Evaluation of Different Patterns of Zygomaticoorbital Complex Fractures

Study Design

Very few studies exist regarding the fracture pattern variability of the zygomaticoorbital (ZMO) complex. The retrospective evaluation of a large series of surgically treated unilateral ZMO fractures would in certain circumstances help intraoperative predictability and define sensitive indicators for open reduction and internal fixation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the different fracture patterns after ZMO complex injury regarding the 5 anatomic sutures of the zygoma as well as the concomitance of the paranasal buttress and maxillary sinus wall fracture.

Methods

The medical records of all patients with unilateral ZMO fractures who underwent surgical intervention in a single trauma center department between April 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and anamnesis data, radiologic findings, and surgical reports were evaluated. According to the preoperative radiologic evaluation, ZMO fractures were classified as unisutural, bisutural, trisutural, tetrasutural, and complete based on the number of zygomatic sutures. The prevalence of various fracture patterns was analyzed. The impact of patient's age and trauma etiology on the fracture pattern was evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis.

Results

The study included 492 patients with unilateral ZMO fractures, with a mean age of 49.93 years (SD = 20.66) and a male:female ratio of 2.23:1. The most affected age group was 19-44 years (41.67%) and tripping falls were the most common etiology (27.24%). Trisutural (57.32%) and unisutural fractures (23.17%) were the most common, followed by tetrasutural (8.94%), bisutural (8.54%), and complete fractures (2.03%). A trisutural fracture involving the zygomaticomaxillary suture, the infraorbital rim, and the zygomaticosphenoidal suture was the most common fracture pattern (52.03%). Most fractures were observed in the zygomaticosphenoidal suture (86.99%), followed by the infraorbital rim (74.59%) and the zygomaticomaxillary suture (68.29%). Fractures of the maxillary sinus wall and the paranasal buttress co-existed in 9.55% and 31.30% of all cases, respectively. No correlation was detected between age and fracture pattern (P = .4111). Tripping falls and bicycle accidents significantly influenced the fracture pattern (P < .0001).

Conclusions

According to the results, knowledge of the fracture pattern variability of the ZMO complex could in certain circumstances designate CT or CBCT as mandatory before operating on ZMO fractures. Consequently, unnecessary incisions could be avoided. The high concomitance of paranasal buttress fracture also suggests its intraoperative surgical exploration. Further studies should correlate the clinical findings with indication for surgery and postoperative outcome for the different fracture patterns described.

Effect of tranexamic acid on postoperative blood loss

The aim of this article was to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss after maxillofacial fracture surgery. Clinical data were collected retrospectively on patients with unilateral fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) or mandibular condyle. Patients were then further divided into TXA and control groups according to whether or not TXA was used after surgery. The amount of postoperative blood loss was evaluated by negative pressure drainage volume. Data were statistically analysed. In patients with unilateral ZMC fractures, total postoperative blood loss in the TXA group was about 30 ml less than that in the control group (p = 0.006). It was significantly less on the first and second postoperative days. However, in patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures, there was no significant difference between the TXA and control groups (p = 0.917). TXA can reduce postoperative bleeding in patients with ZMC fractures, and the optimal usage time is on the first and second postoperative days. For patients with mandibular condylar fractures, TXA may not be used.

Post-operative Scar Comparison With Supraorbital Eyebrow and Upper Blepharoplasty Approach in the Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Study Design

A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the postsurgical scar with Supraorbital Eyebrow (SE) Approach and Upper Blepharoplasty (UB) Approach used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

Objective

To evaluate and compare the post-operative scar using Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) following ORIF of ZMC fractures with SE and UB approaches.

Methods

In this study, 88 patients with ZMC fractures requiring ORIF and meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited between 2019 and 2020. Patients were randomly divided into SE and UB group, 44 patients in each. Clinical and radiological assessment was done preoperatively and post-operative scar evaluation was carried out at different intervals over a period of 6 months using VSS. A blinded observer rated the scar.

Results

The results showed that after 6 months of surgery, all the 44 (100%) patients in UB group had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5), while in the SE group 34 (77.3%) patients had a mild scar (VSS score 1-5) and 10 (22.7%) had a moderate scar (VSS score 6-10). The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P-value = .001).

