Predictors of mortality, limb loss, and discharge disposition at admission among patients with necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections

Analysis of 19 439 lower limb amputations in children in Brazilian health system over 14 years

BACKGROUND

Amputations in children represent significant events. Few studies analyse amputations in this specific population, and most of them are old, regionalised and with small sample sizes. Besides, there are no large studies in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to analyse a large sample of amputations (19 439 procedures performed in the Brazilian public health system) in children aged 0-14 over 14 years.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional population-based analysis of all lower limb amputations performed in the Brazilian public health system between 2008 and 2021 in children up to 14. Using a public database, all types of amputations were selected, defining the number of procedures, their main aetiologies, trends over the years, patient demographics and regional distribution.

RESULTS

19 439 lower limb amputations were performed in the Brazilian public health system between 2008 and 2021, mainly at the toe level (85%). Amputations occurred predominantly in males (64%) and children aged 0-4 (47%). The global trend is a non-significant decrease in the total number of amputations over the period (p=0.427), but we observe a significant decrease (p<0.001) in amputations in older children (aged 10-14). Amputations are more concentrated in the most populated regions, while the highest mortality is found in the least densely populated areas. Trauma is the main aetiology associated with lower limb amputations in Brazilian children (60%).

CONCLUSION

The epidemiology of amputations in Brazil differs from the rest of the world. Trauma is the main aetiology.

Current diagnosis and management of necrotizing soft tissue infections: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Necrotizing soft tissue infections are rare bacterial infections of the skin and soft tissues with a high morbidity and mortality rate, requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. These represent a spectrum of disease resulting in tissue necrosis that is rapidly progressive; however, they remain a diagnostic challenge because the average surgeon or emergency medicine provider may only see one or two over the course of their career. Diagnosis is largely clinical and based on subtle physical examination findings, physiologic instability, and laboratory derangements. Aids to diagnosis such as scoring systems and cross-sectional imaging may be used; however, the findings are not specific, so management should not be based on these alone. The most common cause of necrotizing soft tissue infection is polymicrobial infection; however, specific bacteria such as clostridial species, group A streptococcal, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and aquatic bacteria may also be causative. Initial management includes broad spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation for severe sepsis, and early aggressive surgical debridement. Often, these patients require multiple operative debridement to achieve source control, and a low threshold for repeat debridement should be maintained because these infections can progress rapidly. Once source control is achieved, patients may be left with extensive wounds requiring multidisciplinary care and wound management. Necrotizing infections have long been viewed based on mortality outcomes alone because of their rarity and severity. Over recent years, more reports have shown a decrease in the mortality rates from those previously reported, allowing for a focus on methods to improve morbidity of these infections.

Association between Insurance Status and Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

Background: Lack of insurance is associated with poorer outcomes in hospitalized patients. However, few studies have explored this association in hospitalizations for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). This study examined the impact of insurance status on the outcome of NSTI admissions. Methods: All adult hospitalizations for necrotizing fasciitis, gas gangrene, and Fournier gangrene between 2016 and 2018 were examined using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Insurance status was categorized as insured (including Medicare, Medicaid, and Private, including Health maintenance organization (HMO) or uninsured (Self-pay). Outcome measures included mortality rates, limb loss, length of hospital stay, prolonged hospital stay, and critical care admissions. Statistical analysis included weighted sample analysis, chi-square tests, multivariate regression analysis, and negative binomial regression modeling. Results: Approximately 29,705 adult hospitalizations for NSTIs were analyzed. Of these, 57.4% (17,065) were due to necrotizing fasciitis, 22% (6,545) to gas gangrene, and 20.5% (6,095) to Fournier gangrene. Approximately 9.7% (2,875) were uninsured, whereas 70% (26,780) had insurance coverage. Among the insured, Medicare covered 39.6% (10,605), Medicaid 29% (7,775), and private insurance 31.4% (8,400). After adjustments, Medicare insurance was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-2.47; p = 0.001). Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation (aOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.47; p < 0.001), whereas private insurance was associated with lower odds of amputation (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; p = 0.030). Medicaid insurance was associated with greater odds of prolonged hospital stay (aOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09-1.64; p < 0.001). No significant association was observed between the lack of insurance or self-pay and the odds of primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Medicare insurance was correlated with greater odds of mortality, whereas Medicaid insurance was associated with increased odds of amputation and longer hospital stay. Uninsured status was not associated with significant differences in NSTI outcomes.

