1
|
Pueyo-Périz E, Téllez-Marquès C, Radosevic A, Morató O, Visa L, Ilzarbe L, Berjano E, de Vicente E, Poves I, Ielpo B, Grande L, Burdío F, Sánchez-Velázquez P. Radiofrequency-assisted transection of the pancreas vs stapler in distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matched cohort analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7486. [PMID: 35523857 PMCID: PMC9076639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11583-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To demonstrate the efficacy of radiofrequency for pancreatic stump closure in reducing the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in distal pancreatectomy (DP) compared with mechanical transection methods. Despite all the different techniques of pancreatic stump closure proposed for DP, best practice for avoiding POPF remains an unresolved issue, with an incidence of up to 30% regardless of center volume or surgical expertise. DP was performed in a cohort of patients by applying radiofrequency to stump closure (RF Group) and compared with mechanical closure (Control Group). A propensity score (PS) matched cohort study was carried out to minimize bias from nonrandomized treatment assignment. Cohorts were matched by PS accounting for factors significantly associated with either undergoing RF transection or mechanical closure through logistic regression analysis. The primary end-point was the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF). Of 89 patients included in the whole cohort, 13 case patients from the RF-Group were 1:1 matched to 13 control patients. In both the first independent analysis of unmatched data and subsequent adjustment to the overall propensity score-matched cohort, a higher rate of CR-POPF in the Control Group compared with the RF-Group was detected (25.4% vs 5.3%, p = 0.049 and 53.8% vs 0%; p = 0.016 respectively). The RF Group showed better outcomes in terms of readmission rate (46.2% vs 0%, p = 0.031). No significant differences were observed in terms of mortality, major complications (30.8% vs 0%, p = 0.063) or length of hospital stay (5.7 vs 5.2 days, p = 0.89). Findings suggest that the RF-assisted technique is more efficacious in reducing CR-POPF than mechanical pancreatic stump closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pueyo-Périz
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - C Téllez-Marquès
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Radosevic
- Department of Radiology, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Morató
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Visa
- Department of Oncology, Hospital del Mar-IMIM-CIBERONC, Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Ilzarbe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Berjano
- BioMIT, Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - E de Vicente
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Poves
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Ielpo
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Grande
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Burdío
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Sánchez-Velázquez
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritim 25-29, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosato V, Gómez-Rubio P, Molina-Montes E, Márquez M, Löhr M, O'Rorke M, Michalski CW, Molero X, Farré A, Perea J, Kleeff J, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Greenhalf W, Ilzarbe L, Tardón A, Gress T, Barberá VM, Domínguez-Muñoz E, Muñoz-Bellvís L, Balsells J, Costello E, Iglesias M, Kong B, Mora J, O'Driscoll D, Poves I, Scarpa A, Ye W, Hidalgo M, Sharp L, Carrato A, Real FX, La Vecchia C, Malats N. Gallbladder disease and pancreatic cancer risk: a multicentric case-control European study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 30:423-430. [PMID: 34545020 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The overall evidence on the association between gallbladder conditions (GBC: gallstones and cholecystectomy) and pancreatic cancer (PC) is inconsistent. To our knowledge, no previous investigations considered the role of tumour characteristics on this association. Thus, we aimed to assess the association between self-reported GBC and PC risk, by focussing on timing to PC diagnosis and tumour features (stage, location, and resection). METHODS Data derived from a European case-control study conducted between 2009 and 2014 including 1431 PC cases and 1090 controls. We used unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for recognized confounders. RESULTS Overall, 298 (20.8%) cases and 127 (11.6%) controls reported to have had GBC, corresponding to an OR of 1.70 (95% CI 1.33-2.16). The ORs were 4.84 (95% CI 2.96-7.89) for GBC diagnosed <3 years before PC and 1.06 (95% CI 0.79-1.41) for ≥3 years. The risk was slightly higher for stage I/II (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.55) vs. stage III/IV tumours (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.76); for tumours sited in the head of the pancreas (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.24) vs. tumours located at the body/tail (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.62-1.68); and for tumours surgically resected (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.14-2.51) vs. non-resected tumours (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.88-1.78). The corresponding ORs for GBC diagnosed ≥3 years prior PC were close to unity. CONCLUSION Our study supports the association between GBC and PC. Given the time-risk pattern observed, however, this relationship may be non-causal and, partly or largely, due to diagnostic attention and/or reverse causation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Rosato
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Biometry, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - P Gómez-Rubio
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- CIBERONC, Spain
| | - E Molina-Montes
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Márquez
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Löhr
- Gastrocentrum, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M O'Rorke
- Centre for Public Health, Belfast, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C W Michalski
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - X Molero
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
- CIBEREHD
| | - A Farré
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona
| | - J Perea
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital 12 de Octubre
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - T Crnogorac-Jurcevic
- Barts Cancer Institute, Centre for Molecular Oncology, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London
| | - W Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - L Ilzarbe
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona
| | - A Tardón
- Department of Medicine, Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo
- CIBERESP, Spain
| | - T Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - V M Barberá
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, General University Hospital of Elche
| | - E Domínguez-Muñoz
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
| | - L Muñoz-Bellvís
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Salamanca University Hospital, Elche, Santiago de Compostela, and Salamanca, Spain
| | - J Balsells
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
- CIBEREHD
| | - E Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Iglesias
