Bias in Surgical Research

Hospitalize or discharge the emergency department patient with syncope? A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE

BACKGROUND

Syncope is a frequent reason for hospitalization from the emergency department (ED), but the benefit of hospitalization is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aims to cohere and synthesize the best current evidence regarding the potential benefit of hospitalization for ED syncope patients for developing an evidence-based ED syncope management guideline.

METHODS

We conducted a SRMA according to the patient-intervention-control-outcome (PICO) framework: In patients 16 years of age or older who present to the ED with syncope (population), does hospitalization (intervention) or direct ED discharge (comparison) improve short-term outcomes (outcome)? The primary outcome was a composite of all adverse events as defined by individual studies, up to 30 days. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. We measured heterogeneity among included studies with I-squared statistic and used GRADE criteria to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Our search strategy identified 2140 publications and included 18 publications (510,545 participants) in the analysis. All studies reported higher rates of adverse events in hospitalized patients (0.7%-43.8%) compared to discharged patients (0%-3.7%). Our meta-analysis detected considerable statistical heterogeneity. The GRADE assessment for all adverse events and all-cause mortality revealed risk ratios of >5 favoring ED discharge for both outcomes at a median follow-up of 30 days. However, point estimates are limited by serious risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness, and publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the uncertainty of the available evidence, this SRMA's findings do not support a recommendation for or against hospitalizing patients presenting to ED with syncope. However, discharging low-risk patients with syncope from the ED is associated with a low risk of short-term adverse events.

Comparing Conventional Double-Row With Transosseous Equivalent Suture Bridge Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Biomechanical studies have shown that the transosseous equivalent suture bridge (TOE-SB) rotator cuff repair technique improves contact areas and pressure between the tendon and footprint, which may facilitate healing. However, few studies have directly compared its outcomes with traditional double-row (DR) repair.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The primary objectives of this study were to (1) compare the functional outcomes of DR with TOE-SB fixation in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and (2) compare healing rates between the 2 groups and investigate whether any factors were associated with healing. It was hypothesized that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using DR repair would demonstrate no difference in disease-specific quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, or healing rates compared with TOE-SB repair.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

This was a cohort study conducted as a subanalysis of 2 larger randomized controlled trials. Patients ≥18 years old with degenerative rotator cuff tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging who had persistent symptoms of pain and functional impairment after 6 months of nonoperative management were enrolled in prospective randomized controlled trials and underwent either a traditional DR repair or a TOE-SB rotator cuff repair. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the Constant score at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Healing rates were determined using ultrasound at 24 months postoperatively.

Results

A total of 184 patients were included in this study; 34 patients underwent conventional DR repair and 150 underwent TOE-SB repair. Postoperative changes in the outcome measures from baseline were statistically significant for all outcomes in both groups (P < .0001). No statistically significant differences were found between outcomes at any of the follow-up times, except a significant difference in the Constant score at 24 months in favor of the DR group (mean ± SE, 80.5 ± 1.1 [95% CI, 78.4-82.7]) and TOE-SB and DR, respectively (mean ± SE, 85.7 ± 2.2 [95% CI, 81.2-90.1]) (P = .041). Healing rates were 77.8% for DR and 83% for TOE-SB (odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.53-3.38]; P = .53). Multivariable regression analysis showed a positive correlation between nonhealing rates and the rotator cuff tear size in the sagittal plane (odds ratio, 1.97 (95% CI, 1.02-3.78); P = .042).

Conclusion

No difference was found between DR and TOE-SB rotator cuff repair in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant strength subscore, or the healing rate. The Constant score at the 24-month follow-up favored DR repair but did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. An association was found between higher healing rates and smaller sagittal plane tear sizes.

Assessment of Outcomes by Intention-to-Treat Comparison for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Derived Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The overall treatment response among patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is poorly understood as most studies report solely on resected patients. We aimed to investigate the outcomes in patients with LAPC as an intention-to-treat-analysis from the time of diagnosis from a complete source population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational cohort study in a population-defined region within a universal healthcare system. All consecutive patients discussed at multi-disciplinary tumour board (MDT), aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with LAPC were included. Exposure was set as recommended treatment by MDT (i.e. upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, palliative treatment or best supportive care). Outcome measures were overall survival analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable analyses using logistic regression for odds ratios (OR) and Cox proportional hazard analysis for hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

In total, 8803 MDT events (6055 unique patients) with pancreatic disease were held during the study period. Some 1436 (24%) had pancreatic cancer, of which 162 (11%) had LAPC and 134 met the population-defined criteria. In overall survival analyses, the patients who were recommended neoadjuvant therapy (± surgery) demonstrated no significant difference to palliative chemotherapy (median 11.0 months vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.226). In multivariable analysis, adjusted OR for overall survival comparing the treatment groups was 0.27 (95% CI 0.02-3.29, p = 0.306) and Cox proportional HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.58-1.59, p = 0.865).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LAPC, survival was not statistically different between those recommended for attempt at neoadjuvant (± surgery) compared with those recommended palliative chemotherapy. The findings suggest that conversion/downstaging chemotherapy is successful in only a select few.

