Modification of Rhytidectomy: Stepped Lift of the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System

Age Reduction After Face-Lift Surgery in Chinese Population: An Outcome Study Using Artificial Intelligence and Objective Observer-Based Assessment

BACKGROUND

The literature is replete with favorable face-lift results, yet the objective facial rejuvenation outcome measures in Chinese women have remained poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to objectively evaluate the apparent age (AA) reduction in Chinese women following face-lift by artificial intelligence (AI) and objective observers.

METHODS

Standardized pre- and postoperative (1-year) images of 48 patients undergoing face-lift procedures were analyzed by AI to estimate AA. Additionally, 10 blinded, naive observers viewed each patient's images and assessed AA. The accuracy of AA and reduction in AA were evaluated and compared between the two methods. FACE-Q surveys were employed to measure patient-reported facial esthetic outcomes.

RESULTS

The AI demonstrated higher precision than the observers in age estimation, with a mean absolute error of 3.34 years and 90% Pearson correlation. AA reduction generated by AI was significantly lower than that by observers, with a mean reduction of 3.75 ± 3.93 and 4.51 ± 1.20, respectively (p < 0.05). However, both methods showed less AA reduction than patient self-appraisal (- 7.3 years). Improvements in facial rejuvenation following face-lift surgery is relevant to the patient's preoperative aging status. Patients whose pre-AA was greater than chronological age (CA) became "back to normal," while those whose pre-AA was less than CA became "turning back the clock."

CONCLUSION

The utilization of AI could provide objective, evidence-based data in the field of face-lift surgery. As a simple, complete, and time-sparing method, AI is expected to be routinely used in clinical trials and practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis of Reconstructive Rhytidectomy: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Patient Outcomes

Reconstructive rhytidectomy, commonly known as facelift surgery, is a prominent cosmetic procedure aimed at rejuvenating facial appearance by addressing signs of aging. This paper critically evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques involved in rhytidectomy, including the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), deep plane facelift, and subperiosteal approaches. This systematic review of recent literature highlights key outcomes such as scar quality, postoperative pain management, and patient satisfaction. While the techniques demonstrate significant improvements in aesthetic results and patient quality of life, they also present risks including complications, dissatisfaction with outcomes, and the financial burden of surgery. Future directions indicate a trend toward minimally invasive approaches, integration of regenerative medicine, and personalized surgical planning, aiming to optimize results and minimize risks.

Evolution of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Facelift Techniques: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Complications and Outcomes

Background

Facelift procedures are a popular method of facial rejuvenation. The most common technique is superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, with several variations. However, the optimal approach remains unclear. This review analyzed previous studies to compare SMAS facelift techniques, their outcomes, and complication rates.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar electronic databases in September 2022. The search included studies published from January 2000 to September 2022 using keywords such as "facelift," "complications," and "outcomes."

Results

This review examined 27 selected studies that evaluated 6 SMAS facelift techniques. The studies involved 6086 patients in total, over 85% of who were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. The complication rates varied depending on the technique used, with the SMAS flap and composite SMAS technique having the highest (5.75%) and lowest (0.05%) complication rates, respectively. The most common complications were temporary facial nerve injury (0.85%) and skin necrosis (0.41%). To date, only one case of permanent facial nerve injury has been reported.

Conclusions

On the basis of our findings, SMAS facelift techniques achieve high patient satisfaction rates, with complication rates that vary by technique. The composite SMAS technique showed the lowest complication rates, whereas the SMAS flap showed the highest rate. However, some studies have not reported all complications, making it difficult to determine the best approach. Therefore, future studies are required to identify the most aesthetically pleasing technique with the lowest complication risk.

Best Practices for FACE-Q Aesthetics Research: A Systematic Review of Study Methodology

BACKGROUND

The FACE-Q Aesthetics module is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that evaluates perspectives on facial aesthetic treatments. Improper administration and poor study methodology can compromise the validity and interpretation of this PROM.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review sought to evaluate the administration and scoring of the FACE-Q Aesthetics scales within the literature.

METHODS

A search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed on December 20, 2022, with the assistance of a health-research librarian (CRD42022383676). Studies that examined facial aesthetic interventions using the FACE-Q Aesthetics module as a primary or secondary outcome measure were included for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 114 studies included. The Face Overall (n = 52, 45.6%), Psychological (n = 45, 39.4%), and Social (n = 43, 37.7%) scales were most frequently reported. Errors in FACE-Q administration were identified in 30 (26.3%) studies. The most common error was the presentation of raw ordinal scores rather than the converted Q score (n = 23). Most studies reported a time horizon for their primary analysis (n = 76, 66.7%); however, only 4 studies provided a rationale for this selection. Sample size calculations for the primary outcome were rarely performed (n = 9, 7.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

There continues to be limitations in PROM administration and the quality of articles that report FACE-Q Aesthetic scale data. The authors suggest that future investigators using the FACE-Q refer to the User's Guide regarding administration and scoring of this scale, report a rationale for the study time horizon, and provide an a priori sample size calculation for the primary outcome of interest.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Relapse After Facelift

BACKGROUND

Early relapse is an adverse outcome of facelift surgery. The rate of early relapse is an indirect measure of the longevity and efficacy of facelift techniques. However, early relapse after facelift is ill-defined, under-evaluated, and under-reported, and literature data on the subject are dispersed. In this systematic review, we aimed to analyze facelift studies using relapse-related outcomes (RROs). Our secondary aim was to highlight the importance of early relapse as an essential outcome measure.

