Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence: a comparative study between hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and modern systemic chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2013;257:114-120. [PMID: 23235397 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e31827b9005]

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous arterial port Implantation for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) represents a valuable treatment option, with curative, palliative, or adjuvant intent. The aim of our study was to describe technical considerations, safety, and oncological outcomes of patients receiving HAIC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement in our institution between 2004 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic, anatomical and technical data were collected. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression-free survival (PFS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

A total of 360 patients (median age, 58.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 49.5-65.4]; 208 men [57.8%]) were included. Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement was successful in 87.9% of cases, resulting in 379 port placements (431 attempts). Overall, 394 HAIC courses were delivered, mostly oxaliplatin-based (94.7%), with a median of 6 cycles per course (IQR: 3-8). AEs (all grades) were observed in 42.0% of ports (grade IIIb-V: 1.1%). Most port dysfunctions could be resolved, resulting in a 73.1% rate of HAIC resumption, without impact on OS. Median OS was 22 months (IQR: 18-24), and median hepatic PFS was 11 months (IQR: 9.5-13). Tumor downstaging allowed surgery in 35.6% of patients, with significantly longer median OS than non-operated patients (39 months [IQR: 33-79] versus 14 months [IQR: 12-16], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective cohort study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement with an impact on survival for selected patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement is feasible, safe and effective with an impact on the survival of selected patients.

KEY POINTS

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy provides promising tumor response and overall survival, especially in cases of resection/ablation. Total complication rate of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy port use is high, but serious complications are rare. Port revision is often necessary but allows the resumption of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy without affecting overall survival.

Extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion after hepatic arterial infusion pump implantation: incidence and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the incidence of extrahepatic perfusion and incomplete hepatic perfusion at intraoperative methylene blue testing and on postoperative nuclear imaging in patients undergoing hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy.

METHODS

The first 150 consecutive patients who underwent pump implantation in the Netherlands were included. All patients underwent surgical pump implantation with the catheter in the gastroduodenal artery. All patients underwent intraoperative methylene blue testing and postoperative nuclear imaging (99mTc-Macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT) to determine perfusion via the pump.

RESULTS

Patients were included between January-2018 and December-2021 across eight centers. During methylene blue testing, 29.3% had extrahepatic perfusion, all successfully managed intraoperatively. On nuclear imaging, no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion was detected (0%, 95%CI: 0.0-2.5%). During methylene blue testing, 2.0% had unresolved incomplete hepatic perfusion. On postoperative nuclear imaging, 8.1% had incomplete hepatic perfusion, leading to embolization in only 1.3%.

CONCLUSION

Methylene blue testing during pump placement for intra-arterial chemotherapy identified extrahepatic perfusion in 29.3% of patients, but could be resolved intraoperatively in all patients. Postoperative nuclear imaging found no clinically relevant extrahepatic perfusion and led to embolization in only 1.3% of patients. The role of routine nuclear imaging after HAIP implantation should be studied in a larger cohort.

Recurrence patterns after complex multimodality therapy and hepatic arterial infusion for colorectal liver metastases: A reflection of biology and technique

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

We characterized colorectal liver metastasis recurrence and survival patterns after surgical resection and intraoperative ablation ± hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) placement. We estimated patterns of recurrence and survival in patients undergoing contemporary multimodal treatments. Between 2017 and 2021, patient, tumor characteristics, and recurrence data were collected. Primary outcomes included recurrence patterns and survival data based on operative intervention.

RESULTS

There were 184 patients who underwent hepatectomy and intraoperative ablation. Sixty patients (32.6%) underwent HAIP placement. A total of 513 metastases were ablated, median total of 2 ablations per patient. Median time to recurrence was 31 [22-40] months. Recurrence patterns included tumor at ablative margin on first scheduled postoperative imaging (8, 4.3%), local tumor recurrence at ablative site (69, 37.5%), and non-ablated liver tumor recurrence (38, 20.6%). In patients who underwent HAIP placement, the rate of liver recurrence was reduced (45% vs 70.9%, p = 0.0001). Median overall survival was 64 [41-58] months and prolonged survival was associated with HAIP treatment (85 [66-109] vs 60 [51-70] months.

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

Hepatic recurrence is common and combination of intraoperative ablation and HAIP treatments were associated with prolonged survival. These data may reflect patient selection however, future work will clarify preoperative tumor and patient characteristics that may better predict recurrence expectations.

Optimizing Adjuvant Therapy after Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastatic spread. Although metastasectomy is the gold standard for fit patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), their management after surgical treatment remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to collate the currently available data of the agents used in the adjuvant setting in order to define the most optimal therapeutic strategy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed/Medline and Cochrane library databases. We included studies that evaluated the efficacy, the tolerability and the safety profile of various chemotherapeutic agents that are used as adjuvant treatment after surgical resection of CRLMs. The outcomes of interest were regression-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and severe toxicities. From 543 initial articles, 29 publications with 7028 patients were finally included. In general, the results of the eligible studies indicated that adjuvant therapy after resection of CRLMs led to improved RFS/DFS rates, but this benefit did not contribute to a statistically significant prolongation of OS. Moreover, the choice of the therapeutic strategy, namely systematic or regional chemotherapy or the combination of both, did not seem to have a differential impact on patient outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution since the majority of the chosen studies are of low or moderate quality. In this context, further high-quality clinical trials conducted on patient sub-populations with modern therapies are required in order to reduce in-study and between-study heterogeneity and determine which patients are expected to derive the maximum benefit from adjuvant therapy after surgery for CRLMs.