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona
| | - Bo Kong
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - J Mora
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona
| | - D O'Driscoll
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - I Poves
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona
| | - A Scarpa
- ARC-Net centre for Applied Research on Cancer and Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - W Ye
- Gastrocentrum, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Hidalgo
- Madrid-Norte-Sanchinarro Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Sharp
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Newcastle University, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle, UK
| | - A Carrato
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- Department of Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, Alcala University
| | - F X Real
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- Epithelial Carcinogenesis Group
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid
- Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - N Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid
- CIBERONC, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balduzzi A, van Hilst J, Korrel M, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, van den Boezem P, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, van Dam R, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Ercolani G, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Forgione A, Gayet B, Gomez D, Koerkamp BG, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Krautz C, Marudanayagam R, Menon K, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Cunha AS, Salvia R, Sánchez-Cabús S, Soonawalla Z, Hilal MA, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic versus open extended radical left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international propensity-score matched study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6949-6959. [PMID: 33398565 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08206-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A radical left pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may require extended, multivisceral resections. The role of a laparoscopic approach in extended radical left pancreatectomy (ERLP) is unclear since comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after laparoscopic vs open ERLP in patients with PDAC. METHODS An international multicenter propensity-score matched study including patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open ERLP (L-ERLP; O-ERLP) for PDAC was performed (2007-2015). The ISGPS definition for extended resection was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival, margin negative rate (R0), and lymph node retrieval. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2015, 320 patients underwent ERLP in 34 centers from 12 countries (65 L-ERLP vs. 255 O-ERLP). After propensity-score matching, 44 L-ERLP could be matched to 44 O-ERLP. In the matched cohort, the conversion rate in L-ERLP group was 35%. The L-ERLP R0 resection rate (matched cohort) was comparable to O-ERLP (67% vs 48%; P = 0.063) but the lymph node yield was lower for L-ERLP than O-ERLP (median 11 vs 19, P = 0.023). L-ERLP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying (0% vs 16%, P = 0.006) and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs 13 days, P = 0.005), as compared to O-ERLP. Outcomes were comparable for additional organ resections, vascular resections (besides splenic vessels), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications, or 90-day mortality (2% vs 2%, P = 0.973). The median overall survival was comparable between both groups (19 vs 20 months, P = 0.571). Conversion did not worsen outcomes in L-ERLP. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach may be used safely in selected patients requiring ERLP for PDAC, since morbidity, mortality, and overall survival seem comparable, as compared to O-ERLP. L-ERLP is associated with a high conversion rate and reduced lymph node yield but also with less delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to O-ERLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
| | - J van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Lof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - A Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - U Boggi
- Department of Surgery, Universitá di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Butturini
- Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy
| | - R Casadei
- Department of Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - R van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Dokmak
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - M A Sahakyan
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - G Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna Forlì, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J M Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Hopital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - M Falconi
- San Raffaele Hospital Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Forgione
- Department of Surgery, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Gomez
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - T Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - I Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - C Krautz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Marudanayagam
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - I Poves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Sa Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - R Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - S Sánchez-Cabús
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Z Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. .,HPB and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morató O, Poves I, Burdío F, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Duran X, Grande L. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy by CUSUM analyses. Cohort study. Int J Surg 2020; 80:61-67. [PMID: 32650295 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) remains an extremely demanding surgery. The purpose of this study was to describe the learning curve required for its safe implementation. METHODS Fifty consecutive patients undergoing LPD were retrospectively reviewed. The learning curve was clustered into 4 groups: A, B and C (initial phase, n = 10 each) and D (consolidation phase, n = 20). Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis was applied to operative time, conversion rate and severe postoperative complications. RESULTS No significant differences were observed among groups and phases concerning specific and general postoperative complications, oncological outcomes or mortality. The conversion rate significantly reduced from 90% (9) in Group A to 40% (4) in Group C (p < 0.01). Operative time was longer in the consolidation phase (median of 506 vs 437 min, p < 0.01). Conversely, hospital stays were shorter during the consolidation phase (8 vs 15 days, p < 0.01). CUSUM analysis identified 20-25cases as being enough to complete the learning curve if operative time and severe complications are analysed, while 40 cases would be needed for considering the conversion rate. CONCLUSIONS The learning curve in LPD can be completed after 20-25 procedures. This information will help to design programmes for introducing new surgeons to this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Morató
