1
|
Korenblik R, van Zon JFJA, Olij B, Heil J, Dewulf MJL, Neumann UP, Olde Damink SWM, Binkert CA, Schadde E, van der Leij C, van Dam RM, van Baardewijk LJ, Barbier L, Binkert CA, Billingsley K, Björnsson B, Andorrà EC, Arslan B, Baclija I, Bemelmans MHA, Bent C, de Boer MT, Bokkers RPH, de Boo DW, Breen D, Breitenstein S, Bruners P, Cappelli A, Carling U, Robert MCI, Chan B, De Cobelli F, Choi J, Crawford M, Croagh D, van Dam RM, Deprez F, Detry O, Dewulf MJL, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Font JC, Davis R, Delle M, Fernando R, Fisher O, Fouraschen SMG, Fretland ÅA, Fundora Y, Gelabert A, Gerard L, Gobardhan P, Gómez F, Guiliante F, Grünberger T, Grochola LF, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess G, Hilal MA, Hoffmann M, Iezzi R, Imani F, Inmutto N, James S, Borobia FJG, Jovine E, Kalil J, Kingham P, Kollmar O, Kleeff J, van der Leij C, Lopez-Ben S, Macdonald A, Meijerink M, Korenblik R, Lapisatepun W, Leclercq WKG, Lindsay R, Lucidi V, Madoff DC, Martel G, Mehrzad H, Menon K, Metrakos P, Modi S, Moelker A, Montanari N, Moragues JS, Navinés-López J, Neumann UP, Nguyen J, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Olde Damink SWM, Qu X, Raptis DA, Ratti F, Ryan S, Ridouani F, Rinkes IHMB, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Serenari M, Salik A, Sallemi C, Sandström P, Martin ES, Sarría L, Schadde E, Serrablo A, Settmacher U, Smits J, Smits MLJ, Snitzbauer A, Soonawalla Z, Sparrelid E, Spuentrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe R, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Teichgräber U, Udupa V, Valenti DA, Vass D, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White S, De Wispelaere JF, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IJAJ. Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6844022. [PMID: 36437731 PMCID: PMC9702575 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with bi-lobar liver tumours are not eligible for liver resection due to an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). To reduce the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure and the primary cause of death, regenerative procedures intent to increase the FLR before surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the available literature and outcomes on the effectiveness of simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) versus portal vein embolization (PVE) alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to September 2022. The primary outcome was resectability and the secondary outcome was the FLR volume increase. RESULTS Eight studies comparing PVE/HVE with PVE and six retrospective PVE/HVE case series were included. Pooled resectability within the comparative studies was 75 per cent in the PVE group (n = 252) versus 87 per cent in the PVE/HVE group (n = 166, OR 1.92 (95% c.i., 1.13-3.25)) favouring PVE/HVE (P = 0.015). After PVE, FLR hypertrophy between 12 per cent and 48 per cent (after a median of 21-30 days) was observed, whereas growth between 36 per cent and 67 per cent was reported after PVE/HVE (after a median of 17-31 days). In the comparative studies, 90-day primary cause of death was similar between groups (2.5 per cent after PVE versus 2.2 per cent after PVE/HVE), but a higher 90-day primary cause of death was reported in single-arm PVE/HVE cohort studies (6.9 per cent, 12 of 175 patients). CONCLUSION Based on moderate/weak evidence, PVE/HVE seems to increase resectability of bi-lobar liver tumours with a comparable safety profile. Additionally, PVE/HVE resulted in faster and more pronounced hypertrophy compared with PVE alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remon Korenblik
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Jasper F J A van Zon
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,GROW—Department of Surgery, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Maxime J L Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany,NUTRIM—Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hirslanden Klink St. Anna Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Korenblik R, Olij B, Aldrighetti LA, Hilal MA, Ahle M, Arslan B, van Baardewijk LJ, Baclija I, Bent C, Bertrand CL, Björnsson B, de Boer MT, de Boer SW, Bokkers RPH, Rinkes IHMB, Breitenstein S, Bruijnen RCG, Bruners P, Büchler MW, Camacho JC, Cappelli A, Carling U, Chan BKY, Chang DH, Choi J, Font JC, Crawford M, Croagh D, Cugat E, Davis R, De Boo DW, De Cobelli F, De Wispelaere JF, van Delden OM, Delle M, Detry O, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Fisher O, Fondevila C, Fretland Å, Borobia FG, Gelabert A, Gérard L, Giuliante F, Gobardhan PD, Gómez F, Grünberger T, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess GF, Hoffmann MH, Iezzi R, Imani F, Nguyen J, Jovine E, Kalff JC, Kazemier G, Kingham TP, Kleeff J, Kollmar O, Leclercq WKG, Ben SL, Lucidi V, MacDonald A, Madoff DC, Manekeller S, Martel G, Mehrabi A, Mehrzad H, Meijerink MR, Menon K, Metrakos P, Meyer C, Moelker A, Modi S, Montanari N, Navines J, Neumann UP, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Qu X, Raptis D, Ratti F, Ridouani F, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Ryan S, Sallemi C, Moragues JS, Sandström P, Sarriá L, Schnitzbauer A, Serenari M, Serrablo A, Smits MLJ, Sparrelid E, Spüntrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe RP, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Udupa V, Valenti D, Fundora Y, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White SA, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IAJ, Binkert CA, Bemelmans MHA, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1391-1398. [PMID: 35790566 PMCID: PMC9458562 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03176-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS Not applicable. CONCLUSION DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - B Olij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Ahle
- Deparment of Radiology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Arslan
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - L J van Baardewijk
- Department of Radiology, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I Baclija
- Department of Radiology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bent
- Department of Radiology, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth and Christuchurch, UK
| | - C L Bertrand
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M T de Boer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S W de Boer
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R P H Bokkers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - R C G Bruijnen
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Bruners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - A Cappelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - U Carling
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B K Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D H Chang
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Choi
- Department of Surgery, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - J Codina Font
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - M Crawford
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - D Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - E Cugat
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - R Davis
- Department of Radiology, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - D W De Boo
