Impact of Histologically Confirmed Lymph Node Metastases on Patient Survival After Surgical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Report of a Japanese Nationwide Survey

Prognostic factors and clinical significance of preoperative systemic therapy in patients with borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A JSHBPS project study 2023, Part 2

PURPOSE

To explore factors influencing the prognosis in patients with borderline-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (BR-HCC) undergoing surgery.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with BR-HCC according to the definition in the Expert Consensus Statement 2023 were collected from board-certified HPB training centers and analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

Data of a total of 1509 patients with BR-HCC (BR1, n = 718 and BR2, n = 791) who underwent surgery were collected. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate (DSS) and 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) were determined as 40.8% and 19.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the oncological resectability category (i.e., BR2 vs. BR1) as a significant prognostic factor, and also the number of criteria fulfilled for classification into BR2 disease as being predictive of the DSS (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: one factor: 1.32 [1.13-1.54]; two to three factors: 1.51 [1.15-1.96]). Preceding systemic therapy was significantly correlated with a longer DSS (HR, 0.41: 95% CI, 0.18-0.91) and RFS (HR, 0.80: 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) in the patients with BR1 disease, while its clinical significance was unclear in the patients with BR2 disease.

CONCLUSION

Multicenter data confirm the clinical relevance of the oncological resectability category and the potential advantage of preceding systemic therapy in a specific group of BR-HCC.

The Role of Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Lymphadenectomy in the operative management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, with no recommendation for routine practice. Our study aimed to assess the effects of lymphadenectomy in addition to hepatic resection (HR) compared to HR alone for adults with HCC. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines until March 2023, searching and selecting the relevant literature comparing lymph node dissection or sampling, combined with HR, and with no lymph node removal. Critical appraisal of the included studies was performed using the ROBINS-I tool. Fixed- or random-effect meta-analysis models were carried out, and inter-studies were assessed for heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen studies were selected during the screening process. Data from eight studies containing 32,041 HCC patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. In total, 12,694 patients underwent lymph node dissection (LND), either selectively for preoperatively diagnosed or intraoperatively suspected lymph node metastasis (LNM) or unselectively (i.e., regardless of suspected LNM). According to LN status, 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality rates were higher in the LNM group with respect to both clinically negative LN (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.52-4.21; p < 0.001; OR 3.79, 95% CI 2.74-5.24; p < 0.001; OR 3.92, 95% CI 2.61-5.88; p < 0.001) and proven LN0 (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.0-3.04; p = 0.05; OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.79-4.63; p < 0.001; OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.33-4.84; p < 0.001). Moreover, the summary estimates of two controlled trials showed no significant difference in overall survival between LND groups and those without LND for negative LN patients. Conclusions: Lymph node dissection does not appear to improve overall survival, according to the available literature; thus, this does not support its routine adoption as part of standard liver resection for HCC. A case-by-case decision remains advisable.

Oncological Resectability Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies: The Japan Liver Cancer Association and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement 2023

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to debates about the feasibility of combination therapies, such as systemic therapy combined with surgery or transarterial chemoembolization, for patients with advanced HCC. However, a lack of consensus on the oncological resectability criteria has hindered discussions of "conversion therapy" and the optimal management in patients with HCC. To address this issue, the Japan Liver Cancer Association (JLCA) and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) established a working group and discussed the concept of borderline resectable HCC. Herein, we present a consensus statement from this expert panel on the resectability criteria for HCC from the oncological standpoint under the assumption of technically and liver-functionally resectable situations. The criteria for oncological resectability in HCC are classified into three grades: resectable, representing an oncological status for which surgery alone may be expected to offer clearly better survival outcomes as compared with other treatments; borderline resectable 1, representing an oncological status for which surgical intervention as a part of multidisciplinary treatment may be expected to offer survival benefit; and borderline resectable 2, representing an oncological status for which the efficacy of surgery is uncertain and the indication for surgery should be determined carefully under the standard multidisciplinary treatment. These criteria aim to provide a common language for discussing and analyzing the treatment strategies for advanced HCC. It is also expected that these criteria will be optimized, modified, and updated based on further advancements in systemic therapies and future validation studies.

Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2), and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in population 1. In population 2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, p = 0.023) and curative-intent conversion surgery (BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%, p = 0.056) after lenvatinib therapy, and was also predictive of the OS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.38 for BR2 [vs. BR1]) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.17 for BR2 [vs. BR1]).

CONCLUSION

The resectability classification based on the novel oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.

Questionnaire survey of Japanese board-certified expert hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons and instructors on the surgical indications for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent advancements in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) necessitate the establishment of resectability criteria for advanced HCC.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey sought to clarify the perspectives of Japanese expert hepatobiliary surgeons regarding surgical indications for HCC. Thirty-one questions were used to determine when surgery is strongly recommended (resectable: R) or not recommended (unresectable: UR).

RESULTS

A total of 351 responses were obtained. While 64.7% of the respondents considered solitary tumors as being R, irrespective of size, opinions diverged on the upper limit of the number of tumors/tumor size for R: (1) up to three nodules with no size limit (27.9%), (2) up to three nodules ≤5 cm in diameter each (21.4%) and (3) up to three nodules ≤3 cm in diameter each (19.4%). Vp1, Vp2, Vp3, and Vp4 were considered as being R by 90.9%, 70.7%, 39.0%, and 8.0% of respondents, respectively. Half of the respondents indicated they would consider resection even for cases with extrahepatic spread under limited conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The current views of Japanese expert surgeons on the resectability criteria for HCC were clarified for the first time. The findings could serve as a basis for preparing expert consensus statements on the resectability criteria for HCC.

