The Use of Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printed Surgical Models Enhances Plastic Surgery Resident Education in Craniofacial Surgery

3D-Printed "Jigsaw Puzzle" in Craniomaxillofacial Comminuted Fracture Reduction

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of comminuted and multiple facial fractures is challenging, as identifying the bone anatomy and restoring the alignment are complicated. To overcome the difficulties, 3D-printed "jigsaw puzzle" has been innovated to improve the surgical outcome. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of 3D-printed model in facial fracture restoration procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with traumatic craniomaxillofacial fractures treated at a single institution were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria included the presence of mandibular fractures, greenstick fractures, isolated fractures, and revision cases. Fine-cut (1-mm thick) computed tomography images of each patient were assembled into a 3D model for preoperative planning. Major fragments were segmented in virtual surgical planning, printed out with a 3D printer as "jigsaw puzzle" pieces, and assembled with plates and screws as in surgical rehearsals. We further matched our study group with a control group of patients who underwent the corresponding procedures to compare operative time.

RESULTS

Nine patients with craniomaxillofacial fractures were included in the study, including 2 patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures and 7 patients with multiple fractures. No remarkable postoperative complications, such as enophthalmus or optic nerve injury, that require additional or revision surgery were noted. The mean operative time was 391 and 435 minutes in the study and control groups, respectively. The t test results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can perform comprehensive preoperative planning, simulation, and obtain a real-time reference for facial bone reduction by using the 3D-printed "jigsaw puzzle" in multiple complicated craniomaxillofacial fractures.

Application of Virtual Planning and 3-Dimensional Printing Guide in Surgical Management of Craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to elaborate on the application of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3-dimensional printing (3DP) guides in the surgical management of craniosynostosis and compare their surgical outcomes with traditional surgical planning.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranial vault and cranio-orbital remodeling procedures for craniosynostosis was performed. VSP was accomplished by establishing a 3D model from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format computed tomography data. Patients' skull shapes were adjusted according to the age-matched standard skull; cutting and reconstruction guides were printed using a 3D printer. The change of anthropometric cranial indices, the so-called degree of correction, before and after the operation was evaluated to assess the surgical outcome. The traditional surgical planning group serves as the historical control group, and surgical outcomes were compared among propensity-matched patients in the VSP + 3DP group.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients with various presentations of craniosynostosis were operated on from 2005 to 2024, and 77 received surgery with VSP + 3DP. There were 35 matched pairs. Both had 17 male patients with similar age and body weight. A greater degree of correction was achieved in the VSP + 3DP group (9.75% vs. 6.36%, P value = 0.016) with less intraoperative blood loss (144.57 mL vs. 296.86 mL, P value < 0.001), shorter operation time (335.23 minutes vs. 348.34 minutes, P value = 0.501), and hospital stay (10.31 days vs. 12.63 days, P value = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

With VSP and 3DP guides, precise preoperative planning, efficient intra-operative correction of cranial deformity, and objective surgical outcome assessment are achieved in craniosynostosis operations.

Application of Computerized Surgical Planning in Craniosynostosis Surgery

Craniosynostosis, a medical condition characterized by premature fusion of one or multiple cranial sutures, has historically been treated through surgical correction. Computerized Surgical Planning (CSP) and three-dimensional (3D) modeling have gained significant popularity across craniofacial surgery. Through a collaborative effort between surgeons and engineers, it is now possible to virtually execute a surgical plan based on preoperative imaging using computed tomography scans. The CSP workflow involves several elements including virtual 3D modeling, CSP computer-aided surgical guide design, manufacturing of guides and templates, and intraoperative implementation. Through the gradual optimization of this workflow, it has been possible to achieve significant progress in the surgical process including improvements in the preoperative planning of complex craniosynostosis cases and reduction of intraoperative time. Furthermore, CSP and 3D modeling have had a positive impact on surgical simulation and residency training, along with patient education and counseling. This article summarizes the CSP workflow in the treatment of craniosynostosis and the implications of this treatment modality on medical trainee education and patient management.

