Emergency department crystalloid resuscitation of 1.5 L or more is associated with increased mortality in elderly and nonelderly trauma patients

Pushing advanced hemorrhage control interventions forward: Reducing prehospital mortality from traumatic hemorrhage through further adoption of effective military prehospital strategies

ABSTRACT

Advancements in military medicine have had profound impacts on civilian trauma care. The current practices in civilian prehospital care focus on providing limited interventions in the field and rapid transport to higher levels of care. Very few prehospital emergency medical services in the United States have the capability to provide prehospital blood transfusions or advanced hemorrhage control procedures for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. As such, prehospital mortality from hemorrhage remains high. The United States military has adopted the use of prehospital blood transfusions during recent combat operations in the Middle East to mitigate prehospital mortality. Additionally, select military surgical teams capable of providing damage-control surgery as close to the point of injury as possible have been used to decrease the time to lifesaving interventions. This review seeks to assess current practices in civilian prehospital care within the United States while evaluating recent military medical lessons learned on prehospital blood products and minimizing time to lifesaving interventions, to identify potential opportunities to reduce mortality in civilian prehospital trauma care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Factors associated with mortality among patients with penetrating non-compressible torso hemorrhage in South Africa: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Non-compressible torso haemorrhage (NCTH), resulting from penetrating trauma to the chest, abdomen, or pelvis, places patients at high risk of death. The objectives of this study are to characterize the injury profile of patients with penetrating NCTH who receive care within a tiered public trauma system in South Africa and to identify factors associated with mortality.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of clinical data collected from Sept-2021 through Dec-2023 across 6 hospitals, 4 ambulance bases, and 2 mortuaries in the Western Cape Province that form a cohesive trauma referral pathway. The study included patients age ≥18 years with penetrating NCTH who arrived at the hospital within 3 h and received blood products within 6 h of injury. NCTH was defined as Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 2 to chest, abdomen or pelvis, with a systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mm Hg. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modelling.

Results

There were 202 patients with penetrating NCTH; median age was 29 years, 94 % male, injured by stab wounds (66 %) and gunshot wounds (31 %). Most patients (85 %) sustained injuries to the chest, 33 % to the abdomen, and 1.5 % to the bony pelvis. In a multivariable logistic regression model, elevated Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS ≥7) (OR 4.45, 95 % CI 1.58-13.90), elevated New Injury Severity Score (NISS >25) (OR 4.35, 95 % CI 1.45-16.30), anatomic injury to the abdomen/pelvis (OR 2.76, 95 % CI 1.03-7.74), and receipt of acute airway intervention (OR 4.97, 95 % CI 1.94-13.20) were significantly associated with 7-day in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Among patients with penetrating injuries to the torso, high triage scores, high injury severity, early airway interventions, and penetrating abdominal trauma were associated with elevated mortality risk.

Assessment of Volume and Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Critically Ill Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate fluid resuscitation strategies including volume assessment measures, conservative versus aggressive fluid resuscitation, and multifocal fluid resuscitation protocols in critically ill geriatric trauma patients.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted across five databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest, Embase, and Cochrane.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included based on their relevance to volume assessment measures, conservative versus aggressive fluid resuscitation, and multifocal fluid resuscitation protocols in critically ill geriatric trauma patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest included mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, and in-hospital complications.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The initial query identified 1,257 studies, and after inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 14 studies were evaluated. On average, serum lactate levels above 2.5 mmol/L were found to be significantly associated with mortality. Conservative approaches to fluid resuscitation that were on average <1,500 cc were also found to decrease mortality and incur no increase in in-hospital complications. Additionally, goal-oriented geriatric fluid resuscitation protocols utilizing multiple measures for hemodynamic stability were found to reduce mortality in patients following the implementation of the protocol.

CONCLUSION

Serum lactate level kept on average below 2.5 mmol/L has shown to be an effective volume assessment measure and associated with decreased mortality. Additionally, conservative fluid resuscitation with volume maintained on average <15,000 cc was also associated with decreased mortality compared to aggressive fluid resuscitation measures. Lastly, goal-oriented geriatric fluid resuscitation protocols that aimed to maintain multiple volume assessment measures were associated with decreased mortality and complication rates. Implementation of these protocols has the potential to significantly improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Transfusion of Blood Products in Trauma - A Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP

Hemorrhagic shock remains the leading cause of potentially preventable death among injured patients with life-threatening bleeding. Prehospital resuscitation has been evolving with increasing use of blood product resuscitation. The impact of blood administration on patient outcomes remains poorly defined with significant heterogeneity in the quality of literature supporting prehospital blood product resuscitation after trauma. We completed a structured search of the literature using a rapid review framework based on three distinct PICO questions to develop systematic and consensus recommendations.

The National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP) recommends, in EMS agencies/systems that can support a high-quality prehospital blood transfusion program:Use of blood components over crystalloids for the first-line treatment of patients with traumatic life-threatening bleeding in the prehospital phase of resuscitationUse of low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) as the first-choice blood product for treatment of patients with traumatic life-threatening bleeding in the prehospital phase of resuscitationUse of a combination or composite of prehospital transfusion indications, focused on physiologic abnormalities and/or injury patterns with obvious significant blood loss.Use of active monitoring for transfusion-related adverse events.Developing a mechanism to recycle unused blood product units nearing their expiration date to a high-use hospital facility to minimize wastage.Engaging in a comprehensive longitudinal active collaboration between EMS agencies, trauma centers, and blood suppliers to ensure the success of a prehospital transfusion program.

Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma - a Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP

Fluid resuscitation choices in prehospital trauma care are limited, with most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies only having access to crystalloids. Which solution to use, how much to administer, and judging the individual risks and benefits of giving or withholding fluids remains an area of uncertainty. To address the role of crystalloid fluids in prehospital trauma care, we reviewed the available relevant literature and developed recommendations to guide clinical care. The topic of prehospital blood product administration is covered elsewhere.NAEMSP recommendsIsotonic crystalloid solutions should be the preferred fluids for use in prehospital trauma management. Specific choice of isotonic crystalloid solutions may be driven by medication compatibility and other operational issues.Permissive hypotension is reasonable in patients without traumatic brain injury (TBI).Avoiding or correcting hypotension in polytrauma patients with TBI may be a higher priority than restricting fluid use.Large volume crystalloid resuscitation should be generally avoided.Developing processes to administer warmed intravenous (IV) fluids is reasonable.Risks of IV fluid use, or restriction, in trauma resuscitation should be weighed against possible benefits.Strategies to reduce the need for IV fluids should be considered.A standard trauma resuscitation curriculum for prehospital providers should be developed to improve evidence-based delivery of IV fluids in trauma.

Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Management of the Entrapped Patient - a Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP

Entrapped patients may be simply entombed or experiencing crush injury or entanglement. Patients with trauma who are entrapped are at higher risk of significant injury than patients not entrapped. Limited access and prolonged scene times further complicate patient management. Although patient entrapment is a significant focus of specialty teams, such as urban search & rescue (US&R) teams that operate as local, regional, and/or national resources in response to complex scenes and disaster scenarios, entrapment is a regular occurrence in routine EMS response. Therefore, all EMS clinicians must have the training and skills to manage entrapped patients and to support medically-directed rescue throughout the extrication process. NAEMSP RECOMMENDSEMS clinicians must perform a timely and thorough primary and secondary assessment and reassessments in parallel with dynamic extrication planning; the environment may require adaption of standard assessment techniques and devices.EMS clinicians should establish early, clear, and ongoing communications with rescue personnel to ensure a coordinated patient-centered medically directed approach to extrication. Communication with the patient should be frequent, clear, and reassuring.EMS clinicians should immediately take measures to effectively prevent and manage hypothermia.EMS clinicians should recognize airway management in the entrapped patient is always challenging. When required, advanced airway placement should be performed by the most experienced operator with proficiency in multiple modalities and alternative techniques in limited access situations.In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should initiate large-volume (i.e., 1-1.5 L/h for adults and 20 mL/kg/h for pediatric patients for the initial 3-4 h) fluid resuscitation with crystalloid, preferably normal saline, as early as possible and prior to extrication.In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should administer medications to mitigate risks of hyperkalemia, infection, and renal failure, early and prior to extrication.Tourniquet application should be considered in the setting of the crushed extremity as a potential adjunct to medical optimization before extrication of some patients.Patients with prolonged entrapment with the potential for severe injuries require complex resuscitation and may benefit from EMS physician management on scene. EMS systems should consider an early EMS physician response to entrapped patients.

Causes and Timing of Unplanned ICU Admissions Among Trauma Patients at a Level 1 Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

Unexpected ICU admissions are a key quality metric in trauma care. The purpose of this study is to identify the most common causes of unplanned ICU admissions among trauma patients at an ACS-verified level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all trauma patients with unplanned admission to the ICU at a level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2021. Unplanned ICU admissions were categorized into (1) "bounce-backs," patients previously admitted to the ICU and (2) "upgrades," patients who had not previously been cared for in the ICU.

RESULTS

Of 300 unexpected ICU transfers, bounce-backs accounted for 69% and upgrades 31%. The most common injuries were traumatic brain injuries (40%) and rib fractures (41.3%). In-hospital mortality rate was 10% and did not significantly differ between bounce-backs and upgrades (12 vs 5%, P = .92). Respiratory distress was the most common cause of transfer (41.1%), followed by neurologic (29.6%) and cardiovascular decline (21.2%). Patients were on average 928 mL fluid positive 72 hours prior to transfer (t > 0, P < .0001), and 295 mL fluid positive in the 24 hours prior to transfer (t > 0, P .0003). Patients transferred for respiratory distress were no more fluid over-balanced than those transferred for other reasons.

CONCLUSION

We found a large percent of unplanned transfers occurring within 48 hours of admission or transfer out of the ICU suggesting under-triage as a leading cause of bounce-backs and upgrades. Respiratory distress was the leading cause of transfer. These findings highlight opportunities for targeted interventions.

Preventable deaths in hospitalized trauma patients

AIM

To study the preventable trauma deaths of hospitalized patients in the United Arab Emirates and to identify opportunities for improvement.

METHODS

We analyzed the Abu Dhabi Emirate Trauma Registry data of admitted patients who died in the emergency department or in hospital from 2014 to 2019. A panel of experts categorize the deaths into not preventable (NP), potentially preventable (PP), and definitely preventable (DP).

RESULTS

A total of 405 deaths were included, and 82.7% were males. The majority (89.1%) were NP, occurring mainly in the emergency department (40.4%) and the intensive care unit (49.9%). The combined potentially preventable and preventable death rate was 10.9%. The median (Interquartile range) age of the DP was 57.5 (37-76) years, compared with 32 (24-42) and 34 (25-55) years for NP and PP, respectively (p = 0.008). Most of the PP deaths occurred in the intensive care unit (55.6%), while the DP occurred mainly in the ward (50%). Falls accounted for 25% of PP and DP. Deficiencies in airway care, hemorrhage control, and fluid management were identified in 25%, 43.2% and 29.5% of the DP/PP deaths, respectively. Seventy-two percent of the Airway deficiencies occurred in the prehospital, while 34.1% of hemorrhage control deficiencies were in the emergency department. Fluid management deficiencies occurred in the emergency department and the operation theater.

CONCLUSIONS

DP and PP deaths comprised 10.9% of the deaths. Most of the DP occurred in the emergency department and ward. Prehospital Airway and in-hospital hemorrhage and excessive fluid were the main areas for opportunities for improvement.

[Prehospital management in trauma patients and the increasing number of helicopter EMS transportations : An epidemiological study of the TraumaRegister DGU®]

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

To compare the prehospital treatment modalities and intervention regimens for major trauma patients with comparable injury patterns between Austria and Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This analysis is based on data retrieved from the TraumaRegister DGU®. Data included severely injured trauma patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16, an age ≥ 16 years, and who were primarily admitted to an Austrian (n = 4186) or German (n = 41,484) level I trauma center (TC) from 2008 to 2017. Investigated endpoints included prehospital times and interventions performed until final hospital admission.

RESULTS

The cumulative time for transportation from the site of the accident to the hospital did not significantly differ between the countries (62 min in Austria, 65 min in Germany). Overall, 53% of all trauma patients in Austria were transported to the hospital with a helicopter compared to 37% in Germany (p < 0.001). The rate of intubation was 48% in both countries, the number of chest tubes placed (5.7% Germany, 4.9% Austria), and the frequency of administered catecholamines (13.4% Germany, 12.3% Austria) were comparable (Φ = 0.00). Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure, BP ≤ 90 mmHg) upon arrival in the TC was higher in Austria (20.6% vs. 14.7% in Germany; p < 0.001). A median of 500 mL of fluid was administered in Austria, whereas in Germany 1000 mL was infused (p < 0.001). Patient demographics did not reveal a relationship (Φ = 0.00) between both countries, and the majority of patients sustained a blunt trauma (96%). The observed ASA score of 3-4 was 16.8% in Germany versus 11.9% in Austria.

CONCLUSION

Significantly more helicopter EMS transportations (HEMS) were carried out in Austria. The authors suggest implementing international guidelines to explicitly use the HEMS system for trauma patients only a) for the rescue/care of people who have had an accident or are in life-threatening situations, b) for the transport of emergency patients with ISS > 16, c) for transportation of rescue or recovery personnel to hard to reach regions or, d) for the transport of medicinal products, especially blood products, organ transplants or medical devices.

Transfusion practice in Central Norway - a regional cohort study in patients suffering from major haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

In patients with major hemorrhage, balanced transfusions and limited crystalloid use is recommended in both civilian and military guidelines. This transfusion strategy is often applied in the non-trauma patient despite lack of supporting data. The aim of this study was to describe the current transfusion practice in patients with major hemorrhage of both traumatic and non-traumatic etiology in Central Norway, and discuss if transfusions are in accordance with appropriate massive transfusion protocols.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, data from four hospitals in Central Norway was collected from 01.01.2017 to 31.12.2018. All adults (≥18 years) receiving massive transfusion (MT) and alive on admission were included. MT was defined as transfusion of ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) within 24 hours, or ≥ 5 units of PRBC during the first 3 hours after admission to hospital. Clinical data was collected from the hospital blood bank registry (ProSang) and electronic patient charts (CareSuite PICIS). Patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were included in the study, of which 85.1% were non-trauma patients. Seventy-six per cent of all patients received plasma:PRBC in a ratio ≥ 1:2 (high ratio) and 59.2% of patients received platelets:PRBC in a ratio ≥ 1:2 (high ratio). 32.2% received a plasma:PRBC-ratio ≥ 1:1, and 23.6% platelet:PRBC-ratio ≥ 1:1. Median fluid infusion of crystalloids in all patients was 5750 mL. Thirty-seven per cent of all patients received tranexamic acid, 53.4% received calcium and fibrinogen concentrate was administered in 9.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients had a non-traumatic etiology. The majority was transfused with high ratios of plasma:PRBC and platelet:PRBC, but not in accordance with the aim of the local protocol (1:1:1). Crystalloids were administered liberally for both trauma and non-trauma patients. There was a lower use of hemostatic adjuvants than recommended in the local transfusion protocol. Awareness to local protocol should be increased.