Analysis of Current Evidence in the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Proposal for a Reporting Guideline to Enhance Reproducibility and Comparability of Surgical and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endovascular therapy (EVT) has recently become the most widely used treatment method for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, the literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with studies assessing and reporting surgical and clinical outcomes in different ways, lacking standardization. We aimed to evaluate the quality of these studies and propose a reporting guideline focusing on essential elements to ensure reproducibility and comparability.

METHODS

After Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Eligible studies were observational or randomized, reported clinical and/or surgical outcomes of EVTs for IAs, included over 200 patients, and were published in English between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024. Studies were assessed focusing on key domains: (1) reporting on the baseline characteristics of the patient sample, (2) assessment and reporting on imaging methods and aneurysm characteristics, (3) reporting on pivotal concepts definitions, (4) reporting on operator(s) and staff characteristics, (5) reporting on anesthetic protocol, (6) reporting on antiaggregant and anticoagulation therapy, (7) reporting on surgical details, (8) assessing and reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, and (9) reporting retreatment details.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies comprising 79 604 patients were included. Our assessment revealed substantial gaps in the literature on EVTs for IAs, including deficiencies across all domains. An EndoIAs Reporting Guideline was developed, consisting of 74 items distributed across 10 domains, focusing on key surgical and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Substantial deficiencies were identified in data collection and outcomes reporting in the available literature on EVT for IAs, thereby impeding comparability and reproducibility and hindering the building of cumulative evidence. The aim of the proposed EndoIAs Reporting Guideline was to address these fundamental aspects and has the potential to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of future studies, thereby fostering the building of cumulative and reliable evidence of EVT for IAs.

Extent of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is an incomplete understanding regarding the extent of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in managing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and its effect on outcomes. This study aimed to assess and compare limited sinus surgery, full-house, extended and radical ESS for optimizing CRS outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

An online search in adherence with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Forty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Full-house ESS yielded greater improvements in SNOT-22 and endoscopy scores over limited ESS. Radical ESS improved nasal symptoms and reduced disease recurrence more than full house ESS, while extended ESS decreased revision ESS rates when compared to full-house ESS. Total ethmoidectomy reduced SNOT-22 scores more than limited ethmoidectomy. There was no difference in perioperative complications for all extents of ESS. When compared to limited ESS, full-house ESS yielded better patient symptom outcomes. Radical ESS demonstrated even greater reductions in nasal symptoms, while extended ESS additionally decreased revision surgery rates. Thus, in general, greater extent of ESS leads to better outcomes, while all extents of ESS are relatively safe.

Unravelling the Efficacy of Internal Quilting Sutures vs Doxycycline Instillations in Preventing Seroma Formation After Gynecomastia Surgery

Background

Seroma frequently presents as a challenge, following gynecomastia correction surgery. This calls for percutaneous aspiration of accumulated fluid, from the iatrogenic dead space. The authors utilized internal quilting sutures and doxycycline instillation to analyze and compare their roles in seroma prevention.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of intraoperative internal quilting sutures and doxycycline instillation, in preventing seroma formation and recurrence after gynecomastia surgery.

Methods

After local review board and ethics committee approval, the authors conducted this prospective single-center study of 120 gynecomastia patients with Rohrich's Grades I, II, and III, who underwent surgery between October 2023 and March 2024. Those belonging to Rohrich's Grade IV were excluded. Before surgery, the patients were divided into 3 cohorts of 40 individuals using a computerized randomization protocol. Cohort 1 underwent doxycycline instillation, Cohort 2 underwent internal quilting sutures, and no intervention was carried out in Cohort 3. Seroma diagnosis was confirmed clinically and the data were analyzed. All the patients were followed up for a month.

Results

The incidence of seroma formation, volume of seroma fluid removed, and the number of visits for seroma care were statistically found to be the least in the quilting group compared with the doxycycline and control groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients belonging to both doxycycline and control groups showed significantly higher risk for seroma formation with an odds ratio of 4.705 and 6.524, respectively.

Conclusions

Doxycycline instillation was less effective than internal quilting sutures in preventing seroma formation. Internal quilting sutures are a safe effective, and undemanding adjuvant technique to reduce the rate of formation and recurrence of seroma, after gynecomastia surgery.

Level of Evidence 2

Surgical Intelligence Can Lead to Higher Adoption of Best Practices in Minimally Invasive Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of surgical intelligence for automatically monitoring critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a real-world quality initiative.

BACKGROUND

Surgical intelligence encompasses routine, artificial intelligence-based capture and analysis of surgical video, and connection of derived data with patient and outcomes data. These capabilities are applied to continuously assess and improve surgical quality and efficiency in real-world settings.

