Nonsurgical management of delayed splenic rupture after blunt trauma

A rare case of delayed splenic rupture following initial negative CT scan imaging: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Delayed splenic rupture is an often unpredictable event with high mortality. In this report, we discuss the successful management of delayed splenic rupture, presenting days after index injury, with no commonly associated injuries or blunt abdominal trauma.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50 year old male, not on anticoagulants, presented with blunt trauma after driving his motorcycle into a tree. The patient sustained right 3-5 rib fractures, displaced right midclavicular fracture, 25 % right pneumothorax, T5-9 posterior spinous process fractures, left 2nd-5th metatarsal fractures, and scattered abrasions to the left foot, knee and hand. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and admission abdominal multi-detector CT were negative for any intra-abdominal injuries. On hospital day 5, the patient acutely decompensated. FAST was grossly positive and emergent laparotomy revealed a splenic rupture. After a splenectomy, he recovered.

DISCUSSION

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Although acute injury often presents with imaging findings or sequelae of hemorrhagic shock, complications of splenic trauma have the potential to result in delayed catastrophe. Bedside ultrasonography is a useful tool to assess acute decompensation in trauma patients along with CT imaging. Prompt identification and hemorrhage control are crucial to survival after trauma.

CONCLUSION

Repeat CT scans are also important for the identification of delayed splenic rupture and timely intervention. Delayed hemorrhage after blunt trauma should never be ruled out regardless of the injury complexity or length of hospital admission.

Non-Operative Management of Delayed Splenic Rupture 4 Months Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

BACKGROUND Delayed splenic rupture is a rare complication of non-operative management of a primary splenic trauma which, without proper clinical vigilance, may result in life-threatening events. It usually occurs 4-8 days after injury and, in most cases, surgery is the treatment of choice. Since non-operative management of splenic trauma, which allows splenic salvage, has become increasingly popular, the same approach could also be applied in delayed splenic rupture. We herein present a case of delayed splenic rupture that occurred 4 months after the trauma and was successfully managed non-operatively. CASE REPORT A 32-year-old woman presented with diffuse abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea 4 months after sustaining minor thoracoabdominal blunt trauma due to a car accident. That event was inadequately investigated and was not admitted for further monitoring. Computerized tomography revealed a rupture of a splenic hematoma in the context of the previous splenic trauma. She was closely monitored and remained hemodynamically stable. She was discharged and followed up, with no reported relapse of her clinical condition. CONCLUSIONS Delayed splenic rupture occurring 4 months after the primary splenic trauma is extremely rare. Due to its prolonged delay, delayed rupture of the spleen can easily be overlooked and not be included in the original differential diagnosis. Negligence of this event can result in dreaded complications with hemodynamic instability or even death. Furthermore, its higher mortality rate compared to primary splenic rupture highlights the importance of proper clinical vigilance. Non-operative management should be attempted in hemodynamically stable patients.

The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) has been an effective adjunct to the Non-operative management (NOM) for blunt splenic injury (BSI). However, the optimal embolization techniques are still inconclusive. To further understand the roles of different embolization locations and embolic materials in SAE, we conducted this system review and meta-analyses.

METHODS

Clinical studies related to SAE for adult patients were researched in electronic databases, included PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar Search (between October 1991 and March 2013), and relevant information was extracted. To eliminate the heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was conducted on two reduced study sets. Then, the pooled outcomes were compared and the quality assessments were performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The SAE success rate, incidences of life-threatening complications of different embolization techniques were compared by χ² test in 1st study set. Associations between different embolization techniques and clinical outcomes were evaluated by fixed-effects model in 2nd study set.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in 1st study set. And then, 13 of them were excluded, because lack of the necessary details of SAE. The remaining 10 studies comprised 2nd study set, and quality assessments were performed using NOS. In 1st set, the primary success rate is 90.1% and the incidence of life-threatening complications is 20.4%, though the cases which required surgical intervention are very few (6.4%). For different embolization locations, there was no obvious association between primary success rate and embolization location in both 1st and 2nd study sets (P > 0.05). But in 2nd study set, it indicated that proximal embolization reduced severe complications and complications needed surgical management. As for the embolic materials, the success rate between coil and gelfoam is not significant. However, coil is associated with a lower risk of life-threatening complications, as well as less complications requiring surgical management.

CONCLUSIONS

Different embolization techniques affect the clinical outcomes of SAE. The proximal embolization is the best option due to the less life-threatening complications. For commonly embolic material, coil is superior to gelfoam for fewer severe complications and less further surgery management.

