Patient Satisfaction After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Zygomatic Bone Fractures

Does More Invasive Surgery Result in Higher Patient Satisfaction? A Long-Term Follow-Up of 136 Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Study Design

Retrospective with follow-up.

Objective

To evaluate the long-term satisfaction of surgically treated patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures in relation to the use of internal fixation, number of fixation points, and orbital floor (OF) reconstruction. Secondary objectives were to describe the use of antibiotics and post-operative infections.

Methods

Patients with unilateral ZMC fractures between 2007-2018 and treatment with either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or closed reduction (CR) were identified from medical records and invited to follow-ups between 2018-2020. Patients were examined, photographed, and completed a questionnaire. A review panel of 3 experienced surgeons evaluated photographs and computed tomography (CT) scans pre- and post-surgery.

Results

The study sample consisted of 136 patients (108 ORIF, 28 CR) with a median follow-up time of 76 months. Patient satisfaction of surgical outcome was high (97.8%), with no significant differences in relation to the use of internal fixation, number of fixation points, or OF reconstruction. Dissatisfaction was primarily related to hypoesthesia. On post-operative CT scans, malar asymmetry was more often predicted in patients with 1-point fixations. On questionnaires and photographs, malar asymmetry was more common in patients with 3-point fixations. Prophylactic antibiotics had no effect on the rate of post-operative infections.

Conclusions

Patient satisfaction was not influenced by internal fixation, number of fixation points, or OF reconstruction. Selected ZMC fractures can be treated with less invasive approaches. Caution should be observed when predicting long-term malar asymmetry on post-operative CT scans. The findings of this study highlight the importance of a rational and ethical use of surgery.

Treatment of Sagittal Fracture of the Zygomatic Arch Root

A sagittal fracture at the temporal root of the zygomatic arch (ZAR) often occurs as a component of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. However, this area is difficult to access, and anchorage is limited due to the unstable structure around it. Therefore, a preauricular approach using single-screw fixation is proposed, and this study reports its results and usefulness. Forty-four patients with sagittal fractures of ZAR occurring with ZMC fractures were evaluated from 2012 to 2021. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed on all patients with ZMC fractures. Closed reduction using Dingman incision and external finger pressure in group A (indirect approach; 30 patients) and single-screw fixation using a preauricular approach in group B (direct approach; 14 patients) were performed to address sagittal fractures in ZAR. For single-screw fixation, the additional mean operation time was 11.34±3.25 minutes. On postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography and plain radiographs, group B showed more accurate reduction and less deformity and trismus ( P <0.05). Moreover, a normal diet was initiated more quickly in group B than in group A ( P <0.05). Some cases in group A showed nonunion or malunion. This study revealed that a direct approach (group B) toward sagittal fractures of ZAR is recommended due to more accurate results and fewer complications than those observed with the indirect approach (group A). Moreover, the total operation time and complications may be lesser than those with the bicoronal approach.

Differences Between Patient and Surgeon Perspectives: A Long-Term Follow-Up of 180 Patients With Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures Following Either Conservative or Surgical Treatment

Study Design

Retrospective with follow-up.

Objective

This study described the long-term outcomes of patients who received either conservative or surgical treatment for zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. It accounted for the perspectives of both patients and surgeons, and explored factors associated with patient satisfaction.

Methods

Patients with unilateral ZMC fractures 2007-2018 were invited to follow-up clinical examinations and photographic documentation. Patient experiences were recorded using a questionnaire. A review panel assessed computed tomography (CT) scans and photographs. Patient and surgeon perspectives of detecting functional sequelae were assessed, and a correlation matrix was used to evaluate different perspectives of perceiving malar asymmetry.

Results

The study sample consisted of 180 patients, of which conservative treatment was given to 43 patients and surgical treatment to 137 patients. Median follow-up time was 72.5 months after trauma. Overall satisfaction was 92.8%, with no significant difference between treatment groups. Patients and surgeons showed marked differences in detecting functional sequelae. Predicted malar asymmetry on CT scans did not correlate to findings on photographs or reports by patients.

