Complications in acute phase hospitalization of traumatic spinal cord injury: does surgical timing matter? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74:849-854. [PMID: 23425747 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31827e1381]

Impact of ultra-early, early and delayed decompression on neurological and clinical outcomes in spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the impact of various surgical timing strategies on neurological and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) through a meta-analysis. Specifically, it compares the effectiveness of early, ultra-early, and delayed decompression surgeries in optimizing patient recovery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to identify studies on surgical timing for SCI. Studies evaluating ultra-early surgery (≤8 h or ≤12 h), early surgery (≤24 h), and delayed surgery (>24 h) were included. A total of 16 studies were included, involving outcome indicators such as American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, length of stay, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with delayed surgery, early surgery (≤24 h) significantly shortened the length of stay (MD = -2.31 days, 95% CI: -4.18, -0.43; P = 0.02) and reduced the risk of complications (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.89; P = 0.003), but there was no significant difference in the improvement of ASIA score. Ultra-early surgery (≤8 h) significantly improved the ASIA score (OR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.40; P = 0.008), but no statistical difference was found in the comparison of 12 h. Early or delayed surgery did not affect the mortality of patients.

CONCLUSION

The timing of surgical intervention significantly influences recovery in SCI patients. Early and ultra-early surgery can shorten hospital stay, reduce the risk of complications, and improve neurological outcomes in some cases.

The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging, clinical findings, treatment modalities, and neurological outcomes in acute traumatic spinal cord injury in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to motor, sensory, or autonomic dysfunction and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical findings in the Emergency Department (ED) on neurological outcomes in patients with traumatic SCI.

METHODS

This observational study included 59 patients with traumatic SCI admitted to Dokuz Eylül University Hospital's ED between January 1 2009, and October 1, 2019. Clinical findings were assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale. Demographics, clinical findings, MRI parameters, treatment, and short-term (28 ± 7 days) neurological outcomes were compared between the complete (ASIA A) and incomplete (ASIA B, C, D, and E) injury groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of SCI was 98.7 per million. The median age was 37 years (IQR: 27-52), with 86.4% of the patients being male. Common causes included diving into shallow water (30.5%) and falling from heights (25.4%). Complete injury (ASIA A) was observed in 40.7% of cases, while incomplete injury (ASIA B, C, D, and E) was found in 59.3%. The most frequently affected levels were C4 (18.6%) and C5 (23.7%). No improvement was observed in the complete injury group, whereas 44% of the incomplete injury group showed improvement (P < 0.001). Common MRI findings included cord edema (96.6%), vertebral fracture/dislocation (86.4%), and soft-tissue injury (84.7%). Significant differences in MRI findings between the complete and incomplete SCI groups were observed in vertebral fracture/dislocation (P = 0.016), cord compression (P = 0.003), canal stenosis (P = 0.008), intramedullary hemorrhage (P ≤ 0.001), hemorrhage/hemorrhagic contusion (P ≤ 0.001), anterior ligament damage (P = 0.001), posterior ligament damage (P = 0.01), maximum canal compression (MCC) (P = 0.006), and lesion length (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Traumatic SCI primarily affects young males, often resulting from activities such as diving into shallow water, falls from heights, and motor vehicle accidents. Initial clinical assessments are insufficient for predicting neurological outcomes. Although MRI findings are more frequent in complete SCI, lesion length, and MCC do not reliably predict short-term neurological improvement.

Risk Factors and Consequences of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections in Patients with Traumatic Cervical Cord Injury: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

There is a lack of research on the relationship between cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) surgery and symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs); hence, this study seeks to fill this critical knowledge gap in postoperative care. This study aims to identify the risk factors for UTIs in patients with traumatic cervical SCI.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 187 patients (mean age: 68 years) who underwent cervical SCI surgery between 2017 and 2021. Patients were categorized into UTI and non-UTI groups. Patients with recurrent UTIs were defined as the multiple-UTI group. Preoperative risk factors, including prognostic nutritional index (PNI; 10×serum albumin [g/dL]+0.005×total lymphocyte count [/μL]), were assessed.

Results

Among 187 patients, 99 (52.9%) experienced a UTI within 90 days postoperatively. The majority of patients in the UTI group, that is, 92 patients (92.9%), had an indwelling catheter as urinary management at the time of the UTI. The UTI group faced higher rates of cardiopulmonary dysfunction, bacteremia, longer hospital stays, and increased medical costs. Multiple UTIs were associated with worse outcomes, including increased complications, longer hospital stays, and higher medical costs. PNI at 3 weeks and 4 weeks postoperatively in the multiple-UTI group was significantly lower than in the single-UTI and non-UTI groups. The American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale grade at admission was independently linked to initial UTI occurrence within 90 days after surgery when adjusting for confounding variables.

Conclusions

We found that 52.9% of patients experienced UTIs within 90 days postoperatively. The risk factors for UTI occurrence included the severity of paralysis, indwelling catheter, and poor improvement in the perioperative nutritional status. Early interventions with intermittent catheterization, appropriate antibiotics, and nutrition might be suggested for patients with severe cervical SCI and malnutrition.

Microbubble Contrast-Enhanced Transcutaneous Ultrasound Enables Real-Time Spinal Cord Perfusion Monitoring Following Posterior Cervical Decompression

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound imaging is inexpensive, portable, and widely available. The development of a real-time transcutaneous spinal cord perfusion monitoring system would allow more precise targeting of mean arterial pressure goals following acute spinal cord injury (SCI). There has been no prior demonstration of successful real-time cord perfusion monitoring in humans.

METHODS

Four adult patients who had undergone posterior cervical decompression and instrumentation at a single center were enrolled into this prospective feasibility study. All participants had undergone cervical laminectomies spanning ≥2 contiguous levels ≥2 months prior to inclusion with no history of SCI. The first 2 underwent transcutaneous ultrasound without contrast and the second 2 underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with intravenously injected microbubble contrast.

RESULTS

Using noncontrast ultrasound with or without Doppler (n = 2), the dura, spinal cord, and vertebral bodies were apparent however ultrasonography was insufficient to discern intramedullary perfusion or clear white-gray matter differentiation. With application of microbubble contrast (n = 2), it was possible to quantify differential spinal cord perfusion within and between cross-sectional regions of the cord. Further, it was possible to quantify spinal cord hemodynamic perfusion using CEUS by measuring peak signal intensity and the time to peak signal intensity after microbubble contrast injection. Time-intensity curves were generated and area under the curves were calculated as a marker of tissue perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is a viable platform for monitoring real-time cord perfusion in patients who have undergone prior cervical laminectomies. Further development has the potential to change clinical management acute SCI by tailoring treatments to measured tissue perfusion parameters.

An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical practice guideline development.

OBJECTIVES

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in devastating motor, sensory, and autonomic impairment; loss of independence; and reduced quality of life. Preclinical evidence suggests that early decompression of the spinal cord may help to limit secondary injury, reduce damage to the neural tissue, and improve functional outcomes. Emerging evidence indicates that "early" surgical decompression completed within 24 hours of injury also improves neurological recovery in patients with acute SCI. The objective of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to update the 2017 recommendations on the timing of surgical decompression and to evaluate the evidence with respect to ultra-early surgery (in particular, but not limited to, <12 hours after acute SCI).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary, international, guideline development group (GDG) was formed that consisted of spine surgeons, neurologists, critical care specialists, emergency medicine doctors, physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals, as well as individuals living with SCI. A systematic review was conducted based on accepted methodological standards to evaluate the impact of early (within 24 hours of acute SCI) or ultra-early (in particular, but not limited to, within 12 hours of acute SCI) surgery on neurological recovery, functional outcomes, administrative outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The GRADE approach was used to rate the overall strength of evidence across studies for each primary outcome. Using the "evidence-to-recommendation" framework, recommendations were then developed that considered the balance of benefits and harms, financial impact, patient values, acceptability, and feasibility. The guideline was internally appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

RESULTS

The GDG recommended that early surgery (≤24 hours after injury) be offered as the preferred option for adult patients with acute SCI regardless of level. This recommendation was based on moderate evidence suggesting that patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) grades at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, patients undergoing early surgery improved by an additional 4.50 (95% 1.70 to 7.29) points on the ASIA Motor Score compared to patients undergoing surgery after 24 hours post-injury. The GDG also agreed that a recommendation for ultra-early surgery could not be made on the basis of the current evidence because of the small sample sizes, variable definitions of what constituted ultra-early in the literature, and the inconsistency of the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that patients with an acute SCI, regardless of level, undergo surgery within 24 hours after injury when medically feasible. Future research is required to determine the differential effectiveness of early surgery in different subpopulations and the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological recovery. Moreover, further work is required to define what constitutes effective spinal cord decompression and to individualize care. It is also recognized that a concerted international effort will be required to translate these recommendations into policy.

