characteristics and on-going real-time patient response to treatment.

Clinical efficacy of utilizing Ultrapulse CO2 combined with fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of hypertrophic scars in Asians-A prospective clinical evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypertrophic scarring is seen regularly. Tissue penetration of laser energy into hypertrophic scars using computer defaults from some lasers may be insufficient and penetration not enough. We have developed a treatment with an interrupted laser "drilling" by the Ultrapulse CO₂ (Manual Fractional Technology, MFT) and, a second pass, with fractional CO₂ . The MFT with fractional CO₂ lasers to treat hypertrophic scars is evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 158 patients with hypertrophic scars had three sessions of MFT with fractional CO₂ laser at 3-month intervals. Evaluations made before and 6 months after the 3rd treatment: (1) the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), (2) the University of North Carolina (UNC) Scar Scale, and (3) a survey of patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

All data were analyzed using a t-test before and after treatment. The VSS score decreased from 9.35 to 3.12 (P<.0001), and the UNC Scar Scale score decreased from 8.03 to 1.62 (P<.0001). The overall satisfaction rate was 92%. No long-term complications occurred in the clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

The interrupted laser drilling by MFT and a fractional CO2 laser had profound effects on the hypertrophic scars treated. It works by increasing the penetration depth of the CO₂ laser in the scar tissue, exerting more precise effects on the hypertrophic scars. MFT combined with fractional CO₂ laser has the potential to be a major advance in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.

A multimodal approach to the treatment of extensive burn scars: a modified subcision technique for intralesional delivery of corticosteroid and 5-fluorouracil in combination with several procedural laser therapies; a case report

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are challenging to manage due to recurrence and often sub-optimal response to treatment. There is a lack of both definitive treatment standards and randomised controlled trials comparing therapeutic options. While a wide array of procedures has been utilised to improve traumatic burn scars, such interventions have been used with varying degrees of success. Some reported methods include intralesional injections of anti-inflammatory and anti-mitotic medications, laser-based therapy, topical therapies, cryotherapy, silicone gel sheeting, pressure therapy, radiotherapy and reconstructive surgery.

CASE

We report a case of extensive traumatic burn scarring on the head and neck successfully treated with a multimodal approach comprised of an infrequently used modified subcision technique to deliver alternating intralesional injections of anti-inflammatory (high-dose steroid) and anti-metabolite (5-flurouracil) concurrently with a series of laser (epilatory, vascular and fractional) treatments.

METHODS

Our treatment modality utilised a subcisional technique to deliver intralesional steroid and anti-metabolite medications directly into scar tissue to downregulate inflammation and inhibit collagen synthesis. Alexandrite, fractional and pulsed dye laser therapy was employed to improve skin texture, reduce dyschromia and reduce tissue burden of hypertrophic scar and keloid tissue, resulting in improved mobility and skin elasticity.

CONCLUSION

Our case supports a combined medical and procedural, subcisional, approach to successfully treat a patient with extensive hypertrophic scarring and keloid formation with associated hair entrapment after a head and neck burn.

Laser in the management of burn scars

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Burn scars are associated with significant morbidity ranging from contractures, pruritus, and disfigurement to psychosocial impairment. Traditional therapies include silicone gel, compression garments, corticosteroid injections, massage therapy, and surgical procedures, however, newer and advanced therapies for the treatment of burn scars have been developed. Lasers, specifically ablative fractional lasers, show potential for the treatment of burn scars.

METHODS

Both MeSH and keyword searches of the PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were performed and relevant articles were read in full for the compilation of this review.

RESULTS

Fifty-one relevant observational studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews published in English from 2006 to 2016 were reviewed and summarized.

CONCLUSION

Laser therapy is effective for the treatment of burn scar appearance, including measures such as pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and thickness. Ablative fractional laser therapy, in particular, shows significant potential for the release of contractures allowing for improved range of motion of affected joints. Patients may benefit from the use of lasers in the treatment of burn scars, and the safety profile of lasers allows the benefits of treatment to outweigh the risks. Laser therapy should be included in burn scar treatment protocols as an adjuvant therapy to traditional interventions.

Evidence-Based Scar Management: How to Improve Results with Technique and Technology

BACKGROUND

Scars represent the visible sequelae of trauma, injury, burn, or surgery. They may induce distress in the patient because of their aesthetically unpleasant appearance, especially if they are excessively raised, depressed, wide, or erythematous. They may also cause the patient symptoms of pain, tightness, and pruritus. Numerous products are marketed for scar prevention or improvement, but their efficacy is unclear.

METHODS

A literature review of high-level studies analyzing methods to prevent or improve hypertrophic scars, keloids, and striae distensae was performed. The evidence from these articles was analyzed to generate recommendations. Each intervention's effectiveness at preventing or reducing scars was rated as none, low, or high, depending on the strength of the evidence for that intervention.

RESULTS

For the prevention of hypertrophic scars, silicone, tension reduction, and wound edge eversion seem to have high efficacy, whereas onion extract, pulsed-dye laser, pressure garments, and scar massage have low efficacy. For the treatment of existing hypertrophic scars, silicone, pulsed-dye laser, CO2 laser, corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, and scar massage have high efficacy, whereas onion extract and fat grafting seem to have low efficacy. For keloid scars, effective adjuncts to excision include corticosteroids, mitomycin C, bleomycin, and radiation therapy. No intervention seems to have significant efficacy in the prevention or treatment of striae distensae.

CONCLUSION

Although scars can never be completely eliminated in an adult, this article presents the most commonly used, evidence-based methods to improve the quality and symptoms of hypertrophic scars, as well as keloid scars and striae distensae.