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - F Burdío
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - P Sánchez-Velázquez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - X Duran
- Department of Statistics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - L Grande
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Korrel M, Lof S, van Hilst J, Alseidi A, Boggi U, Busch OR, van Dieren S, Edwin B, Fuks D, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Malleo G, Poves I, Sahakyan MA, Bassi C, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. Predictors for Survival in an International Cohort of Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1079-1087. [PMID: 32583198 PMCID: PMC7801299 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08658-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Surgical factors, including resection of Gerota’s fascia, R0-resection, and lymph node yield, may be associated with survival after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but evidence from large multicenter studies is lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors for overall survival after DP for PDAC, especially those related to surgical technique. Patients and Methods Data from an international retrospective cohort including patients from 11 European countries and the USA who underwent DP for PDAC (2007–2015) were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed and included Gerota’s fascia resection, R0 resection, lymph node ratio, extended resection, and a minimally invasive approach. Results Overall, 1200 patients from 34 centers with median follow-up of 15 months [interquartile range (IQR) 5–31 months] and median survival period of 30 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 27–33 months] were included. Gerota’s fascia resection [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; p = 0.019], R0 resection (HR 0.70; p = 0.006), and decreased lymph node ratio (HR 0.28; p < 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival, whereas extended resection (HR 1.75; p < 0.001) was associated with worse overall survival. A minimally invasive approach did not improve survival as compared with an open approach (HR 1.14; p = 0.350). Adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.67; p = 0.003) was also associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions This international cohort identified Gerota’s fascia resection, R0 resection, and decreased lymph node ratio as factors associated with improved overall survival during DP for PDAC. Surgeons should strive for R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy and could also consider Gerota’s fascia resection in their routine surgical approach. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08658-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Lof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of General Surgery, Instituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - J van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, OLVG Oost, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Alseidi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - U Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Center, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - I Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - G Malleo
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - I Poves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Sahakyan
- Department of HPB Surgery, The Intervention Center, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - C Bassi
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Instituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Suárez-Piñera M, Visa L, Ilzarbe L, Zugazaga A, Poves I, Mestre-Fusco A, Iglesias M. PET/CT imaging with somatostatin analogues for the assessment of neuroendocrine tumours, initial experience. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
7
|
Suárez-Piñera M, Visa Turno L, Ilzarbe L, Zugazaga A, Poves I, Mestre-Fusco A, Iglesias M. PET/TC imaging with somatostatin analogues for assessment of neuroendocrine tumors, initial experience. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2019; 38:382-385. [PMID: 30826325 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PET with somatostatin analogues (SSA PET/CT) enables the detection of cells with overexpression of somatostatin receptors, especially subtypes 2 and 5; this detection is variable depending on the type of molecule used. This is the basis for its use in the study of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), which are characterized by an overexpression of these receptors in more than 80% of the subtypes. This PET is now being used in our country supported by the good results published by other groups, that were superior to those of other imaging techniques. We present two of the first cases of SSA-PET/CT with 68Ga-edotreotide (SomaKit TOC®) performed in our centre. SSA-PET/CT was the test that finally determined the clinical management of both patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Suárez-Piñera
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España.
| | - L Visa Turno
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - L Ilzarbe
- Servicio de Digestivo, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - A Zugazaga
- Servicio de Radiología, Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - I Poves
- Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - A Mestre-Fusco
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - M Iglesias
- Anatomía Patológica, Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Molina-Montes E, Gomez-Rubio P, Márquez M, Rava M, Löhr M, Michalski CW, Molero X, Farré A, Perea J, Greenhalf W, Ilzarbe L, O'Rorke M, Tardón A, Gress T, Barberà VM, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Domínguez-Muñoz E, Muñoz-Bellvís L, Balsells J, Costello E, Huang J, Iglesias M, Kleeff J, Kong B, Mora J, Murray L, O'Driscoll D, Poves I, Scarpa A, Ye W, Hidalgo M, Sharp L, Carrato A, Real FX, Malats N. Risk of pancreatic cancer associated with family history of cancer and other medical conditions by accounting for smoking among relatives. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 47:473-483. [PMID: 29329392 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Family history (FH) of pancreatic cancer (PC) has been associated with an increased risk of PC, but little is known regarding the role of inherited/environmental factors or that of FH of other comorbidities in PC risk. We aimed to address these issues using multiple methodological approaches. Methods Case-control study including 1431 PC cases and 1090 controls and a reconstructed-cohort study (N = 16 747) made up of their first-degree relatives (FDR). Logistic regression was used to evaluate PC risk associated with FH of cancer, diabetes, allergies, asthma, cystic fibrosis and chronic pancreatitis by relative type and number of affected relatives, by smoking status and other potential effect modifiers, and by tumour stage and location. Familial aggregation of cancer was assessed within the cohort using Cox proportional hazard regression. Results FH of PC was associated with an increased PC risk [odds ratio (OR) = 2.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-4.06] when compared with cancer-free FH, the risk being greater when ≥ 2 FDRs suffered PC (OR = 3.88; 95% CI: 2.96-9.73) and among current smokers (OR = 3.16; 95% CI: 2.56-5.78, interaction FHPC*smoking P-value = 0.04). PC cumulative risk by age 75 was 2.2% among FDRs of cases and 0.7% in those of controls [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.42; 95% CI: 2.16-2.71]. PC risk was significantly associated with FH of cancer (OR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.13-1.54) and diabetes (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01-1.52), but not with FH of other diseases. Conclusions The concordant findings using both approaches strengthen the notion that FH of cancer, PC or diabetes confers a higher PC risk. Smoking notably increases PC risk associated with FH of PC. Further evaluation of these associations should be undertaken to guide PC prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Molina-Montes