Timing of Decompressive Surgery in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review Update

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Surgical decompression is a cornerstone in the management of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI); however, the influence of the timing of surgery on neurological recovery after acute SCI remains controversial. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of early (≤24 hours) or late (>24 hours) surgery in patients with acute traumatic SCI for all levels of the spine. Furthermore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery (earlier than 24 hours from injury) on these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE database (PubMed), Cochrane database, and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently screened the citations from the search to determine whether an article satisfied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. For all key questions, we focused on primary studies with the least potential for bias and those that controlled for baseline neurological status and specified time from injury to surgery. Risk of bias of each article was assessed using standardized tools based on study design. Finally, the overall strength of evidence for the primary outcomes was assessed using the GRADE approach. Data were synthesized both qualitatively and quantitively using meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and formed the evidence base for this review update. Seventeen studies compared outcomes between patients treated with early (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) surgical decompression. An additional 4 studies evaluated even earlier time frames: <4, <5, <8 or <12 hours. Based on moderate evidence, patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 grades on the ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, moderate evidence suggested that patients receiving early decompression had an additional 4.50 (95% CI 1.70 to 7.29) point improvement on the ASIA motor score. With respect to administrative outcomes, there was low evidence that early decompression may decrease acute hospital length of stay. In terms of safety, there was moderate evidence that suggested the rate of major complications does not differ between patients undergoing early compared to late surgery. Furthermore, there was no difference in rates of mortality, surgical device-related complications, sepsis/systemic infection or neurological deterioration based on timing of surgery. Firm conclusions were not possible with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological, functional or safety outcomes given the poor-quality studies, imprecision and the overlap in the time frames examined.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides an evidence base to support the update on clinical practice guidelines related to the timing of surgical decompression in acute SCI. Overall, the strength of evidence was moderate that early surgery (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) results in clinically meaningful improvements in neurological recovery. Further studies are required to delineate the role of ultra-early surgery in patients with acute SCI.

A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a global health problem with a heavy economic burden. Surgery is considered as the cornerstone of SCI treatment. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for SCI, the methodological quality of these guidelines has still not been critically appraised.

PURPOSE

We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SCI and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, and online guideline databases were searched from January 2000 to January 2022. The most updated and recent guidelines containing evidence-based or consensus-based recommendations and established by authoritative associations were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2nd edition instrument containing 6 domains (eg, applicability) was used to appraise the included guidelines. An evidence-grading scale (ie, level of evidence, LOE) was utilized to evaluate the quality of supporting evidence. The supporting evidence was categorized as A (the best quality), B, C, and D (the worst quality).

RESULTS

Ten guidelines from 2008 to 2020 were included, however, all of them acquired the lowest scores in the domain of applicability among all the six domains. Fourteen recommendations (eight evidence-based recommendations and six consensus-based recommendations) were totally involved. The SCI types of the population and timing of surgery were studied. Regarding the SCI types of the population, eight guidelines (8/10, 80%), two guidelines (2/10, 20%), and three guidelines (3/10, 30%) recommended surgical treatment for patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, incomplete SCI, and traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS), respectively. Besides, one guideline (1/10, 10%) recommended against surgery for patients with SCI without radiographic abnormality. Regarding the timing of surgery, there were eight guidelines (8/10, 80%), two guidelines (2/10, 20%), and two guidelines (2/10, 20%) with recommendations for patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, incomplete SCI, and TCCS, respectively. For patients with SCI without further clarification of characteristics, all eight guidelines (8/8, 100%) recommended for early surgery and five guidelines (5/8, 62.5%) recommended for the specific timing, which ranged from within 8 hours to within 48 hours. For patients with incomplete SCI, two guidelines (2/2, 100%) recommended for early surgery, without specific time thresholds. For patients with TCCS, one guideline (1/2, 50%) recommended for surgery within 24 hours, and another guideline (1/2, 50%) simply recommended for early surgery. The LOE was B in eight recommendations, C in three recommendations, and D in three recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

We remind the reader that even the highest quality guidelines often have significant flaws (eg, poor applicability), and some of the conclusions are based on consensus recommendations which is certainly less than ideal. With these caveats, we found most included guidelines (8/10, 80%) recommended early surgical treatment for patients after SCI, which was consistent between evidence-based recommendations and consensus-based recommendations. Regarding the specific timing of surgery, the recommended time threshold did vary, but it was usually within 8 to 48 hours, where the LOE was B to D.

Complications Associated with Preventive Management to Reduce the Risk of COVID-19 Spread After Surgery for Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND

Preventive management to reduce the risk of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) spread led to delays in active rehabilitation, which may have negatively impacted the outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the influence of preventive management on the rate of perioperative complications after surgical treatment for SCI.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study examined the cases of 175 patients who had SCI surgery between 2017 and 2021. We could not continue early rehabilitation interventions starting on April 30, 2020, because of our preventive management to reduce the risk of COVID-19 spread. Using a propensity score-matched model, we adjusted for age, sex, American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale score at admission, and risk factors for perioperative complications described in previous studies. Perioperative complication rates were compared between the COVID-19 pandemic and prepandemic groups.

RESULTS

Of the 175 patients, 48 (the pandemic group) received preventive management. The preliminary analysis revealed significant differences between the unmatched pandemic and prepandemic groups with respect to age (75.0 versus 71.2 years, respectively; p = 0.024) and intraoperative estimated blood loss (152 versus 227 mL; p = 0.013). The pandemic group showed significant delays in visiting the rehabilitation room compared with the prepandemic group (10 versus 4 days from hospital admission; p < 0.001). There were significant differences between the pandemic and prepandemic groups with respect to the rates of pneumonia (31% versus 16%; p = 0.022), cardiopulmonary dysfunction (38% versus 18%; p = 0.007), and delirium (33% versus 13%; p = 0.003). With a propensity score-matched analysis (C-statistic = 0.90), 30 patients in the pandemic group and 60 patients in the prepandemic group were automatically selected. There were significant differences between the matched pandemic and prepandemic groups with respect to the rates of cardiopulmonary dysfunction (47% versus 23%; p = 0.024) and deep venous thrombosis (60% versus 35%; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Even with early surgical intervention, late mobilization and delays in active rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic increased perioperative complications after SCI surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Occurrences in the Neurorehabilitation of Dogs with Severe Spinal Cord Injury

This prospective observational clinical study in a population of tetraplegic and paraplegic dogs (n = 488) with or without deep pain sensation, similar to humans ASIA A and B, investigated the prevalence of clinical occurrences in a rehabilitation center with a hospitalization regime between 15 days and 9 months. A checklist of occurrences was used for easy identification and monitoring, resulting in a total of 79.5% occurrences. There were 58% of dogs with neurogenic bladder, 35.5% with diarrhea, 21.3% with urinary incontinence, and 20.5% with fecal incontinence. A low incidence of respiratory problems (e.g., pneumonia) and urinary tract infections may suggest the efficacy of some applied measures in this study, such as thoracic and abdominal POCUS evaluation, positioning strategies, physical exercises, respiratory kinesiotherapy, and early implementation of a functional neurorehabilitation protocol. These can be essential measures to prevent clinical occurrences, mainly in breeds such as the French Bulldog and the Dachshund.

