The use of predefined scales and scores with eye-tracking devices for symptom identification in critically ill nonverbal patients

Feeling Trapped and Optimistic: Current Rather than Prospective Medical Conditions Dominate Self-Reported Emotions and Appraisals in Mechanically Ventilated Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Adverse medical conditions can involve present and expected future restrictions as a double burden: mechanically ventilated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), on the one hand, face pain and communication restrictions. On the other hand, they are confronted with significant changes in their future life perspective. While past research on emotion and appraisals has studied SCI patients alone or in comparison with healthy controls, the current work disentangles the potential impact of (a) the adverse current state and (b) expected future restrictions by comparing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with vs. without SCI in eye-tracking-based self-reports on emotions and appraisals. Results suggest that patients of either group could provide faceted accounts of their current state, such as feeling trapped and insecure. However, the feedback that SCI and other ICU patients gave was similar, suggesting that current adversities dominate self-reports.

Communication in critical care tracheostomy patients dependent upon cuff inflation: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to synthesise the evidence concerning communication in critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation. The aim was to identify the psychological impact on patients awake and alert with tracheostomies but unable to speak; strategies utilised to enable communication and facilitators and barriers for the success of these strategies.

REVIEW METHOD USED

This scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched from 1st January 2000 to 30th September 2023 and supplemented with hand searching of references from included studies.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were eligible if they addressed the psychological impact of voicelessness and/or the structure, process, and outcomes of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, in addition to facilitators and barriers to effectiveness. The population of interest included critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation, their families, and healthcare workers. Screening and data extraction were undertaken by two reviewers independently. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria: 11 were qualitative, nine were quantitative, and three were mixed-methods studies. Voicelessness elicited negative emotions, predominantly frustration. AAC systems, encompassing unaided and aided (low-tech and high-tech) methods, presented both advantages and drawbacks. High-tech strategies held promise for patients with physical limitations. Patients equally appreciated the support offered through unaided strategies, including eye contact and touch. Facilitating factors included speech therapy involvement and assessment. Patient-related challenges were the most frequent barriers.

CONCLUSION

Facilitating meaningful communication for critically ill tracheostomy patients dependent on cuff inflation is of paramount psychological significance. Whilst AAC systems are practicable, they are not without limitations, implying the absence of a universally applicable solution. This underscores the importance of continuous evaluation, reinforced by a multidisciplinary team.

REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTERED

27 July 2022.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework Registries: https://osf.io/kbrjn/.

Three patterns of symptom communication between patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit: A fieldwork study

AIM

To describe different patterns of communication aimed at preventing, identifying and managing symptoms between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit.

DESIGN

We conducted a fieldwork study with triangulation of participant observation and individual interviews.

METHODS

Participant observation of nine patients and 50 clinicians: nurses, physiotherapists and physicians. Subsequent individual face-to-face interviews with nine of the clinicians, and six of the patients after they had regained their ability to speak and breathe spontaneously, were fully alert and felt well enough to sit through the interview.

FINDINGS

Symptom communication was found to be an integral part of patient care. We identified three communication patterns: (1) proactive symptom communication, (2) reactive symptom communication and (3) lack of symptom communication. The three patterns co-existed in the cases and the first two complemented each other. The third pattern represents inadequate management of symptom distress.

CONCLUSION

Recognition of symptoms in non-speaking intensive care patients is an important skill for clinicians. Our study uncovered three patterns of symptom communication, two of which promoted symptom management. The third pattern suggested that clinicians did not always acknowledge the symptom distress.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Proactive and reactive symptom assessment of non-speaking patients require patient verification when possible. Improved symptom prevention, identification and management require a combination of sound clinical judgement and attentiveness towards symptoms, implementation and use of relevant assessment tools, and implementation and skill building in augmentative and alternative communication.

IMPACT

This study addressed the challenges of symptom communication between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit. Our findings may have an impact on patients and clinicians concerned with symptom management in intensive care units.

REPORTING METHOD

We used the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

A user representative was involved in the design of the study.

Perceptions of critically ill individuals with acute and chronic spinal cord injury requiring a tracheostomy tube

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the perceptions of patients requiring a tracheostomy tube and to identify possible different perceptions in critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes who have acute (ASCI) or chronic spinal cord injuries (CSCI).

SETTING

Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU) and intermediate care unit of the BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Germany.

METHODS

Patients who met the inclusion criteria completed a 25-item questionnaire on two consecutive days regarding their experiences and perceptions in breathing, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort of the tracheostomy tube.

RESULTS

A total of 51 persons with ASCI (n = 31) and CSCI (n = 20) were included with a mean age of 53 years. Individuals with ASCI reported significantly more frequent pain and swallowing problems as compared to individuals with CSCI (p ≤ 0.014) at initial assessment. There were no differences between ASCI and CSCI reported with respect to speaking and overall comfort.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to regularly assess the perceptions of critically ill patients with tracheostomy tubes with ASCI or CSCI in the daily ICU care routine. We were able to assess these perceptions in different categories. For the future, evaluating the perception of individuals with SCI and a tracheostomy should be implemented to their daily routine care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00022073.

Behavioral pain scale may not be reliable in awake non-verbal intensive care patients: a case control study

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of pain in patients, unable of oral communication, often relies on behavioral assessment. However, some critically ill patients, while non-verbal, are awake and have some potential for self-reporting. The objective was to compare the results of a behavioral pain assessment with self-reporting in awake, non-verbal, critically ill patients unable to use low-tech augmentative and alternative communication tools.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of intubated or tracheotomized adult, ventilated patients with a RASS (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) of -1 to + 1 and inadequate non-verbal communication skills in a surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care university hospital. For pain assessment, the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) was used. Self-reporting of pain was achieved by using an eye tracking device to evaluate the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the pain/discomfort item of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L (EQ-Pain). All measurements were taken at rest.

RESULTS

Data was collected from 75 patients. Neither the NRS nor the EQ-Pain (r < .15) correlated with the BPS. However, NRS and EQ-Pain were significantly correlated (r = .78, p = < 0.001), indicating the reliability of the self-reporting by these patients. Neither the duration of intubation/tracheostomy, nor cause for ICU treatment, nor BPS subcategories had an influence on these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral pain assessment tools in non-verbal patients who are awake and not in delirium appear unreliable in estimating pain during rest. Before a behavioral assessment tool such as the BPS is used, the application of high-tech AACs should be strongly considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register, Registration number: DRKS00021233. Registered 23 April 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00021233 .

Development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score in critically ill patients

PURPOSE

Little attention has been given to understanding the experiences and perceptions of tracheostomized patients. This study aimed to measure the impact of tracheostomy on well-being in critically ill patients with the development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score (TWBS).

METHODS

This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study including critically ill patients with a tracheostomy without delirium. A 25-item questionnaire with items from six categories (respiration, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort) was used to select the 12 best items (two per category) to form the TWBS score after testing on two consecutive days. Item selection secured (1) that there were no skewed response distributions, (2) high stability from day 1 to day 2, and (3) high prototypicality for the category in terms of item-total correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients with a mean age of 56 years were included. The 12 items of the TWBS were characterized by a high retest reliability (τ = 0.67-0.93) and acceptable internal consistency. The overlap with the clinician rating was low, suggesting that acquiring self-report data is strongly warranted.

CONCLUSION

With the TWBS, an instrument is available for the assessment of the subjective effects a tracheostomy has on in critically ill patients. The score potentially offers a chance to increase well-being of these patients. Additionally, this score could also increase their quality of life by improving tracheostomy and weaning management.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register Identifier DRKS00022073 (2020/06/02).