Conclusions

A predicted sunken cheek on CT imaging does not necessarily lead to long-term visible asymmetry of the malar region. Surgeons should acknowledge different perspectives when predicting and assessing long-term sequelae of ZMC fractures, and seek consensus on when to perform surgical reconstructions.

Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: finding the least complicated surgical approach (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

BACKGROUND

Many approaches have been suggested for management of zygomaticomaxillary fractures. Each approach has its own advantages and limitations.

AIM OF THIS STUDY

The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach, conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients with age range of 20-50 years requiring open reduction and fixation of a fractured zygomatic complex were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group A: subtarsal approach group, group B: a conventional transconjunctival approach group and group C: Y- modification of the transconjunctival approach group. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

As for the exposure time, group C had the longest duration. Easy access to the site of fracture was reached in all groups with no statistically significant difference. During the first 24 h, the pain was only statistically significant between groups A and B with higher pain level in group A. After the first week, pain was significantly higher in groups A and C, with respect to group B. The least edema was observed in group B after 24 h, one week and four weeks postoperatively. Regarding ocular complications, wound healing and sensory nerve function, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Scarring was only noticeable in group A patients.

CONCLUSION

The transconjunctival approach provides adequate exposure with excellent esthetics and minor complications. The Y-modification also delivers an esthetic access with inconspicuous scar to the frontozygomatic region.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05695872).

Evaluation of sub-brow approach to the frontozygomatic suture for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Zygomatico maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures: A prospective cohort study

Introduction

Contemporary incisions used to access the frontozygomatic (FZ) sutures are the lateral brow and upper blepharoplasty incisions which are associated with specific limitations and complications. The authors describe the use of sub-brow incision as an alternate approach for exposure of the FZ region.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study involving patients requiring surgical management of zygomatico maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures with fixation at FZ suture alone or along with fixation at infra-orbital rim and/or zygomaticomaxillary buttress. A sub-brow incision was used to expose the fracture and fixation was done with a 4-hole miniplate. The parameters evaluated were specific to the FZ region (sub-brow incision), namely surgical access, bleeding, fracture exposure time, post-operative scar, and pain. Each patient was reviewed on 1st, 5th, 7th, 10th, 30th, and 90th day.

Results

The study sample included eight male patients. The mean age was 30 years. The sub-brow incision demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes; adequate exposure was achieved in all 8 patients. The scar formation was found to be higher on the 7th day and the least scar formation was seen by the third month. The mean pain score was found to be high on first post-operative day and the least pain was seen by the 10th day. The mean score of surgical field bleeding was found to be 1.75 which signified mild bleeding according to Fromme's scale. The mean time taken for adequate exposure of the fracture was 6.62 min. All the assessment parameters were statistically significant (P value <0.01).

Conclusion

Sub-brow incision is an effective approach for ORIF of zygomatic fractures at FZ suture. The technique is quick, simple, and associated with minimal complications.

Contemporary Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture is one of the most commonly treated facial fractures. Accurate reduction and stable fixation of the zygoma are required to restore facial symmetry and projection and avoid functional sequalae from changes in orbital volume. Achieving optimal outcome is challenging due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited visualization of all affected articulations of the zygoma. This article provides an updated overview of the evaluation and management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures based on available evidence and clinical experience at our center. The importance of soft tissue management is emphasized, and approaches to internal orbital reconstruction are discussed. While evidence remain limited, intraoperative imaging and navigation may prove to be useful adjuncts in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary fractures.

Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and zygomatic arch are common athletic injuries. Fracture displacement can lead to midfacial retrusion and widening, causing noticeable deformity. Associated signs and symptoms include hypoesthesia of the infraorbital nerve distribution, trismus, and subjective malocclusion. Operative treatment is indicated in cases of significant displacement or functional disturbance. The approach and details of osteosynthesis are catered to the specific characteristics of the fracture. Technology, such as virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, and intraoperative imaging, has the potential to improve accuracy of treating challenging fractures.

