1
|
International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation: The RAPID Consensus ISLS 2023 Zurich Collaborative. Int J Surg 2025; 111:2766-2772. [PMID: 39907624 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since its beginning in 1963, liver transplantation has significantly advanced, now including transplant oncology. As indications broaden, donor supply reduces. The two-stage RAPID procedure (initially abbreviated as "Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy") has emerged to address the use of small-for-size grafts. However, a comprehensive evaluation of RAPID is essential given its novelty, scarcity, and diverse outcomes reported. METHODS The RAPID Consensus International Society of Liver Surgeons 2023 Zurich initiative established evidence around the RAPID procedure using the Danish Model of Consensus. Engaging an international community of specialists, the initiative ensured multidisciplinary involvement and used the GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the recommendations. RESULTS Comprehensive discussions and debates led to internationally recognized recommendations addressing perioperative measures for RAPID. Key recommendations highlighted the significance of standardized nomenclature, specific indications, graft criteria, surgical techniques, optimal interstage timings, and measures to manage potential complications. CONCLUSION The consensus provides recommendations for the RAPID procedure, emphasizing transparency and outcome reporting. Establishing dedicated registries can improve care standards, which may ensure the benefits of RAPID by maximizing patient safety and improving outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Tong Y, Gu Q, Dong B, Ying H, Ji T, Shen X, Shen B, Yu H, Feng L, Cai X, Li Z. Beta-catenin/sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway promotion of portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced rapid liver regeneration. Surgery 2025; 182:109343. [PMID: 40157124 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2025] [Revised: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND By accelerating the regeneration of the future liver remnant, portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection allows for more extensive hepatectomy. Given that the mechanism remains poorly understood, the aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. METHODS A portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration mouse model was established, followed by RNA microarray analysis to identify candidate molecules. Genomic deletion and chemical manipulation of target molecules were used to explore their functions in portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. Validation was conducted using a diseased liver model and human samples. RESULTS Portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration was significantly accelerated compared with that in sham-operated mice (P < .05). An RNA microarray revealed that Sirtuin 1 is a crucial molecule in the proliferation of the future liver remnant. Regardless of whether Sirtuin 1 is inhibited chemically or through genetic deletion, portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration is distinctly attenuated. Further investigation revealed that Sirtuin 1 promoted portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration via the farnesoid X receptor. In addition, beta-catenin also was found to participate in the process of future liver remnant proliferation. Chemical inhibition of beta-catenin markedly impaired but activation of WNT/beta-catenin mildly enhanced portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration (P < .05). Deletion of Sirtuin 1 blocked the facilitating effect of beta-catenin on portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. These findings were validated in diseased liver models and patient samples, confirming the correlation between the beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway and portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. CONCLUSION Activation of the beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway offers critical mechanistic insights into accelerating portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. Modulation of beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor may therefore improve clinical outcomes in patients receiving staged hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qiuxia Gu
- Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bingzhi Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hanning Ying
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tong Ji
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaoyun Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hong Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lifeng Feng
- Department of Biomedical Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zheyong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of General Surgery, Alaer Hospital, School of Medicine, Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li AY, Ahmad MU, Sofilos MC, Lee RM, Maithel SK, Lee TC, Chadalavada S, Shah SA, Acher AW, Abbott DE, Wong P, Kessler J, Melstrom LG, Kirks R, Rocha FG, Delitto DJ, Lee B, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite preoperative portal vein embolization: Not just about the volumetrics. Surgery 2025; 182:109345. [PMID: 40157125 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Future liver remnant hypertrophy is the primary endpoint of portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy. However, even when adequate future liver remnant is achieved, postoperative hepatic insufficiency is not universally averted. We aimed to identify preoperative risk factors of postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite the use of portal vein embolization. METHODS Patients who underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy at 6 academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency was defined as postoperative peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL. Preoperative variables associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency were analyzed. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, 164 patients underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy. Twenty (12%) patients developed postoperative hepatic insufficiency. On univariate analysis, postoperative hepatic insufficiency was associated with older age, performance status, preoperative biliary drainage, smaller pre- and post-portal vein embolization future liver remnant volumes, diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer, and preoperative cholangitis. There was significant future liver remnant hypertrophy noted even in the setting of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (from 27% to 39%); however, degree of hypertrophy >5% (100% vs 93%, P = .6) and kinetic growth rate >2%/week (95% vs 82%, P = .3) did not differ between the postoperative hepatic insufficiency and non-postoperative hepatic insufficiency groups. On multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer and preoperative cholangitis (postoperative hepatic insufficiency incidence 34% and 62%, respectively), but not future liver remnant volumetrics, were independently associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency raised post-hepatectomy 90-day mortality from 3.5% to 45% and hospitalization from 7 days to 16 days (both P < .001). CONCLUSION Postoperative hepatic insufficiency still occurs in 12% of patients after major hepatectomy despite preoperative portal vein embolization. In addition to traditional volumetric information, surgeons should be aware of preoperative cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer as powerful predictors of this fatal complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Li
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Marc C Sofilos
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Rachel M Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tiffany C Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Seetharam Chadalavada
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Shimul A Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Alexandra W Acher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Paul Wong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Russell Kirks
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Daniel J Delitto
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - George A Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyadov VK, Moskalenko AN, Magomedov MM, Galkin VN. [Laparoscopic ALPPS procedure: a series of cases]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2025:20-26. [PMID: 39918799 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202502120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2025]
Abstract
The combination of liver resection and chemotherapy is the most effective way to treat primary and secondary malignant liver tumors. One of the methods for increasing resectability is the use of two-stage liver resection (associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy - ALPPS). OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility of laparoscopic ALPPS with good short-term and long-term results. MATERIAL AND METHODS From 2020 to 2021, in the oncology department No. 4 of the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "GKOB 1 DZM" 6 laparoscopic ALPPS were performed for metastases of colorectal cancer in the liver in 4 patients and cholangiocellular cancer in two in the presence of an insufficient volume of remaining liver parenchyma (13-32.1%). RESULTS All patients underwent the first stage of ALPPS laparoscopically without conversions or intraoperative complications. The duration of the operation ranged from 300 to 470 minutes (average 347.5±74 minutes), blood loss - from 100 to 300 ml (average 175±88 ml). The duration of the second stage is from 165 to 470 minutes (average 281.5±132.9 minutes) with blood loss from 100 to 850 ml (average 484.5±392.3 ml). The increase in the volume of residual liver parenchyma was 36-68%. The period between the ALPPS stages ranged from 13 to 22 days. Final resection to the extent of R0 was performed in 4 of 6 patients. The second stage of ALPPS was complicated in two patients by the formation of an external biliary fistula and in another two by right-sided hydrothorax. The median follow-up was 25 months, during which time 3 patients died: two patients with incomplete second stage ALPPS due to cancer progression and one patient from coronavirus infection. CONCLUSION ALPPS can be performed entirely laparoscopically with good short-term and long-term results, but should be performed in high-volume liver surgery centers by an experienced surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V K Lyadov
- Yudin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
- Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Studies, Novokuznetsk, Russia
| | | | | | - V N Galkin
- Yudin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boubaddi M, Marichez A, Adam JP, Lapuyade B, Debordeaux F, Tlili G, Chiche L, Laurent C. Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:9205-9220. [PMID: 39230854 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16108-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The regenerative capacities of the liver and improvements in surgical techniques have expanded the possibilities of resectability. Liver resection is often the only curative treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, despite the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This serious complication (with a 50% mortality rate) can be avoided by better assessment of liver volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to understand and assess clinical, biological, and imaging predictors of PHLF risk, as well as the various hypertrophy techniques, to achieve an adequate FLR before hepatectomy. METHOD We reviewed the state of the art in liver regeneration and FLR hypertrophy techniques. RESULTS The use of new biological scores (such as the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index + albumin-bilirubin [APRI+ALBI] score), concurrent utilization of 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy (HBS), or dynamic hepatocyte contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for liver volumetry helps predict the risk of PHLF. Besides portal vein embolization, there are other FLR optimization techniques that have their indications in case of risk of failure (e.g., associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, liver venous deprivation) or in specific situations (transarterial radioembolization). CONCLUSION There is a need to standardize volumetry and function measurement techniques, as well as FLR hypertrophy techniques, to limit the risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Boubaddi
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France.