- Department of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| | - F De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - O M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Detry
- Department of Surgery, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - R Díaz-Nieto
- Department of Surgery, Aintree University Hospitals NHS, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Dili
- Department of Surgery, CHU UCLouvain Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - C Fondevila
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Å Fretland
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - F Garcia Borobia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
| | - A Gelabert
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Sabadell, Spain
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - L Gérard
- Department of Radiology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - F Giuliante
- Department of Surgery, Gemelli University Hospital Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - F Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Grünberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center Vienna Health Network, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Guitart
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Heil
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Herrero
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mútua Terassa, Terassa, Spain
| | - G F Hess
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M H Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, St. Clara Spital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - R Iezzi
- Department of Radiology, Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Imani
- Department of Radiology, Amphia, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - J Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Western Health Footscray, Footscray, Australia
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J C Kalff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T P Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - O Kollmar
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Maxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - S Lopez Ben
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - V Lucidi
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A MacDonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - S Manekeller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - A Mehrabi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Mehrzad
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - C Meyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - A Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Modi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - N Montanari
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Navines
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Peddu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - J N Primrose
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK
| | - X Qu
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - D Raptis
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - F Ratti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - F Ridouani
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Rogan
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - U Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - S Ryan
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - C Sallemi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J Sampere Moragues
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Sarriá
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Serenari
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M L J Smits
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Spüntrup
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - G A Stavrou
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - R P Sutcliffe
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Tancredi
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - V Udupa
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS, Oxford, UK
| | - D Valenti
- Department of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Y Fundora
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hosptital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - X Wang
- Department of Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China
| | - S A White
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - W A Wohlgemuth
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
| | - D Yu
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital NHS, London, UK
| | - I A J Zijlstra
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C van der Leij
- Deparment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Schadde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - R M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht Universiteitssingel 40 room 5.452, 6229 ET, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wennerblom J, Ateeb Z, Jönsson C, Björnsson B, Tingstedt B, Williamsson C, Sandström P, Ansorge C, Blomberg J, Del Chiaro M. Reinforced versus standard stapler transection on postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy: multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:265-270. [PMID: 33793753 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the leading cause of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy. Strategies investigated to reduce the incidence have been disappointing. Recent data showed a reduction in postoperative pancreatic fistula with the use of synthetic mesh reinforcement of the staple line. METHODS An RCT was conducted between May 2014 and February 2016 at four tertiary referral centres in Sweden. Patients scheduled for distal pancreatectomy were eligible. Enrolled patients were randomized during surgery to stapler transection with biological reinforcement or standard stapler transection. Patients were blinded to the allocation. The primary endpoint was the development of any postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints included morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS Some 107 patients were randomized and 106 included in an intention-to-treat analysis (56 in reinforced stapling group, 50 in standard stapling group). No difference was demonstrated in terms of clinically relevant fistulas (grade B and C): 6 of 56 (11 per cent) with reinforced stapling versus 8 of 50 (16 per cent) with standard stapling (P = 0.332). There was no difference between groups in overall postoperative complications: 45 (80 per cent) and 39 (78 per cent) in reinforced and standard stapling groups respectively (P = 0.765). Duration of hospital stay was comparable: median 8 (range 2-35) and 9 (2-114) days respectively (P = 0.541). CONCLUSION Biodegradable stapler reinforcement at the transection line of the pancreas did not reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula compared with regular stapler transection in distal pancreatectomy. Registration number: NCT02149446 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Wennerblom
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Z Ateeb
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTECH), Karolinska Institutet at Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Jönsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital at Lund and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - C Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital at Lund and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - C Ansorge