Time to Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Meta-Analysis of the World's Literature Comparing High-Income Countries to Low-Middle Income Countries

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to: 1) compare time from traumatic spinal injury (TSI) to operating room (OR) in high-income countries (HICs) versus low-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 2) evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) in HICs versus LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving articles of all languages.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

published between 1991 and 2021, spine trauma population, single country/region, and recorded time from injury to OR. The primary outcome was time from injury to OR, and the secondary outcome was LOS. Means and standard deviations were estimated in a random effects model by DerSimonian and Laird methods.

RESULTS

Of 2367 articles, 163 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Regarding time from injury to OR, 23 articles were eligible for meta-analysis; 16 studies were conducted in HICs and 7 in LMICs, comprising 3819 patients with TSI. A significantly shorter mean time from injury to OR was found in HICs (1.92 days, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.41) compared with LMICs (3.27 days, 95% confidence interval 2.27-4.27) (P = 0.020). Regarding length of stay, 14 articles were eligible for meta-analysis, 10 studies were conducted in HICs and 4 in LMICs, comprising 11,003 patients. There was no difference in LOS between HICs and LMICs (25.76 days vs. 20.48 days, P = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic spinal injuries in HICs were more likely to undergo earlier surgery compared to patients in LMICs. No difference was found in total LOS between HICs and LMICs. While multiple factors can influence time to surgery, these findings draw attention to the global disparity in spinal trauma care.

Current epidemiological profile and characteristics of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in Nanchang, China

STUDY DESIGN

A hospital-based retrospective epidemiological study.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the recent epidemiological profile and characteristics of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI) in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.

SETTING

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

METHODS

We retrieved the medical records of 1290 persons with TCSCI admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2012 and December 2018. The characteristics recorded were age, sex, aetiology of the injury, neurological level, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, patient source, and associated trauma. Categorical data were reported as frequency and proportions and compared using the Fisher's exact or Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 1290 persons with TCSCI were included in the present study. The largest age group was 46-60 years, accounting for 31.6% of the patients; the mean age was 53.1 ± 16.2 years, and the male/female ratio was 7.06:1. More than 87.4% of persons were transferred from a primary or secondary hospital. The leading cause of injury was motor vehicle collision (41.3%), followed by low fall (26.5%). The most common cervical spine injury level was the C5 segment, accounting for 24.3% of cases. As for severity, ASIA grade D was encountered most frequently, with a total of 518 persons (40.2%). Among all participants, 56.8% had associated trauma, the most common being head injuries (18.2%). Surgery was the major treatment choice (51.2%), and the number of patients undergoing surgery is increasing from 2012 to 2018, P = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

Persons with TCSCI in Nanchang had specific epidemiological characteristics, and preventive measures should focus on middle-aged and older adults. In addition, more attention should be paid to balancing development of medical resources and technology between urban and rural areas.

Development of a machine learning algorithm for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality after traumatic spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Current prognostic tools such as the Injury Severity Score (ISS) that predict mortality following trauma do not adequately consider the unique characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI).

PURPOSE

Our aim was to develop and validate a prognostic tool that can predict mortality following tSCI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Data was collected from 1245 persons with acute tSCI who were enrolled in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry between 2004 and 2016.

OUTCOME MEASURES

In-hospital and 1-year mortality following tSCI.

METHODS

Machine learning techniques were used on patient-level data (n=849) to develop the Spinal Cord Injury Risk Score (SCIRS) that can predict mortality based on age, neurological level and completeness of injury, AOSpine classification of spinal column injury morphology, and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Validation of the SCIRS was performed by testing its accuracy in an independent validation cohort (n=396) and comparing its performance to the ISS, a measure which is used to predict mortality following general trauma.

RESULTS

For 1-year mortality prediction, the values for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for the development cohort were 0.84 (standard deviation=0.029) for the SCIRS and 0.55 (0.041) for the ISS. For the validation cohort, AUC values were 0.86 (0.051) for the SCIRS and 0.71 (0.074) for the ISS. For in-hospital mortality, AUC values for the development cohort were 0.87 (0.028) and 0.60 (0.050) for the SCIRS and ISS, respectively. For the validation cohort, AUC values were 0.85 (0.054) for the SCIRS and 0.70 (0.079) for the ISS.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCIRS can predict in-hospital and 1-year mortality following tSCI more accurately than the ISS. The SCIRS can be used in research to reduce bias in estimating parameters and can help adjust for coefficients during model development. Further validation using larger sample sizes and independent datasets is needed to assess its reliability and to evaluate using it as an assessment tool to guide clinical decision-making and discussions with patients and families.

Cervical Spine Injuries with Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Surgery Adverse Events and Their Association with Neurological and Functional Outcome

STUDY DESIGN

Monocenter case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

Effects of spinal surgical adverse events (SSAE) on clinical and functional outcome, length of stay, and treatment costs after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traumatic SCI is a challenge for primary care centers because of the emergency setting and complex injury patterns. SSAE rates of up to 15% are reported for spine fractures without SCI. Little is known about SSAE after traumatic SCI and their outcome relevance.

METHODS

Acute traumatic cervical SCI patients were enrolled from 2011 to 2017. Cases with and without SSAE were compared regarding neurological recovery, functional outcome, secondary complications, mortality, length of stay, and treatment costs. Adjusted logistic regression and generalized estimating equation models were calculated for the endpoints ASIA impairment scale (AIS)-conversion and dysphagia. All analyses were run in the total and in a propensity score matched sample.

RESULTS

At least one SSAE occurred in 37 of 165 patients (22.4%). Mechanical instability and insufficient spinal decompression were the most frequent SSAE with 13 (7.9%) or 11 (6.7%) cases, respectively. The regression models adjusted for demographic, injury, and surgery characteristics demonstrated a reduced probability for AIS-conversion related to SSAE (OR [95% CI] 0.14 [0.03-0.74]) and additionally to single-sided ventral or dorsal surgical approach (0.12 [0.02-0.69]) in the matched sample. Furthermore, SSAE were associated with higher risk for dysphagia in the matched (4.77 [1.31-17.38]) and the total sample (5.96 [2.07-17.18]). Primary care costs were higher in cases with SSAE (median (interquartile range) 97,300 [78,200-112,300]) EUR compared with cases without SSAE (52,300 [26,700-91,200]) EUR.

CONCLUSION

SSAE are an important risk factor after acute traumatic cervical SCI with impact on neurological recovery, functional outcome, and healthcare costs. Reducing SSAE is a viable means to protect the limited intrinsic capacity for recovery from SCI.Level of Evidence: 4.

Management of Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Literature

Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a debilitating disease that poses significant functional and economic burden on both the individual and societal levels. Prognosis is dependent on the extent of the spinal injury and the severity of neurological dysfunction. If not treated rapidly, patients with TSCI can suffer further secondary damage and experience escalating disability and complications. It is important to quickly assess the patient to identify the location and severity of injury to make a decision to pursue a surgical and/or conservative management. However, there are many conditions that factor into the management of TSCI patients, ranging from the initial presentation of the patient to long-term care for optimal recovery. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the etiologies of spinal cord injury and the complications that may arise, and present an algorithm to aid in the management of TSCI.

