Locked plating for proximal humeral fractures: differences between the deltopectoral and deltoid-splitting approaches

An updated systematic review and meta‑analysis comparing deltoid‑split approach with deltopectoral approach for proximal humerus fractures

The present review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the currently available data and to compare the important clinical and functional outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures who were treated using deltoid split (DS) or deltopectoral (DP) surgical approaches. The PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that reported functional outcome data of patients with fracture of proximal humerus who were surgically treated using DS and DP approaches. A total of 14 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The duration of surgery [min; weighted mean difference (WMD), -16.44; 95% CI, -(25.25-7.63)], amount of blood loss [ml; WMD, -57.99; 95% CI, -(102.74-13.23)] and time to bone union [weeks WMD, -1.66; 95% CI, -(2.30-1.02)] was comparatively lower in patients that underwent DS. There were no statistically significant differences in the pain and quality of life scores, range of movement and risk of complications between the DS and the DP groups. Patients in the DS group had improved shoulder function and constant shoulder score (CSS) at 3 months post-surgery (WMD, 6.36; 95% CI, 1.06-11.65). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of CSS and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scores at 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The activity of daily living (ADL) score was significantly improved in the DS group at 3 (WMD, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.40-2.06), 6 (WMD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.25) and 12 months (WMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.18-1.47) after the surgery. The present results suggested that DS and DP surgical approaches were associated with similar clinical outcomes. The DS approach was associated with certain perioperative benefits, as well as reduced time to bone union, improved shoulder function in the early postoperative period and improved ADL scores. These benefits may be considered while choosing between these two surgical approaches.

Is there any clinical significance of axillary nerve electrophysiological changes in the deltoid split approach?

Purpose

The clinical effects of axillary nerve injury in the deltoid splitting approach are controversial. This study investigated the axillary nerve function with clinical and electrophysiologically in proximal humeral fracture patients with internal fixation using the deltoid split approach. We also aimed to investigate the effects of this damage on deltoid muscle volume and discuss the effects of volumetric changes and nerve damage on patients' clinical outcomes.

Methods

study designed prospectively with 25 consecutive patients who received open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture through a deltoid splitting approach. We performed clinical, electrophysiological, and radiological examinations during minimum follow-up time of 24 months. Electrophysiological examination comprised electromyoneurography (EMNG). Functional results followed by Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. Deltoid volumes were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Twenty-five patients operated on with open reduction internal fixation were prospectively observed. In the EMNG measurements of the patients on the 45th postoperative day, partial degeneration was observed in the anterior part of the axillary nerve in all cases (100%). In the control EMNG measurements performed at the 12th month, normal values were obtained for 15 (60%) of the patients, while findings of ongoing regeneration were detected for 10 (40%) of the patients and normal values at all patients at the 24th month. The difference between abnormal and normal EMNG groups' on 12th month Constant-Murley scores was not statistically significant in any period. Only anterior muscle thickness was statistically higher in the normal patient group than with abnormal EMNG results.

Conclusions

In proximal humeral fractures treated with the deltoid split approach, there may be iatrogenic damage of the anterior branch of the axillary nerve. Axillary nerve damage does not affect the patients' clinical scores in the early and mid-terms.

Level of evidence

LEVEL III.

Outcomes of plate osteosynthesis for displaced 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures with deltopectoral vs. deltoid split approach

PURPOSE

Three part and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus offer challenges in reduction and plate fixation, with considerable debate about use of Deltoid splitting (DS) and Delto-pectoral (DP) approaches, especially when they involving the greater tuberosity. We prospectively compared the results using DS approach and DP approach in these cases, with special focus on functional outcomes, complications, and ease of tuberosity reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

84 patients with three- and four-part proximal humerus fracture were alternately allocated the DP approach or DS approach for proximal humerus locking plate fixation. The outcome analysis was done by evaluating relative Constant score and ease of surgical reduction of greater tuberosity; radiological malunion was evaluated using Beredjiklian classification and complications were noted.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 23 months (19-48 months), the mean 'relative Constant score was 74.27 ± 8.19 in the DP group and 73.26 ± 8.02 in the DS group and the difference was statistically insignificant (p = 0.988). There was no significant difference with respect to shoulder ROM, abductor strength, radiological malunion or complications. However, the mean surgical time was significantly less (p value = 0.042) in DS group (65 ± 5 min) in comparison to DP group (92 ± 4.3 min); significantly less difficulties were documented by the surgeon in reducing the greater tuberosity in DS group(p value = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although surgical time was reduced and greater tuberosity reduction was easier in DS group, the other outcomes were similar; either surgical approach can be used based, and can be based on the experience and comfort level of the surgeon.