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTECH), Karolinska Institutet at Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Blomberg
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTECH), Karolinska Institutet at Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTECH), Karolinska Institutet at Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado at Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Engstrand J, Abreu de Carvalho LF, Aghayan D, Balakrishnan A, Belli A, Björnsson B, Dasari BVM, Detry O, Di Martino M, Edwin B, Erdmann J, Fristedt R, Fusai G, Gimenez-Maurel T, Hemmingsson O, Hidalgo Salinas C, Isaksson B, Ivanecz A, Izzo F, Knoefel WT, Kron P, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Lesurtel M, Lodge JPA, Machairas N, Marino MV, Martin V, Paterson A, Rystedt J, Sandström P, Serrablo A, Siriwardena AK, Taflin H, van Gulik TM, Yaqub S, Özden I, Ramia JM, Sturesson C. Liver resection and ablation for squamous cell carcinoma liver metastases. BJS Open 2021; 5:6356812. [PMID: 34426830 PMCID: PMC8382975 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limited evidence exists to guide the management of patients with liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to describe patterns of disease recurrence after liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases and factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Method Members of the European–African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association were invited to include all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases between 2002 and 2019. Patient, tumour and perioperative characteristics were analysed with regard to RFS and OS. Results Among the 102 patients included from 24 European centres, 56 patients had anal cancer, and 46 patients had SCC from other origin. RFS in patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer was 16 and 9 months, respectively (P = 0.134). A positive resection margin significantly influenced RFS for both anal cancer and non-anal cancer liver metastases (hazard ratio 6.82, 95 per cent c.i. 2.40 to 19.35, for the entire cohort). Median survival duration and 5-year OS rate among patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer were 50 months and 45 per cent and 21 months and 25 per cent, respectively. For the entire cohort, only non-radical resection was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.21, 95 per cent c.i. 1.24 to 8.30). Conclusion Liver resection/ablation of liver metastases from SCC can result in long-term survival. Survival was superior in treated patients with liver metastases from anal versus non-anal cancer. A negative resection margin is paramount for acceptable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Engstrand
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L F Abreu de Carvalho
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - A Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, HPB Surgical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - O Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - B Edwin
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Fristedt
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - G Fusai
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Gimenez-Maurel
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - O Hemmingsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - C Hidalgo Salinas
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - B Isaksson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - F Izzo
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, HPB Surgical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - W T Knoefel
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P Kron
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - N Lehwald-Tywuschik
- Department of Surgery (A), Heinrich-Heine-University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Lesurtel
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - J P A Lodge
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - N Machairas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo (PA), Abano, Italy.,General Surgery Department, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano, Italy
| | - V Martin
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - A Paterson
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Rystedt
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A K Siriwardena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - H Taflin
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - T M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Yaqub
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - I Özden
- Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - J M Ramia
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante. ISABIAL Alicante, Spain
| | - C Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heil J, Korenblik R, Heid F, Bechstein WO, Bemelmans M, Binkert C, Björnsson B, Breitenstein S, Detry O, Dili A, Dondelinger RF, Gerard L, Giménez-Maurel T, Guiu B, Heise D, Hertl M, Kalil JA, Klein JJ, Lakoma A, Neumann UP, Olij B, Pappas SG, Sandström P, Schnitzbauer A, Serrablo A, Tasse J, Van der Leij C, Metrakos P, Van Dam R, Schadde E. Preoperative portal vein or portal and hepatic vein embolization: DRAGON collaborative group analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:834-842. [PMID: 33661306 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent of liver resection for tumours is limited by the expected functional reserve of the future liver remnant (FRL), so hypertrophy may be induced by portal vein embolization (PVE), taking 6 weeks or longer for growth. This study assessed the hypothesis that simultaneous embolization of portal and hepatic veins (PVE/HVE) accelerates hypertrophy and improves resectability. METHODS All centres of the international DRAGON trials study collaborative were asked to provide data on patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE on 2016-2019 (more than 5 PVE/HVE procedures was a requirement). Liver volumetry was performed using OsiriX MD software. Multivariable analysis was performed for the endpoints of resectability rate, FLR hypertrophy and major complications using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics, regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS In total, 39 patients had undergone PVE/HVE and 160 had PVE alone. The PVE/HVE group had better hypertrophy than the PVE group (59 versus 48 per cent respectively; P = 0.020) and resectability (90 versus 68 per cent; P = 0.007). Major complications (26 versus 34 per cent; P = 0.550) and 90-day mortality (3 versus 16 per cent respectively, P = 0.065) were comparable. Multivariable analysis confirmed that these effects were independent of confounders. CONCLUSION PVE/HVE achieved better FLR hypertrophy and resectability than PVE in this collaborative experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - R Korenblik
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - F Heid
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - W O Bechstein
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - S Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - O Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, University of Liege, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - A Dili