Conclusions

The UB approach has been established to be superior to SE approach in terms of post-operative scar as the results were statistically significant. This study can be used to advocate more frequent use of UB approach as compared to the previously popular SE approach for the management of ZMC fractures.

Incidence, Aetiology, and Associated Fracture Patterns of Infraorbital Nerve Injuries Following Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of 272 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are common facial injuries with heterogeneity regarding aetiologies, fracture types, infraorbital nerve (ION) involvement, and treatment methods. The aim of this study was to identify associations between aetiologies, fracture types, and neurological complications. Additionally, treatment methods and recovery time were investigated.

METHODS

Medical files of 272 patients with unilateral and bilateral ZMC fractures were reviewed, whose cases were managed from January 2014 to January 2019 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University hospitals Leuven, Belgium. History of ION sensory dysfunction and facial nerve motoric dysfunction were noted during follow-up.

RESULTS

ION hypoaesthesia incidence was 37.3%, with the main causes being fall accidents, road traffic accidents, and interpersonal violence. Significant predictors of ION hypoaesthesia were Zingg type B fractures (P = 0.003), fracture line course through the infraorbital canal (P < .001), orbital floor fracture (P < 0.001), and ZMC dislocation or mobility (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Of all ZMC fractures, 37.3% exhibited ION hypoaesthesia. Only ZMC Zingg type B fractures (74.0%) were significantly more associated with ION hypoaesthesia. ION hypoesthesia was more likely (OR = 2.707) when the fracture line course ran through the infraorbital canal, and was less dependent on the degree of displacement. Neuropathic pain symptoms developed after ZMC fractures in 2.2% patients, posing a treatment challenge. Neuropathic pain symptoms were slightly more common among women, and were associated only with type B or C fractures. No other parameters were found to predict the outcome of this post-traumatic neuropathic pain condition.

Contemporary Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture is one of the most commonly treated facial fractures. Accurate reduction and stable fixation of the zygoma are required to restore facial symmetry and projection and avoid functional sequalae from changes in orbital volume. Achieving optimal outcome is challenging due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited visualization of all affected articulations of the zygoma. This article provides an updated overview of the evaluation and management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures based on available evidence and clinical experience at our center. The importance of soft tissue management is emphasized, and approaches to internal orbital reconstruction are discussed. While evidence remain limited, intraoperative imaging and navigation may prove to be useful adjuncts in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary fractures.

Associated Ophthalmic Injuries in Patients With Fractures of the Midface

Purpose

Concomitant ophthalmic injuries are common in patients with facial fractures, though frequency varies widely in the literature. Major ophthalmic injuries can have drastic consequences for patients, and permanent visual impairment cannot be prevented in all cases. This study analyzed the frequency and distribution pattern of associated ophthalmic injuries in patients who received operative treatment for fractures of the midface.

Material and Methods

The clinical information system was searched for patients with midface fractures that were treated operatively between December 2014 and November 2017. Demographic, fracture-related, and ophthalmic data were assessed and statistically analyzed.

Results

This study included 282 patients. The most common fracture types were zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures and orbital floor fractures. Falls and violence were the most common causes of fractures (43.3% and 24.5%, respectively). Chemosis and subconjunctival bleeding were the most common associated eye injuries. The most prevalent long-term eye injury was diplopia, which was identified in 18.4% of cases preoperatively. Postoperative diplopia persisted in 36 cases (12.8%) at 3-month follow-up. Optic neuropathy, enophthalmos, exophthalmos, and retrobulbar hematomas were identified infrequently.

Conclusion

Minor ophthalmic injuries, including chemosis and subconjunctival bleeding, are more frequently associated with midface trauma. These minor injuries tend to heal quickly and without sequela. Major ophthalmic injuries, including retinal detachment, optic neuropathy, and retrobulbar hematomas, are identified less frequently. Special attention should be paid to patients with diplopia, as this condition may persist and have long-term occupational consequences. Therefore, close interdisciplinary collaboration is essential when treating patients with fractures of the midface to prevent permanent visual impairment.