METHODS

The study design was a systematic review of the English literature and meta-analysis of RROs after facelift surgery. RROs that occurred within the first 2 years after surgery were considered "early". Performance, analysis, and reporting were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic search was conducted using the PubMed database as of February 2020. Initial screening was performed using the keywords "facelift", "rhytidectomy", "surgical rejuvenation", "face lift", "rhytidoplasty", and "facial rejuvenation". Articles were excluded by using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

RROs were reported only in 4.4% (19/433) of the papers that underwent full-text review. The frequency of RROs ranged between 0.2 and 50% among facelift papers. The weighted median rate of RROs after facelift surgery was found to be 2.4% in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research on preventive measures will be successful upon acknowledgment of the actual prevalence of this problem. Consensus on its definition and objective criteria for its diagnosis are required for further progress.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Advances in Face-Lift Surgical Techniques: 2016-2021

BACKGROUND

Face-lift surgery is the most crucial and constantly evolving technique of facial rejuvenation. Periodic reviews synthesizing the latest face-lift techniques may help surgeons sharpen their surgical procedures.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted of the PubMed databases using the search term "face lift" and "rhytidectomy." Articles reporting rhytidectomy of the forehead/brow, midface, lower face, and neck were included. Sixty-nine articles were selected after independent screening by three of the authors. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine scale was used for evaluating evidence level.

RESULTS

Of the 69 candidate articles, 10 studies (15%) reported techniques of neck lifting; 10 studies (15%) introduced techniques of endoscopic brow lifting; 7 studies (10%) pertained to brow lifting without endoscopic techniques. The most frequently reported locations of rhytidectomy were the brow/forehead (20%), neck (19%), and face-neck (17%). Additionally, articles regarding Asian face-lifts (14%) have been increasing. The evidence level of the articles was generally low, with only 10 articles assessed as level 1-3 with 59 articles as level 4-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Face-lift articles with high-level evidence are still lacking. Prominently, forehead lifting and neck lifting have become upward trends of rhytidectomy in recent years, and the techniques of short-scar face-lift have been more valued.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcome Measurement of Beauty and Attractiveness of Facial Aesthetic Rejuvenation Surgery

ABSTRACT

Aesthetic plastic surgery is a most unusual and unique subspecialty. Unlike other medical and surgical specialties driven primarily by objective medical diagnosis and outcome, aesthetic surgery is patient driven; it represents a special exercise in professional competence by adapting objective medical standards to a mostly subjective field. Given the subjectivity of facial beauty and of the projected aesthetic intervention outcome, in addition to be able to determine beauty of the final result as precisely and objectively as possible, it is also essential to be able to assess patient's satisfaction. However, lack of standardized facial measurements and clear definition of aesthetic outcome and beauty are still major obstacles preventing real change in the consultation dynamics to help better serve patients' expectations. Because of the tremendous increase in demand for all types of facial aesthetic procedures, an objective understanding of aesthetics and beauty is becoming of utmost importance. Recognition of the importance of science and evidence-based medicine is long overdue in our specialty. This study aims at identifying the most recently available evidence-based measures to quantitatively assess beauty and measure outcome of rhytidoplasty that can be useful in everyday aesthetic practice.

Special Considerations in Chinese Face-Lift Procedure: Insights From a 15-Year Experience of 1026 Cases

BACKGROUND

There is extensive literature on different face-lift techniques; however, few articles published in the English language address the particularities of the face-lift for Chinese patients. Because of differences in facial anatomy, facial aging, and patient expectations, facial rejuvenation procedures for Chinese patients can be quite different from those of White patients.

METHODS

The study includes 1026 consecutive primary face-lift cases performed by the senior author (D.Y.) from 2006 to 2019. Of these, 1010 patients were female and 16 were male. The average age of the patient at the time of primary face-lift was 40.5 years. The face-lift procedures included midface lift in 108 cases, midface and lower-face lift in 882 cases, and midface and lower-face lift with brow lift in 36 cases. All patients received superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) treatment, in the form of lateral SMASectomy in 607 cases, high-SMAS technique in 84 cases, modified high-SMAS short-scar technique in 108 cases, minimal access cranial suspension technique in 38 cases, and modified minimal access cranial suspension technique in 189 cases. Photographs of patients were analyzed to assess persistent features of facial aging. Complications such as hematoma, skin slough, infection, and nerve injury were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Most patients obtained consistently good results with minimal risk and complications. All surgical techniques discussed were safe and reproducible, providing various options for surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Special attention should be taken when planning a facial rejuvenation procedure for Chinese patients. Anatomic variations dictate a greater emphasis on the management of tissue ptosis, particularly regarding lateral brow descent and malar fat pad descent. In our practice, various face-lift techniques can produce excellent results. Surgeons must adopt a technique that serves patients well and is, ideally, safe, consistent, easily reproducible, and applicable to various anatomic problems. In addition, every surgery is customized to the patient's anatomy and concerns. Therefore, the surgeon must adopt individualized technique according to the needs and desires of each patient.