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - P Gomez-Rubio
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Márquez
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Rava
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Löhr
- Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Gastrocentrum, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C W Michalski
- Technical University of Munich, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
- University of Heidelberg, Department of Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - X Molero
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, and CIBEREHD, Spain
| | - A Farré
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Department of Gastroenterology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Perea
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Department of Surgery, Madrid, Spain
| | - W Greenhalf
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - L Ilzarbe
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M O'Rorke
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK
| | - A Tardón
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Department of Medicine, Oviedo, and CIBERESP, Spain
| | - T Gress
- University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Department of Gastroenterology, Marburg, Germany
| | - V M Barberà
- General University Hospital of Elche, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Elche, Spain
| | - T Crnogorac-Jurcevic
- Barts Cancer Institute, Centre for Molecular Oncology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - E Domínguez-Muñoz
- University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Department of Gastroenterology, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - L Muñoz-Bellvís
- Salamanca University Hospital, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Salamanca, Spain
| | - J Balsells
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, and CIBEREHD, Spain
| | - E Costello
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - J Huang
- Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Gastrocentrum, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Iglesias
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Kleeff
- Technical University of Munich, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
- Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Bo Kong
- Technical University of Munich, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
| | - J Mora
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Department of Gastroenterology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Murray
- Queen's University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK
| | - D O'Driscoll
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - I Poves
- Hospital del Mar-Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Scarpa
- ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer and Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - W Ye
- Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Gastrocentrum, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Hidalgo
- Madrid-Norte-Sanchinarro Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Sharp
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Newcastle University, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A Carrato
- Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Department of Oncology, IRYCIS, Alcala University, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - F X Real
- Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Epithelial Carcinogenesis Group, Madrid, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Barcelona, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - N Malats
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gomez-Rubio P, Rosato V, Márquez M, Bosetti C, Molina-Montes E, Rava M, Piñero J, Michalski CW, Farré A, Molero X, Löhr M, Ilzarbe L, Perea J, Greenhalf W, O'Rorke M, Tardón A, Gress T, Barberá VM, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Muñoz-Bellvís L, Domínguez-Muñoz E, Gutiérrez-Sacristán A, Balsells J, Costello E, Guillén-Ponce C, Huang J, Iglesias M, Kleeff J, Kong B, Mora J, Murray L, O'Driscoll D, Peláez P, Poves I, Lawlor RT, Carrato A, Hidalgo M, Scarpa A, Sharp L, Furlong LI, Real FX, La Vecchia C, Malats N. A systems approach identifies time-dependent associations of multimorbidities with pancreatic cancer risk. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1618-1624. [PMID: 28383714 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is usually diagnosed in late adulthood; therefore, many patients suffer or have suffered from other diseases. Identifying disease patterns associated with PDAC risk may enable a better characterization of high-risk patients. METHODS Multimorbidity patterns (MPs) were assessed from 17 self-reported conditions using hierarchical clustering, principal component, and factor analyses in 1705 PDAC cases and 1084 controls from a European population. Their association with PDAC was evaluated using adjusted logistic regression models. Time since diagnosis of morbidities to PDAC diagnosis/recruitment was stratified into recent (<3 years) and long term (≥3 years). The MPs and PDAC genetic networks were explored with DisGeNET bioinformatics-tool which focuses on gene-diseases associations available in curated databases. RESULTS Three MPs were observed: gastric (heartburn, acid regurgitation, Helicobacter pylori infection, and ulcer), metabolic syndrome (obesity, type-2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension), and atopic (nasal allergies, skin allergies, and asthma). Strong associations with PDAC were observed for ≥2 recently diagnosed gastric conditions [odds ratio (OR), 6.13; 95% confidence interval CI 3.01-12.5)] and for ≥3 recently diagnosed metabolic syndrome conditions (OR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.11-2.35). Atopic conditions were negatively associated with PDAC (high adherence score OR for tertile III, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.55). Combining type-2 diabetes with gastric MP resulted in higher PDAC risk for recent (OR, 7.89; 95% CI 3.9-16.1) and long-term diagnosed conditions (OR, 1.86; 95% CI 1.29-2.67). A common genetic basis between MPs and PDAC was observed in the bioinformatics analysis. CONCLUSIONS Specific multimorbidities aggregate and associate with PDAC in a time-dependent manner. A better characterization of a high-risk population for PDAC may help in the early diagnosis of this cancer. The common genetic basis between MP and PDAC points to a mechanistic link between these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Gomez-Rubio
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - V Rosato
