Early Differential Value of Plasma Presepsin on Infection of Trauma Patients

Usefulness of presepsin as a prognostic indicator for patients with trauma in the emergency department in Korea: a retrospective study

Purpose

Trauma is an important public health concern, and it is important to increase the survival rate of patients with trauma and enable them to return to society in a better condition. Initial treatment in the emergency department (ED) is closely associated with the prognosis of patients with trauma. However, studies regarding laboratory biomarker tests that can help predict the prognosis of trauma patients are limited. Presepsin is a novel biomarker of inflammation that can predict a poor prognosis in patients with sepsis. This study aimed to determine whether presepsin could be used as a prognostic indicator in patients with polytrauma.

Methods

The study included patients with trauma who had visited a single regional ED from November 2021 to January 2023. Patients who had laboratory tests in the ED were included and analyzed retrospectively through chart review. Age, sex, injury mechanism, vital signs, surgery, the outcome of ED treatment (admission, discharge, transfer, or death), and trauma scores were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 550 trauma patients were enrolled; 59.1% were men, and the median age was 64 years (interquartile range, 48.8-79.0 years). Patients in a hypotensive state (systolic blood pressure, <90 mmHg; n=39) had higher presepsin levels (1,061.5±2,522.7 pg/mL) than those in a nonhypotensive state (n=511, 545.7±688.4 pg/mL, P<0.001). Patients hospitalized after ED treatment had the highest presepsin levels (660.9 pg/mL), followed by those who died (652.0 pg/mL), were transferred to other hospitals (514.9 pg/mL), and returned home (448.0 pg/mL, P=0.041).

Conclusions

Serum presepsin levels were significantly higher in trauma patients in a hypotensive state than in those in a nonhypotensive state. Additionally, serum presepsin levels were the highest in hospitalized patients with trauma, followed by those who died, were transferred to other hospitals, and returned home.

Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the Holy Grail or chasing a mirage!

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulated host response to infection. It is a complex syndrome and is characterized by physiologic, pathologic and biochemical abnormalities in response to an infection. Diagnosis of sepsis is based on history, physical examination and other investigations (including biomarkers) which may help to increase the certainty of diagnosis. Biomarkers have been evaluated in the past for many diseases and have been evaluated for sepsis as well. Biomarkers may find a possible role in diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic monitoring and anti-microbial stewardship in sepsis. Since the pathophysiology of sepsis is quite complex and is incompletely understood, a single biomarker that may be robust enough to provide all information has not been found as of yet. However, many biomarkers have been studied and some of them have applications at the bedside and guide clinical decision-making. We evaluated the PubMed database to search for sepsis biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and possible role in antibiotic escalation and de-escalation. Clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials were included. Commonly studied biomarkers such as procalcitonin, Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator (Supar), presepsin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, etc., have been described for their possible applications as biomarkers in septic patients. The sepsis biomarkers are still an area of active research with newer evidence adding to the knowledge base continuously. For patients presenting with sepsis, early diagnosis and prompt resuscitation and early administration of anti-microbials (preferably within 1 h) and source control are desired goals. Biomarkers may help us in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic monitoring of septic patients. The marker redefining our view on sepsis is yet a mirage that clinicians and researchers continue to chase.

Predictive Role of Changes in Presepsin and Early Sepsis in ICU Patients After Abdominal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

It is difficult to identify early sepsis after surgery due to postoperative inflammatory reactions. Presepsin, a glycoprotein expressed on the surface of innate immune cells, is produced during bacterial phagocytosis, and its level increases in the bloodstream of sepsis patients. We aimed to measure the differences between the diagnostic ability of presepsin and other biomarkers to identify postoperative sepsis and septic shock in acute period after major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

From March 2020 to March 2021, patients who underwent surgery due to intra-abdominal infection were enrolled. Level of presepsin and procalcitonin, and white blood cell counts were prospectively measured every morning for 3 d from intensive care unit admission after surgery (from T0 to T3). Diagnostic values of inflammatory markers were compared to predict early development of sepsis or septic shock within 7 d after surgery. Cut-off value of significant risk factor associated with postoperative sepsis or septic shock were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 298 patients, postoperative sepsis and septic shock occurred in 91 and 38 patients, respectively. For prediction of early postoperative sepsis or septic shock, presepsin and procalcitonin had comparable diagnostic abilities. In multivariate analysis, presepsin > 406.5 pg/mL at T0 (Odds Ratio [OR]:4.055, P = 0.047), presepsin > 1216 pg/mL at T2 (OR:40.030, P = 0.005) and procalcitonin > 1.685 ng/mL at T2 (OR: 5.229, P = 0.008) were significant factors for predicting the occurrence of early postoperative septic shock.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis or septic shock was feasible in acute postoperative period. It would be useful to monitor newly developed sepsis from normal inflammatory response, especially in patients who underwent surgical operation for the elimination of intra-abdominal infection.