METHODS

Laparoscopic cholecystectomies conducted at 2 general surgery departments between December 2022 and August 2023 were routinely captured by a surgical intelligence platform, which identified and continuously presented CVS adoption, surgery duration, complexity, and negative events. In March 2023, the departments launched a quality initiative aiming for 75% CVS adoption.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-nine procedures were performed during the study. Adoption increased from 39.2% in the 3 preintervention months to 69.2% in the final 3 months ( P < 0.001). Monthly adoption rose from 33.3% to 75.7%. Visualization of the cystic duct and artery accounted for most of the improvement; the other 2 components had high adoption throughout. Procedures with full CVS were shorter ( P = 0.007) and had fewer events ( P = 0.011) than those without. OR time decreased following intervention ( P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intelligence facilitated a steady increase in CVS adoption, reaching the goal within 6 months. Low initial adoption stemmed from a single CVS component, and increased adoption was associated with improved OR efficiency. Real-world use of surgical intelligence can uncover new insights, modify surgeon behavior, and support best practices to improve surgical quality and efficiency.

How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript

Objectives

The peer review process is critical to maintaining quality, reliability, novelty, and innovation in the scientific literature. However, the teaching of scientific peer review is rarely a component of formal scientific or clinical training, and even the most experienced peer reviewers express interest in continuing education. The objective of this review article is to summarize the collective perspectives of experienced journal editors about how to be a good reviewer in a step-by-step guide that can serve as a resource for the performance of peer review of a scientific manuscript.

Methods

This is a narrative review.

Results

A review of the history and an overview of the modern-day peer review process are provided with attention to the role played by the reviewer, including important reasons for involvement in scientific peer review. The general components of a scientific peer review are described, and a model for how to structure a peer review report is provided. These concepts are also summarized in a reviewer checklist that can be used in real-time to develop and double-check one's reviewer report before submitting it.

Conclusions

Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining quality in the scientific literature. Peer review of a scientific manuscript and the associated reviewer's report should assess specific details related to the accuracy, validity, novelty, and interpretation of a study's results. We hope that this article will serve as a resource and guide for reviewers of all levels of experience in the performance of peer review of a scientific manuscript.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in brain arteriovenous malformations treated with open surgery research: a systematic review and proposal of a reporting guideline for surgical and clinical outcomes

Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIALLY MODIFIABLE FACTORS TO IMPROVE RECOGNITION AND OUTCOME OF NECROTIZING SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS

ABSTRACT

Background : Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) present a surgical emergency of increasing incidence, which is often misdiagnosed and associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. A retrospective multicenter (11 hospitals) cohort study was initiated to identify the early predictors of misdiagnosis, mortality, and morbidity (skin defect size and amputation). Methods : Patients of all ages who presented with symptoms and were admitted for acute treatment of NSTIs between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify early predictors (available before or during the first debridement surgery), with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results : The median age of the cohort (N = 216) was 59.5 (interquartile range = 23.6) years, of which 138 patients (63.9%) were male. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections most frequently originated in the legs (31.0%) and anogenital area (30.5%). More than half of the patients (n = 114, 54.3%) were initially misdiagnosed. Thirty-day mortality was 22.9%. Amputation of an extremity was performed in 26 patients (12.5%). Misdiagnosis was more likely in patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (β = 0.20, P = 0.001), and less likely when symptoms started in the anogenital area (β = -1.20, P = 0.003). Besides the established risk factors for mortality (septic shock and age), misdiagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (β = 1.03, P = 0.01). The strongest predictors of the final skin defect size were septic shock (β = 2.88, P < 0.001) and a skin-sparing approach to debridement (β = -1.79, P = 0.002). Conclusion : Recognition of the disease is essential for the survival of patients affected by NSTI, as is adequate treatment of septic shock. The application of a skin-sparing approach to surgical debridement may decrease morbidity.

Potential types of bias when estimating causal effects in environmental research and how to interpret them

To inform environmental policy and practice, researchers estimate effects of interventions/exposures by conducting primary research (e.g., impact evaluations) or secondary research (e.g., evidence reviews). If these estimates are derived from poorly conducted/reported research, then they could misinform policy and practice by providing biased estimates. Many types of bias have been described, especially in health and medical sciences. We aimed to map all types of bias from the literature that are relevant to estimating causal effects in the environmental sector. All the types of bias were initially identified by using the Catalogue of Bias (catalogofbias.org) and reviewing key publications (n = 11) that previously collated and described biases. We identified 121 (out of 206) types of bias that were relevant to estimating causal effects in the environmental sector. We provide a general interpretation of every relevant type of bias covered by seven risk-of-bias domains for primary research: risk of confounding biases; risk of post-intervention/exposure selection biases; risk of misclassified/mismeasured comparison biases; risk of performance biases; risk of detection biases; risk of outcome reporting biases; risk of outcome assessment biases, and four domains for secondary research: risk of searching biases; risk of screening biases; risk of study appraisal and data coding/extraction biases; risk of data synthesis biases. Our collation should help scientists and decision makers in the environmental sector be better aware of the nature of bias in estimation of causal effects. Future research is needed to formalise the definitions of the collated types of bias such as through decomposition using mathematical formulae.