Necrotizing fasciitis: an update on epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to discuss the latest evidence of epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) with a particular focus on necrotizing fasciitis (NF).

RECENT FINDINGS

NSTIs have been historically referred to as NF but encompass a broader range of infections, with variable rates ranging from 0.86 to 32.64 per 100 000 person-years, influenced by factors such as climate and seasonal variations. They have diverse microbiological profiles categorized into different types based on the involved pathogens, including polymicrobial or monomicrobial infections caused by organisms such as group A streptococcus (GAS), Staphylococcus aureus , some Gram-negative pathogens, and filamentous fungi following trauma and natural disasters. Diagnosis relies on clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory markers, and imaging. However, the gold standard for diagnosis remains intraoperative tissue culture. Treatment involves repeated surgical debridement of necrotic tissues in addition to intravenous antibiotics. Adjuvant therapies with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) might have a role. Soft tissue reconstruction may be necessary following surgery.

SUMMARY

Prompt diagnosis and proper medical and surgical management of NSTI will improve outcomes.

Risk model for predicting mortality in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to look into the factors that lead to death in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections（NSTIs） in the intensive care unit and create a mortality risk model.

METHODS

The clinical data of 106 patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections admitted to intensive care unit(ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between January 2008 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the risk factors impacting patient mortality. The regression coefficient in binary logistic regression analysis was converted into the item score in the model, and then the model score of each patient was calculated. Finally, an ROC curve was constructed to evaluate the efficiency of the model for predicting mortality. Thirteen patients with NSTIs admitted to ICU between January 2022 and November 2022 were used to validate the model.

RESULTS

The death group had 44 patients, while the survival group had 62 patients. The overall mortality was 41.5%. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that risk factors for mortality were age≥ 60 years(OR:4.419; 95%CI:1.093-17.862; P = 0.037), creatinine ≥ 132μmol/L(OR:11.166; 95%CI:2.234-55.816; P = 0.003), creatine kinase ≥ 1104 U/L(OR:4.019; 95%CI:1.134-14.250; P = 0.031), prothrombin time ≥ 24.4 s(OR:11.589; 95%CI:2.510-53.506; P = 0.002), and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR:17.404; 95%CI:4.586-66.052; P＜0.000). The AUC of the model for predicting mortality was 0.940 (95% CI:0.894-0.986). When the cut-off value for the model was 4 points, the sensitivity was 95.5% and the specificity was 83.9%.

CONCLUSION

The death risk model in this study for NSTIs patients in the intensive care unit shows high sensitivity and specificity. Patients with a score of ≥ 4 points have a higher risk of mortality.

IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIALLY MODIFIABLE FACTORS TO IMPROVE RECOGNITION AND OUTCOME OF NECROTIZING SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS

ABSTRACT

Background : Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) present a surgical emergency of increasing incidence, which is often misdiagnosed and associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. A retrospective multicenter (11 hospitals) cohort study was initiated to identify the early predictors of misdiagnosis, mortality, and morbidity (skin defect size and amputation). Methods : Patients of all ages who presented with symptoms and were admitted for acute treatment of NSTIs between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify early predictors (available before or during the first debridement surgery), with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results : The median age of the cohort (N = 216) was 59.5 (interquartile range = 23.6) years, of which 138 patients (63.9%) were male. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections most frequently originated in the legs (31.0%) and anogenital area (30.5%). More than half of the patients (n = 114, 54.3%) were initially misdiagnosed. Thirty-day mortality was 22.9%. Amputation of an extremity was performed in 26 patients (12.5%). Misdiagnosis was more likely in patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (β = 0.20, P = 0.001), and less likely when symptoms started in the anogenital area (β = -1.20, P = 0.003). Besides the established risk factors for mortality (septic shock and age), misdiagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (β = 1.03, P = 0.01). The strongest predictors of the final skin defect size were septic shock (β = 2.88, P < 0.001) and a skin-sparing approach to debridement (β = -1.79, P = 0.002). Conclusion : Recognition of the disease is essential for the survival of patients affected by NSTI, as is adequate treatment of septic shock. The application of a skin-sparing approach to surgical debridement may decrease morbidity.

