Anthropometric Effect of Mucoperiosteal Nostril Floor Reconstruction in Complete Cleft Lip

Septoplasty During Primary Cleft Lip Reconstruction: A Historical Perspective and Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Traditional surgical approaches excluded septoplasty at primary cleft lip reconstruction due to concerns about restricted nasal and midfacial growth. Modern opinion in the treatment of cleft lip has increasingly employed primary septoplasty; this scoping review and historical perspective aims to chronicle the evolution of septoplasty in patients born with cleft lip and palate and discuss current evidence.

METHODS

The historical perspective explicitly contrasts American and European perceptions of septoplasty in cleft lip deformity and the competing anatomical theories of the role of the septum on midfacial and nasal growth. For the scoping review, articles were extracted from Embase, PubMed, and Medline, as well as manual searches of reference lists. Results were compiled, grouped, and appraised by date, outcomes, and historical significance. Inclusion criteria consisted of children who underwent primary septoplasty for any indication and were followed up on outcomes of facial growth and nasal function. Literature reviews, opinion articles, case reports, guidelines, or studies not available in English or online were excluded.

RESULTS

Evolving anatomical theories relating to midfacial growth in the mid-late 20th century underpinned a progressive ideological shift on the safety and efficacy of septoplasty in children. This is supported by our scoping review, which included 23 articles mutually selected for inclusion by 2 blinded assessors. Several competing methods have been employed to measure endpoints on facial growth and nasal function, but generally indicate primary septoplasty is successful in improving nasal function and preserving midfacial growth.

CONCLUSION

Perceptions towards septoplasty on facial growth in the pediatric population have transformed significantly and suggest a growing acceptance of primary septoplasty techniques in patients born with a cleft lip.

Use of nasal retainers in the primary management of cleft lip: Current practices in France

BACKGROUND

The primary surgical management of cleft lip (CL) or cleft lip and palate (CLP) aims to achieve harmonious lip and nasal symmetry while ensuring satisfactory ventilation. Postoperative nasal retainers are commonly used, though both duration of use and conformer type used vary widely. This study aimed to establish an inventory of current practices for primary cheilorhinoplasty and nasal retainer use in France.

METHODS

A survey was sent to surgeons within and outside the French National Clefts and Facial Malformations (MAFACE) network. Questions focused on age when primary cleft closure is performed, retainer types used, conformation duration, and estimated patient compliance. Responses were collected March-July 2023.

RESULTS

Thirty-two surgeons responded with substantial variations in practices. For isolated CL, the age for primary cleft closure was 1-6 months, with 28 % performing surgery at 3 months, 12.5 % between 3 and 6 months, 44 % at 6 months. In cases with CLP, 63 % performed simultaneous surgery at 6 months. Two surgeons (6 %) reported preoperative nasoalveolar molding and 30 surgeons (94 %) reported postoperative nasal retainer use. Retainer type used immediately after surgery varied, with equal use of commercial retainers (31 %), silicone sheets (31 %), and in-house retainers (31 %). Duration of retainer prescription was in majority 3-4 months. Notably, 44 % of surgeons reported <70 % adherence rates for the recommended conformation duration, while 25 % reported very good compliance.

CONCLUSION

Primary cheilorhinoplasty and nasal conformation practices are highly diverse in France. Suboptimal patient compliance demonstrates the need for improved retainer design and strategies to enhance compliance.

"Primary Correction of the Cleft Nasal Septum: A Systematic Review"

Patients affected by cleft lip and palate have a characteristic nasal deformity; however, the treatment timeline varies amongst providers. There has been a shift from a more conservative approach to earlier intervention in order to allow for more normal development of the nose. Form, function, and future development all must be considered. For this reason, this investigation was undertaken to present the current literature available on the effects to all aspects of primary septoplasty in the cleft nasal deformity.

An initial list of 222 papers was identified, and it was determined that 16 papers fit the inclusion criteria. Studies were included in which the initial age of operation for the majority of patients was between 3 and 12 months and in which patients underwent septal repositioning at the time of cleft lip repair. These papers were all reviewed by a single author initially, and the results recorded. All results were then verified by a second author for accuracy and completeness.

Symmetry was found to be improved by primary septoplasty. Growth was not found to be impaired in any study; data was insufficient to indicate that growth was improved. Obstruction was improved as determined both by imaging, endoscopy, and patient survey. Finally, reoperation rates occurred at an acceptable rate not exceeding that of primary rhinoplasty without septoplasty.

Primary septoplasty leads to better aesthetic symmetry and function of the cleft nose without impairing growth. This change is maintained into adulthood often without the need for revisionary surgery.

Application of 3-Dimensional White-Light Scanning to Observe the Lip and Nose Morphology of Chinese Children

OBJECTIVE

To establish a database and study the growth and development of Chinese children's nasolabial units by 3-dimensional (3D) white-light scanning technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2018 to January 2019, 528 patients were selected preoperatively in our hospital, without cranial or maxillofacial deformities. The patients were placed in supine positions in a state of sedation, and the authors used a 3D white-light scanner to scan the children's faces to measure the 3D morphological structure of their nasolabial areas. The results were presented with Graphpad Prism 8.0.2 to explore correlations and analyze trends.