Design and Validation of a 3D Printed Cranio-Facial Simulator: A Novel Tool for Surgical Education

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ability of current 3D printing technology to generate a craniofacial bony and soft tissue anatomical model for use in simulating the performance of a fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) osteotomy and then to further assess the value of the model as an educational tool.

DESIGN

Anatomic models were designed with a process of serial anatomic segmentation/design, 3D printing, dissection, and device refinement. A validation study was conducted with 5 junior and 5 senior plastic surgery residents. The validation study incorporated a multiple-choice Knowledge Assessment test (KA), an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical skills (OSATs), a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale (MiSSES). We compared the scores of both the junior and senior residents and compared junior resident scores, before and after viewing a lecture/demonstration.

RESULTS

MiSSES showed high face validity with a score of 85.1/90, signifying high satisfaction with the simulator learning experience. Simulation and the lecture/demonstration improved the junior resident average KA score from 5.6/10 to 9.6/10 (P = .02), OSATs score from 32.4/66 to 64.4/66 (P < .001) and GRS score from 13.9/35 to 27.5/35 (P < .001). The senior residents OSATs score of 56.3/66 was higher than the pre-lecture juniors (32.4/66) (P < .001), but lower than the post-lecture juniors (64.4/66) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We have successfully fabricated a 3D printed craniofacial simulator capable of being used as an educational tool alongside traditional surgical training. Next steps would be improving soft tissue realism, inclusion of patient and disease specific anatomy and creation of models for other surgical specialties.

3D-printed model for gingival flap surgery simulation: Development and pilot test

INTRODUCTION

To assess the feasibility of a realistic model for learning oral flaps using 3D printing technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mould was designed to reproduce the mandibular gingival mucosa, and a mandibular model was created using a three-dimensional printer for training undergraduate students to perform gingival flaps. After a short interview about its use, the participants were asked to use the simulator and provide feedback using a 5-point Likert questionnaire.

RESULTS

The 3D-printed oral surgery flap training model was practical and inexpensive. The model was very realistic, educational and useful for hands-on training.

CONCLUSIONS

3D printing technology offers new possibilities for training in dental treatments that are currently difficult to replicate. The use of this simulator for oral flap surgery was well-received and considered promising by the participants.

3D Printing and Surgical Simulation for Management of Large and Giant Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

Tissue expansion with subsequent adjacent tissue transfer is often the preferred and sometimes the only option for reconstruction of large and giant congenital melanocytic nevi. Successful reconstruction with maximal efficiency and optimal aesthetic outcome requires careful planning of the tissue transfer, which itself requires careful selection of the tissue expander size and positioning. Unfortunately, there is little opportunity to gain experience in these skills due to the rarity of this condition. In situations where there is a rare condition that requires a complex technical procedure with much interoperative decision-making, surgical experience can be supplemented with the use of surgical simulation. In this article, we report on the use of three-dimensional patient imaging, three-dimensional printing, and surgical simulation for planning the reconstruction of large and giant congenital melanocytic nevi. We describe how this technology allows us to simulate multiple different approaches to expander placement and adjacent tissue transfer. We also describe how these simulations can be used to create cutting guides to guide final incision design and reduce intraoperative decision-making. Finally, we discuss how these models can be used to educate patients and families about the process and outcomes of nevus excision and reconstruction.