Accelerating Patterned Vascularization Using Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds and Surgical Micropuncture

Bulk hydrogel scaffolds are common in reconstructive surgery. They allow for the staged repair of soft tissue loss by providing a base for revascularization. Unfortunately, they are limited by both slow and random vascularization, which may manifest as treatment failure or suboptimal repair. Rapidly inducing patterned vascularization within biomaterials has profound translational implications for current clinical treatment paradigms and the scaleup of regenerative engineering platforms. To address this long-standing challenge, a novel microsurgical approach and granular hydrogel scaffold (GHS) technology are co-developed to hasten and pattern microvascular network formation. In surgical micropuncture (MP), targeted recipient blood vessels are perforated using a microneedle to accelerate cell extravasation and angiogenic outgrowth. By combining MP with an adjacent GHS with precisely tailored void space architecture, microvascular pattern formation as assessed by density, diameter, length, and intercapillary distance is rapidly guided. This work opens new translational opportunities for microvascular engineering, advancing reconstructive surgery, and regenerative medicine.

The Role of Burn Centers in the Treatment of Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections: A Nationwide Dutch Study

Patients with extensive and complex wounds due to Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections (NSTI) may be referred to a burn center. This study describes the characteristics, outcomes, as well as diagnostic challenges of these patients. Patients admitted to three hospitals with a burn center for the treatment of NSTI in a 5-year period were included. Eighty patients (median age 54 years, 60% male) were identified, of whom 30 (38%) were referred by other centers, usually after survival of the initial septic phase. Those referred from other centers, compared to those primarily admitted to the study hospitals, were more likely to have group A streptococcal involvement (62% vs 35%, p = .02), larger wounds (median 7% vs 2% total body surface area, p < .001), and a longer length of stay (median 49 vs 22 days, p < .001). Despite a high incidence of septic shock (50%), the mortality rate was low (12%) for those primarily admitted. Approximately half (53%) of the patients were initially misdiagnosed upon presentation, which was associated with delay to first surgery (16 hours vs 4 hours, p < .001). Those initially misdiagnosed had more (severe) comorbidities, and less frequently reported pain or blue livid discoloration of the skin. This study underlines the burn centers' function as referral centers for extensively affected patients with NSTI. Besides the unique wound and reconstructive expertise, the low mortality rate indicates these centers provide adequate acute care as well. A major remaining challenge remains recognition of the disease upon presentation. Future studies in which factors associated with misdiagnosis are explored are needed.

Defining the Optimal Antibiotic Duration in Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Clinical Experience from a Quaternary Referral Center

Background: Early initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents is a cornerstone of the care of necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTI). However, the optimal duration of antibiotic agents is unclear. We sought to characterize antibiotic prescribing patterns for patients with NSTI, as well as associated complications. Patients and Methods: Using an NSTI registry, we characterized antibiotic use at a quaternary referral center. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to describe overall antibiotic duration and relative to operative source control, stratified by presence of other infections that independently influenced antibiotic duration. Factors associated with successful antibiotic discontinuation were identified using logistic regression. Results: Between 2015 and 2018, 441 patients received antibiotic agents for NSTI with 18% experiencing a complicating secondary infection. Among those without a complicating infection, the median duration of antibiotic administration was 9.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-10.5) overall, and 7.0 days after the final debridement. Perineal NSTI received fewer days of antibiotic agents (8.3 vs. 10.6) compared with NSTI without perineal involvement. White blood cell (WBC) count and fever were not associated with failure of antibiotic discontinuation, however, a chronic wound as the underlying infection etiology was associated with greater odds of antibiotic discontinuation failure (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% CI, 1.24-15.1). Conclusions: A seven-day course of antibiotic agents after final operative debridement may be sufficient for NSTI without any secondary complicating infections, because clinical characteristics do not appear to be associated with differences in successful antibiotic discontinuation.