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Arthur Marichez
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bruno Lapuyade
- Radiology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Frederic Debordeaux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ghoufrane Tlili
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Laurence Chiche
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Department, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
- Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, BRIC U1312, INSERM, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pal K, Mahdi Khavandi M, Habibollahi P, Patel M, Ahmed Metwalli Z. Liver Venous Deprivation. ADVANCES IN CLINICAL RADIOLOGY 2024; 6:77-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yacr.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
7
|
Björk D, Hasselgren K, Røsok BI, Larsen PN, Sparrelid E, Lindell G, Schultz NA, Bjørnbeth BA, Isaksson B, Lindhoff Larsson A, Rizell M, Björnsson B, Sandström P. Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Survival Analysis from the Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial LIGRO. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e455. [PMID: 39310365 PMCID: PMC11415122 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) randomized for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). Introduction For advanced CRLM, TSH or ALPPS may be needed for tumor freedom. The randomized, controlled, multicenter trial LIGRO showed an increased resection rate in patients who underwent ALPPS but no difference in morbidity or mortality. The 2-year survival analysis revealed better overall survival in the ALPPS group. Here, the long-term survival analysis from the LIGRO trial is reported. Methods In the LIGRO trial, 100 patients were randomized to TSH or ALPPS, with the option of rescue ALPPS if insufficient growth was found after the initial step of TSH. Patients were enrolled between June 2014 and August 2016. Follow-up data for this study were collected between November 2022 and February 2023. Results In total, 16 patients were alive at the end of the follow-up period. The estimated median follow-up time was 93 months. Estimated median overall survival times were 45 months in the ALPPS group and 27 months in the TSH group (P = 0.057), with 5-year survival rates of 31% and 20%, respectively. Positive prognostic factors were liver tumor-free status at the first follow-up and rectal primary tumor. Negative prognostic factors were extrahepatic disease and increasing CLRM size. Conclusion Liver tumor-free status is a predictor of long-term survival, along with extrahepatic disease, large CRLM size, and rectal primary tumor. Survival did not significantly differ between patients treated with ALPPS or TSH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Björk
- From the Department of Surgery in Linköping and Institution for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Kristina Hasselgren
- From the Department of Surgery in Linköping and Institution for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bård I. Røsok
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter N. Larsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gert Lindell
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nicolai A. Schultz
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bjorn A. Bjørnbeth
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bengt Isaksson
- Department of Surgery, Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Lindhoff Larsson
- From the Department of Surgery in Linköping and Institution for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Magnus Rizell
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- From the Department of Surgery in Linköping and Institution for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Per Sandström
- From the Department of Surgery in Linköping and Institution for Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tebala GD, Avenia S, Cirocchi R, Delvecchio A, Desiderio J, Di Nardo D, Duro F, Gemini A, Giuliante F, Memeo R, Nuzzo G. Turning points in the practice of liver surgery: A historical review. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:271-282. [PMID: 38752233 PMCID: PMC11341877 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The history of liver surgery is a tale of progressive resolution of issues presenting one after another from ancient times to the present days when dealing with liver ailments. The perfect knowledge of human liver anatomy and physiology and the development of a proper liver resective surgery require time and huge efforts and, mostly, the study and research of giants of their own times, whose names are forever associated with anatomical landmarks, thorough descriptions, and surgical approaches. The control of parenchymal bleeding after trauma and during resection is the second issue that surgeons have to resolve. A good knowledge of intra and extrahepatic vascular anatomy is a necessary condition to develop techniques of vascular control, paving the way to liver transplantation. Last but not least, the issue of residual liver function after resection requires advanced techniques of volume redistribution through redirection of blood inflow. These are the same problems any young surgeon would face when approaching liver surgery for the first time. Therefore, obtaining a wide picture of historical evolution of liver surgery could be a great starting point to serve as an example and a guide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefano Avenia
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria della Misericordia” Hospital Trust, Perugia, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria” Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Antonella Delvecchio
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, “F.Miulli” Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria” Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria” Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Francesca Duro
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria” Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gemini
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, “S.Maria” Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, “F.Miulli” Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nuzzo
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ye TW, Fu TW, Du CF, Yue RC, Jiang QT, Zhong ZH, Zhao Q, Zhang CW, Liu J, Liu JW, Luo ZY, Fan XM, Hong DF, Cheng J, Xiao ZQ. Comparison of percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization versus transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy with insufficient future liver remnant. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:985. [PMID: 39123182 PMCID: PMC11312699 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12666-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, both percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition plus portal vein embolization (PALPP) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein embolization (PVE) have been utilized in planned hepatectomy. However, there is a lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness of these two techniques for cases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Patients were categorized into either the PALPP group or the TACE + PVE group. Clinical data, including FLR growth rate, complications, secondary resection rate, and overall survival rate, were compared and analyzed for both groups retrospectively. RESULTS Between December 2014 and October 2021, a total of 29 patients underwent TACE + PVE (n = 12) and PALPP (n = 17). In the TACE + PVE group, 7 patients successfully underwent two-stage hepatectomy, while in the PALPP group, 13 patients underwent the procedure (two-stage resection rate: 58.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.42). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications of one-stage procedures (11.8% vs. 8.3%, P > 0.05) and second-stage resection complication (0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.05) between the TACE + PVE and PALPP groups. However, the PALPP group demonstrated a shorter time to FLR volume growth for second-stage resection (18.5 days vs. 66 days, P = 0.001) and KGR (58.5 ml/week vs. 7.7 ml/week, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with TACE + PVE, PALPP results in a more significant increase in FLR volume and a higher rate of two-stage resection without increasing postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Wei Ye
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Ru-Chi Yue
- Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443000, China
| | - Qi-Tao Jiang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zhi-Hang Zhong
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Qin Zhao
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116000, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zu-Yan Luo
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Fan
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - De-Fei Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine(DeFei Hong), No.3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Zun-Qiang Xiao
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hung KC, Wang HP, Li WF, Lin YC, Wang CC. Single center experience with ALPPS and timing with stage 2 in patients with fibrotic/cirrhotic liver. Updates Surg 2024; 76:1213-1221. [PMID: 38494567 PMCID: PMC11341627 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a novel procedure for major resection in patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Effective FLR augmentation is pivotal in the completion of ALPPS. Liver fibrosis/cirrhosis associated with chronic viral hepatitis impairs liver regeneration. To investigate the augmentation of FLR in associating ALPPS between patients with fibrotic/cirrhotic livers (FL) and non-fibrotic livers (NFL) and compare their short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival. Patients were divided into two groups based on the Ishak modified staging: non-fibrotic liver group (NFL, stage 0) and fibrotic/cirrhotic liver group (FL, stage 1-5/6). Weekly liver regeneration in FLR, perioperative data, and survival outcomes were investigated. Twenty-seven patients with liver tumors underwent ALPPS (NFL, n = 7; FL, n = 20). NFL and FL patients had viral hepatitis (28.6% [n = 2] and 95% [n = 19]), absolute FLR volume increments of 134.90 ml and 161.85 ml (p = 0.825), and rates of hypertrophy were 16.46 ml/day and 13.66 ml/day (p = 0.507), respectively. In the FL group, baseline FLR volume was 360.13 ml, postoperatively it increased to a plateau (542.30 ml) in week 2 and declined (378.45 ml) in week 3. One patient (3.7%) with cirrhotic liver (stage 6) failed to proceed to ALPPS-II. The overall ALPPS-related major complication rate was 7.4%. ALPPS is feasible for fibrotic liver patients classified by Ishak modified stages ≤ 5. After ALPPS-I, 14 days for FLR augmentation seems an appropriate waiting time to reach a maximum FLR volume in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo-Chen Hung
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyüan, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Ping Wang
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyüan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Feng Li
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyüan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Cheng Lin
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyüan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chi Wang
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Song, Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan.