The Innovation Press: A Primer on the Anatomy of Digital Design in Plastic Surgery

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional (3D) printing continues to revolutionize the field of plastic surgery, allowing surgeons to adapt to the needs of individual patients and innovate, plan, or refine operative techniques. The utility of this manufacturing modality spans from surgical planning, medical education, and effective patient communication to tissue engineering and device prototyping and has valuable implications in every facet of plastic surgery. Three-dimensional printing is more accessible than ever to the surgical community, regardless of previous background in engineering or biotechnology. As such, the onus falls on the surgeon-innovator to have a functional understanding of the fundamental pipeline and processes in actualizing such innovation. We review the broad range of reported uses for 3D printing in plastic surgery, the process from conceptualization to production, and the considerations a physician must make when using 3D printing for clinical applications. We additionally discuss the role of computer-assisted design and manufacturing and virtual and augmented reality, as well as the ability to digitally modify devices using this software. Finally, a discussion of 3D printing logistics, printer types, and materials is included. With innovation and problem solving comprising key tenets of plastic surgery, 3D printing can be a vital tool in the surgeon's intellectual and digital arsenal to span the gap between concept and reality.

Three-Dimensional Photography and Computer Modeling as a Reconstructive Surgical Training Tool

Background

Reconstructive surgery operations are often complex, staged, and have a steep learning curve. As a vocational training requiring thorough three-dimensional (3D) understanding of reconstructive techniques, the use of 3D photography and computer modeling can accelerate this learning for surgical trainees.

Objectives

The authors illustrate the benefits of introducing a streamlined reconstructive pathway that integrates 3D photography and computer modeling, to create a learning database for use by trainees and patients alike, to improve learning and comprehension.

Methods

A computer database of 3D photographs and associated computer models was developed for 35 patients undergoing reconstructive facial surgery at the Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. This was used as a training and teaching tool for 20 surgical trainees, with an MCQ questionnaire assessing knowledge and a Likert scale questionnaire assessing satisfaction with the understanding of core reconstructive techniques, given before and after teaching sessions. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for trainee knowledge and Wilcoxon rank sum test for trainee satisfaction.

Results

Trainee (n = 20) knowledge showed a statistically significant improvement, P < .01, as did trainee satisfaction, P < .05, after a teaching session using 3D photography and computer models for facial reconstruction.

Conclusions

Three-dimensional photography and computer modeling are useful teaching and training tools for reconstructive facial surgery. The authors advocate the implementation of an integrated pathway for patients with facial defects to include 3D photography and computer modeling wherever possible, to develop internal databases for training trainees as well as patients. This algorithm can be extrapolated to other aspects of reconstructive surgery.

Level of Evidence 5

Three-dimensional Medical Printing and Associated Legal Issues in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) represents an emerging field of surgery. 3DP can facilitate the plastic surgeon's workflow, including preoperative planning, intraoperative assistance, and postoperative follow-up. The broad clinical application spectrum stands in contrast to the paucity of research on the legal framework of 3DP. This imbalance poses a potential risk for medical malpractice lawsuits. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to summarize the current body of legal literature on medical 3DP in the US legal system. By combining the promising clinical use of 3DP with its current legal regulations, plastic surgeons can enhance patient safety and outcomes.

Computer-assisted fronto-facial monobloc advancement and facial bipartition for Pfeiffer's Syndrome: the surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

In the Pfeiffer syndrome, several corrections are required to correct the facial retrusion, the maxillary deficiency or even the hypertelorism. The fronto-facial monobloc advancement (FFMA) and the facial bipartition (FB) are the gold standard surgeries. We present the correction of this deformity using a simultaneous computer-assisted FFMA and FB.

TECHNICAL NOTE

The 3D surgical planning defined the virtual correction and the bone cutting guide in view of the FFMA and the FB. Coronal and intraoral approaches were combined to perform the osteotomies. Four internal distractors were also placed for the postoperative distraction osteogenesis.

DISCUSSION

Computer-assisted surgery is helpful and a reliable option for the management of complex facio-craniosynostosis such as hypertelorism and fronto-facial retrusion.