A randomized phase II trial of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed (TOMOX) to those of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM).

METHODS

Patients with unresectable CRCLM were randomly assigned to receive HAI of TOMOX or FOLFOX. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) measured from the date of randomisation until the date of disease progression and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points were overall survival (OS) measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause, disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events.

RESULTS

113 patients were randomly assigned. With a median follow-up of 39.5 months, the PFS was 5.8 months [95% CI, 4.838-6.762]) and 4.6 months [95% CI, 3.419-5.781; P = 0.840], and the median OS was 17.6 months [95% CI, 13.828-21.372] and 13.1 months [95% CI, 11.215-14.985; P = 0.178] for the FOLFOX and TOMOX arm, respectively. The ORR were 26.1% vs 22.4% and DCR were 80.4% vs 71.4% in the FOLFOX and TOMOX arms. The most common severe adverse event was elevation of liver enzymes and pain, which did not differ in the two arms.

CONCLUSION

HAI chemotherapy was effective for unresectable CRCLM. HAI of FOLFOX has similar efficacy to TOMOX, and HAI of TOMOX had shorter arterial infusion time.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02557490.

Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in preventing liver metastasis from potentially curative colorectal cancer: A systematic review network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

Various chemotherapy administration methods have been used to prevent liver metastasis (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these different methods in preventing LM in CRC patients who underwent curative surgery.

METHOD

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery was conducted. The primary outcome was the LM rate.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 19 studies reporting on 12,588 participants, comparing portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVIC) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus systematic chemotherapy (SC) versus surgery alone. The HAIC group had the lowest LM rate when compared to the other three groups (odds ratio [OR] of PVIC vs. HAIC: 1.86; OR of SC vs. HAIC: 1.98; and HAIC vs. surgery alone: 0.43). The LM rate did not differ significantly between PVIC, SC, and surgery alone. The recurrence rates were lower for PVIC and HAIC than for surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.92] and 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.77]). The mortality rates of patients undergoing PVIC and HAIC were lower than that of patients undergoing surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64-0.93] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]). Anastomotic leakage, cardiopulmonary leakage, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, oral ulceration, wound infection, or ileus did not differ significantly between the four groups. PVIC showed the highest hepatic toxicity rate compared to those for SC, HAIC, and surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC might be a satisfactory method for preventing LM in patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy With Folfirinox or Oxaliplatin Alone in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC). Though HAI with oxaliplatin (HAI-Ox) is generally used, intravenous (IV) 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU)-oxaliplatin-irinotecan HAI (HAI-Folfirinox) is feasible and leads to curative-intent surgery in 30% of pretreated patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of HAI-Ox and HAI-Folfirinox.

Methods

Patients who underwent HAI chemotherapy for LMCRC were retrospectively included from 2008 to 2019 from six French expert centers.

Results

Data were collected from 273 previously treated patients with LMCRC. Patients received HAI-Folfirinox (n = 52) or HAI-Ox (n = 221) combined with IV chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 43.2% in patients with HAI-Folfirinox and 45.9% (ns) in patients with HAI-Ox. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months (95% CI: 15–32.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 26.2 months (95% CI: 19.4–34.4; p = 0.1) with HAI-Ox. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.9–10.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 6.4 months (95% CI: 6.0–7.7; p = 0.6) with HAI-Ox. The secondary liver resection rate was 35.6% with HAI-Folfirinox and 16.7% with HAI-Ox (p = 0.007). Grade 2 and above toxicities were significantly more frequent with HAI-Folfirinox. In the global population, only 2 factors were prognostic for OS in multivariable analyses: liver-only disease [hazard ratio (HR): 0.4; 95% CI 0.20–0.83; p = 0.013] and local complications of the catheter (HR: 3.8; 95% CI 1.6–9.0; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Hepatic arterial infusion results in high response rates, secondary resections, and long survival in pretreated patients with LMCRC.

Adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The practice of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) varies widely. This meta-analysis investigates the effectiveness of adjuvant HAIC and the influence of variations in HAIC treatment in patients with resected CRLM.

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed for this study. The search was limited to comparative studies (HAIC vs non-HAIC) for overall survival. Subgroup meta-analyses using random-effects were performed for type of intra-arterial drug, method of catheter insertion, use of concomitant adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, and study design.

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible studies were identified. After excluding overlapping cohorts, fifteen studies were included in the quantitative analysis, corresponding to 3584 patients. HAIC was associated with an improved overall survival (pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; 95%CI 0.64-0.93). Survival benefit of HAIC was most pronounced in studies using floxuridine (HR 0.76; 95%CI: 0.62-0.94), surgical catheter insertion with subcutaneous pump (HR 0.71; 95%CI: 0.61-0.84), and concomitant adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.75; 95%CI: 0.59-0.96). The pooled HR of RCTs was 0.91 (95%CI 0.72-1.14), of which only 3 used floxuridine.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant HAIC is a promising treatment for patients with resectable CRLM, in particular HAIC with floxuridine using a surgically placed catheter and a subcutaneous pump, and concomitant systemic chemotherapy.

Missing colorectal liver metastases: the surgical challenge

BACKGROUND

New chemotherapy schemes have allowed for a better radiological response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases, leading to an interesting scenario known as a complete radiological response. The aim of this study was to review the current management of missing liver metastases (MLM) from the liver surgeon's point of view.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on all publications of PubMed and Embase between 2003 and 2018. Meta-analysis was performed on MLM resected/unresected. Residual tumor or regrowth and relapse-free survival were used as evaluation indices.