Long-term outcomes and salvageability in patients undergoing liver resection for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUNDS

The prognosis of intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection should be comprehensively analyzed due to the high incidence of tumor recurrence and the availability of salvage therapy. This study evaluated the long-term outcome and salvageability in these patients after liver resection.

METHODS

Data from consecutive patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent initial liver resection from 2000 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Analyses were performed in the setting of the initial liver resection and the recurrence(s). Active salvage therapy for recurrence was defined as the implementation of each therapy with curative intent-repeat surgery, ablative therapy, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Among the 1,013 liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma, a total of 270 patients were eligible for this study (intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 134; advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 136). The 5-year overall survival rates for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma were 49.7% and 36.8%, respectively; meanwhile, the actual recurrence rates excluding patients who died without recurrence were 94.7% and 90.7%, respectively. Active salvage therapy was performed in 43 (39.8%) patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma and 25 (23.4%) patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall survival after initial liver resection, first active salvage therapy, and second/more active salvage therapy were comparable in both stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that although liver resection alone may not yield remission in most patients with intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, active salvage therapy can potentially prolong survival. Further study to identify approaches to decrease recurrence rates and increase salvageability for these patients would be warranted.

Report of the 23rd nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan (2014-2015)

For the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 20 889 newly registered patients and 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 516 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 23rd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 22nd survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh grade, or albumin-bilirubin grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer in the world.

Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Extrahepatic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

The most common sites of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the lungs, intra-abdominal lymph nodes, bones, and adrenal glands, in that order. Although systemic therapies are a common treatment for patients with extrahepatic metastases, local ablative therapies for the extrahepatic metastatic lesions can be performed in selected patients. In this article, the literature on image-guided thermal ablation for metastasis to each organ was reviewed to summarize the current evidence. Radiofrequency ablation was the most commonly evaluated technique, and microwave ablation, cryoablation, and percutaneous ethanol injection were also utilized. The local control rate of thermal ablation therapy was relatively favorable, at approximately 70-90% in various organs. The survival outcomes varied among the studies, and several studies reported that the absence of viable intrahepatic lesions was associated with improved survival rates. Since only retrospective data from relatively small studies has been available thus far, more robust studies with prospective designs and larger cohorts are desired to prove the usefulness of thermal ablation for extrahepatic metastases from HCC.

Prognostic Role of the Intrahepatic Lymphatic System in Liver Cancer

Although several prognosticators, such as lymph node metastasis (LNM), were reported for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the prognostic impact of intrahepatic lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) in liver cancer has rarely been reported. We sought to clarify the prognostic impact of intrahepatic lymphatic system involvement in liver cancer. We systematically reviewed retrospective studies that described LVI and clinical outcomes of liver cancer and also included studies that investigated tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis. We conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan software (version 5.4.1; Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The prognostic impact of intrahepatic LVI in HCC was not reported previously. However, tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis reportedly correlates with prognosis after HCC resection. The prognostic impact of intrahepatic LVI was reported severally for ICC and a meta-analysis showed that overall survival was poorer in patients with positive LVI than with negative LVI after resection of ICC. Lymphangiogenesis was also reported to predict unfavorable prognosis in ICC. Regarding colorectal liver metastases, LVI was identified as a poor prognosticator in a meta-analysis. A few reports showed correlations between LVI/lymphangiogenesis and LNM in liver cancer. LVI and lymphangiogenesis showed worse prognostic impacts for liver cancer than their absence, but further study is needed.

The LIver SEntinel LYmph-node (LISELY) study: A prospective intraoperative real time evaluation of liver lymphatic drainage and sentinel lymph-node using near-infrared (NIR) imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG)

Near-infrared (NIR) imaging with Indocyanine green (ICG) has been recently proposed for the sentinel lymph node (SLN) and lymphatic out-flow detection in several tumors. Nowadays its application in primary and secondary liver (LCs) and biliary cancers (BTCs) remains uninvestigated. A proof-of-concept prospective observational study including 18 patients underwent surgery for LCs and BTCs from September 2021 to November 2021 was carried out. The intraoperative NIR imaging with ICG was detected at predefined temporary intervals in order to identify the main lymphatic out-flow and the SLN. In 14 patients (77.8%) the lymphatic outflow pathway was visualized with a median time of 3 min after ICG injection (IQR 3-10). The SLN was detected and confirmed at the histological examination in 12 patients (66.7%). Intraoperative NIR imaging with ICG is a safe and feasible method to identify the lymphatic out-flow and SLN in LCs and BTCs.

Early extrahepatic recurrence as a pivotal factor for survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection: A 15-year observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is one of the most widely used modalities for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Early extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) of HCC after surgical resection is considered to be closely associated with poor prognosis. However, data regarding risk factors and survival outcomes of early EHR after surgical resection remain scarce.

AIM

To investigate the clinical features and risk factors of early EHR and elucidate its association with survival outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2019, we enrolled treatment-naïve patients who were ≥ 18 years and underwent surgical resection for HCC in two tertiary academic centers. After excluding patients with tumor types other than HCC and/or ineligible data, this retrospective study finally included 779 patients. Surgical resection of HCC was performed according to the physicians' decisions and the EHR was diagnosed based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and pathologic confirmation was performed in selected patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the variables associated with EHR.