Emerging simulation technologies in global craniofacial surgical training

The last few decades have seen an exponential growth in the development and adoption of novel technologies in medical and surgical training of residents globally. Simulation is an active and innovative teaching method, and can be achieved via physical or digital models. Simulation allows the learners to repeatedly practice without the risk of causing any error in an actual patient and enhance their surgical skills and efficiency. Simulation may also allow the clinical instructor to objectively test the ability of the trainee to carry out the clinical procedure competently and independently prior to trainee's completion of the program. This review aims to explore the role of emerging simulation technologies globally in craniofacial training of students and residents in improving their surgical knowledge and skills. These technologies include 3D printed biomodels, virtual and augmented reality, use of google glass, hololens and haptic feedback, surgical boot camps, serious games and escape games and how they can be implemented in low and middle income countries. Craniofacial surgical training methods will probably go through a sea change in the coming years, with the integration of these new technologies in the surgical curriculum, allowing learning in a safe environment with a virtual patient, through repeated exercise. In future, it may also be used as an assessment tool to perform any specific procedure, without putting the actual patient on risk. Although these new technologies are being enthusiastically welcomed by the young surgeons, they should only be used as an addition to the actual curriculum and not as a replacement to the conventional tools, as the mentor-mentee relationship can never be replaced by any technology.

Three-dimensional printing and craniosynostosis surgery

OVERVIEW

The goal of this study was to review the current application and status of three-dimensional printing for craniosynostosis surgery.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE databases for studies published between 2010 and 2020. All studies demonstrating the utilization of three-dimensional printing for craniosynostosis surgery were included.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were ultimately selected. This includes studies demonstrating novel three-dimensional simulation and printing workflows, studies utilizing three-dimensional printing for surgical simulation, as well as case reports describing prior experiences.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of three-dimensional printing into the domain of craniosynostosis surgery has many potential benefits. This includes streamlining surgical planning, developing patient-specific template guides, enhancing residency training, as well as aiding in patient counseling. However, the current state of the literature remains in the validation stage. Further study with larger case series, direct comparisons with control groups, and prolonged follow-up times is necessary before more widespread implementation is justified.

Three-dimensional Printing in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications

Background

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is a rapidly advancing tool that has revolutionized plastic surgery. With ongoing research and development of new technology, surgeons can use 3DP for surgical planning, medical education, biological implants, and more. This literature review aims to summarize the currently published literature on 3DP's impact on plastic surgery.

Methods

A literature review was performed using Pubmed and MEDLINE from 2016 to 2020 by 2 independent authors. Keywords used for literature search included 3-dimensional (3D), three-dimensional printing (3DP), printing, plastic, surgery, applications, prostheses, implants, medical education, bioprinting, and preoperative planning. All studies from the database queries were eligible for inclusion. Studies not in English, not pertaining to plastic surgery and 3DP, or focused on animal data were excluded.

Results

In total, 373 articles were identified. Sixteen articles satisfied all inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were further analyzed by the authors. Most studies were either retrospective cohort studies, case reports, or case series and with 1 study being prospective in design.

Conclusions

3DP has consistently shown to be useful in the field of plastic surgery with improvements on multiple aspects, including the delivery of safe, effective methods of treating patients while improving patient satisfaction. Although the current technology may limit the ability of true bioprinting, research has shown safe and effective ways to incorporate biological material into the 3D printed scaffolds or implants. With an overwhelmingly positive outlook on 3DP and potential for more applications with updated technology, 3DP shall remain as an effective tool for the field of plastic surgery.

Surgical training 2.0: A systematic approach reviewing the literature focusing on oral maxillofacial surgery - Part I

PURPOSE

Many technologies are emerging in the medical field. Having an overview of the technological arsenal available to train new surgeons seems very interesting to guide subsequent surgical training protocols.

METHODS

This article is a systematic approach reviewing new technologies in surgical training, in particular in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This review explores what new technologies can do compared to traditional methods in the field of surgical education. A structured literature search of PubMed was performed in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. The articles were selected when they fell within predefined inclusion criteria while respecting the key objectives of this systematic review. We looked at medical students and more specifically in surgery and analysed whether exposure to new technologies improved their surgical skills compared to traditional methods. Each technology is reviewed by highlighting its advantages and disadvantages and studying the feasibility of integration into current practice.