RESULTS

After literature search, 18 original articles were included for analysis. The predictive factors for MLM are type and duration of chemotherapy and size and number of lesions. Magnetic resonance is the most sensitive preoperative technique. Regarding clinical management, liver surgery is deemed the fundamental pillar in the therapeutic strategy of these patients. Meta-analysis due to data heterogeneity was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the clinical context, MLM monitoring appears to be a valid therapeutic alternative. Nevertheless, prospective randomized clinical studies are needed.

Preoperative Hepatic and Regional Arterial Chemotherapy in Patients Who Underwent Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the addition of preoperative hepatic and regional arterial chemotherapy (PHRAC) on prognosis of stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) in a multicenter setting.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Our previous single-center pilot trial suggested that PHRAC in combination with surgical resection could reduce the occurrence of liver metastasis (LM) and improve survival in CRC patients.

METHODS

A prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2008 to December 2012 at 5 hospitals in China. Eligible patients with clinical stage II or III CRC who underwent curative resection were randomized to receive PHRAC plus adjuvant therapy (PHRAC arm) or adjuvant therapy alone (control arm). The primary endpoint was DFS. Secondary endpoints were cumulative LM rates, overall survival (OS), and safety (NCT00643877).

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients from 5 centers in China were randomly assigned (1:1) to each arm. The five-year DFS rate was 77% in the PHRAC arm and 65% in the control arm (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81; P = 0.001). The 5-year LM rates were 7% and 16% in the PHRAC and control arms, respectively (HR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.63; P < 0.001). The 5-year OS rate was 84% in the PHRAC arm and 76% in the control arm (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.86; P = 0.005). There were no significant differences regarding treatment related morbidity or mortality between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of PHRAC could improve DFS in patients with stage II and III CRC. It reduced the incidence of LM and improved OS without compromising patient safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00643877.

Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high rate of metastatic disease which is the main cause of CRC-related death. Oligometastatic disease is a clinical condition recently included in ESMO guidelines that can benefit from a more aggressive locoregional approach. This review focuses the attention on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and highlights recommendations and therapeutic locoregional strategies drawn from the current literature and consensus conferences. The different percutaneous therapies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation) as well as trans-arterial approaches (chemoembolization and radioembolization) are discussed. Ablation margins, the choice of the imaging guidance as well as characteristics of the different ablation techniques and other technical aspects are analyzed. A specific attention is then paid to the increasing role of biomarkers (in particular molecular profiling) and their role in the selection of the proper treatment for the right patient. In conclusion, in this review an up-to-date state of the art of the application of locoregional treatments on CRLM is provided, highlighting both technical aspects and the role of biomarkers, two sides of the same coin.

Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

Abstract

The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases revisited

BACKGROUND

Recent reports indicate improved survival in patients undergoing surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pump chemotherapy compared to surgery alone.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection and/or ablation of CRLM between 1996 and 2016 were included from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. Proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) and 3:1 propensity score analysis (PSA).

RESULTS

Of 349 patients included, 36 had HAI pumps placed (HAI group) and 313 did not (no-HAI group). There was no difference in primary tumor grade (p = 0.24), ECOG status (p = 0.44), tumor number (p = 0.1), tumor size (p = 0.56), margin status (p = 0.76) between the two groups. Median overall survival was 44.7months vs 37.1months for the HAI versus no-HAI group (p = 0.01). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated positive margin status (HR:2.47,p < 0.0001), HAI therapy (HR:0.56,p = 0.02), preoperative chemotherapy (HR:0.69,p = 0.02) and tumor diameter (HR:1.07,p = 0.005) as predictors of OS. In 3:1 PSA, 32 HAI subjects were matched with 87 non-HAI subjects balancing all covariates. Median OS was 42.4 months versus 35.6 months for the HAI versus no-HAI group (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of CRLM combined with HAI chemotherapy is associated with improved OS compared to surgery alone. Further study of this treatment approach is indicated.

Shanghai international consensus on diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2019)

The liver is the most common anatomical site for hematogenous metastases from colorectal cancer. Therefore effective treatment of liver metastases is one of the most challenging elements in the management of colorectal cancer. However, there is rare available clinical consensus or guideline only focusing on colorectal liver metastases. After six rounds of discussion by 195 clinical experts of the Shanghai International Consensus Expert Group on Colorectal Liver Metastases (SINCE) from 29 countries or regions, the Shanghai Consensus has been finally completed, based on current research and expert experience. The consensus emphasized the principle of multidisciplinary team, provided detailed diagnosis approaches, and guided precise local and systemic treatments. This Shanghai Consensus might be of great significance to standardized diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases all over the world.

Hepatic artery infusion pumps

The preferential blood supply from the hepatic artery to liver tumors allows for the regional delivery of chemotherapy, commonly referred to as hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy via a subcutaneous pump. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve overall survival in select patients with colorectal liver metastasis and is a promising treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. This review focuses on the technical aspects of hepatic artery infusion pump placement.

Multicentre study of perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether perioperative chemotherapy, compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone, improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) on DFS in patients with upfront resectable CLM.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who presented with up to five resectable CLM at two Japanese and two French centres in 2008-2015 were included in the study. Both French institutions favoured perioperative FOLFOX, whereas the two Japanese groups systematically preferred upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox regression multivariable models were used to adjust for confounding. The primary outcome was DFS.