Impact of Fluid Balance on Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay in Critically Ill Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

There is significant data in the medical and surgical literature supporting the correlations between positive volume balance and negative outcomes such as AKI, prolonged mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and increased mortality.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective chart review included adult patients identified from a Trauma Registry database. The primary outcome was the total ICU LOS. Secondary outcomes include hospital LOS, ventilator-free days, incidence of compartment syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), renal replacement therapy (RRT), and days of vasopressor therapy.

RESULTS

In general, baseline characteristics were similar between groups with the exception of mechanism of injury, FAST exam, and disposition from the ED. The ICU LOS was shortest in the negative fluid balance and longest in the positive fluid balance group (4 days vs 6 days, P = .001). Hospital LOS was also shorter in the negative balance group than that of the positive balance group (7 days vs 12 days, P < .001). More patients in the positive balance group experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome compared to the negative balance group (6.3% vs 0%, P = .004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of renal replacement therapy, days of vasopressor therapy, or ventilator-free days.

DISCUSSION

A negative fluid balance at seventy-two hours was associated with a shorter ICU and hospital LOS in critically ill trauma patients. Our observed correlation between positive volume balance and total ICU days merits further exploration with prospective, comparative studies of lower volume resuscitation to key physiologic endpoints compared with routine standard of care.

The volume of infusion fluids correlates with treatment outcomes in critically ill trauma patients

Background

Appropriate fluid management is essential in the treatment of critically ill trauma patients. Both insufficient and excessive fluid volume can be associated with worse outcomes. Intensive fluid resuscitation is a crucial element of early resuscitation in trauma; however, excessive fluid infusion may lead to fluid accumulation and consequent complications such as pulmonary edema, cardiac failure, impaired bowel function, and delayed wound healing. The aim of this study was to examine the volumes of fluids infused in critically ill trauma patients during the first hours and days of treatment and their relationship to survival and outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively screened records of all consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the beginning of 2019 to the end of 2020. All adults who were admitted to ICU after trauma and were hospitalized for a minimum of 2 days were included in the study. We used multivariate regression analysis models to assess a relationship between volume of infused fluid or fluid balance, age, ISS or APACHE II score, and mortality. We also compared volumes of fluids in survivors and non-survivors including additional analyses in subgroups depending on disease severity (ISS score, APACHE II score), blood loss, and age.

Results

A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The volume of infused fluids and fluid balance were positively correlated with mortality, complication rate, time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU, INR, and APTT. Fluid volumes were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors at the end of the second day of ICU stay (2.77 vs. 2.14 ml/kg/h) and non-survivors had a highly positive fluid balance (6.21 compared with 2.48 L in survivors).

Conclusion

In critically ill trauma patients, worse outcomes were associated with higher volumes of infusion fluids and a more positive fluid balance. Although fluid resuscitation is lifesaving, especially in the first hours after trauma, fluid infusion should be limited to a necessary minimum to avoid fluid overload and its negative consequences.

Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Digestives Diseases and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis on massive nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding and direct-acting oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

there is limited experience and understanding of massive nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding during therapy with direct-acting oral anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVES

to provide evidenced-based definitions and recommendations.

METHODS

a consensus document developed by the Spanish Society of Digestives Diseases and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis using modified Delphi methodology. A panel was set up of 24 gastroenterologists with experience in gastrointestinal bleeding, and consensus building was assessed over three rounds. Final recommendations are based on a systematic review of the literature using the GRADE system.

RESULTS

panelist agreement was 91.53 % for all 30 items as a group, a percentage that was improved during rounds 2 and 3 for items where clinical experience is lower. Explicit disagreement was only 1.25 %. A definition of massive nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants was established, and recommendations to optimize this condition's management were developed.

CONCLUSION

the approach to these critically ill patients must be multidisciplinary and protocolized, optimizing decisions for an early identification of the condition and patient stabilization according to the tenets of damage control resuscitation. Thus, consideration must be given to immediate anticoagulation reversal, preferentially with specific antidotes (idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for direct factor Xa inhibitors); hemostatic resuscitation, and bleeding point identification and management.

A simple and novel equation to estimate the degree of bleeding in haemorrhagic shock: mathematical derivation and preliminary in vivo validation

Determining blood loss [100% – RBV (%)] is challenging in the management of haemorrhagic shock. We derived an equation estimating RBV (%) via serial haematocrits (Hct₁, Hct₂) by fixing infused crystalloid fluid volume (N) as [0.015 × body weight (g)]. Then, we validated it in vivo. Mathematically, the following estimation equation was derived: RBV (%) = 24k / [(Hct₁ / Hct₂) – 1]. For validation, non-ongoing haemorrhagic shock was induced in Sprague–Dawley rats by withdrawing 20.0%–60.0% of their total blood volume (TBV) in 5.0% intervals (n = 9). Hct₁ was checked after 10 min and normal saline N cc was infused over 10 min. Hct₂ was checked five minutes later. We applied a linear equation to explain RBV (%) with 1 / [(Hct₁ / Hct₂) – 1]. Seven rats losing 30.0%–60.0% of their TBV suffered shock persistently. For them, RBV (%) was updated as 5.67 / [(Hct₁ / Hct₂) – 1] + 32.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] of the slope: 3.14–8.21, p = 0.002, R² = 0.87). On a Bland-Altman plot, the difference between the estimated and actual RBV was 0.00 ± 4.03%; the 95% CIs of the limits of agreements were included within the pre-determined criterion of validation (< 20%). For rats suffering from persistent, non-ongoing haemorrhagic shock, we derived and validated a simple equation estimating RBV (%). This enables the calculation of blood loss via information on serial haematocrits under a fixed N. Clinical validation is required before utilisation for emergency care of haemorrhagic shock.

Association between prehospital fluid resuscitation with crystalloids and outcome of trauma patients in Asia by a cross-national multicenter cohort study

Prehospital fluid resuscitation with crystalloids in patients following trauma remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between prehospital fluid resuscitation and outcomes of trauma patients in Asia. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trauma patients between 2016 and 2018 using data from the Pan-Asia Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) database. Prehospital fluid resuscitation was defined as any administration of intravenous crystalloid fluid on the ambulance before arrival to hospitals. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes, defined as Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to equalize potential prognostic factors in both groups. This study included 31,735 patients from six countries in Asia, and 4318 (13.6%) patients had ever received prehospital fluid resuscitation. The patients receiving prehospital fluid resuscitation had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32–3.10, p = 0.001 in PSM analysis. Prehospital fluid resuscitation was also associated with poor functional outcomes, with an OR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.48–2.03, p < 0.001 in PSM analysis. Prehospital fluid resuscitation in patients with major trauma (injury severity score ≥ 16) presented a higher risk of poor functional outcomes (aOR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.89–3.73 in PSM analysis, p_interaction = 0.006) via subgroup analysis. Prehospital fluid resuscitation of trauma patients is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcomes in the subgroup in countries studied.