Liver transplantation in colorectal metastases. Is there an indication for this procedure?

Almost 25 % of patients with colorectal cancer present metastases at the time of diagnosis and 50 % go on to develop metastases in the course of the disease. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment although only between 20 % and 30 % of patients present resectable lesions. Although liver transplantation is contraindicated in unresectable metastases of colorectal cancer, ever since the publication of the results of a pilot study there has been renewed interest in transplantation in these patients. In two consecutive trials overall and recurrence-free 5-year survival rates of 83 % and 35 % respectively, have been reported, Currently several trials are ongoing which are expected to allow the patient selection criteria for the indication of liver transplantation to be refined.

Peritoneal Flap for Lymphocele Prophylaxis Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Lymph Node Dissection: The Randomised Controlled Phase 3 PELYCAN Trial

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic lymphoceles (SLCs) after transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are common. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of peritoneal flaps (PFs) on lymphocele (LC) reduction is inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

To show that addition of PFs leads to a reduction of postoperative SLCs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

An investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, adaptive, phase 3 RCT was conducted. Recruitment took place from September 2019 until December 2021; 6-month written survey-based follow-up was recorded. Stratification was carried out according to potential LC risk factors (extended PLND, diabetes mellitus, and anticoagulation) and surgeons; 1:1 block randomisation was used. Surgeons were informed about allocation after completion of the last surgical step.

INTERVENTION

To create PFs, the ventral peritoneum was incised bilaterally and fixated to the pelvic floor.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was SLCs. Secondary endpoints included asymptomatic lymphoceles (ALCs), perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In total, 860 men were screened and 551 randomised. Significant reductions of SLCs (from 9.1% to 3.7%, p = 0.005) and ALCs (27.2% to 10.3%, p < 0.001) over the follow-up period of 6 mo were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operating time was 11 min longer (p < 0.001) in the intervention group; no significant differences in amount (80 vs 103, p = 0.879) and severity (p = 0.182) of postoperative complications (excluding LCs) were observed. The survey-based follow-up might be a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest RCT evaluating PF creation for LC prevention and met its primary endpoint, the reduction of SLCs. The results were consistent among all subgroup analyses including ALCs. Owing to the subsequent reduction of burden for patients and the healthcare system, establishing PFs should become the new standard of care.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A new technique-creation of bilateral peritoneal flaps-was added to the standard procedure of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for lymph node removal. It was safe and decreased lymphocele development, a common postoperative complication and morbidity. Hence, it should become a standard procedure.

PROMISE: effect of protein supplementation on fat-free mass preservation after bariatric surgery, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Protein malnutrition after bariatric surgery is a severe complication and leads to significant morbidity. Previous studies have shown that protein intake and physical activity are the most important factors in the preservation of fat-free mass during weight loss. Low protein intake is very common in patients undergoing bariatric surgery despite dietary counseling. Protein powder supplements might help patients to achieve the protein intake recommendations after bariatric surgery and could therefore contribute to preserve fat-free mass. This double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention study aims to assess the effect of a daily consumed clear protein powder shake during the first 6 months after bariatric surgery on fat-free mass loss in the first 12 months after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Inclusion will take place at the outpatient clinic of the bariatric expertise center for obesity of the Maasstad Hospital. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group before surgery. The intervention group will receive a clear protein powder shake of 200 ml containing 20 g of whey protein dissolved in water which should be taken daily during the first 6 months after LRYGB on top of their normal postoperative diet. The control group will receive an isocaloric, clear, placebo shake containing maltodextrine. Postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapeutical guidance will be standardized and similar in both groups. Also, both groups will receive the same dietary advice from specialized dieticians. The main study parameter is the percentage of fat-free mass loss 6 months after surgery, assessed by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol, version 2 (February 20, 2022) has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U) (NL 80414.100.22). The results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05570474. Registered on October 5, 2022.

Homogeneity in Surgical Series: Image Reporting to Improve Evidence

Good clinical practice guidelines are based on randomized controlled trials or clinical series; however, technical performance bias among surgical trials is under-assessed. The heterogeneity of technical performance within different treatment groups diminishes the level of evidence. Surgeon variability with different levels of experience-technical performance levels even after certification-influences surgical outcomes, especially in complex procedures. Technical performance quality correlates with the outcomes and costs and should be measured by image or video-photographic documentation of the surgeon's view field during the procedures. Such consecutive, completely documented, unedited observational data-in the form of intra-operative images and a complete set of eventual radiological images-improve the surgical series' homogeneity. Thereby, they might reflect reality and contribute towards making necessary changes for evidence-based surgery.

Vitreoretinal Surgical Instrument Tracking in Three Dimensions Using Deep Learning

Purpose

To evaluate the potential for artificial intelligence-based video analysis to determine surgical instrument characteristics when moving in the three-dimensional vitreous space.