Is Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio or Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Associated with Risk of Mortality in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis

Purpose

Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) are novel biomarkers to indicate the inflammatory/immune response, and demonstrated to be effective in diagnosis, severity evaluation, and prognosis in a variety of chronic or acute conditions. This study aims to examine whether NLR, PLR and EDW are independently associated with mortality in necrotizing fasciitis (NF).

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with NF and based on vitality status during hospitalization or within 30 days after discharge, survival and non-survival groups were defined. For distinctly comparing NLR, PLR, RDW and others, we enrolled the matched healthy controls of the same age and sex as the survivors of NF in a 1:1 ratio, which constituted the healthy control group. Comparisons were made between three groups. Variables tested with a P value < 0.10 were further entered into the multivariate logistic regression model to identify their independent association with mortality.

Results

A total of 281 subjects were included, including 127 healthy controls, 127 survivors, and 27 nonsurvivors with NF, respectively, indicating a mortality rate of 17.5%. ROC analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value for NLR, PLR and RDW was 11.1, 196.0 and 15.5%, respectively, and was tested as significant only for the first two (P < 0.001, = 0.004). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that NLR ≥ 11.1 (OR, 2.51) and PLR ≥ 196.0 (OR, 2.09) were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality in NF patients, together with age ((OR, 1.28, for each 10-year increment), comorbid diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.69) and liver disease (OR, 1.86), and elevated creatinine level (OR, 1.21 for each 10 umol/L elevation).

Conclusion

Elevated NLR and PLR are significant and independent predictors of mortality and can be considered for use when evaluating patients at risk of mortality.

Necrotising soft tissue infection in the present era: an analysis of clinicopathological features and predictors of mortality

Background

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) and non-NSTI are frequently difficult to distinguish based on symptoms, signs, and investigations. High morbidity related to it can only be avoided by early detection and treatment.

Aim

This study examined demographic, clinicopathological, NSTI prognosis, and mortality factors.

Methodology

80 NSTI patients were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological profile, surgical management, histological report, and LRINEC score were included. Mortality predictions were evaluated between survivors and non-survivors.

Results

73.8 percent of patients were male and the mean age was 55.4±9.6 years. Nonsurvivors averaged 11.88±0.72 LRINEC scores. Non-survivor CRP averaged 236.5±48.5 mg/l. Gp A Hemolytic Streptococci were most frequent (37.8 percent ). Diabetes was a significant mortality predictor. Total mortality was 20%.

Conclusion

NSTI remains a major killer. High mortality is linked to age, diabetes, higher blood creatinine, MODS, and delayed surgery." and proceed accordingly.

The impact of necrotizing soft tissue infections on the lives of survivors: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are potentially lethal infections marked by local tissue destruction and systemic sepsis, which require aggressive treatment. Survivors often face a long recovery trajectory. This study was initiated to increase understanding of the long-term impact of NSTI on health related quality of life (HRQoL), and how care may be improved.

METHODS

Thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data from 25 NSTI-survivors obtained through two focus groups (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 11).

RESULTS

The median age of the participants was 49 years, 14 were female. The median time since diagnosis was 5 years. Initial misdiagnosis was common, causing delay to treatment. Survivors experienced long-term physical consequences (scarring, cognitive impairment, fatigue, sleeping problems, recurrent infections), psychological consequences (traumatic stress symptoms, fear of relapse, adjusting to an altered appearance, sexual issues) and social and relational consequences (changes in social contacts, a lack of understanding). The disease also had a major psychological impact on family members, as well as major financial impact in some. There was a strong desire to reflect on 'mistakes' in case of initial misdiagnosis. To improve care, patient and family centered care, smooth transitions after discharge, and the availability of understandable information were deemed important.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that NSTI have a large impact on physical and psychosocial wellbeing of survivors and their relatives. Except for a few differences (misdiagnosis, fear for re-infection and actual re-infection), the patient experience of patients with NSTI is largely similar to those of burn survivors. Thus, questionnaires to assess HRQoL in burn survivors may be used in future NSTI studies.