Massive Transfusion Activations in Non-Trauma Patients

Introduction

Massive transfusion activations (MTAs) are commonly used in the care of the trauma patient. However, MTA for trauma patients constitutes only a small fraction of MpTA at our institution. The aim of this study was to characterize MTA in non-trauma patients to better understand how this strategy is employed at a larger tertiary hospital.

Methods

All MTA involving non-trauma patients from January 2017 to April 2019 were reviewed. Patients with unclear indications for MTA were excluded. Data collected included patient demographics, reason for MTA, transfusion ratios, use of adjunctive antifibrinolytics, use of viscoelastic testing, and vasopressor administration at the time of MTA.

Results

There were 328 patients and 353 MTA identified over the study period. The mean age was 52.0 years and 40.9% were male. Patients were most commonly under the care of a medical service (55.2%), while 25.3% were obstetric patients and 19.5% were surgical patients. Compliance with 1:1:1 transfusion ratios was low. Concomitant vasopressor use was high (70.8%), while antifibrinolytic agents (13.0%) and viscoelastic testing (19.0%) were used less commonly. The overall mortality of the study population was 56.1%.

Conclusions

Massive transfusion activations are frequently used in non-trauma patients. There was a low rate of adherence to 1:1:1 transfusion ratios as well as utilization of adjuncts and tools that could allow for targeted resuscitation. Understanding practice patterns relating to MTA may allow for an opportunity for improvement.

Acute intensive care unit resuscitation of severely injured trauma patients: Do we need a new strategy?

BACKGROUND

Unlike recent advances in blood product resuscitation, intravenous crystalloid (IVF) use after intensive care unit (ICU) admission in hemorrhagic shock has received less attention and current recommendations are based on limited evidence. To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to determine associations between IVF administration during acute ICU resuscitation and outcomes. We hypothesized that larger IVF volumes are associated with worse outcomes.

METHODS

We linked our trauma registry with electronic health record data (2012-2015) to identify adults with an initial lactate level of ≥4 mmol/L and documented lactate normalization (≤2 mmol/L), excluding those with isolated head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3. We focused on the period from ICU admission to lactate normalization, analyzing duration, volume of IVF, and proportion of volume as 1-L boluses. We used linear regression to determine associations with ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors, and logistic regression to identify associations with acute kidney injury and home discharge while adjusting for important covariates.

RESULTS

We included 337 subjects. Median time to lactate normalization was 15 hours (interquartile range, 7-25 hours), and median IVF volume was 3.7 L (interquartile range, 1.5-6.4 L). The fourfold difference between the upper and lower quartiles of both duration and volume remained after stratifying by injury severity. Hourly volumes tapered over time but persistently aggregated at 0.5 and 1 L, with 167 subjects receiving at least one 0.5-L bolus for 6 hours after ICU admission. Administration of larger volumes was associated with longer ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, as well as acute kidney injury.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variation in volume administered during acute ICU resuscitation, both absolutely and temporally, despite accounting for injury severity. Administration of larger volumes during acute ICU resuscitation is associated with worse outcomes. There is an opportunity to improve outcomes by further investigating and standardizing this important phase of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? The implementation and outcomes of a whole blood program in Ecuador

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhagic shock is a major cause of mortality in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many institutions in LMICs lack the resources to adequately prescribe balanced resuscitation. This study aims to describe the implementation of a whole blood (WB) program in Latin America and to discuss the outcomes of the patients who received WB.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients resuscitated with WB from 2013 to 2019. Five units of O+ WB were made available on a consistent basis for patients presenting in hemorrhagic shock. Variables collected included gender, age, service treating the patient, units of WB administered, units of components administered, admission vital signs, admission hemoglobin, shock index, Revised Trauma Score in trauma patients, intraoperative crystalloid (lactated Ringer's or normal saline) and colloid (5% human albumin) administration, symptoms of transfusion reaction, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The sample includes a total of 101 patients, 57 of which were trauma and acute care surgery patients and 44 of which were obstetrics and gynecology patients. No patients developed symptoms consistent with a transfusion reaction. The average shock index was 1.16 (±0.55). On average, patients received 1.66 (±0.80) units of WB. Overall mortality was 13.86% (14 of 101) in the first 24 hours and 5.94% (6 of 101) after 24 hours.

DISCUSSION

Implementing a WB protocol is achievable in LMICs. WB allows for more efficient delivery of hemostatic resuscitation and is ideal for resource-restrained settings. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a WB program implemented in a civilian hospital in Latin America.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Massive Transfusion in trauma: an evolving paradigm

A considerable amount of literature has nurtured the idea that massive transfusion is an independent trauma disease and therapeutic tool. In this opinion paper, the authors expose the evolution and challenge the classic paradigm and historic definition of massive transfusion. Based on current evidence the elements of an evolving strategy in transfusion management and bleeding control are exposed such as use of tranexamic acid, combination and ratios of blood products, use of fluids and viscoelastic testing. The synergy of these elements provides the basis to develop updated strategies and perspectives for transfusion management after trauma and to consider a classic definition of massive transfusion as outdated or the need for massive transfusion as failure. An alternative concept, Time Critical Transfusion may be better placed to take into account modern transfusion management after trauma.

The effect of prehospital intravenous access in traumatic shock: a Japanese nationwide cohort study

Aim

We aimed to evaluate effect of prehospital intravenous (IV) access on mortality in traumatic shock using a large nationwide dataset.

Methods

We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank to identify adults (≥18 years) with a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg at the trauma scene and were directly transported to the hospital between 2010 and 2019. We compared patients who had prehospital IV access (IV (+)) or not (IV (−)), using propensity score‐matched analysis, and 1:1 nearest‐neighbor matching without replacement. Standardized mean difference was used to evaluate the match balance between the two matched groups; a standardized mean difference >0.1 was considered a significant imbalance. Primary outcome was 72‐h mortality.

Results

Propensity scores matching generated 479 pairs from 5,857 patients. No significant between group differences occurred in 72‐h mortality (7.8 versus 8.8%; difference, −1.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.5–4.5%), 28‐day mortality (11.8 versus 11.3%; 95% CI: −4.6–3.6%), blood transfusion administration within 24 h (55.3 versus 49.1%; 95% CI: −0.1–12.6%), prehospital time (56.3 versus 53.0 min; 95% CI: −1.8–8.4 min), and cardiopulmonary arrest on hospital arrival (1.3 versus 1.3%; 95% CI: −1.4–1.4%). However, significantly higher systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival was found in the IV (+) than in the IV (−) group (104.6 versus 100.1 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.3‐8.7 mm Hg).

Conclusion

We found no significant effect of establishing IV access in the prehospital setting on survival outcomes of patients with traumatic shock.