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyüan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kron P, Lodge P. New trends in surgery for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:553-565. [PMID: 38957562 PMCID: PMC11216794 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
By presenting the most up-to-date findings and incorporating the latest evidence, this article seeks to present a comprehensive guide for navigating the complexities inherent in the management of colorectal liver metastasis. It aims to serve as a valuable resource offering clinicians and healthcare professionals an understanding of the diverse modalities and approaches available for treating this challenging and multifaceted disease. In an era of rapidly evolving medical knowledge, this article examines the latest insights to make informed decisions in the realm of colorectal liver metastasis management. The article does not only highlight the up-to-date knowledge but also provides the evidence for existing therapeutic strategies. This practical tool provides evidence-based recommendations to clinicians, thereby contributing to the ongoing advancement of effective treatment strategies for this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kron
- Department for General and Transplantation SurgeryUniversity Hospital TuebingenTuebingenGermany
| | - Peter Lodge
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawaguchi S, Onozawa S, Momose H, Matsuki R, Kogure M, Suzuki Y, Sakamoto Y. Rescue of outflow block of the remnant left liver after extended right hemihepatectomy for resection of a tumor in the caudate lobe. Glob Health Med 2024; 6:222-224. [PMID: 38947414 PMCID: PMC11197159 DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2023.01105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Outflow block of the liver is a life-threatening event after living donor liver transplantation. Herein, we rescued a patient suffering from the outflow block of the remnant left hemiliver caused by bending of the left hepatic vein (LHV) after right hemihepatectomy plus caudate lobectomy combined with resection of the middle hepatic vein (MHV). A metastatic tumor sized 6 cm in the caudate lobe of the liver involving the root of the MHV was found in a 50's year old patient after resection of a right breast cancer eight years ago. Right hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy combined with resection of the MHV was performed using a two-stage hepatectomy (partial TIPE ALPPS). On day 1, the total bilirubin value increased to 4.5 mg/dL, and a dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan showed the bent LHV. On the diagnosis of outflow block of the left liver, a self-expandable metallic stent was placed in the LHV using an interventional approach, and the pressure in the LHV decreased from 27 cmH2O to 12 cmH2O. The bilirubin value decreased to 1.2 mg/dL on day 3. Outflow block of the LHV can happen after extended right hemihepatectomy with resection of the MHV. Early diagnosis and interventional stenting treatment can rescue the patient from congestive liver failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shohei Kawaguchi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Onozawa
- Department of Radiology, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Momose
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryota Matsuki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaharu Kogure
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Suzuki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, Chara C, de Santibañes M, Sánchez Clariá R, Pekolj J, de Santibañes E. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better oncological outcomes after ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases. Updates Surg 2024; 76:855-868. [PMID: 38647857 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01835-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
ALPPS enables complete tumor resection in a shorter interval and a larger number of patients than classic two-stage hepatectomies. However, there is little evidence regarding long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of ALPPS in patients with CRM. Single-cohort, prospective, observational study. Patients with unresectable CLM due to insufficient liver remnant who underwent ALPPS between June 2011 and June 2021 were included. Of 32 patients treated, 21 were male (66%) and the median age was 56 years (range = 29-81). Both stages were completed in 30 patients (93.7%), with an R0 rate of 75% (24/32). Major morbidity was 37.5% and the mortality nil. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 28.1 and 8.8 months, respectively. The 1-3, and 5-year OS was 86%, 45%, and 21%, and RFS was 42%, 14%, and 14%, respectively. The only independent risk factor associated with poor RFS (5.7 vs 11.6 months; p = 0.038) and OS (15 vs 37 months; p = 0.009) was not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS from disease diagnosis (24.3 vs. 38.9 months; p = 0.025). ALPPS is associated with favorable oncological outcomes, comparable to traditional strategies to increase resectability in patients with CLM and high tumor burden. Our results suggest for the first time that adjuvant chemotherapy is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes after ALPPS. Selection of patients with KRAS mutations should be performed with caution, as this could affect oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando A Alvarez
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Camila Chara
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin de Santibañes
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Clariá
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- General Surgery Service, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Section and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Juan D. Perón 4190, C1181AC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Madadi-Sanjani O, Ure BM. Benchmarks for Pediatric Surgical Registries: Recommendations for the Assessment and Grading of Complications. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2024; 34:182-188. [PMID: 37871645 DOI: 10.1055/a-2196-1755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Procedure-related registries in general surgical practice offer a platform for prospective trials, the pooling of data, and detailed outcome analysis. Recommendations by the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) collaboration and Outcome4Medicine have further improved the uniform reporting of complications and adverse events.In the pediatric surgical network, disease-specific registries for rare and inherited congenital anomalies are gaining importance, fostering international collaborations on studies of low-incidence diseases. However, to date, reporting of complications in the pediatric surgical registries has been inconsistent. Therefore, the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) recently endorsed the validation of the first severity grading system for children. The planned reform of the European Paediatric Surgical Audit (EPSA) registry, which includes the implementation of the Clavien-Madadi classification, represents a further effort to establish uniform outcome reporting.This article provides an overview of experiences with surgical registries and complication reporting, along with the potential application of this knowledge to future pediatric surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benno M Ure
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Golriz M, Ramouz A, Hammad A, Aminizadeh E, Sabetkish N, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Carvalho C, Rio-Tinto H, Chang DH, Joao AA, Goncalves G, Mehrabi A. Promising Results of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma in a Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:771. [PMID: 38398162 PMCID: PMC10887221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ALPPS popularity is increasing among surgeons worldwide and its indications are expanding to cure patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors. Few reports recommended limitations or even contraindications of ALPPS in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCC). Here, we discuss the results of ALPPS in patients with phCC in a systematic review as well as a pooled data analysis. METHODS MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant literature up to December 2023. All studies reporting ALPPS in the management of phCC were included. A single-arm meta-analysis of proportions was carried out to estimate the overall rate of outcomes. RESULTS After obtaining 207 articles from the primary search, data of 18 studies containing 112 phCC patients were included in our systematic review. Rates of major morbidity and mortality were calculated to be 43% and 22%, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed a PHLF rate of 23%. One-year disease-free survival was 65% and one-year overall survival was 69%. CONCLUSIONS ALPPS provides a good chance of cure for patients with phCC in comparison to alternative treatment options, but at the expense of debatable morbidity and mortality. With refinement of the surgical technique and better perioperative patient management, the results of ALPPS in patients with phCC were improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Clinic of General and Visceral Surgery, Diakonie in Südwestfallen, 57076 Siegen, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Ahmed Hammad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Nastaran Sabetkish
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Carlos Carvalho
- Digestive Oncology Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal;
| | - Hugo Rio-Tinto
- Department of Radiology, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal;
| | - De-Hua Chang
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ana Alagoa Joao
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.A.J.); (G.G.)
| | - Gil Goncalves
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal; (A.A.J.); (G.G.)
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (A.R.); (A.H.); (E.A.); (N.S.); (E.K.); (O.G.)