RESULTS

The selected Chinese children consisted of 356 males (67.4%) and 172 females (32.6%). All nasolabial subunits grew fastest at 0 to 2 years old and at a slower rate from 2 to 15 years old, whereas the relevant growth of different sex was similar among contemporaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional white-light scanning can quickly and accurately gain 3D imaging of nasolabial soft tissue to build a normal morphology database. Furthermore, every nasolabial subunit grows fastest at the age of 0 to 2 years.

Photogrammetric Outcomes of Primary Nasal Correction in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients: Early Childhood Results From a Single Surgeon's Experience

BACKGROUND

Concerns of nonlasting results and potential nasal growth damage precluded cleft nasal correction at the time of initial cleft lip repair. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip who underwent primary cleft nasal correction from 2010 to 2017 by the same surgeon was performed. The cleft-to-noncleft nostril height, width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nasal sill height, and nostril area ratios, as well as inner nostril height-to-width ratios were determined from standard basilar view photographs taken in different time points (T1, <3 months; T2, 3-12 months; T3, 12-36 months; and T4, >36 months after surgery). A 5-point visual analog scale (1 = worst, 5 = best) was used to assess each patient's nose appearance.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were identified (66.7% male, 51.3% with a complete cleft lip). Average visual analog scale scores T1-T4 were 3.88 ± 0.85, 3.72 ± 0.93, 3.54 ± 0.99, and 3.40 ± 0.71, respectively. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.61 to 0.94. A significant decrease [mean difference (SD)] was found for cleft-to-noncleft nostril width ratio [0.15 (0.18)] from T1 to T2, and an increase for one-fourth medial height ratio [-0.09 (0.07)] and for inner nostril height-to-width ratio in the noncleft side [-0.23 (0.25)] from T1 to T3. Thirteen patients required secondary surgical revision.

CONCLUSION

Based on photogrammetry, primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip achieved acceptable and stable outcomes during early childhood.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Primary Deformity and Longitudinal Changes following Primary Correction of the Nasal Foundation

BACKGROUND

Objective assessment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity and the longitudinal changes with treatment is critical for optimizing cleft care.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing cleft lip repair and foundation-based rhinoplasty were included (n = 102). Three-dimensional images preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age were assessed and compared to age-matched controls. Images were normalized to standard horizontal, craniocaudal, and anteroposterior axes.

RESULTS

Cleft subalare was similar in position relative to controls but was 1.6 mm retrodisplaced. Subnasale was deviated 4.6 mm lateral to midline and had the greatest displacement of any landmark. Noncleft subalare was displaced 2.3 mm laterally. Regression analysis with deviation of subnasale from the midline as a dependent variable revealed progressive lateral displacement of noncleft subalare, narrowing of noncleft nostril, and intercanthal widening. Surgery corrected nasal base displacements along all axes, resulting in landmark positions similar to controls. Symmetry of nasal base correction persisted at 5-year follow-up, with no recurrent cleft alar base retrusion, regardless of initial cleft type.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity may be "driven" by displacement of the anterior nasal spine and caudal septum. The cleft alar base is normal in position but retruded, whereas the noncleft alar base is displaced laterally. Changes with surgery involve anterior movement of the cleft alar base but also include medial movement of the noncleft alar base and columella. Symmetry of correction, including alar base retrusion, was stable over time and did not rely on alveolar bone grafting.

Craniofacial Anthropometry: Normative Data for Caucasian Infants

PURPOSE

Craniofacial anthropometry is a valuable tool for characterization of facial dysmorphology and evaluation of treatment outcomes. Databases of normal anthropometric ranges are limited for infants. The aim of this study is to establish normative data for craniofacial anthropometric measurements in Caucasian infants.

METHODS

This is a prospective cross-sectional study including Caucasian infants (≤12 months old) that were recruited from a pediatric medicine practice and Boston Children's Hospital. Infants with craniofacial deformities, trauma or operations were excluded. The sample was stratified by age (in months) into 4 groups: 0 to 3, 3.1 to 6, 6.1 to 9, and 9.1 to 12. Three dimensional (3D) photographs were obtained for all subjects. Forty-five standard anthropometric points were plotted, and 37 measurements were made on the 3D photographs. Two evaluators independently performed all measurements. One examiner repeated the measurements on 25% of the subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-rater and intra-rater agreement.

RESULTS

Thirty-three subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean age for the entire sample was 6.3 ± 3.0 months, and 17 subjects (52%) were female. The mean ages (months) for each group were: 1.9 ± 0.7 for group 1 (n = 6); 4.4 ± 0.7 for group 2 (n = 8); 7.5 ± 1.1 for group 3 (n = 11); and 9.9 ± 1.0 for group 4 (n = 8). Descriptive statistics are presented for each group. Inter- and intra-rater agreements were acceptable (ICC >0.6) for 21 anthropometric measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study generated normative craniofacial anthropometric measurements for Caucasian infants. These data can be used in the interpretation of measurements for research studies evaluating craniofacial anomalies in this population.