Survey of group A plasma and low-titer group O whole blood use in trauma resuscitation at adult civilian level 1 trauma centers in the US

BACKGROUND

Recently revisited products like low-titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) and novel applications of group A as a universal donor of plasma are being used for trauma resuscitation. A survey of American Level 1 trauma centers was performed to elucidate the extent to which these products are currently employed.

METHODS

A survey was written that probed into the current use of blood products in trauma resuscitation with specific emphasis on LTOWB and group A plasma. A list of adult civilian Level 1 trauma centers in the continental USA was obtained from two public surgery and trauma focused websites. An email was then sent to each center's transfusion service medical director or laboratory manager providing them with a link to the online survey.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 103/187 (55%) adult civilian Level 1 trauma centers. For the resuscitation of trauma patients, group A plasma was used at 94/103 (91%) centers, while LTOWB was used at 43/103 (42%) centers. There were 39/103 (38%) centers that used both products. At 62/94 (66%) of the centers that used group A plasma, there was no limit on the number of units that could be administered, while an unlimited number of LTOWB units could be used at 5/43 (12%) of the centers that used LTOWB. RhD-positive LTOWB could be transfused to RhD-negative or RhD-type unknown females of childbearing potential at 22/43 (51%) of centers.

CONCLUSION

The use of group A plasma and LTOWB in trauma is increasing at American Level 1 trauma centers.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation Improves Survival in a Murine Model of Combined Hemorrhage and Burn Injury

INTRODUCTION

Combined burn injury and hemorrhagic shock are a common cause of injury in wounded warfighters. Current protocols for resuscitation for isolated burn injury and isolated hemorrhagic shock are well defined, but the optimal strategy for combined injury is not fully established. Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been shown to improve survival in rats after hemorrhagic shock, but its role in a combined burn/hemorrhage injury is unknown. We hypothesized that DPR would improve survival in mice subjected to combined burn injury and hemorrhage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male C57/BL6J mice aged 8 weeks were subjected to a 7-second 30% total body surface area scald in a 90°C water bath. Following the scald, mice received DPR with 1.5 mL normal saline or 1.5 mL peritoneal dialysis solution (Delflex). Control mice received no peritoneal solution. Mice underwent a controlled hemorrhage shock via femoral artery cannulation to a systolic blood pressure of 25 mm Hg for 30 minutes. Mice were then resuscitated to a target blood pressure with either lactated Ringer's (LR) or a 1:1 ratio of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Mice were observed for 24 hours following injury.

RESULTS

Median survival time for mice with no DPR was 1.47 hours in combination with intravascular LR resuscitation and 2.08 hours with 1:1 pRBC:FFP. Median survival time significantly improved with the addition of intraperitoneal normal saline or Delflex. Mice that received DPR followed by 1:1 pRBC:FFP required less intravascular volume than mice that received DPR with LR, pRBC:FFP alone, and LR alone. Intraperitoneal Delflex was associated with higher levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha and lower levels of interleukin 10 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein. Intraperitoneal normal saline resulted in less lung injury 1 hour postresuscitation, but increased to similar severity of Delflex at 4 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

After a combined burn injury and hemorrhage, DPR leads to increased survival in mice. Survival was similar with the use of normal saline or Delflex. DPR with normal saline reduced the inflammatory response seen with Delflex and delayed the progression of acute lung injury. DPR may be a valuable strategy in the treatment of patients with combined burn injury and hemorrhage.

Evolving concepts and strategies in the management of polytrauma patients

Major trauma is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in young adults. The impact of disability on the quality of life and functionality in this younger population is worrisome. This remains a major public health concern across the globe. Immediate and early deaths account for nearly 80% of trauma deaths occurring within the first few hours of injury to the first few days, usually because of traumatic brain injury or major exsanguination and subsequently due to shock or hypoxia. Worldwide adoption of comprehensive trauma systems and evolving models of trauma care including prehospital interventions have led improvements in trauma and critical care over the last few decades. Resuscitation and damage control orthopaedics are two key pillars in the management of polytrauma patient. Trauma-related coagulopathy can be an emerging complication during resuscitation of such patients which should be recognized early so appropriate corrective measures can be undertaken. We describe the evolving models of care in the management of polytrauma and trauma associated coagulopathy.

Whole blood for blood loss: hemostatic resuscitation in damage control

Hemorrhagic shock and its complications are a major cause of death among trauma patients. The management of hemorrhagic shock using a damage control resuscitation strategy has been shown to decrease mortality and improve patient outcomes. One of the components of damage control resuscitation is hemostatic resuscitation, which involves the replacement of lost blood volume with components such as packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, and platelets in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. However, this is a strategy that is not applicable in many parts of Latin America and other low-and-middle-income countries throughout the world, where there is a lack of well-equipped blood banks and an insufficient availability of blood products. To overcome these barriers, we propose the use of cold fresh whole blood for hemostatic resuscitation in exsanguinating patients. Over 6 years of experience in Ecuador has shown that resuscitation with cold fresh whole blood has similar outcomes and a similar safety profile compared to resuscitation with hemocomponents. Whole blood confers many advantages over component therapy including, but not limited to the transfusion of blood with a physiologic ratio of components, ease of transport and transfusion, less volume of anticoagulants and additives transfused to the patient, and exposure to fewer donors. Whole blood is a tool with reemerging potential that can be implemented in civilian trauma centers with optimal results and less technical demand.

Damage control resuscitation

The United States Navy originally utilized the concept of damage control to describe the process of prioritizing the critical repairs needed to return a ship safely to shore during a maritime emergency. To pursue a completed repair would detract from the goal of saving the ship. This concept of damage control management in crisis is well suited to the care of the critically ill trauma patient, and has evolved into the standard of care. Damage control resuscitation is not one technique, but, rather, a group of strategies which address the lethal triad of coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia. In this article, we describe this approach to trauma resuscitation and the supporting evidence base.

Reducing AB plasma utilisation through the AB plasma appropriateness index

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesised that there was inappropriate group AB plasma used in our hospital, identifiable by a novel key quality indicator (KQI) and mitigable through massive transfusion protocol (MTP) modification.

BACKGROUND

Group AB plasma is a scarce resource strained by increasing usage worldwide when used as universal donor plasma in non-group AB patients. To reduce inappropriate use and to promote benchmarking to the best practice, we developed the AB plasma appropriateness index (ABAI). ABAI is the ratio of AB plasma transfused to group AB or unknown blood group patients to all AB plasma utilised, where values closer to 1 are better.

METHODS

Data collected included AB plasma disposition by blood group, indications for transfusion, total blood utilisation, patient clinical characteristics and outcomes. ABAI during a 12-month period was retrospectively assessed, which led to implementation of pre-thawed group A plasma instead of group AB plasma for trauma patients starting in July 2017.

RESULTS

The ABAI retrospectively showed inappropriate use in non-group AB patients in our hospital, the majority used to avoid expiry after thaw. When comparing 1-year pre- and post-implementation periods, ABAI improved from 0·464 to 0·900 (P < 0·0001). After exclusion of therapeutic plasma exchange, ABAI still improved (0·486-0·720, P < 0·0001). No differences in the length of stay or mortality associated in 32 patients receiving group A plasma for emergency release were observed.

CONCLUSION

The ABAI is a novel KQI to indicate inappropriate AB plasma usage for quality improvement. This led to thawed A plasma use for MTPs, reducing inappropriate AB plasma usage.