- Liver Cancer Centre Heidelberg (LCCH), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kron P, Lodge JPA. Changing perspectives in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad431. [PMID: 38198156 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kron
- Department for Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department for General and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J Peter A Lodge
- HPB and Transplant Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Butensky SD, Billingsley KG, Khan SA. Reasonable expansion of surgical candidates for HCC treatment. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0153. [PMID: 38720794 PMCID: PMC11078523 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
|
20
|
Della Corte A, Santangelo D, Augello L, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Canevari C, Gusmini S, Guazzarotti G, Palumbo D, Chiti A, Aldrighetti L, De Cobelli F. Single-Center Retrospective Study Comparing Double Vein Embolization via a Trans-Jugular Approach with Liver Venous Deprivation via a Trans-Hepatic Approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:1703-1712. [PMID: 37704862 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03538-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare safety, technical and clinical outcomes of double vein embolization (DVE) via a trans-jugular approach with liver venous deprivation (LVD) via a trans-hepatic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing simultaneous portal and hepatic veins embolization in view of a major hepatectomy (June 2019-November 2022). Hepatic vein embolization was performed either by transjugular plug (DVE) or by transhepatic plug followed by glue injection (LVD). Inclusion criteria were availability of pre-procedural CT scan, and availability of CT scans acquired 10 days and 25 days post-procedure. Comparative data included complication rate, fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), Future Liver Remnant volume and function increase (FLR-V and FLR-F increase, respectively) and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-six patients (n = 14 DVE; n = 22 LVD) were included. No baseline significant differences were observed among the two groups. One grade-3 complication (2.8%) was observed in the LVD group; one case of technical failure (2.8%) was observed in the DVE group. Fluoroscopy time and DAP were similar between DVE and LVD (29 ± 17.7 vs. 25 ± 8.2 min, p = 0.97; 105.1 ± 63.5 vs. 143.4 ± 79.5 Gy·cm2, p = 0.15). No differences arose at either time-point in FLR-V increase (46.7 ± 23.1% vs. 48.2 ± 28.2%, 52.9 ± 30.9% vs. 53.2 ± 29%, respectively, p = 0.9). FLR-F increase also did not differ significantly (62.8 ± 55.2 vs. 67.4 ± 57.5, p = 0.9). No differences in drop-out rate from surgery were observed. (28.6% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.93). One case of grade-B post-hepatectomy liver failure (2.8%) was observed in the LVD group. CONCLUSION LVD via transhepatic approach and DVE via transjugular approach seem equally safe and effective. Level of Evidence Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Della Corte
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Domenico Santangelo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Augello
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carla Canevari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Gusmini
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Guazzarotti
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Palumbo
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Selmani R, Karadzov Z, Begovic G, Rushiti Q, Memeti S, Dimitrova MG, Spirovska T, Atanasova M, Selmani A. ALPPS Procedure for the Treatment of Bilobar Multiple Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: First Case in RN Macedonia. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki) 2023; 44:97-106. [PMID: 38109444 DOI: 10.2478/prilozi-2023-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: ALPPS (Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy), is a recently developed procedure, first performed by HJ Schlitt in Regensburg, Germany. The technique developed two stages of hepatectomy. The ALPPS procedure has been introduced to increase the volume of future liver remnant, much more than the other technique, such as PVE (portal vein embolization). The first ALPPS in our country was introduced and performed by our team on May 15th, 2018. Results: The 60-year-old patient was previously operated on for rectal cancer in 2017 at another institution. The operation was performed with anterior resection and the patient was in long term adjuvant chemotherapy. One year after surgery, the patient has multiple bilobar liver metastases and increased tumor markers that led to instant admission to our institution for liver resection. In the first stage, we performed four metastasectomies on the left lobe with right portal vein ligation and transection on the Cantlie line. The second stage was performed after a CT evaluation on the eighth day, with significant hypertrophy on the left lobe. Pathological findings reported ten metastases on the right lobe with a diameter 1-3 cm. The patient was on the long-term chemotherapy, and after one year he had other MS in the IVa segment of the liver. We also performed a metastasectomy. The patient died 32 months after ALPPS. Conclusion: ALPPS is a safe and feasible procedure for the treatment of bilobar liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. It could provide long-term survival for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rexhep Selmani
- 1University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Medical faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Zoran Karadzov
- 1University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Medical faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Goran Begovic
- 1University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Medical faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Qemal Rushiti
- 1University Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Medical faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Shaban Memeti
- 2University Clinic of Pediatric Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Magdalena G Dimitrova
- 3University Clinic of Gasteroenterohepatology, Medical Faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | - Tanja Spirovska
- 4University Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology and intensive care, Medical Faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| | | | - Arian Selmani
- 6University Clinic of Cardiovascular surgery, Medical Faculty, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius" Skopje
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Ramouz A, Khajeh E, Hammad A, Hackert T, Müller-Stich B, Strobel O, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Ghamarnejad O, Al-Saeedi M, Springfeld C, Rupp C, Mayer P, Mieth M, Goeppert B, Hoffmann K, Büchler MW. Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5613. [PMID: 38067316 PMCID: PMC10705795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Hammad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Goeppert
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Hoffmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W. Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kambakamba P, Schneider MA, Linecker M, Kirimker EO, Moeckli B, Graf R, Reiner CS, Nguyen-Kim TDL, Kologlu M, Karayalcin K, Clavien PA, Balci D, Petrowsky H. Early Postoperative Serum Phosphate Drop Predicts Sufficient Hypertrophy After Liver Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:763-771. [PMID: 37465990 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative hypophosphatemia on liver regeneration after major liver surgery in the scenario of Associating Liver Partition with Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and living liver donation (LLD). BACKGROUND Hypophosphatemia has been described to reflect the metabolic demands of regenerating hepatocytes. Both ALPPS and LLD are characterized by an exceptionally strong liver regeneration and may be of particular interest in the context of posthepatectomy hypophosphatemia. METHODS Serum phosphate changes within the first 7 postoperative days after ALPPS (n=61) and LLD (n=54) were prospectively assessed and correlated with standardized volumetry after 1 week. In a translational approach, postoperative phosphate changes were investigated in mice and in vitro . RESULTS After ALPPS stage 1 and LLD, serum phosphate levels significantly dropped from a preoperative median of 1.08 mmol/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.92-1.23] and 1.07 mmol/L (IQR 0.91-1.21) to a postoperative median nadir of 0.68 and 0.52 mmol/L, respectively. A pronounced phosphate drop correlated well with increased liver hypertrophy ( P <0.001). Patients with a low drop of phosphate showed a higher incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure after ALPPS (7% vs 31%, P =0.041). Like in humans, phosphate drop correlated significantly with degree of hypertrophy in murine ALPPS and hepatectomy models ( P <0.001). Blocking phosphate transporter (Slc20a1) inhibited cellular phosphate uptake and hepatocyte proliferation in vitro. CONCLUSION Phosphate drop after hepatectomy is a direct surrogate marker for liver hypertrophy. Perioperative implementation of serum phosphate analysis has the potential to detect patients with insufficient regenerative capacity at an early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patryk Kambakamba
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Hepatobiliary Group, St. Vincents's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Marcel A Schneider
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Elvan Onur Kirimker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Beat Moeckli
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rolf Graf
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cäcilia S Reiner
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Meltem Kologlu
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kaan Karayalcin
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Balci
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jena SS, Mehta NN, Nundy S. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Controversies and recommendations. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:227-240. [PMID: 37408334 PMCID: PMC10472117 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hilar cholangiocarcinomas are highly aggressive malignancies. They are usually at an advanced stage at initial presentation. Surgical resection with negative margins is the standard of management. It provides the only chance of cure. Liver transplantation has increased the number of 'curative' procedures for cases previously considered to be unresectable. Meticulous and thorough preoperative planning is required to prevent fatal post-operative complications. Extended resection procedures, including hepatic trisectionectomy for Bismuth type IV tumors, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors with extensive longitudinal spread, and combined vascular resection with reconstruction for tumors involving hepatic vascular structures, are challenging procedures with surgical indications expanded. Liver transplantation after the standardization of a neoadjuvant protocol described by the Mayo Clinic has increased the number of patients who can undergo operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvendu Sekhar Jena
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Naimish N Mehta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Samiran Nundy
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Wakabayashi G, Han HS, Palanivelu C, Boggi U, Hackert T, Kim HJ, Wang XY, Hu MG, Choi GH, Panaro F, He J, Efanov M, Yin XY, Croner RS, Fong YM, Zhu JY, Wu Z, Sun CD, Lee JH, Marino MV, Ganpati IS, Zhu P, Wang ZZ, Yang KH, Fan J, Chen XP, Lau WY. International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4815-4830. [PMID: 37701136 PMCID: PMC10494765 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The robotic liver resection (RLR) has been increasingly applied in recent years and its benefits shown in some aspects owing to the technical advancement of robotic surgical system, however, controversies still exist. Based on the foundation of the previous consensus statement, this new consensus document aimed to update clinical recommendations and provide guidance to improve the outcomes of RLR clinical practice. The guideline steering group and guideline expert group were formed by 29 international experts of liver surgery and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Relevant literature was reviewed and analyzed by the evidence evaluation group. According to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, the Guidance Principles of Development and Amendment of the Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment in China 2022, a total of 14 recommendations were generated. Among them were 8 recommendations formulated by the GRADE method, and the remaining 6 recommendations were formulated based on literature review and experts' opinion due to insufficient EBM results. This international experts consensus guideline offered guidance for the safe and effective clinical practice and the research direction of RLR in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic, Robotic & Laparoscopic Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia 25100, Italy