RESULTS

Early EHR within 2 years after surgery was diagnosed in 9.5% of patients during a median follow-up period of 4.4 years. The recurrence-free survival period was 5.2 mo, and the median time to EHR was 8.8 mo in patients with early EHR. In 52.7% of patients with early EHR, EHR occurred as the first recurrence of HCC after surgical resection. On multivariate analysis, serum albumin < 4.0 g/dL, serum alkaline phosphatase > 100 U/L, surgical margin involvement, venous and/or lymphatic involvement, satellite nodules, tumor necrosis detected by pathology, tumor size ≥ 7 cm, and macrovascular invasion were determined as risk factors associated with early EHR. After sub-categorizing the patients according to the number of risk factors, the rates of both EHR and survival showed a significant correlation with the risk of early EHR. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that early EHR was associated with substantially worse survival outcomes (Hazard ratio, 6.77; 95% confidence interval, 4.81-9.52; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Early EHR significantly deteriorates the survival of patients with HCC, and our identified risk factors may predict the clinical outcomes and aid in postoperative strategies for improving survival.

Current status of primary liver cancer and decompensated cirrhosis in Japan: launch of a nationwide registry for advanced liver diseases (REAL)

BACKGROUND

We developed a nationwide database that stores data of patients with primary liver cancer (PLC) and decompensated cirrhosis (DC) on an admission basis.

METHODS

A database was constructed using the National Clinical Database, a nationwide registry platform for various diseases in Japan. Mutual data exchange was possible with the Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The stored data on the admission of patients with PLC, DC, or both, included treatment details as well as patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 37,705 admissions (29,489 PLC, 10,077 DC, and 1862 for both) in 21,376 patients from 224 hospitals were analyzed. The proportions of patients with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and non-viral etiology were 11.9%, 36.2%, and 42.6%, respectively, in PLC, and 7.5%, 23.8%, and 55.0%, respectively, in DC. The mean ages (± standard deviation) on admission with PLC and DC were 73 ± 10 and 68 ± 13 years, respectively. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage for PLC was 0, A, B, C, and D in 22.0%, 17.1%, 29.6%, 15.1%, and 5.1%, respectively. Treatment modalities for PLC were resection, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and systemic therapy in 18.4%, 22.8%, 33.7%, and 11.4%, respectively. A vasopressin receptor V2 antagonist was used in 38.2% in addition to conventionally used loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists for DC.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of treatment options for PLC on admission differed from that of the initial treatment. Newly introduced drugs are widely used in patients with DC.

Development and Validation of a Novel Model to Predict Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

The evaluation of the nodal status of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a classic but controversial topic. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM), explore the role of lymph node dissection (LND), and develop and validate a novel model to predict LNM in patients with HCC, not other specified (NOS).

Methods

The study cohort was taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The annual percent change (APC) was calculated using the Joinpoint regression. Survival analyses adopted the competing risk model. The nomogram was constructed based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm and validated by calibration curves. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was obtained to compare prognostic performance. Decision curve and clinical impact curve analyses were introduced to examine the clinical value of the models.

Results

A total of 8,829 patients were finally enrolled in this study, and 1,346 (15.2%) patients received LND. The LND rate showed no noticeable fluctuation in the last decade, with an APC of 0.5% (P=0.593). LNM was identified in 56 (4.2%) patients and confirmed an independent prognostic factor of HCC patients (P=0.005). There were 2,497 lymph nodes retrieved, and 93 (3.7%) of them were positive. After propensity score matching, LND indicated no direct oncologic benefit and did not worsen competing risks. Moreover, an increased number of lymph nodes retrieved could not improve prognoses. 1,346 patients with LND were further randomly divided into the training and validation sets with the ratio of 1:1. Race, tumor size, clinical T stage, extrahepatic bile duct invasion, and tumor grade were independent risk factors for LNM. The constructed model was well calibrated and showed good discrimination power and net benefits in clinical practice.

Conclusion

LNM is an independent prognostic factor in HCC, but routine LND seems to be unnecessary in HCC patients. The constructed model could predict the presence of LNM in HCC patients with good performance, which is meaningful to patient stratification and individual treatment strategies optimization.

Report of the 22nd nationwide follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan (2012-2013)

In the 22nd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 21 155 newly registered patients and 43 041 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 538 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 22nd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathologic diagnosis, recurrence status and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 21st survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, more patients with non-B non-C HCC, smaller tumor diameter and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2002 and 2013 whose final outcome was survival or death. Median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter or Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2013 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer worldwide.

Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence navigation facilitates complete removal of lymph node metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye that selectively accumulates in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as in extrahepatic metastases of HCC. Reported here is a case of metachronous lymph node (LN) metastases from HCC that were resected using ICG fluorescence navigation. A man in his 70s was referred to this department for suspected LN metastasis from HCC. Computed tomography revealed an enlarged suprapancreatic LN. After a laparotomy, an ICG fluorescence imaging system intraoperatively revealed strong fluorescence of this LN, which was then easily resected. An examination after the removal of the LN revealed fluorescence from the adjacent lymphatic tissue as well, so an additional resection was performed. Pathologically, both LNs were confirmed to be metastases from HCC. In this case, some lymphatic tissue metastases from HCC could not be identified prior to surgery, but intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence navigation facilitated their complete removal.

Treatment patterns and medical costs after hepatectomy in real-world practice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan

AIM

To examine the treatment patterns and medical costs in real-world practice among patients who received hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent hepatectomy as an initial therapy for primary HCC were extracted from a Japanese medical claims database from April 2008 to December 2019. The types of additional treatments for recurrent HCC and medical costs for up to 3 years from the first hepatectomy were analyzed. The average cumulative cost per patient starting on the date of the first hepatectomy was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier sample-average method.