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dinant Godinne Saint-Elisabeth - UCL-Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - R F Dondelinger
- Department of Imaging, University Hospital Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - L Gerard
- Department of Imaging, University Hospital Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - T Giménez-Maurel
- Department of Surgery, Miguel University Hospital and University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - B Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - D Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M Hertl
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - J A Kalil
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - J J Klein
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - A Lakoma
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - U P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - B Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S G Pappas
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel University Hospital and University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA
| | - C Van der Leij
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - P Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - R Van Dam
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Balduzzi A, van Hilst J, Korrel M, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, van den Boezem P, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, van Dam R, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Ercolani G, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Forgione A, Gayet B, Gomez D, Koerkamp BG, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Krautz C, Marudanayagam R, Menon K, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Cunha AS, Salvia R, Sánchez-Cabús S, Soonawalla Z, Hilal MA, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic versus open extended radical left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international propensity-score matched study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6949-6959. [PMID: 33398565 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08206-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A radical left pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may require extended, multivisceral resections. The role of a laparoscopic approach in extended radical left pancreatectomy (ERLP) is unclear since comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after laparoscopic vs open ERLP in patients with PDAC. METHODS An international multicenter propensity-score matched study including patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open ERLP (L-ERLP; O-ERLP) for PDAC was performed (2007-2015). The ISGPS definition for extended resection was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival, margin negative rate (R0), and lymph node retrieval. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2015, 320 patients underwent ERLP in 34 centers from 12 countries (65 L-ERLP vs. 255 O-ERLP). After propensity-score matching, 44 L-ERLP could be matched to 44 O-ERLP. In the matched cohort, the conversion rate in L-ERLP group was 35%. The L-ERLP R0 resection rate (matched cohort) was comparable to O-ERLP (67% vs 48%; P = 0.063) but the lymph node yield was lower for L-ERLP than O-ERLP (median 11 vs 19, P = 0.023). L-ERLP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying (0% vs 16%, P = 0.006) and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs 13 days, P = 0.005), as compared to O-ERLP. Outcomes were comparable for additional organ resections, vascular resections (besides splenic vessels), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications, or 90-day mortality (2% vs 2%, P = 0.973). The median overall survival was comparable between both groups (19 vs 20 months, P = 0.571). Conversion did not worsen outcomes in L-ERLP. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach may be used safely in selected patients requiring ERLP for PDAC, since morbidity, mortality, and overall survival seem comparable, as compared to O-ERLP. L-ERLP is associated with a high conversion rate and reduced lymph node yield but also with less delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to O-ERLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
| | - J van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Lof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - A Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - U Boggi
- Department of Surgery, Universitá di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Butturini
- Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy
| | - R Casadei
- Department of Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - R van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Dokmak
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - M A Sahakyan
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - G Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna Forlì, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J M Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Hopital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - M Falconi
- San Raffaele Hospital Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Forgione
- Department of Surgery, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Gomez
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - T Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - I Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - C Krautz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Marudanayagam
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - I Poves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Sa Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - R Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - S Sánchez-Cabús
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Z Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. .,HPB and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Björnsson B, Lindhoff Larsson A, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Author response to: Comment on: The LAPOP trial of laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e356. [PMID: 32652535 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping
| | - A Lindhoff Larsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping
| | - C Hjalmarsson
- Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - T Gasslander
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Björnsson B, Lindhoff Larsson A, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Author response to: Comment on: Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e279. [PMID: 32445396 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Lindhoff Larsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - C Hjalmarsson
- Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - T Gasslander
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1281-1288. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studies have suggested that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is advantageous compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) regarding hospital stay, blood loss and recovery. Only one randomized study is available, which showed enhanced functional recovery after LDP compared with ODP.