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama 362-0075, Japan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- GEM Hospital & Research Centre, GEM Hospital & Research Centre, Coimbatore 641045, India
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa 56126, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20251, Germany
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu 42415, South Korea
| | - Xiao-Ying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Ming-Gen Hu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Surgery/Division of Robotic and HBP Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital-School of Medicine, Montpellier 34090, France
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow 111123, Russia
| | - Xiao-Yu Yin
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Roland S Croner
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg 39120, Germany
| | - Yu-Man Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Ji-Ye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Chuan-Dong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan 682, South Korea
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, F. Tappeiner Hospital, Merano 39012, Italy
| | - Iyer Shridhar Ganpati
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore 189969, Singapore
| | - Peng Zhu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zi-Zheng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Senior Department of Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200000, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430000, Hubei Province, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Knapen RRMM, Korenblik R, James S, Dams G, Olij B, de Boer SW, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. The Effect of Microwave and Radiofrequency Ablation (MWA/RFA) on Liver Volume in Patients with Primary and Secondary Liver Tumours: A Retrospective Analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03503-0. [PMID: 37430014 PMCID: PMC10382361 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03503-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is known that thermal liver ablation can induce liver hypertrophy. However, exact impact in liver volume remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of radiofrequency or microwave ablation (RFA/MWA) on liver volume in patients with primary and secondary liver lesions. Findings can be relevant in assessing the potential extra benefit of thermal liver ablation in preoperatively performed liver hypertrophy inducing procedures, such as portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS Between January 2014-May 2022, 69 invasive treatment naïve patients with primary (n = 43) or secondary/metastatic (n = 26) liver lesions (in all segments, except in segments II/III) treated percutaneously by RFA/MWA were included. Total liver volume (TLV), segment II + III volume (serving as "distant liver volume"), ablation zone volume and absolute liver volume (ALV, calculated by subtracting the ablation zone volume from the TLV) were the study outcomes. RESULTS ALV in patients with secondary liver lesions increased to a median percentage of 106.87% (IQR = 99.66-113.03%, p = 0.016), volume of segments II/III increased to a median percentage of 105.81% (IQR = 100.06-115.65%, p = 0.003). ALV and segments II/III in patients with primary liver tumours remained stable, with a median percentage of 98.72% (IQR = 92.99-108.35%, p = 0.856) and 100.43% (IQR = 92.85-109.41%, p = 0.699), respectively. CONCLUSION In patients with secondary liver tumours, ALV and segments II/III increased after MWA/RFA by an average of approximately 6%, while ALV in patients with primary liver lesions remained unchanged. Besides the curative intent, these findings indicate the potential added benefit of thermal liver ablation on FLR hypertrophy inducing procedures in patients with secondary liver lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3, non-controlled retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robrecht R M M Knapen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Remon Korenblik
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sinead James
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Dams
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Zuyderland, Sittard, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne W de Boer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Serenari M, Ratti F, Guglielmo N, Zanello M, Mocchegiani F, Lenzi J, Colledan M, Mazzaferro V, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Cescon M, Di Benedetto F, Massani M, Grazi G, Valle RD, Vivarelli M, Ettorre GM, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5285-5294. [PMID: 36976422 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2012, Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has encountered several modifications of its original technique. The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the trend of ALPPS in Italy over a 10-year period. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors affecting the risk of morbidity/mortality/post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS Data of patients submitted to ALPPS between 2012 and 2021 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry and evaluation of time trends was performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2021, a total of 268 ALPPS were performed within 17 centers. The number of ALPPS divided by the total number of liver resections performed by each center slightly declined (APC = - 2.0%, p = 0.111). Minimally invasive (MI) approach significantly increased over the years (APC = + 49.5%, p = 0.002). According to multivariable analysis, MI completion of stage 1 was protective against 90-day mortality (OR = 0.05, p = 0.040) as well as enrollment within high-volume centers for liver surgery (OR = 0.32, p = 0.009). Use of interstage hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and biliary tumors were independent predictors of PHLF. CONCLUSIONS This national study showed that use of ALPPS only slightly declined over the years with an increased use of MI techniques, leading to lower 90-day mortality. PHLF still remains an open issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Guglielmo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2 - Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gianluca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Du S, Wang Z, Lin D. A bibliometric and visualized analysis of preoperative future liver remnant augmentation techniques from 1997 to 2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1185885. [PMID: 37333827 PMCID: PMC10272555 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The size and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration for both eligibility for treatment and postoperative prognosis when planning surgical hepatectomy. Over time, a variety of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques have been investigated, from the earliest portal vein embolization (PVE) to the more recent Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) procedures. Despite numerous publications on this topic, no bibliometric analysis has yet been conducted. Methods Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched to identify studies related to preoperative FLR augmentation techniques published from 1997 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the CiteSpace [version 6.1.R6 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer [version 1.6.19]. Results A total of 973 academic studies were published by 4431 authors from 920 institutions in 51 countries/regions. The University of Zurich was the most published institution while Japan was the most productive country. Eduardo de Santibanes had the most published articles, and Masato Nagino was the most frequently co-cited author. The most frequently published journal was HPB, and the most cited journal was Ann Surg, with 8088 citations. The main aspects of preoperative FLR augmentation technique is to enhance surgical technology, expand clinical indications, prevent and treat postoperative complications, ensure long-term survival, and evaluate the growth rate of FLR. Recently, hot keywords in this field include ALPPS, LVD, and Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques, offering valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this field.
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali Deeb A, Rauchfuß F, Gaßler N, Dondorf F, Rohland O, Tannapfel A, Settmacher U. Liver regeneration after two-stage liver transplantation is more effective than after other preconditioning procedures in colorectal liver metastases. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:615-624. [PMID: 36349494 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Induction of liver regeneration represents an option to expand the resectability in patients with expected small future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this cohort-study is to compare the liver regeneration between different surgical procedures, including novel procedures such as two-stage living donor liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts. METHODS Forty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases were included between 2004 and 2020. They underwent one of the following three procedures: portal vein embolization (PVE), associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and living donor two-stage liver transplantation (LT). The volume gain of the future liver remnant was analyzed in comparison between the three mentioned procedures. RESULTS The type of surgery performed had a significant correlation with liver regeneration with a strong effect on the benefit of ALPPS and liver transplantation, respectively (r = .6, p = .00003). The type of surgery was the only independent co-factor in the multiple regression, which showed a significant influence on FLR-increase favoring two-stage transplantation compared to the other two related procedures (ß = .12, T = 3.9, p = .0004). The histological and immunohistochemical studies also showed a clear advantage of proliferation to the benefits of two-stage liver transplantation compared with ALPPS. CONCLUSION Two-stage liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts induces better FLR-increase than portal vein embolization or ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aladdin Ali Deeb
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Falk Rauchfuß
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Gaßler
- Institute of Pathology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Felix Dondorf
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Oliver Rohland
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang L, He A, Lei J, Liao W. Robotic hepatectomy: challenge and progression. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12:264-266. [PMID: 37124691 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-22-50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ligan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Aoxiao He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jun Lei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Wenjun Liao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yamamura K, Beppu T, Miyata T, Okabe H, Imai K, Ishiko T. A novel comprehensive ALPPS preoperative risk assessment (CAPRA) score is beneficial in creating a treatment strategy for advanced liver malignancy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12:287-290. [PMID: 37124688 PMCID: PMC10129880 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-23-121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Yamamura
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
| | - Toru Beppu
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Miyata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hirohisa Okabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takatoshi Ishiko
- Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Yamaga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bozkurt E, Sijberden JP, Abu Hilal M. Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Right or Extended Right Hemi Hepatectomy Following Modulation of the Future Liver Remnant in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023. [PMID: 37015071 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Major hepatectomies after future liver remnant (FLR) modulation are technically demanding procedures, especially when performed as minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to assess current evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation. Materials and Methods: The Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for studies involving laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomies after FLR modulation, from their inception to December 2021. Two reviewers independently selected eligible articles and assessed their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from the included studies and summarized. Results: Six studies were included. In these studies, the median length of stay after the second stage ranged from 4.5 to 15.5 days and postoperative complication rates between 4.5% and 42.8%. Overall, 7.4% of patients developed liver failure, and 90-day mortality occurred in 3.2% of patients. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. Only one study reported long-term outcomes, describing comparable 3-year overall survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgery (80% versus 54%, P = .154). Conclusions: The current evidence is scarce, but it suggests that in experienced centers, laparoscopic right or extended right hemihepatectomy, following FLR modulation, is a safe and feasible procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Bozkurt
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jasper P Sijberden
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Calderon Novoa F, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Goransky J, Mazza O, Sánchez Claria R, de Santibañes M. Pushing the Limits of Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: How Far Can We Go? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072113. [PMID: 37046774 PMCID: PMC10093442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Calderon Novoa
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Jeremias Goransky
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Oscar Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Martín de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cioffi L, Belli G, Izzo F, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Russo G, Patrone R, Granata V, Belli A. Minimally Invasive ALPPS Procedure: A Review of Feasibility and Short-Term Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061700. [PMID: 36980586 PMCID: PMC10046857 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) represents a recent strategy to improve resectability of extensive hepatic malignancies. Recent surgical advances, such as the application of technical variants and use of a mini-invasive approach (MI-ALPPS), have been proposed to improve clinical outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality. Methods: A total of 119 MI-ALPPS cases from 6 series were identified and discussed to evaluate the feasibility of the procedure and short-term clinical outcomes. Results: Hepatocellular carcinoma were widely the most common indication for MI-ALPPS. The median estimated blood loss was 260 mL during Stage 1 and 1625 mL in Stage 2. The median length of the procedures was 230 min in Stage 1 and 184 in Stage 2. The median increase ratio of future liver remnant volume was 87.8%. The median major morbidity was 8.14% in Stage 1 and 23.39 in Stage 2. The mortality rate was 0.6%. Conclusions: MI-ALPPS appears to be a feasible and safe procedure, with potentially better short-term outcomes in terms of blood loss, morbidity, and mortality rate if compared with those of open series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Cioffi
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-81-18775110
| | - Giulio Belli
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Loreto Nuovo Hospital, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Corrado Fantini
- Department of General Surgery, Pellegrini Hospital, 80134 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of General Surgery, Pellegrini Hospital, 80134 Naples, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Díaz Vico T, Granero Castro P, Alcover Navarro L, Suárez Sánchez A, Mihic Góngora L, Montalvá Orón EM, Maupoey Ibáñez J, Truán Alonso N, González-Pinto Arrillaga I, Granero Trancón JE. Two stage hepatectomy (TSH) versus ALPPS for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:550-559. [PMID: 36424260 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although numerous comparisons between conventional Two Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) have been reported, the heterogeneity of malignancies previously compared represents an important source of selection bias. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between TSH and ALPPS to treat patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). METHODS Main electronic databases were searched using medical subject headings for CRLM surgically treated with TSH or ALPPS. Patients treated for primary or secondary liver malignancies other than CRLM were excluded. RESULTS A total of 335 patients from 5 studies were included. Postoperative major complications were higher in the ALPPS group (relative risk [RR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.06, I2 = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of perioperative mortality (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.64-3.62, I2 = 0%). ALPPS was associated with higher completion of hepatectomy rates (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.61, I2 = 85%), as well as R0 resection rates (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.30, I2 = 40%). Nevertheless, no significant differences were achieved between groups in terms of overall survival (OS) (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, I2 = 52%) and disease-free survival (DFS) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.47-2.49, I2 = 54%), respectively. CONCLUSION ALPPS and TSH to treat CRLM seem to have comparable operative risks in terms of mortality rates. No definitive conclusions regarding OS and DFS can be drawn from the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Díaz Vico
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Health Research Institute of the Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Spain.
| | - Pablo Granero Castro
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain
| | - Laura Alcover Navarro
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Aida Suárez Sánchez
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Agustín (HUSA), Avilés, Spain
| | - Luka Mihic Góngora
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Eva María Montalvá Orón
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Maupoey Ibáñez
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nuria Truán Alonso
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Ignacio González-Pinto Arrillaga
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain; Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain
| | - José Electo Granero Trancón
- Department of Surgery, University of Oviedo, Spain; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kobayashi K, Inoue Y, Kitano Y, Sato S, Oba A, Ono Y, Sato T, Ito H, Mise Y, Saiura A, Takahashi Y. Optimizing the selection of technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Surgery 2023; 173:442-449. [PMID: 36384649 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prediction of conversion surgery in patients with technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases has not been generalized or well-established. We developed a predictive model for conversion surgery and assessed the long-term outcomes of patients with technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases. METHODS In this single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed the perioperative parameters and outcomes of 892 consecutive patients (2014-2021). Conversion surgery was indicated when the chemotherapy response allowed the complete resection of colorectal liver metastases with negative margins and adequate remnant liver volume. RESULTS Of the 892 patients, 122 had technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases; 61 underwent conversion surgery (conversion surgery group) and 61 did not (nonconversion surgery group). The median overall survival was significantly higher in the conversion surgery group than in the nonconversion surgery group (5.6 vs 1.8 years, P < .001). After univariate and multivariate analyses, the predictive model for conversion surgery was constructed using 4 predictive factors: Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog status (mutant, +2 points), tumor number (≥15, +1), hepatic vein contact (≥2 hepatic veins, +1), and the presence of preservable sections (absence of preservable sections, +2). The area under the curve for conversion surgery was 0.889. Patients were graded according to the scores (A [0-2], B [3-4], and C [5-6]), and the conversion rates were 91.5% (A), 32.6% (B), and 10.3% (C) (P < .001). Grade A patients (median survival time, 5.7 years) had significantly better overall survival than grade B and C patients (median survival time, 2.2 and 1.6 years, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent conversion surgery for technically unresectable colorectal liver metastases had better prognoses, and our novel predictive model was useful in predicting conversion surgery and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Kobayashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yuki Kitano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoki Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stavrou GA, Kardassis D, Blatt LA, Gharbi A, Donati M. Modified ALPPS as an individual rescue treatment strategy for resection of Klatskin tumors. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:85-87. [PMID: 35941022 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor A Stavrou
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Saarbruecken, Germany.
| | - Dimitrios Kardassis
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | - Laura Ann Blatt
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | - Akram Gharbi
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Klinikum Saarbruecken, Saarbruecken, Germany
| | - Marcello Donati
- Department of Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Procopio F, Famularo S, Branciforte B, Corleone P, Cimino M, Viganò L, Donadon M, Torzilli G. Transversal hepatectomies: Classification and intention-to-treat validation of new parenchyma-sparing procedures for deep-located hepatic tumors. Surgery 2023; 173:412-419. [PMID: 36031448 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep-located liver tumors involving hepatic veins at the caval confluence or main Glissonean pedicles generally require a major hepatectomy. An intraoperative ultrasound guidance policy opened a possibility to opt for parenchyma-sparing procedures as alternatives to major hepatectomy, called transversal hepatectomies. We ought to standardize the procedure and analyze the surgical outcome, oncological suitability, and salvageability. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. All consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomies for liver tumors between January 2005 and August 2020 were reviewed. Transversal hepatectomies were classified as follows: upper transversal hepatectomy: resection of the posterosuperior segments along with at least 1 hepatic vein and preservation of the anteroinferior ones; roller coaster hepatectomy: transversal hepatectomy with tumor vessel detachment from at least 2 hepatic veins; and lower transversal hepatectomy: amputation of the distal portion of at least 1 hepatic vein with tumor vessel detachment from first/second-order Glissonean pedicles. Morbidity, mortality, local recurrences, and salvageability in cases of relapse were considered. RESULTS A total of 61 transversal hepatectomies were performed: 40 (66%) upper transversal hepatectomies, 19 (31%) roller coaster hepatectomies, and 2 (3%) lower transversal hepatectomies. The median preserved liver volume was 67% (range 41-86). Mortality was 0, and major morbidity was 6%. Local recurrence occurred in 7 (11%) patients. Ten out of 34 (29%) patients with liver-only recurrence received redo surgery. CONCLUSION Transversal hepatectomies offer a new parenchyma-sparing perspective for the management of complex tumor presentation, which would otherwise demand major tissue removal or even unresectability. Safety, adequate local control, and salvageability are further pillars of this approach herein systematized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Procopio