Definition of hemodynamic stability in blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and assessment amongst Dutch trauma team members

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is a great contributor to mortality worldwide. One of the challenges in trauma care is early identification and management of bleeding. The circulatory status of blunt trauma patients in the emergency room is evaluated using hemodynamic (HD) parameters. However, there is no consensus on which parameters to use. In this study, we evaluate the used terms and definitions in the literature for HD stability and compare those to the opinion of Dutch trauma team members.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed to collect the definitions used for HD stability. Studies describing the assessment and/or treatment of blunt trauma patients in the emergency room were included. In addition, an online survey was conducted amongst Dutch trauma team members.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 222, 67 articles were found to be eligible for inclusion. HD stability was defined in 70% of these articles. The most used parameters were systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Besides the variety of parameters, a broad range of corresponding cut-off points is noted. Despite some common ground, high inter- and intra-variability is seen for the physicians that are part of the Dutch trauma teams.

CONCLUSION

All authors acknowledge HD stability as the most important factor in the assessment and management of blunt trauma patients. There is, however, no consensus in the literature as well as none-to-fair consensus amongst Dutch trauma team members in the definition of HD stability. A trauma team ready to co-operate with consensus-based opinions together with a valid scoring system is in our opinion the best method to assess and treat seriously injured trauma patients.

Spleen function after preservation in a physiological solution

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphology and function of implanted autogenous spleen tissue after 24 h of preservation in a physiological solution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-five male rats were divided into seven groups (n = 5): group 1, without surgical procedure; group 2, total splenectomy; group 3, total splenectomy and immediate implant of autogenous spleen tissue; group 4, total splenectomy and preservation of the entire spleen in lactated Ringer solution at room temperature for 24 h, followed by spleen sectioning and implantation; group 5, total splenectomy, followed by spleen sectioning and preservation in lactated Ringer solution at room temperature for 24 h and subsequent implantation of the slices; group 6, total splenectomy and preservation of the entire spleen in lactated Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h, followed by spleen sectioning and implantation; and group 7, total splenectomy, the spleen was sliced and preserved in lactate Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h, followed by implantation of the slices. After 90 d, scintigraphic studies using sulfur colloid labeled with 99mTc of the liver, lungs, spleen, implants, and a blood clot were performed. Hematological (erythrogram, leukogram, and platelets) and histologic studies were carried out.

RESULTS

The autogenous splenic implants regenerated in all animals that received those implants preserved at 4°C and immediately after excision. The scintigraphic study showed a better phagocytic function in groups 1, 3, 6, and 7. No difference was observed in the hematological study.

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen tissue preserved in lactated Ringer solution at 4°C for 24 h maintains its vitality and capacity to recover hematological and phagocytic functions.

Non-operative management attempted for selective high grade blunt hepatosplenic trauma is a feasible strategy

Background

There is growing evidence of clinical data recently for successful outcomes of non-operative management (NOM) for blunt hepatic and spleen injuries (BHSI). However, the effectiveness of NOM for high-grade BHSI remains undefined. The aim of the present study was to review our experience with NOM in high-grade BHSI and compare results with the existing related data worldwide.

Methods

In this retrospectively protocol-driven study, 150 patients with grade 3–5 BHSI were enrolled during a 3-year period. Patients were divided into immediate laparotomy (immediate OP) and initial non-operative (initial NOM) groups according to hemodynamic status judged by duty trauma surgeon. Patients who received initial NOM were divided into successful NOM (s-NOM) and failed NOM (f-NOM) subgroups according to conservative treatment failure. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and the outcomes of patients.

Results

Twenty-eight (18.7%) patients underwent immediate operations, and the remaining 122 (81.3%) were initially treated with NOM. Compared with the initial NOM group, the immediate OP group had significantly lower hemoglobin levels, a higher incidence of tube thoracostomy, contrast extravasation and large hemoperitoneum on computed tomography, a higher injury severity score, increased need for transfusions, and longer length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospitalization. Further analysis of the initial NOM group indicated that NOM had failed in 6 (4.9%) cases. Compared with the s-NOM subgroup, f-NOM patients had significantly lower hemoglobin levels, more hospitalized transfusions, and longer ICU LOS.

Conclusions

NOM of high-grade BHSI in selected patients is a feasible strategy. Notwithstanding, patients with initial low hemoglobin level and a high number of blood transfusions in the ICU are associated with a high risk for NOM failure.