Methods
Consecutive patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary tumour board and planned for standard distal pancreatectomy were randomized prospectively to LDP or ODP in an unblinded, parallel-group, single-centre superiority trial. The primary outcome was postoperative hospital stay.
Results
Of 105 screened patients, 60 were randomized and 58 (24 women, 41 per cent) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis; there were 29 patients of mean age 68 years in the LDP group and 29 of mean age 63 years in the ODP group. The main indication was cystic pancreatic lesions, followed by neuroendocrine tumours. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 (i.q.r. 4–5) days in the laparoscopic group versus 6 (5–7) days in the open group (P = 0·002). Functional recovery was attained after a median of 4 (i.q.r. 2–6) versus 6 (4–7) days respectively (P = 0·007), and duration of surgery was 120 min in both groups (P = 0·482). Blood loss was less with laparoscopic surgery: median 50 (i.q.r. 25–150) ml versus 100 (100–300) ml in the open group (P = 0·018). No difference was found in the complication rates (Clavien–Dindo grade III or above: 4 versus 8 patients respectively). The rate of delayed gastric emptying and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion
LDP is associated with shorter hospital stay than ODP, with shorter time to functional recovery and less bleeding. Registration number: ISRCTN26912858 (www.isrctn.com).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Lindhoff Larsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - C Hjalmarsson
- Department of Surgery, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - T Gasslander
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henriksson M, Björnsson B, Sternby Eilard M, Lindell G, Strömberg C, Hemmingsson O, Isaksson B, Rizell M, Sandström P. Treatment patterns and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the Swedish national registry SweLiv. BJS Open 2019; 4:109-117. [PMID: 32011814 PMCID: PMC6996573 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consistent data on clinical features, treatment modalities and long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using nationwide quality registers are lacking. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with HCC using a national maintained database. METHODS Characteristics and treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with HCC and registered in the national register of liver and bile duct tumours (SweLiv) between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log rank test to compare subgroups for clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes according to the year of treatment. RESULTS A total of 3376 patients with HCC were registered over 8 years, 246 (7·3 per cent) of whom underwent transplantation. Some 501 (14·8 per cent) and 390 patients (11·6 per cent) had resection and ablation as primary treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization and systemic sorafenib treatment were intended in 476 (14·1 per cent) and 426 patients (12·6 per cent) respectively; the remaining 1337 (39·6 per cent) were registered but referred for best supportive care (BSC). The 5-year survival rate was approximately 75 per cent in the transplantation group. Median OS was 4·6 (i.q.r. 2·0 to not reached) years after resection and 3·1 (2·3-6·7) years following ablation. In patients referred for palliative treatment, median survival was 1·4 (0·8-2·9), 0·5 (0·3-1·2) and 0·3 (0·1-1·0) years for the TACE, sorafenib and BSC groups respectively (P < 0·001). Median survival was 0·9 years for the total HCC cohort in 2009-2012, before publication of the Swedish national treatment programme, increasing to 1·4 years in 2013-2016 (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION The survival outcomes reported were in line with previous results from smaller cohorts. The introduction of national guidelines may have contributed to improved survival among patients with HCC in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Henriksson
- Centre for Medical Technology Assessment, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M Sternby Eilard
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - G Lindell
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - C Strömberg
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Hemmingsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - B Isaksson
- Department of Surgery, Akademiska Hospital, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - M Rizell
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Røsok BI, Høst-Brunsell T, Brudvik KW, Carling U, Dorenberg E, Björnsson B, Lothe RA, Bjørnbeth BA, Sandström P. Characterization of early recurrences following liver resection by ALPPS and two stage hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver-metastases and small future liver remnants; a translational substudy of the LIGRO-RCT. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1017-1023. [PMID: 30765198 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associated liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is an alternative resection method to portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with small future liver remnants (FLR) but has been associated with early tumor recurrences. METHODS Twenty-four patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients from the randomized multicenter LIGRO trial comparing outcome of ALPPS (n = 13) vs PVE (n = 11) were included in the study. Mutational analyses of the KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIC3CA and TP53 genes of the metastases were performed in 21 patients and correlated to early tumor recurrence. RESULTS Within 12 months, 13 patients experienced recurrences (6 in TSH group and 7 in ALPPS group). Nine of 13 patients with recurrences had mutations in the TP53 gene, while 3 of 8 patients without recurrence carried the same mutation. Only sporadic cases of the other mutations studied were identified. CONCLUSIONS ALPPS did not appear to be associated with higher rate of rapid recurrences than PVE following radical resection of colorectal liver metastases. Mutations in genes associated with negative oncologic outcome after surgical resection most likely play a role for tumor recurrences in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B I Røsok
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, HPB Surgery Unit, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - T Høst-Brunsell
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - K W Brudvik
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, HPB Surgery Unit, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - U Carling
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Dorenberg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - R A Lothe