Three-dimensional intraoperative computed tomography imaging for zygomatic fracture repair

Objectives

Zygomatic complex (ZMC) fractures comprise up to 40% of all facial fractures. Misaligned bone fragments and misplaced fixation hardware traditionally detected postoperatively on plain radiographs of the skull might require re-operation. The intraoperative O-Arm (Medtronic, USA) is a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic imaging system.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective single-center study evaluated the utility of O-Arm scanning during corrective surgeries for ZMC and zygomatic arch (ZA) fractures from 2018 to 2020. Three females and 16 males (mean age, 31.52 years; range, 22-48 years) were included. Fracture instability (n=6) and facial deformity (n=15) were the most frequent indications for intraoperative 3D O-Arm scan.

Results

The images demonstrated that all fracture lines were properly reduced and fixed. Another scan performed at the end of the fixation or reduction stage, however, revealed suboptimal results in five of the 19 cases, and further reduction and fixation of the fracture lines were required.

Conclusion

Implementation of an intraoperative O-Arm system in ZMC and ZA fracture surgeries assists in obtaining predictable and accurate results and obviates the need for revision surgeries. The device should be considered for precise operations such as ZMC fracture repairs.

Zygomatico-Orbital Fracture-Dislocation in Surgical Treatment: Novel 3-Dimensional Software Automated Analysis

PURPOSE

The human capability to detect the degree of zygomatico-orbital (ZMO) fracture-dislocation in surgical treatment is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between ZMO fracture-dislocation and injury etiology and treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We implemented a retrospective cross-sectional study, enrolled a sample composed of patients with an isolated unilateral ZMO fracture, and analyzed fracture-dislocation from computed tomography images with an automatic algorithm. The primary predictor variable was mean surface point-to-point dislocation (the mean distance of dislocation for all surface points in isolated ZMO fracture segments between the original position and after virtual repositioning). The primary outcome was the treatment choice (operative vs nonoperative). Other studied variables were gender, age group, injury mechanism, clinical asymmetry, and human-evaluated dislocation on computed tomography images. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 115 patients with a mean age of 66.3 years, 66.1% of whom were male patients, and the most common cause of injury was falling on the ground (49.6%). Operative treatment was required in 58 patients (50.4%). A significant association was found between mean dislocation and operative treatment. Mean dislocation of operatively versus nonoperatively treated fractures was 2.39 mm versus 1.05 mm (P < .001). Mean fracture-dislocation was greatest in injuries caused by assault (2.41 mm) and smallest in motor vehicle accidents (1.08 mm) and ground-level falls (1.25 mm). The threshold of human-eye detection for ZMO fracture-dislocation was 1.97 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that the threshold for operative treatment of ZMO fracture-dislocation is over 2 mm, which the human eye is able to detect. True dislocation is greater in younger patients than elderly patients and in injuries caused by assault compared with falling.

Risk factors for hypesthesia after repair of facial fractures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of hypesthesia in patients with facial bone fractures and to identify the relationships between posttraumatic hypesthesia and risk factors, including general and fracture-related characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 437 patients who underwent surgery for facial bone fractures were included. Clinical neurosensory testing was performed at different time points (immediately after trauma and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery). The results of these assessments were compared with regard to characteristics and fracture sites.

RESULTS

The hypesthesia incidences were highest in the mandible (19.1%), maxilla (18.3%), and orbit (8.5%). Sensation was recovered by 97.3% of all patients by 6 months after surgery. Risk factors for hypesthesia were direct nerve injury (P = .002), distance (≤10 mm) between the fracture and nerve foramen (P = .002), the amount of bony displacement (P = .035), and age (P = .004). There were significant differences among the fracture sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttraumatic hypesthesia increased temporarily after surgery, but most patients recovered by 6 months postoperatively. Recovery from postoperative hypesthesia was related to the fracture site and pattern. Cases in which the patient did not recover involved direct nerve injury.