Effect of surgical approaches on deltoid innervation and clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the effects of deltopectoral and anterolateral acromial approaches commonly used in open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures on the clinical outcomes, and axillary nerve damage through electrophysiological assessment.

Patients and methods

Forty-eight patients (22 males, 26 females; mean age 47.9±13.2 years; range, 22 to 73 years) diagnosed with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 11 proximal humeral fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with anatomical locking plates in our hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to either the deltopectoral or anterolateral deltoid-split surgical approach used. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and Constant-Murley scores (CMS) obtained at three- and 12-month follow-up visits. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed for the electrophysiological assessment of the deltoid muscle.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, follow-up times, and complications. DASH scores and CMS obtained postoperatively at three months (p=0.327 and p=0.531, respectively) and 12 months (p=0.324 and p=0.648, respectively) revealed no significant differences. In addition, the two groups did not significantly differ with respect to the presence of EMG abnormalities (p=0.792). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was detected in only two patients from the deltopectoral group.

Conclusion

Deltopectoral and anterolateral approaches do not differ regarding the presence of postoperative EMG abnormalities and functional outcomes. Surgeons can thus adopt either approach. However, dissection without damaging the soft tissue should be performed in both approaches.

Comparison between minimally invasive deltoid-split and extended deltoid-split approach for proximal humeral fractures: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

With the rapid aging of the population, the incidence of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) has increased. However, the optimal method for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with PHF who underwent locking plate internal fixation at our institution from January 2016 to December 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach used: an expanded deltoid-split approach group (ORIF group) and minimally invasive deltoid-split approach group (minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, [MIPPO] group). The groups were compared in terms of demographic and perioperative characteristics, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 115 cases of PHF were included in our study, of which 64 cases were treated using the minimally invasive deltoid-split approach and 51 using the extended deltoid-split approach. Fluoroscopy was performed significantly less frequently in the ORIF group and the surgical duration was shorter. However, the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score and duration of postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher compared to the MIPPO group. Moreover, secondary loss was significantly less extensive in the ORIF group compared to the MIPPO group, while there was no significant group difference in fracture healing time, Constant shoulder score, or complications at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes associated with both the minimally invasive and extended deltoid-split approaches were satisfactory. The data presented here suggest that the extended deltoid-split approach was superior to the minimally invasive deltoid-split approach in terms of operational time, fluoroscopy, and secondary loss of reduction, while the minimally invasive approach was superior in terms of postoperative pain and hospital stay. Accordingly, neither procedure can be considered definitively superior; the optimal surgical procedure for PHF can only be determined after full consideration of the situation and requirements of the individual patient.

Long head of biceps in proximal fractures of the humerus: an underestimated problem?

Background and aim of the work:

The long head of biceps (LHB) is one of the tendons of the rotator cuff that runs strictly close to the humeral head. In case of pathology, it can be responsible for pain and shoulder impairment: in such cases, surgical options include tenotomy or tenodesis. The management of LHB along with surgery of the rotator cuff or during shoulder prosthetic replacement has been widely discussed in the literature. Conversely, the possibility of acute impingement and incarceration of LHB in proximal humerus fractures, as well as its role in shoulder pain in outcomes of these fractures, has been poorly considered.

Methods:

The following aspects in the literature on LHB and proximal humerus fractures have been analysed: its management during fixation of fractures, the possibility of interference of the tendon with reduction of fractures or dislocations of the shoulder and its possible role in chronic pain after fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Results:

LHB can be an obstacle in the reduction of fractures, dislocations and fracture-dislocations. Only a few papers take into account acute surgery to LHB (tenotomy or tenodesis); most of the studies on fixation of proximal humerus fractures simply ignore the problem of LHB. The tendon can be a source of pain and a cause of disability in sequelae of these fractures.