Decreasing pressure injuries and acute care length of stay in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

Identifying factors associated with the occurrence of pressure injuries (PI) during acute care and with longer length of stay (LOS), focusing on modifiable factors that can be addressed and optimized by the acute rehabilitation team.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single Level-1 trauma center specialized in SCI care.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 301 patients with acute TSCI was studied.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the occurrence of PI during acute care stay. The secondary outcome was acute care LOS. Bivariate and multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses were performed to determine the association between non-modifiable factors and outcomes (PI of any stage and acute LOS), whereas bivariate and hierarchical multivariate logistic or linear regression analyses were used for modifiable factors.

RESULTS

When controlling for the level and severity of the TSCI, the occurrence of pneumonia (OR = 2.1, CI = 1.1-4.1) was significantly associated with the occurrence of PI. When controlling for the level and severity of the TSCI, the occurrence of medical complications (PI, urinary tract infection and pneumonia) and lesser daily therapy resulted in significantly longer acute care LOS (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention of PI occurrence and the optimization of the acute care LOS represent crucial challenges of the acute rehabilitation team, as they are significantly associated with higher functional outcomes. Patients who develop pneumonia may benefit from more aggressive prevention strategies to reduce PI occurrence. Systematic protocols for the prevention of complications as well as greater volume of therapy interventions should be considered to optimize the acute care LOS.

Early versus Delayed Surgery for Acute Traumatic Cervical/Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury in Beijing, China: The Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of early surgery (within 24 h) and delayed surgery on the outcomes of patients with acute cervical/thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) in Beijing, China.

METHODS

We conducted a clinical trial involving patients who were aged 16-85 years, had acute SCI from 1 June 2016 to 1 June 2019 in Beijing. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the timing of surgical decompression. The primary outcome was the ordinal change in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade. The secondary outcomes included the surgical time, volume of surgical bleeding, rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay in the ICU, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. And the time consumption of different phases before operation was recorded for the patients transported to hospital by ambulance.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients were included in the study, including 55 in the early surgery group and 93 in the delayed surgery group. At 52 weeks post-surgery, 27.3% of the patients in the early surgery group showed AIS improvement by at least two grades, compared to 8.7% of the patients in the delayed surgery group (P = 0.102). According to the logistic regression analysis, the odds of at least a two-grade AIS improvement was six times higher among the patients who underwent early surgery than among those who underwent delayed surgery (OR = 6.66, 95%CI 1.14-38.84). The delay surgery group consumed significantly more time in the phases of transfer and inspection or examination than the early surgery group, and the Chinese regional trauma treatment system was widely used in the early surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Decompression within 24 h after SCI can improve patients' recovery of neurological function without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications and surgical risks. The Chinese regional trauma treatment system can improve the diagnosis and treatment efficiency of patients with acute SCI and speed up the operation timing.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are a devastating condition and can lead to severe functional and psychosocial problems. However, the influence of the timing of the surgical intervention for acute SCI remains debated, with substantial variability in clinical practice. Thus, this study aims to compare the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute SCI.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to January 10, 2021 was conducted for relevant studies that compared early and late acute SCI. Neurological outcomes were assessed by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Early surgery was defined as the surgical intervention within 24 h after spinal injury. The primary outcome was the change of ASIA score from baseline to follow-up time after spinal injury. Second primary outcomes were clinical outcomes including neurological improvement rate, mortality, length of stay (LOS), charges ($), complications and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS). All statistical analyses were performed using standard statistical procedures provided in Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies including 3977 SCI patients were identified finally. Our pooled results indicated that, compared with late surgery, patients who underwent early surgery experienced more ASIA score improvement, with pooled MDs of 2.32 points (95% CI 1.07-3.57; P = 0.0003) in total motor scores, 5.13 points (95% CI 3.94-6.32; P < 0.0001) in light touch scores, and 4.49 points (95% CI 2.22-6.76; P = 0.0001) in pin prick scores respectively. In addition, patients receiving early surgery experienced more total motor score after surgery (MD 3.30; 95% CI 0.82-5.79; P = 0.009). Patients who had early surgery also had higher neurological improvement rate (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.19-2.31; P = 0.003), shorter LOS (MD -4.77; 95% CI -7.42 to -2.12), less charges ($) (MD -0.33; 95% CI -0.43 to -0.22), lower incidence of complications (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.81), and higher AIS improvement rate (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.20-2.44) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with late surgery, acute SCI patients who underwent early surgery experienced greater recovery after spinal injury, with better neurological improvement, shorter LOS, less charges and lower incidence of complications.

Injury characteristics, initial clinical status, and severe injuries associated with spinal fractures in a retrospective cohort of 506 trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to describe the characteristics of vertebral fractures, the presence of associated injuries, and clinical status within the first days in a severe trauma population.

METHODS

All patients with severe trauma admitted to our level 1 trauma center between January 2015 and December 2018 with a vertebral fracture were analyzed retrospectively. The fractures were determined by the AO Spine classification as stable (A0, A1, and A2 types) or unstable (A3, A4, B, and C types). Clinical status was defined as stable, intermediate, or unstable based on clinicobiological parameters and anatomic injuries. Severe extraspinal injuries and emergent procedures were studied. Three groups were compared: stable fracture, unstable fracture, and spinal cord injury (SCI) group.

RESULTS

A total of 425 patients were included (mean ± SD age, 43.8 ± 19.6 years; median Injury Severity Score, 22 [interquartile range, 17-34]; 72% male); 72 (17%) in the SCI group, 116 (27%) in the unstable fracture group, and 237 (56%) in the stable fracture group; 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57-67%) had not a stable clinical status on admission (unstable, 30%; intermediate, 32%), regardless of the group (p = 0.38). This decreased to 31% (95% CI, 27-35%) on day 3 and 23% (95% CI, 19-27%) on day 5, regardless of the group (p = 0.27 and p = 0.25). Progression toward stable clinical status between D1 and D5 was 63% (95% CI, 58-68%) overall but was statistically lower in the SCI group. Severe extraspinal injuries (85% [95% CI, 82-89%]) and extraspinal emergent procedures (56% [95% CI, 52-61%]) were comparable between the three groups. Only abdominal injuries and hemostatic procedures significantly differed significantly (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

More than the half of the patients with severe trauma had altered initial clinical status or severe extraspinal injuries that were not compatible with safe early surgical management for the vertebral fracture. These observations were independent of the stability of the fracture or the presence of an SCI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Use of Regression Tree Analysis for Predicting the Functional Outcome after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Predicting the long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is needed to adapt medical strategies and plan an optimized rehabilitation. This study investigates the use of regression trees for the development of predictive models based on acute clinical and demographic predictors. This prospective study was performed on 172 patients hospitalized after TSCI. Functional outcome was quantified using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) collected within the first-year post-injury. Age, delay before surgery, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were considered as continuous predictors whereas energy of injury, trauma mechanisms, neurological level of injury, injury severity, occurrence of early spasticity, urinary tract infection, pressure ulcer, and pneumonia were coded as categorical inputs. A simplified model was built using only American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, neurological level, energy, and age as predictor and was compared to a more complex model considering all 11 predictors mentioned above. The models built using 4 and 11 predictors were found to explain 51.4% and 62.3% of the variance of the SCIM total score after validation, respectively. Severity of the neurological deficit at admission was found to be the most important predictor. Other important predictors were the ISS, age, neurological level, and delay before surgery. Regression trees offer promising performances for predicting the functional outcome after a TSCI. It could help to determine the number and type of predictors leading to a prediction model of the functional outcome that can be used clinically in the future.

Litigation risks despite guideline adherence for acute spinal cord injury: time is spine

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines do not specify timing for management of acute spinal cord injury (aSCI) due to lack of high-quality evidence supporting specific intervals for intervention. Randomized prospective trials may be unethical. Nonetheless, physicians have been sued for delays in diagnosis and intervention.

METHODS

The authors reviewed both the medical literature supporting the guidelines and the legal cases reported in the Westlaw and Lexis Advance databases from 1972 to 2018 resulting in awards or settlements, to identify whether surgeons are vulnerable to litigation despite the existence of guidelines not mandating specific timing of care.