Two- versus Three-Point Internal Fixation of Displaced Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Despite the high frequency of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures, there is no consensus among facial reconstructive surgeons regarding the best surgical management; thus, surgical choice for ZMC fractures is still challenging. This study included 40 patients with displaced ZMC fracture. Twenty patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using two-point fixation technique (at infraorbital margin and zygomaticofrontal buttress region) and the remaining 20 patients were treated with OR/IF using three-point fixation technique (at frontozygomatic suture, infraorbital margin, and zygomatico maxillary buttress). The results of both types of ZMC fractures repair were then statistically compared. No statistical differences between the two types regarding malar eminence asymmetry; projection (forward displacement) and width (medial displacement) in axial CT; inferior displacement; superior displacement and width (medial displacement) in coronal CT; angle of displacement (outward displacement) in 3D CT; masseter and temporalis muscles power electromyography; actual duration of surgery; and patient satisfaction. On the other hand, the total cost of the used plates and screws was significantly higher with three-point repair than two-point repair ( p  = 0.003). Moreover, postoperative CT lateral zygoma displacement was statistically significantly better in three-point fixation. Two-point fixation modality for displaced ZMC fractures is as effective as three-point method in fixation and prevents postreduction rotation or clinical displacement with significantly lower cost.

Review of In Vivo Bone Strain Studies and Finite Element Models of the Zygomatic Complex in Humans and Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Clinical Research and Practice

The craniofacial skeleton is often described in the clinical literature as being comprised of vertical bony pillars, which transmit forces from the toothrow to the neurocranium as axial compressive stresses, reinforced transversely by buttresses. Here, we review the literature on bony microarchitecture, in vivo bone strain, and finite-element modeling of the facial skeleton of humans and nonhuman primates to address questions regarding the structural and functional existence of facial pillars and buttresses. Available bone material properties data do not support the existence of pillars and buttresses in humans or Sapajus apella. Deformation regimes in the zygomatic complex emphasize bending and shear, therefore conceptualizing the zygomatic complex of humans or nonhuman primates as a pillar obscures its patterns of stress, strain, and deformation. Human fossil relatives and chimpanzees exhibit strain regimes corroborating the existence of a canine-frontal pillar, but the notion of a zygomatic pillar has no support. The emerging consensus on patterns of strain and deformation in finite element models (FEMs) of the human facial skeleton corroborates hypotheses in the clinical literature regarding zygomatic complex function, and provide new insights into patterns of failure of titanium and resorbable plates in experimental studies. It is suggested that the "pillar and buttress" model of human craniofacial skeleton function be replaced with FEMs that more accurately and precisely represent in vivo function, and which can serve as the basis for future research into implants used in restoration of occlusal function and fracture repair. Anat Rec, 299:1753-1778, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Management of tripod fractures (zygomaticomaxillary complex) 1 point and 2 point fixations: A 5-year review

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) plays a key role in the structure, function, and esthetic appearance of the facial skeleton. They can account for approximately 40% of mid-face fractures. They are the second most common facial bone fracture after nasal bone injuries. The fracture complex results from a direct blow to the malar eminence and results in three distinct fracture components that disrupt the anchoring of the zygoma. In addition, the fracture components may result in impingement of the temporalis muscle, trismus (difficulty with mastication) and may compromise the infraorbital foramen/nerve resulting in hypesthesia within its sensory distribution. A 4-year retrospective review of all patients treated with ZMC fractures at oral and maxillofacial surgery department, sree balaji dental college and hospital was performed. Computed tomography scans were reviewed. Demographics, treatment protocols, outcomes, complications, reoperations, and length of follow-up were identified. A total of 245 patients was identified by the Current Procedural Terminology codes for ZMC fractures. Closed or open reduction methods were performed with the goal of treatment being preservation of normal facial structure, sensory function, globe position, and mastication functionality. Unacceptably poor surgical outcomes are uncommon. Significant facial asymmetry requiring surgical revision occurs in 3-4% of patients. Postoperative infection rates are extremely low, and these infections nearly always resolve with oral antibiotics. In general, the long-term prognosis after repair of ZMC fractures is very good.