- Branch of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology "G.A. Maccacaro," Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation, Milan
| | - M Márquez
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - C Bosetti
- Department of Epidemiology, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - E Molina-Montes
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Rava
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - J Piñero
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Pompeu Fabra Univeristy (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - C W Michalski
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Farré
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona
| | - X Molero
- Exocrine Pancreas Research Unit and Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
- Network of Biomedical Research Centres (CIBER), Hepatic and Digestive Diseases and Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Löhr
- Gastrocentrum, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Ilzarbe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Parc de Salut Mar University Hospital, Barcelona
| | - J Perea
- Department of Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - W Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool
| | - M O'Rorke
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - A Tardón
- Network of Biomedical Research Centres (CIBER), Hepatic and Digestive Diseases and Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University Institute of Oncology of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - T Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - V M Barberá
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, General University Hospital of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - T Crnogorac-Jurcevic
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK
| | - L Muñoz-Bellvís
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Salamanca University Hospital, Salamanca
| | - E Domínguez-Muñoz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela
| | - A Gutiérrez-Sacristán
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Pompeu Fabra Univeristy (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Balsells
- Exocrine Pancreas Research Unit and Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona
- Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
- Network of Biomedical Research Centres (CIBER), Hepatic and Digestive Diseases and Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool
| | - C Guillén-Ponce
- Department of Oncology, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - J Huang
- Gastrocentrum, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Iglesias
- Department of Gastroenterology, Parc de Salut Mar University Hospital, Barcelona
| | - J Kleeff
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool
| | - B Kong
- Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - J Mora
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona
| | - L Murray
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - D O'Driscoll
- Research Programme, National Cancer Registry Ireland
| | - P Peláez
- Department of Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Poves
- Department of Gastroenterology, Parc de Salut Mar University Hospital, Barcelona
| | - R T Lawlor
- ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer and Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - A Carrato
- Department of Oncology, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| | - M Hidalgo
- Clara Campal Integrated Oncological Centre, Sanchinarro Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Scarpa
- ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer and Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - L Sharp
- Research Programme, National Cancer Registry Ireland
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, UK
| | - L I Furlong
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Pompeu Fabra Univeristy (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - F X Real
- Epithelial Carcinogenesis Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C La Vecchia
- Branch of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology "G.A. Maccacaro," Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan
| | - N Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, and CIBERONC, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Quesada R, Poves I, Iglesias M, Berjano E, Grande L, Burdío F. Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for giant cyst using a radiofrequency-assisted device: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2016; 2:82. [PMID: 27558744 PMCID: PMC4996810 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-016-0206-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/23/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although radiofrequency-assisted devices have sometimes been used in partial splenectomy, this is not a common technique. This report describes the first case of laparoscopic partial splenectomy using an RF-assisted device (Coolinside) which allows both coagulation and transection of the parenchyma and eventually the protective coagulation of the remnant side. Case presentation A 27-year-old woman was found to have a giant hydatic cyst measuring 12.0 × 14.0 × 16.6 cm that mainly occupied the lower pole of the spleen and retroperitoneal space. The patient underwent a laparoscopic partial splenectomy using an RF-based device designed to accomplish both the coagulation and dissection of the splenic tissue. The estimated blood loss was less than 200 mL. Conclusions Even though RF ablation has traditionally been used for hepatic parenchymal transection, it seems equally suited to partial splenectomy. This device seems to provide good results, minimizing blood loss during partial splenectomy; however, randomized trials will be necessary to see if the results are superior to those of other techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Quesada
- Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona Doctor Aiguader 88, Barcelona, 08003, Spain.
| | - I Poves
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Iglesias
- Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Berjano
- Biomedical Synergy, Electronic Engineering Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Grande
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Burdío
- Unit of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
García-Barrasa A, Borobia FG, Pallares R, Jorba R, Poves I, Busquets J, Fabregat J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13:768-74. [PMID: 19082671 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0773-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2008] [Accepted: 11/24/2008] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of prophylactic antibiotics in acute severe necrotizing pancreatitis is controversial. METHODS Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was carried out at Bellvitge Hospital, in Barcelona, Spain. Among 229 diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis, 80 had evidence of necrotizing pancreatitis (34/80 patients were excluded of the protocol). Forty-six patients without previous antibiotic treatment with pancreatic necrosis in a contrast-enhanced CT scan were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous ciprofloxacin or placebo. Five patients were secondarily excluded, and the remaining 41 patients were finally included in the study (22 patients received intravenous ciprofloxacin and 19 patients placebo). RESULTS Comparing the 22 with intravenous ciprofloxacin and 19 with placebo, infected pancreatic necrosis was detected in 36% and 42% respectively (p = 0.7). The mortality rate was 18% and 11%, respectively (p = 0.6). No significant differences between both treatment groups were observed with respect to variables such as: non-pancreatic infections, surgical treatment, timing and the re-operation rate, organ failure, length of hospital and ICU stays. CONCLUSION The prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin in patients with severe necrotizing pancreatitis did not significantly reduce the risk of developing pancreatic infection or decrease the mortality rate. The small number of patients included in this study should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A García-Barrasa