Reconstruction of necrotizing soft tissue infection in the auricle and temporal region: a case report

A 43-year-old female patient had a necrotizing soft tissue infection in the temporal region. Because of the necrotic temporoparietal fascia, auricular reconstruction was attempted using the temporalis muscle flap; the flap was successfully placed. The use of the temporalis muscle flap was considered a treatment option for salvaging the auricle.

Impact of Comorbidities on the Cause of Death by Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the cause of death in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) stratified by patient's pre-existing comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification 3/4 vs. ASA 1/2). Differences in clinical presentation, mortality rate, and factors associated with mortality between those two comorbidity groups were investigated. Patients and Methods: A retrospective multicenter study of patients with NSTIs between 2010 and 2020 was conducted. The primary outcome was the cause of death within the first 30 days. Furthermore, factors associated with mortality were identified. All analysis were stratified by severity of comorbidities (ASA 1/2 or ASA 3/4). Results: Of the 187 patients, 39 patients (21%) died within 30 days. American Society of Anesthesiologists 1/2 patients (overall mortality rate, 11%) died more often as direct result of the infection compared with ASA 3/4 patients (overall mortality rate, 33%) (ASA 1/2 group: 92% vs. ASA 3/4 group: 48%; p = 0.013). American Society of Anesthesiologists 3/4 patients died more often due to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies based on assumed poor outcome after severe critical illness (ASA 1/2 group: 52% vs. ASA 3/4 group: 8%; p = 0.013). Conclusions: Mortality rates of patients with NSTIs varied from 11% in previously healthy patients to 33% in patients with multiple or severe comorbidities. The predominant cause of mortality was overwhelming infection and associated sepsis in healthy patients whereas in patients with multiple or severe pre-existing medical disease, death most often occurred after treatment limitations based on patient's wishes and prognosis.

Use of Clindamycin for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Decreases Amputation Rate

OBJECTIVE

To identify the impact of clindamycin use on mortality and amputation rates in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center, single-center study.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

All patients from 2008 to 2019 with a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. One hundred ninety patients were included in statistical analysis.

INTERVENTION

Use of clindamycin in the initial antibiotic regimen in the treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Amputation and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Patients who received clindamycin had 2.92 times reduced odds of having an amputation when compared with their counterparts, even when American Society of Anesthesiologist scores, comorbidities, smoking, drug use, alcohol consumption, race, ethnicity, sex, and age were controlled for and regardless of other antibiotics started (P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in mortality rate between those patients who did and did not receive clindamycin as part of their initial antibiotic regimen (8.3% vs. 11.6%, respectively; P = 0.453).

CONCLUSION

The use of clindamycin in the initial antibiotic regimen for treatment of NSTI was shown to significantly decrease rates of amputation but not mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Upper Extremity Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

INTRODUCTION

One of the main aspects of management for necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is surgical excision and debridement, which can result in large soft tissue defects. This study examined the reconstructive options and outcomes of patients with upper extremity NSTIs.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients from a single institution who were diagnosed with an upper extremity NSTI between 2014 and 2019. Patient characteristics, infectious etiology, surgical debridements, reconstructive procedures, and secondary procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 99 patients included in the study. The median size of the wound from the initial surgical debridement was 100 cm2 (interquartile range, 300 cm2). The mean number of debridements was 3.4. Seven patients underwent amputations, and 12 patients died. Most wounds were reconstructed via delayed primary closure (15 patients), skin grafting (16 patients), or a combination of the two (30 patients). Three patients underwent reverse radial forearm flaps, 1 patient underwent a groin flap, 3 patients underwent pedicled latissimus muscle flaps, and 2 patients underwent local flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flaps. Seven patients did not undergo any surgical reconstruction, and their wounds were managed with local wound care. Eight patients had complete or partial failure of their initial soft reconstruction requiring an additional operation, and 5 patients had secondary operations for neuromas and/or contractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients with upper extremity NSTIs survive and undergo successful reconstruction of their wounds. Few patients required additional procedures for reconstructive failure or sequela of their wounds.