Whole blood mitigates the acute coagulopathy of trauma and avoids the coagulopathy of crystalloid resuscitation

INTRODUCTION

The contributions of type and timing of fluid resuscitation to coagulopathy in trauma remain controversial. As part of a multifunctional resuscitation fluid research effort, we sought to further characterize the coagulation responses to resuscitation, specifically as compared to whole blood. We hypothesized that early whole blood administration mitigates the acute coagulopathy of trauma by avoiding the coagulopathy of CR resuscitation.

METHODS

Anesthetized rhesus macaques underwent polytraumatic, hemorrhagic shock, then a crossover study design resuscitation (n = 6 each) with either whole blood first (WB-1st) followed by crystalloid (CR); or CR-1st followed by WB. Resuscitation strategies were the following: WB-1st received 50% shed blood in 30minutes, followed by twice the shed blood volume (SBV) of CR over 30minutes and one times the SBV CR over 60minutes, where CR-1st received twice the SBV of CR over 30minutes, followed by 50% of shed blood in 30minutes, and one times the SBV CR over 60minutes. Blood samples were collected at baseline, end-of-shock, end-of-first and end-of-second resuscitation stages, and end-of-resuscitation for assessment (thromboelastometry, platelet aggregation, and plasmatic coagulation factors). Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way analysis of variance ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and t-tests; significance was at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Survival, blood loss, hemodynamics, and shock duration were equivalent between the groups. Compared to baseline, parameters measured at first and second resuscitation stage time points directly following CR infusion revealed abnormalities in thromboelastometry (clot formation time, α angle, and maximum clot firmness), platelet aggregation response (to collagen, arachidonic acid, and adenosine diphosphate), and plasmatic coagulation (prothrombin time, anti-thrombin 3, and fibrinogen), while whole blood infusion resulted in stabilization or correction of these parameters following its administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in the setting of trauma and hemorrhagic shock, the coagulation alterations begin before intervention/resuscitation; however, these are significantly aggravated by CR resuscitation and could perhaps be best termed acute coagulopathy of resuscitation.

STUDY TYPE

Translational animal model.

The Dead Sea needs salt water… massively bleeding patients need whole blood: The evolution of blood product resuscitation

Whole blood, that is blood that is not manufactured into its component red blood cells (RBC) plasma, and platelets (PLT) units, was the mainstay of transfusion for many years until it was discovered that the component parts of a blood donation could be stored under different conditions thereby optimizing the storage length of each product. The use of low anti-A and -B titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) has recently been rediscovered for use in massively bleeding trauma patients. Whole blood has several advantages over conventional component therapy for these patients, including simplifying the logistics of the resuscitation, being more concentrated than whole blood that is reconstituted from conventional components, and providing cold-stored PLTs, amongst other benefits. While randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of using LTOWB in the resuscitation of massively bleeding trauma patients are currently underway, retrospective data has shown that massively bleeding recipients of LTOWB with traumatic injury do not have worse outcomes compared to patients who received conventional components and, in some cases, recipients of LTOWB have more favourable outcomes. This paper will describe some of the advantages of using LTOWB and will discuss the emerging evidence for its use in massively bleeding patients.

Endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC) versus resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a swine model of hemorrhage and ischemia reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is effective at limiting hemorrhage from noncompressible sources and restoring but causes progressive distal ischemia, supraphysiologic pressures, and increased cardiac afterload. Endovascular variable aortic control (EVAC) addresses these limitations, while still controlling hemorrhage. Previous work demonstrated improved outcomes following a 90-minute intervention period in an uncontrolled hemorrhage model. The present study compares automated EVAC to REBOA over an occlusion period reflective of contemporary REBOA usage.

METHODS

Following instrumentation, 12 Yorkshire-cross swine underwent controlled 25% hemorrhage, a 45-minute intervention period of EVAC or REBOA, and subsequent resuscitation with whole blood and critical care for the remainder of a 6-hour experiment. Hemodynamics were acquired continuously, and laboratory parameters were assessed at routine intervals. Tissue was collected for histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

No differences were seen in baseline parameters. During intervention, EVAC resulted in more physiologic proximal pressure augmentation compared with REBOA (101 vs. 129 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 105-151 mm Hg; p = 0.04). During critical care, EVAC animals required less than half the amount of crystalloid (3,450 mL; 95% CI, 1,215-5,684 mL] vs. 7,400 mL [95% CI, 6,148-8,642 mL]; p < 0.01) and vasopressors (21.5 ng/kg [95% CI, 7.5-35.5 ng/kg] vs. 50.5 ng/kg [95% CI, 40.5-60.5 ng/kg]; p = 0.05) when compared with REBOA animals. Endovascular variable aortic control resulted in lower peak and final lactate levels. Endovascular variable aortic control animals had less aortic hyperemia from reperfusion with aortic flow rates closer to baseline (36 mL/kg per minute [95% CI, 30-44 mL/kg per minute] vs. 51 mL/kg per minute [95% CI, 41-61 mL/kg per minute]; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For short durations of therapy, EVAC produces superior hemodynamics and less ischemic insult than REBOA in this porcine-controlled hemorrhage model, with improved outcomes during critical care. This study suggests EVAC is a viable strategy for in-hospital management of patients with hemorrhagic shock from noncompressible sources. Survival studies are needed to determine if these early differences persist over time.

Is prehospital blood transfusion effective and safe in haemorrhagic trauma patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Life-threatening haemorrhage accounts for 40% mortality in trauma patients worldwide. After bleeding control is achieved, circulating volume must be restored. Early in-hospital transfusion of blood components is already proven effective, but the scientific proof for the effectiveness of prehospital blood-component transfusion (PHBT) in trauma patients is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence for effectiveness and safety of PHBT to haemorrhagic trauma patients.

METHODS

CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Pubmed were searched in the period from 1988 until August 1, 2018. Meta-analysis was performed for matched trauma patients receiving PHBT with the primary outcomes 24-hour mortality and long-term mortality. Secondary outcome measure was adverse events as a result of PHBT.

RESULTS

Trauma patients who received PHBT with simultaneous use of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and plasma showed a statistically significant reduction in long-term mortality (OR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.71; P < 0.0001) but no difference in 24-hour mortality (OR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.17-1.34; P = 0.16). PHBT with individual use of pRBCs showed no difference in long-term mortality (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.49; P =  0.17) or 24-hour mortality (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.46-1.85; P =  0.82). In a total of 1341 patients who received PHBT, 14 adverse events were reported 1.04%, 95% CI 0.57-1.75%.

CONCLUSIONS

PHBT with simultaneous use of both pRBCs and plasma resulted in a significant reduction in the odds for long-term mortality. However, based on mainly poor quality evidence no hard conclusion can be drawn about a possible survival benefit for haemorrhagic trauma patients receiving PHBT. Overall, PHBT is safe but results of currently ongoing randomised controlled trials have to be awaited to demonstrate a survival benefit.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aggressive crystalloid adversely affects outcomes in a pediatric trauma population

INTRODUCTION

Crystalloid resuscitation for trauma patients is deleterious, and minimizing crystalloid use is advocated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adverse effects of high-volume resuscitation in pediatric blunt trauma patients.