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Famularo
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruno Branciforte
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pio Corleone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Cimino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Viganò
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cutolo C, Fusco R, Simonetti I, De Muzio F, Grassi F, Trovato P, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Maggialetti N, Borgheresi A, Bruno A, Chiti G, Bicci E, Brunese MC, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, Barile A, Izzo F, Granata V. Imaging Features of Main Hepatic Resections: The Radiologist Challenging. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13010134. [PMID: 36675795 PMCID: PMC9862253 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver resection is still the most effective treatment of primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and of metastatic disease, such as colorectal liver metastases. The type of liver resection (anatomic versus non anatomic resection) depends on different features, mainly on the type of malignancy (primary liver neoplasm versus metastatic lesion), size of tumor, its relation with blood and biliary vessels, and the volume of future liver remnant (FLT). Imaging plays a critical role in postoperative assessment, offering the possibility to recognize normal postoperative findings and potential complications. Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool to use in post-surgical phase. However, computed tomography (CT), due to its comprehensive assessment, allows for a more accurate evaluation and more normal findings than the possible postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or hepatospecific contrast agents remains the best tool for bile duct injuries diagnosis and for ischemic cholangitis evaluation. Consequently, radiologists should be familiar with the surgical approaches for a better comprehension of normal postoperative findings and of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80127 Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Maggialetti
- Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs (DSMBNOS), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiti
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Epatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hu Q, Zeng Z, Zhang Y, Fan X. Study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation combined with portal vein embolization for rapid future liver remnant increase of planned hepatectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 12:926810. [PMID: 36686725 PMCID: PMC9846746 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (PMA) combined with portal vein embolization (PVE) for planned hepatectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed data of 18 patients with multiple right liver tumors or hilar tumor of liver invades the surrounding tissue and insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) for hepatectomy from July 2015 to March 2017. Ultrasound-guided PMA was performed by using PMCT cold circulation microwave treatment apparatus. PVE was performed after PMA. The increase of FLR was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) 6-22 days after PVE. The proportion of FLR, increase in the amplitude of FLR, procedure-related complications, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and overall survival (OS) rates, the median survival time were analyzed. Results The median volume of FLR before PMA and PVE was 369.7 ml (range: 239.4-493.1 ml). After a median waiting period of 11.5 days (range: 6-22 days), the median volume of FLR was increased to 523.4 ml (range: 355.4-833.3 ml). The changes in FLR before and after PMA and PVE were statistically significant (p<0.001). No serious perioperative complications or mortality were found. After a median follow-up time of 51.0 months (range: 2-54 months), the 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 4-year survival rates were 88.9%, 72.2%, 44.4%, 33.3%, 22.2%, respectively, and the median survival time was 15.0 ± 7.1 months. Conclusion PMA combined with PVE increases FLR rapidly, avoids touching malignant tumors, and produces fewer procedure-related complications. It appears safe and efficacious for planned hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaohong Hu
- Cancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zeng Zeng
- Cancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuanbiao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaoming Fan
- Cancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China,*Correspondence: Xiaoming Fan,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lv JH, Chen WZ, Li YN, Wang JX, Fu YK, Zeng ZX, Wu JY, Wang SJ, Huang XX, Huang LM, Huang RF, Wei YG, Yan ML. Should associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy be applied to hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis? A multi-center study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2175-2184. [PMID: 36280426 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can be performed in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis. We explored the efficacy of ALPPS in HCC patients. METHODS Data of 54 patients who underwent ALPPS between August 2014 and July 2020 at three centers were collected. Adverse factors affecting their prognosis were analyzed and subsequently compared with 184 patients who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). RESULTS Overall survival rates of the ALPPS group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 70.6%, 38.4%, and 31.7%, respectively; corresponding disease-free survival rates were 50.5%, 22.4%, and 19.2%, respectively. The ALPPS group had a significantly greater long-term survival rate than the TACE group (before propensity score matching, P < 0.001; after propensity score matching, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that multifocal lesions (P = 0.018) and macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.001) were prognostic factors for HCC patients who underwent ALPPS. After the propensity score matching, the multifocal lesions (P = 0.031), macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.003), and treatment type (ALPPS/TACE) (P = 0.026) were the factors adversely affecting the prognosis of HCC patients. CONCLUSION ALPPS was feasible in hepatitis B virus-related HCC patients with cirrhosis and resulted in better survival than TACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Hui Lv
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei-Zhao Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yi-Nan Li
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jin-Xiu Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yang-Kai Fu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Xin Zeng
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Yi Wu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuang-Jia Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiao-Xiao Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Li-Ming Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rong-Fa Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yong-Gang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Mao-Lin Yan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ishihara M, Takahashi Y, Matsuo K, Nakamura A, Togo S, Tanaka K. Modification of ALPPS to avoid ischemia and congestion after stage 1: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2022; 8:137. [PMID: 35867313 PMCID: PMC9307701 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01490-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been advocated for treating advanced liver tumors, but the devascularized ischemic area resulting from liver parenchymal division can become a nidus for sepsis. We present a patient who underwent ALPPS modified to avoid ischemia and congestion after liver partitioning during stage 1. Case presentation ALPPS was carried out for a patient with multiple bilobar liver metastases from rectosigmoid colon cancer. The 2-stage treatment included 3 partial resections within the left lateral section and parenchymal division at the umbilical fissure with right portal vein ligation as stage 1, followed by right trisectionectomy as stage 2. During parenchymal division at the umbilical fissure, Segment 4 portal pedicles and the middle hepatic vein had to be resected at their roots. To safely accomplish this, combined resection of Segment 4 and the drainage area of the middle hepatic vein was performed after parenchymal partition, aiming to avoid ischemia and congestion within the remnant liver. Successful stage 2 hepatectomy followed later. No ischemia or congestion occurred during stage 1 or 2. Conclusions During ALPPS, ischemia and congestion after stage 1 must be avoided to reduce morbidity and mortality. The modification described here should reduce likelihood of severe postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
43
|
Coskun N, Yildirim A, Yuksel AO, Canyigit M, Ozdemir E. The Radiation Dose Absorbed by Healthy Parenchyma Is a Predictor for the Rate of Contralateral Hypertrophy After Unilobar Radioembolization of the Right Liver. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 56:291-298. [PMID: 36425272 PMCID: PMC9679057 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the predictors of contralateral hypertrophy in patients treated with unilobar transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres due to unresectable right-liver tumors. Methods Patients who underwent right unilobar TARE with resin microspheres between May 2019 and September 2021 were screened retrospectively. Contralateral hypertrophy was evaluated by calculating the kinetic growth rate (KGR) in 8-10 weeks after TARE. The predictors of increased KGR were determined with linear regression analysis. Results A total of 24 patients (16 with primary and 8 with metastatic liver tumors) were included in the study. After right unilobar TARE, mean volume of the left lobe increased from 368.26 to 436.16 mL, while the mean volume of the right lobe decreased from 1576.22 to 1477.89 mL. The median KGR of the left lobe was 0.28% per week. The radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly higher in patients with increased KGR (31.62 vs. 18.78 Gy, p = 0.037). Linear regression analysis showed that the dose absorbed by healthy parenchyma was significantly associated with increased KGR (b = 0.014, p = 0.043). Conclusion Patients who received right unilobar TARE for liver malignancies could develop a substantial contralateral hypertrophy, and the radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly associated with increased KGR in the left lobe. TARE could have a role for inducing contralateral hypertrophy as it offers the advantage of concurrent local tumor control along with its hypertrophic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Coskun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aslihan Yildirim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Canyigit