RESULTS

Timing of intervention was related to claims in 59 (36%) of 163 cases involving SCI. All 22 trauma cases identified cited timing of intervention, sometimes related to delayed diagnosis, as a reason for the lawsuit. The mean award of 10 cases in which the plaintiffs' awards were disclosed was $4,294,384. In the majority of cases, award amounts were not disclosed.

CONCLUSIONS

Because conduct of a prospective, randomized trial to investigate surgical timing of intervention for aSCI may not be achievable, evidence-based guidelines will be unlikely to mandate specific timing. Nonetheless, surgeons who unreasonably delay intervention for aSCI may be at risk for litigation due to treatment delay. This is increasingly likely in an environment where "complete" SCI is difficult to verify. SCI may at some point be recognized as a surgical emergency, as brain injury generally is, despite a lack of prospective randomized trials supporting this implementation, challenging the feasibility of the US trauma infrastructure to provide care for these patients.

Timing of Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Injury: Impact on Neurological Outcome

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the improvement in neurological deficit following early versus late decompression and stabilization of thoracolumbar junctional fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective evaluation of all patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) from T11 to L2 treated at a teaching hospital between 2010 and 2017. Grouped analysis was performed comparing the cohort of patients who received early surgery within 24 hours (group 1) with those operated within 24 to 72 hours (group 2) and more than 72 hours after SCI (group 3). The primary outcome was the change in ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) motor score at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 317 patients (225 males and 92 females with mean age of 31.55 ± 12.43 years). A total of 144, 77, and 96 patients belonged to groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Improvement of at least 1 grade on ASIA classification was observed in 80, 45, and 33 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (P = .001). Overall, 32, 12, and 10 patients improved ≥2 grades on ASIA classification in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = .069). On logistic regression analysis, early surgery and severity of initial injury (complete [ASIA A] vs incomplete SCI [ASIA B-D]) were found to significantly influence the potential for neurologic improvement (P = .004 and P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We believe that the earlier the decompression, the better. The 72-hour cutoff represents the most promising time window during which surgical decompression has the potential to confer a neuroprotective effect in the setting of incomplete SCI (ASIA B-D) in the distal region of the spinal cord (conus medullaris).

Spinal clearance and management of spinal cord injury in the trauma patient

The British Orthopaedic Association's Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics outline the essential clinical standards for spinal clearance and management of spinal cord injury in the acute trauma patient. From initial presentation in the hospital setting to long-term rehabilitation, the recommendations for clinical assessment, imaging, treatment priorities and the role of trauma networks are summarised.

Impact of complications at admission to rehabilitation on the functional status of patients with spinal cord lesion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of complications at admission on the functional status of spinal cord lesions patients.

SETTING

Rehabilitation hospital in Italy.

METHODS

Two hundred and seven patients with complications (mostly pressure ulcers) at admission to rehabilitation were matched for neurological level of injury and AIS grade with 207 patients without complications.

MEASURES

International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Rivermead Mobility Index, and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury. These measures were recorded at admission to rehabilitation and at discharge. We also recorded length of acute and rehabilitation stay and discharge destination.

STATISTICS

Student's T test for paired samples, McNemar's chi-square test.

RESULTS

Patients with complications at admission suffered more often from a traumatic lesions. The functional status at admission and discharge of the patients without complications was significantly better than the functional status of patients with complications (Spinal Cord Independence Measure mean difference between the two groups 5.7 (CI 2.8-8.5) at admission, and 10 (CI 5.3-14.7) at discharge). Length of stay was significantly higher in patients with complications. Patients with complications were more often institutionalized than their counterparts (46/161 vs. 20/187, odds ratio 0.4 (CI 0.2-0.7)).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications seem to be more frequent in patients with traumatic lesions. The presence of complications has a negative effect on patients' functional status at discharge and length of stay, and it determines a higher risk of being institutionalized.

French recommendations for the management of patients with spinal cord injury or at risk of spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

To update the French guidelines on the management of trauma patients with spinal cord injury or suspected spinal cord injury.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 27 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

METHODS

The committee studied twelve questions: (1) What are the indications and arrangements for spinal immobilisation? (2) What are the arrangements for pre-hospital orotracheal intubation? (3) What are the objectives of haemodynamic resuscitation during the lesion assessment, and during the first few days in hospital? (4) What is the best way to manage these patients to improve their long-term prognosis? (5) What is the place of corticosteroid therapy in the initial phase? (6) What are the indications for magnetic resonance imaging in the lesion assessment phase? (7) What is the optimal time for surgical management? (8) What are the best arrangements for orotracheal intubation in the hospital environment? (9) What are the specific conditions for weaning these patients from mechanical ventilation for? (10) What are the procedures for analgesic treatment of these patients? (11) What are the specific arrangements for installing and mobilising these patients? (12) What is the place of early intermittent bladder sampling in these patients? Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® Methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' work synthesis and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the recommendations formalised, 2 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 5 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for the management of patients with spinal cord injury.

The Functional Impact of the Absence of a Bulbocavernosus Reflex in the Postoperative Period After a Motor-Complete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the absence of a bulbocavernosus reflex in the postoperative period on the neurological and functional recovery 6-12 mos after a motor-complete traumatic spinal cord injury.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of a prospective database was completed among 66 patients. The functional and neurological statuses between individuals with and without a bulbocavernosus reflex were compared. A general linear model was used to investigate the association between the postoperative bulbocavernosus reflex status and the functional outcome, using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure.

RESULTS

Forty percent of the cohort had no bulbocavernosus reflex 5 days after trauma. Individuals with a bulbocavernosus reflex showed a higher rate of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade conversion, improvement of the level of injury, and higher functional scores; however, it did not reach a significant level. The bulbocavernosus reflex status in the postoperative period was not significantly associated with the functional status 6-12 mos after injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Late recovery of the bulbocavernosus reflex in the postoperative period may be associated with poorer neurological and functional outcome for individuals sustaining a motor-complete traumatic spinal cord injury, for which the prognosis estimation is limited. A prospective study including a larger number of patients is necessary to confirm results of this study.

Prolonged use of spinal precautions is associated with increased morbidity in the trauma patient

BACKGROUND

Patients who experience traumatic spine injuries remain in spinal precautions (SP) to minimize the risk of devastating cord injury while awaiting definitive management. This study examines the incidence of pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary embolism (PE) in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

From 2014 to 2016, 344 patients aged 18 and older with spinal column injuries were identified in a prospectively-collected registry at an urban, level 1 trauma center. After exclusion criteria, 330 patients were reviewed and the following were analyzed: demographics, duration of SP, time to intervention, and rates of PNA, UTI, and DVT or PE. Those patients kept in SP for ≤ 72 h ("prolonged") were compared to patients maintained in SP for > 72 h ("early").

RESULTS

Mean age was 54.6 years (SD, 21.7), median Injury Severity Score (ISS) 10 (IQR, 5-17). The median SP was 4.0 (IQR, 3.0-6.0) days. Fifty-eight (17.6%) patients underwent fixation and 170 (51.5%) received a brace. 102 (30.9%) patients initially awaiting a brace were cleared after MRI. 93 (28.2) patients suffered one of the tracked complications; 51 (15.5%) developed PNA, 35 (10.6%) UTI, 23 (7.0%) DVT, and 5 (1.5%) PE. Rate of overall complications between patients with SP ≤ 72 h versus patients with SP > 72 h was statistically significant (20.5% vs 34.6%, p = 0.005) as was the incidence of UTI (14.5 vs 6.0, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged SP (>72 h) is associated with increased rates of immobility-associated morbidities. Focus should be on prompt, definitive care and early mobilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data.

Sarcopenia, but not frailty, predicts early mortality and adverse events after emergent surgery for metastatic disease of the spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Frailty and sarcopenia variably predict adverse events (AEs) in a number of surgical populations.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of frailty and sarcopenia to independently predict early mortality and AEs following urgent surgery for metastatic disease of the spine.