Conclusions:

LHB should be taken into consideration both in the acute phase of fractures of the proximal humerus and in the outcomes. Other studies are needed to better understand its optimal management during fracture surgery. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail

PURPOSE

There is still disagreement regarding the optimal surgical treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The aim of this monocentric, retrospective study was to compare the complication rate of internal fixation with a locking plate versus proximal humeral nailing after a one-year follow-up.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2016, 292 patients suffered a fracture of the proximal humerus and were treated surgically at our level-I trauma center. According to the inclusion criteria, 50 patients were included in this study: 19 of these (11 three-part fractures and 8 four-part fractures) were treated with a proximal humeral nail (HN) and 31 (12 three-part fractures and 19 four-part fractures) with a locking plate (LP) osteosynthesis. Classification was performed according to the Hertel classification. At a 1-year follow-up, the complication rate of the two treatment methods was compared.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (40%) suffered at least one complication. Of these, six patients (12%) were treated with a HN and 14 (28%) with a LP (p = 0.39). The most frequent complication was screw perforation (22%), followed by non-union (16%). Humeral head necrosis (10%) occurred only in the LP cohort. One wound infection occurred in a patient treated with a HN. Four-part fractures were treated more frequently with a LP. However, the difference was non-significant in this sample (p = 0.186).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study provide some evidence that in terms of complication rate, both treatment options are comparable for internal fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. The type of fracture seems to be decisive for the choice of implant.

Late screw-related complications in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review

Locking plating is a common surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with satisfactory clinical results. Implant-related complications, especially screw-related, have been reported, however, the lack of information regarding their onset, used surgical technique, complexity of the fracture, bone quality etc., prevents from understanding the causes for them. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the potential risk factors for late screw complications by gathering information about the patient characteristics, comorbidities, fracture types, surgical approaches and implant types. A PubMed search was performed using humerus, fractures, bone and locking as keywords in clinical papers written in English. All abstracts and manuscripts on distal or humerus shaft fractures, and those on proximal humerus fractures without any or with only iatrogenic complications were excluded. One hundred studies met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 33% of the reported cases having at least one complication, with 11% of all complications being screw-related. Most of the latter were secondary screw perforations and screw cut-outs, being predominantly linked to poor bone quality, while screw loosening and retraction were found less frequently as a result of locking mechanism failure. Overall, the amount of information for complications was limited and screw perforation was the most frequent screw-related complication, mostly reported in female patients older than 50 years, following four-part or AO/OTA type C fractures and detected four weeks postoperatively. The sparse information in the literature could be an indicator that the late screw complications might have been under-reported and under-described, making the understanding of the screw-related complications even more challenging.

Posttraumatic Avascular Necrosis After Proximal Femur, Proximal Humerus, Talar Neck, and Scaphoid Fractures

Posttraumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) is osteonecrosis from vascular disruption, commonly encountered after fractures of the femoral neck, proximal humerus, talar neck, and scaphoid. These locations have a tenuous vascular supply; the diagnosis, risk factors, natural history, and treatment are reviewed. Fracture nonunion only correlates with AVN in the scaphoid. In the femoral head, the risk is increased for displaced fractures, but the time to surgery and open versus closed treatment do not seem to influence the risk. Patients with collapse are frequently symptomatic, and total hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment. In the humeral head, certain fracture patterns correlate with avascularity at the time of injury, but most do not go on to develop AVN due to head revascularization. Additionally, newer surgical approaches and improved construct stability appear to lessen the risk of AVN. The likelihood of AVN of the talar body rises with increased severity of talar injury. The development of AVN corresponds with a worse prognosis and increases the likelihood of secondary procedures. In proximal pole scaphoid fractures, delays in diagnosis and treatment elevate the risk of AVN, which is often seen in cases of nonunion. The need for vascularized versus nonvascularized bone grafting when repairing scaphoid nonunions with AVN remains unclear.

PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES TREATED WITH OSTEOSYNTHESIS USING THE ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH

OBJECTIVE

The main surgical approach in proximal humeral fractures is the deltopectoral approach. Many surgeons avoid the anterolateral approach, fearing its complications, especially axillary nerve injury. The objective of this study is to evaluate shoulder function and complications in patients with proximal humeral fractures treated using an anterolateral approach with direct observation of the axillary nerve.

METHODS

Retrospective study with postoperative radiological and functional evaluations (Constant and DASH scores) and review of the complications. The associations between fracture classification and the difference in Constant scores among the subjects and the final angle of consolidation were analyzed using Fisher's test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Constant scores were compared among the shoulders using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 35 patients. Shoulder function was decreased, compared with the contralateral side (p<0.005). The only factor related to functional worsening was the Neer IV fracture. The main complication was malunion. There were no clinical changes related to the axillary nerve.