RESULTS

Data from 2 342 patients (median age, 71 years) were analyzed. Overall, 35.6% of patients received at least one HCC treatment within 3 years of the first hepatectomy. The total average cumulative 3-years medical cost was JPY 4 993 300 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4 804 100 to 5 220 500). Surgical procedures were the most costly components in the first month after hepatectomy, whereas the costs of drugs, which mainly included antiviral and antineoplastic medications, increased thereafter. Patients with advanced stage HCC, hepatitis C, or a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index at hepatectomy, or those who required additional treatment, especially with antineoplastic drugs for recurrent HCC, incurred higher medical costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HCC after hepatectomy experienced a large economic burden, which was more serious for those with advanced stage HCC, higher comorbidities, and hepatitis at baseline and for patients treated with antineoplastic drugs. A treatment selection that considers its medical cost burden would help to reduce some of these economic burdens.

Report of the 21st Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan (2010-2011)

In the 21st Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 22,134 new patients and 41,956 previously followed patients were compiled from 546 institutions over a 2-year period from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 21st survey were cause of death, medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 20th survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy and with radiofrequency ablation. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 1998 and 2011 whose final outcome was survival or death (excluding unknown). Cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, and Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, local ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2011 into four time-period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer.

Prognostic significance of systemic inflammation score in patients who undergo hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Systemic inflammation score (SIS) is a novel prognostic score (0, 1, or 2) for various cancers, based on preoperative serum albumin level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR); modified SIS (mSIS) uses a different LMR cutoff value and was thought to be a more accurate predictor for cancer prognosis. Here, we assessed the prognostic value of SIS and mSIS in patients who receive hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated SIS and mSIS of 314 patients after hepatic resection for HCC, against their clinicopathological factors and outcomes, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis over time.

RESULTS

Among patients with preoperative SIS 2, significantly more HCC specimens were poorly differentiated (P = 0.0281), larger (P = 0.0006), and had more microscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.0136) than the SIS 0-1 group; the mSIS 2 group also had significantly larger tumors (P = 0.0039) than the mSIS 0-1 group. In ROC analysis, SIS was a better predictor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than mSIS. The SIS 2 group had shorter OS (P = 0.0015) and RFS (P = 0.0065) than other patients. In multivariate analysis, SIS 2 was an independent risk factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, P = 0.0497) and RFS (HR 1.58, P = 0.0053).

CONCLUSION

SIS is superior to mSIS in predicting prognosis of patients with HCC. mSIS is not a great predictor of prognosis in resected HCC.

Analysis of Patient Outcome after Non-curative Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Nationwide Survey Data in Japan

BACKGROUND

Non-curative (debulking) hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is occasionally applied for selected cases with bulky tumors or for oncologic emergency cases; however, the clinical usefulness of this procedure has not yet been fully evaluated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the patient outcomes of non-curative hepatic resections for HCC using data from bi-annual nationwide surveys conducted in Japan.

METHOD

Data of 1084 non-curative hepatic resections for HCC were collected. The patient outcomes were compared with those of curative resections, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

RESULTS

Patient survival after the non-curative resection was poorer than that after curative resection (P < 0.001) and was especially dismal in cases with extrahepatic tumor spread (lymph node metastasis, peritoneal seeding, or distant metastasis). As compared to cases receiving TACE without surgery, non-curative resections for multiple intrahepatic tumors were applied to cases with advanced tumors with good liver functional reserve. The survival outcomes were significantly more favorable in the TACE group, but the results became similar after propensity score matching of the patients. The survival outcome of patients receiving non-curative resections was better than that of cases treated by HAIC, with median survival times of 26.0 months and 10.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The indications for non-curative hepatic resection in patients with HCC should be judged cautiously, especially in patients with extrahepatic tumor spread. This treatment approach may be beneficial for selected patients with intermediate- or advanced-stage HCC limited in liver and with good liver functional reserve.

Favorable outcomes of surgical resection for extrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Repeat resection for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is effective for the long-term survival of patients; however, little is known about the surgical outcomes of extrahepatic nodules. The aim of this study is to investigate whether resection can contribute to the survival of patients with extrahepatic recurrent HCC.

METHODS

Under the conditions that intrahepatic recurrent HCC was absent or controlled by locoregional therapies, patients who had resectable extrahepatic recurrent HCC in the lymph nodes, adrenal gland, peritoneum, lung, or brain were included in this study. The survival of patients who did (Surgical group) and did not (Non-surgical group, underwent other therapies) undergo resection for extrahepatic recurrent HCC was compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight and 26 patients were included in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively. No patient had severe postoperative complications. After a median follow-up of 1.2 (range, 0.2-8.8) years, the median cumulative incidence of extrahepatic recurrent HCC was 1.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3.5) in the Surgical group. The median overall survival was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.5-8.8) and 1.1 (0.8-2.3) years in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year rates of survival were 60.5% and 9.1% in the Surgical and Non-surgical groups, respectively. Surgical resection, α-fetoprotein, disease-free interval, and metastasis at the adrenal gland were the independent factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the favorable surgical outcomes, resection should be considered as one of the therapeutic choices for patients with extrahepatic recurrent HCC if intrahepatic recurrent HCC can be controlled by locoregional therapies.