METHODS

This study included a retrospective review of 291 patients with blunt trauma from January 2007 to Apr 2018 at the Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University. Patients were dichotomized into low and high groups depending on the average dose of crystalloid fluid administration with a cut-off point during the first 24 or 48 h. Propensity score matching was used based on measurable baseline factors to minimize confounding. The associations between crystalloid administration and clinical outcomes were determined according to the corresponding methods.

RESULTS

Patients who received larger doses of crystalloids were more likely than the low-volume group to be associated with severe anemia (p = 0.033, p = 0.042, respectively), RBC transfusion (p = 0.016, p = 0.009, respectively) and longer hospital length of stay (p = 0.008, p = 0.002, respectively). In terms of plasma transfusion and oral solid diet, there were marginally significant differences noted in the dichotomized groups at 24 h (p = 0.074), with significant differences at 48 h (p =  0.013).

CONCLUSION

Significant unfavorable outcomes were noted following excessive crystalloid resuscitation within the first 48 h among pediatric patients with blunt trauma. Our findings support the notion that excessive fluid resuscitation should be avoided.

Damage Control Resuscitation in polytrauma patient

Haemorrhagic shock is one of the main causes of mortality in severe polytrauma patients. To increase the survival rates, a combined strategy of treatment known as Damage Control has been developed. The aims of this article are to analyse the actual concept of Damage Control Resuscitation and its three treatment levels, describe the best transfusion strategy, and approach the acute coagulopathy of the traumatic patient as an entity. The potential changes of this therapeutic strategy over the coming years are also described.

In silico model of the dilutional effects of conventional component therapy versus whole blood in the management of massively bleeding adult trauma patients

BACKGROUND

There are multiple approaches to the blood product and fluid resuscitation of a bleeding trauma patient. An in silico model of different trauma resuscitation strategies was constructed to predict their effects on the volumes of the different body fluid compartments and on several important hemostatic factors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This multicompartment dynamic deterministic model comprised four interconnected modules (hemostatic, resuscitation, body fluid compartment, and dilutional coagulopathy). The model was divided into five resuscitation phases with simulations using six different resuscitation strategies: whole blood (WB) only, conventional component therapy (CCT) only or 10 units of WB followed by CCT, with either 1 L of crystalloid or 1.5 units of WB or red blood cells in the prehospital phase.

RESULTS

At the end of the simulations using 1 L of crystalloid fluids in the prehospital resuscitation phase, the use of WB led to a 1.4 g/dL higher hemoglobin concentration, 32 mg/dL higher fibrinogen concentration, and 0.9 L lower total extracellular fluid volume compared to CCT. Prehospital blood product transfusion in place of crystalloid resulted in higher hemoglobin and fibrinogen concentrations and a lower international normalized ratio throughout the resuscitation regardless of the resuscitation strategy used. Throughout both the prehospital crystalloid and prehospital blood product transfusion simulations, the hemoglobin and fibrinogen concentrations and platelet counts were higher, and the international normalized ratio was lower, when WB was used compared to CCT.

CONCLUSIONS

This model predicted improved hemostatic factor levels and a smaller total extracellular fluid volume volume when WB was transfused instead of CCT to bleeding trauma patients.

Crystalloid resuscitation in trauma patients: deleterious effect of 5L or more in the first 24h

BACKGROUND

Over-aggressive intravenous fluid therapy with crystalloids has adverse effects in trauma patients. We assessed the role of large-volume (≥5l) administration of crystalloids within 24h of injury as an independent risk-factor for mortality, in-hospital complications, and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of adult trauma patients admitted to a level 1-trauma center between December 2011 and December 2012. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory values, and total resuscitation fluid administered within the first 24h of injury were obtained. Outcomes included mortality, in-hospital complications and ventilator-days. Multivariable logistic regression and Poisson regression analyses were performed to investigate any association between the administration of ≥5L crystalloids with the aforementioned outcomes while controlling for selected clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 970 patients were included in the analysis. 264 (27%) received ≥5L of crystalloids in the first 24h of injury. 118 (12%) had in-hospital complications and 337 (35%) required mechanical ventilation. The median age was 46 years (interquartile range (IQR) 27-65) years and 73% (n = 708) were males. The median injury severity score (ISS) was 17 (IQR 9-25). Overall mortality rate was 7% (n = 67). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed several variables independently associated with mortality (p < 0.05), including resuscitation with ≥5L crystalloid in the first 24h (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.55), older age (aOR 1.03), higher ISS (aOR 1.09), and lower temperature (aOR 0.68). The variables independently associated with in-hospital complications (p < 0.05) were older age, longer ICU stay, and platelet transfusion within 24h of the injury. Need for mechanical ventilation was more common in patients who received ≥5L crystalloids (RR 2.31) had higher ISS (RR 1.02), developed in-hospital complications (RR 1.91) and had lower presenting temperature (RR 0.87).

CONCLUSION

Large-volume crystalloid resuscitation is associated with increased mortality and longer time ventilated, but not with in-hospital complications such as pneumonia and sepsis. Based on this data, we recommend judicious use of crystalloids in the resuscitation of trauma patients.

Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion (MT) is a lifesaving treatment for trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock, assessed by Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score based on mechanism of injury, systolic blood pressure (SBP), tachycardia, and FAST exam. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of ABC score by replacing hypotension and tachycardia; with Shock Index (SI) > 1.0 and including pelvic fractures.

METHODS

We performed a 2-year (2014-2015) analysis of all high-level trauma activations and excluded patients dead on arrival. The ABC score was calculated using the 4-point score [blunt (0)/penetrating trauma (1), HR ≥ 120 (1), SBP ≤ 90 mmHg (1), and FAST positive (1)]. The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score also included 4 points, calculated by replacing HR and SBP with SI > 1.0 and including pelvic fracture. AUROC compared performances of the two scores.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were included. The overall MT was 27%. Patients receiving MT had higher median ABC scores [1.1 (0-2) vs. 1 (0-2), p = 0.15] and RABT scores [2 (1-3) vs. 1 (0-2), p < 0.001]. The RABT score had better discriminative power (AUROC = 0.828) compared to ABC score (AUROC = 0.617) for predicting the need for MT. Cutoff of RABT score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 77% for predicting need for MT compared to ABC score with 39% sensitivity and 72% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Replacement of hypotension and tachycardia with a SI > 1.0 and inclusion of pelvic fracture enhanced discrimination of ABC score for predicting the need for MT. The current ABC score would benefit from revision to more appropriately identify patients requiring MT.

Permissive hypotensive resuscitation in adult patients with traumatic haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Permissive hypotensive resuscitation (PHR) is an advancing concept aiming towards deliberative balanced resuscitation whilst treating severely injured patients, and its effectiveness on the survival rate remains unexplored. This detailed systematic review aims to critically evaluate the available literature that investigates the effects of PHR on survival rate.

METHODS

A systematic review design searched for comparative and non-comparative studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web-of-Science and CENTRAL. Full-text articles on adult trauma patients with low blood pressure were considered for inclusion. The risk of bias and a critical appraisal of the identified articles were performed to assess the quality of the selected studies. Included studies were sorted into comparative and non-comparative studies to ease the process of analysis. Mortality rates of PHR were calculated for both groups of studies.