CONCLUSION

The treatment using the extended anterolateral approach produced good functional results, although the function was decreased (Neer IV fractures). The main complication was malunion. There were no side effects due to exposure of the axillary nerve. Level of evidence III, Retrospective Study.

ANTEROLATERAL APPROACHES FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Objective:

Anterolateral approaches for proximal humerus osteosynthesis have great advantages because they allow direct exposure of the lateral aspect of the humerus without the muscular retraction seen in the deltopectoral approach. However, much resistance is found among surgeons due to the potential risk of iatrogenic injury to the axillary nerve. To identify the incidence of axillary nerve iatrogenic lesions and evaluate the functional results of proximal humerus osteosynthesis with locking plates using anterolateral approaches.

Methods:

The literature review followed the PRISMA protocol.

Results:

A total of 23 articles were selected from 786 patients submitted to anterolateral approaches. Three cases (0.38%) of iatrogenic axillary nerve lesions were confirmed. The results of the functional tests were similar to those of the deltopectoral approach.

Conclusion:

Anterolateral approaches are a viable and safe alternative for proximal humerus osteosynthesis with locking plate. Subacromial impingement was the most frequent complication. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review.

Deltoid-split approach versus deltopectoral approach for proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the evidence of deltoid-split approach (DS) versus deltopectoral approach (DP) in treatment of proximal humerus fractures from current RCT and prospective literatures.

METHODS

The electronic literature database of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library was searched at December 2017. The data complications (including implant failure, humeral head necrosis, infection, radiological adverse events, nonunion rate, subacromial impingement, and damage of the axillary nerve), functional outcomes (including Constant, NEER, DASH, ADL, VAS score), operation time, hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss were extracted and analyzed by STATA 11.0 software.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and three prospective comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that the DS group had a significantly low humeral head necrosis rate and short operation time. No significant difference was found in total complication rate, functional outcome, and other Perioperative parameters between DS and DP groups.

CONCLUSION

The prospective evidence suggested that DS approach for proximal humerus fractures had less humeral head necrosis and short operation time than DP approach. Both DS and DP approach had similar results in functional outcomes, total complication, VAS, and hospital stay.

DOES SURGEON SPECIALIZATION CHANGE THE PROXIMAL HUMERAL OSTEO-SYNTHESIS APPROACH?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the choice of surgical approach among Brazilian orthopedists and whether shoulder surgery specialty training or duration of experience influences the decision-making.

METHODS

A questionnaire on the preferred approach and complications was administered to orthopedic surgeons with and without shoulder specialization training. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was applied.

RESULTS

We interviewed 114 orthopedists, 49 (43.0%) traumatologists, 36 (31.5%) specialist surgeons, and 29 (25%) shoulder surgery specialist residents. In cases of fracture without dislocation, specialized training and duration of experience did not influence the approach used (primarily deltopectoral). In cases of fracture/dislocation, 97.2% of the specialists versus 82.1% of the traumatologists opted for the deltopectoral approach (p = 0.034). In cases of fractures/dislocation, 92.5% of surgeons with more than 5 years of experience and 78.7% with less than 5 years of experience opted for the deltopectoral approach (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Specialization in shoulder surgery did not influence surgeons' approaches to manage fractures without dislocation. In cases of fracture/dislocation, shoulder surgery specialization training and duration of experience were associated with selection of the deltopectoral approach. Level of Evidence V, Expert opinion.

Mid-term results of minimally invasive deltoid-split versus standard open deltopectoral approach for PHILOS™ (proximal humeral internal locking system) osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures

PURPOSE

Only a few reports compare the mid- and long-term outcome of the minimally invasive deltoid split (MIDS) with the classic anterior deltopectoral (DP) approach for osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures. This study compared the mid-term functional and the radiological results in patients with proximal humeral fractures undergoing osteosynthesis with the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS™).