STUDY DESIGN

A single institution, retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred eight patients undergoing urgent surgery for spinal metastases from 2009 to 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of AEs including 1- and 3-month mortality.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was defined using the L3 Total Psoas Area/Vertebral body Area (L3-TPA/VB) technique on CT. The modified Frailty Index (mFI), Metastatic Frailty Index (MSTFI) and the Bollen prognostic scales were calculated for each patient. Additional data included demographics, tumor type and burden, neurological status, the extent of surgical treatment and the use of radiation-therapy. Spearman correlation test, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier were used to study the relation between the outcomes measures and potential predictors (L3-TPA/VB, MSTFI, mFI, and the Bollen prognostic scales).

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of patients had at least one acute AE. Sarcopenia predicted the occurrence of at least one postop AE (L3-TPA/VB, 1.07±0.40 vs. 1.25±0.52; p=.031). Sarcopenia (L3-TPA/VB) and the degree of neurological impairment were predictive of postoperative AE but MFI or MSTFI were not. Sarcopenia predicted 3-month mortality, independent of primary tumor type (L3-TPA/VB: 0.86±0.27 vs. 1.12±0.41; p<.001). Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed L3-TPA/VB and the Bollen Scale to significantly discriminate patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, easily measured by the L3-TPA/VB on conventional CT, predicts both early postoperative mortality and adverse events in patients undergoing urgent surgery for spinal metastasis, thus providing a practical tool for timely therapeutic decision-making in this complex patient population.

Acute Adverse Events After Spinal Cord Injury and Their Relationship to Long-term Neurologic and Functional Outcomes: Analysis From the North American Clinical Trials Network for Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES

There are few contemporary, prospective multicenter series on the spectrum of acute adverse events and their relationship to long-term outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury. The goal of this study is to assess the prevalence of adverse events after traumatic spinal cord injury and to evaluate the effects on long-term clinical outcome.

DESIGN

Multicenter prospective registry.

SETTING

Consortium of 11 university-affiliated medical centers in the North American Clinical Trials Network.

PATIENTS

Eight-hundred one spinal cord injury patients enrolled by participating centers.

INTERVENTIONS

Appropriate spinal cord injury treatment at individual centers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 2,303 adverse events were recorded for 502 patients (63%). Penalized maximum logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the likelihood of neurologic recovery (ASIA Impairment Scale improvement ≥ 1 grade point) and functional outcomes in subjects who developed adverse events at 6 months postinjury. After accounting for potential confounders, the group that developed adverse events showed less neurologic recovery (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.96) and was more likely to require assisted breathing (odds ratio, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.17-36.67); dependent ambulation (odds ratio, 7.38; 95% CI, 4.35-13.06) and have impaired bladder (odds ratio, 9.63; 95% CI, 5.19-17.87) or bowel function (odds ratio, 7.86; 95% CI, 4.31-14.32) measured using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure subscores.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this contemporary series demonstrate that acute adverse events are common and are associated with worsened long-term outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Association of Pneumonia, Wound Infection, and Sepsis with Clinical Outcomes after Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

 < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between participants with or without PWS with respect to time from injury to surgery, and administration of steroids. Dominance analysis showed injury level, baseline AIS grade, and subject pre-morbid medical status collectively accounted for 77.7% of the predicted variance of PWS. Regression analysis indicated subjects with PWS demonstrated higher odds for respiratory (odds ratio [OR] 3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-10.79) and ambulatory (OR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.50-10.38) support at 6 month follow-up in adjusted analysis. This study has shown an association between PWS occurring during acute admission and poorer functional outcomes following SCI.

Analysis of risk factors for hyponatremia in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a retrospective single-institution study in Japan

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-institution observational study.

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with a high prevalence of hyponatremia, which can cause various clinical symptoms and increase mortality. We aimed to analyze the risk factors for hyponatremia in patients with acute SCI.

SETTING

Trauma Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Japan METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with SCI admitted between January 2008 and November 2016. Least angle regression analyses was performed to assess the association between hyponatremia and other parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 213 enrolled patients, 85 (40%) had hyponatremia (serum Na < 135 mmol/L) whilst 19 (9%) had severe hyponatremia (serum Na < 130 mmol/L). Least angle regression analyses revealed that hyponatremia was significantly associated with higher American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, nosocomial pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, bradycardia, and surgery for SCI before developing hyponatremia. Severe hyponatremia was significantly associated with traumatic brain injury with an abbreviated injury scale score ≥3, higher American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, bradycardia, vasopressors, and nosocomial pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

Various factors including traumatic brain injury with an abbreviated injury scale score ≥3 and higher American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale may be associated with hyponatremia in patients with acute SCI. These factors can help clinicians identify and monitor SCI patients with a higher hyponatremia risk, and potentially help patients to avoid severe complications.

Early (≤48 Hours) versus Late (>48 Hours) Surgery in Spinal Cord Injury: Treatment Outcomes and Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVES

Surgical management of spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging. There is no standard guideline regarding the timing of surgery, although physicians have prioritized early surgery over the past decades. Although better outcomes have been observed from these studies, the definition of early surgery has been controversial, although mostly limited to 24-hours after injury. For some hospitals, this early surgery could be difficult to implement in practice. Hence, we re-evaluated the timing of early surgery as surgery within 48 hours and investigated the surgical outcomes of SCI depending on whether surgery was performed early (≤48 hours) or late (>48 hours). The primary outcomes were improvement in the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade in early and late surgery groups.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study in individuals aged 15-85 years, who underwent surgery for SCI between 2005 and 2016. The rate of AIS grade improvements was measured at 6 months after injury. Of the 86 enrolled patients, 31 (mean, 40.9 ± 12.64 hours) and 55 (mean, 168.25 ± 93.01 hours) patients were assigned to the early and late surgery groups, respectively.

RESULTS

AIS grade improvement was significantly greater in the early than in the late group (P = 0.039). In the early group, there was no significant difference in neurologic improvements among the AIS B, C, and D groups, but the AIS A group showed a significant improvement (P = 0.015). This finding was not observed in the late group (P = 0.060). AIS grade improvement was also significantly greater in the incomplete SCI group than in the complete SCI group, for all measurements (early, P = 0.007, late, P = 0.009). Other factors that significantly affected clinical outcomes were AIS grade on admission and the level of the injury.

The impact of acute management on the occurrence of medical complications during the specialized spinal cord injury acute hospitalization following motor-complete cervical spinal cord injury

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

Determine the impact of early admission and complete perioperative management in a specialized spinal cord injury (SCI) trauma center (SCI-center) on the occurrence of medical complications following tetraplegia.

DESIGN

A retrospective comparative cohort study of prospectively collected data involving 116 individuals was conducted. Group 1 (N=87) was early managed in a SCI-center promptly after the trauma, whereas Group 2 (N=29) was surgically and preoperatively managed in a non-specialized (NS) center before being transferred to the SCI-center. Bivariate comparisons and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between the type of acute care facility and the occurrence of medical complications. Length of stay (LOS) in acute care was also compared.

SETTING

Single Level-1 trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with acute traumatic motor-complete cervical SCI.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable Outcome measures: The occurrence of complications during the SCI-center stay.

RESULTS

There was a similar rate of complications between the two groups. However, the LOS was greater in Group 2 (p=0.04). High cervical injuries (C1-C4) showed an important tendency to increase the likelihood of developing a complication, while high cervical injuries and increased trauma severity increased the odds of developing respiratory complications.

CONCLUSION

Although complication rates were similar in non-specialized and specialized centers, peri-operative management in a non-specialized center required a longer length of stay. Prompt transfer to a SCI-center may optimize the care trajectory by favoring earlier transfer to rehabilitation.