Characterization of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections in Obese and Non-Obese Patients

Background: The impact of obesity on the pathogenesis and prognosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) is unclear. The goal of this study was to characterize differences in NSTI presentation and outcomes by obesity status. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of institutional data for patients diagnosed with NSTIs were identified (n = 619; 2011-2020). Patients were divided based on obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m²) and non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m²). Primary outcomes included NSTI location, micro-organisms, and index hospitalization data. Multiple logistic regression was used to model predictors of in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Results: The obese cohort (n = 390; 63%) had higher rates of congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. There were no differences in length of stay, mortality, or discharge disposition between groups. A higher rate of respiratory failure was observed in the obese versus non-obese group (36.7% vs. 20.9%; p < 0.0005). The obese cohort was associated with perineal (40.8% vs. 27.0%) and torso NSTIs (20.9% vs. 15.8%; p < 0.005) but reduced staphylococcal (19.2% vs. 27.4%; p = 0.02) and group A streptococcal (2.6% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.03) infections, and increased polymicrobial infections. Class 2 obesity was a negative predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.5) and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8), when adjusting for demographic data, type of infection, and baseline comorbidities. Conclusions: Necrotizing soft tissue infections in obesity may present with unique distributions and microbial characteristics. Class 2 obesity may exhibit a survival benefit compared with non-obese patients, suggestive of an obesity paradox.

Distinctions between Fournier's gangrene and lower extremity necrotising fasciitis: microbiology and factors affecting mortality

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to illustrate distinctions between Fournier's gangrene (FG) and lower extremity necrotising fasciitis (NF) and screen out possible risk factors of poor prognosis for each cohort.

METHODS

The medical records of qualified patients with NF admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Yibin from January 2016 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All participants were anatomically categorised into FG and lower extremity NF groups, and their baseline data and microbiological results were compared. Further comparisons of critical parameters were conducted between survivors and nonsurvivors within each group.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included in the study with a median age of 58 years, and overall mortality was 20.4%. There were 18 patients with FG and 31 patients with lower extremity NF. A microbiology distinction was found-the predominance of gram-negative infection in FG and gram-positive infection in lower extremity NF. High Fournier's gangrene severity index scores (greater than 7), advanced age, procalcitonin and D-dimer value were identified as risk factors for FG, and the presentation of sepsis was an alarming indicator for lower extremity NF.

CONCLUSIONS

The distinction of microbiology might provide advice for appropriate antibacterial administrations. In addition, with practical prognostic predicting tools, clinicians might be able to identify patients at increased risk and intervene promptly to avoid unfavourable outcomes.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infection

Necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is a medical emergency. We investigated the impact of racial, socioeconomic disparities, and comorbidities on mortality, complications, length of stay, and charges in patients with NSTI.

Data were acquired from the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015 to 2017. ICD-10, Clinical Modification codes were utilized to identify relevant cases. Logistic regression was used to assess socioeconomic, racial, and health risk factors for adverse outcomes in NSTI patients.

Of 16,071,053 cases identified during the study period, 15,078 (0.094%) NSTI cases were recognized. Black patients had increased odds of amputation (OR 1.40 95% CI 1.24-1.58, p < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.40 95% CI 1.24-1.58, p < 0.001), excessive charges (OR 1.22 95% CI 1.03-1.43, p = 0.019), and adverse discharge disposition (OR 1.32 95% CI 1.19-1.46, p < 0.001) compared to white patients. Hispanic patients had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.30 95% CI 1.05-1.60, p = 0.014) and amputation (OR 1.21 95% CI 1.04-1.42, p = 0.016) compared to white patients. Medicare patients had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.35 95% CI 1.09-1.67, p = 0.006), Medicaid patients had increased odd of amputation (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.17-1.51, p < 0.001) and prolonged LOS (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.17-1.51, p < 0.001). Patients in the lower income quartiles had decreased odds of amputation compared to the highest income quartile, including the 26^th to 50^th income quartile (OR 0.84 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p = 0.022) and 51^st to 75^th income quartile (OR 0.84 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p = 0.022).

Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist for patients being treated for NSTIs.

Outcomes of Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Propensity-Matched Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are severe, rapidly spreading infections with high morbidity and mortality. Attempts to identify risk factors for mortality and morbidity have produced variable results. We hope to determine which factors across the NSTI population impact mortality, morbidities, and discharge disposition. Patients and Methods: Retrospective data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2012-2018 of patients with primary diagnosis of NSTI (gas gangrene, necrotizing faciitis, cutaneous gangrene, or Fournier gangrene) were identified for analysis. A 1:4 greedy match was performed and risk factors for in-hospital mortality and discharge disposition were examined. Continuous variables were assessed using t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Categorical variables were assessed using χ² and Fisher exact tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 6,608 patients were identified. Weighted, this represents 33,040 patients; 32,390 are in the no-mortality cohort and 650 in the mortality cohort. Advanced age group was a risk factor for both in-hospital mortality and morbidity, but not for discharge to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Having two or more comorbidities was a risk factor for mortality, morbidity, and discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Cancer, liver disease, and kidney disease were predictors of in-hospital mortality. Diabetes mellitus and kidney disease were predictors of experiencing an in-hospital complication. Diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and kidney disease were predictors for discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility. Conclusions: Necrotizing soft tissue infections are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at higher risk for mortality, morbidity, and higher level of care at discharge can help providers properly allocate resources to improve patient outcomes and reduce the financial burden on patients and healthcare facilities. Special attention should be paid to those with existing or acute kidney dysfunction because this was the only comorbidity associated with increased risk mortality, morbidity, and discharge to higher level of care.

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections of the Hand and Wrist

Necrotizing soft tissue infections of the upper extremity threaten life and limb. Their presentation is often difficult to recognize and multiple factors contribute to the varied presentation, speed of spread, and morbidity of the disease process. The only treatment to be definitively shown to improve outcomes is prompt surgical treatment. It should be expected to perform multiple debridements as well as reconstructive procedures once the infection and necrosis has been arrested. The use of a multidisciplinary team is mandatory to optimize care for these patients. Despite advances in knowledge and treatment, these infections still have high mortality and morbidity.

Outcomes of β-Hemolytic Streptococcal Necrotizing Skin and Soft-tissue Infections and the Impact of Clindamycin Resistance

BACKGROUND

β-Hemolytic streptococci are frequently implicated in necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs). Clindamycin administration may improve outcomes in patients with serious streptococcal infections. However, clindamycin resistance is growing worldwide, and resistance patterns in NSTIs and their impact on outcomes are unknown.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, patients with NSTI at a quaternary referral center were followed up for the outcomes of death, limb loss, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Surgical wound cultures and resistance data were obtained within 48 hours of admission as part of routine care. Risk ratios for the association between these outcomes and the presence of β-hemolytic streptococci or clindamycin-resistant β-hemolytic streptococci were calculated using log-binomial regression, controlling for age, transfer status, and injection drug use-related etiology.

RESULTS

Of 445 NSTIs identified, 85% had surgical wound cultures within 48 hours of admission. β-Hemolytic streptococci grew in 31%, and clindamycin resistance was observed in 31% of cultures. The presence of β-hemolytic streptococci was associated with greater risk of amputation (risk ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.01), as was the presence of clindamycin resistance among β-hemolytic streptococci infections (1.86; 1.10-3.16).

CONCLUSIONS

β-Hemolytic streptococci are highly prevalent in NSTIs, and in our population clindamycin resistance was more common than previously described. Greater risk of limb loss among patients with β-hemolytic streptococci-particularly clindamycin-resistant strains-may portend a more locally aggressive disease process or may represent preexisting patient characteristics that predispose to both infection and limb loss. Regardless, these findings may inform antibiotic selection and surgical management to maximize the potential for limb salvage.