METHODS

All patients undergoing osteosynthesis between 2008 and 2015 were clinically and radiologically examined with a minimal follow-up period of 1 year. Functional outcomes were analyzed using the DASH- and Constant Shoulder Scores (CSS). Radiological results were analyzed using a newly developed score.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients underwent PHILOS™ osteosynthesis with the MIDS and twenty-three with the DP approach. Follow-up time was 41 months in the MIDS group and 62 months in the DP group, respectively. The median CSS was similar with 79 points in the MIDS group and 82 points in the DP group (p = 0.17). The MIDS group showed a significant lower power measurement in the CSS. In four-part fractures, a substantially lower CSS in absolute numbers in the MIDS group was detected. The median DASH score was 26.7 points in the MIDS group and 25.8 points in the DP group (p = 0.48). There was no difference in the radiological score. More patients with partial avascular necrosis (AVN) were found in the MIDS group, most with three- and four-part fractures. However, this was not statistically significant. Morbidity was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of the two surgical approaches are statistically comparable. Some differences such as a lower power measurement in the MIDS group, a higher partial AVN frequency and more plate removals are observed. In four-part fractures, the CSS was lower in the MIDS compared to the DP cohort. The MIDS technique might not be a solution for all fracture types, and the surgeon should be careful to analyze the morphology of the fracture before deciding upon the approach. Four-part fractures might be better treated with a DP approach.

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis via a Deltoidsplitting Approach with Strut Allograft for the Treatment of Displaced 3- or 4-part Proximal Humeral Fractures

Background

This study introduces a surgical technique with good clinical outcome useful in the treatment of osteoporotic displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

From May 2014 to February 2016, 16 patients with displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures were treated by application of a locking plate with an endosteal strut allograft via a deltoid splitting approach with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The allograft was inserted through a fractured gap of the greater tuberosity to support the humeral head and then fixed by a locking plate with meticulous soft tissue dissection to protect the axillary nerve. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, radiological imaging, and clinical examination. Fixation failure on radiographs was defined as a >5° loss of neck shaft angle (NSA) compared to that on an immediate postoperative radiograph. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head was also evaluated.

Results

In all cases, complete union was achieved. The ASES and VAS scores were improved to 85.4 ± 2.1 and 3.2 ± 1.3, respectively. Twelve patients (75.0%) had greater than a 5° change in NSA; the average NSA change was 3.8°. Five patients (31.3%) had unsatisfactory ranges of motion exhibiting a <100° active forward flexion. No axillary nerve injuries or AVN were observed at the last follow-up. One patient was converted to reverse total arthroplasty due to severe pain and functional deficit.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive fixation via a locking compression plate and an endosteal fibula strut allograft in Neer classification 3-or 4-part fractures with severe osteoporosis in elderly patients can achieve good clinical results.

Modified minimally invasive approach and intra-osseous portal for three-part proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fracture is a common fracture. Different approaches have been utilized in the surgical intervention of three-part fractures. Our study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of a modified anterolateral approach and intra-osseous portal in minimally invasive treatment for three-part proximal humeral fractures in comparison to the traditional deltopectoral approach.

METHODS

From March 2015 to September 2016, 13 patients with three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated with internal fixation through the modified anterolateral minimally invasive approach (MIPO). These cases were compared to 20 additional cases using the deltopectoral approach (DP). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed, including the constant score (CS) and range of motion in abduction, flexion/extension and external/internal rotation. Complications were recorded as well.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for a mean time of 12.12 ± 4.01 months. At the latest follow-up, no significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in terms of length of stay, range of motion for abduction, flexion or internal/external rotation of the shoulder, Constant score or visual analog scors (VAS) for pain. Elbow flexion (142.31 ± 8.32 vs. 123.00 ± 10.18), posterior shoulder extension (41.92 ± 5.22 vs. 35.50 ± 5.83) and postoperative VAS (4.38 ± 1.04 vs. 6.15 ± 0.99) were significantly better in the MIPO group than in the DP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were detected in the radiographic evaluation, and complications including axillary nerve injury were not present.

CONCLUSION

The use of the modified anterolateral approach and intra-osseous portal is safe and effective for minimally invasive reduction and plating treatment for three-part proximal humeral fractures.

Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures constitute a significant percentage of fragility fractures. The growing use of locking plate has helped treat this problem, but at the same time has brought about complications. Past systematic reviews have documented these complications, however a large number of recent studies have been published since, reporting their own complication rates with different techniques. This study reviews the current complications associated with locking plate of proximal humerus fractures as well as methods to reduce them. A systematic review, following the PRISMA guidelines, was conducted in November 2013 and repeated in March 2015, using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, to evaluate locking plate fixation (and complications) of traumatic proximal humerus fractures. Inclusion criteria included adults (>18 years), minimum of 12-month postoperative followup, articles within the last 5 years, and studies with >10 participants. Exclusion criteria included pathologic fractures, cadaveric studies, and nonhuman subjects. Eligible studies were graded using a quality scoring system. Articles with a minimum of 7/10 score were included and assessed regarding their level of evidence per the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. The initial query identified 51,206 articles from multiple databases. These records were thoroughly screened and resulted in 57 articles, consisting of seven Level 1, three Level 2, 10 Level 3, and 37 Level 4 studies, totaling 3422 proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. Intraarticular screw penetration was the most reported complication (9.5%), followed by varus collapse (6.8%), subacromial impingement (5.0%), avascular necrosis (4.6%), adhesive capsulitis (4.0%), nonunion (1.5%), and deep infection (1.4%). Reoperation occurred at a rate of 13.8%. Collapse at the fracture site contributed to a majority of the implant-related complications, which in turn were the main reasons for reoperation. The authors of these studies discussed different techniques that could be used to address these issues. Expanding use of locking plate in the proximal humerus fractures leads to improvements and advancements in surgical technique. Further research is necessary to outline indications to decrease complications, further.

Establishing the appropriate position of proximal humerus locking plates: a cadaveric study of five plating systems and their anatomic reference measurements

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to determine anatomic references for the placement of five proximal humerus locking plates.

METHODS

Five proximal humerus locking-plate systems were placed on six human shoulder cadavers. Plates were positioned by fluoroscopic confirmation so that the inferior oblique screw was within 5 mm of the inferomedial cortex. Plate position was measured using the superior border of the pectoralis major tendon (PMT) to the bottom of the first slotted or nonlocking hole and top of the plate to the top of the greater tuberosity. The distance from the PMT insertion to the top of the humeral head was measured as a control.

RESULTS

There was consistency within each plating system for both the distance from the PMT insertion to the first hole and the top of the plate to the greater tuberosity: Synthes first-generation [mean (SD) 13.7 mm (3.1 mm); 10 mm (1.3) mm], Synthes second-generation [28.2 mm (2.2 mm); 18.5 mm (2.7 mm)], Biomet OptiLock® [25.5 mm (2.7 mm); 18.7 mm (2 mm)], Stryker AxSOS® [5 mm (2.8 mm); 12.3 mm (3.3 mm)] and Acumed Polarus® [9.5 mm (1.8 mm); 14.8 mm (1.6 mm)].

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides measurements that improve the accuracy of plate positioning for five plating systems.

MIPO of proximal humerus fractures through an anterolateral acromial approach. Is the axillary nerve at risk?

PURPOSE

It is known that shoulder surgery may cause iatrogenic injury to the axillary nerve as a serious complication, but there is little evidence to indicate whether the axillary nerve is at risk of injury during an anterolateral acromial approach for minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of proximal humerus fractures. We hypothesised that this surgical method is safe for the axillary nerve and would preserve it from iatrogenic injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective follow-up cohort study on 49 consecutive patients with proximal humerus fractures who were managed with MIPO through an anterolateral approach. All patients underwent standardised electroneurographic testing, with assessment of amplitudes of evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) and distal motor latencies (DML) of the axillary nerves, pre- and post-operatively. Six weeks after injury, all patients underwent needle electromyographic (EMG) testing of anterior, middle, posterior deltoid, teres minor and paraspinal muscles for detecting abnormal muscle activity as a sign of acute denervation. After six months of physical rehabilitation, patients with axillary nerve injury underwent control electroneurographic testing to check the recovery of neurographic features (CMAP, DML). All nerve measurements were compared to reference values, and between right and left side.

RESULTS

Five patients had a mild-to-moderate traumatic axillary nerve injury before surgery. There were no significant differences between amplitudes of CMAP (p = 0.575) and DML (p = 0.857) pre- and post-surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirmed safety of this surgical method in the preservation of axillary nerve from iatrogenic injury, but the course of the axillary nerve must be kept in mind.

Axillary nerve lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures through an extended lateral deltoid-split approach: electrophysiological findings

BACKGROUND

Axillary nerve injuries after shoulder surgery are rare. In most studies, the frequency of injury is usually determined using clinical examinations, but results from intraoperative neuromonitoring studies have revealed higher than expected rates. Few studies have investigated this topic. Our aim was to determine the frequency of axillary nerve lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures by using electrophysiological assessments and to provide a review of the relevant literature.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 76 consecutive patients who received open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humeral fracture using a locking plate through a deltoid-splitting approach. We performed a clinical and electrophysiological examination at a minimum follow-up time of 12 months. Functional results were assessed according to the Constant-Murley and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Electrophysiological examinations comprised electromyography, electroneurography, and motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. The main outcome was the frequency of axillary nerve lesions.