Facial Nerve Paralysis-A Rare Complication of Open Reduction of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Facial nerve paralysis is an unusual formidable complication that can manifest after various maxillofacial surgeries, including open reduction of facial trauma. The branches more predisposed to such injury are the zygomatic and marginal mandibular branches. Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are frequently encountered in maxillofacial trauma. The facial nerve has not been described as endangered during ZMC surgery. Paralysis of the buccal branch after ZMC repair with delayed onset has been reported only once. This report describes a patient with immediate facial nerve paralysis after open reduction and internal fixation of an isolated ZMC fracture through an intraoral approach. This is a previously unreported rare complication after ZMC fracture repair that should be discussed as a possibility when obtaining preoperative consent.

Two- versus Three-Point Internal Fixation of Displaced Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Despite the high frequency of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, there is no consensus among facial reconstructive surgeons regarding the best surgical management; thus, surgical choice for ZMC fractures is still challenging. This study included 40 patients with displaced ZMC fracture. Twenty patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using two-point fixation technique (at infraorbital margin and zygomaticofrontal buttress region) and the remaining 20 patients were treated with OR/IF using three-point fixation technique (at frontozygomatic suture, infraorbital margin, and zygomatico maxillary buttress). The results of both types of ZMC fractures repair were then statistically compared. No statistical differences between the two types regarding malar eminence asymmetry; projection (forward displacement) and width (medial displacement) in axial CT; inferior displacement; superior displacement and width (medial displacement) in coronal CT; angle of displacement (outward displacement) in 3D CT; masseter and temporalis muscles power electromyography; actual duration of surgery; and patient satisfaction. On the other hand, the total cost of the used plates and screws was significantly higher with three-point repair than two-point repair ( p  = 0.003). Moreover, postoperative CT lateral zygoma displacement was statistically significantly better in three-point fixation. Two-point fixation modality for displaced ZMC fractures is as effective as three-point method in fixation and prevents postreduction rotation or clinical displacement with significantly lower cost.

Transconjunctival versus subciliary approach to the infraorbital margin for open reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a randomized feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Although some studies addressed the differences between subciliary and transconjunctival approaches, no previous prospective comparative study on displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture that repaired by three-point internal fixation using also upper gingivolabial incision and upper eye lid incision. So, the effect of these incisions on the comparison was not investigated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare transconjunctival and subciliary approaches for open reduction and internal rigid fixation (OR/IF) of ZMC fractures.

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on 40 patients had displaced ZMC fractures repaired by OR/IF. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (20 patients for each); subciliary group subjected to subciliary approach and transconjunctival group subjected to transconjunctival approach for inferior orbital rim repair. In both groups, frontozygomatic and zygomaticomaxillary buttresses were also approached by lateral eye brow and superior gingivolabial incision, respectively. Primary outcome measures include accessibility (need for lateral canthotomy), the exposure duration, postoperative pain, early postoperative edema, and operative complications. Secondary outcome measures include dental occlusion, average intrinsic vertical mouth opening, post subciliary scar assessment, late postoperative complication, and opthalmological assessment concerning ectropion, entropion, scleral show, and eye globe affection (enophthalmos or diplopia).

RESULTS

The mean duration from incisions to fracture exposure was 13.7 ± 2.17 min in subciliary approach and 14.6 ± 2.31 min in transconjunctival approach with nonsignificant difference (p = 0.1284). Lateral canthotomy was required for proper exposure of the fracture and OR/IF using transconjunctival approach while not needed with subciliary approach. Ectropion and scleral show occurred in 10 and 15% respectively in subciliary group and were not encountered in transconjunctival group. Although postoperative periorbital edema was significantly more sever in transconjunctival group within the first postoperative week (p = 0.028), no persistent periorbital edema was reported. Infection, hematoma, and globe complication were not detected in any patient. All authors characterized all scars of the subciliary group as unnoticeable.