- Department of General Surgery and Digestive Tract, Bellvitge Hospital, Idibell, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Jorba R, Moreno P, Farran L, Borobia F, Bettonica C, Poves I, Ramos E, Alcobendas F. Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction. Br J Surg 2005. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02497.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
13
|
Ballesta-López C, Poves I, Cabrera M, Almeida JA, Macías G. Learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with totally hand-sewn anastomosis: analysis of first 600 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:519-24. [PMID: 15742123 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9035-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2004] [Accepted: 10/08/2004] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a challenging operation for the treatment of morbid obesity with well-demonstrated effectiveness in weight lost. There are several variations to the technique. METHODS From September 2000 to July 2004, 600 consecutive patients underwent surgery for morbid obesity at our institution. The surgical technique employed was LRYGB with totally hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). All patients were considered candidates for laparoscopic approach regardless of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), or previous bariatric or digestive surgery. RESULTS Mean BMI was 44.4 +/- 7.6 kg/m2. Thirty-two patients had undergone previous failed bariatric procedures. Conversion to an open procedure was necessary in three patients. Seventy-two patients (12%) developed early complications, including 23 (3.8%) leaks at the GJA (eight in the first 18 patients). Mortality rate was 1.1% (one death was related to GJA leakage). Early and late reoperation rates were 5.3 and 1.8%, respectively. Rate plateau of morbidity and mortality was reached after the first 18 patients when the surgical technique was fully standardized. CONCLUSIONS LRYGB is a technically demanding procedure for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity with significant morbidity during the learning curve. The learning curve can be soon overcome, reaching a rate plateau of complications after adequate training. Morbidly obese patients should be operated on in expert bariatric surgical laparoscopic units to obtain the best results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ballesta-López
- Centro Laparoscópico de Barcelona, Centro Médico Teknon, Vilana 12, Suite 174, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bàllesta López C, Cid JA, Poves I, Bettónica C, Villegas L, Memon MA. Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly patient. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:333-7. [PMID: 12364996 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9056-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2002] [Accepted: 05/16/2002] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients represent a unique surgical challenge because of the associated complex comorbidity and diminished cardiopulmonary reserve. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery in the elderly may have a larger impact compared to the younger population. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the experience of laparoscopic surgery in patients >or=70 years of age in our unit. METHODS Two hundred and thirty-two patients (34 females and 98 males) older than 70 years who underwent various elective and emergency laparoscopic procedures between 1992 and 1997 were assessed prospectively. Preoperative comorbidity, operative results, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 76 years. The majority of patients were ASA class II. The mean hospital stay was 3.4 days. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 10.8% and 3.4% respectively, and the conversion rate was 4.3%. CONCLUSIONS Our experience suggests that laparoscopic surgery in the elderly is safe, is associated with short hospital stay, and produces less morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it should be adopted widely if the expertise in the area of laparoscopic surgery is available for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bàllesta López
- Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital de Bellvitge Prínceps d'Espanya, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ballesta Lopez C, Ruggiero R, Poves I, Bettonica C, Procaccini E, Corsale I, Mandato M, De Luca L. Laparoscopic procedures in patients who have previously undergone laparotomic operations. MINERVA CHIR 2003; 58:53-6. [PMID: 12692496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who have undergone laparotomy can undergo laparoscopic procedures and thus benefit from the advantages that the technique offers without significantly increasing the risk of the operation. METHODS We present the results of 240 patients, chosen at random who underwent laparoscopic procedures and who had already had 1 or more laparotomic abdominal operations. We carried out 180 cholecystectomies, 12 of which for acute inflammation of the gall bladder, 10 for acute biliary pancreatitis, 3 with exploration of the common bile duct, 45 Nissen fundoplication procedures, of which 16 with removal of the gall bladder, 4 subtotal gastrectomies, 2 GEAs, 2 left colectomies, 4 adhesiolyses. RESULTS The duration of the procedure varied from 40 to 300 minutes, and hospitalization time after the operation from 1 to 15 days, depending on the previous operation and on the laparoscopic procedure used. A traditional operation (conversion) became necessary in 1.35% of patients. Complica-tions arose in 4% of cases: 4 hematomas, 1 infected wound, 2 bile leaks and 2 bowel fistulas at low flow. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery in pa-tients who have previously undergone abdominal operations is difficult. The extent of conversions and complications can be contained within acceptable limits by choosing carefully the insertion point of the first trocar and dissecting the bowel with great precision.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ballesta-López C, Poves I, Bettónica C, Fuertes F, Espinós JC. Emergency laparoscopic treatment for acute massive bleeding of an esophageal ulcer. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:161. [PMID: 12399857 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-4230-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2002] [Accepted: 05/16/2002] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic fundoplication is now considered the treatment of choice for the management of severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications. The laparoscopic approach achieves the same good results as open surgery in elective surgery for GERD; it also has all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Today, laparoscopy plays also a significant role in a great variety of emergency abdominal situations and acute abdominal pain. A 30-year-old man was admitted to our center due to an upper gastrointestinal bleed caused by a esophageal ulcer over a Barrett's esophagus located in lower third of the esophagus. Two therapeutic esophagogastroscopies were done in 24 h, but urgent surgical intervention was indicated because of recurrent transfusion-demanding bleeding. A combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach was followed. Surgery began with a complete hiatal dissection, including the distal third of the esophagus, diaphragmatic crus, and wide retrogastric window. Intraoperative flexible esophagoscopy revealed an active ulcer bleeding on the right anterior quadrant in the lower esophagus. Two transfixive stitches were applied through the wall of the esophagus at the site indicated by the light of the flexible endoscope, and complete hemostasis was achieved. Finally, employing the anterior wall of the fundus, a short Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication was performed. The operating time was 140 min. There were no complications and there has been no recurrence of the bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ballesta-López
- Teknon Medical Center, Surgical Laparoscopic Unit, Vilana 12, Consulta 148, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ballesta Lopez C, Ruggiero R, Poves I, Bettonica C, Procaccini E. The contribution of laparoscopy to the treatment of gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:616-9. [PMID: 11972200 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9022-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2001] [Accepted: 08/02/2001] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy plays a role in the preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer, particularly in determining the location and extent of the neoplasia. In addition to its use in staging, laparoscopy is indicated for the gastric resection of T1-T2, and its middle- and long-term results are comparable to those obtainable with open surgery. Herein we describe our experience with the laparoscopic resection of gastric carcinomas, including the dissection of lymph nodes and the Billroth II reconstruction of digestive continuity with gastrojejunostomia. METHODS We carried out laparoscopic gastric resections in 25 patients with adenocarcinomas. Our method involved installing five trocars, tying the left and right gastric vessels and the right gastro-epiploic vessels, sectioning the duodenum 3 cm from the pylorus, sectioning the remaining portion of the stomach obliquely 3 cm from the cardias, and performing Billroth II reconstruction. RESULTS The average duration of the operation was 4 h 45 min. The average number of removed lymph nodes was 30.5 (range, 22-41). Five patients were converted to laparotomy. Significant complications were observed in four cases (16%). Hospitalization ranged from 5 to 16 days. The average follow-up was 38 months (range, 7-63), without evidence of relapse. CONCLUSION In terms of morbidity, our results were similar to those obtained with open surgery. Lymphectomy according to the extent and number of lymph nodes is acceptable in the treatment of tumors of the lower third of the stomach. More case studies are needed to provide further indications of the applicability of the technique (which is currently used only in a few centers) and long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ballesta Lopez
- Centro Laparoscopico de Barcelona, C. Vilana-Vilana 12, 08022 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ballesta Lopez C, Ruggiero R, Poves I, Bettonica C, Procaccini E, Iervolino E. Laparoscopy in acute biliary pancreatitis. Panminerva Med 2001; 43:233-7. [PMID: 11677416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high mortality rates (20-30%) still occurring in some forms of acute pancreatitis demands adequate clinical and instrumental protocols in order to establish the most suitable therapeutic option to employ. The use of laparoscopic surgery can reduce hospital stay and time for functional recovery. METHODS The study enrolled 73 patients referring for acute biliary pancreatitis in whom staging with clinical, laboratory and instrumental criteria was performed. According to Ranson classification 63 patients (86.3%) had a mild-moderate acute biliary pancreatitis, 10 (13.6%) a severe one. In the first group laparoscopic cholecystectomy with retrograde cholangiography was performed within seven days of admission, in the second group surgical procedure followed medical treatment between eight and 30 days after the onset of the disease. No preoperative ERCP was performed. RESULTS The rate of main biliary tract calculosis was 8.2% in group A: six cases all treated through laparoscopy. Two switches (2.7%) due to intolerance to the pneumoperitoneum, eight major postoperative complications (10.9%), and two deaths (2.7%) occurred and a mean hospital stay of 7.4 days was observed in group A versus 8.2 days in group B. CONCLUSIONS The management suggested in this study for mild-moderate acute biliary pancreatitis showed consistent results with those of the recent literature, as far as morbidity (6.3%) and mortality (1.5%) are concerned. A higher number of severe biliary pancreatitis (10 cases) should be observed to assess the role of ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy rather than laparoscopic or combined treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Borobia FG, Fabregat J, Jorba R, Poves I, Biondo S, Serrano T, Figueras J, Jaurrieta E. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency caused by a somatostatinoma of the minor and major duodenal papilla in a patient with neurofibromatosis. Eur J Surg 2001; 167:154-6. [PMID: 11266260 DOI: 10.1080/110241501750070664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F G Borobia
- Department of General Surgery and Pathology, Ciudad Sanitaria y Universitaria de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Borobia FG, Biondo S, Jorba R, Moreno P, Fabregat J, Poves I, Jaurrieta E. [Emergency cephaloduodenopancreatectomy after massive ingestion of caustics]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2000; 92:615-6. [PMID: 11138247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
|
21
|
Poves I, Fabregat J, Biondo S, Jorba R, Borobia FG, Lladó L, Figueras J, Jaurrieta E. Results of treatment in severe acute pancreatitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2000; 92:586-94. [PMID: 11138240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM To analyze our results in the management of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), especially in patients who required surgery. METHODS In a retrospective study, 90 patients admitted between January 1992 and January 1998 were diagnosed as having SAP on the basis of clinical and radiological criteria. Contrast-enhanced tomography (CT) was done in all patients. The surgical technique of choice was necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage. RESULTS Seventy percent of the patients (63/90) had pancreatic necrosis. Tomography had a sensitivity of 73% in detecting necrosis. Forty-nine patients (54%) needed surgery: 31 had infected SAP and 18 had sterile pancreatitis. Overall mortality rate was 25.6% (23/90); mortality was 43.8% (14/32) in patients with infected pancreatitis and 15.5% (9/58) in those with sterile SAP (p < 0.05). The mortality rate was 44.4% higher (8/18) in patients with sterile SAP who were operated on. Patients with infected SAP who were operated on during the first week of admission had a higher mortality rate (81%) than those operated on after the first week (20%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic necrosis and infection are the most important prognostic factors in the course of SAP. The sooner the patients are operated on, the worse the prognosis, especially if there is infection. Efforts should be aimed at avoiding the onset of infection and organ failure, and at delaying surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Poves