RESULTS

Some 300 patients were included: 151 received perioperative chemotherapy and 149 had upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. The weighted 3-year DFS rate was 33·5 per cent after perioperative chemotherapy compared with 27·1 per cent after upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0·85, 95 per cent c.i. 0·62 to 1·16; P = 0·318). For the subgroup of 165 patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX successfully (for at least 3 months), the adjusted effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significant (HR 1·19, 0·74 to 1·90; P = 0·476). No significant effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative FOLFOX does not improve DFS in patients with resectable CLM, provided adjuvant chemotherapy is given successfully.

Initial systemic chemotherapeutic and targeted therapy strategies for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases

Introduction: The liver is the most common metastatic site in colorectal cancer with more than half the patients developing a liver metastasis either at the time of their diagnosis (synchronous) or later (metachronous). Surgical resection remains the principal curative approach that offers significant survival improvements. However, upfront surgery is only possible in about 10-20% of patients at the time of diagnosis, making the consideration of other treatment modalities essential. Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of the standard approaches for the initial management of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases. They then provide an up-to-date discussion of first-line systemic chemotherapy/targeted therapy options in the contexts of initially resectable and unresectable disease and review toxicities and complications following these options. Expert opinion: Advances in chemotherapeutic agents and biological targeted therapies have improved the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. However, there is still no 'single best approach', making further trials necessary to provide more evidence.

Network Meta-Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

OBJECTIVE

Six principal adjuvant chemotherapy treatments (ACTs) are currently available for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the optimal ACT, as evaluated by 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as well as by hepatic recurrences and adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The probability of the optimal therapeutic scheme and the mean ranking were estimated for each treatment using network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Systemic chemotherapy (SCT) had the best 2-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-1.27, 95% prediction interval [PI] = 0.17-3.56, surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] = 73) and the lowest AE rate (estimated SUCRA = 65 and predicted SUCRA = 62). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus SCT had the best 5-year OS rate (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01, 95% PI = 0.50-1.29) and the lowest hepatic recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56-5.30, 95% PI = 0.61-13.62).

CONCLUSION

Both SCT and HAI plus SCT showed superior efficacy and safety. Clinical trials in homogeneous populations with strict selection criteria are needed to compare these two ACTs.

Postoperative hepatic arterial chemotherapy in high-risk patients as adjuvant treatment after resection of colorectal liver metastases - a randomized phase II/III trial - PACHA-01 (NCT02494973)

BACKGROUND

After curative-intent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), liver recurrence occurs in more than 60% of patients, despite the administration of perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy. This risk is even higher after resection of more than three CRLM. As CRLM are mostly supplied by arterial blood flow, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapeutic agents after resection of CRLM is an attractive approach. Oxaliplatin-based HAI chemotherapy, in association with systemic fluoropyrimidines, has been shown to be safe and highly active in patients with CRLM. In a retrospective series of 98 patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence (≥4 resected CRLM), adjuvant HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic chemotherapy was feasible and significantly improved disease-free survival compared to adjuvant, 'modern' systemic chemotherapy alone.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is designed as a multicentre, randomized, phase II/III trial. The first step is a non-comparative randomized phase II trial (power, 95%; one-sided alpha risk, 10%). Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to adjuvant systemic FOLFOX (control arm) or adjuvant HAI oxaliplatin plus systemic LV5FU2 (experimental arm). A total 114 patients will need to be included. The main objective of this trial is to evaluate the potential survival benefit of adjuvant HAI with oxaliplatin after resection of at least 4 CRLM (primary endpoint: 18-month hepatic recurrence-free survival rate). We also aim to assess the feasibility of delivering at least 4 cycles of HAI (or i.v.) oxaliplatin after surgical treatment of at least 4 CRLM, the toxicity (NCI-CTC v4.0) of adjuvant HAI plus systemic chemotherapy, including HAI catheter-related complications, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, and the efficacy of adjuvant HAI on hepatic and extra-hepatic recurrence-free (survival and overall survival).

DISCUSSION

If 18-month hepatic recurrence-free survival is greater than 50% in the experimental arm, the study will be pursued in phase III, for which the primary endpoint will be 3-year recurrence-free survival rate. Patients randomized in the phase II will be included in the phase III, with an additional number of 106 patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02494973 . Trial registration date: July 10, 2015.

Ninety percent of the adverse outcomes occur in 10% of patients: can we identify the populations at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur in 3.4-6.3% after curative surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Systematic "2nd look" surgery helps overcoming the diagnostic problem but can be only proposed to selected patients. The aim of this study was to update the knowledge on risk factors of developing PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature published between 2011 and 2016 was made, searching for all clinical studies reporting the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer and factors associated with the primary tumour that were likely to influence this recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Seven new clinical studies were considered informative for risk factors and added to the 16 reviewed in 2013. Even if the level of evidence was low, data suggested rates of recurrent PM at 1 year between 54% and 71% after completely resected synchronous PM, between 62% and 71% after resection of isolated synchronous ovarian metastases, of 27% after surgery for a perforated primary tumour, of 16% after surgery for a pT4 tumour, and between 11% and 36% after surgery for a mucinous histological subtype. No new risk factor was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is poor. Situations at higher risk of recurrent PM are synchronous PM, synchronous isolated ovarian metastases, perforated primary tumour with serosa invasion and mucinous histological subtype.