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - B A Bjørnbeth
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, HPB Surgery Unit, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hasselgren K, Halldestam I, Fraser MP, Benjaminsson Nyberg P, Gasslander T, Björnsson B. Does the Introduction of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Jeopardize Patient Safety and Well-Being? Scand J Surg 2016; 105:223-227. [DOI: 10.1177/1457496915626838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Despite retrospective data indicating short-term superiority for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared to open distal pancreatectomy, the implementation of the procedure has been slow. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients operated with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy during the early phase of introduction are at higher risk for complications than patients operated with open distal pancreatectomy. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of patients operated with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (n = 37) from the introduction of the procedure and comparison regarding demographic data, preoperative data, operative factors, and postoperative outcomes to patients operated with open distal pancreatectomy was done. Results: Operation duration shortened (195 vs 143 min, p = 0.04) and severe complications reduced (37% vs 6%, p = 0.02) significantly in the laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy group between the first half of the study and the second half. Blood loss was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy group (75 mL) than in the open distal pancreatectomy group (550 mL), while complication rate and hospital stay as well as the percentage of radical resections were the same. Conclusion: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be introduced without jeopardizing patient safety and well-being during the early learning curve. The procedures should be compared in a prospective randomized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Hasselgren
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - I. Halldestam
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M. P. Fraser
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P. Benjaminsson Nyberg
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - T. Gasslander
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B. Björnsson
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Björnsson B, Sparrelid E, Hasselgren K, Gasslander T, Isaksson B, Sandström P. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Primary Hepatobiliary Malignancies and Non-Colorectal Liver Metastases. Scand J Surg 2016; 105:158-62. [DOI: 10.1177/1457496915613650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aims: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy may increase the possibility of radical resection in the case of liver malignancy. Concerns have been raised about the high morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure, particularly when applied for diagnoses other than colorectal liver metastases. The aim of this study was to analyze the initial experience with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in cases of non-colorectal liver metastases and primary hepatobiliary malignancies in Scandinavia. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy procedures performed at two Swedish university hospitals for non-colorectal liver metastases and primary hepatobiliary malignancies was performed. The primary focus was on the safety of the procedure. Results and Conclusion: Ten patients were included: four had hepatocellular cancer, three had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, one had a Klatskin tumor, one had ocular melanoma metastasis, and one had a metastasis from a Wilms’ tumor. All patients completed both operations, and the highest grade of complication (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) was 3A, which was observed in one patient. No 90-day mortality was observed. Radical resection (R0) was achieved in nine patients, while the resection was R2 in one patient. The low morbidity and mortality observed in this cohort compared with those of earlier reports on associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for diagnoses other than colorectal liver metastases may be related to the selection of patients with limited comorbidity. In addition, procedures other than associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy had been avoided in most of the patients. In conclusion, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can be applied to primary hepatobiliary malignancies and non-colorectal liver metastases with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - E. Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K. Hasselgren
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - T. Gasslander
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B. Isaksson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P. Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hasselgren K, Sandström P, Gasslander T, Björnsson B. Multivisceral Resection in Patients with Advanced Abdominal Tumors. Scand J Surg 2016; 105:147-52. [PMID: 26929293 DOI: 10.1177/1457496915622128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Multivisceral resection for advanced tumors can result in prolonged survival but may also increase the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether extensive resections increase the severity of postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted between 2009 and 2014 at the Linköping University Hospital surgical department. All patients with a confirmed or presumed malignant disease who underwent a non-standardized surgical procedure requiring a multivisceral resection were included. The primary endpoint was 90-day complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were included, with an age range of 17-77 years. A median of three organs was resected. The most common diagnoses were neuroendocrine tumor (n = 8), gastric cancer (n = 7), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 6). One patient died during surgery. Complications ⩾ grade 3b according to Clavien-Dindo score occurred in 10 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 32 patients. No correlation was observed between the number of anastomoses, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and complications. Only postoperative blood transfusion was correlated with severe complications (p = 0.046); however, a tendency toward more complications with an increasing number of resected organs was observed (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION Multivisceral resection can result in R0, potentially curing patients with advanced tumors. Here, no correlation between extensive resections and complications was observed. Only postoperative blood transfusion was correlated with severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Hasselgren