Methods

We designed and manufactured a model eye in which we recorded choreographed videos of many surgical instruments moving throughout the eye. We labeled each frame of the videos to describe the surgical tool characteristics: tool type, location, depth, and insertional laterality. We trained two different deep learning models to predict each of the tool characteristics and evaluated model performances on a subset of images.

Results

The accuracy of the classification model on the training set is 84% for the x-y region, 97% for depth, 100% for instrument type, and 100% for laterality of insertion. The accuracy of the classification model on the validation dataset is 83% for the x-y region, 96% for depth, 100% for instrument type, and 100% for laterality of insertion. The close-up detection model performs at 67 frames per second, with precision for most instruments higher than 75%, achieving a mean average precision of 79.3%.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that trained models can track surgical instrument movement in three-dimensional space and determine instrument depth, tip location, instrument insertional laterality, and instrument type. Model performance is nearly instantaneous and justifies further investigation into application to real-world surgical videos.

Translational Relevance

Deep learning offers the potential for software-based safety feedback mechanisms during surgery or the ability to extract metrics of surgical technique that can direct research to optimize surgical outcomes.

Pharyngocutaneous Fistula Following Primary Total Laryngectomy: a Meta-analysis

Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most common complication which significantly increases morbidity. High-level evidence is lacking that determines the PCF rates in the primary laryngectomy. The main objective of this study was to systematically identify the factors leading to the PCF formation in primary laryngectomy. Human studies reporting at least one risk factor for developing PCF in patients undergoing primary total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer were included. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for the data extraction. Risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized trial tool was used. Cochrane's Q test and Higgin's I 2-heterogeneity was applied. The Mantel-Haenszel and DerSimonian Laird method was employed. Odds ratio was calculated for each risk factor, a P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. PROSPERO registration CRD42021248382. The meta-analysis comprised a total of 2446 patients in 14 included non-randomized studies. The among the analyzed risk factors-comorbidities (OR 2.781, R: 1.892-4.088, P < 0.001), site of tumor (OR 4.485, R: 3.003-6.699, P < 0.001), low pre-operative hemoglobin (OR 3.590, R: 2.130-6.050, P < 0.001), low pre-operative albumin (OR 2.833, R: 1.596-5.031, P < 0.001), utilization of surgical staplers (OR 0.172, R: 0.064-0.460, P < 0.001) (protective effect), positive mucosal margin (OR 4.92 R: 1.90-12.75, P = 0.001). The risk factors for PCF in patients undergoing primary TL included comorbidities, hypopharyngeal involvement, pre-operative hemoglobin and albumin, stapler usage, and positive mucosal margin. Level of Evidence - III.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01581-z.

Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy

We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.

Pitfalls in Study Interpretation

Background: The goal of a randomized or observational study is to develop an unbiased and reliable answer to a therapeutic question. However, there are multiple pitfalls in the reporting and interpretation of data that can compromise our ability to evaluate the pragmatism and the effectiveness of the intervention being studied. Researchers must be conscious of these biases when designing their studies, just as readers must be aware of these potential pitfalls when interpreting results. Results: The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the more common sources of bias in clinical research, including internal and external validity, type 1 and type 2 error, reporting of secondary outcomes, the use of subgroup analyses, and multiple comparisons. This article also discusses potential solutions to these issues, including using the fragility index to understand the robustness of study conclusions, and generating an E value to determine the degree of unmeasured confounding in a study. Conclusions: With an understanding of these pitfalls, readers can critically review scientific literature and ascertain the validity of the conclusions.

Adjunctive surgery versus medical treatment among patients with cavitary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection is recommended as adjunctive treatment for multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) in certain scenarios; however, data are limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of surgery by comparing TB outcomes among patients with cavitary disease who received medical versus combined medical and surgical treatment.

METHODS

A cohort of all patients with cavitary MDR or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB treated in Tbilisi, Georgia, between 2008 and 2012. Patients meeting indications for surgery underwent adjunctive resection in addition to medical treatment. We compared TB outcomes (proportions achieving cure/complete) among patients who received adjunctive surgery to those who received medical treatment alone using an adjusted robust Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Among 408 patients, 299 received medical treatment alone and 109 combined medical and surgical treatment. Patients in the non-surgical group were older and had higher rates of tobacco and alcohol use and bilateral disease compared to the surgical group. Patients in the surgical group had higher rates of XDR disease (28% vs 15%). Favourable outcomes were higher among the surgical versus non-surgical group cohort (76% vs 41%). After adjusting for multiple factors, the association between adjunctive resection and favourable outcome remained (adjusted risk ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.0); the relationship was also observed in secondary models that excluded patients with bilateral disease (contraindication for surgery) and patients receiving <6 months of treatment. Major postoperative complications occurred among 8 patients (7%) with no postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive surgery is safe and may improve the effectiveness of treatment among select patients with cavitary MDR- and XDR-TB.