Hepatic arterial infusion in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: Current and future perspectives

The technique of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) for the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer has been developed over more than 30 years. Although the indications and protocols for this technique have evolved with time, HAI is not routinely performed in clinical practice. Studies have been heterogeneous, with different regimens of intra-arterial drugs, associated or not with systemic chemotherapy, and with unconvincing outcomes. Technical difficulties for catheter placement have limited the implementation of this method in routine practice. The aim of this review is to present recent studies, highlighting technical improvements and promising combinations of oxaliplatin-based HAI with systemic treatments. HAI is being investigated in both the metastatic setting - in the first line and beyond - and in the adjuvant setting, and we will discuss its potential place in current and future patient management.

Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases initially greater than 25 mm but downsized by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased rate of local tumor progression

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valid treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM) smaller than 25 mm and unsuitable for surgical resection. Tumor size is predictive for local tumor progression (LTP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether RFA is indicated for lesions >25 mm at presentation but <25 mm after chemotherapy.

METHOD

Patients who underwent RFA for CRLM after chemotherapy (January 2004-December 2012) were reviewed. Metastases were classified according to their size. Group 1: ≤25 mm before and after chemotherapy. Group 2A: >25 mm before but ≤25 mm after chemotherapy. Group 2B: >25 mm before and after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

133 CRLM were ablated in 83 patients (median follow-up 56 months). At 1-year, the LTP rate was higher in group 2A than in group 1 (32% vs. 16%, p ≤ 0.001). The highest rate of 1-year LTP was 64% in group 2B. Time to LTP (TLTP) was shorter in group 2A than in group 1 (HR: 2.89; 95% CI [1.04-8.01]; p = 0.004). Following multivariate analysis, the group type was the only predictive factor for TLTP (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is not the optimal treatment for CRLM > 25 mm at presentation.

How and when adjuvant treatment should be intensified in stage III colorectal cancers?

The adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX) represents the standard of care in stage III colon cancer with some exceptions in old patients. Adjuvant treatment must also be discussed in high-risk stage II colon cancer. However, 40-50% of patients develop disease recurrence after curative R0 surgical resection. The liver was the most common site of recurrence followed by peritoneum. Although adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival and overall survival, 5-year overall survival remains less than 55% in stage III colon cancer. Different strategies could be adopted to escalate the standard adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients going from aggressive intravenous chemotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to adding targeted therapies or immunotherapies. We reported in this review the published and ongoing trials evaluating these treatment modalities in colon cancer.

Long-term outcomes of patients with 10 or more colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although the number of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is decreasingly considered as a contraindication to surgery, patients with 10 CLM or more are often denied liver surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome after liver surgery and to identify prognostic factors of survival in such patients.

METHODS

The study population consisted of a multicentre cohort of patients with CLM (N=12 406) operated on, with intention to resect, from January 2005-June 2013 and whose data were prospectively collected in the LiverMetSurvey registry.

RESULTS

Overall, the group ⩾10 CLM (N=529, 4.3%) experienced a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 30%. A macroscopically complete (R0/R1) resection (72.8% of patients) was associated with a 3- and 5-year OS of 61% and 39% vs 29% and 5% for R2/no resection patients (P<0.0001). At multivariate analysis, R0/R1 resection emerged as the strongest favourable factor of OS (HR 0.35 (0.26-0.48)). Other independent favourable factors were as follows: maximal tumour size <40 mm (HR 0.67 (0.49-0.92)); age <60 years (HR 0.66 (0.50-0.88)); preoperative MRI (HR 0.65 (0.47-0.89)); and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.73 (0.55-0.98)). The model showed that 5-year OS rates of 30% was possible provided R0/R1 resection associated with at least an additional favourable factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection might provide long-term survival in patients with ⩾10 CLM staged with preoperative MRI, provided R0/R1 resection followed by adjuvant therapy. A validation of these results in another cohort is needed.

New Developments in Interventional Oncology: Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Although hepatic excision is the first-line treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), few patients are candidates. Locoregional therapy (LRT) encompasses minimally invasive techniques practiced by interventional radiology. These include ablative treatments (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryosurgical ablation) and transcatheter intra-arterial therapy (hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, transarterial "bland" embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization with yttrium 90). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends LRT for unresectable CRLM refractory to chemotherapy. The following is a review of LRT in CRLM, including salient features, advantages, limitations, current roles, and future considerations.

Liver-directed therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is a significant global health issue with over 1 million cases diagnosed annually throughout the world. 15% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will have liver metastases and 60% will develop liver metastases if they have metastatic disease. Oligometastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver represents an intermediate state in the evolution of metastatic capacity that opens the opportunity for local interventions. Areas covered: The literature supports long-term survival if patients undergo liver resection of colorectal metastases. This article reviews the liver-directed therapeutic strategies available for the management of metastatic liver disease including hepatic arterial infusion therapy, radiofrequency ablation, radiation therapy and transarterial chemoembolization. Expert commentary: Great advances have been made with the use of liver directed therapies. In the USA using hepatic arterial infusions with FUDR and Decadron along with systemic therapy, 5 year survivals after liver resection have improved. In Europe with the use of HAI of Oxaliplatin, more patients have been able to get to resection and have obtained higher survival rates, even in second line therapy. New advances in ablative therapy have improved results to get all disease treated at resection for the treatment of reccurrence.

Computed Tomography Image Texture: A Noninvasive Prognostic Marker of Hepatic Recurrence After Hepatectomy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) occurs in up to 75% of patients. Preoperative prediction of hepatic recurrence may inform therapeutic strategies at the time of initial resection. Texture analysis (TA) is an established technique that quantifies pixel intensity variations (heterogeneity) on cross-sectional imaging. We hypothesized that tumoral and parenchymal changes that are predictive of overall survival (OS) and recurrence in the future liver remnant (FLR) can be detected using TA on preoperative computed tomography (CT) images.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for CRLM between 2003 and 2007 with appropriate preoperative CT scans were included (n = 198) in this retrospective study. Texture features extracted from the tumor and FLR, and clinicopathologic variables, were incorporated into a multivariable survival model.