Clinical Significance of Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Extrahepatic Metastases

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastases who can undergo hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC with extrahepatic metastases, including lymph node and/or distant metastases were recruited for this study.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients had lymph node metastasis only, 16 had distant metastasis only, and 2 had both metastasis types during preoperative diagnosis. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of all patients was 17.9%, and the median survival time (MST) was 11.8 months. Univariate analysis revealed that intrahepatic maximal tumor size, intrahepatic tumor number, and intrahepatic tumor control after hepatectomy were significant factors influencing OS (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that independent risk factors for OS were intrahepatic maximal tumor size and intrahepatic tumor number (p < 0.05). The MST and 3-year OS rate of patients with maximal tumor size <100 mm and intrahepatic tumor number ≤2 were 39.0 months and 51.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy is not recommended for HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis with ≥3 intrahepatic tumors, even when all intrahepatic tumors can be eliminated via hepatectomy. Aggressive surgery may be justified for HCC patients with ≤2 intrahepatic tumors and maximal tumor size <100 mm, irrespective of vascular invasion.

Sorafenib treatment has the potential to downstage advanced hepatocellular carcinoma before liver resection

Sorafenib is acknowledged as the standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but in the clinical practice the treatment of these patients is extremely complex and needs to be personalized. New evidence suggests that surgical resection-based multimodal treatments may improve outcome in these patients. There is no strong evidence supporting the ability of sorafenib in downstage HCC before surgery. We presented a case of a 53-year-old man with well-compensated HCV-cirrhosis complicated with HCC and neoplastic portal vein thrombosis. The patient was treated initially with sorafenib with optimal radiological and serological response and subsequently with liver resection. Pathological examination showed necrotic portal thrombosis and massive necrosis of a metastatic regional node confirming radiological evidence. This finding suggests that sorafenib exhibits a potential to downstage advanced HCC which is not irrelevant. A possible combination of different modalities has to be considered in the view of a personalized medicine.

Report of the 20th Nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan

In the 20th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 21 075 new patients and 40 769 previously followed patients were compiled from 544 institutions over a 2-year period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2009. Compared with the previous 19th survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, included more female patients, included more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameters and more frequently received radiofrequency ablation as local ablation therapy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and by background characteristics for patients newly registered between 1998 and 2009 whose final outcome was survival or death. Cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, and Child-Pugh grade) and by treatment types (hepatectomy, local ablation therapy, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization). Cumulative survival rates and median overall survival in patients treated by resection, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and local ablation therapy were calculated. The same values were also calculated by the registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2009 into four time period groups . The results of the analysis show that the prognosis of HCC is improving dramatically. It is expected that the data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey will contribute to advancing clinical research, including the design of clinical trials, as well as the treatment strategy of primary liver cancer in the clinical practice setting.

Integrated Nomograms for Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion and Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present work is to develop and validate accurate preoperative nomograms to predict microvascular invasion (MVI) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in hepatocellular carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 268 patients with resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were divided into a training set (n = 180), in an earlier period, and a validation set (n = 88), thereafter. Risk factors for MVI and LNM were assessed based on logistic regression. Blood signatures were established using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm. Nomograms were constructed by combining risk factors and blood signatures. Performance was evaluated using the training set and validated using the validation set. The clinical values of the nomograms were measured by decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The risk factors for MVI were hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA loading, portal hypertension, Barcelona liver clinic (BCLC) stage, and three computerized tomography (CT) imaging features, namely tumor number, size, and encapsulation, while only BCLC stage, Child-Pugh classification, and tumor encapsulation were associated with LNM. The nomogram incorporating both risk factors and blood signatures achieved better performance in predicting MVI in the training and validation sets (C-indexes of 0.828 and 0.804) than the LNM nomogram (C-indexes of 0.765 and 0.717). Calibration curves also demonstrated a good fit. The decision curves indicate significant clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel validated nomograms for HCC patients presented herein are noninvasive preoperative tools that can effectively predict the individualized risk of MVI and LNM, and this predictive power can aid doctors in explaining the illness for patient counseling.

Prognostic assessment using a new substaging system for Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide study

AIM & BACKGROUND

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (Barcelona clinic liver cancer [BCLC] stage C) needs subclassification to more accurately predict survival. This study aims to establish a substaging system of BCLC stage C HCC patients for accurate prognosis.

METHODS

Data from 564 patients with newly diagnosed BCLC stage C HCC from three tertiary-care hospitals affiliated with the Korea University (training set) were assessed retrospectively. Variables affecting overall survival (OS) were analysed, and patients were substaged according to the number of prognostic factors they fulfilled. The substaging system was validated using a nationwide database from the Korean Liver Cancer Association (validation set; n = 742).

RESULTS

In the training set, tumour factors such as tumour burden ≥10 cm, major portal vein invasion and distant metastasis, as well as underlying liver function, were independently associated with OS. BCLC stage C was classified into four substages (C1-4) according to the number of prognostic factors. Substages C1, C2, C3 and C4 showed a median OS of 17.50 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.57-26.43), 10.13 months (95% CI, 8.17-12.09), 4.20 months (95% CI, 3.42-4.98), and 2.90 months (95% CI, 2.34-3.46) respectively (P < 0.05). This substaging system also had good discriminative ability in predicting survival in the validation set. In addition, it was considered that the BCLC substaging is better than Hong Kong liver cancer substaging in predicting the OS for patients with advanced HCC.

CONCLUSION

Our substaging for BCLC stage C might help predict patients' prognosis better.

Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A limited amount of literature involves the clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy during operations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Our study aims to explore regional lymphadenectomy rate and node-positive rate, as well as their clinicopathological relevance and prognostic values in patients with HCC receiving liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Patients with HCC who received LR or LT and were diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 6367 patients with staging and regional lymphadenectomy information was included.

RESULTS

The regional lymphadenectomy rates were 14.3% and 28.6% in patients receiving LR and LT, respectively. Additionally, the rate of LT patients increased from 21.3% to 33.3% in the 2004-2013 time period. In patients with regional lymphadenectomy, node-positive rates were 8.4% and 0.9% in LR and LT patients, respectively. Regional lymphadenectomy was conducted relatively non-specifically in patients receiving LT compared with those receiving LR by analysing its clinicopathological relevance. Furthermore, regional lymphadenectomy did not improve prognosis in the general population or any subgroup.

CONCLUSION

There was a disparity between high regional lymphadenectomy rate and extremely low node-positive rate in patients with HCC receiving LT, which requires further improvement in future clinical practice.

Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages B and C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Time for a Subclassification

BACKGROUND

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate and advanced stages (BCLC B and C) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both include heterogeneous populations. Patients classified as BCLC stage B present with different tumour burdens, and the recommended treatment is transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). A similar heterogeneity of tumour burden and liver function can be found among patients classified as BCLC stage C, which includes diverse clinical features (performance status [PS] 1-2), macrovascular invasion (MVI) including portal vein tumour (PVT) thrombosis, and/or extra-hepatic spread. Nonetheless, the anti-tumoural treatment formally recommended by Western guidelines is systemic therapy with sorafenib.

SUMMARY

Several proposals of subclassification for both these stages have been suggested in recent years, differentiating the more appropriate treatments for each substage. In particular, for BCLC stage C patients with PVT, therapeutic indications, clinical outcomes, and response to locoregional therapy are notably different in the presence of subsegmental, segmental or main PVT. Accordingly, liver resection and transarterial therapies, such as TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) and 90Y-radioembolization (TARE), can be performed in locally advanced HCC with intrahepatic MVI according to its extent. In fact, surgery and TACE/TAE/TARE have no contraindications in the presence of PVT limited to the subsegmental or segmental branches in Child-Pugh class A patients, whereas only TARE should be utilized when there is lobar branch involvement. The presence of PS 1 should not be sufficient to allocate patients to the advanced stage since this would preclude any potential treatment for HCC. Patients should be properly classified as BCLC C only in cases of main portal trunk PVT, and treated according to the guidelines, provided that they belong to Child-Pugh class A.

KEY MESSAGES

Subclassifications of BCLC B and C stages are urgently needed and require validation in order to guide clinicians towards the most effective treatment option.

A serological scoring system to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis (LNM)has widely been recognized as a poor prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Preoperative prediction of LNM is important for clinicians to decide on treatment. This study was designed to develop a simple and convenient system to predict LNM.

METHODS

Consecutive HCC patients who were suspected to have LNM were divided into a training, an internal validation and an external validation cohort. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the threshold value of the preoperative serological variables. A nomogram visualization system model was then established.

RESULT

Of the 287 patients, there were 31 patients who had LNM (10.8%), and 21 of 203 patients (10.3%) were in the training cohort and 10 of 84 patients (11.9%) in the internal validation cohort. Sixteen of 176 patients (9.1%) in the external validation cohort had LNM. The serological indices including neutrophil/lymphocyte rate, age, platelet, prothrombin time, and total protein, were included in the nomogram. The areas of the ROC curve were 0.846, 0.679 and 0.738 in predicting LNM in the training cohort, the internal validation cohort and the external validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system constructed using the preoperative serological variables predicted LNM in HCC patients.

Role of local treatment including radiotherapy in Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage C patients: a nationwide cohort analysis in South Korea

Purpose

Sorafenib is recommended as the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC C). However, local treatment including radiation therapy (LRT) is also widely administered in practice. The aim of our study was to define the role of LRT among BCLC C patients.

Patients and methods

Of the patients with HCC enrolled the Korean Central Cancer Registry from 2008 to 2014, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted 10,580 patient data from ~50 hospitals nationwide. Among them, 3,401 patients were categorized to have BCLC C HCC. Among them, patients with information on initial treatments, defined as the first and secondary treatment within 60 days after the first treatment, were selected and classified into three initial treatment groups: LRT, sorafenib, and no treatment.

Results

Among 3,401 BCLC C HCC patients, 1,486 were included in the study and the remaining patients were excluded as they did not meet the criteria (eg, underwent local treatments without radiotherapy [RT] or received chemotherapy other than sorafenib). Of these, 266 were assigned to LRT (17.9%), 316 to sorafenib (21.3%), and 904 to no treatment group (60.8%). Median survival time of the sorafenib group was shorter than that of the LRT group (3.8 vs 7.6 months, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, sorafenib group showed significantly higher risk related to mortality compared to LRT group, not only among all patients (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84) but also between subgroup cohorts with portal invasions (1.55, 1.23-1.84), with lymph node metastases (2.42, 1.53-3.83), without distant metastases (1.43, 1.10-1.87), and with distant metastases (1.57, 1.13-2.19). Additionally, no treatment group showed the worst survival among the three treatment groups not only in all patients, but also in all subgroups of patients (P<0.001 in all).

Conclusion

LRT as an initial treatment showed survival benefit as compared to sorafenib in HCC patients of BCLC C.