Early Predictors of Global Functional Outcome after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Accurately predicting functional recovery is an asset for all clinicians and decision makers involved in the care of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). Unfortunately, there is a lack of information on the relative importance of significant predictors of global functional outcome. There is also a need for identifying functional predictors that can be timely optimized by the medical and rehabilitation teams throughout the hospitalizations phases. The main objective of this work was to systematically review and rate early factors that are consistently and independently associated with global functional outcome in individuals with TSCI. A literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1970 to April 1, 2017 was performed. Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts yielded by this literature search and subsequently selected studies to be included based on predetermined eligibility criteria. Disagreements were resolved by a consensus-based discussion, and if not, by an external reviewer. Data were extracted by three independent reviewers using a standardized table. The quality of evidence of the individual studies was assessed based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine modified by Wright and colleagues (2000) as well as the National Institutes of Health (2014). Fifteen articles identifying early clinical predictors of functional outcome using multiple regression analyses were included in this systematic review. Based on the compiled data, this review proposes a rating of early factors associated to global functional outcome according to their importance and their potential to be modified by the medical/rehabilitation team throughout the early phases of hospitalization. It also proposes a new conceptual framework that illustrates the impact of specific categories of factors and their interaction with each other. Ultimately, this review aims to guide clinicians and researchers in improving the continuum of care throughout early phases post-SCI.

Surgical management of patients following traumatic spinal cord injury: Identifying barriers to early surgery in a specialized spinal cord injury center

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

Early surgery in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (T-SCI) can improve neurological recovery and reduce complications, costs and hospitalization. Patient-related and healthcare-related factors could influence surgical delay. This study aimed at determining factors contributing to surgical delay in individuals with T-SCI.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single Level I trauma center in Québec, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and forty-four patients who sustained a T-SCI.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Socio-demographic and clinical administrative data were collected during the pre-operative period. The cohort was stratified in early surgery, or ES (<24 hours post-trauma) and late surgery, or LS (≥ 24 hours post-trauma) groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis using patient- and healthcare-related factors was carried out to identify the main predictors of LS.

RESULTS

93 patients had ES (15.6 ± 4.7 hours post-trauma), which is 31 hours earlier than the 51 patients in the LS group (46.9 ± 30.9 hours; P < 10^-3). The transfer delay from trauma site to the SCI center was 8 hours shorter (5.0 ± 3.0 hours vs 13.6 ± 17.0; P < 10^-3) for the ES group, and the surgical plan was completed 17 hours faster (6.0 ± 4.0 hours vs 23.3 ± 23.6 hours; P < 10^-3) than for the LS group. The occurrence of LS was predicted by modifiable factors, such as the transfer delay to the SCI center, the delay before surgical plan completion, and the waiting time for the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

A dedicated team for surgical treatment of individuals with T-SCI, involving direct transfer to the SCI center, faster surgery planning and access to the operating room in hospitals dealing with emergencies from all subspecialties could improve surgical delay and increase the rate of patients undergoing ES.

The impact of blood pressure management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Improving neurological recovery by reducing secondary injury is a major principle in the management of SCI. To minimize secondary injury, blood pressure (BP) augmentation has been advocated. The objective of this study was to review the evidence behind BP management after SCI.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Using the PubMed database, the authors identified studies that investigated BP management after acute SCI. Information on BP goals, duration of BP management, vasopressor selection, and neurological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven studies that met inclusion criteria were identified. Nine studies were retrospective, and 2 were single-cohort prospective investigations. Of the 9 retrospective studies, 7 reported a goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) of higher than 85 mm Hg. For the 2 prospective studies, the MAP goals were higher than 85 mm Hg and higher than 90 mm Hg. The duration of BP management varied from more than 24 hours to 7 days in 6 of the retrospective studies that reported the duration of treatment. In both prospective studies, the duration of treatment was 7 days. In the 2 prospective studies, neurological outcomes were stable to improved with BP management. The retrospective studies, however, were contradictory with regard to the correlation of BP management and outcomes. Dopamine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine were the agents that were frequently used to augment BP. However, more complications have been associated with dopamine use than with the other vasopressors.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no high-quality data regarding optimal BP goals and duration in the management of acute SCI. Based on the highest level of evidence available from the 2 prospective studies, MAP goals of 85–90 mm Hg for a duration of 5–7 days should be considered. Norepinephrine for cervical and upper thoracic injuries and phenylephrine or norepinephrine for mid- to lower thoracic injuries should be considered.

Using Evidence To Inform Practice and Policy To Enhance the Quality of Care for Persons with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

In today's economic climate, there is a need to demonstrate a return on investment for healthcare spending and for clinical practice and policy to be informed by evidence. Navigating this process is difficult for decision-makers, clinicians, and researchers alike. This article will describe how a knowledge translation framework and an evidence-based policy-making process were integrated to clarify the problem, frame options, and plan implementation, to impact clinical practice and policy in the area of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). The Access to Care and Timing (ACT) project is focused on optimizing the access and timing of specialized healthcare delivery for persons sustaining a tSCI in Canada. A simulation model was developed that uses current patient data to address complex problems faced by the healthcare system. At a workshop, participants stressed the importance of linking interventions to short- and long-term outcomes to drive change. Presently, there are no national, system level indicators to monitor performance after tSCI. Although the ideal system of care after tSCI is unknown, indicator collection will establish a baseline to measure improvement. The workshop participants prioritized two indicators important from the clinician and patient perspective-timely admission to rehabilitation and meaningful community participation. The ACT simulation model for tSCI care will be used to promote the uptake of identified indicators and provide a predictive link between interventions on potential outcomes. The standardized collection of outcome-oriented indicators will help to evaluate the access and timing of care and to define the ideal system of care after SCI.

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury and Central Cord Syndrome: Recommendations on the Timing (≤24 Hours Versus >24 Hours) of Decompressive Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations on the timing of surgical decompression in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and central cord syndrome.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address key relevant questions. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, along with their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the timing of surgical decompression in patients with SCI and central cord syndrome. Based on GRADE, a strong recommendation is worded as "we recommend," whereas a weak recommendation is presented as "we suggest."

RESULTS

Conclusions from the systematic review included (1) isolated studies reported statistically significant and clinically important improvements following early decompression at 6 months and following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation; (2) in one study on acute central cord syndrome without instability, a marginally significant improvement in total motor scores was reported at 6 and 12 months in patients managed with early versus late surgery; and (3) there were no significant differences in length of acute care/rehabilitation stay or in rates of complications between treatment groups. Our recommendations were: "We suggest that early surgery be considered as a treatment option in adult patients with traumatic central cord syndrome" and "We suggest that early surgery be offered as an option for adult acute SCI patients regardless of level." Quality of evidence for both recommendations was considered low.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines should be implemented into clinical practice to improve outcomes in patients with acute SCI and central cord syndrome by promoting standardization of care, decreasing the heterogeneity of management strategies, and encouraging clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.

Risk factors and the surgery affection of respiratory complication and its mortality after acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

The aim of this study is to estimate the risk factors of both respiratory complication (RC) and mortality after acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI). Between July 2005 and July 2015, in 181 patients (142 males and 39 females; mean age 41.0 years) with acute TCSCI, we compared the difference and odds ratio in RC group (n = 73) with that of non-RC group (n = 108), and also death group (n = 15) and survival group (n = 166). We collected injury-related information after half a year of injury, which is as follows: the causes of injury, time of surgery, ICU (intensive care unit) days, ventilator days, ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) classification, neurological injury, CIPS (Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score), and BMI (body mass index). Besides these, we gathered the general information such as age, gender, smoking history, and use of steroids. The study compared perioperative parameters; surgery-related and instrumentation- and graft-related complication rates; clinical parameters; patient satisfaction; and radiologic parameters. Variations like gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.269, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.609-2.646]), smoking history (OR = 2.902, 95% CI [1.564-5.385]), AIS grade (grade A) (OR = 6.439, 95% CI [3.334-12.434]), neurological level (C1-C4) (OR = 2.714, 95% CI [1.458-5.066]), and steroid use (OR = 2.983, 95% CI [1.276-6.969]) have a facilitated effect on RC. When we estimated surgery-related affection, only the time of surgery and anterior approach compared with posterior has significant difference in RC (P < .05). Between death and survival group, the aspect of age, non-surgical, CPIS, AIS grade, and BMI have statistically significant difference. Survival analysis reveals significant difference in aforementioned groups. In patients suffering from acute TCSCI, those who are old, have long smoking history, complete spinal cord injury, C1-C4, high CPIS, and fat have high incidence of RC and mortality.