RESULTS

Quantitative imaging features of the FLR were an independent predictor of both OS and hepatic disease-free survival (HDFS). Tumor texture showed significant association with OS. TA of the FLR allowed patient stratification into two groups, with significantly different risks of hepatic recurrence (hazard ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval 1.33-3.28; p = 0.001). Patients with homogeneous parenchyma had approximately twice the risk of hepatic recurrence (41 vs. 20%).

CONCLUSION

TA of the tumor and FLR are independently associated with OS, and TA of the FLR is independently associated with HDFS. Patients with homogeneous parenchyma had a significantly higher risk of hepatic recurrence. Preoperative TA of the liver represents a potential biomarker to identify patients at risk of liver recurrence after resection for CRLM.

Perioperative Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy Is Associated With Longer Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Analysis

Purpose To investigate whether perioperative hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy (HAI) was associated with overall survival (OS) in patients who had a complete resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods Patients who underwent a complete resection of CLM between 1992 and 2012 were included from a single-center prospectively maintained database. All patients who received HAI also received perioperative systemic chemotherapy. Propensity score analysis was used to match patients for seven known prognostic factors. Results A total of 2,368 consecutive patients underwent a complete resection of CLM, with a median follow-up of 55 months. The median OS for patients with HAI (n = 785) was 67 months versus 44 months without HAI (n = 1,583; P < .001), despite more advanced disease in the HAI group. OS at 10 years was 38.0% versus 23.8% without HAI. For patients who received modern systemic chemotherapy (n = 1,442), the median OS was 67 months with HAI and 47 months without HAI ( P < .001). The hazard ratio adjusted by propensity score demonstrated longer OS with HAI: 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.76; P < .001). A pronounced difference in median OS was found for patients with node-negative colorectal cancer (129 months with HAI v 51 months without; P < .001) and a low clinical risk score of 0 to 2 points (89 months with HAI v 53 months without; P < .001). Conclusion Patients who received HAI had a median OS of approximately 2 years longer than patients without HAI. The strong association was independent of the use of modern systemic chemotherapy and remained in propensity score analysis. Patients with node-negative primary tumors or a low clinical risk score seemed to benefit most from HAI.

Intra-arterial therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases (radioembolization excluded)

During the past 20 years, advances in systemic therapies have improved overall survival of patients with Colorectal cancer Liver metastases (CRLM) from 6 to 24 months. By reaching CRLM via their preferential arterial vascularization, hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated improvement in response rate and deepness of response. Improvement in deepness of response is potentially helpful to convert no surgical patient to surgery. Recent HAIC regimens, including HAIC-FUDR plus systemic oxaliplatin/irinotecan, or HAIC-oxaliplatin plus systemic 5FU and cetuximab yielded a 92% and 90% response rate respectively, and conversion to R0 surgery in 47% and 42% of patients, respectively. When HAIC delivered a drug ineffective through intravenous delivery, this rechallenge provided 62% response rate for HAIC. Nowadays, port-catheter implanted percutaneously by radiologists has 95% feasibility with primary patency equivalent to that of surgically implanted catheters, and secondary patency superior after radiologic revision. Retrospective studies demonstrated prolonged DFS of HAIC over IV chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting after surgery of CRLM. Drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) were developed as drug carrier and embolization platform for treatment of CRLM by chemoembolization. DEBIRI allows for a very high level of SN-38 (SN-38 is the active compound of irinotecan) and a very high rate of complete l response at pathologic studies of treated metastases. DEBIRI was compared to systemic FOLFIRI in a phase III randomized trial including 74 patients with benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival.

Significance of R1 Resection for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Effective Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The prognosis impact of positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in patients treated with modern effective chemotherapy has not been elucidated. The objective was to compare oncologic outcomes after R0 and R1 resections in the era of modern effective chemotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2010, all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for CLM were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with extrahepatic metastases, macroscopic residual tumor, treated with combined radiofrequency, or not treated with chemotherapy were excluded. Survival and recurrence after R0 (tumor-free margin >0 mm) and R1 resections were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 466 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, 191 were eligible. Of them, 164 (86 %) received preoperative chemotherapy and 105 (55 %) received postoperative chemotherapy. R1 resection (10 %) was comparable in patients treated or not by preoperative chemotherapy. R1 status was associated with more intrahepatic recurrences. Overall survival (OS) (44 vs. 61 %; p = 0.047) and disease-free survival (DFS) (8 vs. 26 %; p = 0.082) were lower in patients after R1 compared to R0 resection (32 months of median follow-up). Preoperative chemotherapy and major hepatectomy were prognostic factors of survival, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was a protective factor from recurrences. In patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy, OS and DFS were similar between R1 and R0 resections (40 vs. 55 %, p = 0.104 and 9 vs. 22 %, p = 0.174, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the era of modern effective chemotherapy, R1 resection leads to more intrahepatic recurrences but did not affect OS in selected patient responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy protects from recurrences whatever the margin resection status.

Recent Advances in Chemotherapy and Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is the most common site of metastases for colorectal cancer, and combined resection with systemic chemotherapy is the most effective strategy for survival. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary on four hot topics related to chemotherapy and surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLM), namely: (1) chemotherapy-related liver injuries: prediction and impact, (2) surgery for initially unresectable CLM, (3) the emerging role of RAS mutations, and (4) the role of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC).