National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK

Embryo transfer (ET) is one of the vital steps in the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) process, yet there is wide variation in ET technique throughout the UK, without a nationally approved standardised approach. The aim of this study was to gain contemporaneous information regarding the current clinical ET practice in the UK.

METHOD

A 38-question electronic survey was distributed to the 79 UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) registered clinics performing ETs.

RESULTS

In total, 59% (47/79) of units responded, 83% (39/47) performing ultrasound-guided transfers, with 42% (20/47) of units using a tenaculum; 22% (10/45) would proceed with transfer regardless of fluid in the endometrial cavity. In 91% (43/47) of units, embryos were deposited in the upper/middle portion of the uterine cavity, but interpretation of this area ranged from 0.5 to >2 cm from the fundus, with 68% (32/47) allowing patients to mobilise immediately after transfer. In 60% (27/45) of clinics, success rates were based on clinical pregnancy rates (CPR).

CONCLUSION

Within the UK there is a wide range of variability in ET techniques, with >70% of discordance in survey-responses between clinics. Whilst there are areas of good practice, some disadvantageous techniques continue to persist. This survey emphasises the importance of developing a standardised, evidence-based approach to improve ET success rates.

Use of modified Delphi introduces the risk of chronological bias during clinical research interventions

BACKGROUND

A study aimed at reducing the time spent on the phone obtaining insurance preauthorisation in a neurosurgical clinic was successfully completed. However, the researchers were unable to reject the null hypothesis because of a combination of chronological bias and the Hawthorne effect.

AIM

To increase nurse researchers' awareness of the potential to introduce a chronological bias as a confounder in clinical research and suggest potential alternative approaches to study design.

DISCUSSION

The researcher shared the study's purpose, design and outcome measure with the participants before collecting the baseline data. This enabled the participants to alter their practice before the intervention was implemented (a chronological bias) and change their behaviour surrounding the outcome (the Hawthorne effect).

CONCLUSION

The use of the Delphi method became a catalyst for change before the collection of baseline data, the combination of chronological bias and the Hawthorne effect affecting the study's results.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurse researchers seeking to improve practice should collect baseline data before informing participants and consider the risks and benefits of blinding (concealment) surrounding the outcome.

A comparison of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with the concomitant excision of the distal ureter and bladder cuff is the current standard of care for the treatment of muscle invasive and/or high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In small uncontrolled studies, laparoscopic RNU has been suggested to be associated with better perioperative outcomes compared to open RNU. The aim of our study was to compare the perioperative oncological and functional outcomes of open RNU versus laparoscopic RNU after adjusting for preoperative baseline patient-related characteristics.

METHODS

We evaluated a multi-institutional retrospective database composed by 1512 patients diagnosed with UTUC and treated with open or laparoscopic RNU between 1990 and 2016. Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, as well as postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 and 90 days from surgery. A 1:1 propensity score matching estimated using logistic regression with the teffects psmatch function of STATA 13^® (caliper 0.2, no replacement; StataCorp LLC; College Station, TX, USA) was performed using preoperative parameters such as: age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score.

RESULTS

Overall, 1007 (66.6%) patients were treated with open and 505 (33.4%) with laparoscopic RNU. Open RNU resulted into shorter median operative time (180 vs. 230 min, P<0.001) and longer median hospital stay (10 vs. 7 days, P<0.001) in comparison to laparoscopic RNU. No statistically significant difference was identified for the other variables of interest (all P>0.05). At multivariable linear regression after propensity score matching adjusted for lymph node dissection and year of surgery, laparoscopic RNU resulted in longer operative time (coefficient 43.6, 95% CI 27.9-59.3, P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (coefficient -1.27, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.3, P=0.01) compared to open RNU, but the risk of other perioperative complications remained similar between the two treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic RNU is associated with shorter hospital stay, but longer operative time in comparison to open RNU. Otherwise, there were no differences in other perioperative outcomes between these surgical modalities even after propensity score matching. The choice to offer laparoscopic or open RNU in the treatment of UTUC should not be based on concerns of different safety outcomes.

Mitigating Biases in a Cohort Study: A Critical Examination of the Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis Study

Research bias, or the systematic errors of a study, can arise before, during, or after a trial ends. These biases hinder the internal validity of the study, which is the accuracy of a study's conclusions regarding the effects of an intervention on a given group of subjects. With the growing use of evidence-based medicine, there is a demand for high-quality evidence from the research community. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials are considered the highest level of evidence, followed by individual randomized controlled trials. However, most surgical trials cannot be conducted as randomized controlled trials because of factors such as patient preferences and lack of equipoise among surgeons. Therefore, surgical trials may lack features that are held as important standards for high-quality evidence, such as randomization and blinding. To demonstrate the biases that surgical trials may encounter, the authors examined a prospective cohort study, the Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis study. The authors focus on the challenges that arise during a surgical trial, including the design, implementation, and methods used to report the clinical evidence. By recognizing and addressing obstacles that exist in research, investigators will provide health care providers with high-quality evidence needed to make well-informed, evidence-based clinical decisions.

