Cranial Reconstruction Using Autologous Bone and Methylmethacrilate

The role of autologous bone in cranioplasty. A systematic review of complications and risk factors by using stored bone

BACKGROUND

Autologous bone cranioplasty is associated with a high complication rate, particularly infections and bone resorption. Although there are studies on the incidence and risk factors for complications following autologous bone cranioplasty, the study design is typically limited to retrospective analysis with multiple statistical explorations in small cohorts from single centers. Thus, there is a need for systematic analysis of aggregated data to determine the rate and risk factors for cranioplasty complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and risk factors for complications after autologous bone cranioplasty.

METHODS

In this systemic review, we conducted a Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science search: 11,172 papers were identified. Duplicates were removed and only articles on complications following autologous bone cranioplasty between the years 2000 and 2022 were included. After title, abstract, and article screening, 132 papers were included for further analysis.

RESULTS

In total, the 132 studies are based on 13,592 patients (14960 implants). One third of the studies include patients with less than 3 months of postoperative follow-up. Complication management (flap removal, revision without flap removal, and conservative treatment) of infection, bone resorption, and hematoma/seromas are not reported in 19-30% of the studies. In the studies with defined complications management, the overall complication rate is 7.6% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [7.1-8.2]) for infection, 14.4% (95% CI [13.7-15.2]) for bone resorption with indication for reconstruction, and 5.8%, (95% CI 5.2-6.5) for hematoma/seromas. Factors such as younger age, an extended interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, the use of a fragmented bone implant, a larger implant size, and shunt treatment are linked to an increased risk of postoperative bone resorption.

CONCLUSION

The lack of consistent definitions of complications, variations in follow-up time, and small study cohorts limit the external validity of many studies. Overall, the rate of bone flap resorption that required reoperation is high, while the rate of infectious complications is comparable to synthetic implants. Thus, autologous bone should preferably be used in cases without strong risk factors for bone necrosis.

Frontotemporal Craniotomy for Clipping of Unruptured Aneurysm Using a Diamond-Coated Thread Wire Saw and Reconstruction Using Calcium Phosphate Cement without Metal Fixation

Metal fixation systems for cranial bone flaps cut by a drill are convenient devices for cranioplasty, but cause several complications. We use modified craniotomy using a fine diamond-coated threadwire saw (diamond T-saw) to reduce the bone defect, and osteoplasty calcium phosphate cement without metal fixation. We report our outcomes and tips of this method. A total of 78 consecutive patients underwent elective frontotemporal craniotomy for clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms between 2015 and 2019. The follow-up periods ranged from 13 to 66 months. The bone fixation state was evaluated by bone computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional CT (3D-CT). The diamond T-saw could minimize the bone defect. Only one wound infection occurred within 1 week postoperatively, and no late infection. No pain, palpable/cosmetically noticeable displacement of the bone flap, fluid accumulations, or other complications were observed. The condition of bone fixation and the cosmetic efficacy were thoroughly satisfactory for all patients, and bone CT and 3D-CT demonstrated that good bone fusion. No complication typical of metal fixation occurred. Our method is technically easy and safety, and achieved good mid-term bone flap fixation in the mid-term course, so has potential for bone fixation without the use of metal plates.

Materials Used in Cranial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty is a common neurological procedure with complication rates ranging from 20% to 50%. It is hypothesized that the risks of various complications are impacted by which material is used for cranioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate existing literature comparing rates of complications following cranioplasty using different materials including autologous bone, hydroxyapatite, methyl methacrylate (MMA), demineralized bone matrix, polyetheretherketone, titanium, or composite materials.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published between 2010 and 2020. After screening, 35 articles were included. Outcomes included infection, wound problems, poor cosmesis, overall complications, duration of surgery, and length of stay. For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to compare materials used.

RESULTS

The risk of infection was 1.62 times higher when MMA was used compared to autologous bone (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.45). Length of stay following cranioplasty was on average 3.62 days shorter when titanium was used compared autologous bone (95% CI -6.26 to -0.98). The networks constructed for other outcomes demonstrated moderate to substantial between-study heterogeneity, wide confidence intervals, and no significant differences between materials.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of existing literature on this topic is relatively poor, almost exclusively comprised of single-center retrospective studies. There is currently not strong enough evidence available to make comprehensive conclusions regarding the risk-profiles of various cranioplasty materials across multiple outcomes. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm the significant results found in this analysis and to further elucidate the differential risks of various cranioplasty materials.

The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future

BACKGROUND

Cranioplasty (CP) is associated with high complication rates compared to other common neurosurgical procedures. Several graft materials are used for CP, which may contribute to the high complication rates, but data in the literature regarding the influence of graft material on post-CP outcomes are inconsistent making it difficult to determine if, when, and to what extent the graft material impacts the rate of perioperative complications. There is an increased demand to identify and develop superior graft materials.

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the indications, risks, complications, and patient results associated with the use of different graft materials for cranial reconstructions.

DESIGN

A search through EBSCOhost was conducted using the keywords "craniectomy" or "decompressive craniectomy," "cranioplasty," and "materials." The search was limited to literature published in the English language from 2005 until the present. Ultimately, 69 articles were included in this review. Due to the heterogeneity of the study populations, results, statistical analyses, and collecting methods, no statistical analyses could be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Several graft materials have been adapted for use in cranial reconstructions with inconsistent results making it unclear if or when one material may be indicated over others. Advances in computer-aided design have led to improved patient-specific implants, but the ideal graft material is still being sought after in ongoing research efforts. Reviewing materials currently available, as well as those in clinical trials, is important to identify the limitations associated with different implants and to guide future research.