RESULTS

Forty patients were monitored for an average of 28 months. The mean raw Constant-Murley score was 61 points, the age- and gender-adjusted score was 71%, and the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 33 points. Neurapraxia occurred in 1 patient, axonotmesis with incomplete reinnervation occurred in 3, and complete reinnervation occurred in 3. The latter group was classified as having a temporary axillary nerve lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10% rate of permanent axillary nerve lesions in our cohort is higher than expected based on the clinical examination. Electrophysiological assessment is therefore more appropriate to detect axillary nerve injuries.

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus represents a challenging problem to the surgeon. It is commonly seen following multi-fragmentary fractures of the proximal humerus which may affect the long-term functional recovery after such injuries. This review summarises the current evidence on risk factors, reasons why estimating its epidemiology is difficult, the vascular supply of the humeral head, classification, and management options.

Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective observational study

Background

The optimal treatment for proximal humeral fractures remains under debate. In this article, we report the mid-term results of patients who underwent the less-invasive implantation of a polyaxial locking plate for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

This study included patients who were treated with a polyaxial locking plate via an anterolateral deltoid split approach from May 2008 to December 2011. We evaluated outcome parameters after a minimum follow-up period of 2.5 years (median 4.5 years, follow-up rate 62 %) including the age- and gender-dependent Constant score, the activities of daily living score, and the visual analog scale for both pain and subjective shoulder function.

Results

Of the 140 patients who underwent surgery, 114 were included in the follow-up and 71 completed the questionnaire. Fifteen patients (21 %) exhibited 2-fragment fractures, and 56 patients (79 %) exhibited 3- and 4-part fractures. The Constant score improved significantly (4.5 years: 70 ± 21, p < 0.001) between the first two follow-ups (6 weeks: 35 ± 14, 6 months: 56 ± 18, p < 0.001), and also between 6 months and 4.5 years post-surgery. At the final follow-up, the activities of daily living score had not reached pre-fracture levels (before trauma: 27 ± 5, 4.5 years: 20 ± 8, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis showed that age has a more significant influence on the final outcome than fracture morphology or gender.

Conclusion

Although the less-invasive surgical procedure is a feasible treatment option in proximal humeral fractures with acceptable complications and considerable improvement during the first six months, a lengthy recovery time is required. The majority of our patients did not become pain-free or reach pre-fracture activity levels.

Locked plate osteosynthesis of humeral head-splitting fractures in young adults

BACKGROUND

Humeral head-splitting fractures occur in younger patients and can be associated with poor outcome. We decided to study the functional outcome and complications in simple and complex humeral head-splitting fractures. We hypothesized that simple head-splitting fractures will perform better compared with complex head-splitting fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of 16 patients <55 years who underwent locked plating for humeral head-splitting fractures were reviewed. Five fractures were classified as simple (isolated head-splitting fractures) and 11 as complex fractures (associated tuberosity fractures). Union and quality of articular and tuberosity reduction were assessed radiologically. Shoulder and upper limb function was assessed by Constant and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Complications such as osteonecrosis, nonunion, and arthritic changes were also recorded.

RESULTS

Of 15 fractures, 13 had united at a mean follow-up of 34 months (25-47 months). No osteonecrosis or nonunion was seen in simple fractures. In complex fractures, osteonecrosis was seen in 4 patients (P = .01), nonunion in 2 patients, and glenohumeral arthritis in 1 patient. The mean Constant score (66.5 [56-77]) and DASH score (21 [7.5-35.8]) showed significantly better outcomes in simple fractures (Constant score, P = .02; DASH score, P = .029).

CONCLUSION

Locked plating achieves satisfactory results in simple head-splitting fractures. Complex fractures are associated with higher rates of nonunion, avascular necrosis, and inferior shoulder function.

Advantage of minimally invasive lateral approach relative to conventional deltopectoral approach for treatment of proximal humerus fractures

Background

Despite the wide application of open reduction and internal fixation with locking plates for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, the surgical invasive approach remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the pros and cons of the minimally invasive lateral approach for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) in comparison with the deltopectoral approach.