SUMMARY AND KEY MESSAGES

(1) The use of chemotherapy before liver resection for CLM leads to drug-specific hepatic toxicity, which negatively impacts posthepatectomy outcomes. (2) Curative liver resection of initially unresectable CLM following conversion chemotherapy should be attempted whenever possible, provided that a safe future liver remnant volume is achieved. (3) For CLM, RAS mutation status is needed to guide the use of targeted chemotherapy with anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents, and is a major prognostic factor that may contribute to optimize surgical strategy. (4) HAIC agents increase the rate of objective response and the rate of complete pathological response.

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastasis in eleven questions and answers

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is the most frequent indication for liver resection in many centers. Recent improvements in oncology, surgery, interventional radiology, pathology and anesthesiology allow curative treatment in a larger proportion of patients with CRLM. Areas covered: We illustrate the various aspects of the management of CRLM through 11 questions that summarize the topic, from the current obtained survival to future perspectives such as transplantation. The limits of a curative treatment are also presented from different angles, such as the benefits of pathology, the surgical options for extreme resections, the available chemotherapies and their efficacy, or the non-surgical ablative treatments. Expert commentary: Given the increasing therapeutic possibilities, we strengthen the importance to analyze the situation of each patient with CRLM in a dedicated multidisciplinary team, in order to offer the best individualized treatment combination.

Treatment sequence of synchronously (liver) metastasized colon cancer

No standards for staging, systemic therapy or the timing of an operation are defined for patients newly diagnosed with synchronous metastases and a primary in the colon. An expert group of radiologists, medical, radiation and surgical oncologists therefore came together to discuss staging and treatment sequence for these patients and came up with a recommendation based on current evidence of potential therapeutic options. The discussion was organized to debate recommendations centred on 5 topics and therefore the position paper is built upon these titles and their subtitles.

Transarterial Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Until recently, hepatic arterial therapies (HAT) had been used for colorectal liver metastases after failure of first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapies. HAT has gained greater acceptance in patients with liver-dominant colorectal metastases after failure of surgery or systemic chemotherapy. The current data demonstrate that HAT is a safe and effective option for preoperative downsizing, optimizing the time to surgery, limiting non-tumor-bearing liver toxicity, and improving overall survival after surgery in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases. The aim of this review is to present the current data for HAT in liver-only and liver-dominant colorectal liver metastases.

Is hepatectomy justified for patients with RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases? An analysis of 524 patients undergoing curative liver resection

BACKGROUND

RAS mutations are associated with limited overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Our aim was to determine criteria for considering hepatectomy for patients with RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

Of 1,163 patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases during 2005-2014, all patients operated on with curative intent who had known RAS mutation status were included. Factors associated with overall survival were determined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 524 patients met the inclusion criteria; 212 (40%) had mutated RAS. Mutations were located on codon 12 in 128 patients (60%) and codon 13 in 29 (14%). At median follow-up of 38 months, median overall survival was 72.6 months for wild-type RAS and 50.9 months for mutated RAS (P < .001). Median overall survival for patients with codon 12 and 13 mutations was 51.9 and 50.9 months, respectively (P = .839), significantly worse than for patients with wild-type RAS (P = .005, and P = .038 for codon 12 and 13, respectively). For patients with RAS mutation, factors associated independently with worse overall survival were node-positive primary tumor, tumor >3 cm, and >7 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Major and 2-stage hepatectomy were not associated independently with overall survival. Median overall survival was 57, 41, and 21.5 months for patients with 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. There were no 4-year survivors in the highest-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with multiple risk factors had poor overall survival after curative resection of RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases. For such patients, hepatectomy may be ill advised, and alternative therapies or further systemic therapy should be considered.

Liver resection for metastases from colorectal cancer in very elderly patients: New surgical horizons

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may develop liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the best treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) according to resectability criteria, with a long-term survival of 25% up to 41% after 5 years. Advanced age is associated with a higher incidence and co-morbidity, particularly cardiovascular disease, as well as deteriorating physiological reserves. The aim of this study was to analyse the overall and disease-free survival for patients with CRLM according to their chronological age.

METHODS

Patients with CRLM were enrolled in the study. Data on gender, age, co-morbidity, metastasis characteristics (number, size and total metastatic volume (TMV)), use of perioperative chemotherapy and operative and post-operative complications were collected. Then, according to recent World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, the patients were grouped by age. Statistical analysis was performed using the software R (ver. 2.14.1).

RESULTS

Hepatic resection was performed in 149 patients (21 patients in the very elderly group, 79 in the elderly group and 49 in the younger group). The three groups were comparable in terms of operative duration, transfusion rate, length of high-dependency unit (HDU) stay and post-operative hospital stay. The very elderly group showed a non-significant increase in post-operative morbidity. The 30-day and 60-day/inpatient mortality rates increased with age without any significant statistically difference between the three groups (very elderly group 4.8% and 4.8%; elderly group: 2.5% and 3.8%; and younger group 0% and 2%). At 5 years, the overall survival was 28.6% for very elderly patients (≥75 years), 33.3% for elderly patients (≥65 to <75 years) and 43.5% for younger patients (≤65 years). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was similar across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection for CRLM in carefully selected patients above the age of 75 can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates, similar to those in younger patients. Moreover, the severity of CRLM in elderly patients is proven to be lesser than in younger patients. Thus, we can conclude that advanced chronological age cannot be considered a contraindication to hepatic resection for CRLM.