The power of tumor sizes in predicting the survival of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background

Vascular invasion, rather than tumor size, was applied into the 7th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system to predict survival of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, does this mean tumor size is of little value in prognostic prediction? The current study was designed to explore the prognostic ability of tumor sizes in solitary HCC.

Methods

A total of 18 591 patients with solitary HCC categorized as T1 and T2 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was adopted to evaluate the impact of tumor sizes on overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) in general and in subgroups stratified by vascular invasion and surgery type.

Results

Large tumor sizes (>39 mm) were associated with unfavorable clinicopathologic characteristics. Compared with tumors ≤30 mm, tumors between 31‐50 mm and tumors >50 mm showed significantly worse OS and DSS in general using multivariate analysis (all P < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, for patients without vascular invasion, tumor size was a notable prognostic indicator for OS in the radiofrequency ablation group (P < 0.001), rather than in the liver resection or transplantation group. Nevertheless, for patients with vascular invasion, tumor sizes exhibited a notable impact on OS in the liver resection and transplantation group.

Conclusions

The AJCC TNM staging system for solitary HCC would be more comprehensive if tumor sizes were integrated into the T2 classification. Additionally, for T1 patients, tumor sizes play no role in the choice between resection and transplantation.

The role of external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Purpose

Lymph node metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma is categorized as advanced in Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer staging, and sorafenib is a sole treatment recommended. However, appliance of local treatment including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has not been uncommon. We performed a meta-analysis and systemically reviewed current literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EBRT.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library, and Embase were systemically searched until December 17, 2017. The primary endpoint of analyses was response rate (RR), and 1-year overall survival and complication rates of grade ≥3 were secondary endpoints. Complications were primarily assessed descriptively.

Results

A total of 8 studies comprising 521 patients were included. The pooled RR was 73.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.6–80.9), and high-dose EBRT groups had better RR than the low-dose group (82.2% [95% CI: 74.4–88.1] vs 51.1% [95% CI: 40.3–61.7]; P=0.001]. The pooled 1-year overall survival rate was 41.0% (95% CI: 32.9–49.6). Six studies assessed the survival benefit according to RR, and 5 (83.3%) of these 6 studies reported statistically significant survival benefit. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal complication, with pooled rates of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.2–9.5) and 3.5% (95% CI:1.7–7.2), respectively.

Conclusion

EBRT showed a pooled RR of 73.1% and was safely performed. EBRT might palliate symptoms through tumor reductions and improve survival. Use of sorafenib combined or sequentially with EBRT can be recommended rather than monotherapy.

Liver Transplantation and Liver Resection for Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Long-Term Survivals

BACKGROUND

Both liver transplantation (LT) and liver resection (LR) represent curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with liver cirrhosis. In this study, we have compared outcomes between historical and more recent patient cohorts scheduled either for LT or LR, respectively.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of all patients with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent LT or LR between 1989 and 2011 were evaluated. Overall survival of patients with HCC within the Milan criteria (MC) was analyzed focusing on changes between different time periods.

RESULTS

In total, 364 and 141 patients underwent LT and LR for HCC in cirrhosis, respectively. Among patients with HCC within MC, 214 and 59 underwent LT and LR, respectively. Postoperative morbidity (37 vs. 11%, P < .0001), but not mortality (3 vs. 1%, P = .165), was higher after LR than after LT for HCC within MC. In the period 1989-2004, overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in patients who underwent LT compared to LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 77 vs. 36%, P < .0001). Interestingly, in the more recent period 2005-2011, OS was comparable between LT and LR for HCC within MC (5-year OS: 73 vs. 61%, P = .07).

CONCLUSION

We have noted an improvement of outcomes among patients selected for partial hepatectomy in recent years that were comparable to stable results after LT in cirrhotic patients with HCC. Whether those improvements are due to advances in liver surgery, optimized perioperative managament for patients with liver cirrhosis, and the development of modern multimodal treatment strategies for the recurrent lesions appears plausible.

Liver Resection and Surgical Strategies for Management of Primary Liver Cancer

Primary liver cancer-including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)-incidence is increasing and is an important source of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Management of these cancers, even when localized, is challenging due to the association with underlying liver disease and the complex anatomy of the liver. Although for ICC, surgical resection provides the only potential cure, for HCC, the risks and benefits of the multiple curative intent options must be considered to individualize treatment based upon tumor factors, baseline liver function, and the functional status of the patient. The principles of surgical resection for both HCC and ICC include margin-negative resections with preservation of adequate function of the residual liver. As the safety of surgical resection has improved in recent years, the role of liver resection for HCC has expanded to include selected patients with preserved liver function and small tumors (ablation as an alternative), tumors within Milan criteria (transplant as an alternative), and patients with large (>5 cm) and giant (>10 cm) HCC or with poor prognostic features (for whom surgery is infrequently offered) due to a survival benefit with resection for selected patients. An important surgical consideration specifically for ICC includes the high risk of nodal metastasis, for which portal lymphadenectomy is recommended at the time of hepatectomy for staging. For both diseases, onco-surgical strategies including portal vein embolization and parenchymal-sparing resections have increased the number of patients eligible for curative liver resection by improving patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical in the management of patients with primary liver cancer to provide and coordinate the best treatments possible for these patients.