Material/Methods

All patients who sustained a PHF and received open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgery with locking plate through either minimally invasive subacromial approach or conventional deltopectoral approach between January 2008 and February 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the conventional group and min-group according to the surgical incision. Surgery-related information, postoperative radiography, complications, and shoulder functional measurement scores in a 2-year follow-up were collected and evaluated.

Results

Ninety-one patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this study. We observed a significant difference in both surgery time (81.8±18.3 vs. 91.0±18.4) (p=0.021) and blood loss (172±54.2 vs. 205±73.6) (p=0.016) between the min-group and conventional group. Compared to the conventional group, the min-group had significantly better Constant-Murley score and DASH score at early follow-up (p<0.05) and higher patients satisfaction rate (8.1±1.1 vs. 7.6±1.2) (p= 0.019). The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that age, PHF types, surgical groups, surgery time, and blood loss have significant effect on the activity of affected shoulder in both abduction and forward flexion (p<0.05) except for gender factor. While larger range of movement of the affected shoulder, mainly in the 2-part and 3-part fractures, was observed in the min-group, the conventional group obtained better movement in the 4-part fractures.

Conclusions

The minimally invasive lateral approach is the optimal alternative for the treatment of Neer’s type 2 and 3 proximal humerus fractures.

Deltoid-split or deltopectoral approaches for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures?

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures are mainly associated with osteoporosis and are becoming more common with the aging of our society. The best surgical approach for internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures is still being debated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate whether the deltoid-split approach is superior to the deltopectoral approach with regard to (1) complication rate; (2) shoulder function (Constant score); and (3) pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) for internal fixation of displaced humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate.

METHODS

We randomized 120 patients with proximal humeral fractures to receive one of these two approaches (60 patients for each approach). We prospectively documented demographic and perioperative data (sex, age, fracture type, hospital stay, operation time, and fluoroscopy time) as well as complications. Followup examinations were conducted at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, including radiological and clinical evaluations (Constant score, activities of daily living, and pain [VAS]). Baseline and perioperative data were comparable for both approaches. The sample size was chosen to provide 80% power, but it reached only 68% as a result of the loss of followups to detect a 10-point difference on the Constant score, which we considered the minimum clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Complications or reoperations between the approaches were not different. Eight patients in the deltoid-split group (14%) needed surgical revisions compared with seven patients in the deltopectoral group (13%; p = 1.00). Deltoid-split and deltopectoral approaches showed similar Constant scores 12 months postoperatively (Deltoid-split 81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74-87 versus deltopectoral 73; 95% CI, 64-81; p = 0.13), and there were no differences between the groups in terms of pain at 1 year (deltoid-split 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4 versus deltopectoral 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7-3.2; p = 0.14). No learning-curve effects were noted; fluoroscopy use during surgery and function and pain scores during followups were similar among the first 30 patients and the next 30 patients treated in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate is reliable using both approaches. For a definitive recommendation for one of these approaches, further studies with appropriate sample size are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults

Most proximal humeral fractures affect elderly patients and can be treated nonoperatively with good functional outcomes.The treatment of displaced three and four-part fractures remains controversial and depends on a variety of underlying factors related to the patient (e.g., comorbidity, functional demand), the fracture (e.g., osteoporosis), and the surgeon (e.g., experience).Throughout the literature, open reduction and locking plate osteosynthesis is associated with considerable complication rates, particularly in the presence of osteoporosis.Low local bone mineral density, humeral head ischemia, residual varus displacement, insufficient restoration of the medial column, and nonanatomic reduction promote failure of fixation and impair functional outcome.The outcome of hemiarthroplasty is closely related to tuberosity healing in an anatomic position to enable the restoration of rotator cuff function. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty may provide satisfactory shoulder function in geriatric patients with preexisting rotator cuff dysfunction or after the failure of first-line treatment.

Open reduction internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures continues to evolve. While the many of these injuries can be managed nonoperatively, a certain percentage require operative treatment. Open reduction internal fixation can offer excellent outcomes when performed in the appropriate patient and utilizing proper techniques. This article reviews the most up-to-date literature regarding all phases of proximal humerus fracture osteosynthesis, including diagnosis, imaging, anatomic considerations, surgical indications, fixation, and surgical outcomes.