Hepatic Artery Infusional Chemotherapy

Hepatic artery infusion (HAI) therapy is a well-studied and viable regional therapy for patients with hepatic metastases. Implantable pump devices may be safely placed intraarterially with minimal morbidity and HAI treatments can be used as an adjunct to systemic therapy. Future trials may address sequencing of regional and systemic therapies. However, HAI is not without complications and requires close monitoring and attention to detail but can offer reasonable control of liver tumor burden when managed jointly between medical and surgical oncologists. Herein we describe the technical aspects of HAI pump placement and review pertinent studies in primary and secondary liver tumors.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancer metastases: Literature review and meta-analysis

Surgical resection is the only option of cure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the risk of recurrence within 18 mo after metastasectomy is around 75% and the liver is the most frequent site of relapse. The current international guidelines recommend an adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of CRC metastases despite the lower level of evidence (based on the quality of studies in this setting). However, there is still no standard treatment and the effective role of an adjuvant therapy remains controversial. The aim of this review is to report the state-of-art of systemic chemotherapy and regional chemotherapy with hepatic arterial infusion in the management of patients after resection of metastases from CRC, with a literature review and meta-analysis of the relevant randomized controlled trials.

Hepatic resection, hepatic arterial infusion pump therapy, and genetic biomarkers in the management of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Fortunately, improvements have been made in the care of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Effective management of CRLM requires a multidisciplinary approach that is tailored to individuals in order to achieve long-term survival, and cure. Resection and systemic chemotherapy provides benefit in selected individuals. An adjunct to resection and/or systemic chemotherapy is the use of hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) therapy. Many studies show HAIP provides benefit for select patients with CRLM. Added to the crucible of a multidisciplinary approach to managing CRLM is the ever growing understanding of tumor biology and genetic profiling. In this review, we discuss the outcomes of resection, systemic therapies and HAIP therapy for CRLM. We also discuss the impact of recent advances in genetic profiling and mutational analysis, namely mutation of KRAS and BRAF, for this disease.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to reappraise the role of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion for colorectal cancer liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

The potential benefit of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion remains unknown for patients with colorectal liver metastases after radical hepatic resection. The principle aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion.

METHODS

Eligible trials were identified from Embase, PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane library since their inception to June 1, 2014. Patients with colorectal liver metastases, who underwent radical hepatic resection and received adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion, were enrolled. The study outcomes included 5-year disease-free and overall survival rate, respectively. Hazard ratio with a 95 % confidence interval was used to measure the pooled effect according to a random effects model or fixed effects model, depending on the heterogeneity between the included studies. The statistical heterogeneity between trials was detected by I (2) test. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.

RESULTS

A total of nine studies containing 1057 patients were included. The comparison indicated that the overall pooled hazard ratio for 5-year overall survival was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.56-0.99, p = 0.048). The hazard ratio for 5-year disease-free survival rate was 0.61 (95 % CI: 0.48-0.79, p = 0.001). When compared with systemic chemotherapy alone, adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy also improved the long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion improved the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rate, respectively. It should be recommended for patients with a high risk of recurrence, but these findings require prospective confirmation.

Hepatic arterial infusional chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) receive their blood supply predominantly through the hepatic artery. Intra-arterial drug delivery can optimize the dose and time exposure of chemotherapy to tumor cells while limiting systemic toxicity. Chemotherapy is most commonly administered through a catheter surgically placed in the gastroduodenal artery and connected to a subcutaneous pump. Due to its pharmacokinetics features, floxuridine is the most commonly used drug in the USA with hepatic arterial infusional (HAI) chemotherapy. To date, many clinical trials have shown the positive impact of HAI in the management of CRLM. Hence, in unresectable patients, HAI is associated with high response rates and commonly enables subsequent resection in both chemonaive and previously treated patients. Outcomes in patients converted to complete resection are similar to patients who present with initially resectable disease. In the adjuvant setting, HAI with floxuridine improves survival as well as hepatic and overall disease-free survival after complete resection of CRLM, as compared with 5-FU alone, in three of four randomized studies. To date, no trials have compared HAI combined with modern chemotherapy alone to modern chemotherapy alone in the adjuvant setting.

Prognostic similarities and differences in optimally resected liver metastases and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancers

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare survival in patients operated for colorectal liver metastases (LM) with that in patients optimally resected for peritoneal metastases (PM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study concerns 287 patients with LM and 119 patients with PM treated with surgery plus chemotherapy between 1993 and 2009, excluding patients presenting both LM and PM.

RESULTS

Mortality (respectively, 2.7% and 4.2%), morbidity (respectively, 11% and 17%), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (respectively, 38.5% and 36.5%) were not statistically different between the LM group and the PM group. Multivariate analysis showed that the extent of the disease was the main prognostic factor, which led us to divide the population into 5 subgroups. The best 5-year OS rate (72.4%) was obtained in patients with minimal peritoneal disease [peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤5]. OS was similar for the patients with less than 10 LM and those with a PCI between 6 and 15 (respectively, 39.4% and 38.7%). Five-year OS was lower in patients with more than 10 LM (18.1%), and dramatically low for patients with a PCI > 15 (11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the prognostic impact of the tumor burden in metastatic colorectal disease. In selected patients, similar survival rates can be obtained after optimal treatment of LM and PM. As the role of optimal surgical resection of LM is widely accepted, our results confirm that an optimal attitude should also be adopted to treat PM with a PCI < 16, particularly in patients with very low PCI (<5) where survival could be better than LM.