1
|
Lele AV, Moreton EO, Sundararajan J, Blacker SN. Perioperative care of patients with recent stroke undergoing nonemergent, nonneurological, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:460-469. [PMID: 39011660 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of published literature regarding postoperative stroke and mortality in patients with a history of stroke and to provide a framework for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care in an elective setting. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with nonneurological, noncardiac, and nonvascular surgery within three months after stroke have a 153-fold risk, those within 6 months have a 50-fold risk, and those within 12 months have a 20-fold risk of postoperative stroke. There is a 12-fold risk of in-hospital mortality within three months and a three-to-four-fold risk of mortality for more than 12 months after stroke. The risk of stroke and mortality continues to persist years after stroke. Recurrent stroke is common in patients in whom anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy is discontinued. Stroke and time elapsed after stroke should be included in the preoperative assessment questionnaire, and a stroke-specific risk assessment should be performed before surgical planning is pursued. SUMMARY In patients with a history of a recent stroke, anesthesiology, surgery, and neurology experts should create a shared mental model in which the patient/surrogate decision-maker is informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed surgical procedure; secondary-stroke-prevention medications are reviewed; plans are made for interruptions and resumption; and intraoperative care is individualized to reduce the likelihood of postoperative stroke or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit V Lele
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Samuel Neal Blacker
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ringel NE, Lenger SM, High R, Alas A, Houlihan S, Chang OH, Pennycuff J, Singh R, White A, Lipitskaia L, Behbehani S, Sheyn D, Kudish B, Nihira M, Sleemi A, Grimes C, Gupta A, Balk EM, Antosh DD. Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:539-549. [PMID: 38330397 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39). CONCLUSION Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022326255.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy E Ringel
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist, Houston, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; the Division of Female Urology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, and KPC Healthcare, Hemet, California; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, and Bela Vida Urogynecology, Celebration, Florida; the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper Health University, Camden, New Jersey; the Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; the International Medical Response Foundation, Brooklyn, and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; and the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|