Timing of Decompression in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and synthesis of the literature to assess the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of early (≤24 hours) versus late decompression (>24 hours) in adults with acute spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Google Scholar to identify studies published through November 6, 2014. Studies published in any language, in humans, and with an abstract were considered for inclusion. Included studies were critically appraised and the overall strength of evidence was determined using methods proposed by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group.

RESULTS

The search yielded 449 potentially relevant citations. Sixteen additional primary studies were identified through other sources. Six studies met inclusion criteria. All but 2 studies were considered to have moderately high risk of bias. Across studies and injury levels, the impact of early surgical decompression (≤24 hours) on clinically important improvement in neurological status was variable. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and clinically important improvements at 6 months (cervical injury, low strength of evidence) and following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (all levels, very low strength of evidence) but not at other time points; another study observed a statistically significant 6 point improvement in ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) among patients with AIS B, C, or D, but not for those with AIS A (very low strength of evidence). In one study of acute central cord syndrome without instability, a clinically and statistically meaningful improvement in total motor scores was reported at 6 and 12 months in patients treated early (versus late). There were, however, no significant differences in AIS improvement between early and late surgical groups at 6- or 12-months (very low strength of evidence). One of 3 studies found a shorter length of hospital stay associated with early surgical decompression. Of 3 studies reporting on safety, no significant differences in rates of complications (including mortality, neurologic deterioration, pneumonia or pressure ulcers) were noted between early and late decompression groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results surrounding the efficacy of early versus late decompressive surgery, as well as the quality of evidence available, were variable depending on the level of SCI, timing of follow-up, and specific outcome considered. Existing evidence supports improved neurological recovery among cervical SCI patients undergoing early surgery; however, evidence regarding remaining SCI populations and clinical outcomes was inconsistent.

Previously Identified Common Post-Injury Adverse Events in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-Validation of Existing Literature and Relation to Selected Potentially Modifiable Comorbidities: A Prospective Canadian Cohort Study

Adverse events (AEs) are common during care in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Increased risk of AEs is linked to patient factors including pre-existing comorbidities. Our aim was to examine the relationships between patient factors and common post-injury AEs, and identify potentially modifiable comorbidities. Adults with tSCI admitted to a Level I acute specialized spine center between 2006 and 2014 who were enrolled in the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) and had AE data collected using the Spine Adverse Events Severity system were included. Patient demographic, neurological injury, and comorbidities data were obtained from RHSCIR. Potentially modifiable comorbidities were grouped into health-related conditions, substance use/withdrawal, and psychiatric conditions. Negative binomial regression and multiple logistic regression were used to model the impact of patient factors on the number of AEs experienced and the occurrence of the five previously identified common AEs, respectively. Of the 444 patients included in the study, 24.8% reported a health-related condition, 15.3% had a substance use/withdrawal condition, 8% reported having a psychiatric condition; and 79.3% experienced one or more AEs. Older age (p = 0.004) and more severe injuries (p < 0.001) were nonmodifiable independent variables significantly associated with increased AEs. The AEs experienced by patients were urinary tract infections (42.8%), pneumonia (39.2%), neuropathic pain (31.5%), delirium (18.2%), and pressure ulcers (11.0%). Risk of delirium increased in those with substance use/withdrawal; and pneumonia risk increased with psychiatric comorbidities. Opportunity exists to develop clinical algorithms that include these types of risk factors to reduce the incidence and impact of AEs.

Early Spinal Surgery Following Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord Injury: Process of Care From Trauma to Theater

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to (1) determine the timing of surgery for traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury (TLSCI) between 2010 and 2014 and (2) identify major delays in the process of care from accident scene to surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Early spinal surgery may promote neurological recovery and reduce acute complications after TLSCI; however, it is difficult to achieve due to logistical issues and the frequent presence of other nonlife-threatening injuries.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the medical records of 46 cases of acute traumatic TLSCI (AIS level T1-L1) aged between 15 and 70 years. Patients with life-threatening injuries, not requiring spinal surgery or with poor general health, were excluded.

RESULTS

The median time to surgery was 27 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 20-43 hours] and improved from 27 hours in 2010 to 22 hours in 2014. Cases admitted via a pre-surgical hospital had a longer median time to surgery than direct surgical hospital admissions (28 vs. 24 hours, respectively). The median time from completion of radiological investigations to surgery was 18 hours, suggesting that theater access and organization of a surgical team were the major factors contributing to surgical delay. Number of vertebral levels fractured (≥5) and upper thoracic level of injury (T1-8) were also found to be associated with surgical delay.

CONCLUSION

Earlier spinal surgery in TLSCI would be facilitated by direct surgical hospital admission and improved access to the operating theater and surgical teams.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Geomapping of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada and Factors Related to Triage Pattern

Current research indicates that more than half of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) experience delays in transfer and receive surgery >24 h post-injury. The objectives of this study were to determine the geographic distribution of tSCI in Canada relative to specialized treatment facilities, to assess clinical and logistical factors at play for indirect admissions to those facilities, and to explore differences in current time to admission and simulated scenarios in an attempt to assess the potential impact of changes to triage protocols. This study included data from 876 patients with tSCI enrolled in the prospectively collected acute Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013 for whom there were data on the location of their injury. Patients transported directly to a RHSCIR acute facility were more likely to reach the facility within 1 h of injury, whereas those transported indirectly were more likely to arrive 7 h later. Considering the injuries occurring within 40 km of a RHSCIR acute facility (n = 323), 249 patients (77%) were directly and 74 (23%) were indirectly admitted. In the multivariate regression analysis, only older age and longer road distance remained significantly associated with being indirectly admitted to a RHSCIR facility. Compared with the current status, the median time to admission decreased by 20% (3.5 h) in the 100% direct admission scenario, and increased by 102% (8.9 h) in the 100% indirect admission scenario.

Effectiveness of a multi-layer foam dressing in preventing sacral pressure ulcers for the early acute care of patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury: comparison with the use of a gel mattress

Individuals with spinal cord injury are at risk of sacral pressure ulcers due to, among other reasons, prolonged immobilisation. The effectiveness of a multi-layer foam dressing installed pre-operatively in reducing sacral pressure ulcer occurrence in spinal cord injured patients was compared to that of using a gel mattress, and stratified analyses were performed on patients with complete tetraplegia and paraplegia. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected from 315 patients admitted in a level-I trauma centre following a spinal cord injury between April 2010 and March 2016. Upon arrival to the emergency room and until surgery, patients were transferred on a foam stretcher pad with a viscoelastic polymer gel mattress (before 1 October 2014) or received a multi-layer foam dressing applied to their sacral-coccygeal area (after 1 October 2014). The occurrence of sacral pressure ulcer during acute hospitalisation was similar irrespective of whether patients received the dressing or the gel mattress. It was found that 82% of patients with complete tetraplegia receiving the preventive dressing developed sacral ulcers as compared to only 36% of patients using the gel mattress. Although multi-layer dressings were suggested to improve skin protection and decrease pressure ulcer occurrence in critically ill patients, such preventive dressings are not superior to gel mattresses in spinal cord injured patients and should be used with precaution, especially in complete tetraplegia.