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Princeps d'Espanya, Ciudad Sanitaria y Universitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jorba R, Fabregat J, Borobia FG, Torras J, Poves I, Jaurrieta E. Small bowel necrosis in association with early postoperative enteral feeding after pancreatic resection. Surgery 2000; 128:111-2. [PMID: 10876196 DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.104119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Jorba
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Princeps d'Espanya, CSUB, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alcobendas F, Jorba R, Poves I, Busquets J, Engel A, Jaurrieta E. Perforated colonic cancer. Evolution and prognosis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2000; 92:326-33. [PMID: 10927932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with perforating colonic cancer, among patients who need emergency surgery, should be considered to comprise a group with a worse prognosis. METHODS We retrospectively revised the clinical records for 91 cases of emergency primary resection for carcinoma of the colon, of which 22 were perforating (4 Dukes A, 10 Dukes B and 8 Dukes C) and 69 were obstructive (3 Dukes A, 30 Dukes B and 36 Dukes C). For purposes of comparison we also analyzed a synchronous series of 112 patients who underwent elective surgery. RESULTS There were no recurrences or deaths among the 7 patients with Dukes A disease (follow-up from 6 to 90 months), so these patients were excluded. In the 84 remaining emergency patients, 38 showed progression of the disease (13 local recurrence, 17 liver metastases, 4 lung, 3 peritoneal and 1 bone metastases). There were 26 deaths (6 patients with perforating and 20 with obstructive disease). There was no significant difference in survival or disease progression between patients with perforating and obstructive disease. CONCLUSIONS These results do not support the classical view of considering perforating cancer as a type with an especially ominous prognosis among patients who require emergency surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Alcobendas
- General Surgery and Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Príncipes de España, Ciudad Sanitario, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Borobia FG, Poves I, Aranda H, Puig I, Jorba R, Fabregat J, Jaurrieta E. [Hypogastric tumor and fever]. Rev Clin Esp 1999; 199:171-2. [PMID: 10230299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F G Borobia
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Universitaria de Bellvitge, Barcelona
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Poves I, Figueras J, Lama C, Fabregat J, Rafecas A, Torras J, Ramos E, Ruiz D, Casanovas T, Xiol X, Baliellas C, Jaurrieta E. [Is surgery for portal hypertension a contraindication for liver transplantation?]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 21:382-5. [PMID: 9844275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only curative treatment for hepatic cirrhosis and is the most effective in the control of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to analyze whether greater morbi-mortality is observed in patients undergoing liver transplantation with previous surgery for portal hypertension with respect to patients not having undergone this surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Different variables were analyzed in 2 groups of transplanted patients: one of 18 patients who had previously undergone surgery for portal hypertension and another group of 54 patients without this previous surgery. RESULTS The following factors were studied: mean operative time and length of anahepatic phase, intraoperative consumption of concentrates of erythrocytes, fresh frozen plasma, units of platelets and cryoprecipitates, days of mechanical ventilation, stay in the ICU and total postoperative stay. No significant differences were observed (p < 0.05) in any of these factors or in survival. DISCUSSION On analysis of the difficulty of surgical technique, postoperative evolution and survival and based on the variables described it may be concluded that previous surgery for portal hypertension does not only not contraindicate posterior liver transplantation, but rather may be useful in patients with an adequate hepative reserve presenting variceal hemorrhage since posterior transplantation does not present a worsened prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Poves
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, Hospital Prínceps d'Espanya, Barcelona
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Jorba R, Moreno P, Farran L, Borobia F, Bettonica C, Poves I, Ramos E, Alcobendas F. Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction. Br J Surg 1997. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800840224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
27
|
Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Jorba R, Moreno P, Farran L, Borobia F, Bettonica C, Poves I, Ramos E, Alcobendas F. Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction. Br J Surg 1997; 84:222-5. [PMID: 9052441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of left colonic emergencies has evolved in the past few decades. Recently, there has been increasing interest in resection with primary anastomosis in selected cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in outcome in patients with peritonitis or obstruction treated by resection, on-table lavage and primary anastomosis of the left colon. METHODS Between January 1992 and August 1995, 212 patients underwent emergency operation for a distal colonic lesion: 97 presented with peritonitis, 113 with obstruction and two with other indications. Intraoperative colonic lavage was performed in 37 patients with obstruction and in 24 with an acute intra-abdominal inflammatory process. RESULTS The postoperative mortality rate was 5 per cent. The incidence of clinical anastomotic leakage was 5 per cent. Wound infection was observed in ten patients (16 per cent), more often in those with peritonitis (P = 0.03). The overall mean(s.d.) hospital stay was 15(9) days. CONCLUSION Resection, on-table lavage and primary anastomosis constitute the operation of choice for selected patients with left colonic emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Biondo
- Department of Surgery, Ciudad Sanitaria y Universitaria de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Poves I, Muntaña X, Figueras J, Cañas C, Casanovas T, Rafecas A, Sancho C, Xiol X, Fabregat J, Baliellas C. TIPSS: a measure to control variceal bleeding before liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 1995; 27:2315-6. [PMID: 7652824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- I Poves
- Liver Transplant Unit, CSU Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|