RESULTS

From the 869 articles that were initially identified, ten studies were selected for review, including randomised control trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. By applying the risk of bias assessment and critique tools, the methodologies of the selected articles ranged from moderate to high quality. The mortality rates among patients resuscitated with low volume and large volume in the selected RCTs were 21.5% (123/570) and 28.6% (168/587) respectively, whilst the total mortality rate of the patients enrolled in three non-comparative studies was 9.97% (279/2797).

CONCLUSIONS

The death rate amongst post-trauma patients managed with conservative resuscitation was lower than standard aggressive resuscitation, which indicates that PHR can create better survival rate among traumatised patients. Therefore, PHR is a feasible and safely practiced fluid resuscitative strategy to manage haemorrhagic shock in pre-hospital and in-hospital settings. Further trials on PHR are required to assess its effectiveness on the survival rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, level III.

Fluid Resuscitation in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Yesterday and Today

The prevailing wisdom for the prehospital fluid resuscitation of trauma victims in hemorrhagic shock in 1992 was to administer 2 L of crystalloid solution as rapidly as possible. A review of the fluid resuscitation literature found that this recommendation was not well supported by the evidence at the time. Prehospital fluid resuscitation strategies were reevaluated in the 1993-1996 Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) research program. This article reviews the advances in prehospital fluid resuscitation as recommended by the original TCCC Guidelines and modified over the following 2 decades. These advances include hypotensive resuscitation, use of prehospital whole blood or blood components when feasible, and use of Hextend or selected crystalloids when logistical considerations make blood or blood component use not feasible.

Patterns of vasopressor utilization during the resuscitation of massively transfused trauma patients

BACKGROUND

The use of vasopressors (VP) in the resuscitation of massively transfused trauma patients might be considered a marker of inadequate resuscitation. We sought to characterize the utilization of VP in patients receiving massive transfusion and examine the association of their use with mortality.

METHODS

Trauma patients admitted from January 2011 to October 2016 receiving massive transfusion, defined as 3 units of pRBC within the first hour from admission, were selected for analysis. Demographics, admission vital signs and labs, use of VP, surgical interventions and outcomes were collected. Standard statistical tools were utilized.

RESULTS

Over the 5-year study period, 120 trauma patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 39 years with 77% being male and 41% sustaining a penetrating injury. Patients who received VP [VP (+)] were more likely to have a lower admission GCS (median 4.5 vs. 14.0, p <0.01) and less likely to have a penetrating injury (31% vs. 54%, p=0.02). The overall mortality was 49% and significantly higher in the VP (+) cohort (60% vs. 34%, AHR: 9.9, adjusted p=0.03). Mortality increased in a stepwise fashion with increasing number of VP utilized, starting at 34% for no VP, to 78% for 3 VP, and 100% for 5 or more. The majority of deaths in the VP (-) group (88%) occurred within one day from admission. For the VP (+) group, 57% of deaths occurred within one day, with the remaining 43% occurring at a later time.

CONCLUSION

In the era of massive transfusion protocols, vasopressors are commonly utilized in exsanguinating trauma patients and their use is associated with a higher mortality risk. Deaths in patients receiving vasopressors are more likely to occur later compared to those in patients who do not receive vasopressors. Further research to characterize the role of these agents in the resuscitation of trauma patients is required.

The Evolution of Damage Control in Concept and Practice

Damage control surgery (DCS) began as an adjunct approach to hemorrhage control, seeking to facilitate the body's innate clotting ability when direct repair or ligation was impossible, but it has since become a valuable instrument for a broader collection of critically ill surgical patients in whom metabolic dysfunction is the more immediate threat to life than imminent exsanguination. Modern damage control is a strategy that combines the principles of DCS with those of damage control resuscitation. When used correctly, damage control may improve survival in previously unsalvageable patients; when used incorrectly, it can subject patients to imprudent risk and contribute to morbidity. This review discusses the evolution of damage control in both concept and practice, summarizing available literature and experience to guide patient selection, medical decision-making, and strategy implementation throughout the preoperative, intraoperative, and early postoperative periods.

Limit Crystalloid Resuscitation after Traumatic Brain Injury

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are often resuscitated with crystalloids in the emergency department (ED) to maintain cerebral perfusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether crystalloid resuscitation volume impacts mortality in TBI patients. This was a retrospective study of trauma patients with head abbreviated injury scale score ≥2, who received crystalloids during ED resuscitation between 2004 and 2013. Clinical characteristics and volume of crystalloids received in the ED were collected. Patients who received <2 L of crystalloids were categorized as low volume (LOW), whereas those who received ≥2 L were considered high volume (HIGH). Mortality and outcomes were compared. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine the odds of mortality while controlling for confounders. Over 10 years, 875 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality was 12.5 per cent. Seven hundred and forty-two (85%) were in the LOW cohort and 133 (15%) in the HIGH cohort. Gender and age were similar between the groups. The HIGH cohort had lower admission systolic blood pressure (128 vs 138 mm Hg, P = 0.001), lower Glasgow coma scale score (10 vs 12, P < 0.001), higher head abbreviated injury scale (3.8 vs 3.3, P < 0.001), and higher injury severity score (25 vs 18, P < 0.001). The LOW group had a lower unadjusted mortality (10 vs 26%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for confounders demonstrated that those resuscitated with ≥2 L of crystalloids had increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.25, P = 0.005). Higher volume crystalloid resuscitation after TBI is associated with increased mortality, thus limited resuscitation for TBI patients may be indicated.

Muscle Oxygenation as an Early Predictor of Shock Severity in Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the potential utility of a new prototype noninvasive muscle oxygenation (MOx) measurement for the identification of shock severity in a population of patients admitted to the trauma resuscitation rooms of a Level I regional trauma center. The goal of this project was to correlate MOx with shock severity as defined by standard measures of shock: systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and lactate.

METHODS

Optical spectra were collected from subjects by placement of a custom-designed optical probe over the first dorsal interosseous muscles on the back of the hand. Spectra were acquired from trauma patients as soon as possible upon admission to the trauma resuscitation room. Patients with any injury were eligible for study. MOx was determined from the collected optical spectra with a multiwavelength analysis that used both visible and near-infrared regions of light. Shock severity was determined in each patient by a scoring system based on combined degrees of hypotension, tachycardia, and lactate. MOx values of patients in each shock severity group (mild, moderate, and severe) were compared using two-sample t tests.

RESULTS

In 17 healthy control patients, the mean MOx value was 91.0 ± 5.5%. A total of 69 trauma patients were studied. Patients classified as having mild shock had a mean MOx of 62.5 ± 26.2% (n = 33), those classified as in moderate shock had a mean MOx of 56.9 ± 26.9% (n = 25) and those classified as in severe shock had a MOx of 31.0 ± 17.1% (n = 11). Mean MOx for each of these groups was statistically different from the healthy control group (P < 0.05).Receiver operating characteristic analyses show that MOx and shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) identified shock similarly well (area under the curves [AUC] = 0.857 and 0.828, respectively). However, MOx identified mild shock better than shock index in the same group of patients (AUC = 0.782 and 0.671, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained from this pilot study indicate that MOx correlates with shock severity in a population of trauma patients. Noninvasive and continuous MOx holds promise to aid in patient triage and to evaluate patient condition throughout the course of resuscitation.