Systemic Infection Predictive Value of Procalcitonin to Lactic Acid Ratio in Diabetes Ketoacidosis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Early detection of bacterial infections associated with adequate antibiotic treatment is key to improving diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) outcomes. Our study aimed to investigate the different sepsis markers (including procalcitonin to lactic acid ratio, PLR) to diagnose bacterial infection in patients with DKA within one hour after admission.

METHODS

A total of 165 patients diagnosed with DKA were enrolled between July 2014 and July 2018 and divided into an infection group (N =62) and a non-infection group (N=103) based on the positive aetiological tests such as blood culture, sputum culture, urine culture, or definite focus of pulmonary, soft tissue, kidney, etc.

RESULTS

Our findings suggest the following: 1) leucocytes (threshold above 10×10⁹ /L) and PLR (threshold above 0.438) within one hour after admission can help to identify patients with infection in the context of DKA. 2) A subgroup analysis demonstrated that PLR also has a high diagnostic efficacy for infection in patients with DKA, regardless of the type of diabetes.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that leucocyte count (threshold > 10×10⁹/L) and PLR (threshold above 0.438) show a diagnostic value to help distinguish DKA patients with infection. By combining these two markers, the reduction of antibiotic misuse may be possible.

The Prognostic Value of Presepsin for Sepsis in Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Rapid diagnosis accompanied by appropriate treatment is essential in the therapy of sepsis. However, there is no blood marker available, which reliably predicts sepsis and associated mortality. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate presepsin and endotoxin in comparison with established blood markers in patients undergoing emergency visceral surgery for abdominal infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 31 patients with abdominal infection undergoing emergency surgery between March and August 2014. The Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions of sepsis were used. Blood markers (presepsin, endotoxin, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin 6 (IL-6), white blood count) were analyzed preoperatively and correlated with the clinical course and mortality. Additionally, a combination of the three markers, which performed best, was tested.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (64.5%) in the analyzed cohort developed sepsis from an abdominal focus according to the latest sepsis definition. Out of the analyzed blood markers, presepsin exhibited the highest area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the prediction of the development of sepsis. Moreover, presepsin had the highest predictive value for mortality as opposed to both endotoxin and previously established blood markers (i.e., PCT, IL-6). The multimarker approach, which included PCT, IL-6, and presepsin, showed no additional predictive value over presepsin alone.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that presepsin is a novel predictor of sepsis and mortality from sepsis in patients undergoing surgery for intra-abdominal infections. The findings of the present study should be validated in a larger cohort.

The prognostic value of Presepsin for postoperative complications following pancreatic resection: A prospective study

Background

Presepsin is involved in binding lipopolysaccharides and previous studies have confirmed its value as a marker for early diagnosis and prediction of severity in sepsis. Comparable studies assessing the predictive potential regarding postoperative complications and mortality following pancreatic resection are lacking.

Methods

This prospective study included 70 patients undergoing pancreatic resection from December 2017 until May 2019. Presepsin was measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, 3 and 8 (POD1/3/8) and correlated with the clinical course and mortality.

Results

Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) occurred in 28 patients (40%), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C occurred in 20 patients (28.6%), infectious complications in 28 (40%), and four patients (5.7%) died during hospital stay. Presepsin levels at any timepoint did not correlate with further development of postoperative complications or in-hospital mortality whereas CRP levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 were significantly associated with clinically relevant POPF (AUC 0.664, 95%CI 0.528–0.800; p = 0.033). Preoperative Presepsin levels as well as Presepsin on POD1 were significantly elevated in patients with malignant compared to benign underlying disease (299pg/ml vs. 174pg/ml and 693.5pg/ml vs. 294pg/ml; p = 0.009 and 0.013, respectively).

Conclusion

In our cohort, Presepsin was not eligible to predict the postoperative course following pancreatic resection. However, Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in patients with malignant disease, this finding warrants further investigation.