RESULTS

The results are encouraging. Indeed, all of these technologies make it possible to reduce the learning time, the operating times, the operating complications and increase the enthusiasm of the students compared to more conventional methods. The start-up cost, the complexity to develop new models, and the openness of mind necessary for the integration of these technologies are all obstacles to immediate development. The main limitations of this review are that many of the studies have been carried out on small numbers, they are not interested in acquiring knowledge or skills over the long term and obviously there is a publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Surgical education methods will probably change in the years to come, integrating these new technologies into the curriculum seems essential so as not to remain on the side. This first part therefore reviews, open field camera, telemedicine and 3D printing. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO.

Modeling Medical Education: The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Models on Medical Student Education in Plastic Surgery

PURPOSE

Trainee exposure to craniofacial pathology can be limited due to rare disease presentation, revealing a need for tools that assist in visualizing complex 3D pathologic anatomy. 3D-printed models show potential as a useful aid, allowing for physical manipulation and hands-on experience. This study investigates their educational value in teaching craniofacial pathology and surgical repair.

METHODS

Forty-four medical students randomly assigned to a control group or model group were given a PowerPoint presentation-based module on craniosynostosis and surgical repair. The model group was also provided with 3D-printed models of sagittal, metopic, and bicoronal synostosis, created using patient-specific preoperative computed tomography data. A survey using the Likert scale evaluated participants' learning experience. Pre- and postmodule scores on a 10-question multiple choice quiz were recorded.

RESULTS

The survey showed that students in the model group reported better understanding of the anatomy (4.86 ± 0.15 versus 4.26 ± 0.22; P = 0.0001) and visualization of the pathology (4.76 ± 0.23 versus 4.26 ± 0.25; P = 0.0064), gaining an improved understanding of surgical approach (4.38 ± 0.37 versus 3.83 ± 0.29; P = 0.0266), which was more effectively taught (4.24 ± 0.33 versus 3.30 ± 0.38; P = 0.0007) with the 3D-printed models. The mean pre- and post-module quiz scores between groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

3D-printed models demonstrated an improved learning experience for medical students as shown by survey. These findings suggest a potential use for 3D-printed models in medical education of craniofacial pathology and surgery.

Use of a virtual 3D anterolateral thigh model in medical education: Augmentation and not replacement of traditional teaching?

There is a pressing need for simulated forms of medical, and in particular, anatomical learning. Current modalities of teaching are limited to either traditional 2-dimensional forms of learning, such as textbook, research papers and lectures, or more costly 3-dimensional modes including cadaveric dissection. Despite the overwhelmingly 3-dimensional nature of plastic surgery, virtual 3D models are limited. Here, we provide the first description of the development and utilisation of a virtual 3D flap model in medical education in the undergraduate curriculum. Methods and results: A 3D anterolateral (ALT) model was developed with close integration of specialists in simulation and visualisation, anatomists and clinicians, allowing 'virtual dissection' of the anatomy of the ALT flap. This was utilised in a B.Sc. Anatomy undergraduate course in 2017/18 and 2018/19. Student feedback noted an overwhelming preference for the 3D model (74%) as the first choice of educational methodology, versus lectures (26%), textbooks (0%) and research papers (0%) (p = 0.0035). Extraneous cognitive load may be reduced with 3D models, with students rating these as easier to learn from than textbook or research papers (p = 0.00014 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the perceived ease of learning between 3D models and lectures. Conclusions: This study highlights a striking user preference for virtual 3D models as compared to for traditional teaching methods. Nonetheless, 3D models are likely to enhance rather than replace lectures, with this study suggesting that teaching by experts is likely to remain an essential part of medical education.