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Ozdemir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chen H, Wang X, Zhu W, Li Y, Yu Z, Li H, Yang Y, Zhu S, Chen X, Wang G. Application of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Surg 2022; 22:407. [PMID: 36434548 PMCID: PMC9700990 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01848-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in the treatment of initially unresectable hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to preliminarily explore the mechanism of rapid growth of the future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Twenty-four patients with HBV-associated HCC who underwent ALPPS in our hospital from August 2014 to January 2021 were retrospectively studied. Propensity score matching was used to compare oncologic outcomes of patients treated with ALPPS and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The expression of YAP and JNK in liver tissue after two stages of ALPPS were detected. RESULTS The median standard liver volume (SLV) was 1471.4 ml. Before second stage of ALPPS, the median FLR increased by 74.4%, and the median FLR/SLV increased from 26.1 to 41.6%. Twenty-two patients (91.7%) received staged hepatectomy after a median interval of 15 (9-24) d. The total incidence of postoperative complications in ALPPS group was 54.5%, and of Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb postoperative complications (requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention under general anesthesia) was 9.1%. There was no significant difference in total complications between ALPPS group and TACE group, but there were lower rate of above grade III complications in the TACE group than that in the ALPPS group. The incidence of complications was lower in laparoscopic-ALPPS than that in open surgery. In ALPPS group, the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year overall survival rate were respectively 71.4%, 33.3% and 4.8%. Interval time was an independent risk factor associated with overall survival rate. There was no significant difference in overall survival rate between ALPPS group and TACE group. For advanced HCC (BCLC stage B and C), ALPPS group was not superior to TACE group in overall survival rate. The expression of YAP and p-JNK in the residual liver tissue after second stage procedure was higher than that after first stage procedure, and the co-expression of YAP and p-JNK was observed in the residual liver tissue. CONCLUSION ALPPS is a safe and effective treatment for initially unresectable HBV-associated HCC. Laparoscopic technique might improve the effect of ALPPS. YAP and JNK pathway might take a role in rapid FLR increase in ALPPS procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoqi Chen
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China ,grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowen Wang
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China ,grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenfeng Zhu
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China ,grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Li
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Yu
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hua Li
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuguang Zhu
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Chen
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China ,grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Genshu Wang
- grid.412558.f0000 0004 1762 1794Department of Hepatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bell R, Begum S, Prasad R, Taura K, Dasari BVM. Volume and flow modulation strategies to mitigate post-hepatectomy liver failure. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021018. [PMID: 36465356 PMCID: PMC9714434 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post hepatectomy liver failure is the most common cause of death following major hepatic resections with a perioperative mortality rate between 40% to 60%. Various strategies have been devised to increase the volume and function of future liver remnant (FLR). This study aims to review the strategies used for volume and flow modulation to reduce the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure. METHOD An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 2000 to 2022 using the following search strategy "Post hepatectomy liver failure", "flow modulation", "small for size flow syndrome", "portal vein embolization", "dual vein embolization", "ALPPS" and "staged hepatectomy" to identify all articles published relating to this topic. RESULTS Volume and flow modulation strategies have evolved over time to maximize the volume and function of FLR to mitigate the risk of PHLF. Portal vein with or without hepatic vein embolization/ligation, ALPPS, and staged hepatectomy have resulted in significant hypertrophy and kinetic growth of FLR. Similarly, techniques including portal flow diversion, splenic artery ligation, splenectomy and pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin are employed to reduce the risk of small for size flow syndrome SFSF syndrome by decreasing portal venous flow and increasing hepatic artery flow at the same time. CONCLUSION The current review outlines the various strategies of volume and flow modulation that can be used in isolation or combination in the management of patients at risk of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Saleema Begum
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raj Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Physical prehabilitation improves the postoperative outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in experimental model. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19441. [PMID: 36376345 PMCID: PMC9663729 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23744-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aiming to improve the postoperative outcome of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), the effect of physical prehabilitation (PP) was investigated in experimental model. Male Wistar rats (n = 106) divided to PP and sedentary (S) groups underwent ALPPS. Changes in liver weight, Ki67 index and liver volume by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated. Liver function was assessed by laboratory parameters and 99mTc-mebrofenin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS). Utilizing endotoxemia model mortality and septic parameters were investigated. Liver mass (p < 0.001), Ki67 index (p < 0.001) and MRI liver volume (p < 0.05) increased in the PP group compared to the S group. Both standard laboratory parameters (p < 0.001) and HBS (p < 0.05) showed enhanced liver function in the PP group compared to the S group. The vulnerability of animals improved in the PP group, as mortality decreased (p < 0.001), while septic laboratory parameters improved (p < 0.05) compared to the S group in the endotoxemia model. Our study demonstrated for the first time the beneficial role of PP on not only volumetric but also functional liver regeneration and postoperative vulnerability after ALLPS.
Collapse
|
47
|
Bell RJ, Hakeem AR, Pandanaboyana S, Davidson BR, Prasad RK, Dasari BVM. Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:zrac131. [PMID: 36398754 PMCID: PMC9673134 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to compare progression to surgery, extent of liver hypertrophy, and postoperative outcomes in patients planned for major hepatectomy following either portal vein embolization (PVE) or dual vein embolization (DVE) for management of an inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches. Articles comparing PVE with DVE up to January 2022 were included. Articles comparing sequential DVE were excluded. ORs, risk ratios, and mean difference (MD) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models for meta-analysis. RESULTS Eight retrospective studies including 523 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics between the groups, specifically, age, sex, BMI, indication for resection, and baseline FLR (ml and per cent) were comparable. The percentage increase in hypertrophy was larger in the DVE group, 66 per cent in the DVE group versus 27 per cent in the PVE group, MD 39.07 (9.09, 69.05) (P = 0.010). Significantly fewer patients failed to progress to surgery in the DVE group than the PVE group, 13 per cent versus 25 per cent respectively OR 0.53 (0.31, 0.90) (P = 0.020). Rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure 13 per cent versus 22 per cent (P = 0.130) and major complications 20 per cent versus 28 per cent (Clavien-Dindo more than IIIa) (P = 0.280) were lower. Perioperative mortality was lower with DVE, 1 per cent versus 10 per cent (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION DVE seems to produce a greater degree of hypertrophy of the FLR than PVE alone which translates into more patients progressing to surgery. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Abdul R Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Raj K Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Maruyama M, Yoshizako T, Yoshida R, Nakamura M, Tajima Y, Kitagaki H. Increased future liver function after modified associating liver partition and portal vein ligation/embolization for staged hepatectomy. Acta Radiol Open 2022; 11:20584601221134951. [PMID: 36275886 PMCID: PMC9583209 DOI: 10.1177/20584601221134951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing ratio of functional future liver remnant (functional %FLR) after modified associating liver partition and portal vein ligation/embolization for staged hepatectomy (modified-ALPPS) compared with portal vein embolization (PVE) has not been comprehensively evaluated. Purpose To compare the increasing ratio of functional %FLR between modified-ALPPS and PVE via technetium-99 m-galactosyl human serum albumin single-photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-GSA SPECT/CT) fusion imaging. Material and Methods Seven and six patients underwent modified-ALPPS (modified-ALPPS group) and PVE (PVE group) from 2015 to 2019. The functional %FLR on 99 mTc-GSA SPECT/CT fusion imaging was assessed before and 1 week (modified-ALPPS group) and 3 weeks (PVE group) after each procedure. The increasing ratio of functional %FLR (functional %FLR ratio) was calculated and compared between the two groups. Moreover, the hypertrophy ratio of future liver remnant volume (FLRV ratio) and atrophy ratio of embolized liver volume (.ELV ratio) were evaluated. Results The mean functional %FLR ratios of the modified-ALPPS group (1.47 ± 0.15) and the PVE group (1.49 ± 0.20) were comparable (p > .05). The median FLRV ratio of modified-ALPPS group (1.48) was higher than that of the PVE group (1.16), the median ELV ratio of the PVE group (0.81) was lower than that of the modified-ALPPS group (0.94), and the results significantly differed between the two groups (p < .05). Conclusion The increasing ratio of functional %FLR was comparable between modified-ALPPS and PVE. Compared with PVE, ALPPS was associated with a higher hypertrophy rate of the remnant liver but a lower atrophy rate of the embolized liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsunari Maruyama
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan,Mitsunari Maruyama, MD, PhD, Department of
Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya cho, Izumo
00693-8501, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yoshizako
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Rika Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Megumi Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Tajima
- Department of
Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Hajime Kitagaki
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of
Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, et alKorenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Al Farai A, Guiu B, Troisi RI, Panaro F. Future remnant liver optimization: preoperative assessment, volume augmentation procedures and management of PVE failure. Minerva Surg 2022; 77:368-379. [PMID: 35332767 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09541-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Surgery is the cornerstone treatment for patients with primary or metastatic hepatic tumors. Thanks to surgical and anesthetic technological advances, current indications for liver resections have been significantly expanded to include any patient in whom all disease can be resected with a negative margin (R0) while preserving an adequate future residual liver (FRL). Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is still a feared complication following major liver surgery, associated with high morbidity, mortality and cost implications. PHLF is mainly linked to both the size and quality of the FRL. Significant advances have been made in detailed preoperative assessment to predict and mitigate this complication, even if an ideal methodology has yet to be defined. Several procedures have been described to induce hypertrophy of the FRL when needed. Each technique has its advantages and limitations, and among them portal vein embolization (PVE) is still considered the standard of care. About 20% of patients after PVE fail to undergo the scheduled hepatectomy, and newer secondary procedures, such as segment 4 embolization, ALPPS and HVE, have been proposed as salvage strategies. The aim of this review was to discuss the current modalities available and new perspectives in the optimization of FRL in patients undergoing major liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Abdallah Al Farai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat, Oman
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Unit of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Montpellier University Hospital School of Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier-Nimes University, Montpellier, France -
| |
Collapse
|