Incidence and mortality of necrotizing fasciitis in The Netherlands: the impact of group A Streptococcus

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the exact incidence of necrotizing soft tissue infections. The few incidences reported in international literature are not directly relatable to the Netherlands, or other European countries, due to geographic heterogeneity in causative micro-organisms involved. This resulted in the aim of this study to map the incidence, mortality rate and hospital course of necrotizing fasciitis infections in the Netherlands to gain insight in the incidence of necrotizing fasciitis in the Netherlands and the associated mortality and health care burden.

METHODS

This nationwide retrospective database study used three distinct data sources to map the incidence of necrotizing fasciitis in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019, being data from the Dutch Hospital Data (DHD) foundation, data from Osiris-AIZ, which is a database of notifiable diseases managed by regional Public Health Services (GGD) and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), and previously published studies on necrotizing fasciitis conducted in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

The incidence of necrotizing fasciitis in the Netherlands is estimated to be approximately 1.1 to 1.4 cases per 100,000 person years, which corresponds to 193-238 patients per year. Of all necrotizing fasciitis infections, 34 to 42% are caused by the group A Streptococcus. Annually, 56 patients die as a result of a necrotizing fasciitis infection (mortality of 23-29%) and 26 patients undergo an amputation for source control (11-14%). Patients stay a mean of 6 to 7 days at the intensive care unit and have a mean hospital length of stay of 24 to 30 days.

CONCLUSION

The combination of nationwide databases provides reliable insight in the epidemiology of low-incidence and heterogenic diseases. In the Netherlands, necrotizing fasciitis is a rare disease with group A Streptococcus being the most common causative micro-organism of necrotizing fasciitis. The prior Dutch cohort studies on necrotizing fasciitis report slightly higher sample mortality rates, compared to the population mortality. However, necrotizing fasciitis remain associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, risk at amputation and health care burden characterized by prolonged ICU and hospital stay.

Factors Associated with Mortality Following Burns Complicated by Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

We reviewed studies with individual participant data of patients who sustained burn injury and subsequently developed necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTI). Characteristics and managements were compared between patients who lived and patients who died to determine factors associated with mortality. Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. PRISMA-IPD guidelines were followed throughout the review. Eligible patients sustained a burn injury, treated in any setting, and diagnosed with a NSTI following burn injury. Comparisons were made between burned patients who lived "non-mortality" and burned patients who died "mortality" following NSTI using non-parametric univariate analyses. Fifty-eight studies with 78 patients were published from 1970 through 2019. Non-mortality resulted in 58 patients and mortality resulted in 20 patients. Patients with mortality had significantly greater median %TBSA burned (45%[IQR:44-64%] versus 35%[IQR:11-59%],p=0.033), more intubations (79% versus 43%,p=0.013), less debridements (83% versus 98%,p=0.039), less skin excisions (83% versus 98%,p=0.039), more complications (100% versus 50%,p<0.001), management at a burn center (100% versus 71%,p=0.008), underwent less flap surgeries (5% versus 35%,p=0.014), less graft survival (25% versus 86%,p<0.001), and less healed wounds (5% versus 95%,p<0.001), compared to patients with non-mortality, respectively. Non-mortality patients had more debridements, skin excised, systemic antimicrobials, skin graft survival, flaps, improvement following surgery and healed wounds compared to mortality patients. Mortality patients had greater %TBSA burned, intubations, management at a burn center and complications compared to non-mortality patients.

Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Aspects

The term necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) encompasses a heterogenous group of patients with necrotizing infections, involving any body part. NSTI is diagnosed by surgical exploration, where necrosis of the subcutaneous tissue and/or muscle tissue, undermining of the skin, thrombosis of the superficial veins, and deliquescent tissue can be seen. Patients can present with vague symptoms, and approximately half of patients experience severe pain. The clinical presentation and microbiological etiology vary according to affected body site, with NSTI located to the extremities being dominated by monomicrobial group A streptococcal infections, and NSTI located to the anogenital area dominated by polymicrobial infections. No set of diagnostic criteria exists, and suspicion of the diagnosis should come from careful clinical examination and signs of local or systemic severity. Laboratory blood values show no distinct pattern but resemble those of sepsis. Imaging can aid the diagnostic process but must not delay surgical intervention.