Report of the 19th follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan

The 19th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan comprised 20 850 primary liver cancer patients newly registered at 482 medical institutions over a period of 2 years (from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2007). Of these, 94.7% had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 4.4% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In addition, follow-up data were obtained regarding 34 752 patients who were registered in the previous survey. Epidemiological and clinicopathological factors, diagnosis, and treatment were examined in newly registered patients. Compared with the 18th follow-up survey, the present follow-up survey suggested an increase in the number of elderly and female patients, a reduction in the number of hepatitis B surface antigen- and anti-hepatitis C virus antibody-positive patients, and a reduction in tumor size at the time of clinical diagnosis. In terms of local ablation therapy, the number of patients receiving radiofrequency ablation therapy increased. The cumulative survival rates for newly registered patients between 1996 and 2007 were calculated for each histological type (HCC, ICC, and combined HCC and ICC) and stratified according to background factors and treatments. The cumulative survival rates of newly registered patients between 1978 and 2007 were calculated after dividing individuals into groups according to registration date (1978-1987, 1988-1997, and 1998-2007). The data obtained from this follow-up survey will contribute to the medical management of primary liver cancer and facilitate future research.

Evaluating the current surgical strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Despite careful surveillance programs and the development of antiviral therapy for hepatitis virus infection, the occurrence rate of HCC remains high. Liver resection and liver transplantation are mainstay curative treatments. Most patients with HCC have impaired liver function, and surgical treatment is always accompanied by the risk of decompensation of the remnant liver, especially when the volume of the remnant liver is too small and the liver function too low to meet metabolic demands. The mortality of liver resection has dramatically decreased over the last three decades from 20% to less than 5% due to the accumulation of knowledge of liver anatomy, perioperative management and preoperative assessment of liver function. Here we provide an overview of the multidisciplinary treatments and current standard treatment strategies for HCC, to explore the possibility of expanding surgical treatments beyond the current standards.

Different survival of Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage C hepatocellular carcinoma patients by the extent of portal vein invasion and the type of extrahepatic spread

Portal vein invasion (PVI) and extrahepatic spread (ES) are two tumor-related factors that define advanced stage in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system (BCLC stage C), and the recommended first line therapy in this stage is sorafenib. However, the extent of PVI and the type of ES may affect patient prognosis as well as treatment outcome. This study analyzed survival of BCLC stage C HCC patients in order to see whether sub-classification of BCLC stage C is necessary. A total of 582 treatment naïve, BCLC stage C HCC patients [age: 54.3 ± 10.8 years, males = 494 (84.9%), hepatitis B virus (458, 78.7%)], defined by PVI and/or ES, were analyzed. Extent of PVI was divided into none, type I-segmental/sectoral branches, type II-left and/or right portal vein, and type III-main portal vein trunk. Type of ES was divided into nodal and distant metastasis. The extent of PVI and type of ES were independent factors for survival. When patients were sub-classified according to the extent of PVI and type of ES, the median survival was significantly different [11.7 months, 5.7 months, 4.9 months and 2.3 months for C1 (PVI-O/I without distant ES), C2 (PVI-II/III without distant ES), C3 (PVI-0/I with distant ES), and C4 (PVI-II/III with distant ES), respectively, P = 0.01]. Patients' survival was different according to the treatment modality in each sub-stage. Sub-classification of BCLC stage C according to the extent of PVI and type of ES resulted in a better prediction of survival. Also, different outcome was observed by treatment modalities in each sub-stage. Sub-classification of BCLC stage C is required to minimize heterogeneity within the same tumor stage, that will help better predict survival and to select optimal treatment strategies.

Survival benefit of liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The role of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages is controversial. We aimed at measuring the survival benefit of resection vs. non-surgical-therapies in each BCLC stage.

METHODS

Using the ITA.LI.CA database, we identified 2090 BCLC A, B, and C HCC patients observed between 2000 and 2012: 550 underwent resection, 1046 loco-regional therapy (LRT), and 494 best supportive care (BSC). A multivariate log-logistic model was chosen to predict median survival (MS) after resection vs. MS after LRT or BSC. The results were expressed as net survival benefit of resection: (MS resection-MS LRT)/MS BSC.

RESULTS

After stratifying for BCLC stage, the median net survival benefit of resection over LRT was: BCLC 0=62% (40%, 82%), A=45% (13%, 65%), B=46% (9%, 76%), C=-16% (-55%, 33%). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score>9, Child B class, and performance status (PST)=2 were the main risk factors for liver resection. 1181 Child A patients (57%) with MELD⩽9 and PST<2 had always a large positive net survival benefit of resection over LRT, independently of BCLC stage: BCLC 0=64% (44%, 85%), A=59% (45%, 74%), B=71% (52%, 90%), C=56% (36%, 78%). Among the 909 (43%) patients with at least one risk factor (MELD>9 or PST=2 or Child B class), resection did not prove any survival benefit over LRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection could result in survival benefit over LRT for HCC patients regardless of their BCLC stage, provided that liver dysfunction (Child B or MELD>9) and PST>1 are absent.

Liver resection for HCC: patient's selection and controversial scenarios

Liver resection is a valuable curative option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, the balance between the operative risk following hepatectomy for HCC occurring on chronic liver disease and the oncologic prognosis of advanced lesions have led treatment recommendations to limiting the place of liver resection to selected patients with preserved liver function harbouring early-stage tumours. However, better understanding of the natural history of both tumour and underlying liver disease, sophisticated assessment of the liver function, improvements in the preoperative management of the patients with the use of liver volume modulation, refinements in surgical technique including anatomic resection and laparoscopic approach along with tailored management of recurrences have led expert centres to better define and extend the indications for liver resection. In this setting, the reported favourable operative results and long-term outcomes following resection of HCC in a number of controversial scenarios support that current guidelines could be refined.