3-D endoscopy in surgery of pituitary adenomas, prospective evaluation of patient gain using basic outcome parameters

The present prospective cohort study evaluates the effect of three-dimensional (3-D) endoscopy on outcome in transphenoidal endoscopic surgery of pituitary adenomas compared to conventional two-dimensional (2-D) endoscopy. Prospective data was collected from patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for pituitary adenomas before and after the introduction of 3-D endoscopy. Patients, grouped by having 2-D or 3-D endoscopic surgery, were compared in regard to procedure time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, hospital stay, grade of resection and quality of life (QoL). Twenty-six patients having surgery with 2-D endoscopy were compared with 29 patients having surgery with 3-D endoscope. Only primary procedures were included. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. No statistically significant differences in outcome were noted with 3-D endoscopy. Procedure time, complication rate, hospital stay, rate of gross total resection and post-operative QoL were unaffected by surgical technique though there were non-significant increases in new pituitary insufficiency with 3-D endoscopy and diabetes insipidus with 2-D endoscopy. This prospective cohort study fails to show obvious outcome advantages with 3-D endoscopy in pituitary surgery using basic parameters including post-operative QoL. To our knowledge this is the first prospective study published on the matter, thus corroborating results from previous retrospective studies with similar results on 3-D neuroendoscopy and 3-D endoscopy in general. The main advantage of increased depth perception is more likely found in more complex extended transphenoidal skull base procedure.

Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing surgical intervention faced challenges due to complexities of surgery and made it more difficult for surgeons and methodologists than pharmaceutical providers to build a well-design, conduct RCT.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to address the methodological challenges of RCTs on surgical intervention and offer potential solutions.

METHODS

We searched PubMed in order to summarize 2-arm parallel randomized trials for surgical interventions published in 2013. The information regarding general characteristics, general methodological and special surgical characteristics related to surgical trials comparing alternative procedures was gathered.

RESULTS

Some 200 surgical trials were identified. The extent to which these trials in design, conduct and analysis differed substantially across items. The general information about sample size calculation (77.0%), lost to follow-up (71.5%), trial registration (55.5%), protocols of trials (56.0%), implementation of randomization (59.5%), concealment of randomization (56.0%); reporting of primary outcome as P value (67.0%). Surgery special information revealed that only 21.0% of trials considered surgeons' preference, approximately 12% to 50% of them controlled the quality of surgical interventions and none evaluated the effect of the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

There is much room for improvement concerning the reported designs, conduct, and analysis of surgical RCTs. Considering the difficulty of surgical RCTs, some other approaches, such as surgeons' eligibility, performance of pilot studies, or implementation of pragmatic RCTs/expertise-based trials, should be feasibly implemented to overcome the presented challenges.

Therapeutic effects and adaptive limits of an acellular technique by ultrapurified alginate (UPAL) gel implantation in canine osteochondral defect models

Background

The aim of this study was to clarify the objective therapeutic effects of an acellular technique by ultrapurified alginate (UPAL) gel implantation in canine osteochondral defect models.

Methods

Two osteochondral defects (diameters: 3.0 and 5.0 mm) were created on each patellar groove in both knees of 10 dogs. Defects were divided into four groups (n = 10 each): Group 1, untreated 3.0-mm defect; Group 2, 3.0-mm defect with UPAL gel; Group 3, untreated 5.0-mm defect; and Group 4, 5.0-mm defect with UPAL gel. All surgical procedures were performed by individuals unfamiliar with the technique at an independent institution. Articular surfaces were evaluated grossly and histologically at 27 weeks after operation.

Results

UPAL gel-treated osteochondral defects showed significantly improved gross appearance in Group 4 and histological appearance in Groups 2 and 4. Reparative tissues in the 3.0-mm defect with UPAL gel were replaced by hyaline-like cartilage tissue. The 5.0-mm defects with UPAL gel were mostly covered with fibrocartilaginous tissue, whereas UPAL gel-untreated defects mostly remained uncovered by any tissue.

Conclusions

Although an acellular technique using UPAL gel implantation significantly enhanced osteochondral repair in canines, reparative tissues of the large defect with alginate gel comprised of fibrocartilaginous tissue. This surgical technique is effective, especially for small cartilage injuries. Further improvements are required before clinical application in cases of severe osteochondral defects in humans.

Writing an Evidence-based Article in Plastic Surgery: Translating Research into High-quality Care

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a triad that integrates the physician's medical expertise and the patient's individual characteristics with the best available scientific evidence. As patients become more active in the clinical decision-making process, the application of evidence-based practice in the field of plastic surgery is more critical now than ever. As a field that is recognized by its innovation, plastic surgeons must understand the various aspects of EBM to enhance and keep the field at the top of medical discovery. Many initiatives have been implemented to guide researchers in the collection, analysis, and distribution of high-quality evidence. In particular, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery introduced a new EBM series to provide plastic surgeons with the appropriate resources to generate and integrate high-quality evidence into their practices. As a part of this initiative, this article will assist researchers in producing an evidence-based article that is well-written, relevant, and impactful to incorporate evidence-based practice into the specialty.