CONCLUSION

Transconjunctival approach mostly needs lateral canthotomy that was not needed with subciliary approach. Transient postoperative edema is more in transconjunctival approach while postoperative ectropion and sclera show was detected only with subciliary approach. So, building up of experience in transconjunctival approach will be beneficial for maxillofacial surgeons and more measures to avoid ectropion are needed with subciliary approach.

Advantages of intraoral and transconjunctival approaches for posterior displacement of a fractured zygomaticomaxillary complex

Background

Fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) is one of the most common facial injuries. A previous study has performed 3D analyses of the parallel and rotational displacements that occur in a fractured ZMC. However, few studies have investigated adequate fixation methods according to these displacements. Here, we assessed whether specific approaches and fixation methods for displacement of ZMC fractures produce esthetic results.

Methods

Hospital records and pre- and post-surgical computed tomographic scans of patients treated for ZMC fractures at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, between January 2010 and December 2015, were selected. Data were analyzed according to the direction of displacement and post-reduction prognosis using a 3D software.

Results

With ZMC fractures, displacement in the posterior direction occurred most frequently, while displacement in the superior-inferior direction was rare. A reduction using a transconjunctival approach and an intraoral approach was statistically better than that using an intraoral approach, Gillies approach, and lateral canthotomy approach for a posterior displacement (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

When posterior displacement of a fractured ZMC occurs, use of an intraoral approach and transconjunctival approach simultaneously is recommended for reducing and fixing the displaced fragment accurately.

Delayed Facial Nerve Palsy After Open Reduction of an Isolated Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture

Facial nerve paralysis is a devastating complication which can occur after a variety of otolaryngic procedures, including facial trauma repair. The frontal and marginal branches are most often placed at risk. However, facial nerve paralysis is not typically described as a risk in most uncomplicated facial trauma repairs of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC). In particular, buccal branch injury has not been described in a delayed setting following repair of the ZMC. The authors present a patient of delayed buccal branch paralysis following a simple ZMC repair which has not been previously reported.The diagnosis, clinical course, and management strategies for delayed facial nerve paralysis in the setting of a ZMC repair are discussed. This rare complication after facial trauma repair should be discussed with patients as a possible complication.

Trauma of the midface

Fractures of the midface pose a serious medical problem as for their complexity, frequency and their socio-economic impact. Interdisciplinary approaches and up-to-date diagnostic and surgical techniques provide favorable results in the majority of cases though. Traffic accidents are the leading cause and male adults in their thirties are affected most often. Treatment algorithms for nasal bone fractures, maxillary and zygomatic fractures are widely agreed upon whereas trauma to the frontal sinus and the orbital apex are matter of current debate. Advances in endoscopic surgery and limitations of evidence based gain of knowledge are matters that are focused on in the corresponding chapter. As for the fractures of the frontal sinus a strong tendency towards minimized approaches can be seen. Obliteration and cranialization seem to decrease in numbers. Some critical remarks in terms of high dose methylprednisolone therapy for traumatic optic nerve injury seem to be appropriate. Intraoperative cone beam radiographs and preshaped titanium mesh implants for orbital reconstruction are new techniques and essential aspects in midface traumatology. Fractures of the anterior skull base with cerebrospinal fluid leaks show very promising results in endonasal endoscopic repair.

Electromyography assessment in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the activity of the masseter and temporalis muscles using surface electromyography (EMG) in patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on 25 patients who had ZMC fractures. Fifteen patients were managed by open reduction and rigid fixation (ORIF) using titanium miniplates. This study, using surface electromyography, analyzed the activity of the masseter and temporalis muscles of 25 patients with ZMC fractures; 15 of them were surgically treated under general anesthesia (GA). Evaluations were made before surgery and 6 weeks after surgery by recording the mean of muscle contraction of 20 motor unit action potential (MUAP) against resistance, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A significant EMG difference between the normal and ZMC fracture sides was found (P < 0.0001) for both masseter and temporalis muscles and was significantly improved after ORIF. However, postoperative EMV values of the repaired side was significantly less than measured postoperatively in the normal side (P < 0.0001) for both muscles.