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - T Gasslander
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Björnsson B, Sparrelid E, Røsok B, Pomianowska E, Hasselgren K, Gasslander T, Bjørnbeth BA, Isaksson B, Sandström P. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases--Intermediate oncological results. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:531-7. [PMID: 26830731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Revised: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) not amenable for resection have grave prognosis. One limiting factor for surgery is a small future liver remnant (FLR). Early data suggests that associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) effectively increases the volume of the FLR allowing for resection in a larger fraction of patients than conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein occlusion (PVO). Oncological results of the treatment are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate oncological outcomes after ALPPS in patients with CRLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patients with CRLM operated with ALPPS at the participating centres between December 2012 and May 2014. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female), age 67 years (28-80) were operated for 6.5 (1-38) metastases of which the largest was 40 mm (14-130). Six (27.3%) patients had extra-hepatic metastases, 16 (72.7%) synchronous presentation. All patients received chemotherapy, 6 cycles (3-25) preoperatively and 16 (70%) postoperatively. Ten patients (43%) were rescue ALPPS after failed PVO. Severe complications occurred in 13.6% and one (4.5%) patient died within 90 days of surgery. After a median follow-up of 22.5 months from surgery and 33.5 months from diagnosis of liver metastases estimated 2 year overall survival was 59% (from surgery) and 73% (from diagnosis). Liver only recurrences (n = 8), were treated with reresection/ablation (n = 7) while lung recurrences were treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION The overall survival, rate of severe complications and perioperative mortality associated with ALPPS for patients with CRLM is comparable to TSH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Røsok
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Pomianowska
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Hasselgren
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - T Gasslander
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - B A Bjørnbeth
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Isaksson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
D'Haese JG, Neumann J, Weniger M, Pratschke S, Björnsson B, Ardiles V, Chapman W, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Soubrane O, Robles-Campos R, Stojanovic M, Dalla Valle R, Chan ACY, Coenen M, Guba M, Werner J, Schadde E, Angele MK. Should ALPPS be Used for Liver Resection in Intermediate-Stage HCC? Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:1335-43. [PMID: 26646946 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5007-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended liver resections in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are problematic due to hepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been promoted as a novel method to induce hypertrophy for patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases, but outcomes in HCC have not been well investigated. METHODS All patients registered in the international ALPPS Registry ( www.alpps.org ) from 2010 to 2015 were studied. Hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, perioperative morbidity and mortality, age, overall survival, and other parameters were compared between patients with HCC and patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). RESULTS The study compared 35 patients with HCC and 225 patients with CRLM. The majority of patients undergoing ALPPS for HCC fall into the intermediate-stage category of the Barcelona clinic algorithm. In this study, hypertrophy was rapid and extensive for the HCC patients, albeit lower than for the CRLM patients (47 vs. 76 %; p < 0.002). Hypertrophy showed a linear negative correlation with the degrees of fibrosis. The 90-day mortality for ALPPS used to treat HCC was almost fivefold higher than for CRLM (31 vs. 7 %; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that patients older than 61 years had a significantly reduced overall survival (p < 0.004). CONCLUSION The ALPPS approach induces a considerable hypertrophic response in HCC patients and allows resection of intermediate-stage HCC, albeit at the cost of a 31 % perioperative mortality rate. The use of ALPPS for HCC remains prohibitive for most patients and should be performed only for a highly selected patient population younger than 60 years with low-grade fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G D'Haese
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Neumann
- Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - M Weniger
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Pratschke
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - V Ardiles
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Italian Hospital Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - W Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - O Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | | | - M Stojanovic
- Department of Surgery, University Clinical Center, Nis, Serbia
| | - R Dalla Valle
- Department of Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - A C Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | - M Coenen
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - M Guba
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - E Schadde
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Institute of Physiology, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M K Angele