Oblique intradermal suture as a faster choice for intradermal closure: a randomized equivalence trial

Performing interrupted intradermal suture during bi-layered skin closure is time consuming. The oblique intradermal suture is hypothesized to be a faster choice for intradermal closure while yielding similar wound cosmetic outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the equivalence of wound outcomes between the interrupted oblique intradermal suture (OIS) and conventional interrupted intradermal suture (IS) methods. This prospective, multicenter, double-blind randomized equivalence trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery with a linear incision wound. A split-wound model was used. One half of the wound was sutured using IS method and the other using OIS method. Wounds were evaluated at 1 week and 2 months after surgery. Of the 120 patients, OIS was found to be equivalent to IS for all clinical outcome parameters. OIS was associated with 50% reduction in suture time and the number of stitches required, and a 40% reduction in suture material used (p < .001). Rates of wound dehiscence and infection were not different between methods. Wound outcomes using OIS were equivalent to those observed when using IS, except that OIS yielded reductions in suturing time, number of stitches and suturing material used. OIS is a cost and clinically effective wound closure method. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03001856 Meeting presentation: 7th Bozner Symposium of Plastic Surgery, Bozen, Italy, January 2017.

Rethinking bias and truth in evidence-based health care

In modern philosophy, the concept of truth has been problematized from different angles, yet in evidence-based health care (EBHC), it continues to operate hidden and almost undisputed through the linked concept of "bias." To prevent unwarranted relativism and make better inferences in clinical practice, clinicians may benefit from a closer analysis of existing assumptions about truth, validity, and reality. In this paper, we give a brief overview of several important theories of truth, notably the ideal limit theorem (which assumes an ultimate and absolute truth towards which scientific inquiry progresses), the dominant way truth is conceptualized in the discourse and practice of EBHC. We draw on Belgian philosopher Isabelle Stengers' work to demonstrate that bias means one thing if one assumes a world of hard facts "out there," waiting to be collected. It means something different if one takes a critical view of the knowledge-power complex in research trials. Bias appears to have both an unproductive aspect and a productive aspect as argued by Stengers and others: Facts are not absolute but result from an interest, or interesse: a bias towards a certain line of questioning that cannot be eliminated. The duality that Stengers' view invokes draws attention to and challenges the assumptions underlying the ideal limit theory of truth in several ways. Most importantly, it casts doubt on the ideal limit theory as it applies to the single case scenario of the clinical encounter, the cornerstone of EBHC. To the extent that the goal of EBHC is to support inferencing in the clinical encounter, then the ideal limit as the sole concept of truth appears to be conceptually insufficient. We contend that EBHC could usefully incorporate a more pluralist understanding of truth and bias and provide an example how this would work out in a clinical scenario.

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transanal total mesorectal excision is a novel and promising technique in the treatment of low and middle rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a single high-volume university hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with low and middle rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision with curative intent between 2007 and 2017 were recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision had been performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative, pathological, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between the transanal and laparoscopic groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 patients were selected from the whole sample of 316 patients with rectal cancer. After propensity score matching analysis, 46 patients for each group were compared. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision was associated with a higher conversion rate to open surgery (19.6% vs 0%, p = 0.002). Transanal total mesorectal excision showed a longer distal resection margin (15 mm vs 25 mm; p < 0.001), and similar results regarding the completeness of mesorectal excision and circumferential resection margin involvement, compared to laparoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative complications.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective design and the small size of the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal total mesorectal excision is a safe and feasible technique that results in a high-quality rectal cancer resection specimen and favorable 30-day postoperative outcomes.

APPLICABILITY OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN HAND SURGERY: SURVEY STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of randomized clinical trials and whether certain factors (surgeon experience/journal impact factor) influence their applicability.

METHODS

In this survey study we used the Pubmed/Medline database to select 32 consecutive randomized clinical trials published between 2013 and 2015, involving hand surgery (high/low impact). These studies were independently assessed by 20 hand surgeons (with more or less than 10 years of practice) who answered 4 questions regarding their applicability. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa and comparison of proportions via chi-square statistics. P-value <5% constituted statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 640 evaluations were produced, generating 2560 responses. A weak correlation was observed between less and more experienced respondents (kappa <0.2; range 0.119-0.179). Applicability between the least and most experienced respondents was similar (p = 0.424 and p = 0.70). Stratification by journal impact factor showed no greater propensity of applicability (p = 0.29) for any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low agreement was found between the respondents for the applicability of the randomized studies. Surgeon experience and journal impact do not seem to influence this decision. Level of Evidence II, Prospective comparative study.