CONCLUSION

ZMC fractures significantly diminish muscular activity of the masseter and temporalis and even though significant recovery of muscle activity was revealed after 6 weeks, it is still less than normal activity, highlighting the importance of postoperative rehabilitation.

Management of tripod fractures (zygomaticomaxillary complex) 1 point and 2 point fixations: A 5-year review

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) plays a key role in the structure, function, and esthetic appearance of the facial skeleton. They can account for approximately 40% of mid-face fractures. They are the second most common facial bone fracture after nasal bone injuries. The fracture complex results from a direct blow to the malar eminence and results in three distinct fracture components that disrupt the anchoring of the zygoma. In addition, the fracture components may result in impingement of the temporalis muscle, trismus (difficulty with mastication) and may compromise the infraorbital foramen/nerve resulting in hypesthesia within its sensory distribution. A 4-year retrospective review of all patients treated with ZMC fractures at oral and maxillofacial surgery department, sree balaji dental college and hospital was performed. Computed tomography scans were reviewed. Demographics, treatment protocols, outcomes, complications, reoperations, and length of follow-up were identified. A total of 245 patients was identified by the Current Procedural Terminology codes for ZMC fractures. Closed or open reduction methods were performed with the goal of treatment being preservation of normal facial structure, sensory function, globe position, and mastication functionality. Unacceptably poor surgical outcomes are uncommon. Significant facial asymmetry requiring surgical revision occurs in 3-4% of patients. Postoperative infection rates are extremely low, and these infections nearly always resolve with oral antibiotics. In general, the long-term prognosis after repair of ZMC fractures is very good.

Clinical Follow-up on Sagittal Fracture at the Temporal Root of the Zygomatic Arch: Does It Need Open Reduction?

Background

The zygoma is a major portion of the midfacial contour. When deformity occurs in this area, a reduction should be conducted to correct it. If a sagittal fracture at the temporal root of the zygomatic arch occurs, this also requires reduction, but it is difficult to approach due to its anatomical location, and the possibility of fixation is also limited. Thus, the authors attempted the reduction of sagittal fracture by two- or three-point fixation and the Gillies approach without direct manipulation. The preoperative and postoperative results of the patients were evaluated. Follow-up was performed to establish a treatment guideline.

Methods

A retrospective study was done with 40 patients who had sagittal fractures at the temporal root of the zygomatic arch from March 2009 to June 2012. Only two- or three-point fixation was performed for the accompanying zygomatic-orbital-maxillary fracture. The Gillies approach was used for complex fractures of the zygomatic arch, while the temporal root of the zygomatic arch was only observed without reduction. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography and X-ray scans were performed to examine the results.

Results

The result of the paired t-test on preoperative and postoperative bone gap differences, the depression level, and the degree of temporal protrusion showed a marked decrease in the mean difference at a 95% confidence interval. The results were acceptable.

Conclusions

In the treatment of sagittal fractures at the temporal root of the zygomatic arch, it is acceptable to use indirect reduction and non-fixation methods. This leads to a satisfactory aesthetic and functional outcome.

Management of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) has important aesthetic, structural, and functional roles that need to be preserved and/or restored during treatment of facial fractures. Surgical treatment of ZMC fractures is indicated when there is displacement of the bony fragments, and open reduction and internal fixation is the treatment of choice in cases of comminution or fracture instability. The surgical approaches used for fracture reduction as well as the type, number, and location of the fixation will be determined by the pattern of the fracture and the surgeon's preference. This article discusses the main points of the management of ZMC fractures.

3-D analysis of dislocation in zygoma fractures

OBJECTIVE

When fractured, zygomas rotate and dislocate. The present study quantitatively elucidates the pattern of the rotation.