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Björnsson B, Lundgren L. A Personal Computer Freeware as a Tool for Surgeons to Plan Liver Resections. Scand J Surg 2015; 105:153-7. [PMID: 26420775 DOI: 10.1177/1457496915607802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The increase in liver surgery and the proportion of resections done on the margin to postoperative liver failure make preoperative calculations regarding liver volume important. Earlier studies have shown good correlation between calculations done with ImageJ and specimen weight as well as volume calculations done with more robust systems. The correlation to actual volumes of resected liver tissue has not been investigated, and this was the aim of this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 30 patients undergoing well-defined liver resections were included in this study. Volumes calculated with ImageJ were compared to volume measurements done after the retrieval of resected liver tissue. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS A strong correlation between calculated and measured liver volume was found with sample concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) = 0.9950. The knowledge on the nature of liver resections sets liver surgeons in a unique position to be able to accurately predict the volumes to be resected and, therefore, also the volume that will remain after surgery. This becomes increasingly important with the evolvement of methods to extend the boundaries of liver surgery. ImageJ is a reliable tool to preoperatively assess liver volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery and Department of Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Lundgren
- Department of Surgery and Department of Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Björnsson B, Reynisson P, Solmundsson J, Valdimarsson H. Seasonal changes in migratory and predatory activity of two species of gadoid preying on inshore northern shrimp Pandalus borealis. J Fish Biol 2011; 78:1110-1131. [PMID: 21463310 DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02923.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The interaction between two species of gadoid and a shrimp stock was studied in a 40 km long two-armed fjord in north-west Iceland. On the basis of acoustic and trawl surveys in 2005 and 2006, immature cod Gadus morhua and haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus were found to migrate to the inner part of the fjord in late summer, concurrent with rising temperatures. At the same time, the local northern shrimp Pandalus borealis stock retreated into the north-east arm of the fjord. Vertical distribution of acoustic targets indicated that a significant and temporally variable fraction of the gadoids was inaccessible to the trawl. Shrimp was a significant part of the diet of immature G. morhua, except in June 2006 when euphausiids comprised most of the diet of both G. morhua and M. aeglefinus. Shrimp was only a minor part of the diet of M. aeglefinus. An on-off relationship was observed in the catches of gadoids and shrimp. In hauls with large catches of gadoids, few shrimp were found and vice versa, indicating avoidance reaction at this spatial scale. The cooling in winter may have driven the gadoids to the outer parts of the fjord, which in turn may have aided in the dispersal of the shrimp stock in the following months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Björnsson
- Marine Research Institute, Skúlagata 4, P. O. Box 1390, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Magnadóttir B, Jónsdóttir H, Helgason S, Björnsson B, Solem ST, Pilström L. Immune parameters of immunised cod (Gadus morhua L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2001; 11:75-89. [PMID: 11271604 DOI: 10.1006/fsim.2000.0296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The immune response of cod (Gadus morhua L.) is unusual in that specific antibody response is limited or absent. In the present study cod was immunised with haptenated and non-haptenated protein antigen at two different temperatures and the antibody response monitored over a period of 18 months. Other humoral parameters of immunological importance were also analysed, namely total immunoglobulin concentration, anti-protease and spontaneous haemolytic activity. No specific antibody response was detected but increased activity of non-specific anti-TNP antibodies was observed 10-12 weeks after immunisation, irrespective of the antigen used. This antibody activity was attributed to the adjuvant used (FCA) and did not cross react with other antigens tested. Other parameters were probably not influenced by the immunisation but seasonal fluctuations were indicated. The immunoglobulin level appeared to peak in August-September and the anti-protease activity and the haemolytic activity in October-January.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Magnadóttir
- Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Magnadóttir B, Jónsdóttir H, Helgason S, Björnsson B, Jørgensen TO, Pilström L. Humoral immune parameters in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) I. The effects of environmental temperature. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 1999; 122:173-80. [PMID: 10327607 DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0491(98)10156-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The effects of environmental temperature on certain humoral immune parameters in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) were studied. Serum samples were collected from captive cod, of wild origin, kept at different temperatures for 12 months. It was found that immunoglobulin and natural antibody levels increased with increasing temperature whereas the total serum protein concentration, anti-protease activity, iron concentration, unsaturated and total iron binding capacity decreased with increasing temperature. Haemolytic activity and percentage iron saturation also tended to decrease with increasing temperature although this was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Magnadóttir
- Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Magnadóttir B, Jónsdóttir H, Helgason S, Björnsson B, Jørgensen TO, Pilström L. Humoral immune parameters in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) II. The effects of size and gender under different environmental conditions. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 1999; 122:181-8. [PMID: 10327608 DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0491(98)10157-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The effects of size and gender on several humoral immune parameters in cod were examined under different environmental conditions. Serum samples were collected from wild cod of different sizes. Two samplings were undertaken: In the spring in relatively cold waters off the north west coast of Iceland and in the fall in relatively warm waters off the west coast of Iceland. Most of the parameters increased with increasing cod size, except the haemolytic activity which decreased. Higher serum protein levels were seen in cod sampled in the fall than in the spring. In cod sampled in the spring there was an apparent difference between specimens < 75 cm in length and the larger specimens with respect to haemolytic activity and iron concentration. None of the parameters were influenced by the gender of the cod.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Magnadóttir
- Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, Reyjavík, Iceland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|