METHODS

50 patients with tri-pod-type zygoma fractures were involved in this study. After defining a 3-dimensional coordinate system--consisting of the M-L axis (the axis directed from the medial to lateral side of the skull), I-S axis (directed from the inferior to superior side), and P-A axis (directed from the posterior to anterior side), the degree with which the fractured zygomas rotated around each of these axes was measured using 3-dimensional graphic software. Thereafter, the tendency of the rotation was compared between the three rotational axes.

RESULTS

Rotation around the I-S axis was the most frequent with a 96% incidence, followed by a substantial margin by rotation around the M-L axis with a 26% incidence; rotation around the P-A axis was rare, with an incidence of 10%. Furthermore, the degree of P-A axis rotation was minor compared to I-S and M-L axis rotations.

CONCLUSION

The main factor of zygoma dislocation in zygoma fracture is rotation around the I-S axis. This finding is helpful for effective performance to reposition fractured zygomas.

Evaluation of the lateral orbital approach in management of zygomatic bone fractures

Zygomatic maxillary fractures, also known as tripod fractures, are usually the result of a direct blow to the body of the zygoma. Tripod fracture consists of (a) zygomatic arch fracture, (b) fracture of the lateral orbital wall, and (c) fracture of the inferior orbital floor. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and esthetic outcome following this lateral orbital approach in the management of zygoma fracture. This study was carried out in VMS Dental College, Salem, and in a private hospital. This study was based on the experience gained from a retrospective study of the 30 lateral orbital approaches that were used in 30 patients with fractures of the zygomatic complex, which were conducted for a period of 8 years between January 2003 and January 2011. In the retrospective study, all the 30 patients were able to open the mouth completely; eyeball movements were normal; esthetically, all patients appeared normal. There were no sinusitis or visual problems in any of the studied patients. We conclude that the lateral orbital approach is an ideal option in reduction and treatment of zygomatic bone and arch fractures.

Optimizing the surgical management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are a group of fractures that can significantly alter the structure, function, and appearance of the midface, including the globe. Like other facial fractures, the optimal management of operative ZMC fractures requires anatomic reduction of all fractures followed by rigid internal fixation. However, surgical treatment of these fractures can be quite challenging with the potential for high rates of complications. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of ZMC fractures and discuss treatment options, with an emphasis on providing surgical pearls to optimize outcomes.

Evaluation of fixation techniques with titanium plates and Kirschner wires for zygoma fractures: preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of treatment using two reduction and fixation techniques for zygoma fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was carried out involving a sample of 10 patients with Knight and North type III, IV and V zygoma fractures divided into two groups. One group underwent the closed reduction technique and fixation with Kirschner wire and the other group underwent the open reduction technique and fixation with titanium plates. The groups were submitted to subjective evaluation based on the patient's perception of areas of deformity and paresthesia as well as the measurement of range of mouth opening and pain upon mouth opening in the preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) periods. The assessment of bone reduction quality was performed using quantifiable points (lateral wall of the orbit, anteroposterior projection of the zygoma and ocular globe projection), measured based on tomographic images.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of the patients remained with paresthesia and 20% remained with the complaint of deformity at T1. Mouth opening range increased in both groups at T1. In the overall sample, mean total disjunction of the lateral wall of the orbit and the difference in the anteroposterior projection of the zygoma were reduced between T0 and T1 (4.36 mm to 1.25 mm and 6.94 mm to 2.86 mm, respectively). There was also a reduction in ocular globe projection in both groups between T0 and T1.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques achieved adequate reduction of zygoma fractures in the postoperative period.

Reoperative midface trauma

Reoperative midface surgery can be challenging. Although well-established surgical principles are still the basis of surgical approaches and techniques, the advent of new materials and technologies brings about opportunities to achieve the best possible outcomes with bony reconstruction and more precise results. Soft tissue deformities continue to be some of the most challenging, especially as they relate to the orbit, but continually evolving techniques offer improved results for volume corrections to treat enophthalmos and diplopia. Conventional orthognathic and reconstructive rhinoplasty techniques can also be applied to great effect and with satisfying results to treat posttraumatic malocclusions and nasal deformities.